maximizing your local control funding formula
DESCRIPTION
Maximizing Your Local Control Funding Formula. Mitchell Aulakh. Overview. All Students. All Students w/ Adjustments. All LI/EL Students. LI/EL Students > 55% of Total. LI : Low Income EL : English Learner. Data Elements. FRPM Eligible. SENR Considerations. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Maximizing Your Local Control Funding Formula
Mitchell Aulakh
1
OverviewGrade Base Funding
Adjusted Rate (10.4% K-3; 2.6% 9-12)
Supplemental Factor
Concentration Factor
Grades K-3 $6,845.00 $7,556.88 $1,511.38 $3,778.44Grades 4-6 $6,947.00 $6,947.00 $1,389.40 $3,473.50Grades 7-8 $7,154.00 $7,154.00 $1,430.80 $3,577.00
Grades 9-12 $8,289.00 $8,504.51 $1,700.90 $4,252.26
2
All Students All Students w/ Adjustments
All LI/EL Students
LI/EL Students > 55% of Total
LI: Low IncomeEL: English Learner
Data ElementsLCFF Data Elements LCFF Data Sources
Total Enrollment SENRNSLP SPRGHomeless SINFFoster SINF, *CDSS DatabaseMigrant SPRGEnglish Learner SINF*Note: the CDE and California Department of Social Services will collaborate to populate data for foster youth. Districts will not need to do anything for the identification of students from this source.
Record Type AcronymSSID Enrollment SENRStudent Information SINFStudent Program SPRG
FRPM Eligible
SENR Considerations
• Active student record as of CBEDS– Pay attention to start and end dates
• Primary enrollments only– EnrollmentStatusCode = 10– Secondary enrollments are not considered– Unique list of students
• Make sure every student that was enrolled as of CBEDS has active record– Most of your apportionment
SPRG Considerations
• Active record– Start and end dates
• ProgramCode– NSLP = 181 or 182– Migrant Ed = 135
• Must have new record for each school year for NSLP
SINF Considerations• Active record– Start and end dates
• PrimaryResidenceCode– Foster = 210– Homeless = 100, 110, 120, or 130
• EnglishLanguageAcquisitionStatus (ELAS)– EL– Fix ALL TBD statuses
SINF Considerations Cont.
• Possible to identify NSLP addresses– Has one student been marked FRPM eligible at
one address, and another student at the same address is not?
• Are there other investigative techniques we can utilize to capture ALL EL/LI students?
Fall Preparations
Snapshot starts
October 2
Certification deadlineDecember 13
Amendment windowFebruary 7
CALPADS Calendar:http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sp/cl/rptcalendar.asp
Submission Strategies
Fall 1
Fall 2
10/2
CensusDay
September
Populatelocaldata
10/31
Uploaddata
12/2
Uploaddata
12/13
Fall 1due
2/21
Fall 2due
Populatelocaldata
CensusDay
2/7
Reviewreports
11/22
Reviewreports
2013 2014
Amendment Window
WHAT CAN YOU DO NOW?
10
Data Data Data• Continually audit your CALPADS data for any
anomalies– All enrollments are taken care of, with primary enrollment
codes– Start and end dates capture all students that it should for
all three extracts (SENR, SINF, SPRG)– All students participating in educational programs have an
active record for that program, especially migrant education and NSLP
– Student information is up to date, including accurate primary residence codes and ELAS
– Do my percentages coincide with historical data?
Breakdowns
*Remember, it’s the unduplicated count of students
Spreadsheet
Grade level included/not included lists
FRPM Eligible but not marked for NSLP
Found at NSLP Address but not NSLP
ELAS is TBD, needs updating
Black text indicates a calculated field independent of any data source