mandalay resources corporation investor presentation february 2014
Post on 21-Oct-2014
4.373 views
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
DELIVERINGVALUE AND GROWTH
FEB2014
This presentation contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including statements relating to life ofmine production plans and exploration plans and the growth and strategy of Mandalay. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance onforward-looking statements. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by these statements depending on,among other things, that exploration results at Cerro Bayo, Costerfield, and La Quebrada may not meet management’s expectations, that CerroBayo and Costerfield capital, production and operating cost results may not meet current plans, that reclamation costs associated withMandalay’s Furioso property may exceed current estimates, and changes in commodity prices and general market and economic conditions.The factors identified above are not intended to represent a complete list of the factors that could affect Mandalay. Although Mandalay hasattempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can beno assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from thoseanticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Quality Control and AssuranceQuality control and assurance programs are implemented in line with the standards of National Instrument 43-101.
The exploration program at Costerfield is supervised by Chris Gregory (Member, Australian Institute of Geoscientists accredited CharteredProfessional (Mining)), General Manager of Australasian Business Development for Mandalay and a Qualified Person as defined under NationalInstrument 43-101. Mr. Gregory regularly visits Costerfield, supervises the collection and interpretation of scientific and technical informationcontained in this presentation..
The exploration programs on the Cerro Bayo and La Quebrada projects are supervised by Ronald Luethe (Member: American Institute ofProfessional Geologists and an Idaho Registered Professional Geologist), General Manager of Mandalay Chile Ltda. and a Qualified Person asdefined under National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Luethe visits the Cerro Bayo and La Quebrada projects often, supervises the collection andinterpretation of scientific and technical information contained in this presentation.
Dr. Mark Sander (Member: AusIMM), President of Mandalay, has visited the Costerfield, Cerro Bayo, and La Quebrada projects several timesduring 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 and has supervised the preparation of this presentation. He has also visited the Challacollo project in 2013and 2014.
Forward-looking Statements
2
Vision
3
To create exceptional shareholder value through the acquisition of undervalued assets thatcan rapidly become cash generative, self fund exploration, establish and maintain highoperating margins and return cash to shareholders within a planned period of time.Mandalay is committed to operating safely and in an environmentally responsible manner,while developing a high level of community and employee engagement.
Locations and Tradeflows
4
Mandalay Q4 2013 Financial Performance
5
Mandalay Q4 2013 Operational PerformanceQ4, 2013 Q4, 2012
Saleable Silver oz produced 878,542 895,222
Saleable Gold oz produced 12,117 10,927
Saleable Antimony t produced 805 785
*Cash position of US$27.7 prior to purchase of Challacollo mining project in February 2014.
Q4, 2013 Q4, 2012
Net Cash/All-in Cost/oz Ag at Cerro Bayo, USD 6.74 / 11.51 5.17 / 10.71
Net Cash/All-in Cost/oz Au Eq. at Costerfield, USD 850 / 1,085 943 / 1,153
EBITDA, USD million 13.9 28.8
Net Income, USD million 4.4 22.4
Cash and cash equiv. at end of period, USD million* 33.5 17.3
6
Management and Board of DirectorsSenior Management
Board of Directors
Brad Mills, CEO and Executive DirectorFormer CEO Lonminplc, over 30 years of experience in Copper, Gold, PGMs
Mark Sander, President28 years of experience in exploration, strategy and operating improvements
Sanjay Swarup, CFO and Executive DirectorFormer Lonmin plc, over 20 years of industry experience
Belinda Labatte, Corporate SecretaryOver 10 years of experience in capital markets and investment banking
Braam Jonker, Chairman
Peter R. Jones,Independent Director
Tony Griffin,Independent Director
Robert Doyle,Independent Director
Dominic Duffy, COOMining Engineer with extensive technical and operational management experience
**The Company defines EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes and non cash charges/ (income). EBITDA is presented because the Companybelieves it is a useful indicator of relative operating performance. EBITDA should not be considered by an investor as an alternative to net incomeor cash flow as determined in accordance with IFRS.***Annual cash dividend paid quarterly, based on 6% of the Company’s trailing quarter’s gross revenue and the future cash requirements of the Company.
