masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

53
Masculinity as a Social and Symbolic Construction in the United States, India, Korea, and Germany: Issues When Creating Cross-Cultural Communication Research James W. Chesebro Thursday, October 18, 2007 Rudolph F. Verderber Distinguished Lecture at The University of Cincinnati

Upload: joshua-schweigert

Post on 24-May-2015

401 views

Category:

Technology


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Masculinity as a Social and Symbolic Construction in the United States, India,

Korea, and Germany: Issues When Creating Cross-Cultural

Communication Research

James W. ChesebroThursday, October 18, 2007

Rudolph F. Verderber Distinguished Lecture at The University of Cincinnati

Page 2: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

PreviewPreview1. Review of the Research Project:

– A. Definition of Masculinity– B. Masculinity as an issue– C. Survey of Literature– The Current Status of the

Study of Masculinity Internationally– D. The PMQ 47 and Its Significance

2. India3. Korea4. Germany5. Conclusions about the Process of Creating Cross-

Cultural Communication Research

Page 3: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

A. Definition of MasculinityA. Definition of Masculinity

Page 4: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged with Seven Language Dictionary (Volume II) (Chincago, IL: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 1986), P. 1387

Page 5: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

B. Masculinity as an IssueB. Masculinity as an Issue

Page 6: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

S. L. A. Marshall, Men Against Fire: The Problem of Battle Command (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 2000). The original book was published in 1947.

Page 7: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 8: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 9: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 10: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 11: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 12: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Michael Ferguson, Idol Worship: A Shameless Celebration of Bale Beauty in the Movies (Sarasota, FL: ST Rbooks Press, 2003; second edition published in May 2004), p.218.

Page 13: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 14: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

C. The Current Status of the Study of C. The Current Status of the Study of Masculinity InternationallyMasculinity Internationally

Page 15: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

John E. Williams and Deborah L. Best, A Multination Study Measuring Sex Stereotypes: A Multination Study (rev. ed.) (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., April 1, 1990).

Page 16: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

John E. Williams and Deborah L. Best, Measuring Sex Stereotypes: A Thirty-Nation Study (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication, 1982). “Adjective Check List” “data were gathered” using the “second edition of the Sex Stereotype Measure” during two different years. “Our first study” was conducted in 1975, and our second study was conducted in 1977 (pp. 22 and 23).

Page 17: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Janet T. Spence and Robert L. Helmreish, Masculinity & Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, and Antecedents (Austin, TX: The University of Texas Press, 1978).

Page 18: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Geert Hofstede and Associates, Masculinity and Feminity: The Taboo Dimension of National Cultures (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1998).

Page 19: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Fred E. Jandt, An Introduction to Intercultural Communication: Identities in a Global Community, 4th ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2004), p. 196.

Page 20: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Geert Hofstede, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997).

Page 21: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Fred E. Jandt, An Introduction to Intercultural Communication: Identities in a Global Community, 4th ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2004)

Page 22: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Stella Ting-Toomey, Communicating Across Cultures (New York: The Guilford Press, 1999).

Page 23: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Stella Ting-Toomey and Leeva C. Chung, Understanding Intercultural Communication (Log Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company, 2005).

Page 24: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

D. The PMQ 47 and Its SignificanceD. The PMQ 47 and Its Significance

Page 25: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

http://jwchesebro.iweb.bsu.edu

Page 26: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 27: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 28: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 29: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 30: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 31: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

U.S

U.S

MaleEroticism Lust Gender-

Related Racial

and National Identities

Gender-Related

Age Identity

Subjective Gender-Identity

Sexual Preference

Idealized Gender

Gender-Related

Sociocultural Roles

Physical Characte-

ristics

Physiological Energy

Male

Page 32: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

U.S

India

MaleEroticism Lust Gender-

Related Racial

and National Identities

Gender-Related

Age Identity

Subjective Gender-Identity

Sexual Preference

Idealized Gender

Gender-Related

Sociocultural Roles

Physical Characte-

ristics

Physiological Energy

Male

Page 33: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

U.S

India

Korea

MaleEroticism Lust Gender-

Related Racial

and National Identities

Gender-Related

Age Identity

Subjective Gender-Identity

Sexual Preference

Idealized Gender

Gender-Related

Sociocultural Roles

Physical Characte-

ristics

Physiological Energy

Male

Page 34: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

U.S

India

Korea

German

MaleEroticism Lust Gender-

Related Racial

and National Identities

Gender-Related

Age Identity

Subjective Gender-Identity

Sexual Preference

Idealized Gender

Gender-Related

Sociocultural Roles

Physical Characte-

ristics

Physiological Energy

Male

Page 35: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

U.S

U.S

Female

MaleEroticism Lust Gender-

Related Racial

and National Identities

Gender-Related

Age Identity

Subjective Gender-Identity

Sexual Preference

Idealized Gender

Gender-Related

Sociocultural Roles

Physical Characte-

ristics

Physiological Energy

Page 36: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

U.S

India

Female

MaleEroticism Lust Gender-

Related Racial

and National Identities

Gender-Related

Age Identity

Subjective Gender-Identity

Sexual Preference

Idealized Gender

Gender-Related

Sociocultural Roles

Physical Characte-

ristics

Physiological Energy

Page 37: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

U.S

India

Korea

Female

MaleEroticism Lust Gender-

Related Racial

and National Identities

Gender-Related

Age Identity

Subjective Gender-Identity

Sexual Preference

Idealized Gender

Gender-Related

Sociocultural Roles

Physical Characte-

ristics

Physiological Energy

Page 38: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

U.S

India

Korea

German

Female

MaleEroticism Lust Gender-

Related Racial

and National Identities

Gender-Related

Age Identity

Subjective Gender-Identity

Sexual Preference

Idealized Gender

Gender-Related

Sociocultural Roles

Physical Characte-

ristics

Physiological Energy

Page 39: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

2. India2. India

Page 40: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 41: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

3. Korea3. Korea

Page 42: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Country-comparison of sexual preferences, gender non-specific –(won diagram)

Page 43: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Country-comparison of sexual role self-perception, gender non-specific –(won diagram)

Page 44: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Country-comparison of relevance of romance, gender non-specific –(won diagram)

Page 45: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Country-comparison of intensity of foreplay, gender non-specific –(won diagram)

Page 46: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

4. Germany4. Germany

Page 47: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Country-comparison of bodily closeness, gender non-specific –(own diagram)

Page 48: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Country-comparison of bounding to gender for emotional psychological satisfaction during sex, gender non-specific –(own diagram)

Page 49: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Never 2 3 4 5 6 Always

U.S.

India

Korea

Germany

Country-comparison of sexual restrictions because of ethnical origin, gender non-specific –(own diagram)

Page 50: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 51: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 52: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final
Page 53: Masculinity as a social and symbolic construction in cinncinati final

Masculinity as a Social and Symbolic Construction in the United States, India, Korea, and Germany:

Issues When Creating Cross-Cultural Communication Research Thursday, October 18, 2007

Rudolph F. Verderber Distinguished Lecture at The University of Cincinnati

James W. ChesebroDistinguished Professor of Telecommunications and

Director of the Department of Telecommunications Master of Arts (Digital Storytelling) Program, Ball State University, Indiana

[email protected]

http://jwchesebro.iweb.bsu.edu