model qcc nec

2

WELCOMENational Convention

Quality circle 2010

3

LEADERPHILEMON

DEPUTY LEADERMONISHA

SAMARTHTEAM MEMBERS

RECODER TIME KEEPERGEETHIKA DARSHAN

4

SAMARTH

5

ACTIVE MEMBER

ACTIVE MEMBER

RAJESH ANGELACTIVE MEMBER

ABDUL

SAMARTH

7

Ms.CHETHANAFACILITATORS

CO-ORDINATOR: Mrs.ASHA

SAMARTH

Ms.PALLAVI

8NEC BANGALORE

CP-04 : Diploma in ElectronicsCP-08 : Diploma in Computer EngineeringCP-09 : Diploma In Information TechnologyCP-10: Post Diploma In Power ElectronicsSpecial Course : NCVT(Only for physically challenged)

SAMARTH

9

TEAM PROFILE:Date of formation Day of meetingVenue of meetingDuration of meetingNo of meetingsAttendance%Project under takenProject completed

: 2nd,Dec 09: Wednesday: Classroom 3: 2 Hours: 21 no.: 100%: 01: 01

SAMARTH

AIM:“TO DESIGN THE FUTURE

WITH QUALITY AND INNOVATION.”

SAMARTH

OBJECTIVE:

“TO UNIFY THE POTENTIAL OF OUR TEAM

TO REACH THE ESTEEM LEVEL OF QUALITY.”

SAMARTH

Steps followed

in our QC

process .

12

SAMARTH

Identification of problem

Selection of problem Definition of problem Analysis of problem Cause and effect analysis

Root cause analysis

SAMARTH

Data analysis on root cause

Development of solution

Foreseeing probable resistance

Trial implementationRegular implementation

Follow up review

SAMARTH

Process Decision Program

Chart

SAMARTH

SAMARTH QC teamprocess

Identification of the problem

Brain stormingtechnique Past experience

Data collection

Selection of theproblem

Definition of The problem

stratification Matrix diagramData collection

A

SAMARTH

Analysis of the problem

Pareto chart & Check list

Validation & Why-Why Analysis

Root cause analysis

Cause & effect diagram

Cause & effect analysis

4W & 1H Technique

A

B

SAMARTH

17

Pie chartData collection

Development of solutions

Data analysis on route cause

Regular implementation

Trial implementation

Foreseeing probable resistance

B SAMARTH

Follow up review18

IDENTIFICATION OF

PROBLEMS

STEP1 SAMARTH

19

20

SAMARTH

IDENTIFIED 67 PROBLEMS

BRAIN STORMING&

DATA COLLECTION

SAMARTH

21

1. No proper utilization of components tester by trainees.2. No proper maintenance of first aid box.3. Submission of assignments, notes & records are not done properly by

trainees.4. No frequent conduction of seminars.5. No proper utilization of transformer winding machine by trainees.6. No proper utilization of pneumatic and hydraulic labs by trainees.7. No proper conduction of open forums.8. Lack of experienced faculties.9. No proper guidance for doing projects.10.No proper transportation facilities for 1st years.11. Non availability of lockers in 1st year campus.12.No proper information regarding mess bills.13.No updating of syllabus for IInd & IIIrd years.14.Services like Xerox, printout etc, are not provided for trainees.15.No proper equipments in physics lab for 1st year trainees.16.No proper contact with other engineering collages.

LISTED PROBLEMS SAMARTH

22

17.No proper maintenance of 5’s box .18.No proper exposure of projects done by the trainees.19.No proper maintenance of projectors, OHP’s and junction boxes.20.No proper utilization of the machines using in workshop.21.No proper allocation of particular workbenches to the trainees.22.High failure in practical's .23.Lack of trouble shooting skills in trainees.24.Lack of knowledge about non-working of equipments in trainees.25.No updation of components status list in labs.26.No proper allocation of equipments to the particular trainees in AE-II lab.27.Consuming more time for taking extra labs.28.No awareness regarding the safety precaution to be followed in

workshop.29.Lack of basic knowledge in trainees.30.No proper interaction between seniors and juniors.31.Lack of component testers in analog lab AE-II.32. In efficient utilization of working hours by trainees.33. Improper working of DTK’s and mp-kits.

