mdst 3703 f10 seminar 14

33
Seminar 14 Scholarship vs. Stupidity Introduction to the Digital Liberal Arts MDST 3703 / 7703 Fall 2010

Upload: rafael-alvarado

Post on 11-Nov-2014

345 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Seminar 14 Scholarship vs. Stupidity

Introduction to the Digital Liberal ArtsMDST 3703 / 7703

Fall 2010

Page 2: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Business

• Last studio coming up• Lightening talks next Tuesday

Page 3: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Review

Database as Symbolic form• A symbolic form is associated with a mode of thinking• The database is associated with lists and network

structures • The database mode is in conflict with narrativeVertov’s film is an example of “database” narrative• An attempt to resolve the conflict • Projects the conditions of its own production—its

implicit world—onto the plane of narrative

Page 4: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Overview

• Today we entertain the question of stupidity– A theme raised by Tufte and Carr– Goes back to Socrates in the Phaedrus

• Does the form of the database make us stupid?– In particular, Google – In particular, with respect to scholarship

Page 5: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

What is intelligence?

What are the attributes of scholarly intelligence?

Page 6: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14
Page 7: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14
Page 8: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Scholarly Intelligence

• Knowledge of many facts and ideas– i.e. well read

• Ability to perceive patterns• Ability to draw analogies and connections• Ability to develop explanatory models• Ability to develop extended arguments• Ability to revise and critique received

arguments

Page 9: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

How are these abilities developed?

What factors contribute?

Page 10: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Locus of Memory(Where is memory?)

Intelligence requires the integration of human memory with media

Page 11: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

http://cgea.wikispaces.com/Aboriginal+Sacred+and+ceremonial+objects

Page 12: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14
Page 13: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14
Page 14: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14
Page 15: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Most mentioned people and organizations in NYTimes from 1984-2009

http://www.porhomme.com/2009/02/visualized-most-mentioned-people-orgs-nytimes-1984-2009/

Page 16: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14
Page 17: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Carr’s Argument

Can be read as an effect of the database on cognition

• The Internet is an expression of database logicThe form of internet, epitomized by Google,

encourages fragmented, unconnected thinking• Information is produced and consumed in small

piecesAnd: Google itself – as the Master Database of

the Internet – is becoming more connected and less fragmented

• Google itself is becoming the locus of memory

Page 18: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14
Page 19: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14
Page 20: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Google’s algorithm

Page 21: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

What is Shirky’s response?

Page 22: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Shirky

• Shifts focus from consumption to production– Carr focuses on reading– Shirky focuses on writing, media production– Also, Shirky focuses on TV ...

• Notes trend: lowered thresholds of production mean greater production of collection knowledge, e.g.– PatientsLikeMe– Open Source software (Linux, Apache, etc.)

Page 23: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Shirky

Also shifts our attention to the social• Social organization as a solution to the negative

effects of new media• Open source and Internet culture are forms of

social organization that make society smarterWhereas Carr sees a shift in intelligence from the

individual to Google, Shirky envisions a massive division of knowledge labor

• Are both right?

Page 24: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

What premises do Carr and Shirky share?

Page 25: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Shared Premises

Neuroplasticity• Writing is cultural, rewires the brain• The internet is rewiring tooExternalization of knowledge• Locus of memory shifts from individual minds

to the collective• This externalization is having an effect on brainsThey differ in their evaluation of this process

Page 26: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Neuroplasticity

Page 27: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

“We were never born to read”

Our brains evolved for aural–oral language but not for extracting meaning from print.

Reading is a relatively recent cultural invention, on the order of 5000 years old.The brain appears to learn to

read by borrowing networks that evolved for other purposes. Visual object-processing systems [designed for other purposes] are called on to link the lines and squiggles of the letters in front of you right now to the phonological aspects of spoken language.

Our aural–oral language networks interact with these visual processing networks to instantiate skilled reading. Our executive function networks interact with language and visual processing networks to facilitate the transition to automatic reading. Only when reading becomes automatic does reader have time to fully process the information in the text.

From a review of Proust and the Squid by Bradley Schlaggar, N Engl J Med 2008; 358:538-539January 31, 2008

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMbkrev59155

Maryanne Wolf

Page 28: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14
Page 29: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Is all “rewiring” equal?

Page 30: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Externalization

Page 31: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

Internal vs External Memory

INTERNAL EXTERNAL

Deep ReadingDeveloped selves

MultitaskingIncreased production and

access to information

Cognitive elitismOver-valuing of text

Alienated knowledgeBecoming the Borg?

Page 32: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

What kind of knowledge does each system produce?

Page 33: MDST 3703 F10 Seminar 14

What new forms of narratives (selves) shall we create?

Can we learn from Vertov, Borges, and Picasso?