7
Strategy: Rapid Value Generation and Returns
0.320.6
92.2
171.8
166.9
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Increase Revenues ($US MM)
-1.0 1.732.0
79.9
67.7
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Generate Cash(EBITDA - $US MM**)
Focus and ResultsEntry Strategy:Acquire high-quality assets at a low cost relative to ultimate value
Apply management’s extensive operational and exploration expertise to turn around, grow and/or develop the assets
Focus on cash returns to shareholders and prudent use of leverage
Operationally, Mandalay is focused on:High-margin projects where the Company can achieve rapid production ramp-ups from restarts, turn around situations or late-stage development
Early cash flow to fund exploration, growth and operational improvements
Building critical mass through acquisition
Capital strategy: Reduce dilution and return cash to shareholders
Announced dividend policy, currently paying annualized dividend of 6% of gross revenue***
NCIB: Repurchasing up to 5% of the Company from operational cash flow over 1 year 2012 A 2013 A
$3.2
Dividend Payouts ($CAD MM) $10.9
(1) Exercise price: C$0.255 - C$0.83; Expiry date: Dec 7, 2014 - Mar 18, 2018(2) Exercise price: C$0.31 - C$0.465; Expiry date: Nov 30, 2014(3) Assuming US$ 1 = C$ 1.0421(4) As of November 5, 2013, the directors and executive officers of the Corporation, as a group, beneficially owned, or controlled or directed, directly or indirectly, approximately 173,783,259 Common Shares, representing approximately 53.76% of the outstanding Common Shares
Capital Structure and Ownership
8
Major Shareholders(4)
Holders % Shares (Million)
West Face Capital 40.9% 136.9
Plinian + Management 10.7% 35.8
Sprott Asset Management 10.0% 33.5
Silver Standard 3.6% 12.0
Arcourt (Byrne) 3.5% 11.7
Baker Steel 3.3% 11.1
Capital Structure as at February 13, 2014 Millions (Except Share Price Information)
Share price (Feb. 13, 2014 - close) (CAD$) 0.90/shr
Shares Outstanding 334.7
Options(1) 16.1
Warrants(2) 21.0
Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding 371.8
Market Capitalization (CAD$) 310.3
Cash and Cash Equivalents (CAD$) (as of Sept. 30, 2013)(3) 33.5
Total Debt (CAD$) (as of Sept. 30, 2013)(3) 0
Total Enterprise Value (CAD$) 276.8
9
Management Track Record: Execution, Value Creation
Company History and Milestones
2009 Q4 2010 2011 2012 2013Financial/Corporate
• AcquiredCosterfield gold-antimony mine for Mandalay stock
• Listed on TSX mainboard from TSX-V
• Raised $23 million for purchase and restart of Cerro Bayo silver-gold mine
• Announced Normal Course Issuer Bid (“NCIB”) to buy back 5% of Company’s shares
• CompletedSubstantial Issuer Bid; reduced FD share count by 8%
• Completed and Renewed NCIB
• Paid $3.2 million in dividends
• Extended credit facility by $10 million
• NCIB renewed• Paying $10.9 million in
dividends (2013 est.)