SAMARTH

23

34. Non availability of class rooms for extra classes.35.No proper allocation of time for sports, to the trainees.36. No proper net facility for second year trainees.37. No proper co-curricular activities are conducted for trainees.38. Insufficient no. of technical portraits in labs and class rooms.39. No proper conduction of safety week.40. Completion of syllabus is not done on time by the faculties.41. Activities are not carried out as mentioned in the activity calendar.42. Non availability of tools in workshop.43. Lack of necessary books in library for trainees.44. No fire alarm system in campus.45. No proper information regarding the absence of faculties.46. No proper information regarding industries. 47. Non availability of components during extra labs.48. Mis -utilization of library cards by trainees.49. Wastage of time in collecting the components in labs.50. No proper maintenance of class rooms.

SAMARTH

24

51. No lab manuals to guide the trainees.52. Lack of components in analog lab II53. Wastage of electricity in classrooms.54. No hobby projects are allocated in 4th semester.55. No drinking water facility in working area.56. Non- availability of required software's.57. No proper engagement of classes in the absence of allocated facilities.58. Components are not issued in right time for projects.59. Insufficient stationary items in general stores.60. Time is not allocated for utilizing library facility.61. Improper time management in conducting assembly62. No proper guidance from faculties during extra labs.63. Lack of library facility for first year trainees.64. No proper usage of daily dairy by trainees.65. No proper guidance for visitors 66. No proper awareness regarding new software.67. No proper 5’s activities are followed in labs and classrooms by the trainees.

SAMARTH

25

SELECTION OF PROBLEM

STEP2 SAMARTH

26

IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS

A

CB

CATEGORIZATION: SAMARTH

27

The problems which can be solved only by the trainees.

The problems which can be solved by the trainees with the minimum help of the management .

The problems which can be solved only by the management.

Category A:

Category B:

Category C:

SAMARTH

-CATEGORY A13 SAMARTH

29

A- category SAMARTH

1. High failure rate in practical's.2. Lack of trouble shooting skills in trainees.3. No improvement in the internal’s percentage level of CP04 II year

trainees.4. Consuming more time for taking extra labs.5. Lack of basic knowledge in trainees.6. No proper interaction between seniors and juniors.7. Lack of component testers in analog electronics lab-II.8. No regular check up of suggestion box.9. No updating of component status list in labs.10. Lack of knowledge about the working of equipments in first year

trainees.11.No awareness, regarding the safety precautions to be followed in

workshop.12.Lack of junction boxes in CP04 II year class rooms.13.No proper allocation of particular workbench to the trainees.

20 -CATEGORY B SAMARTH

31

1. No proper maintenance of 5’s box .2. No proper exposure of projects done by the trainees.3. No proper utilization of the machines using in workshop.4. No proper utilization of components tester by trainees.5. No proper maintenance of first aid box.6. Submission of assignments, notes & records are not done properly by trainees.7. No frequent conduction of seminars.8. No proper utilization of transformer winding machine by trainees.9. No proper utilization of pneumatics and hydraulics labs by trainees.10. No proper 5’s activities are followed in labs and classrooms by trainees.11. Improper working of DTK’s and mp-kits.12. No proper usage of daily dairy by trainees.13. No proper guidance for visitors.14. No proper awareness regarding new software.15. No proper information regarding industries.16. Non availability of components during extra labs.17. Mis -utilization of library cards by trainees.18. Wastage of time in collecting the components in labs.19. No proper maintenance of class rooms.20. Consuming more time for taking extra labs.

B- category SAMARTH

-CATEGORY C34 SAMARTH

33

1. No proper conduction of open forums.2. Lack of experienced faculties.3. No proper guidance for doing projects.4. No proper transportation facilities for 1st years.5. Non availability of lockers in 1st year campus.6. No proper information regarding mess bills.7. No updating of syllabus for IInd & IIIrd years.8. Services like Xerox, printout etc, are not provided for trainees.9. No proper equipments in physics lab for 1st year trainees.10.No proper contact with other engineering collages.11.No proper guidance from faculties during extra labs.12.Lack of library facility for first year trainees.13.Non availability of class rooms for extra classes.14.No proper allocation of time for sports, to the trainees.15.No proper net facility for second year trainees.16.No proper co-curricular activities are conducted for trainees.17.Insufficient no. of technical portraits in labs and class rooms.

c- category: SAMARTH

34

18.No proper conduction of safety week.19.Completion of syllabus is not done on time by the faculties.20.Activities are not carried out as mentioned in the activity calendar.21. Non availability of tools in workshop.22. Lack of necessary books in library for trainees.23. No fire alarm system in campus.24. No proper information regarding the absence of faculties.25. No lab manuals to guide the trainees.26. Lack of components in analog lab II27. Wastage of electricity in classrooms.28. No hobby projects are allocated in 4th semester.29. No drinking water facility in working area.30. Non- availability of required software's.31.Components are not issued in right time for projects.32. Insufficient stationary items in general stores.33. Time is not allocated for utilizing library facility.34. Improper time management in conducting assembly.

