m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · delcan corporation...

102
Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report - Appendices March 2010 Appendix C Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT APPENDIX C - Existing and Future Traffic Operations March 2010

Upload: others

Post on 23-Aug-2020

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

D e l c a n C o r p o r a t i o n

Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit

Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report - Appendices

March 2010 Appendix C

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

APPENDIX C - Existing and Future Traffic Operations

March 2010

Page 2: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

D e l c a n C o r p o r a t i o n

Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit

Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report

March 2010 Appendix C - 2

1. ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODOLOGY FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OF ETOBICOKE-FINCH WEST LRT CORRIDOR

Existing traffic conditions in the corridor have been analyzed using the Synchro 7 software program and its Sim-Traffic microsimulation component to model traffic behaviour on the streets and intersections of the study area. Due to the significance of the operations of the corridor at the interface with Highway 400, a separate detailed microsimulation was carried out in the vicinity of Highway 400 using the AIMSUN program. Results of this separate study are reported in Appendix E.

1.1 General configuration of traffic facilities in the corridor

Existing lane configurations will be maintained by widening the curb-to-curb roadway to establish the new LRT trackway in the median. At some intersections, bus bays will be replaced by the relocated through lanes because bus service will be replaced by the LRT service. These bus bays also function as short right-turn lanes when buses are not present, but right-turn lanes will not be provided in the future in order to: limit road widening impacts upon properties; protect opportunities for enhanced sidewalk, landscape and streetscape amenities, and to keep pedestrian crossing distances at intersections to the minimum width possible.

1.2 Traffic measurement

The traffic capacity and level of service for traffic on an arterial road is typically measured at major signalized intersections during normal morning and evening weekday peak hours where the traffic signal timing (which controls conflicting movements of pedestrians, streetcars, bikes and other vehicles) represents a constraint to traffic flow. When calculating the impacts of the LRT project on traffic capacity along the Finch Avenue West corridor, numerous assumptions have been made, which represent a “worst case scenario” for traffic operations: This method allows the disclosure of a theoretical maximum impact for EA purposes. Actual impacts may be less after mitigation and design interventions. Assumptions for the EFW LRT project and other TTC Transit City lines are as follows:

i) The volume of existing traffic will be unchanged in the future, minus Finch West buses; ii) Additional traffic generated by new, large, approved developments (at the time of the analysis) has been

added; iii) Traffic previously executing left-turn movements into or out of driveways and unsignalized intersections has

been rerouted to adjacent signalized intersections as U-turn movements; iv) LRT vehicles will proceed with the through movement of general traffic on Finch Avenue; v) All left-turn and U-turn traffic manoeuvres from Finch Avenue West will only proceed with a “protected” green

arrow traffic signal phase, to ensure the movements do not conflict with LRT flow; vi) Pedestrian crossing timings have been provided in conformance with City of Toronto standards; vii) Vehicular traffic signal phases have been optimized to achieve the most efficient balance of the remaining

green time during peak hour traffic signal cycles.

The adoption of these assumptions is considered a “worst case scenario” because some portions of the existing single occupancy vehicle drivers are expected to shift to a different mode of transport, primarily the LRT itself, and others will find alternate routes for all or a portion of their previous use of Finch Avenue West. This shift in mode or route also addresses any potential traffic growth which may otherwise have occurred along this corridor in the future.

It is assumed that with the introduction of the LRT in the median, the majority of the Finch Avenue West corridor will maintain two through lanes for general traffic in each direction. The exception is the section of Finch Avenue West in proximity to Highway 400, between Jane Street and Weston Road, where three lanes in each direction have been retained (except under the CPR structure just east of Weston Road, which will narrow to two traffic lanes in each direction). [The Highway 400 portion of Finch Avenue will be discussed later in this section, and, as noted, the analysis is described in detail in Appendix E.]

The level of service for traffic at major intersections is expected to be lower (more congested) than at present with the introduction of the LRT because of the additional U-turn traffic demand in left-turn lanes; the removal of bus bays, which were de facto right-turn lanes; and the removal of “permissive” left-turn movements on Finch Avenue at signalized intersections as a safety feature for the LRT operation. The signal operations on all but the Highway 400 section of the Finch Avenue West LRT corridor have been analyzed using standard software (Synchro 7) with original traffic volumes and traffic signal timings provided by the City of Toronto. Intersection approaches are deemed to be at capacity when the analysis reveals that the average vehicle delay is equal to or exceeds 55 seconds. This condition is commonly expressed as Level of Service (LOS) E and F.

2. EXISTING CONDITIONS

All signalized intersections across the corridor were analyzed, including those mid-block and driveway intersections where LRT stations will not be located. Analysis results are illustrated later in this Appendix. All of the 13 intersections that currently experience at-capacity traffic conditions on Finch Avenue West are expected to continue to do so once the LRT is operational. An additional 8 intersections are also expected to be at-capacity under the future LRT scenario, and are listed in the table below:

Finch Avenue West Peak Hour Intersection Approaches At-Capacity

Cross street Approach Existing Peak Hour With LRT Peak Hours

Yonge Westbound AM AM and PM

Yonge Eastbound AM and PM AM and PM

Talbot Westbound AM

Senlac Eastbound AM and PM

Bathurst Westbound AM and PM

Bathurst Eastbound PM AM and PM

Virgilwood Westbound AM AM

Dufferin Westbound AM and PM AM and PM

Dufferin Eastbound AM and PM

Alness/Champagne Eastbound PM AM and PM

Alness/Champagne Westbound AM and PM

Chesswood Eastbound and Westbound

AM and PM

Page 3: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

D e l c a n C o r p o r a t i o n

Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit

Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report

March 2010 Appendix C - 3

Cross street Approach Existing Peak Hour With LRT Peak Hours

Keele Eastbound AM AM and PM

Keele Westbound AM and PM

Jane Eastbound AM and PM AM and PM

Norfinch/Oakdale Eastbound AM and PM AM and PM

Norfinch/Oakdale Westbound AM and PM AM and PM

Highway 400 northbound off ramp

Eastbound and Westbound

AM and PM

Highway 400 southbound off ramp

Eastbound and Westbound

AM and PM

Signet/Arrow Westbound AM and PM AM and PM

Signet/Arrow Eastbound AM and PM AM and PM

Weston Westbound PM AM and PM

Weston Eastbound AM and PM AM and PM

Islington Westbound AM and PM

Islington Eastbound PM

Kipling Westbound PM

Kipling Eastbound PM

Albion Rd. Westbound PM PM

Albion Rd. Eastbound PM AM and PM

Martin Grove Westbound AM and PM

Highway 27 Westbound AM and PM AM and PM

Highway 27 Eastbound PM

Highway 27 Northbound PM

Humber College Blvd. Northbound AM AM and PM

Humber College Blvd. Southbound AM AM and PM

The most significant impacts are predicted at Bathurst Street, at Dufferin Street and the area immediately west of Dufferin Street (at Alness Street/Champagne Drive and at Chesswood Drive), and at Highway 27.

3. MITIGATION MEASURES CONSIDERED

Mitigation measures have been considered for these locations, and determined to be unfeasible at the locations noted above, with the exception of Highway 27.

a) Prohibition of left-turn/U-turn movements at major intersections This treatment was studied at four intersections along the Finch Avenue corridor, namely at Bathurst Street, Dufferin Street, Jane Street, and at Weston Road. In all cases, the potential alternate routes were anticipated and assessed. In the cases of Bathurst Street and Jane Street, it is predictable that significant volumes of traffic would infiltrate onto local residential streets in the immediate area. At Dufferin Street and at Weston Road, which border industrialized areas and thus are both serving a mixture of traffic including numerous large trucks, the number of alternate routes are limited. Any potential detour would take this traffic to intersections which are already predicted to be at capacity.

b) Provision of new “Downstream” U-turn traffic signals combined with the prohibition of left/U-turn prohibitions The concept is to create new signalized U-turn opportunities for traffic wishing to turn left beyond the major intersection where the left turns are prohibited. In all cases, the creation of such new signals was deemed unfeasible because of the need to accommodate the movement of large tractor trailers which have very broad turning radii, and because of the large number of driveways, other turning movements, and congested traffic conditions in close proximity downstream from the subject intersections.