Operational • Began Production at Costerfield (Dec 2009)
• Began production atCerro Bayo (Sept 2010)
• Began milling & shipping at Cerro Bayo (Jan 2011)
• Increased production at both projects
• Doubled silver reserves, boosted gold reserves 85%
• Reached design production at both operations
• Extended Costerfield mine life to 4 years
• Began ramp up at Cerro Bayo to 1,400 tpd
• Acquired Challacollo
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500In
dex
(Aug
ust 3
, 200
9 =
100)
Mandalay Resources Peers* Gold Silver S&P/TSX Composite Index S&P/TSX Global Mining Index
Mandalay: 237% (total return)Peers: 130%Silver: 43%Gold: 36%TSX Composite: 27%TSX Mining: -11%
*Peer group includes: Coeur Mining, Endeavour Silver, First Majestic Mines, Fortuna Silver, and Primero MiningShare prices as at February 13, 2014
Q4 2009 - New Management Team (Mills, Sander & Swarup)
Cerro Bayo Silver-Gold Mine
10
Land package 23,096 hectares
Ownership 100%
2013 silver production 3,145,537 oz
2013 gold production 21,482 oz
2014E silver production 3.0 – 3.2 Moz
2014E gold production 23,000 – 27,000 oz
Current throughput / Goal approx. 1,200 tpd / 1,400 tpd (end Q1 2014)
P&P Reserves 2.5 Mt @ 224 g/t Ag; 2.2 g/t Au
Plant recoveries (FY 2013) Ag: 90.9%, Au: 87.8%
2013A Cash costs/oz Ag net Au credits / 2014E
$6.84 / $6 – $8
2014 Planned Exploration
Budget $3 – 4 million
Cerro Bayo Operating Performance
11
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
Q4‐10 Q2‐11 Q4‐11 Q2‐12 Q4‐12 Q2‐2013
Q4‐2013
USD
/ To
nne
Tonn
es Per Qua
rter
Mining Rate and Unit Cost
t Mined Cost/ t Mined
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
Q4‐10 Q2‐11 Q4‐11 Q2‐12 Q4‐12 Q2‐13 q4‐13
USD
/ To
nne
Tonn
es Per Qua
rter
Processing Rate and Unit Cost
t Processed Cost/ t Processed
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
Q4‐10 Q2‐11 Q4‐11 Q2‐12 Q4‐12 Q2‐13 Q4‐13 USD
/ oz Ag Net Byprodu
ct
Oun
ces Silver Per Qua
rter
Saleable Silver Produced & Unit Cost
Ag oz Cost/ oz Ag net Au
12
Cerro Bayo District: Target-rich Land Package
NI43-101 Reserve-Resource veins2013 Infill and Step-Out Drilling
2012 New infill from 2011 Blue Sky successes2013 Scheduled Blue Sky drill targets
2013- Field work to prep for 2014 drilling
Lucia
ChatitoSb Anomaly
Roadside
Brillantes
Cerro Viento
AquilaSinter Hill
Laguna Verde
High level, Madre-Aquila-Meseta
Cerro Bayo
Guanaco
Esperanza
Sb Anomaly
MarcelaRoadside
Cerro Viento
Brillantes
Coigues
LAGUNA VERDE
Emerging Extensions and New Veins Under Laguna Verde
Veins with ReservesSurface Trace
Veins with ReservesUnderground Trace
Target Extensions Under Laguna Verde
Reported Drill Intercepts
Cerro Bayo M&I Resource Growth Net of Depletion
141 Source: Cerro Bayo - Roscoe Postle Associates, Feb. 2014, documented in an independent NI 43-101 report to be filed within 45 days of Feb.13, 2014
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
2010 2011 2012 2013
OZS Ag
END OF YEAR MEASURED PLUS INDICATED RESOURCES
Cerro Bayo M+I Resource Additions vs Depletion (Ag Ozs)
CUMULATIVE DEPLETION Dagny Fabiola Delia NW
Delia SE Marcela Sur Yasna Coyita
Dalila Bianca Trinidad Raul
2.4 XNet Add
Cerro Bayo Resources (1) Resource(t)
Ag Grade (g/t)
Ag(cont. oz)
Au Grade(g/t)
Au(cont. oz)
Measured Resources 411,000 423 5,596,000 3.6 48,000Indicated Resources 1,633,000 308 16,172,000 3.2 167,000M&I Resources 2,044,000 331 21,768,000 3.3 214,000Inferred Resources 433,000 400 5,580,000 3.3 46,000
Cerro Bayo Reserves (1)
Ore (t)
Ag Grade(g/t)
Ag (cont. oz)
Au Grade(g/t)
Au (cont.