c- category: SAMARTH

35

1. No regular check up of suggestion box.Sol: Allocating leaders to collect the suggestions and to inform the academic in-charge for every month.2. No updation of component status list in labs.Sol: Updating the component status list in labs.3. Lack of knowledge about the working of equipments in first year trainees.Sol: Preparing and pasting the checklist on each and every work bench.4. No awareness, regarding the safety precautions to be followed in workshop.Sol: Preparing and pasting the safety precautions on the machines in the workshop.5. Lack of junction boxes in CP04 II year class rooms.Sol: Provided junction boxes for CP04 II year class rooms. 6. No proper allocation of particular workbench to the trainees.Sol: Preparation of seating sequence to the trainees in AE-I and AE-II labs.

SAMARTHThe problems which can be solved

then & there, and their solutions

36

1. High failure rate in practical's.2. Lack of trouble shooting skills in trainees.3. No improvement in the internal’s percentage level of CP04 II year trainees.4. Consuming more time for taking extra labs.5. Lack of basic knowledge in trainees.6. No proper interaction between seniors and juniors.7. Lack of component testers in analog electronics lab-II.

SAMARTH The problems which cannot be solved then & there

37

REPRESENTATION OF SELECTED DATA IN THE

FORM OF CHECK SHEET

SAMARTH

38

PROBLEM TALLY NO.OF VOTES

CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY

% CUMMULATIVE %

1. No improvement in the internal’s percentage level of CP04 2nd year trainees

IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIIIIIII IIII IIII IIII IIII

70 70 44.03 44.03

2.Lack of trouble shooting skills in trainees.

IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIIIIIII

35 105 22.01 66.04

3. Lack of basic knowledge in trainees.

IIII IIII IIII IIII 19 124 11.95

77.99

4. Consuming more time for taking extra labs.

IIII IIII III 13 137 8.18 86.17

5. High failure rate in practical’s.

IIII IIII 10 147 6.29 92.46

6. No proper interaction between seniors and juniors.

IIII III 8 155 5.03 97.49

7. Lack of component testers in analog electronics lab –II.

IIII 4 159 2.51 100

CHECK SHEET SAMARTH

39 0

10

20

30

120

110

10090807060

50

40

140130

10

20

30

90

80

70

60

50

40

92.46

44.03

66.04

86.17Vital few

Trivial many

100

1 2 3 4 5 6

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

NO.OF PROBLEMS

70

35

1913 10 08

77.79

150

160

04

97.49

7

1. No improvement in the internal’s percentage level of CP-04 II year trainees.

2. Lack of trouble shooting skills in trainees.

3. High failure rate in practical's.

4. Consuming more time for taking extra labs.

5. Lack of basic knowledge in trainees.

6. No proper interaction between seniors and juniors.

7. Lack of components in analog electronics lab-II

PARETO CHART: SAMARTH

40

OUR PROBLEM:

NO IMPROVEMENT IN THE INTERNAL’S PERCENTAGE LEVEL OF CP04 II YEAR

TRAINEES.

SAMARTH

41

Definition of the problem

STEP 3 SAMARTH

42

DEFINITION OF PROBLEM

By Considering the Statistics(i.e., the Internal’s Percentage

Level) of CP04 II year Trainees from the

Exam Cell.

SAMARTH

43

PERCENTAGE

Graph, representing the “THEORY” internal’ s

percentage level of past 3 batches of cpo4 II year.

SAMARTH

Batches

44

A Graph, representing the “PRACTICAL” internal’s percentage level of past 3 cpo4 II year batches. P

ERCENTAGE

SAMARTH

Batches

45

We aim,

To Improve the Internal ‘s

Percentage Level of CP04 II year

trainees.

SAMARTH

46

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21


Cause and effect analysis

Root cause analysis



Foreseeing probable resistances



Follow up review

Meeting noSteps

MILESTONE CHART SAMARTH

STEP 4 SAMARTH

Analysis Of The Problem

48

What is the problem?No improvement in the internal’s percentage level of CP04 II year trainees.When does it occur? During an academic year.Where does it occur ? In internal’s percentage level of CP04 II year trainees.Who are affected ? Second year trainees are affected.How does it effect ? No decrement in the backlogs of trainees.

