measuretheory demystified

220
Primbs, MS&E345 1 Measure Theory in a Lecture Monday, March 19, 2012

Upload: arunshivananda2754

Post on 26-Oct-2014

138 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 1

Measure Theory in a Lecture

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 2: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 2

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 3: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 2

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 4: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 3

A little perspective:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 5: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 3

A little perspective:

Riemann did this...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 6: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 3

A little perspective:

Riemann did this...

...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 7: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 4

A little perspective:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 8: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 4

A little perspective:

Lebesgue did this...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 9: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 4

A little perspective:

Lebesgue did this...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 10: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 4

A little perspective:

Lebesgue did this...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 11: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 4

A little perspective:

Lebesgue did this...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 12: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 4

A little perspective:

Lebesgue did this...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 13: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 4

A little perspective:

Lebesgue did this...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 14: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 4

A little perspective:

Lebesgue did this...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 15: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 5

A little perspective:

Lebesgue did this...

Why is this better????

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 16: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 6

A little perspective:

Lebesgue did this...

Why is this better????

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 17: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 6

A little perspective:

Lebesgue did this...

Why is this better???? Consider the function:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 18: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 6

A little perspective:

Lebesgue did this...

Why is this better???? Consider the function:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 19: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 6

A little perspective:

Lebesgue did this...

Why is this better???? Consider the function:

If we follow Lebesgue’s reasoning, then the integral of this function over the set [0,1] should be:

(Height) x (width of irrationals) = 1 x (measure of irrationals)

Height

Width of Irrationals

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 20: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 6

A little perspective:

Lebesgue did this...

Why is this better???? Consider the function:

If we follow Lebesgue’s reasoning, then the integral of this function over the set [0,1] should be:

(Height) x (width of irrationals) = 1 x (measure of irrationals)

Height

Width of Irrationals

If we can “measure” the size of superlevel sets, we can integrate a lot of function!

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 21: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 7

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 22: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 7

Measure Theory begins from this simple motivation.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 23: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 7

Measure Theory begins from this simple motivation.

If you remember a couple of simple principles, measure and integration theory becomes quite intuitive.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 24: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 7

Measure Theory begins from this simple motivation.

If you remember a couple of simple principles, measure and integration theory becomes quite intuitive.

The first principle is this...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 25: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 7

Measure Theory begins from this simple motivation.

If you remember a couple of simple principles, measure and integration theory becomes quite intuitive.

The first principle is this...

Integration is about functions. Measure theory is about sets. The connection between functions and sets is super/sub-level sets.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 26: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 8

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 27: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 8

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 28: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 9

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 29: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 9

Measure theory is about measuring the size of things.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 30: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 9

Measure theory is about measuring the size of things.

In math we measure the size of sets.

Set A

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 31: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 9

Measure theory is about measuring the size of things.

In math we measure the size of sets.

Set AHow big is the set A?

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 32: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 10

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 33: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 10

“Size” should have the following property:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 34: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 10

“Size” should have the following property:

The size of the union of disjoint sets should equal the sum of the sizes of the individual sets.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 35: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 10

“Size” should have the following property:

The size of the union of disjoint sets should equal the sum of the sizes of the individual sets.

Makes sense.... but there is a problem with this...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 36: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 10

“Size” should have the following property:

The size of the union of disjoint sets should equal the sum of the sizes of the individual sets.

Makes sense.... but there is a problem with this...

Consider the interval [0,1]. It is the disjoint union of all real numbers between 0 and 1. Therefore, according to above, the size of [0,1] should be the sum of the sizes of a single real number.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 37: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 10

“Size” should have the following property:

The size of the union of disjoint sets should equal the sum of the sizes of the individual sets.

Makes sense.... but there is a problem with this...

Consider the interval [0,1]. It is the disjoint union of all real numbers between 0 and 1. Therefore, according to above, the size of [0,1] should be the sum of the sizes of a single real number.

If the size of a singleton is 0 then the size of [0,1] is 0.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 38: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 10

“Size” should have the following property:

The size of the union of disjoint sets should equal the sum of the sizes of the individual sets.

Makes sense.... but there is a problem with this...

