metro public poll results

7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results

1/46

220-4476

Survey Conducted:

May 20-May 26 & May 31-June 1, 2016

!"# $%&'('# )"*%+,

!"#$%&'"(#()'$ *%%+,% -+".,/ 0123


2/46

2


3/46

3

-./0 1'+2"3"("&,

Conducted a telephone survey (landlines and cell phones)

between May 20-26, May 31-June 1, 2016 Interviews with 2,125 Los Angeles County voters likely to

vote in November 2016, including new registrants

Survey was available in English and Spanish

Margin of error for the full sample is 2.5% and half thesample is 3.5%

Margin of error for each Metro Polling Area is 5.7% andhalf for each Metro Polling Area is 8.0%

Some percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding


4/46

4

-./4 1'+2"3"("&,

Some questions were tracked from the 2015 Metro Long

Range Transportation Random Digit Dial TelephoneSurvey conducted between March 17-29, 2015

Results from the 2015 survey include only 863respondents who self-reported they are registered to votein LA County and were definitely going to vote in the

November 2016 General Election Survey was available in English and Spanish

Margin of error for the reported sample is 3.4% and half

sample is 4.8%


5/46

5

15678 9"((:%& $;'


6/46

6

=', >:%3:%

There are no statistically meaningful differences between a

50-year sunset measure and a no-sunset measure.

Initial support, after hearing just the ballot title and summary,is within the margin of error for passage.

After educational outreach messages, support increasesabove the two-thirds threshold.

Two-thirds of voters are more likely to vote for the measure

if its title is Los Angeles County Traffic Improvement Plan.


7/46

7

=', >:%3:% )"%+:%*'3

Keeping senior, disabled and student fares affordable;

creating jobs; repairing potholes; earthquake retrofittingbridges and improving freeway traffic flow are among themeasures most important features.

Sub-regional benefits and the need to provide transportation

options for an aging County population are among the topreasons to be more inclined to vote yes on the measure.


8/46

8

=', >:%3:% )"%+:%*'3

Support for Metros Ballot Measure does not appear to be

adversely affected by its placement among other LA Countymeasures on the ballot, whether asked about first or third.However, since the initial level of support for the measurewas within the margin of error for passage, it would beadvisable to have the measure as high as possible on theballot.

Support for the Homeless Measure does not appear to besignificantly hindered by the order in which it appears on theballot.

The Parks Measure is clearly more vulnerable as itsplacement moves farther down the ballot.


9/46

9


10/46

10

?% -./0@ < A(*;


11/46

11


12/46

12Q3 & Q4. If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would you vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?

M


13/46

13

38%

19%

8%

3%

6%

21%

6%

0% 15% 30% 45% 60%

Definitely yes

Probably yes

Undecided, lean yes

Undecided, lean no

Probably no

Definitely no

Undecided

TotalNo

30%

TotalYes64%

62';' :# %" #+


14/46

14

36%

33%

30%

27%

19%

31%

30%

32%

34%

24%

11%

11%

14%

11%

21%

12%

13%

12%

14%

22%

11%

12%

12%

13%

14%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Los Angeles County TrafficImprovement Plan

Los Angeles County Traffic

Improvement and Safety Plan

Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic

Improve Transportation, Reduce Traffic

^More Transportation, Ease Traffic

Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. DK/NA

TotalMoreLkly.

TotalLessLkly.

!"# $$#

!%# $%#

!$# $!#

!$# $

%'# %'#

N:F:(


15/46

15

MeanScore

6.0

6.0

6.0

5.9

5.9

5.86.1

73%

74%

73%

70%

69%

67%

79%

13%

12%

10%

14%

13%

15%

7%

5%

5%

6%

7%

7%

7%

9%

10%

7%

8%

10%

9%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2016

2015

Creating jobs

Repairing potholes

Earthquake retrofitting bridges

2016

2015

(6-7) Very Impt. (5) Smwt. Impt. (4) Neut. (1-3) Not Too/Not At All Impt. DK

=''A:%& #'%:";@ 3:#


16/46

16

67%

73%

64%

62%

63%

63%

70%

62%

64%

15%

12%

15%

12%

16%

15%

14%

17%

16%

7%

5%

6%

9%

7%

8%

8%

5%

9%

9%

13%

15%

11%

12%

12%

10%

10%5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2016

2015

2016

2015

^Improving bridge safety

2016

2015

2016

2015

(6-7) Very Impt. (5) Smwt. Impt. (4) Neut. (1-3) Not Too/Not At All Impt. DK MeanScore