c) Introduction of double left/U-turn lanes for heavy movements on Finch Avenue The impact of building relatively short double left-turn/U-turn lanes compared to long single left-turn/U-turn lanes was assessed at four major intersections for the following critical approaches: eastbound at Bathurst Street; westbound at Dufferin Street; eastbound at Alness Street; and westbound at Chesswood Drive. In each case, the resultant double turn lane design requires more property takings than the single lane design, and additional road construction costs are also anticipated. The double turn lane design also results in longer crossing distances for pedestrians, and thus a less pedestrian-friendly environment in locations where pedestrian crossing activity is encouraged, and where pedestrian access to LRT platforms is required. Double left turns were considered as a means of keeping the cycle length relatively low due to a relatively shorter left turn phase requirement, and the lower cycle length can be better for both pedestrians and transit. However, double left turns were rejected for the earlier mentioned negative affects

d) Additional traffic lanes at the Highway 27 at Finch Avenue intersection In order to accommodate the irregular alignment of the median LRT trackway, between the east leg of Finch Avenue and the south leg of Highway 27, and the resultant traffic signal phasing to protect the LRT movement and left-turn movements, combined with the additional future development-related traffic in the immediate area, conversion of right-turn lanes to through lanes on Highway 27 is recommended. Also, an additional westbound lane is recommended on Finch Avenue spanning Highway 27, from Westmore Drive to Halesia Drive, The impact of these undertakings at the Highway 27 intersection will be minimal because the limits of the highway property are already set back a significant distance in anticipation of such a future widening, and the rural cross section of Highway 27 will be reconstructed to an urban road profile in conjunction with the construction of the LRT.

4. FINCH AVENUE WEST AT HIGHWAY 400 (JANE TO WESTON)

Additional evaluation and analysis of the section of Finch Avenue West which spans Highway 400 was undertaken to determine the potential impacts of the LRT on the Highway 400 off-ramps, and the current six lane vehicular cross-

Page 4: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

D e l c a n C o r p o r a t i o n

Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit

Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report

March 2010 Appendix C - 4

section of the Finch Avenue roadway. Detailed results of this evaluation are presented in Appendix E: Microsimulation Traffic Modeling Report.

In order to maintain the current level of service for traffic on Finch Avenue in this area, and thus minimize any negative impacts which the median LRT may have on the Highway 400 off-ramps, the following geometric improvements have been proposed, designed and analyzed in conjunction with the construction and operation of the Etobicoke-Finch West LRT.

Widening of Finch Avenue to maintain 3 lanes of general purpose traffic in each direction. In the vicinity of the Highway 400 overpass, this would be accomplished by converting the Highway 400 on-ramp and off-ramp transition lanes to general purpose through lanes;

Realignment of the northbound and southbound Highway 400 right-turn off-ramps so they align with and are controlled by the intersection traffic control signals, and widening each to two lanes; and

Providing 2 westbound left-turn lanes on Finch Avenue West at Signet/Arrow Road.

The micro-simulation analysis of the future traffic operations under this lane configuration was conducted using AIMSUM. The analysis was conducted for the morning peak hour because the volume of traffic exiting Highway 400 is higher in the AM peak, and thus represents the “worst case scenario” for potential impacts on the off-ramps. In addition, the AM peak hour traffic flow on Finch Avenue West is representative of the PM peak hour conditions because there is minimal directional split on Finch Avenue West in this area.

There were nine signalized intersections included within the microsimulation analysis, between Jayzel Drive and Driftwood Avenue. They are listed below:

Driftwood Avenue

Jane Street

York Gate Blvd/Elana Drive

Norfinch Drive/Oakdale Road

Highway 400 Northbound off-ramp

Highway 400 Southbound off-ramp

Signet Drive/Arrow Road

Weston Road

Jayzel Drive

The results of the microsimulation analysis revealed the following:

The geometric improvements mentioned earlier, to maintain three lanes for general traffic for the majority of this section of the corridor, are required to provide a reasonable level of access for general traffic;

The median aligned LRT will be able to provide a faster transit trip through this corridor than the existing bus service in “mixed” traffic flow;

The recommended 70 second cycle lengths for the two Highway 400 off-ramp traffic signals will allow traffic to vacate the off-ramp (on to Finch Avenue) at a sufficient rate to limit the lengths of the queues, so they will not extend so far back as to impact the mainline of Highway 400 during normal operating conditions;

The CPR bridge structure just east of Weston Road is a physical impediment to the continuation of the 3 lane cross section for Finch Avenue, and thus will be a location of increased congestion and delay for general traffic during peak periods;

The heavy peak period general traffic volume on this section of Finch Avenue, in the vicinity of Highway 400, and the use of “protected only” green arrow signal phases to accommodate left and U-turning traffic, requires the deployment of 120-140 second cycle lengths to provide a reasonable traffic flow rate. Coordination of neighbouring traffic signals will likely be ineffectual during peak periods because of the high level of congestion.

The proposed changes to the road geometry at the Highway 400 and Finch Avenue West interchange have been discussed with staff of the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO) and they concur with the proposed design. In addition, the results of the micro-simulation analysis have been reviewed by MTO staff with their concurrence that the introduction of the LRT operation on Finch Avenue West should not negatively impact the mainline traffic on Highway 400 under normal operating conditions. In order to further protect the mainline of Highway 400 from potential queuing on the off-ramps, MTO staff suggests that an additional 50 metres of storage be constructed for the right-turn exit movements.

5. FINCH WEST DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACTS

In addition to the identification of displaced existing traffic (which includes new developments which had recently become occupied), selected significant future developments were included within the future traffic analysis. Consideration of major new developments included the following:

- Medallion mixed use development on the southeast corner of Finch Avenue West at Weston Road;

- Intensification of the retail plaza on the northeast corner of Finch Avenue West at Highway 27;

- Advent healthcare redevelopment on the south side of Finch Avenue West at Virgilwood Drive;

- Finchwood Village Shopping Centre on the northwest corner of Finch Avenue West at Highway 27; and

- 83 Finch Avenue West mixed commercial-residential development (south-east corner of Finch and Talbot).

Details respecting the development of the draft Emery Village Transportation Master Plan were reviewed in the context of the LRT alignment and operations. The master plan recommendations acknowledge the future median alignment of the Etobicoke-Finch West LRT through the study area.

Page 5: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 6: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 7: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 8: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 9: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 10: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 11: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 12: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 13: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 14: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 15: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 16: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 17: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 18: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 19: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 20: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 21: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 22: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 23: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 24: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 25: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 26: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit
Page 27: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 20091: Finch Avenue & Yonge Street

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 98 678 257 98 745 163 189 1322 152 105 1492 78Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.8 3.6 2.9 3.6 3.1 4.0 2.8 3.5 3.7 3.2 3.6 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1421 2886 1424 2760 1480 4250 1520 4510Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.10 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 181 2886 182 2760 156 4250 160 4510Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 107 737 279 107 810 177 205 1437 165 114 1622 85RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 40 0 0 19 0 0 14 0 0 5 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 107 976 0 107 968 0 205 1588 0 114 1702 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 145 76 76 145 182 604 604 182Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 6% 4% 14% 6% 3% 0% 2% 9% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt pm+ptProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 37.0 33.0 37.0 33.0 47.0 40.0 47.0 40.0Effective Green, g (s) 37.0 33.0 37.0 33.0 47.0 40.0 47.0 40.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.33 0.37 0.33 0.47 0.40 0.47 0.40Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 117 952 117 911 166 1700 170 1804v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 0.34 0.04 c0.35 c0.09 0.37 0.05 0.38v/s Ratio Perm 0.30 0.30 c0.49 0.27v/c Ratio 0.91 1.03 0.91 1.06 1.23 0.93 0.67 0.94Uniform Delay, d1 28.8 33.5 29.0 33.5 23.0 28.7 19.5 28.9Progression Factor 1.28 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 58.1 34.2 62.6 48.0 146.8 11.0 19.1 11.4Delay (s) 94.9 60.9 91.6 81.5 169.8 39.7 38.5 40.4Level of Service F E F F F D D DApproach Delay (s) 64.2 82.5 54.5 40.2Approach LOS E F D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 57.1 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.15Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.7% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 20092: Finch Avenue & Greenview

