modelling spray impingement
DESCRIPTION
Modelling Spray Impingement. the importance of mutual droplet-droplet interaction. Frank Bierbrauer and Tim Phillips Cardiff University, UK. Sprays in Industry. Direct fuel injection in Diesel engines Spray cooling of steel sheets Spray coating and painting - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Modelling Spray Modelling Spray ImpingementImpingement
the importance of mutual the importance of mutual
droplet-droplet interactiondroplet-droplet interaction
Frank Bierbrauer and Tim PhillipsCardiff University, UK
Sprays in IndustrySprays in IndustryDirect fuel injection in Diesel enginesDirect fuel injection in Diesel engines
Spray cooling of steel sheetsSpray cooling of steel sheets
Spray coating and paintingSpray coating and painting
Agricultural: insecticide sprays, irrigationAgricultural: insecticide sprays, irrigation
Fire quenchingFire quenching
Spray CharacteristicsSpray CharacteristicsFirst Stage (spray injection)First Stage (spray injection)
– A liquid jet is injected into an ambient A liquid jet is injected into an ambient gaseous medium such as airgaseous medium such as air
– Cavitation within the injector causes Cavitation within the injector causes initial break-upinitial break-up
– The high speed flow is further broken up The high speed flow is further broken up into liquid sheets, ligaments and dropletsinto liquid sheets, ligaments and droplets
Spray CharacteristicsSpray Characteristics Second Stage (dispersed liquid phase)Second Stage (dispersed liquid phase)– Individual droplets are further broken up Individual droplets are further broken up
through aerodynamic forces producing a through aerodynamic forces producing a range of droplet sizesrange of droplet sizes
– Multiple droplets of varying diameters and Multiple droplets of varying diameters and shapes travel through the ambient gasshapes travel through the ambient gas
Third Stage (Impact)Third Stage (Impact)– Single droplet impact behaviourSingle droplet impact behaviour
• Kinematic and spreading phase, crown splashKinematic and spreading phase, crown splash
– Multiple droplet impact behaviourMultiple droplet impact behaviour• Generation of secondary droplets, liquid film Generation of secondary droplets, liquid film
accumulation on wallaccumulation on wall
Single DropletSingle Droplet• Droplets may stick, bounce or break up into Droplets may stick, bounce or break up into
smaller onessmaller ones• Impact behaviour depends on: inertial, viscous Impact behaviour depends on: inertial, viscous
and surfaces forcesand surfaces forces• Droplet break-up consists of an initial Droplet break-up consists of an initial
compressible/kinematic phase (very early on) compressible/kinematic phase (very early on) followed by approximately incompressible followed by approximately incompressible behaviourbehaviour
• Spreading phase: thin film lamella spreads Spreading phase: thin film lamella spreads outwards from the impact point bounded by a outwards from the impact point bounded by a rim for rim for tt* < 0.1 (t* = tU* < 0.1 (t* = tUdd/D/Ddd))
• Surface forces restrict spread after Surface forces restrict spread after tt* > √We* > √We • Splash crown formed, crown height and radius Splash crown formed, crown height and radius
directly dependent on Weber number, secondary directly dependent on Weber number, secondary droplets expelled depending on splashing droplets expelled depending on splashing thresholdthreshold
The Main AssumptionThe Main Assumption
• Prevailing models assume and extrapolate Prevailing models assume and extrapolate the results of single droplet impact onto the results of single droplet impact onto solid walls to the case of spray-wall solid walls to the case of spray-wall interaction by the superposition of many interaction by the superposition of many individual dropletsindividual droplets
• How accurate is this assumption ? When does it How accurate is this assumption ? When does it break down ? How important is mutual droplet-break down ? How important is mutual droplet-droplet interaction ?droplet interaction ?