oz)Proven Reserves 516,000 283 4,705,000 2.5 41,000Probable Reserves 1,967,000 209 13,197,000 2.1 134,000P&P Reserves 2,483,000 224 17,901,000 2.2 174,000
Costerfield Gold-Antimony Mine: Overview
15
2014 Planned Exploration
Budget $4 – 5 million
Land package 1,293 hectares
Ownership 100%
2013 gold production 28,758 oz
2013 antimony production 3,275 t
2014E gold production 37,000 – 43,000 oz
2014E antimony production 3,000 – 3,300 t
Current throughput / 2014E 400 tpd / 400 tpd
P&P Reserves 420,000 tonnes @ 9.2 g/t Au; 3.6% Sb
Plant recoveries (FY 2013) Au: 89.98%, Sb: 95.37%
2013A Cash cost/oz Au Eq. (US$) / 2014E $819/ $675 – $775
Costerfield Operating Performance
16
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Q4‐09(Dec. only)
Q2‐10 Q4‐10 Q2‐11 Q4‐11 Q2‐12 Q4‐12 Q2‐13 Q4‐13
AUD/ To
nne
Tonn
es Per Qua
rter
Mining Rate and Unit Cost
t Mined Cost/ t Mined
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Q4‐09(Dec. only)
Q2‐10 Q4‐10 Q2‐11 Q4‐11 Q2‐12 Q4‐12 Q2‐13 Q4‐13
AUD/ To
nne
Tonn
es Per Qua
rter
Processing Rate and Unit Cost
t Processed Cost/ t Processed
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
02,0004,0006,0008,000
10,00012,00014,00016,00018,000
Q4‐09(Dec. only)
Q2‐10 Q4‐10 Q2‐11 Q4‐11 Q2‐12 Q4‐12 Q2‐13 Q4‐13
USD
/ Oz Au Eq
.
Oun
ces Pe
r Qua
rter
Au Equivalent Production and Cost
Oz Au Eq. Cost/ Au Eq. Oz
Cuffley Mine Plan
17
Subparallel and adjacent to N-lodeSame mining technique as N-lode
• Long hole stoping 10 m lifts• CRF backfill
Cuffley Lode
N-lode
W-lode
E-lode
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
OZ AuEq.
END OF YEAR MEASURED PLUS INDICATED RESOURCES
Costerfield M+I Resource Additions vs Depletion (AuEq Ozs)
CUMULATIVE DEPLETION Augusta Brunswick Cuffley
18
Costerfield M&I Resource Growth Net of DepletionCosterfield Resources (1)
Categories
Resource(t)
SbGrade
(%)
Sb(cont. t)
Au Grade (g/t)
Au(cont. oz)
Measured 191,000 4.3% 8,000 8.4 51,000 Indicated 605,000 3.7% 22,000 9.6 187,000 M&I 796,000 4.1% 32,000 9.3 238,000
Inferred 569,000 3.8% 22,000 7.4 135,000
Costerfield Reserves (1)
Categories
Ore (t)
SbGrade
(%)
Sb (cont. t)
Au Grade (g/t)
Au (cont. oz)
Proven 71,000 4.4% 3,000 8.3 20,000Probable 350,000 3.4% 12,000 9.4 106,000P&P 420,000 3.6% 15,000 9.2 126,000
1 Source: Costerfield - SRK Consulting (Australia), Feb. 2014, documented in an independent NI 43-101 report to be filed within 45 days of Feb. 13, 2014
3.8 XNet Add
19
Costerfield – Long Section
Challacollo Silver-Gold Project: Overview
20
Land package 4,000 hectares
Ownership 100%
Location 130 km SE of Iquique, Chile
Mineralization Epithermal, oxidized Ag-Au
Elevation approx. 1,500 metres ASL
Resource Indicated: 1 mt @ 242 g/t Ag;Inferred: 4 mt @193 g/t Ag
21
Plan funded from cash flow
• 12 mo Feasibility Study: $7 – $8 millionEnvironmental, community, cultural baselines for permittingDrill 8,000 m for infilling existing Inferred Resource and extensionsResource updateMetallurgical testing– crushing, grinding, agitation leachMine design, plant designCapital and operating costingFinancial case and conversion to reserves
• PermittingSubmission of EIA Q1, 2015Receipt of permits– goal EOY 2015
• Build12 months build (est.) in 2016
• ProductionFirst production – Goal: Q1 2017
Challacollo Development Plan
La Quebrada
22
Next steps:
Drilling for modest expansion of Casa de Piedra
District exploration – new concepts
Basic engineering studies
Conversation for district consolidation
La Quebrada Total Resources(1)
Rock (t) Ag Grade (g/t) Ag (cont. oz) Cu Grade (%) Cu (cont. lb)
Measured 0 0 0 0 0
Indicated 34,800,000 10 11,188,272 0.6% 459,360,000
Measured & Indicated 34,800,000 10 11,188,272 0.6% 459,360,000
Inferred 1,000,000 11 353,652 0.6% 13,200,000
(1) La Quebrada Independent Technical Report filed 16-Aug-2012.