Consider the interval [0,1]. It is the disjoint union of all real numbers between 0 and 1. Therefore, according to above, the size of [0,1] should be the sum of the sizes of a single real number.

If the size of a singleton is 0 then the size of [0,1] is 0.If the size of a singleton is non-zero, then the size of [0,1] is infinity!

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 39: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 10

“Size” should have the following property:

The size of the union of disjoint sets should equal the sum of the sizes of the individual sets.

Makes sense.... but there is a problem with this...

Consider the interval [0,1]. It is the disjoint union of all real numbers between 0 and 1. Therefore, according to above, the size of [0,1] should be the sum of the sizes of a single real number.

If the size of a singleton is 0 then the size of [0,1] is 0.If the size of a singleton is non-zero, then the size of [0,1] is infinity!

This shows we have to be a bit more careful.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 40: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 11

Sigma Algebras (σ-algebra)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 41: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 11

Sigma Algebras (σ-algebra)Consider a set Ω.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 42: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 11

Sigma Algebras (σ-algebra)Consider a set Ω.

Let F be a collection of subsets of Ω.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 43: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 11

Sigma Algebras (σ-algebra)Consider a set Ω.

Let F be a collection of subsets of Ω.

F is a σ-algebra if:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 44: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 11

Sigma Algebras (σ-algebra)Consider a set Ω.

Let F be a collection of subsets of Ω.

F is a σ-algebra if:

1)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 45: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 11

Sigma Algebras (σ-algebra)Consider a set Ω.

Let F be a collection of subsets of Ω.

F is a σ-algebra if:

1)

2)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 46: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 11

Sigma Algebras (σ-algebra)Consider a set Ω.

Let F be a collection of subsets of Ω.

F is a σ-algebra if:

1)

2)

3)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 47: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 11

Sigma Algebras (σ-algebra)Consider a set Ω.

Let F be a collection of subsets of Ω.

F is a σ-algebra if:

1)

2)

3)

4)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 48: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 11

Sigma Algebras (σ-algebra)Consider a set Ω.

Let F be a collection of subsets of Ω.

F is a σ-algebra if: An algebra of sets is closed under finite set operations. A σ-algebra is closed under countable set operations. In mathematics, σ often refers to “countable”.

1)

2)

3)

4)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 49: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 12

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 50: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 12

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 51: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 13

Algebras are what we need for super/sub-level sets of a vector space of indicator functions.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 52: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 13

Algebras are what we need for super/sub-level sets of a vector space of indicator functions.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 53: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 13

Algebras are what we need for super/sub-level sets of a vector space of indicator functions.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 54: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 13

Algebras are what we need for super/sub-level sets of a vector space of indicator functions.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 55: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 13

Algebras are what we need for super/sub-level sets of a vector space of indicator functions.

Superlevel Sets

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 56: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 13

Algebras are what we need for super/sub-level sets of a vector space of indicator functions.

Superlevel Sets

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 57: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 13

Algebras are what we need for super/sub-level sets of a vector space of indicator functions.

Superlevel Sets

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 58: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 14

Superlevel Sets

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 59: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 14

Superlevel Sets

Simple Functions

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 60: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 14

Superlevel Sets

Simple FunctionsSimple functions are finite linear combinations of of indicator functions.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 61: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 14

Superlevel Sets

Simple FunctionsSimple functions are finite linear combinations of of indicator functions.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 62: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 14

Superlevel Sets

σ−algebras let us take limits of these. That is more interesting!!

Simple FunctionsSimple functions are finite linear combinations of of indicator functions.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 63: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 15

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 64: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 15

Measurable Functions

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 65: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 15

Measurable Functions

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 66: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 15

Measurable Functions

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F)

We say that a function: is measurable with respect to F if:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 67: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 15

Measurable Functions

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F)

We say that a function: is measurable with respect to F if:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 68: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 15

Measurable Functions

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F)

We say that a function: is measurable with respect to F if:

This simply says that a function is measurable with respect to the σ-algebra if all its superlevel sets are in the σ-algebra.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 69: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 15

Measurable Functions

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F)

We say that a function: is measurable with respect to F if:

This simply says that a function is measurable with respect to the σ-algebra if all its superlevel sets are in the σ-algebra.

