MALAYSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM Revision
out of 38
Post on 23-Aug-2014
Embed Size (px)
<ul><li> law legal system legal pluralism written law, unwritten law etc etc Just refer to your tutorial presentation </li> <li> 1. Straits Settlements 2. Malay States 3. Borneo States </li> <li> Doctrine of imposition/reception -- Penang Whether Penang was a ceded or a settled territory. Regina vWillans Fatimah v Logan InThe Goods of Abdullah Ong Cheng Neo </li> <li> Period of legal chaos Describe the legal system Ahpoe v Kehin </li> <li> Imposition of English Law: Royal Charter of Justice Contents: law, jurisdiction, courts Proviso Effect on local law </li> <li> 2nd RCJ: English law was extended to Malacca and Singapore Identify cases where local custom was recognised Identify cases where local custom was not recognised 3rd RCJ </li> <li> The Malay States were sovereign states Differentiate between SS and Malay States. SS British colonies, Malay State mere protectorates, retained sovereignty. Cases to show sovereignty of Malay States Informal reception of English law: How? British Residents in FMS, Advisors in UFMS Importation of British Indian statues English court system, English trained judges </li> <li> The effect on the lex loci of the Malay States i.e., Islamic law and local customs. The following cases need to be discussed: Mighell v Sultan of Johor (1894) Pahang Consolidated Co. Ltd.VThe State of Pahang (1933); Shaik Abdul Latif & Ors v Shaik Elias Bux (1915) Ramah v Laton (1927); Government of Perak v AR Adam (1914); Mohamed Gunny vVadvang Kuti (1930); Motor Emporium v Arumugam (1933); Leornard v Nachiappa Chetty (1923); and Haji Abdul Rahman v Mohamed Hassan (1917) </li> <li> Formal reception Civil Law Enactment 1937 Civil Law Extension Ordinance 1951 </li> <li> Order L-4 North Borneo Civil Law Ordinance 1938 Application of Laws Ordinance 1949 Application of Laws Ordinance 1951 </li> <li> Describe the legal fiction concocted by English judges on Penang Describe the legal system in Penang during the period of legal chaos Explain the effect of RCJ on local law Compare between modes of reception in SS and MS. Compare the situation before and during British occupation. </li> <li> 1. Legislation 2. Islamic law 3. Custom 4. English law </li> <li> Relationship between Federal and State The 3 lists Types of legislation: Acts, Enactments, Ordinances Parliamentary procedure, types of Bills Preparliamentary Parliamentary Post parliamentary Royal Assent, Gazette Subsidiary legislation purpose, merits, demerits </li> <li> 1. Historical part: Status of Islam before and during British colonisation. 2. Current position: Status of Islam in the Constitution and in current cases. 3. Administration of Islamic law in Malaysia jurisdiction of Syariah Courts -- refer to slides </li> <li> Before the British came Shaik Abdul Latif v Shaik Elias Bux, Ramah v Laton During British occupation Islamic law was recognised in some cases and was not recognised in others. In the Goods of Abdullah Fatimah v Logan Chulas v Kolson Sahrip v Mitchell Ainan v Syed Abu Bakar  MLJ 209 PP vWhite  MLJ 214 Attorney General of Ceylon v Reid  2 MLJ 34 (PC) Martin v Umi Kelsom  MLJ 1 Re Maria Hertogh  MLJ 214 </li> <li> Discuss position of Islam To what extent Islamic principles are recognised by courts today Islam in the Constitution Article 3(1), Article 11, 9th Schedule (comes under State List) Che Omar Che Soh Myriam v. Mohamed Ariff Mohd Habibullah v Faridah DatoTalib Latifah Mat Zin v Rosmawati Sharibun </li> <li> 1. West Malaysia Malay adat Custom of non-Malays Custom of the Aborigines 2. East Malaysia Malay adat Native custom Chinese Custom </li> <li> Malay adat Adat perpatih AdatTemenggong Do courts recognise them? Yes, in certain matters. Eg. Election, harta sepencarian. Give cases. </li> <li> Custom of non-Malays Do courts recognise them? 1. During British occupation 2. After Law reform (M&D) Act 1976 came into force 1. During British occupation? Yes, in certain matters (polygamous union, legitimacy) SixWidows case, Re Ding Do Ca, DorothyYeeYeng Nam No, in others (eg charitable trust) Ong Cheng Neo </li> <li> 2. After Law Reform (M&D) Act? Relevance of custom of non-Malays were substantially reduced. Discuss the Act. Purpose, application, all the important provisions e.g. registration, no retrospective effect, polygamous marriage not recognised,divorce. </li> <li> Custom of the Aborigines Most relevant in matters involving customary land of the aborigines Governed by the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 which enables aborigines to dwell in land areas designated for their exclusive use. Referred to as aboriginal areas (section 6) or aboriginal reserves (section 7). Adong bin Kuwau & Ord v Kerajaan Negeri Johor SagongTasi v Kerajaan Negeri Selangor </li> <li> Malay custom A mixture of Malay adat and Islamic law. In Sarawak, it is codified in the Undang- Undang Mahkamah Melayu (Laws of the Malay Courts) Comes under the administration of the Islamic Council of Sarawak and theSyariah