Tugal Pit
Discovery-fuelled Organic Growth – 2013E & 2014E
30
$8-$9 million $6-$7
million
$3-$4million
Capital Expenditure (PP&E)
Capital Development
Capitalized Exploration
1.3 million
2.9 million
3.1 million 3.0 - 3.2 million
0500,000
1,000,0001,500,0002,000,0002,500,0003,000,0003,500,000
2011 2012 2013 2014E
Silver (oz)
12,244
17,08921,482
23,000–27,000
05,000
10,00015,00020,00025,00030,000
2011 2012 2013 2014E
Gold (oz)
6,678
18,036
28,758
37,000–43,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
2011 2012 2013 2014E
Gold (oz)
0
200
400
600
2010 2011 2012 2013
Cu (cont. lbs MM)
Significant M&I Resource Growth (1,2,3,4)
Costerfield Budget and Production(2014E)
Cerro Bayo Budget and Production(2014E)
$11-$12million
$13-$14 million
$4-$5million
Capital Expenditure (PP&E)
Capital Development
Capitalized Exploration1,576
2,481
3,2753,000 –3,300
0500
1,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,500
2011 2012 2013 2014E
Antimony (Sb)
0
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
2010 2011 2012 2013
Ag (cont. oz)
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
2010 2011 2012 2013
Au (cont. oz)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
2010 2011 2012 2013
Sb (cont. t)
1 Source: Cerro Bayo - Roscoe Postle Associates, Feb. 2014, documented in an independent NI 43-101 report to be filed within 45 days of Feb. 13, 20142 Source: Costerfield - SRK Consulting (Australia), Feb 2014, documented in an independent NI 43-101 report to be filed within 45 days of Feb. 13, 20143 Source: Challacollo – Roscoe Postle Associates, Dec. 20, 2013, in a report filed Feb. 7, 20144 Source: La Quebrada – Independent Technical Report filed 16-Aug-2012. 2014E midpoints graphed.
24
Peer Comparison: Production, Cost, Financials
Source: Company reports and BloombergMarket capitalization as at February 13, 2014Ag Eq oz converted at 55/1 Au/Ag. Metal prices: Ag price of $28.92 and Au price of $1,578
P+P Reserves Market Comparables
Ag (oz)
Au (oz)
Other Reserve Grade Ag Eq (g/t)(Au + Ag)
Market Capitalization FD
(CAD$MM)
EPS Last 12M Dividend
Paid/Share
Mandalay Resources 18,250,000 214,000 7,200t Sb 361 334.6 $0.07 $0.03429
Coeur Mining 261,528,000 2,286,000 - 51 1,197.3 ($0.67) $0
Endeavour Silver 23,057,200 222,300 - 253 601.9 $0.26 $0
First Majestic Mines 90,800,000 0 - 161 1,557.9 $0.37 $0
Fortuna Silver 42,700,000 266,100 - 216 640.3 ($0.03) $0
Primero Mining 39,377,000 660,000 - 513 1,015.0 $0.31 $0
2013A Production 9M 2013A Financials
Ag (oz)
Au (oz)
Other Ag Eq (oz)(Au + Ag)
Revenue (US$MM)
EBITDA(US$MM)
EBITDA Margin (%)
Mandalay Resources 3,145,537 50,240 3,275 t Sb 5,886,848 127.8 53.8 42.1
Coeur Mining 17,012,000 262,217 - 31,319,691 577.2 145.9 25.3
Endeavour Silver 6,813,069 75,578 - 10,936,931 208.9 69.9 33.5
First Majestic Mines 10,641,465 10,040 16,000 t Pb+Zn 11,189,291 192.3 78.3 40.7
Fortuna Silver 4,631,264 21,242 19,000 t Pb+Zn 5,790,319 101.0 29.4 29.1
Primero Mining 6,050,000 111,983 - 12,160,276 152.6 71.2 46.7
25
Mandalay Compares Favourably to its Peers
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
P+P Reserve Grade Fully Diluted Ag Eq (g/t)
Mandalay Resources
Coeur Mining
Endeavour Silver
