mary hooker, gesci [email protected]

40
MoHEST-MoYAS-GeSCI WORKSHOP Defining ICT Competencies for TIVET Lecturers, Instructors in Kenya Kenya Institute of Education, June 2 nd – 4 th 2010 Mary Hooker, GeSCI [email protected]

Upload: zalman

Post on 24-Feb-2016

64 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

MoHEST-MoYAS-GeSCI WORKSHOP Defining ICT Competencies for TIVET Lecturers, Instructors in Kenya Kenya Institute of Education, June 2 nd – 4 th 2010. Mary Hooker, GeSCI [email protected]. Stages in drafting a Competency Framework. Stage 6: Finalization of Competency Framework. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

MoHEST-MoYAS-GeSCI WORKSHOPDefining ICT Competencies for TIVET Lecturers, Instructors in Kenya

Kenya Institute of Education, June 2nd – 4th 2010

Mary Hooker, [email protected]

Page 2: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Stages in drafting a Competency Framework

Stage 1: Document Review

Stage 2: Field Research

Stage 3: TIVET Workshop

Stage 5: Contextualization and validation

2

Stage 6: Finalization of Competency Framework

Page 3: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

• A focus on the global challenges facing education systems:– Global Agenda of Education for All– Knowledge Economy or Information Society Agenda

• Global challenges identified:– Information is in abundant supply– Technology is changing rapidly– Learners need to keep up with ICT

and continually develop new skill sets– Jobs appear and disappear very quickly

3

Stage 1: Document Review

Challenges

Page 4: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

• Vision 2030• Kenya National ICT Policy• Sector Policy on ICT in Education• Kenya Situational Analysis• ICT-TIVET Landscape• Kenya Institute of Education Curriculum

4

Stage 1: Document Review

Kenya Context

Page 5: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

• ISTE NETS for Teachers Achievement Rubric

• UNESCO ICT Competency Framework• Australia Competencies• Ireland e-Learning Roadmap• EU Competency and Qualifications

Framework

5

Stage 1: Document Review

Framework Examples

Page 6: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Is ICT integration the solution?

ICT is often seen as being a ‘solution’ Delivering relevant quality instructional material Supporting student self directed learning

- anywhere and anytime Enhancing teachers’ /trainers’ skills and knowledge Promoting international collaboration and

networking

But ICT is also part of the fundamental shift in teaching

and learning styles- from didactic to constructivist

They are not the ‘cheap’ solution that many people have argued

(Unwin 2004)

Stage 1: Document Review

Page 7: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

The UNESCO “Information and Communication Technologies in Teacher Education: Planning Guide” (2002) recommends:

“A shift from teacher-centred instruction to learner-centred instruction is needed to enable students to acquire the new 21st century knowledge and skills.”

Stage 1: Document Review

Page 8: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Paradigm shift: Challenging our assumptions about models for training

Transmission One time initial or specialized training ‘Deficit approach’ focusing on content knowledge ‘Technical approach’ focused on work-based practice

Transition ‘Empowerment approach’ focusing on training

professionalism; collaborative practice

Transformation Lifelong learning approach for professional

preparedness, development and research initial preparation structured opportunities for retraining, upgrading and

acquisition of new knowledge and skills continuous support

Increasing capacity for professional autonomyKennedy 2005

Page 9: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Existing Frameworks for ICT use in Training: SITE• SITE (Society for IT and Teacher Education)• http://www.aace.org/siteThree key principles:

Technology should be infused into the entire training programme

Technology should be introduced in contextStudents should experience innovative technology-

supported learning environments • Why are these so often ignored? (Unwin 2004)

Page 10: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

UNESCO Conceptual Framework – ICT use in Learning Adoption of ICT in Learning

• Instructional Approach to Learning What instructional approaches work most effectively with various ICT applications?

• Authenticity of Learning

Which ICT applications can be a springboard for student learning in a real-world context?

• Complexity of Learning What

types of ICT uses support thinking and learning?

All approaches to learning will require different types of Training

Temechgn 2009

Page 11: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

• Identification of key stakeholders

• Institutional visits• National, regional &

international case studies

11

Stage 2: Field Research

Page 12: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Contributions from key stakeholders• MoHEST• MoYAS• GeSCI• KIE• TTIs/YPs• Public/Private• Universities/Colleges • DPs

12

Stage 3: TIVET Workshop

Page 13: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Aspects to be Considered

What

are

the…

Theme(s)

Trends / Issues

Models / Approaches

Tools

Community / Networks

Stage 2: Field Research

Page 14: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

UNESCO ICT Competency Standards

• Designed by UNESCO • To help educational policy-makers and curriculum

developers identify the skills teachers/ trainers need to harness technology in the service of education/ training provision

• Developed in cooperation with Cisco, Intel and Microsoft, as well as the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE)

Stage 4: Development of draft ICT-TIVET framework

Page 15: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

UNESCO ICT Competency Standards for Teachers• Policy Framework• Implementation Guidelines• Competency Standards Modules

• http://portal.unesco.org

Stage 4: Development of draft ICT-TIVET framework

Page 16: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Objectives• A basic set of qualifications that allows teachers/

trainers to integrate ICT into their teaching and learning, to advance student learning, and to improve other professional duties

• A set of guidelines for training providers to identify, develop or evaluate learning materials or training programs in the use of ICT in teaching and learning

• Extending teachers’/ trainers’ professionalism so as to advance their skills in pedagogy, collaboration, leadership and innovative institutional development using ICT

• Harmonizing different views and vocabulary regarding the uses of ICT in training

Stage 4: Development of draft ICT-TIVET framework

Page 17: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

ApproachesConnecting national/ institutional policy with economic development:• Increase the technological uptake of students, citizens,

and the workforce by incorporating technology skills in the curriculum - or the technology literacy approach

• Increase the ability of students, citizens, and the workforce to use knowledge to add value to society and the economy by applying it to solve complex, real-world problems - or the knowledge deepening approach

• Increase the ability of students, citizens, and the workforce to innovate, produce new knowledge and benefit from this new knowledge - or the knowledge creation approach

Stage 4: Development of draft ICT-TIVET framework

Page 18: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Stage 4: Development of draft ICT-TIVET framework

ApproachesComponents

Page 19: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

• The introduction and use of ICT in education proceeds in broad stages that may be conceived as a continuum or series of steps, namely: Emerging, Applying, Infusing, Transforming.