4W 1H Analysis SAMARTH

49

STEP 5 SAMARTH

CAUSE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS

50Material

Wastage of time in collecting the

components from other

labs.

Wastage of time to get the

belongings in between the class hours.

Wastage of time to arrange stationary,

junction boxes and OHP for the classes.

Consumption of time in identifying working and

non working components.

Inefficient utilization of working hours by

trainees.

Insufficient time for doing experiment

by the trainees.

Wastage of time in collecting the belongings in between the classes.

Utilization the lab hours for completion of the records.

Trainees are not attending the class on time.

ManMachineRequired

software's for the trainees

are not installed in systems.

Trainees are not sure that whether the existing

component testers are working or not

No proper outcome in labs due to increase in

non working equipments .

Interruptions occurring

during practical session.

No engagement of classes in the

absence of concerned faculties.

Consumption of time for the trainees to get his doubts

cleared for doing the further experiment.

Wastage of time for submission of files

& records.Method

No improvement in the internal’s % level of CP04 2nd

year trainees

SAMARTH

51

Inefficient utilization of

working hours by trainees.

Insufficient time for doing experiment by

the trainees.

Utilization the lab hours for completion

of records.

Variation of time in clocks in our institute.

In ability to manage the time by trainees.

Lockers are not kept in the required places.

Wastage of time for giving daily attendances.

Trainees are unable to complete the assignments in the allocated time.

Trainees are not attending the class

on time.

Wastage of time in

collecting the belongings in between the

classes.

There is no centralized timing system.

Utilization more time than the allocated time for a particular activity.

Trainees are not following the lab procedure.

MAN SAMARTH

52

Mishandling the equipments by

trainees .

Improper maintenance

of working equipments.

No proper maintenance record regarding the testers

available in lab.

No knowledge about the working of

equipments.

No proper calibration of the working equipments.

MACHINE

No proper outcome in labs due to

increase in non working equipments.

Required software's for

the trainees are not installed in

systems.

Trainees are unable to identify whether

the existing component testers

are in working condition.

SAMARTH

53

Wastage of time to get the belongings in

between the class hours.

Consumption of time in identifying working and

non working components.

Wastage of time to arrange

stationary items, junction boxes and OHP for the

classes.

Wastage of time in collecting the

components from other labs.

No proper component testers available in lab.

Non-availability of required components

in particular lab.

Lockers are not kept near the classrooms.

Stationary, OHP and junction boxes are not

kept in class room.

No arrangement to keep stationary, OHP and

junction boxes safely .

Trainees are not knowing, how to check the components.MATERIAL

SAMARTH

54

No time allocated to

submit records and files.

No information regarding the absence of faculties.

No proper time allocated for the cleaner to clean

the lab.

Allocation of theory classes during lab hours to

the faculties.

No allocation of other faculties to guide the trainees in absence of

particular subject in charge.

No engagement of classes in the

absence of concerned faculties.

Interruptions occurring

during practical session.

Due to power failure.

Wastage of time for submission of

files & records.

Consumption of time for the trainees to get his

doubts cleared for doing the further experiment.

SAMARTHMETHOD

55

VALIDATION OF CAUSES

-MAJOR

-NEGLIGIBLE-MINOR

SAMARTH

56

VALIDATION OF CAUSES

1. Inefficient utilization of working hrs by trainees.2. Wastage of time to arrange junction boxes, stationary items & OHP’s for the classes.3. Trainees are unable to identify whether the existing component testers are in working

condition. 4. No engagement of classes in the absence of concerned faculties.

MAJOR:

MINOR:1. Insufficient time for doing experiments by the trainees.2. Wastage of time collecting the belongings in between the classes.3. No proper outcome in labs due to increases in non-working equipments.4. Consumption of time for the trainees to get his doubts cleared for doing the further

experiment.5. Wastage of time collecting the components from other labs.

NEGLIGIBLE:1. Utilizing the lab hours for completion of the records.2. Trainees are not attending the class on time.3. Required software's for the trainees are not installed in systems.4. Wastage of time to get the belongings in between class hours.5. Consumption of time in identifying the working and non working components.6. Interruption happening during practical session.7. Wastage of time for submission of files & records.

SAMARTH

57

STEP 6

WHY ? WHY ? Analysis

SAMARTH

Root Cause Analysis

58

Inefficient utilization of working hours bytrainees.

In ability to follow right time by trainees.

Variation of time in clocks in our institution.