First Majestic Mines
Fortuna Silver
Primero Mining
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
9M 2013 EBITDA Margin
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
Fully Loaded 9M 2013 Cash Cost/Ag Eq oz
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
Market Cap per 2014E Ag Eq Production (oz)
$0.000
$0.010
$0.020
$0.030
$0.040
Last 12M Dividend Paid per Share
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
$18
Market Cap per P+P Reserves (Ag Eq oz)
Market capitalization as at February 13, 2014Ag Eq oz converted at 55/1 Au/AgMetal prices: Ag price of $28.92 and Au price of $1,578
Second highest grade reserves (Ag Eq oz)
Second highest EBITDA margin
Lowest fully loaded cost (Ag Eq oz)
Second lowest market cap per estimated annual production of Ag Eq oz
Second lowest market cap per P+P reserves oz
Highest dividend paid per share
26
Investment PropositionExecution-focused management with track record of acquisition, operational and exploration success, growth and value generationHigh-quality, cash flowing asset portfolio with major exploration upside and full project pipelineStrong balance sheet, self-funding Challacollo development, zero net debt Rapid increase in production and margins through low-capex organic growth and operational efficienciesReturning cash to shareholders and reducing dilution – share buyback program in placeCompany paying sustainable dividend annualized at approximately 5%Continued growth through further acquisitions
DELIVERINGVALUE AND GROWTH
FEB2014
For more information, please contact:
Greg DiTomasoTel: 647.260.1566Email: [email protected] Website: www.mandalayresources.comTwitter: @MandalayAuAg
Numbers may differ slightly from Source documents due to rounding
28
Mandalay ReservesCerro Bayo Reserves (1) Ore
(t)Ag Grade
(g/t)Ag
(cont. oz)Au Grade
(g/t)Au
(cont. oz)Proven Reserves 516,000 283 4,705,000 2.5 41,000
Probable Reserves 1,967,000 209 13,197,000 2.1 134,000
P&P Reserves 2,483,000 224 17,901,000 2.2 174,000
Costerfield Reserves (2) Ore (t)
Sb Grade (%)
Sb (cont. t)
Au Grade (g/t)
Au (cont. oz)
Proven Reserves 71,000 4.4 3,000 8.3 20,000
Probable Reserves 350,000 3.4 12,000 9.4 106,000
P&P Reserves 420,000 3.6 15,000 9.2 126,000
TOTAL RESERVES: 31-December-2013
Ag (cont. oz)
Au (cont. oz)
Sb (cont. t)
Mandalay Proven Reserves 4,705,000 61,000 3,000
Mandalay Probable Reserves 13,197,000 240,000 12,000
Mandalay P&P Reserves 17,902,000 301,000 15,000
1 Source: Roscoe Postle Associates, Feb. 2014 documented in an independent NI 43-101 report to be filed within 45 days of Feb. 13, 20142 Source: SRK Consulting (Australia), Feb 2014, documented in an independent NI 43-101 report to be filed within 45 days of Feb. 13, 2014
29
Mandalay ResourcesCerro Bayo Resources (1) Resource
(t)Ag Grade
(g/t)Ag
(cont. oz)Au Grade
(g/t)Au
(cont. oz)Measured Resources 411,000 423 5,596,000 3.6 48,000Indicated Resources 1,633,000 308 16,172,000 3.2 167,000M&I Resources 2,044,000 331 21,768,000 3.3 214,000Inferred Resources 433,000 400 5,580,000 3.3 46,000
Costerfield Resources (2) Resource(t)
Sb Grade (%)
Sb(cont. t)
Au Grade (g/t)
Au(cont. oz)