Courts </li> <li> Native custom Courts have enforced native customary law, recognised native customary rights. Cases </li> <li> Non-native custom (Chinese custom) Not recognised unless it is found in legislation. Chan Bee Neo v Ee Siok Choo </li> <li> The applicability of English law in Malaysia in light of S 3 CLA 1956. -very general question.You are required to discuss everything. The contents of S 3: Where there is no written law, apply English law. West Malaysia common law & equity; the cutoff date East Malaysia common law , equity & statutes of general application ; the cutoff dates. The proviso Effect: English law at the cutoff date is binding. Any development after the cutoff date is not binding, merely persuasive But we have the proviso Only apply to civil cases. Common law which is no longer good law is not binding. Dont forget cases! </li> <li> More specific questions: Discuss the significance of the cut-off dates. With reference to the Nepline case, discuss the steps to be taken in determining whether to apply English law to local cases. Question on Malaysian common law. </li> <li> Discuss the scope and the application of section 5 of the Civil Law Act 1956. Support your answer with reference to relevant authorities. also a general question. Contents of S5: West Malaysia except Malacca and Penang cutoff date Malacca Penang Sabah Sarawak cutoff date? merchantile law generally ? -- Nagurdas Purshotumdas, Shaik Sahied v Sockalingam Chettiar Proviso: subject to local statutes Other cases: on the application of the Sale of Goods Act </li> <li> 1. Court system: plural court system; hierarchy. 2. Jurisdictions: civil & criminal; special; original; appellate etc. 3. Special courts/tribunals 4. ADR </li> <li> Why is there a hierarchy of courts? 1. An integral part of the appeal system.Without a hierarchy there could be no appeal. A court hierarchy distinguishes between higher and lower courts. If an incorrect principle has been applied in a lower court, a party to the case should be able to have the dispute reconsidered by a higher court. 2. An integral part of the doctrine of precedent. Some courts are more authoritative than others. A hierarchy ensures that courts are reasonably clear as to which precedent is binding on them. 3. Specialisation the judicial process.The judicial workload is distributed among the various courts by limiting the jurisdiction of each court. </li> <li> Magistrates court First class magistrate Civil & criminal jur Second class magistrate Civil & criminal jur Sessions court Civil & criminal jurisdiction </li> <li> Two High Courts, meaning of local jurisdiction Specific jurisdiction matrimonial & divorce, admiralty, bankruptcy, companies, guardianship, probates, letters of administration. Original jurisdiction Appellate jurisdiction Revisionary jurisdiction and supervisory jurisdiction </li> <li> CJA Section 35. (1) In addition to the powers conferred on the High Court by this or any other written law, the High Court shall have general supervisory and revisionary jurisdiction over all subordinate courts, and may in particular, but without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, if it appears desirable in the interests of justice, either of its own motion or at the instance of any party or person interested, at any stage in any matter or proceeding, whether civil or criminal, in any subordinate court, call for the record thereof, and may remove the same into the High Court or may give to the subordinate court such directions as to the further conduct of the same as justice may require. </li> <li> Appellate jurisdiction only </li> <li> Original jurisdiction Referral jurisdiction Advisory jurisdiction Appellate jurisdiction Leave application </li> <li> SpecialCourt for Rulers Court for Children Industrial Court Tribunal for Consumer Claims </li> <li> What is ADR? Merits and demerits of ADR </li> <li> Who is the AG? Who is the PP? Qualifications for Advocate & Solicitor Exclusive right to appear and plead in all the courts of justice; name on the Roll, practising certificate. Qualifications for Peguam Syarie LegalAid, qualification the MeansTest. </li> </ul>
View more >
MALAYSIAN STANDARD - ipbl.edu.my Quality management system ... This Malaysian Standard is the first revision of ... Compliance with a Malaysian Standard does not of itself confer immunity from legal
Malaysian Journal of Medical Guidelines for Authors [August 20August 2012 Revision The Malaysian Journal of Medical ... signed by the patient or the patient’s parent/legal ... in the system.
MALAYSIAN FEDERALISM – ISSUES AND ACCEPTANCE ?· After the 2008 General Election, ... Malaysian Legal…
HYDROCEPHALIC CHILDREN PRESENTING TO A MALAYSIAN A MALAYSIAN COMMUNITY BASED UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OVER ... (primary insertion versus revision ... 13 years were included as defined by the Malaysian legal system.
Malaysian Standard is the first revision of MS ... Compliance with a Malaysian Standard does not of itself confer immunity from legal ... (HACCP) system