• There is a need to model the impact of more than There is a need to model the impact of more than one droplet to answer these questionsone droplet to answer these questions
Multiple DropsMultiple Drops• Individual droplet splashes generate Individual droplet splashes generate
secondary droplets, multiple droplets interact secondary droplets, multiple droplets interact in their splash behaviourin their splash behaviour
• Multiple droplets interact through their Multiple droplets interact through their spreading lamella as well as intervening spreading lamella as well as intervening gaseous mediumgaseous medium
• Multiple droplets accumulate a liquid film Multiple droplets accumulate a liquid film which influences the splashing threshold, which influences the splashing threshold, ejected mass and number of secondary ejected mass and number of secondary droplets, creation of central jets and splash droplets, creation of central jets and splash typetype
• In splashing the crown radius and height no In splashing the crown radius and height no longer depend directly on the impact Weber longer depend directly on the impact Weber numbernumber
(D. (D. Kalantari, C. Tropea, Kalantari, C. Tropea, Int. J. Multiphase FlowInt. J. Multiphase Flow, , 3333 (2007), 525-544 (2007), 525-544.).)
Mathematical ModelMathematical Model
1
gd
gd
/μC1Cμ
ρC1Cρ
FrρρWe
ρκμ
Reρ
1p
ρ
1
t
0Ct
C
0
u
u
Duuu j
0C 0,μ 0,ρ ,ΩΩΩΩ
nnn0u
Characteristic Impact BehaviourCharacteristic Impact Behaviour• Characteristic parameters for the droplet (Characteristic parameters for the droplet (dd) and ) and
the ambient gas (the ambient gas (gg))
• DDdd = 0.001 m, = 0.001 m, dd = 1000 kg/m = 1000 kg/m33, , dd = 0.001 kg/ms, = 0.001 kg/ms,
gdgd = 0.072 N/m, = 0.072 N/m, gg = 1 kg/m = 1 kg/m33, , gg = 1 = 1××1010-5-5 kg/ms, kg/ms,
gg = 9.81 m/s = 9.81 m/s22
d
2d
d
ddd
gd
d2dd
gD
UFr,
μ
DUρRe,
σ
DUρWe
The Multi-Droplet Impact The Multi-Droplet Impact ProblemProblem
No-slip conditions
Numerical ModelNumerical Model
• Multiphase flowMultiphase flow: : One-Field modelOne-Field model
• Solution TypeSolution Type: : Eulerian-Lagrangian, Eulerian-Lagrangian, mesh-particle methodmesh-particle method
• IncompressibilityIncompressibility: : Godunov approximate Godunov approximate projection methodprojection method
• Interface Tracking Interface Tracking
AlgorithmAlgorithm: : Marker-Particle Marker-Particle MethodMethod
(F. Bierbrauer, S.-P. Zhu, Comput. Fluids, 36 (2007), 1199-1212)
Godunov Projection Method: Godunov Projection Method: Algorithm 1Algorithm 1
1/2n1/2n1/2n1/2n1/2n
n1/2nμ
1/2n1/2nμ
1/2n
1nn1/2n1nn1/2n
1
gd1n1n1n
gd1n1n1n
1/2nn
σpσΔt
Lσ2Re
ΔtILσ
2Re
ΔtI
/2μμμ/2ρρρ
/μC1CμρC1Cρ
C
Fuu
uu
u
uuu
velocity teintermedia for the solve 3.
and obtain to
,
thatso method particle-marker theusing update 2.
calculate ,For 1. 1/2nnnn p,C,μ,ρ
Godunov Projection Method: Godunov Projection Method: Algorithm 2Algorithm 2
1/ρσ
,
ψ,σψL
μLFr
ρ
ρρWe
ρκρ
φσL2Re
Δtφpp
φΔtσΔt
1φL
1/2nσ
1/2nμ
1n1/2n1/2nμ
1n1/2n1/2n
1n1/2n1n1n1/2nσ
and
where
gradient pressure theupdate 5.
by followed
result eproject th 4.