No proper check up of timings in all the

clocks in our institution .

WHY???

WHY???

WHY???

For 1st major cause SAMARTH

59

Wastage of time to arrange junction boxes stationary items and OHP’s for the class

rooms .

WHY???

OHP’s junction boxes ,stationary items are

not kept in class rooms.

WHY???

No arrangements made to maintain OHP’s

junction boxes and stationary items safely in the class rooms.

For 2nd major cause SAMARTH

60

Trainees are unable to identify whether the existing components testers are in

working condition.

WHY???

No proper maintenance record regarding the testers

available in lab. WHY???

No regular maintenance for the component testers.

For 3rd major cause SAMARTH

61

For 4th Major cause

No engagement of classes in the absence of concerned faculties.

WHY???

No information regarding the absence of faculties .

WHY???

No one is allocated for checking the absence of

faculty.

SAMARTH

62

Data Analysis On Root Cause

STEP 7 SAMARTH

63

SLNO CAUSESVOTES GIVEN BY TRAINEES

VOTES IN PERCENTAGE

1. Inefficient utilization of working hours by trainees. 92 57.86%

2. Wastage of time to arrange junction boxes ,stationary items and OHP’s for the class rooms . 38 23.9%

3. No regular maintenance for the component testers. 21 13.21%

4. No one is allocated for checking the absence of faculty. 8 5.03%

DATA FOR INDIVIDUAL CAUSES: SAMARTH

64

Graphical representation of data

SAMARTH

CAUSES57.86%

23.9%

13.21%5.03%

65

• Theory session

8.00am-10.00am

2.50pm-4.50pm

•Practical session

WORKING SCHEDULE OF CP04 II YEAR TRAINEES

Break10.00am-10.10am

Lunch break12:10pm-12:40pm

Break2:40pm-2:50pm

The same procedure is followed alternately for the other batches of CP04 II year trainees.

Arranging OHP7.55 am- 8.00am

SAMARTH

66

How the time is exactly getting wasted

SAMARTH

67

SAMARTHActivities Actual

Time(min.)UtilizedTime(min.)

Wastage of time(min.)

Allocating OHP

0 5 5

T-Break 10 25 15Lunch break 30 50 20T-Break 10 25 15Allocation of faculties

0 10 10

Identifying components

0 10 10

TOTAL WASTAGE OF TIME :1 Hr. 15mins.

AVERAGE WASTAGE OF TIME PER DAY:

68

SAMARTH

So by this, trainees are wasting 5 min from the first hour of the theory session.

Allocated time for arranging OHP: 7:55am – 8:00am

Utilized time for arranging OHP :7:55am -8.05am

Wastage of time during working hours:

SAMARTH

69

So by this trainees are wasting 15 mins from the 3rd hour of the theory session.

Allocated time for break: 10:00am – 10:10am

Utilized time for break: 10:00am -10.25am


70

SAMARTH

By this trainees are wasting 20min from the next practical session

Allocated time for lunch: 12:10pm -12:40pm

Utilized time for lunch:12:10pm - 1.00pm


SAMARTH

71By this trainees are wasting 15min from the next practical session

Allocated time for break: 2:40pm – 2:50pm

Utilized time for break:2:40pm -3:05pm


72

SAMARTH

By this, its clear that the wastage of time is “1Hr.15 Mins” per day.

73

SAMARTH

“Moments unfold into hours,

Hours unfold into days,

Days unfold into months,

Months unfold into years

& Years unfold into

lifetime”.

“If you waste even a moment you end up wasting a life”

74

So, we decided to solve this wastage of time “1Hr.15Mins”by developing a solution.

SAMARTH

75

STEP 8Development

of

solutions

SAMARTH

76

SAMARTH

Taking initiatives by trainees to set the clock.

Informing Faculties Regarding Classes Through Software

Developing alarm system in our institute.

By Designing centralized timing system in our institute.

LIST OF SOLUTIONS

77

Graphical representation of data SAMARTH

SOLUTIONS

1st solution

2nd solution

3rd solution

4th solution

50.32%23.9%

16.98%

8.8%

78

Samarth Centralized

Timing System

Our Project: SAMARTH

79

SAMARTH

Demonstration of the

project

SAMARTH

80

SAMARTH

ACT PLAN

DOCheck

PDCA cycle:

81

SAMARTHPROCEDURE FOLLOWED FOR THE PROJECT “SCTS”

82

SCTS SAMARTH

83

SAMARTH

Printed circuit board 50RS

chassis 100RS

components 200RS

Total cost estimation 350RS

PROJECT COST ESTIMATION

84

Solving one cause will not solve the problem completely.So we designed the solutions for other causes also as follows..