Hence, a measurable function is one that when we slice it like Lebesgue, we can measure the “width” of the part of the function above the slice. Simple...right?

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 70: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 16

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 71: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 16

Another equivalent way to think of measurable functions is as the pointwise limit of simple functions.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 72: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 16

Another equivalent way to think of measurable functions is as the pointwise limit of simple functions.

In fact, if a measurable function is non-negative, we can say it is the increasing pointwise limit of simple functions.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 73: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 16

Another equivalent way to think of measurable functions is as the pointwise limit of simple functions.

In fact, if a measurable function is non-negative, we can say it is the increasing pointwise limit of simple functions.

This is simply going back to Lebesgue’s picture...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 74: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 17

Intuition behind measurable functions.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 75: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 17

Intuition behind measurable functions.

They are “constant on the sets in the sigma algebra.”

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 76: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 17

Intuition behind measurable functions.

They are “constant on the sets in the sigma algebra.”

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 77: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 17

Intuition behind measurable functions.

They are “constant on the sets in the sigma algebra.”

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 78: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 17

Intuition behind measurable functions.

They are “constant on the sets in the sigma algebra.”

What do measurable functions look like?

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 79: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 17

Intuition behind measurable functions.

They are “constant on the sets in the sigma algebra.”

What do measurable functions look like?

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 80: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 17

Intuition behind measurable functions.

They are “constant on the sets in the sigma algebra.”

What do measurable functions look like?Yes

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 81: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 17

Intuition behind measurable functions.

They are “constant on the sets in the sigma algebra.”

What do measurable functions look like?Yes

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 82: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 17

Intuition behind measurable functions.

They are “constant on the sets in the sigma algebra.”

What do measurable functions look like?Yes Yes

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 83: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 17

Intuition behind measurable functions.

They are “constant on the sets in the sigma algebra.”

What do measurable functions look like?Yes Yes

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 84: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 17

Intuition behind measurable functions.

They are “constant on the sets in the sigma algebra.”

What do measurable functions look like?Yes Yes No

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 85: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 17

Intuition behind measurable functions.

They are “constant on the sets in the sigma algebra.”

What do measurable functions look like?Yes Yes No

Intuitively speaking, Measurable functions are constant on the sets in the σ-alg.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 86: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 17

Intuition behind measurable functions.

They are “constant on the sets in the sigma algebra.”

What do measurable functions look like?Yes Yes No

Intuitively speaking, Measurable functions are constant on the sets in the σ-alg.

More accurately, they are limits of functions are constant on the sets in the σ-algebra. The σ in σ-algebra gives us this.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 87: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 18

“Information” and σ-Algebras.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 88: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 18

“Information” and σ-Algebras.

Since measurable functions are “constant” on the σ-algebra, if I am trying to determine information from a measurable function, the σ-algebra determines the information that I can obtain.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 89: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 18

“Information” and σ-Algebras.

Since measurable functions are “constant” on the σ-algebra, if I am trying to determine information from a measurable function, the σ-algebra determines the information that I can obtain. I measure What is the most information that I

determine about ω?

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 90: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 18

“Information” and σ-Algebras.

Since measurable functions are “constant” on the σ-algebra, if I am trying to determine information from a measurable function, the σ-algebra determines the information that I can obtain. I measure What is the most information that I

determine about ω? The best possible I can do is to say that with

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 91: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 18

“Information” and σ-Algebras.

Since measurable functions are “constant” on the σ-algebra, if I am trying to determine information from a measurable function, the σ-algebra determines the information that I can obtain. I measure What is the most information that I

determine about ω?

σ-algebras determine the amount of information possible in a function.

The best possible I can do is to say that with

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 92: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 19

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 93: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 19

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 94: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 20

Measures and Integration

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 95: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 20

Measures and Integration

A measurable space (Ω,F) defines the sets can be measured.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 96: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 20

Measures and Integration

A measurable space (Ω,F) defines the sets can be measured.

Now we actually have to measure them...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 97: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 20

Measures and Integration

A measurable space (Ω,F) defines the sets can be measured.

Now we actually have to measure them...

What are the properties that “size” should satisfy.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 98: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 20

Measures and Integration

A measurable space (Ω,F) defines the sets can be measured.