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 18 1075 29 18 1048 15 80 8 32 28 13 22Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1785 3494 1817 3496 1759 2950 1699 3036Flt Permitted 0.20 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.73 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 373 3494 356 3496 1353 2950 1300 3036Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 20 1168 32 20 1139 16 87 9 35 30 14 24RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 26 0 0 18 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 20 1198 0 20 1154 0 87 18 0 30 20 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 53 23 23 53 15 18 18 15Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 4% 0% 0% 4% 7% 1% 13% 3% 4% 8% 5%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 67.0 67.0 67.0 67.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0Effective Green, g (s) 67.0 67.0 67.0 67.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 250 2341 239 2342 338 738 325 759v/s Ratio Prot c0.34 0.33 0.01 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.06 c0.06 0.02v/c Ratio 0.08 0.51 0.08 0.49 0.26 0.02 0.09 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 5.8 8.3 5.8 8.1 30.1 28.3 28.8 28.3Progression Factor 1.51 1.42 1.25 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.7 0.1 0.1 1.8 0.1 0.6 0.1Delay (s) 9.3 12.5 7.3 8.3 31.9 28.4 29.4 28.4Level of Service A B A A C C C CApproach Delay (s) 12.4 8.3 30.7 28.8Approach LOS B A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 11.9 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 28: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 20093: Finch Avenue & Talbot Road

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 3

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 103 1017 0 10 1502 45 4 0 0 118 0 143Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.9 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.3 2.9 3.7 4.8 3.7 3.5 2.7 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1632 3400 1685 3345 1023 1785 1454Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.53 0.76 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 191 3400 425 3345 574 1419 1454Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 112 1105 0 11 1633 49 4 0 0 128 0 155RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 55 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 112 1105 0 11 1680 0 0 4 0 128 100 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 5% 0% 0% 4% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Effective Green, g (s) 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.12 0.12 0.12Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 145 2584 323 2542 69 170 174v/s Ratio Prot 0.33 0.50 0.07v/s Ratio Perm c0.59 0.03 0.01 c0.09v/c Ratio 0.77 0.43 0.03 0.66 0.06 0.75 0.58Uniform Delay, d1 7.0 4.3 3.0 5.8 39.0 42.6 41.6Progression Factor 1.17 0.88 1.29 1.70 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 30.2 0.5 0.2 1.3 1.6 26.1 13.2Delay (s) 38.3 4.2 4.0 11.1 40.6 68.7 54.8Level of Service D A A B D E DApproach Delay (s) 7.4 11.1 40.6 61.1Approach LOS A B D E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.5% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 20094: Finch Avenue & Edithvale

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1 1031 80 191 1126 6 14 0 66 3 1 25Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.2 3.7 3.2 3.7 3.7 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.88Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3578 1601 3550 1691 1513 1654Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.59 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3416 1601 2097 1691 1513 1654Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1 1121 87 208 1224 7 15 0 72 3 1 27RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 23 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1122 68 0 1439 0 15 0 12 0 8 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot custom PermProtected Phases 4 8 2! 6!Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 76.0 76.0 76.0 16.0 16.0 16.0Effective Green, g (s) 76.0 76.0 76.0 16.0 16.0 16.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.16 0.16 0.16Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2596 1217 1594 271 242 265v/s Ratio Prot c0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.33 0.04 c0.69 0.01 0.01v/c Ratio 0.43 0.06 0.90 0.06 0.05 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 4.3 3.0 9.2 35.6 35.6 35.5Progression Factor 0.83 0.89 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.1 6.7 0.4 0.4 0.2Delay (s) 4.1 2.8 13.1 36.0 35.9 35.7Level of Service A A B D D DApproach Delay (s) 4.0 13.1 35.9 35.7Approach LOS A B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 10.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15! Phase conflict between lane groups.c Critical Lane Group

Page 29: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 20095: Finch Avenue & Senlac Road

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 5

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 1040 306 191 1066 0 256 0 118 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3380 1617 1825 3444 1772 1601Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.23 1.00 0.76 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3380 1617 449 3444 1412 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1130 333 208 1159 0 278 0 128 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1130 250 208 1159 0 278 15 0 0 0 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 8% 1% 0% 6% 0% 3% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 12.0 12.0Effective Green, g (s) 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 12.0 12.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.12 0.12Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2535 1213 337 2583 169 192v/s Ratio Prot 0.33 0.34 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 c0.46 c0.20v/c Ratio 0.45 0.21 0.62 0.45 1.64 0.08Uniform Delay, d1 4.7 3.7 5.8 4.7 44.0 39.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.31 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.4 4.7 0.3 315.2 0.8Delay (s) 5.3 4.1 10.7 6.5 359.2 39.9Level of Service A A B A F DApproach Delay (s) 5.0 7.1 258.6 0.0Approach LOS A A F A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 37.7 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 20096: Finch Avenue & Grantbrook

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 6

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 60 1100 1225 59 162 163Sign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 65 1196 1332 64 176 177Pedestrians 10 10 10Lane Width (m) 3.7 3.7 3.7Walking Speed (m/s) 1.2 1.2 1.2Percent Blockage 1 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type TWLTL TWLTLMedian storage veh) 2 2Upstream signal (m) 242pX, platoon unblocked 0.88 0.88 0.88vC, conflicting volume 1406 2112 718vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1374vC2, stage 2 conf vol 738vCu, unblocked vol 1187 1990 405tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 87 9 66cM capacity (veh/h) 509 193 515

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 464 797 888 508 176 177Volume Left 65 0 0 0 176 0Volume Right 0 0 0 64 0 177cSH 509 1700 1700 1700 193 515Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.47 0.52 0.30 0.91 0.34Queue Length 95th (m) 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.4 11.6Control Delay (s) 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 94.0 15.6Lane LOS A F CApproach Delay (s) 1.4 0.0 54.7Approach LOS F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 7.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.1% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 30: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 20097: Finch Ave W & Finchurst

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 7

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 1 1100 10 10 1230 0 10 0 10 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 1196 11 11 1337 0 11 0 11 0 0 0PedestriansLane Width (m)Walking Speed (m/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type TWLTL TWLTLMedian storage veh) 2 2Upstream signal (m) 268pX, platoon unblocked 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76vC, conflicting volume 1337 1207 1888 2557 598 1970 2567 668vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1198 1198 1359 1359vC2, stage 2 conf vol 690 1359 611 1209vCu, unblocked vol 1337 637 1535 2416 0 1642 2430 668tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 100 98 96 100 99 100 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 512 715 253 176 823 149 174 400

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2Volume Total 400 797 11 457 891 11 11Volume Left 1 0 0 11 0 11 0Volume Right 0 0 11 0 0 0 11cSH 512 1700 1700 715 1700 253 823Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.47 0.01 0.02 0.52 0.04 0.01Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.0 0.3Control Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 19.9 9.4Lane LOS A A C AApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 14.6Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 20098: Finch Avenue & Bathurst Street

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 213 861 137 148 922 23 169 822 100 116 922 409Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.5 3.5 2.9 3.0 3.9 3.6 3.0 3.5 3.2 3.0 4.0 2.9Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1509 3368 1432 1652 3622 1553 1668 3433 1513 1636 3625 1460Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 161 3368 1432 223 3622 1553 156 3433 1513 231 3625 1460Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 232 936 149 161 1002 25 184 893 109 126 1002 445RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 75 0 0 10 0 0 71 0 0 154Lane Group Flow (vph) 232 936 74 161 1002 15 184 893 38 126 1002 291Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 6% 4% 2% 3% 4% 1% 4% 2% 3% 4% 2%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 60.0 47.0 47.0 60.0 47.0 47.0 54.0 45.0 45.0 54.0 45.0 45.0Effective Green, g (s) 60.0 47.0 47.0 60.0 47.0 47.0 54.0 45.0 45.0 54.0 45.0 45.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.36 0.36 0.46 0.36 0.36 0.42 0.35 0.35 0.42 0.35 0.35Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 209 1218 518 246 1309 561 169 1188 524 193 1255 505v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.28 0.07 0.28 c0.08 0.26 0.05 0.28v/s Ratio Perm c0.40 0.05 0.24 0.01 c0.38 0.02 0.23 0.20v/c Ratio 1.11 0.77 0.14 0.65 0.77 0.03 1.09 0.75 0.07 0.65 0.80 0.58Uniform Delay, d1 35.0 36.7 27.9 25.0 36.6 26.8 32.6 37.6 28.5 27.5 38.4 34.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 94.9 4.7 0.6 12.8 4.3 0.1 94.9 4.4 0.3 15.9 5.4 4.7Delay (s) 129.8 41.4 28.5 37.8 40.9 26.9 127.5 42.0 28.8 43.4 43.8 39.4Level of Service F D C D D C F D C D D DApproach Delay (s) 55.5 40.2 54.0 42.5Approach LOS E D D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 47.8 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.10Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 31: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 20099: Finch Avenue & Virgilwood Drive