Measured Resources 191,000 4.3% 8,000 8.4 51,000Indicated Resources 605,000 3.7% 22,000 9.6 187,000M&I Resources 796,000 4.1% 32,000 9.3 238,000Inferred Resources 569,000 3.8% 22 ,000 7.4 135,000
TOTAL RESOURCES Ag(cont. oz)
Au(cont. oz)
Sb(cont. t)
Cu(cont. lb)
Measured Resources 5,596,000 99,000 8,000 0Indicated Resources 35,372,000 367,000 22,000 459,000,000M&I Resources 40,968,000 465,000 32,000 459,000,000Inferred Resources 30,280,000 221,000 22,000 13,000,000
1 Source: Cerro Bayo - Roscoe Postle Associates, Feb. 2014 documented in an independent NI 43-101 report to be filed within 45 days of Feb. 13, 20142 Source: Costerfield - SRK Consulting (Australia), Feb 2014, documented in an independent NI 43-101 report to be filed within 45 days of Feb. 13, 2014
La Quebrada Resources (4) Resource(t)
Cu Grade (%)
Cu (cont. lb)
Ag Grade (g/t)
Ag(cont. oz)
Measured Resources 0 0 0 0 0Indicated Resources 34,800,000 0.6% 459,000,000 10 11,200,000M&I Resources 34,800,000 0.6% 459,000,000 10 11,200,000Inferred Resources 1,000,000 0.6% 13,000,000 11 400,000
Challacollo Resources (3) Resource(t)
Au Grade (g/t)
Ag Grade(g/t)
Au (cont. oz)
Ag(cont. oz)
Measured Resources - - - - -Indicated Resources 1,030,000 0.4 242 13,000 8,000,000M&I Resources 1,030,000 0.4 242 13,000 8,000,000Inferred Resources 3,900,000 0.3 193 40,000 24,300,000
3 Source: Challacollo – Roscoe Postle Associates, Dec. 20, 2013, in a report filed February 7, 2014.4 Source: La Quebrada – Independent Technical Report filed 16-Aug-2012.
30
Safety, Health, Environment and CommunitySafety & Health Environment & Community Employees
ACTIONS
• Spending on S&H (including safety training) tripled in last two years
• Focus on line management safety leadership, systems and behaviours
• Improved S&H safety processes & compliance
• Implementation of DuPont safety system in 2013 at both operations
• Extensive training and equipping of mine rescue team at Cerro Bayo
• Spent over 200% more in 2012 on environment & community projects as compared to 2011
• Commitment to local purchases & payrolls
• Development of new water & mine waste solutions at Costerfield
• Closure works completion at Furioso Mine Site
• Supplying various workshops for local community at Cerro Bayo
• University scholarships for local school leavers at Cerro Bayo
• Employee selection process improved
• Focus on local hires including management positions
• Increased hours of training in 2012 by +80% as compared to 2011
• High level executive coaching for leadership team
RESULTS
• Consolidated lost time injury frequency rate approximately halved
• Improved return to work performance
• Maintained high levels of attendance at mine sites
• More prosperous local communities
• Reduced impacted land area• Zero incidences of unpermitted
discharge at both operations
• 3 year collective contract signed with Cerro Bayo union in 2012
• Increased presence of local hires among workforce and supervisors
• Reduced employee turnover at mine sites
• More productive employees, leading to lower unit costs
Metal Price Update
31
1,0001,1001,2001,3001,4001,5001,6001,7001,800
01/O
ct/13
07/O
ct/13
13/O
ct/13
19/O
ct/13
25/O
ct/13
31/O
ct/13
06/N
ov/13
12/N
ov/13
18/N
ov/13
24/N
ov/13
30/N
ov/13