Now we actually have to measure them...

What are the properties that “size” should satisfy.

If you think about it long enough, there are really only two...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 99: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 21

Definition of a measure:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 100: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 21

Definition of a measure:Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 101: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 21

Definition of a measure:Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

A measure is a functionsatisfying two properties:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 102: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 21

Definition of a measure:Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

A measure is a functionsatisfying two properties:

1)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 103: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 21

Definition of a measure:Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

A measure is a functionsatisfying two properties:

1)

2)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 104: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 21

Definition of a measure:Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

A measure is a functionsatisfying two properties:

1)

2)

(2) is known as “countable additivity”. However, I think of it as “linearity and left continuity for sets”.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 105: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 22

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 106: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 22

Fundamental properties of measures (or “size”):

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 107: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 22

Fundamental properties of measures (or “size”):

Left Continuity: This is a trivial consequence of the definition!

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 108: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 22

Fundamental properties of measures (or “size”):

Left Continuity: This is a trivial consequence of the definition!

Let then

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 109: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 22

Fundamental properties of measures (or “size”):

Left Continuity: This is a trivial consequence of the definition!

Let then

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 110: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 22

Fundamental properties of measures (or “size”):

Left Continuity: This is a trivial consequence of the definition!

Let then

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 111: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 22

Fundamental properties of measures (or “size”):

Left Continuity: This is a trivial consequence of the definition!

Let then

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 112: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 22

Fundamental properties of measures (or “size”):

Left Continuity: This is a trivial consequence of the definition!

Let then

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 113: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 22

Fundamental properties of measures (or “size”):

Left Continuity: This is a trivial consequence of the definition!

Right Continuity: Depends on boundedness!

Let then

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 114: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 22

Fundamental properties of measures (or “size”):

Left Continuity: This is a trivial consequence of the definition!

Right Continuity: Depends on boundedness!

Let then

Let and for some ithen

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 115: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 22

Fundamental properties of measures (or “size”):

Left Continuity: This is a trivial consequence of the definition!

Right Continuity: Depends on boundedness!

(Here is why we need boundedness. Consider then )

Let then

Let and for some ithen

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 116: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 23

Now we can define the integral.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 117: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 23

Now we can define the integral.

Simple Functions:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 118: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 23

Now we can define the integral.

Simple Functions:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 119: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 23

Now we can define the integral.

Simple Functions:

Positive Functions:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 120: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 23

Now we can define the integral.

Since positive measurable functions can be written as the increasing pointwise limit of simple functions, we define the integral as

Simple Functions:

Positive Functions:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 121: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 23

Now we can define the integral.

Since positive measurable functions can be written as the increasing pointwise limit of simple functions, we define the integral as

Simple Functions:

Positive Functions:

For a general measurable function write

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 122: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 23

Now we can define the integral.

Since positive measurable functions can be written as the increasing pointwise limit of simple functions, we define the integral as

Simple Functions:

Positive Functions:

For a general measurable function write

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 123: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 24

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 124: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 24

How should I think about

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 125: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 24

A

f

How should I think about

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 126: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 24

This picture says everything!!!!

A

f

How should I think about

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 127: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 24

This picture says everything!!!!

A

f

This is a set! and the integral is measuring the “size” of this set!

How should I think about

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 128: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 24

This picture says everything!!!!

A

f

This is a set! and the integral is measuring the “size” of this set!

Integrals are like measures! They measure the size of a set. We just describe that set by a function.

How should I think about

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 129: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 24

This picture says everything!!!!

A

f

This is a set! and the integral is measuring the “size” of this set!

Integrals are like measures! They measure the size of a set. We just describe that set by a function.

Therefore, integrals should satisfy the properties of measures.

How should I think about

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 130: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 25

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 131: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 25

This leads us to another important principle...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 132: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 25

Measures and integrals are different descriptions of of the same concept. Namely, “size”.

This leads us to another important principle...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 133: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 25

Measures and integrals are different descriptions of of the same concept. Namely, “size”.

Therefore, they should satisfy the same properties!!

This leads us to another important principle...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 134: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 25

Measures and integrals are different descriptions of of the same concept. Namely, “size”.