Twwwj
F
uuu
Marker-Particle TrackingMarker-Particle Tracking• Initial particle configuration (e.g. 4 particles per cell)Initial particle configuration (e.g. 4 particles per cell)
• Allocation of fluid colour Allocation of fluid colour CC within a computational cell within a computational cell containing two fluid phases: 1 and 2. Two sets of marker containing two fluid phases: 1 and 2. Two sets of marker particles are required, one for each fluid involvedparticles are required, one for each fluid involved
• Use Lagrangian tracking of particles by solving Use Lagrangian tracking of particles by solving dxdxpp/dt = u/dt = up p
where where uupp is a particle velocity interpolated from nearby grid is a particle velocity interpolated from nearby grid velocitiesvelocities
• Interpolate particle colour data back to gridInterpolate particle colour data back to grid• Particles permanently maintain fluid identity throughout the Particles permanently maintain fluid identity throughout the
simulationsimulation
Test CasesTest Cases
• UUdd = 1 = 1 m/sm/s, We = 13.8, Re = 1000, Fr =102, We = 13.8, Re = 1000, Fr =102
• UUdd = 10 = 10 m/sm/s, We = 1388, Re = 10000, , We = 1388, Re = 10000,
Fr = 10193Fr = 10193
We = 13.8We = 13.8
Single drop Two Isolated dropletsIsolated droplets
We = 13.8We = 13.8
Reference Case Larger central dropLarger central droplet
We = 13.8We = 13.8
Reference case Smaller central dropSmaller central droplet
We = 1388We = 1388
Two isolated dropsSingle droplet Isolated Droplets
We = 1388We = 1388
Larger central dropReference case Larger central droplet
We = 1388We = 1388
Reference case Smaller central droplet
ConclusionsConclusions
Surface Forces Dominant,Surface Forces Dominant, WeWe = 13.8 = 13.8– Provided that two impacting droplets are far enough Provided that two impacting droplets are far enough
apart their individual impact behaviour appears apart their individual impact behaviour appears independentindependent
– When three neighbouring droplets of equal size impact When three neighbouring droplets of equal size impact a solid surface some of the fluid from the two a solid surface some of the fluid from the two neighbouring droplets is shunted into the formation of a neighbouring droplets is shunted into the formation of a greater crown height and larger secondary droplets of greater crown height and larger secondary droplets of the central dropletthe central droplet
– If the central droplet is larger than the two neighbours If the central droplet is larger than the two neighbours most of the expelled droplets are of equal sizemost of the expelled droplets are of equal size
– If the central droplet is smaller than the two neighbours If the central droplet is smaller than the two neighbours most of the expelled droplets form larger fluid massesmost of the expelled droplets form larger fluid masses
ConclusionsConclusions
Inertial Forces Dominant,Inertial Forces Dominant, WeWe = 1388 = 1388– At higher kinetic energies two individual droplets must At higher kinetic energies two individual droplets must
be further apart, than the be further apart, than the WeWe = 13.8 case, in order for = 13.8 case, in order for their impacts to appear independenttheir impacts to appear independent
– When three neighbouring droplets of equal size impact When three neighbouring droplets of equal size impact a solid surface at high kinetic energy much of the a solid surface at high kinetic energy much of the expelled mass is distributed above the surface in a mist-expelled mass is distributed above the surface in a mist-like configurationlike configuration
– If the central droplet is larger than the two neighbours If the central droplet is larger than the two neighbours most of the combined droplet mass is centrally most of the combined droplet mass is centrally distributed with a large crown height and radiusdistributed with a large crown height and radius
– If the central droplet is smaller than the two neighbours If the central droplet is smaller than the two neighbours most of the combined droplet mass is spread along the most of the combined droplet mass is spread along the wall with a small central crown radiuswall with a small central crown radius
Future WorkFuture Work
• The current qualitative work is only a first stage The current qualitative work is only a first stage in an investigation of multi-droplet impact in an investigation of multi-droplet impact behaviourbehaviour
• Future work will involve detailed quantitative Future work will involve detailed quantitative measures frequently used in spray measurements measures frequently used in spray measurements such as the temporal variation of deposited fluid such as the temporal variation of deposited fluid mass, accumulated fluid layer thickness, crown mass, accumulated fluid layer thickness, crown height and radius as well as the distribution of height and radius as well as the distribution of secondary droplet sizes secondary droplet sizes