• Each of the successive stages in the continuum gets richer in both technology and pedagogy in terms of quality and complexity.

Temechgn 2009

Stage 4: Development of draft ICT-TIVET framework

Integration in stages

Page 20: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Taking it one step further• Identify the progression across each of the components• Identify the categories within each component• Create a “Emergent” level• Create new statements where gaps are identified• Simplify the terminology to make it more accessible and

universal

20

Stage 4: Development of draft ICT-TIVET framework

Page 21: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

21

GeSCI ICT Development Path Matrix

Page 22: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

ICT Development Path Matrix

http://www.gesci.org/teacher-education-and-icts.html

Page 23: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

ICT Development Path Matrix• The matrix can be used to localize or tailor a development

path for ICT use in training to a particular country, its policies and its current educational conditions.

• The key to moving towards knowledge creation is to leverage current strengths to advance other components in the system

Page 24: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

ICT IntegrationCore technology

ICT use in the classroom as content focus of training

ICT use as core technology for training participation

Learning HOW

Learning VIA

to use ICT ICT

ICT use in the classroom as parts of method, curriculum

and lesson planning

ICT used to facilitate some (non-essential) aspect of

participation

Complementary technologyFigure 1. Two dimensions of ICT integration in Training Programmes Source: Collis and Moonen 2001, cited in Kirschner and Davis, 2003

24

Page 25: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Emerging Stage • Institutions just beginning to explore the

possibilities and consequences of using ICT for institutional management and adding ICT to the curriculum

• Pedagogically speaking, institutions at this stage are still firmly grounded in traditional, teacher-centered practice

Page 26: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Applying Stage • Administrators and trainers use ICT for tasks

already carried out in institutional management and in the curriculum.

• Trainers involve themselves in integrating ICT to acquire specific subject skills and knowledge, beginning to change their teaching methodology in the classroom, and using ICT to support their training and professional development

Page 27: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Infusing Stage • Institutions involved in integrating or embedding

ICT across the curriculum, and in employing a range of computer-based technologies in laboratories, classrooms, and administrative offices.

• The curriculum also begins to merge subject areas to reflect real-world applications

• The trainers use ICT to manage not only the learning of their students but also their own learning

Page 28: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Transforming Stage • Institutions involved in integrating or

embedding ICT across the curriculum, and in employing a range of computer-based technologies in laboratories, classrooms, and administrative offices.

• The emphasis changes from teacher-centered to learner-centered

• Institutions at this stage of training outreach have become centers of learning and excellence responsive to the needs and requirements of the market place and their communities

Page 29: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Technology Literacy

• Increase the technology uptake of students, citizens, and the workforce by incorporating technology skills in the curriculum.

Page 30: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Knowledge Deepening

• Increase the ability of students, citizens, and the workforce to use knowledge to add value to society and the country and the economy by applying it to solve complex, real-world problems

Page 31: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Knowledge Creation

• Increase the ability of students, citizens, and the workforce to innovate, produce new knowledge and benefit from this knowledge

Page 32: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Consolidating the ApproachesICT a core technology

Learning how to

‘Transition’‘Infusing’‘Knowledge deepening’ Training focus on the use of ICT to guide students through complex problems and manage dynamic learning environment

3

‘Transformation’‘Transforming’‘Knowledge creation’Trainers are themselves master learners and knowledge producers who are constantly engaged in experimentation and innovation to produce new knowledge about learning and market practices4 Learning

via useICT

1‘Traditional’‘Emerging’‘Technology add-on’Training focus the use of ICT as an add-on to the traditional curricula and standardized test systems

2‘Transmission’‘Applying’‘Technology literacy’Training focus on the development of digital literacy and the use of ICT for professional improvement

ICT

ICT as complementary technology

Sources: Kennedy, 2005; Olakulehin, 2008; UNESCO, 2008

32

Page 33: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

33

GeSCI ICT Development Path

Matrix Exercise

Page 34: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

ICT Development Path Matrix Exercise• Review the descriptors for each development

area• Mark an “X” on each continuum indicating level

of progress (Left side – “Emerging” Right side – “Transforming.”)

• Circle top three priorities you want to focus on for raising ICT Competency Standards in Kenya for the next 3 years

Page 35: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Exercise Continued Post the RED dot indicating what you consider to

be your first priority on the wall charts at the corresponding location on the continuum.

Post the GREEN dot indicating what you consider to be your second priority on the wall charts at the corresponding location on the continuum.

Post the BLUE dot indicating what you consider to be your third priority on the wall charts at the corresponding location on the continuum.

Page 36: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

Exercise Review1. What patterns do you see and what does this

tell you?2. What seem to be highest ICT development path

priority areas for the total group and what might be the causes?

3. What ICT development path areas seem to be lower priorities and what might this indicate?

Page 37: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

What patterns do you see and what does this tell you?

Page 38: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

What seem to be highest ICT development path priority areas for the total group?

What might be the causes?

Page 39: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

What ICT development path areas seem to be lower priorities?

What might this indicate?

Page 40: Mary Hooker, GeSCI mary.hooker@gesci.org

ASANTETHANK YOU