06/Dec/13
12/Dec/13
18/Dec/13
24/Dec/13
30/Dec/13
05/Jan/14
11/Jan/14
17/Jan/14
23/Jan/14
29/Jan/14
04/Feb
/14
Au price USD
/oz
GOLD PRICE ‐ DAILY SPOT LME
Actual Au‐Price LME USD
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
01/O
ct/13
07/O
ct/13
13/O
ct/13
19/O
ct/13
25/O
ct/13
31/O
ct/13
06/N
ov/13
12/N
ov/13
18/N
ov/13
24/N
ov/13
30/N
ov/13
06/Dec/13
12/Dec/13
18/Dec/13
24/Dec/13
30/Dec/13
05/Jan/14
11/Jan/14
17/Jan/14
23/Jan/14
29/Jan/14
04/Feb
/14
Ag price USD
/oz
SILVER PRICE ‐ DAILY SPOT LME
Actual Ag‐Price LME USD
9,000
10,000
11,000
12,000
13,000
14,000
01/O
ct/13
07/O
ct/13
13/O
ct/13
19/O
ct/13
25/O
ct/13
31/O
ct/13
06/N
ov/13
12/N
ov/13
18/N
ov/13
24/N
ov/13
30/N
ov/13
06/Dec/13
12/Dec/13
18/Dec/13
24/Dec/13
30/Dec/13
05/Jan/14
11/Jan/14
17/Jan/14
23/Jan/14
29/Jan/14
04/Feb
/14
Sb price USD
/t
ANTIMONY PRICE ‐ DAILY ROTTERDAM WAREHOUSE
Actual Sb‐Price Market USD
2.70
2.90
3.10
3.30
3.50
3.70
01/O
ct/13
07/O
ct/13
13/O
ct/13
19/O
ct/13
25/O
ct/13
31/O
ct/13
06/N
ov/13
12/N
ov/13
18/N
ov/13
24/N
ov/13
30/N
ov/13
06/Dec/13
12/Dec/13
18/Dec/13
24/Dec/13
30/Dec/13
05/Jan/14
11/Jan/14
17/Jan/14
23/Jan/14
29/Jan/14
04/Feb
/14
CU price USD
/lb
COPPER PRICE ‐ DAILY SPOT LME
Actual Cu‐Price LME USD
Antimony Facts
32
140,000 t/y global market• Sold either as metal ingots or various grades of antimony oxides and trioxides• Primary use as fire retardant in fabrics and plastics (trioxides)• Relatively minor uses in electronics, with possible new uses in development, e.g.
in batteries• Ingredient of lead alloys as hardener (antimony metal)• Consumption growth in line with global GDP growth
Market dominated and prices set by China• Declining Chinese mine production as reserves depleted and environmental
controls strengthened, closing marginal mines• Chinese beginning to invest in mines outside China• Two dominant Chinese smelters, only one of which recovers Au
Gold Equivalent Ounces Calculation
33
***Au Eq. oz produced is calculated by multiplying the saleable quantities of Au, Ag, and Sb in the period by the respective average market prices of the commodities in the period,adding the three amounts to get a “total contained value based on market price”, and then dividing that total contained value by the average market price of Au in the period.Average Au price in the period is the average of the monthly LME PM fix, average Sb price is the average of the monthly high and low Rotterdam warehouse prices, and averageAg price is the average of the monthly London Broker’s silver spot price, all reported in www.metalbulletin.com. The monthly commodity prices are calculated as the average of thedaily prices, with holiday and weekend day prices carried forward from the last business day.
Au Eg. oz for each of the low range and high range guidance is calculated by multiplying (i) total Au oz by an assumed US$1,600/oz Au price, (ii) total Ag oz by an assumedUS$32.00/oz Ag price and (iii) total Sb tonnes times an assumed US$12,000/t Sb price, then, in each case, dividing by the assumed US$1,600/oz Au price.
Silver Equivalent Ounces CalculationAg Eq oz converted at 54/1 Au/Ag at metal prices: Ag price of $28.92 and Au price of $1,578.00