Therefore, they should satisfy the same properties!!

This leads us to another important principle...

Lebesgue defined the integral so that this would be true!

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 135: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 136: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Measures are: Integrals are:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 137: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Left Continuous

Measures are: Integrals are:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 138: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Left Continuous

Measures are: Integrals are:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 139: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Left Continuous Left Continuous

Measures are: Integrals are:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 140: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Left Continuous Left Continuous

Measures are: Integrals are:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 141: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Left Continuous Left Continuous

Measures are: Integrals are:

(Monotone Convergence Thm.)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 142: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Left Continuous Left Continuous

Bdd Right Cont.

Measures are: Integrals are:

(Monotone Convergence Thm.)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 143: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Left Continuous Left Continuous

Bdd Right Cont.

Measures are: Integrals are:

and

(Monotone Convergence Thm.)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 144: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Left Continuous Left Continuous

Bdd Right Cont. Bdd Right Cont.

Measures are: Integrals are:

and

(Monotone Convergence Thm.)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 145: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Left Continuous Left Continuous

Bdd Right Cont. Bdd Right Cont.

Measures are: Integrals are:

and and

(Monotone Convergence Thm.)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 146: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Left Continuous Left Continuous

Bdd Right Cont. Bdd Right Cont.

Measures are: Integrals are:

and and

(Monotone Convergence Thm.)

(Bounded Convergence Thm.)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 147: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Left Continuous Left Continuous

Bdd Right Cont. Bdd Right Cont.

etc...

Measures are: Integrals are:

and and

(Monotone Convergence Thm.)

(Bounded Convergence Thm.)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 148: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 26

Left Continuous Left Continuous

Bdd Right Cont. Bdd Right Cont.

etc...

Measures are: Integrals are:

and and

(Monotone Convergence Thm.)

(Bounded Convergence Thm.)

etc...(Fatou’s Lemma, etc...)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 149: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 27

The Lp Spaces

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 150: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 27

The Lp Spaces

A function is in Lp(Ω,F,µ) if

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 151: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 27

The Lp Spaces

A function is in Lp(Ω,F,µ) if

The Lp spaces are Banach Spaces with norm:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 152: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 27

The Lp Spaces

A function is in Lp(Ω,F,µ) if

The Lp spaces are Banach Spaces with norm:

L2 is a Hilbert Space with inner product:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 153: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 28

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 154: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 28

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 155: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 29

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 156: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 29

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 157: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 29

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

There exist many measures on F.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 158: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 29

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

There exist many measures on F.

If Ω is the real line, the standard measure is “length”.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 159: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 29

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

There exist many measures on F.

If Ω is the real line, the standard measure is “length”. That is, the measure of each interval is its length. This is known as “Lebesgue measure”.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 160: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 29

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

There exist many measures on F.

If Ω is the real line, the standard measure is “length”. That is, the measure of each interval is its length. This is known as “Lebesgue measure”.

The σ-algebra must contain intervals. The smallest σ-algebra that contains all open sets (and hence intervals) is call the “Borel” σ-algebra and is denoted B.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 161: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 29

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

There exist many measures on F.

If Ω is the real line, the standard measure is “length”. That is, the measure of each interval is its length. This is known as “Lebesgue measure”.

The σ-algebra must contain intervals. The smallest σ-algebra that contains all open sets (and hence intervals) is call the “Borel” σ-algebra and is denoted B.

A course in real analysis will deal a lot with the measurable space .

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 162: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 30

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 163: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 30

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 164: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 30

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

A measurable space combined with a measure is called a measure space. If we denote the measure by µ, we would write the triple: (Ω,F,µ).

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 165: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 30

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

A measurable space combined with a measure is called a measure space. If we denote the measure by µ, we would write the triple: (Ω,F,µ).

Given a measure space (Ω,F,µ), if we decide instead to use a different measure, say υ, then we call this a “change of measure”. (We should just call this using another measure!)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 166: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 30

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

A measurable space combined with a measure is called a measure space. If we denote the measure by µ, we would write the triple: (Ω,F,µ).

Given a measure space (Ω,F,µ), if we decide instead to use a different measure, say υ, then we call this a “change of measure”. (We should just call this using another measure!)