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 21 1186 35 37 1714 33 30 4 24 32 0 30Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.1 3.9 3.4 3.1 3.7 3.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 3.7 4.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.5 6.0 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.93Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1624 3587 1579 1705 3502 1920 1962Flt Permitted 0.08 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.85 0.85Satd. Flow (perm) 140 3587 1579 190 3502 1668 1707Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 23 1289 38 40 1863 36 33 4 26 35 0 33RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 12 0 2 0 0 18 0 0 23 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 23 1289 26 40 1897 0 0 45 0 0 45 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 4% 0% 0% 4% 0% 3% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 56.5 49.0 49.0 56.5 49.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 56.5 49.0 49.0 56.5 49.0 29.0 29.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.49 0.49 0.56 0.49 0.29 0.29Clearance Time (s) 2.5 6.0 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 190 1758 774 221 1716 484 495v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.36 c0.01 c0.54v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.02 0.09 c0.03 0.03v/c Ratio 0.12 0.73 0.03 0.18 1.11 0.09 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 19.9 20.3 13.2 13.1 25.5 25.9 25.9Progression Factor 0.34 0.46 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 2.5 0.1 1.8 56.8 0.4 0.4Delay (s) 8.0 11.8 1.6 14.9 82.3 26.3 26.2Level of Service A B A B F C CApproach Delay (s) 11.4 80.9 26.3 26.2Approach LOS B F C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 51.4 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.9% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200910: Finch Avenue & Torresdale Avenue

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 10

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 34 971 35 29 1492 36 84 0 75 109 3 125Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.8 3.7 3.0 3.6 2.8 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1636 3482 1478 3312 1388 1624 1493 1722 1528Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.00 0.59 1.00 0.70 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 165 3482 345 3312 1388 1012 1493 1275 1528Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 37 1055 38 32 1622 39 91 0 82 118 3 136RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 0 13 0 72 0 0 120 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 37 1091 0 32 1622 26 91 10 0 118 19 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 5% 17% 14% 9% 6% 5% 0% 7% 6% 0% 5%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 73.5 66.0 73.5 66.0 66.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Effective Green, g (s) 73.5 66.0 73.5 66.0 66.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.66 0.74 0.66 0.66 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12Clearance Time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 232 2298 339 2186 916 121 179 153 183v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.31 0.01 c0.49 0.01 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.06 0.02 0.09 c0.09v/c Ratio 0.16 0.47 0.09 0.74 0.03 0.75 0.05 0.77 0.11Uniform Delay, d1 7.1 8.4 4.1 11.3 5.9 42.6 39.0 42.7 39.2Progression Factor 0.90 1.29 1.72 1.16 2.38 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 34.5 0.6 30.6 1.2Delay (s) 7.4 11.3 7.2 13.3 14.0 77.0 39.6 73.2 40.4Level of Service A B A B B E D E DApproach Delay (s) 11.2 13.2 59.3 55.5Approach LOS B B E E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.8% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 32: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200911: Finch Avenue & Wilmington Avenue

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 11

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1026 143 276 1408 168 183Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 4.0 2.8 2.8 4.2 2.7 2.8Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3557 1415 1628 3703 1577 1429Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3557 1415 186 3703 1577 1429Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1115 155 300 1530 183 199RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 91 0 0 0 157Lane Group Flow (vph) 1115 64 300 1530 183 42Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 4% 1% 4% 3% 3%Turn Type Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 4 3 8 2Permitted Phases 4 8 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.0 41.0 67.0 67.0 21.0 21.0Effective Green, g (s) 41.0 41.0 67.0 67.0 21.0 21.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.41 0.67 0.67 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1458 580 463 2481 331 300v/s Ratio Prot c0.31 c0.15 0.41 c0.12v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.28 0.03v/c Ratio 0.76 0.11 0.65 0.62 0.55 0.14Uniform Delay, d1 25.4 18.2 20.7 9.3 35.3 32.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.66 1.54 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.9 0.4 4.7 0.8 6.5 1.0Delay (s) 29.2 18.6 18.4 15.0 41.8 33.1Level of Service C B B B D CApproach Delay (s) 27.9 15.6 37.3Approach LOS C B D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.3% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200912: Finch Avenue & Dufferin Street

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 12

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 31 477 314 234 912 283 255 1440 194 82 1322 22Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.9 3.5 3.6 2.5 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.4 3.9 2.9 3.9 3.4Total Lost time (s) 2.5 7.0 7.0 2.5 7.0 7.0 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1435 3400 1429 1523 3466 1478 1601 4820 1601 5087Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.34 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.07 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 163 3400 1429 547 3466 1478 156 4820 120 5087Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 34 518 341 254 991 308 277 1565 211 89 1437 24RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 137 0 0 171 0 13 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 34 518 204 254 991 137 277 1763 0 89 1460 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 16% 5% 13% 4% 3% 2% 4% 3% 6% 4% 5% 11%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+ptProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 44.5 37.0 37.0 44.5 37.0 37.0 67.5 56.0 67.5 56.0Effective Green, g (s) 44.5 37.0 37.0 44.5 37.0 37.0 67.5 56.0 67.5 56.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.28 0.28 0.34 0.28 0.28 0.52 0.43 0.52 0.43Clearance Time (s) 2.5 7.0 7.0 2.5 7.0 7.0 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 129 968 407 244 986 421 209 2076 193 2191v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.15 c0.06 0.29 c0.12 0.37 0.04 0.29v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.14 c0.30 0.09 c0.57 0.20v/c Ratio 0.26 0.54 0.50 1.04 1.01 0.33 1.33 0.85 0.46 0.67Uniform Delay, d1 32.6 39.2 38.8 41.6 46.5 36.7 32.4 33.2 22.7 29.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.9 2.1 4.4 68.7 29.9 2.0 175.7 4.6 7.7 1.6Delay (s) 37.5 41.4 43.2 110.3 76.4 38.7 208.0 37.8 30.4 31.2Level of Service D D D F E D F D C CApproach Delay (s) 41.9 74.5 60.8 31.1Approach LOS D E E C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 53.9 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.13Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.2% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 33: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200913: Finch Avenue & Alness Street

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 276 1094 22 97 1126 241 29 105 54 228 183 215Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.5 3.6 2.8 3.5 3.3 4.2 4.2 3.7 4.4 4.4 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1636 3368 1615 1551 3368 1531 1750 1765 1854 1784Flt Permitted 0.20 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.55 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 338 3368 1615 336 3368 1531 409 1765 1069 1784Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 300 1189 24 105 1224 262 32 114 59 248 199 234RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 74 0 17 0 0 38 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 300 1189 17 105 1224 188 32 156 0 248 395 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 6% 0% 6% 6% 2% 10% 10% 7% 6% 6% 7%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0Effective Green, g (s) 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 243 2419 1160 241 2419 1100 67 289 175 292v/s Ratio Prot 0.35 0.36 0.09 0.22v/s Ratio Perm c0.89 0.01 0.31 0.12 0.08 c0.23v/c Ratio 1.23 0.49 0.01 0.44 0.51 0.17 0.48 0.54 1.42 1.35Uniform Delay, d1 15.5 6.8 4.4 6.4 6.9 5.0 41.7 42.2 46.0 46.0Progression Factor 0.88 0.97 1.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 132.4 0.6 0.0 5.6 0.8 0.3 22.4 7.1 217.8 178.9Delay (s) 146.0 7.1 6.4 12.0 7.6 5.3 64.2 49.3 263.8 224.9Level of Service F A A B A A E D F FApproach Delay (s) 34.7 7.5 51.6 239.1Approach LOS C A D F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 59.6 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.27Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.2% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200914: Finch Avenue & Chesswood Drive

