http://www.ufodigest.com/article/man-made-global-warming-0716?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+ufodigest/rLZd+(UFO+and+Paranormal+News)

Cultures on the whole are largely emotionally dependent on the

religious world-views that have created them. When we get down

to intimately analysing the psychology ‘behind’ MMGW beliefs,

we soon discover we are dealing with a subsidiary of biblical

myth (end-time/ messianic ethos). Three quarters of those who

‘believe’ in it have never identified or acknowledged the big

difference between MMGW and climate change. This really is the

vital crux of the matter. The ‘big difference’ I highlight here has

unfortunately caught out many good and caring folk who have

simply been unmindful to the major difference at hand!The

climate has always moved through dramatic cycles and some

have been more significant than others. Today we find folks in

one area of the planet crying out for drier weather, whilst others

say: ‘please send the rains this way as our land is parched and

dying’. This summer for instance is set to be the second wettest

in the UK since records began, according to the Met Office. It

never seems to stop raining here. Other lands though are seeing

entire woodlands dry up and die. No one is disputing that this is

occurring!

The question of alleged Man-Made Global Warming (MMGW) is highly divisive to say the least. Like a vicious civil war, it regrettably sets good friends and family against each other. In the following article I shall try to dispel a few popular misconceptions in the sincere hope that greater understanding will develop. Firstly it is vitally important to clarify the crux of the argument; Is the earth's climate progressively changing due to natural causes or is it warming because of human activity?

Do We Live On A Doomed Planet?

The eco advocate: http://crowncapitalmngt.com/rlegislation.html

http://marionyusef.blog.fc2.com/

The big question remains - is this a man-made

problem or is it the result of the planets natural evolution? If it is the

latter then nothing we can do will modify it because Gaia/Mother Nature is far too dominant, certainly far too commanding for

science to find a solution. People who place all their faith in the great God of

Science (like most people these days) hold onto

their sacred MMGW views like religious

fundamentalists hold onto their apocalyptic,

Armageddon position. In effect, many Christians believe in ‘both’ theories of course and unite with the proposal that man is ethically ‘accountable’ for the demise of the planet through MMGW by his

‘sinful’ activities.

Many have become so indoctrinated into a wholesale dependence on science that they have utterly missed the finer points of the debate. They wrongly see science as the ‘Great Redeemer’ and the only solution to what they erroneously ‘think’ needs fixing. They have swallowed the idea that intellect is somehow superior to everything else hook, line and sinker! Science is widely perceived as logical yet it invented the ‘Bomb’, which could annihilate the planet in the first place and is far more dangerous than alleged MMGW. Therefore, if the Bomb was invented by an allegedly rational force then why do the globalwarmists consider science to be so well-judged in essence when depending on it to save us from the spectre of MMGW?

The alarmists appear to think they know ‘better’ than the gods themselves and place contemporary science ‘above’ the will and power of the gods. This is typical human vanity brought about by reliance in the indoctrinated credos of both monotheistic and scientific half-truths. Sadly a subconscious ‘us against them’ mentality has been forged by the alarmists. Anyone who dares to criticise the MMGM belief system is instantly judged to be immoral and perceived as the blasphemous Bad Guy. Nothing could be further from the truth however.

Climate will change yet again when Nature wishes it to do so, regardless of mankind’s fruitless hopes and fears. Mankind’s subconscious guilt complex, over a naturally changing climate phenomenon, will not modify what is occurring on a grand scale. Humanity may wish it to be different but because we are puny in contrast with the enormous natural forces which power the planet we have to learn, to ‘adapt and improvise’ towards the new situation at hand. Pretending science can do something about it is a complete illusion but a nice bandwagon for unnecessary funding for the hundreds of thousands of scientists being churned out by the educational system.