Let µ and υ be two measures on (Ω,F), then

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 167: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 30

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

A measurable space combined with a measure is called a measure space. If we denote the measure by µ, we would write the triple: (Ω,F,µ).

Given a measure space (Ω,F,µ), if we decide instead to use a different measure, say υ, then we call this a “change of measure”. (We should just call this using another measure!)

Let µ and υ be two measures on (Ω,F), then

(Notation )

υ is “absolutely continuous” with respect to µ if

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 168: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 30

Given a Measurable Space (Ω,F),

A measurable space combined with a measure is called a measure space. If we denote the measure by µ, we would write the triple: (Ω,F,µ).

Given a measure space (Ω,F,µ), if we decide instead to use a different measure, say υ, then we call this a “change of measure”. (We should just call this using another measure!)

Let µ and υ be two measures on (Ω,F), then

(Notation )

υ is “absolutely continuous” with respect to µ if

υ and µ are “equivalent” if

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 169: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 31

The Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 170: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 31

The Radon-Nikodym Theorem

If υ<<µ then υ is actually the integral of a function wrt µ.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 171: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 31

The Radon-Nikodym Theorem

If υ<<µ then υ is actually the integral of a function wrt µ.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 172: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 31

The Radon-Nikodym Theorem

If υ<<µ then υ is actually the integral of a function wrt µ.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 173: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 31

The Radon-Nikodym Theorem

If υ<<µ then υ is actually the integral of a function wrt µ.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 174: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 31

The Radon-Nikodym Theorem

If υ<<µ then υ is actually the integral of a function wrt µ.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 175: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 31

The Radon-Nikodym Theorem

If υ<<µ then υ is actually the integral of a function wrt µ.

g is known as the Radon-Nikodym derivative and denoted:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 176: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 32

The Radon-Nikodym Theorem

If υ<<µ then υ is actually the integral of a function wrt µ.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 177: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 32

The Radon-Nikodym Theorem

If υ<<µ then υ is actually the integral of a function wrt µ.

Idea of proof: Create the function through its superlevel sets

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 178: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 32

The Radon-Nikodym Theorem

If υ<<µ then υ is actually the integral of a function wrt µ.

Consider the set function (this is actually a signed measure)

Idea of proof: Create the function through its superlevel sets

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 179: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 32

The Radon-Nikodym Theorem

If υ<<µ then υ is actually the integral of a function wrt µ.

Consider the set function (this is actually a signed measure)

Idea of proof: Create the function through its superlevel sets

Choose and let be the largest set such that for all

(You must prove such an Aα exists.)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 180: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 32

The Radon-Nikodym Theorem

If υ<<µ then υ is actually the integral of a function wrt µ.

Consider the set function (this is actually a signed measure)

Then is the α-superlevel set of g.

Idea of proof: Create the function through its superlevel sets

Choose and let be the largest set such that for all

(You must prove such an Aα exists.)

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 181: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 32

The Radon-Nikodym Theorem

If υ<<µ then υ is actually the integral of a function wrt µ.

Consider the set function (this is actually a signed measure)

Then is the α-superlevel set of g.

Idea of proof: Create the function through its superlevel sets

Choose and let be the largest set such that for all

(You must prove such an Aα exists.)

Now, given superlevel sets, we can construct a function by:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 182: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 33

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 183: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 33

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 184: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 34

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 185: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 34

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 186: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 34

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

That is, let be a cts. linear functional.

Then:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 187: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 34

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

That is, let be a cts. linear functional.

Then:

Note, in L2 this becomes:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 188: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 35

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 189: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 35

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

What is the idea behind the proof:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 190: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 35

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

What is the idea behind the proof:

Linearity allows you to break things into building blocks, operate on them, then add them all together.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 191: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 35

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

What is the idea behind the proof:

Linearity allows you to break things into building blocks, operate on them, then add them all together.

What are the building blocks of measurable functions.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 192: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 35

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

What is the idea behind the proof:

Linearity allows you to break things into building blocks, operate on them, then add them all together.

What are the building blocks of measurable functions.

Indicator functions! Of course!