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 14

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 8 1230 305 90 1291 11 218 4 67 6 0 1Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.3 3.4 3.7 3.0 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.7Total Lost time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 928 3237 1560 3340 1043 844 1685 1507Flt Permitted 0.17 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.71 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 162 3237 192 3340 832 844 1254 1507Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 9 1337 332 98 1403 12 237 4 73 7 0 1RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 1649 0 98 1415 0 237 12 0 7 0 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 88% 5% 9% 8% 8% 0% 73% 9% 100% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Effective Green, g (s) 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 125 2501 148 2581 91 92 137 164v/s Ratio Prot 0.51 0.42 0.01 0.00v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.51 c0.28 0.01v/c Ratio 0.07 0.66 0.66 0.55 2.60 0.13 0.05 0.00Uniform Delay, d1 3.0 5.8 5.8 4.9 49.0 44.3 43.9 43.7Progression Factor 1.46 0.85 0.90 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 1.1 18.3 0.7 752.8 2.9 0.7 0.0Delay (s) 5.3 6.0 23.5 3.8 801.8 47.2 44.6 43.7Level of Service A A C A F D D DApproach Delay (s) 6.0 5.0 616.7 44.5Approach LOS A A F D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 60.3 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.90Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.1% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 34: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200915: Finch Avenue & Driveway

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 10 1571 10 15 1500 5 10 0 5 5 0 10Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.91Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3575 1789 3577 1744 1682Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.87 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 221 3575 196 3577 1576 1620Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 11 1708 11 16 1630 5 11 0 5 5 0 11RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 1719 0 16 1635 0 0 12 0 0 7 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 17.0 17.0Effective Green, g (s) 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 17.0 17.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 171 2763 151 2764 244 250v/s Ratio Prot c0.48 0.46v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.08 c0.01 0.00v/c Ratio 0.06 0.62 0.11 0.59 0.05 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 3.0 5.5 3.1 5.2 39.6 39.5Progression Factor 0.51 0.45 0.80 0.61 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.2Delay (s) 2.1 3.3 3.2 3.7 40.0 39.7Level of Service A A A A D DApproach Delay (s) 3.3 3.6 40.0 39.7Approach LOS A A D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 3.8 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200916: Finch Avenue & Alexdon

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 16

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1542 44 100 1446 1 129Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3564 1789 3579 1789 1601Flt Permitted 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3564 198 3579 1789 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1676 48 109 1572 1 140RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 0 0 0 53Lane Group Flow (vph) 1722 0 109 1572 1 87Turn Type Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2Permitted Phases 8 2Actuated Green, G (s) 86.0 86.0 86.0 16.0 16.0Effective Green, g (s) 86.0 86.0 86.0 16.0 16.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2786 155 2798 260 233v/s Ratio Prot 0.48 0.44 0.00v/s Ratio Perm c0.55 c0.05v/c Ratio 0.62 0.70 0.56 0.00 0.37Uniform Delay, d1 5.1 5.8 4.7 40.2 42.5Progression Factor 1.67 1.21 1.09 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 19.8 0.7 0.0 4.5Delay (s) 9.4 26.8 5.8 40.2 47.0Level of Service A C A D DApproach Delay (s) 9.4 7.1 47.0Approach LOS A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.8 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.9% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 35: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200917: Finch Avenue & Tangiers Road

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 37 1282 108 60 1008 46 52 17 50 51 13 11Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.9 3.7 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.7 2.8 3.6 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.93Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 3454 1566 1614 3312 1601 1461 1489 1549 3139Flt Permitted 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.71 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 436 3454 1566 291 3312 1601 1137 1489 1158 3139Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 40 1393 117 65 1096 50 57 18 54 55 14 12RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 24 0 0 10 0 49 0 0 11 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 40 1393 93 65 1096 40 57 23 0 55 15 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 23 11 11 23Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 8% 2% 8% 9% 2% 10% 0% 4% 4% 0% 9%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 87.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Effective Green, g (s) 87.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 345 2732 1239 230 2619 1266 114 149 116 314v/s Ratio Prot c0.40 0.33 0.02 0.00v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.06 0.22 0.02 c0.05 0.05v/c Ratio 0.12 0.51 0.07 0.28 0.42 0.03 0.50 0.16 0.47 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 2.6 4.0 2.6 3.1 3.6 2.5 46.9 45.3 46.8 44.8Progression Factor 2.84 3.73 8.22 0.98 0.99 1.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.6 0.4 0.0 14.8 2.2 13.2 0.3Delay (s) 7.6 15.1 21.0 5.6 4.0 4.2 61.7 47.5 60.0 45.1Level of Service A B C A A A E D E DApproach Delay (s) 15.4 4.1 53.8 55.2Approach LOS B A D E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 13.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.1% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200918: Finch Avenue & Keele Street

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 18

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 67 1072 193 58 662 290 148 853 146 294 782 55Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.1 3.7 3.7 3.0 3.3 2.6 3.0 3.6 3.2 3.0 3.2 2.6Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.92Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1539 3411 1135 1476 3172 1107 1516 3343 1333 1508 3165 1192Flt Permitted 0.21 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 332 3411 1135 178 3172 1107 307 3343 1333 251 3165 1192Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 73 1165 210 63 720 315 161 927 159 320 850 60RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 97 0 0 168 0 0 91 0 0 37Lane Group Flow (vph) 73 1165 113 63 720 147 161 927 68 320 850 23Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 160 187 187 160 336 88 336 88Heavy Vehicles (%) 10% 7% 18% 14% 10% 9% 10% 8% 3% 11% 9% 11%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 42.0 35.0 35.0 42.0 35.0 35.0 52.0 43.0 43.0 52.0 43.0 43.0Effective Green, g (s) 42.0 35.0 35.0 42.0 35.0 35.0 52.0 43.0 43.0 52.0 43.0 43.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.32 0.32 0.38 0.32 0.32 0.47 0.39 0.39 0.47 0.39 0.39Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 204 1085 361 151 1009 352 244 1307 521 222 1237 466v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.34 c0.03 0.23 0.05 0.28 c0.12 0.27v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.26 0.05 c0.56 0.02v/c Ratio 0.36 1.07 0.31 0.42 0.71 0.42 0.66 0.71 0.13 1.44 0.69 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 23.4 37.5 28.4 26.5 33.1 29.5 19.3 28.2 21.5 23.7 27.9 20.8Progression Factor 0.52 0.76 0.67 1.11 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.4 45.6 1.6 7.7 4.0 3.4 13.2 3.3 0.5 222.3 3.1 0.2Delay (s) 15.5 74.1 20.5 37.1 37.2 47.7 32.4 31.5 22.0 246.0 31.0 21.0Level of Service B E C D D D C C C F C CApproach Delay (s) 63.4 40.2 30.4 86.5Approach LOS E D C F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 55.8 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.23Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.1% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 36: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200919: Finch Avenue & Romfield Lane

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 24 1361 11 7 1068 7 6 3 19 2 7 24Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.5 3.5 2.9 3.7 3.7 2.6 3.7 4.8 3.7 3.7 4.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.91 0.90Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3275 1489 3349 1004 1687 1884Flt Permitted 0.91 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.95 0.99Satd. Flow (perm) 2985 1489 3153 1004 1619 1870Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 26 1479 12 8 1161 8 7 3 21 2 8 26RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 17 0 0 21 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1505 9 0 1169 6 0 14 0 0 15 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 9% 0% 0% 9% 43% 17% 0% 16% 0% 0% 4%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 6 2Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 20.0 20.0Effective Green, g (s) 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 20.0 20.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.18 0.18Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2117 1056 2236 712 294 340v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.50 0.01 0.37 0.01 c0.01 0.01v/c Ratio 0.71 0.01 0.52 0.01 0.05 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 9.4 4.7 7.4 4.7 37.1 37.1Progression Factor 1.70 1.54 1.80 2.60 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.2Delay (s) 17.4 7.2 14.1 12.2 37.4 37.4Level of Service B A B B D DApproach Delay (s) 17.3 14.1 37.4 37.4Approach LOS B B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 16.4 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.3% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200920: Finch Avenue & Sentinel Road