5.86.0

5.7

5.6

5.7

5.6

5.8

5.7

5.8

)"%+:%*'3

Q8. I am now going to mention some features and provisions of the proposed measure entitled Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic that Iasked you about earlier. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, please tell me how important it is to you that the feature or provision beincluded as part of the measure. We will use a scale of one to seven, where one means NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT to you that the feature orprovision is included in the measure and seven means it would be VERY IMPORTANT. ^Not Part of Split Sample; Note in 2015 Earthquakeretrofitting bridges and overpasses was shown as Earthquake retrofitting bridges, tunnels and overpasses and Reducing polluted road runoffflowing into waterways and onto beaches was shown as Preventing polluted toxic roadway runoff from entering storm drains and flowing intocreeks, rivers and coastal waters and onto County beaches.

(Ranked by Very Important 6 and 7)

Earthquake retrofitting bridges andoverpasses

Improving freeway safety

Reducing polluted road runoff flowinginto waterways and onto beaches

Improving job, school, and airportconnections


17/46

17

Mean

Score

5.6

5.5

5.5

5.5

5.5

5.4

59%

59%

58%

58%

58%

56%

16%

15%

18%

15%

15%

17%

8%

7%

8%

10%

9%

11%

12%

14%

14%

13%

14%

14%

5%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Requiring oversight

Requiring independent audits

Improving job, school, stadium and airport

connections

Expanding rail and bus systems

Requiring annual independent audits

Reducing polluted road runoff

(6-7) Very Impt. (5) Smwt. Impt. (4) Neut. (1-3) Not Too/Not At All Impt. DK

)"%+:%*'3

Q8. I am now going to mention some features and provisions of the proposed measure entitled Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic that Iasked you about earlier. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, please tell me how important it is to you that the feature or provision beincluded as part of the measure. We will use a scale of one to seven, where one means NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT to you that the feature orprovision is included in the measure and seven means it would be VERY IMPORTANT. ^Not Part of Split Sample

(Ranked by Very Important 6 and 7)


18/46

18

?FA";+


19/46

19

57%

45%

46%

21%

26%

23%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Much More Incl. Smwt. More Incl.

NA'B:O:B@ #*DP;'&:"%++(" 2'% 5!I

G) (0'#0'1 ,>$ J$,-+ 4-$'">2F 501>, K20( 50'$ F$", ,+ 5!IE 2'% $L,$'%0'1 ,>$4-$'">2F @-+H$C, '+-,> ,+ ,>$ J$,-+ /6-@($ 50'$ +' M0(">0-$ 2'% ,>-+61> M$",

N+(()F++% ,+ ,>$ J$,-+ K$% 50'$ 0' N+(()F++%D .' 2%%0,0+'E 0, @-+A0%$" 2'2@@-+L0?2,$() OP ?0($ ,-2'"0, C+''$C,0+' +' *$-?+', !A$'6$ B-+? OP:,> Q,-$$,E

H6", "+6,> +B ,>$ J$,-+ R-$$' 50'$E ,+ N+(()F++% S+6($A2-%D

(1*+23- /242,.,23+10.' ,>$ '$L, OT )$2-"E ,>$ '6?G$- +B @$+@($ ;T 2'% +A$- 0'5+" !'1$($" 4+6',) 0" $L@$C,$% ,+ 0'C-$2"$ G) U:V ,+ +A$- P ?0((0+' "$'0+-"D M$

'$$% ,+ 0'A$", 0' A2' "$-A0C$" 2'% @6G(0C ,-2'"0, ,>2, "$'0+-"E 0'C(6%0'1 A$,$-2'"2'% @$+@($ F0,> %0"2G0(0,0$"E C2' ,2#$ ,+ >$(@ ,>$? ?20',20' ,>$0- 0'%$@$'%$'C$

2'% -$%6C$ ,>$ G6-%$' +' ,>$0- C2-$10A$-"D

!"#$% &'() *+,$-" .' /+((0'1 !-$2 3 Q2' W$-'2'%+ *2(($) 7'89:P< (1.+ 5*-+.+63 7.//*80=>0" ?$2"6-$@-+A0%$" ,-2BB0C -$(0$B B+- 2(( 2-$2" +B ,>$ 4+6',)D .' ,>$ Q2' W$-'2'%+ *2(($)