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 193: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 35

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

What is the idea behind the proof:

Linearity allows you to break things into building blocks, operate on them, then add them all together.

What are the building blocks of measurable functions.

Indicator functions! Of course!

Let’s define a set valued function from indicator functions:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 194: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 36

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 195: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 36

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

A set valued function

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 196: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 36

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

A set valued function

How does L operate on simple functions

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 197: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 36

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

A set valued function

How does L operate on simple functions

This looks like an integral with υ the measure!

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 198: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 36

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

A set valued function

How does L operate on simple functions

This looks like an integral with υ the measure!

But, it is not too hard to show that υ is a (signed) measure. (countable additivity follows from continuity). Furthermore, υ<<µ. Radon-Nikodym then says dυ=gdµ.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 199: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 36

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

A set valued function

How does L operate on simple functions

This looks like an integral with υ the measure!

But, it is not too hard to show that υ is a (signed) measure. (countable additivity follows from continuity). Furthermore, υ<<µ. Radon-Nikodym then says dυ=gdµ.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 200: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 37

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

A set valued function

How does L operate on simple functions

This looks like an integral with υ the measure!

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 201: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 37

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

A set valued function

How does L operate on simple functions

This looks like an integral with υ the measure!

For measurable functions it follows from limits and continuity.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 202: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 37

The Riesz Representation Theorem:

All continuous linear functionals on Lp are given by integration against a function with

A set valued function

How does L operate on simple functions

This looks like an integral with υ the measure!

For measurable functions it follows from limits and continuity.

The details are left as an “easy” exercise for the reader...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 203: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 38

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 204: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 38

The Riesz Representation Theorem and the Radon-Nikodym Theorem are basically equivalent. You can prove one from the other and vice-versa.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 205: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 38

The Riesz Representation Theorem and the Radon-Nikodym Theorem are basically equivalent. You can prove one from the other and vice-versa.

We will see the interplay between them in finance...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 206: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 38

The Riesz Representation Theorem and the Radon-Nikodym Theorem are basically equivalent. You can prove one from the other and vice-versa.

We will see the interplay between them in finance...

How does any of this relate to probability theory...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 207: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 39

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 208: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 39

Perspective

σ-Algebras

Measurable Functions

Measure and Integration

Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Riesz Representation Theorem

Measure Theory

Probability Theory

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 209: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 40

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 210: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 40

A probability measure P is a measure that satisfiesThat is, the measure of the whole space is 1.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 211: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 40

A random variable is a measurable function.

A probability measure P is a measure that satisfiesThat is, the measure of the whole space is 1.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 212: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 40

A random variable is a measurable function.

The expectation of a random variable is its integral:

A probability measure P is a measure that satisfiesThat is, the measure of the whole space is 1.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 213: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 40

A random variable is a measurable function.

The expectation of a random variable is its integral:

A density function is the Radon-Nikodym derivative wrt Lebesgue measure:

A probability measure P is a measure that satisfiesThat is, the measure of the whole space is 1.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 214: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 41

A probability measure P is a measure that satisfiesThat is, the measure of the whole space is 1.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 215: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 41

In finance we will talk about expectations with respect to different measures.

A probability measure P is a measure that satisfiesThat is, the measure of the whole space is 1.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 216: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 41

In finance we will talk about expectations with respect to different measures.

A probability measure P is a measure that satisfiesThat is, the measure of the whole space is 1.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 217: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 41

In finance we will talk about expectations with respect to different measures.

A probability measure P is a measure that satisfiesThat is, the measure of the whole space is 1.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 218: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 41

In finance we will talk about expectations with respect to different measures.

A probability measure P is a measure that satisfiesThat is, the measure of the whole space is 1.

And write expectations in terms of the different measures:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 219: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 41

In finance we will talk about expectations with respect to different measures.

A probability measure P is a measure that satisfiesThat is, the measure of the whole space is 1.

And write expectations in terms of the different measures:

Monday, March 19, 2012

Page 220: MeasureTheory Demystified

Primbs, MS&E345 41

In finance we will talk about expectations with respect to different measures.

A probability measure P is a measure that satisfiesThat is, the measure of the whole space is 1.

where or

And write expectations in terms of the different measures:

Monday, March 19, 2012