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 20

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 177 1063 97 85 893 125 119 269 81 146 225 140Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.8 3.4 3.2 2.9 3.4 2.9 3.6 4.0 2.4 3.5 4.0 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1612 3268 1442 1632 3152 1432 1770 3549 1513 3410Flt Permitted 0.29 1.00 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.44 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 488 3268 1442 399 3152 1432 828 3549 708 3410Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 192 1155 105 92 971 136 129 292 88 159 245 152RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 26 0 0 87 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 1155 102 92 971 134 129 354 0 159 310 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 8% 7% 2% 12% 4% 2% 3% 1% 18% 5% 3%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 89.0 89.0 89.0 89.0 89.0 89.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Effective Green, g (s) 89.0 89.0 89.0 89.0 89.0 89.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 395 2644 1167 323 2550 1159 68 290 58 279v/s Ratio Prot 0.35 0.31 0.10 0.09v/s Ratio Perm c0.39 0.07 0.23 0.09 0.16 c0.22v/c Ratio 0.49 0.44 0.09 0.28 0.38 0.12 1.90 1.22 2.74 1.11Uniform Delay, d1 3.3 3.1 2.2 2.6 2.9 2.2 50.5 50.5 50.5 50.5Progression Factor 1.20 1.21 1.56 0.52 0.45 0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 0.4 0.1 1.9 0.4 0.2 453.5 126.7 829.8 86.8Delay (s) 6.9 4.1 3.5 3.3 1.7 1.4 504.0 177.2 880.3 137.3Level of Service A A A A A A F F F FApproach Delay (s) 4.4 1.8 260.0 349.8Approach LOS A A F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 90.2 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.6% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 37: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200921: Finch Avenue & Tobermory Drive

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 21

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 21 1572 0 0 1079 79 0 0 0 131 0 65Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.5 3.0 3.7 3.7 3.1 3.5 3.7 4.8 3.7 4.8 4.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.96Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1584 3240 3253 1990Flt Permitted 0.21 1.00 1.00 0.80Satd. Flow (perm) 343 3240 3253 1644Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 23 1709 0 0 1173 86 0 0 0 142 0 71RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 17 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 23 1709 0 0 1254 0 0 0 0 0 196 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 4% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 89.0 89.0 89.0 9.0Effective Green, g (s) 89.0 89.0 89.0 9.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.08Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 278 2621 2632 135v/s Ratio Prot c0.53 0.39v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.12v/c Ratio 0.08 0.65 0.48 1.46Uniform Delay, d1 2.1 4.2 3.3 50.5Progression Factor 2.14 4.26 0.04 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 1.1 0.5 241.1Delay (s) 5.1 19.1 0.6 291.6Level of Service A B A FApproach Delay (s) 19.0 0.6 0.0 291.6Approach LOS B A A F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 29.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200922: Finch Avenue & Driftwood Avenue

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 22

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 12 1235 60 31 959 21 86 47 64 73 68 34Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.4 3.5 3.8 2.4 3.4 3.1 2.9 3.7 3.7 3.2 2.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1337 3305 1461 1534 3461 1495 1585 1499 1612 1382Flt Permitted 0.22 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.68 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 315 3305 1461 195 3461 1495 1144 1499 1147 1382Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 13 1342 65 34 1042 23 93 51 70 79 74 37RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 20 0 0 9 0 45 0 0 16 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 13 1342 45 34 1042 14 93 76 0 79 95 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 17% 8% 13% 2% 2% 2% 5% 28% 9% 7% 24% 9%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 69.0 63.0 63.0 73.0 65.0 65.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0Effective Green, g (s) 69.0 63.0 63.0 73.0 65.0 65.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.57 0.57 0.66 0.59 0.59 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 2.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 253 1893 837 227 2045 883 260 341 261 314v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.41 c0.01 0.30 0.05 0.07v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.03 0.09 0.01 c0.08 0.07v/c Ratio 0.05 0.71 0.05 0.15 0.51 0.02 0.36 0.22 0.30 0.30Uniform Delay, d1 8.4 16.9 10.4 9.9 13.2 9.3 35.7 34.6 35.3 35.3Progression Factor 0.55 1.35 1.16 0.26 0.52 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 1.0 0.1 1.2 0.8 0.0 3.8 1.5 3.0 2.5Delay (s) 4.8 23.8 12.0 3.8 7.6 2.1 39.6 36.1 38.2 37.7Level of Service A C B A A A D D D DApproach Delay (s) 23.1 7.4 37.6 37.9Approach LOS C A D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 19.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 38: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200923: Finch Avenue & Jane Street

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 23

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 103 1091 184 91 1048 76 206 578 121 145 743 87Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.9 3.8 4.6 3.0 3.7 3.3 3.0 3.7 3.7 2.5 3.6 4.4Total Lost time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.68 1.00 1.00 0.68Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1570 3417 1371 1546 4784 1574 3380 1065 1450 3343 1121Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 200 3417 1371 171 4784 304 3380 1065 505 3343 1121Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 112 1186 200 99 1139 83 224 628 132 158 808 95RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 115 0 7 0 0 0 85 0 0 64Lane Group Flow (vph) 112 1186 85 99 1215 0 224 628 47 158 808 31Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 166 88 88 166 190 168 168 190Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 8% 6% 9% 6% 9% 7% 8% 5% 6% 8% 6%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 46.0 38.0 38.0 46.0 38.0 48.0 38.0 38.0 44.0 36.0 36.0Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 38.0 38.0 46.0 38.0 48.0 38.0 38.0 44.0 36.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.35 0.35 0.42 0.35 0.44 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.33 0.33Clearance Time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 183 1180 474 172 1653 248 1168 368 271 1094 367v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0.35 0.04 0.25 c0.08 0.19 0.04 c0.24v/s Ratio Perm 0.21 0.06 0.20 0.31 0.04 0.19 0.03v/c Ratio 0.61 1.01 0.18 0.58 0.73 0.90 0.54 0.13 0.58 0.74 0.08Uniform Delay, d1 21.9 36.0 25.1 24.8 31.6 23.2 28.9 24.6 22.6 32.8 25.6Progression Factor 1.81 0.79 1.08 0.72 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 13.5 26.6 0.8 12.2 2.7 36.7 1.8 0.7 8.9 4.5 0.5Delay (s) 53.2 55.1 28.0 30.0 30.8 60.0 30.7 25.4 31.5 37.3 26.1Level of Service D E C C C E C C C D CApproach Delay (s) 51.3 30.7 36.7 35.4Approach LOS D C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 39.3 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200924: Finch Avenue & Yorkgate Boulevard

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 24

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 219 1335 4 4 1225 24 28 0 5 22 0 221Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.3 3.7 2.9 3.1 3.7 2.8 3.7 3.1 2.6 3.7 2.9Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1604 4685 1665 4610 1581 1525 1263 1460Flt Permitted 0.18 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 307 4685 284 4610 1581 1525 1263 1460Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 238 1451 4 4 1332 26 30 0 5 24 0 240RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 104Lane Group Flow (vph) 238 1455 0 4 1356 0 30 0 1 24 0 137Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 7% 0% 0% 6% 4% 4% 0% 0% 27% 0% 2%Turn Type Perm Perm custom custom custom customProtected Phases 4 8Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 86.0 86.0 86.0 86.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Effective Green, g (s) 86.0 86.0 86.0 86.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 240 3663 222 3604 158 153 126 146v/s Ratio Prot 0.31 0.29v/s Ratio Perm c0.78 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.02 c0.09v/c Ratio 0.99 0.40 0.02 0.38 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.93Uniform Delay, d1 11.7 3.8 2.7 3.7 45.4 44.6 45.4 49.1Progression Factor 1.47 0.13 0.64 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 30.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 2.7 0.0 3.3 58.9Delay (s) 47.8 0.6 1.8 2.0 48.1 44.6 48.7 108.0Level of Service D A A A D D D FApproach Delay (s) 7.2 2.0 47.6 102.6Approach LOS A A D F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 13.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 39: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200925: Finch Avenue & Norfinch Drive

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 25

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 124 1336 452 283 1361 116 162 125 123 109 219 147Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.7 3.7 3.0 2.5 3.5 3.7 3.2 4.6 3.5 2.8 3.1 3.1Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1477 4727 1553 4793 1554 1852 1507 1468 1646 1261Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.45 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 152 4727 160 4793 743 1852 1507 1036 1646 1261Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 135 1452 491 308 1479 126 176 136 134 118 238 160RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 55 0 0 9 0 0 0 95 0 0 116Lane Group Flow (vph) 135 1888 0 308 1596 0 176 136 39 118 238 44Heavy Vehicles (%) 10% 8% 3% 2% 6% 3% 11% 14% 6% 12% 9% 21%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 54.0 41.0 54.0 41.0 38.0 32.0 32.0 34.0 30.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 54.0 41.0 54.0 41.0 38.0 32.0 32.0 34.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.37 0.49 0.37 0.35 0.29 0.29 0.31 0.27 0.27Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 231 1762 243 1786 301 539 438 336 449 344v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.40 c0.15 0.33 c0.03 0.07 0.01 0.14v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 c0.47 c0.17 0.03 0.10 0.03v/c Ratio 0.58 1.07 1.27 0.89 0.58 0.25 0.09 0.35 0.53 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 20.5 34.5 32.7 32.5 29.5 29.8 28.4 28.7 34.0 30.1Progression Factor 1.71 0.83 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 9.3 42.4 147.3 7.0 8.1 1.1 0.4 2.9 4.4 0.8Delay (s) 44.3 71.1 167.1 39.4 37.5 31.0 28.8 31.6 38.4 30.9Level of Service D E F D D C C C D CApproach Delay (s) 69.4 59.9 32.9 34.5Approach LOS E E C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 58.8 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.8% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200926: Finch Avenue & Hwy 400 NB offramp