SAMARTH

85

Cause 2: Wastage of time to arrange junction boxes stationary items and OHP’s for the class rooms .

Equipments Maintenance List

Batch :Date of updating :Signature :(Class Representative)

Equipments Equipment no StatusOHP

Junction Box

For this , we allocated OHP’s , junction boxes,& stationary items to the class rooms permanently, and prepared a maintenance list for that.

SAMARTH

86

Cause 3: Trainees are unable to identify whether the existing component tester are in working condition.

So, We solved this cause by Implementing Maintenance Record of Component Testers

SAMARTH

87

No Engagement of classes in absence of allocated faculties

We solved this cause by preparing a faculties allocation chart

SAMARTHCause4:

88

SAMARTH

Sl.no Activity done Done by days

01 Digital clock Rajesh Abdul 10

02 Allocation charts Geethika Angel 01

03 Check sheet Philemon Monisha

01

04 Development of maintenance records

Angel Darshan 02

05 Data collection all _

Activity plan sheet

89

STEP 9Foreseeing Probable

Resistances

SAMARTH

90

SAMARTH

1.If power fails how the clock works. we provided the backup circuit for the clock.

2.If there is variation in time due to mal-functioning of the clock.

we provided the facility to set the time manually.

3.If the power fails the circuit may consume more power for the backup provided.

we have provided a logic circuit for consuming less power so that it will have a long backup.

Probable Resistances:

91

4.If OHP’s and junction boxes are not working what can be done.

we have provided maintenance report for testing OHP’s and junction boxes every weekend.

5.If trainees are not knowing how to work with the testers.

we have provided guidelines for each component testers to the trainees.

6.If class representative is absent how the work continues.

we have allocated substitute for doing that particular work.

SAMARTH

92

STEP 10 SAMARTH

TRIAL IMPLEMENTATION

93

Progress of trainees Before & after

implementation of “SCTS”

SAMARTH

94

SAMARTH

In efficient utilization of working hours by trainees.

Trainees are utilizing working hours efficiently and effectively.

1.Before implementation After implementationProgress of trainees:

95

SAMARTH

Wastage of time in arranging OHP’s junction boxes and stationary items for classes.

There is no wastage of time in arranging OHP’s junction box and stationary items for the class rooms.

2. Before implementation After implementation

96

SAMARTH

Trainees were unable to identify whether the existing component testers are working condition.

Trainees are sure that the particular component testers are working by seeing the maintenance record.

3.Before implementation After implementation

97

SAMARTH

No engagement of classes in the absence of concerned faculty.

Classes are engaged with the substitution of absence faculty.

4.Before implementation After implementation

98

SAMARTH

2k62k72k82k62k72k8

61.33%

86.12%

67.8% 65%

89.36%

THEORY PRACTICAL

60.46%

Increment internal’s percentage level of CP-04 II year trainees.

99

We achieved our target by improving the average internal’s Percentage level from 63.64% 87.74%

SAMARTH

100

STEP 11

Regular Implementation

SAMARTH

On 30th March 2010

101

TANGIBLE GAINS

Efficient utilization of working hours by trainees.

No wastage of time for arranging OHP’s, Junction box for the class room.

Time is utilized by the trainees with the substitution of absence of faculty.

SAMARTH

102

we improved our thinking power. Increased our communication skills. Increased our Presentation Skills. Developed our team work. Developed leadership quality. Can identify easily the component tester.

INTANGIBLE GAINS SAMARTH

103

STEP 12FOLLOW UP REVIEW

SAMARTH

104

STANDARDIZATION: SAMARTH

Records regarding Samarth Centralized Timing System (SCTS).

Maintenance record for junction boxes, OHP’s.

Implementing check list.

Maintenance record for component tester.

105

SAMARTH 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21


Cause and effect analysis

Root cause analysis



Foreseeing probable resistances



Follow up review

Meeting noSteps

MILESTONE CHART

106

SAMARTH

Future problem:

Lack of trouble shooting skills in

trainees

107

SAMARTH QC tools used

Sl.no QC tools01 Pareto chart

02 Check sheet

03 Graphs

04 Cause & Effect diagram

05 Process Decision Program Chart (PDPC)

06 Matrix diagram

108

SAMARTH

THANK YOU

109

Any Quires ???????.

SAMARTH

model qcc nec

Education