"@$C0B0C2(()E 0, >$(@" 0?@-+A$ ,-2BB0C B(+F 2'% "2B$,) G) -$@2A0'1 ",-$$,"E -$@20-0'1@+,>+($"E ")'C>-+'0X0'1 "01'2(" 2'% $2-,>Y62#$ -$,-+B0,,0'1 G-0%1$"D ., 2("+ B6'%",-2'"0, @-+H$C," ,>2, C+''$C, ,>$ Q2' W$-'2'%+ *2(($) ,+ 5!I 6'%$- ,>$ Q$@6(A$%2

/2""E 2" F$(( 2" C+'A$-, ,>$ J$,-+ &-2'1$ 50'$ S6"F2) ,+ 2 (01>, -20( (0'$C+''$C,0'1 M++%(2'% N0(("E Z+-,> N+(()F++%E ,>$ S6-G2'# !0-@+-,E /2"2%$'2 2'%

,>$ R-$2,$- Q2' R2G-0$( *2(($)D

(Ranked by Total More Inclined to Vote Yes)

70%


20/46

20

41%

42%

42%

30%

26%

26%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%


)"%+:%*'3

Q9. I am going to mention to you some statements made by supporters of the Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic measure. Please tellme if it makes you more inclined to vote for this ballot measure. Split Sample

70%

68%

!"#$% &'() *+,$-" .' /+((0'1 !-$2 3 =>$ Q+6,> S2) 7'89:9< (139,: ;.80=>0" ?$2"6-$ @-+A0%$" ,-2BB0C-$(0$B B+- 2(( 2-$2" +B ,>$ 4+6',)D .' ,>$ Q+6,> S2) "@$C0B0C2(()E 0, >$(@" 0?@-+A$

,-2BB0C B(+F 2'% "2B$,) G) -$@20-0'1 @+,>+($"E -$?+A0'1 #$) G+,,($'$C#" +' /2C0B0C4+2", N01>F2)E N2F,>+-'$ 2'% 4-$'">2F S+6($A2-%" 2'% M$",$-' !A$'6$E 2'%

$2-,>Y62#$ -$,-+B0,,0'1 G-0%1$"D ., 2("+ B6'%" 0?@-+A$?$'," ,+ ,>$ [:T B-$$F2)"G$,F$$' W(+-$'C$ !A$ 2'% ,>$ OO: B-$$F2)" 2'% $L,$'%" ,>$ J$,-+ R-$$' 501>,

K20( 50'$ "+6,> ,+F2-%" Q2' /$%-+ B-+? K$%+'%+ S$2C> 2'% ,+ ,>$ =+--2'C$ =-2'"0,4$',$-D W0'2(()E 0, @-$A$'," @+((6,$% -+2%F2) -6'+BB B-+? $',$-0'1 ",+-? %-20'" 2'%

B(+F0'1 +6, 0',+ 5+" !'1$($" 4+6',) F2,$-F2)" 2'% G$2C>$"D!"#$% &'() *+,$-" .' /+((0'1 !-$2 \ M$", 5+" !'1$($" 4+6',) 7'89:]< (0" ?$2"6-$ @-+A0%$"

,-2BB0C -$(0$B B+- 2(( 2-$2" +B ,>$ 4+6',)D &' ,>$ M$","0%$ +B 5+" !'1$($" "@$C0B0C2(()E0, >$(@" 0?@-+A$ ,-2BB0C B(+F 2'% "2B$,) +' (+C2( ",-$$," G) -$@20-0'1 @+,>+($"E

")'C>-+'0X0'1 "01'2(" 2'% $2-,>Y62#$ "2B$,) 6@1-2%$" ,+ G-0%1$" 2'% -+2%"D ., 2("+B6'%" "6C> ,-2'"0, @-+H$C," ,>2, C+''$C, 5!I ,+ ,>$ Q2' W$-'2'%+ *2(($) 6'%$- ,>$

Q$@6(A$%2 /2""E 2'% $L,$'%" ,>$ J$,-+ 4-$'">2F 5!I 501>, K20( 50'$E F>0C> 0"C6--$',() 6'%$- C+'",-6C,0+'E ,+ ,>$ J$,-+ /6-@($ 50'$ +' M0(">0-$ 2'% ,>-+61>

M$", N+(()F++% ,+ ,>$ J$,-+ K$% 50'$ 0' N+(()F++%D

(*=,*+6 ,-.+12,0=>0" ?$2"6-$ F0(( $L,$'% ?+-$ (01>,\-20( ,+ P: -20( (0'$"E +A$- U:

",2,0+'" 2'% C+A$- P:: ?0($"E 2" F$(( 2" 2%% ?+-$ G6" -+6,$" ,+ G60(% +6, ,>$4+6',) ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' ")",$? "+ -$"0%$'," C2' 1+ ?+-$ C+'A$'0$',() 2'% ?+-$2BB+-%2G() ,+ ?+-$ @(2C$"D


68%


21/46

21

41%

41%

41%

27%

27%

27%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%


)"%+:%*'3

Q9. I am going to mention to you some statements made by supporters of the Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic measure. Please tellme if it makes you more inclined to vote for this ballot measure. Split Sample

68%

68%

(>3;1?:*/@ ;912+*11*105+C2( $C+'+?0"," $",0?2,$ ,>2, ,>$ B-$$F2)E (+C2( ",-$$,2'% @6G(0C ,-2'"0, @-+H$C," 2(+'$ F0(( C-$2,$ ,$'" +B ,>+6"2'%" +B F$((\@2)0'1 H+G"

,>-+61>+6, ,>$ 4+6',)D =>+"$ F+-#$-" F0(( ,>$' "@$'% ?+'$) (+C2(()E F>0C> F0((

1$'$-2,$ >6'%-$%" +B ?0((0+'" +B %+((2-" 0' -$A$'6$" B+- 5+" !'1$($" 4+6',)^" "?2((E

?$%06? 2'% (2-1$ G6"0'$""$" 2'% 2' 2%%0,0+'2( '$$% B+- F+-#$-"D

(-*;92/62+A 39- 5-**2'%($D =>0" ?$2"6-$ F0(( >$(@ 6@1-2%$ 2'% ?+%$-'0X$ +6-

210'1 B-$$F2)"E >01>F2)"E ,6''$("E +A$-@2""$" 2'% G-0%1$" ,+ ?2,C> 2 PO", 4$',6-)

$C+'+?) 2'% @-$@2-$ B+- ,>$ >6'%-$%" +B ,>+6"2'%" +B 2%%0,0+'2( C2-" $L@$C,$% +'

+6- -+2%" +A$- ,>$ '$L, "$A$-2( %$C2%$"D

(;92/62+A $BCD )*+,9-8 181,*405+" !'1$($" 4+6',)^" ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' ")",$? 0"

+A$- ;: )$2-" +(% 2'% %+$" '+, 2%%-$"" ,>$ '$$%" +B 0," -$"0%$',"D =>0" ?$2"6-$ F0((

B0'2(() G-0'1 +6- ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' ")",$? 0',+ ,>$ PO", 4$',6-) G) G60(%0'1 2 ?+%$-',-2'"@+-,2,0+' '$,F+-# F>0C> $L@2'%" (01>, -20(E K2@0% S6"E J$,-+(0'#E B-$$F2)" 2'%

>01>F2)" ,+ $A$-) C+-'$- +B ,>$ 4+6',)D


68%


22/46

22

41%

40%

42%

41%

26%

28%

25%

25%

0% 20 % 4 0% 6 0% 8 0%


)"%+:%*'3

Q9. I am going to mention to you some statements made by supporters of the Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic measure. Please tellme if it makes you more inclined to vote for this ballot measure. ^Not Part of Split Sample

68%

67%

!"#$% &'() *+,$-" .' /+((0'1 !-$2 3 Q+6,>$2", 5+" !'1$($" 4+6',) 7Z89:P< (139,:*.1,0=>0" ?$2"6-$ @-+A0%$" ,-2BB0C-$(0$B B+- 2(( 2-$2" +B ,>$ 4+6',)D .' ,>$ "+6,>$2", @2-, +B ,>$ C+6',) "@$C0B0C2(()E 0, >$(@"

0?@-+A$ ,-2BB0C B(+F 2'% "2B$,) G) -$@20-0'1 @+,>+($"E $2-,>Y62#$ -$,-+B0,,0'1 G-0%1$"E0?@-+A0'1 "2B$,) 2, -20( C-+""0'1"E 2" F$(( 2" 2%%0'1 C-+""F2(#" 2'% "0%$F2(#"D ., 2("+ 0?@-+A$"

C+''$C,0+'" ,+ H+G"E "C>++(" 2'% (+C2( 20-@+-," G) B6'%0'1 @-+H$C," ,+ -$%6C$E F0%$' 2'%6@1-2%$ ,>$ .T B-$$F2) G$,F$$' ,>$ ;:T 2'% ,>$ UO: G+,,($'$C#"E 2" F$(( 2" 2(+'1 ,>$ UO:

B-$$F2) G$,F$$' %+F',+F' 5! 2'% ,>$ /+-," +B 5+" !'1$($" 2'% 5+'1 S$2C> 2'% 2 '$F (01>,-20( C+''$C,0+' B-+? ,>$ 40,) +B !-,$"02 2'% _'0+' Q,2,0+' 0' `+F',+F' 5+" !'1$($"D

(/*7*-.A*?.))*/*-.,*0 /2""0'1 ,>0" ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' "2($" ,2L ?$2"6-$ $'"6-$" ,>2,5+" !'1$($" 4+6',) >2" 2 162-2',$$% "+6-C$ +B B6'%0'1 ,+ G$ $(010G($ B+- >6'%-$%" +B ?0((0+'"+B %+((2-" 0' $L0",0'1 ",2,$ 2'% B$%$-2( ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' ?2,C>0'1 B6'%"E F>0C> F+6(% +,>$-F0"$

1+ ,+ +,>$- C+6',0$"D =>0" 2%%0,0+'2( B6'%0'1 F0(( "@$$% 6@ ,>$ C+?@($,0+' +B (01>, -20(E"6GF2)E J$,-+(0'#E B-$$F2)E >01>F2) 2'% (+C2( ",-$$, 0?@-+A$?$'," 2C-+"" ,>$ 4+6',)D

a(5-** 9@ ,24*0=>$ 5+" !'1$($" 2-$2 >2" ,>$ F+-", ,-2BB0C 0' ,>$ 4+6',-)D ! ,)@0C2( ?+,+-0",0' 5+" !'1$($" 4+6',) $L@$-0$'C$% ]O >+6-" +B %$(2) +' 2-$2 B-$$F2)" 0' P:OTE F>0C> 0" ?+-$

,>2' 2G+6, ,F+ F$$#" +B F+-#D M$ '$$% ,+ C+',0'6$ ,+ 0'A$", 0' +6- B-$$F2)"E (+C2( -+2%" 2'%@6G(0C ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' ,+ >$(@ $2"$ ,-2BB0C 2'% 2((+F 6" ,+ C(20? G2C# "+?$ >+6-" +B +6- (0B$D

()31, E$%?8*.-05+C2( $C+'+?0"," "2) ,>0" ?$2"6-$ F0(( +'() C+", ,>$ 2A$-21$ 5+" !'1$($"4+6',) -$"0%$', 2G+6, bP[ 2 )$2-D =>2,^" 2G+6, ,F+ %+((2-" 2 ?+',>E F>0C> 0" 2 "?2(( @-0C$ ,+

@2) ,+ $2"$ ,-2BB0C 2'% >$(@ -$(0$A$ 2 C+?@($,$() +A$-F>$(?$% ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' ")",$?D


66%

68%


23/46

23

40%

42%

37%

42%

26%

23%

27%

21%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%


)"%+:%*'3

Q9. I am going to mention to you some statements made by supporters of the Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic measure. Please tellme if it makes you more inclined to vote for this ballot measure. ^Not Part of Split Sample

66%

65%

a(.))39+,.;2/2,80 =>0" ?$2"6-$ 0'C(6%$" ",-0C, 2CC+6',2G0(0,) -$Y60-$?$'," 0'C(6%0'1 2'&A$-"01>, 4+??0,,$$ 2'% 0'%$@$'%$', 2''62( B0'2'C02( 2'% @$-B+-?2'C$ 26%0,"E F>0C> F0(( G$

2A20(2G($ +'(0'$ 2'% 2, @6G(0C (0G-2-0$"E 2'% 2(( ?+'$) F0(( ",2) (+C2( 2'% C2''+, G$ ,2#$' G)Q2C-2?$',+D

!"#$% &'()*+,$-" .' /+((0'1 !-$2 3 Q2' R2G-0$( *2(($) 7'89:[< (1.+ A.;-2*/ 7.//*80=>0" ?$2"6-$ @-+A0%$" ,-2BB0C-$(0$B B+- 2(( 2-$2" +B ,>$ 4+6',)D .' ,>$ Q2' R2G-0$( *2(($) "@$C0B0C2(()E 0, >$(@" 0?@-+A$ ,-2BB0C B(+F

2'% "2B$,) G) -$@20-0'1 @+,>+($"E ")'C>-+'0X0'1 "01'2("E -$%6C0'1 G+,,($'$C#"E C+'",-6C,0'1$2-,>Y62#$ "2B$,) 0?@-+A$?$'," +' G-0%1$" 2'% -+2%"E 2'% 6@1-2%0'1 ,>$ UO B-$$F2) G$,F$$',>$ O: 2'% ,>$ ;: B-$$F2)"D ., 2("+ B6'%" ,-2'"0, @-+H$C," ,>2, $L,$'% ,>$ J$,-+ R+(% 501>, K20(