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 26

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1608 0 0 1114 815 559Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 5142 5142 3471 1601Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 5142 5142 3471 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1748 0 0 1211 886 608RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 1748 0 0 1211 886 608Turn Type FreeProtected Phases 4 8 2Permitted Phases FreeActuated Green, G (s) 71.0 71.0 27.0 110.0Effective Green, g (s) 71.0 71.0 27.0 110.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.65 0.25 1.00Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3319 3319 852 1601v/s Ratio Prot c0.34 0.24 c0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.38v/c Ratio 0.53 0.36 1.04 0.38Uniform Delay, d1 10.5 9.0 41.5 0.0Progression Factor 1.01 2.12 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.2 41.7 0.7Delay (s) 11.0 19.3 83.2 0.7Level of Service B B F AApproach Delay (s) 11.0 19.3 49.6Approach LOS B B D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 26.2 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.2% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 40: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200927: Finch Avenue & Hwy 400 SB off ramp

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 27

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 1270 2003 0 802 1173Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 4521 4902 3404 1555Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 4521 4902 3404 1555Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1380 2177 0 872 1275RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1380 2177 0 872 1275Heavy Vehicles (%) 10% 16% 7% 10% 4% 5%Turn Type FreeProtected Phases 4 8 6Permitted Phases FreeActuated Green, G (s) 71.6 71.6 25.4 110.0Effective Green, g (s) 71.6 71.6 25.4 110.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.65 0.23 1.00Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2943 3191 786 1555v/s Ratio Prot 0.31 0.44 c0.26v/s Ratio Perm c0.82v/c Ratio 0.47 0.68 1.11 0.82Uniform Delay, d1 9.6 12.1 42.3 0.0Progression Factor 0.61 1.03 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.5 66.4 5.0Delay (s) 5.9 12.9 108.7 5.0Level of Service A B F AApproach Delay (s) 5.9 12.9 47.1Approach LOS A B D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 24.1 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.3% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200928: Finch Avenue & Signet Drive

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 28

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 29 1310 134 308 1742 713 66 209 149 164 314 14Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.7 3.5 3.7 2.7 3.2 3.7 3.4 3.1 3.7 3.0 2.6 3.8Total Lost time (s) 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1624 4743 1504 4448 1552 1535 1328 1381 1535 1364Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 0.61 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 167 4743 147 4448 599 1531 1328 881 1535 1364Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 32 1424 146 335 1893 775 72 227 162 178 341 15RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 67 0 0 0 140 0 0 12Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 1559 0 335 2601 0 65 234 22 178 341 3Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 7% 3% 8% 6% 8% 8% 11% 23% 22% 10% 21%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 53.0 41.0 57.0 43.0 26.0 26.0 15.0 41.0 24.0 24.0Effective Green, g (s) 53.0 41.0 57.0 43.0 26.0 26.0 15.0 41.0 24.0 24.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.48 0.37 0.52 0.39 0.24 0.24 0.14 0.37 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 239 1768 249 1739 237 362 181 419 335 298v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.33 c0.17 c0.58 0.03 c0.06 0.08 c0.22v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.53 0.04 0.09 0.02 0.08 0.00v/c Ratio 0.13 0.88 1.35 1.50 0.27 0.65 0.12 0.42 1.02 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 21.4 32.2 32.4 33.5 33.6 37.9 41.7 24.8 43.0 33.7Progression Factor 0.56 0.93 1.45 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 2.2 173.3 225.3 2.8 8.6 1.4 3.1 53.8 0.1Delay (s) 12.2 32.0 220.4 257.2 36.4 46.5 43.1 28.0 96.8 33.8Level of Service B C F F D D D C F CApproach Delay (s) 31.6 253.1 43.9 72.1Approach LOS C F D E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 155.3 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.19Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.8% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 41: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200929: Finch Avenue & Weston Road

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 29

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 86 1037 146 153 986 230 116 502 111 245 569 95Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.1 3.4 3.7 3.2 3.4 3.7 2.6 3.4 3.7 3.3 3.7 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1470 3268 1555 1627 4589 1472 3330 1601 1454 3177Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.32 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 188 3268 1555 196 4589 494 3330 1601 636 3177Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 93 1127 159 166 1072 250 126 546 121 266 618 103RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 111 0 35 0 0 0 63 0 12 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 1127 48 166 1287 0 126 546 58 266 709 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 16% 8% 5% 6% 7% 9% 9% 6% 2% 20% 12% 15%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 39.0 33.0 33.0 43.0 35.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0Effective Green, g (s) 39.0 33.0 33.0 43.0 35.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.39 0.32 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48Clearance Time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 137 980 467 181 1460 238 1604 771 306 1531v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.34 c0.07 0.28 0.16 0.22v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.03 0.29 0.25 0.04 c0.42v/c Ratio 0.68 1.15 0.10 0.92 0.88 0.53 0.34 0.08 0.87 0.46Uniform Delay, d1 26.5 38.5 27.8 27.6 35.5 19.8 17.7 15.3 25.4 19.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.94 0.41 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 23.8 79.5 0.4 8.1 0.8 8.2 0.6 0.2 26.9 1.0Delay (s) 50.3 118.0 28.2 61.6 15.4 28.0 18.2 15.5 52.3 20.0Level of Service D F C E B C B B D CApproach Delay (s) 103.1 20.5 19.4 28.7Approach LOS F C B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 46.6 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.4% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200930: Finch Avenue & Jayzel Drive

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 30

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 7 1117 37 32 1045 8 17 30 2 4 0 5Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.8 3.8 3.7 3.0 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1275 3417 1512 1546 3341 1733 1853 1891Flt Permitted 0.22 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.86Satd. Flow (perm) 300 3417 1512 333 3341 1371 1853 1664Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 8 1214 40 35 1136 9 18 33 2 4 0 5RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 8 1214 29 35 1144 0 18 33 0 0 5 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 29% 8% 8% 9% 8% 0% 3% 0% 9% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 10.0 10.0 10.0Effective Green, g (s) 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 10.0 10.0 10.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.12 0.12 0.12Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 214 2435 1077 237 2380 171 232 208v/s Ratio Prot c0.36 0.34 c0.02v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.02 0.11 0.01 0.00v/c Ratio 0.04 0.50 0.03 0.15 0.48 0.11 0.14 0.02Uniform Delay, d1 3.4 5.1 3.4 3.7 5.0 31.0 31.2 30.7Progression Factor 0.61 0.47 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.6 0.0 1.3 0.7 1.2 1.3 0.2Delay (s) 2.3 3.1 1.0 5.0 5.7 32.3 32.5 30.9Level of Service A A A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 3.0 5.7 32.4 30.9Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 5.0 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 42: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200931: Finch Avenue & Milvan Drive

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 31

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 99 1058 55 16 815 257 69 49 6 106 52 51Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.7 2.4 2.8 3.6 3.3 3.0 3.2 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.1Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1574 3444 1308 1645 3343 1459 1636 1743 1405 1879 1201Flt Permitted 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.72 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 501 3444 1308 370 3343 1459 1239 1743 1062 1879 1201Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 108 1150 60 17 886 279 75 53 7 115 57 55RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 20 0 0 91 0 6 0 0 0 45Lane Group Flow (vph) 108 1150 41 17 886 188 75 54 0 115 57 10Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 6% 7% 0% 8% 7% 3% 0% 20% 27% 0% 27%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0Effective Green, g (s) 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 338 2325 883 250 2257 985 217 305 186 329 210v/s Ratio Prot c0.33 0.27 0.03 0.03v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.03 0.05 0.13 0.06 c0.11 0.01v/c Ratio 0.32 0.49 0.05 0.07 0.39 0.19 0.35 0.18 0.62 0.17 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 5.4 6.3 4.4 4.4 5.7 4.9 29.0 28.1 30.5 28.1 27.4Progression Factor 0.31 0.33 0.13 0.89 0.79 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.4 4.3 1.3 14.5 1.1 0.4Delay (s) 3.8 2.7 0.6 4.4 5.0 3.6 33.3 29.4 45.0 29.2 27.9Level of Service A A A A A A C C D C CApproach Delay (s) 2.7 4.6 31.6 36.9Approach LOS A A C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 7.6 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.1% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200932: Finch Avenue & Duncanwoods Drive