50'$ B6-,>$- $2", B-+? c2", 5D!D 2(+'1 ,>$ ;: B-$$F2) ,+F2-% Q+6,> c( J+',$E 2" F$(( 2" $L,$'% ,>$J$,-+ R+(% 501>, K20( 50'$ B-+? ,>$ !X6"2 ",2,0+' B6-,>$- $2", ,>-+61> R($'%+-2 2'% Q2' `0?2",+F2-% 4(2-$?+',D

(43-* @*3@/*?).-10S) ,>$ )$2- P:9:E 2G+6, +'$ ?0((0+' 2%%0,0+'2( @$+@($ F0(( (0A$ 0'5+" !'1$($" 4+6',)D =>0" @+@6(2,0+' 0'C-$2"$ C+6@($% F0,> 2(( ,>$ '$F %-0A$-" F>+ F0(( >2A$ C+?$+B 21$E F0(( 2%% ,$'" +B ,>+6"2'%" +B '$F C2-" ,+ +6- -+2%" $2C> %2)D M$ '$$% ,>0" -$(02G($ "+6-C$

+B B6'%0'1 ,+ 6@1-2%$ +6- 210'1 B-$$F2) 2'% -+2% '$,F+-# 2'% G60(% +6, +6- 4+6',)^" @6G(0C,-2'"@+-,2,0+' '$,F+-#E 0'C(6%0'1 (01>, -20(E ,+ ?$$, +6- 4+6',)^" '$$%"D

!"#$% &'() *+,$-" .' /+((0'1 !-$2 3 Z+-,> 4+6',) 7'89::< (+3-,: )39+,80=>0" ?$2"6-$ @-+A0%$" ,-2BB0C -$(0$B B+- 2((

2-$2" +B ,>$ 4+6',)D .' ,>$ Q2',2 4(2-0,2 2'% !',$(+@$ *2(($)" "@$C0B0C2(()E 0, >$(@" 0?@-+A$ ,-2BB0CB(+F 2'% "2B$,) G) -$@2A0'1 ",-$$,"E -$@20-0'1 @+,>+($"E 6@1-2%0'1 J$,-+(0'# "$-A0C$ 2'% "2B$,)E 2"F$(( 2" C-+""F2(#" 2'% "0%$F2(#"D ., F0(( 2("+ B6'% @-+H$C," ,>2, -$%6C$ G+,,($'$C#"E F0%$' 2'%

6@1-2%$ ,>$ .T B-$$F2) 0' Q2',2 4(2-0,2E Z$F>2(( 2'% 42",20CE 2" F$(( 2" 2(+'1 ,>$ O[ B-$$F2) 0'/2(?%2($ 2'% 52'C2",$-D ., F0(( 2("+ B6'% ,>$ G60(%0'1 +B 2 '$F ,+(( >01>F2)E #'+F' 2" ,>$ N01>

`$"$-, 4+--0%+-E G$,F$$' ,>$ O[ B-$$F2) 0' /2(?%2($ 2'% OT B-$$F2) 0' *0C,+-A0(($D


63%

65%


24/46

24

6"+


25/46

25

38%

19%

8%

3%

6%

21%

6%

0% 2 5% 5 0% 75 % 10 0%

TotalNo

30%

TotalYes

64%

Q3 & Q10. (50-Year Sunset) If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?Q4 & Q11. (No Sunset) If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?

46%

19%

6%

3%

4%

19%

3%

0% 25 % 5 0% 75 % 10 0%

TotalNo

26%

TotalYes

70%

Vote AfterEducationInitial Vote

57% 65%

Definitely yes

Probably yes

Undecided,lean yes

Undecided,lean no

Probably no

Definitely no

Undecided

42%

16%

6%

3%

6%

21%

6%

0% 25 % 50% 75% 100%

TotalNo

30%

TotalYes

64%

58%

47%

17%

8%

3%

4%

19%

2%

0% 25% 50% 75 % 100%

TotalNo

26%

TotalYes

72%

64%

62' :%:+:


26/46

26


27/46

27

]"+' 9;"&;'##:"% O"; +2' )'%+;


28/46

28

]"+' 9;"&;'##:"% O"; +2' S";+2 )"*%+, 9"((:%& $;'

metro public poll results

Documents