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 32

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 16 1143 4 27 892 27 16 10 62 100 6 31Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.4 3.8 3.0 3.5 3.5 2.9 3.0 3.7 2.7 2.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.88Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 3330 1321 1685 3275 1566 1665 1486 1504 1479Flt Permitted 0.27 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.71 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 482 3330 1321 334 3275 1566 1280 1486 1118 1479Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 17 1242 4 29 970 29 17 11 67 109 7 34RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 9 0 55 0 0 28 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 17 1242 3 29 970 20 17 23 0 109 13 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 6% 25% 0% 9% 2% 0% 10% 3% 8% 0% 3%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0Effective Green, g (s) 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 325 2248 892 225 2211 1057 224 260 196 259v/s Ratio Prot c0.37 0.30 0.02 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.00 0.09 0.01 0.01 c0.10v/c Ratio 0.05 0.55 0.00 0.13 0.44 0.02 0.08 0.09 0.56 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 4.4 6.7 4.2 4.6 6.0 4.3 27.6 27.6 30.2 27.5Progression Factor 0.58 1.00 0.56 0.64 0.71 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.9 0.0 1.1 0.6 0.0 0.7 0.7 10.9 0.4Delay (s) 2.8 7.6 2.4 4.1 4.9 4.0 28.3 28.3 41.1 27.8Level of Service A A A A A A C C D CApproach Delay (s) 7.5 4.8 28.3 37.5Approach LOS A A C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.0 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 43: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200933: Finch Avenue & Pearldale Avenue

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 33

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 51 1055 48 13 894 21 101 19 32 39 11 51Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.1 3.6 3.5 2.8 2.9 3.7 3.2 3.3 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.88Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1550 3336 1601 1578 3312 1521 1645 1559 1568 1404Flt Permitted 0.27 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.72 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 446 3336 1601 362 3312 1521 1235 1559 1189 1404Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 55 1147 52 14 972 23 110 21 35 42 12 55RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 16 0 0 7 0 30 0 0 47 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 55 1147 36 14 972 16 110 26 0 42 20 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 10% 7% 2% 8% 9% 5% 0% 0% 3% 10% 9% 16%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Effective Green, g (s) 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 307 2294 1101 249 2277 1046 185 234 178 211v/s Ratio Prot c0.34 0.29 0.02 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.02 0.04 0.01 c0.09 0.04v/c Ratio 0.18 0.50 0.03 0.06 0.43 0.02 0.59 0.11 0.24 0.10Uniform Delay, d1 4.5 6.0 4.0 4.1 5.5 3.9 31.7 29.4 30.0 29.3Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 1.10 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 0.8 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.0 13.3 1.0 3.1 0.9Delay (s) 5.7 6.7 4.1 2.3 6.6 2.8 45.0 30.4 33.1 30.2Level of Service A A A A A A D C C CApproach Delay (s) 6.6 6.5 40.1 31.3Approach LOS A A D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.8 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200934: Finch Avenue & Islington Avenue

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 34

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 253 807 37 317 938 114 38 510 224 112 1352 76Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.7 3.8 3.6 3.2 3.7 3.4 3.0 4.2 4.1 3.2 3.7 3.6Total Lost time (s) 2.5 7.0 7.0 2.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1562 3481 1568 1627 3411 1462 1636 3667 1624 1627 3510 1509Flt Permitted 0.18 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 294 3481 1568 407 3411 1462 230 3667 1624 596 3510 1509Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 275 877 40 345 1020 124 41 554 243 122 1470 83RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 15 0 0 58 0 0 169 0 0 27Lane Group Flow (vph) 275 877 25 345 1020 66 41 554 74 122 1470 56Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 6% 3% 6% 7% 8% 3% 5% 5% 6% 4% 7%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 53.5 45.0 45.0 53.5 45.0 45.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 53.5 45.0 45.0 53.5 45.0 45.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.45 0.45 0.54 0.45 0.45 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30Clearance Time (s) 2.5 7.0 7.0 2.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 265 1566 706 321 1535 658 69 1100 487 179 1053 453v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 0.25 c0.09 0.30 0.15 c0.42v/s Ratio Perm 0.47 0.02 c0.48 0.05 0.18 0.05 0.20 0.04v/c Ratio 1.04 0.56 0.03 1.07 0.66 0.10 0.59 0.50 0.15 0.68 1.40 0.12Uniform Delay, d1 18.2 20.2 15.4 19.4 21.6 15.8 29.8 28.9 25.7 30.8 35.0 25.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 65.4 1.5 0.1 71.5 2.3 0.3 32.4 1.6 0.7 19.0 184.0 0.6Delay (s) 83.6 21.7 15.5 90.9 23.9 16.1 62.3 30.5 26.3 49.8 219.0 26.0Level of Service F C B F C B E C C D F CApproach Delay (s) 35.8 38.8 30.8 197.1Approach LOS D D C F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 87.9 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.13Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.5% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 44: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200935: Finch Avenue & Kipling Avenue

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 35

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 170 599 25 213 520 153 15 434 162 243 752 188Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.6 3.8 3.4 3.0 3.7 2.9 3.0 3.7 3.4 3.3 3.7 3.5Total Lost time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1486 3386 1361 1574 3380 1379 1491 3318 1436 1711 3411 1521Flt Permitted 0.32 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 0.47 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 500 3386 1361 527 3380 1379 415 3318 1436 841 3411 1521Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 185 651 27 232 565 166 16 472 176 264 817 204RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 19 0 0 118 0 0 100 0 0 116Lane Group Flow (vph) 185 651 8 232 565 48 16 472 76 264 817 88Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 9% 16% 7% 8% 8% 13% 10% 10% 2% 7% 5%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 37.0 28.0 28.0 33.0 26.0 26.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0Effective Green, g (s) 37.0 28.0 28.0 33.0 26.0 26.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.31 0.31 0.37 0.29 0.29 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43Clearance Time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 304 1053 423 275 976 398 180 1438 622 364 1478 659v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.19 c0.07 0.17 0.14 0.24v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 0.01 c0.24 0.03 0.04 0.05 c0.31 0.06v/c Ratio 0.61 0.62 0.02 0.84 0.58 0.12 0.09 0.33 0.12 0.73 0.55 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 18.3 26.4 21.5 23.5 27.3 23.6 15.0 16.8 15.3 21.1 19.0 15.3Progression Factor 2.10 1.58 2.54 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 8.4 2.6 0.1 25.8 2.5 0.6 1.0 0.6 0.4 11.9 1.5 0.4Delay (s) 46.6 44.4 54.7 49.4 29.8 24.2 16.0 17.5 15.7 33.0 20.5 15.8Level of Service D D D D C C B B B C C BApproach Delay (s) 45.2 33.6 16.9 22.3Approach LOS D C B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 29.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200936: Finch Avenue & Albion Mall

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 36

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 830 9 6 783 5 17Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3573 1789 3579 1789 1601Flt Permitted 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3573 535 3579 1789 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 902 10 7 851 5 18RTOR Reduction (vph) 1 0 0 0 0 14Lane Group Flow (vph) 911 0 7 851 5 4Turn Type Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2Permitted Phases 8 2Actuated Green, G (s) 63.0 63.0 63.0 19.0 19.0Effective Green, g (s) 63.0 63.0 63.0 19.0 19.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2501 375 2505 378 338v/s Ratio Prot c0.26 0.24 c0.00v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.00v/c Ratio 0.36 0.02 0.34 0.01 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 5.4 4.1 5.3 28.1 28.1Progression Factor 0.39 2.40 2.27 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1Delay (s) 2.5 10.0 12.4 28.1 28.1Level of Service A A B C CApproach Delay (s) 2.5 12.4 28.1Approach LOS A B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 7.6 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.28Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 45: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200937: Albion Road & Finch Avenue

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 37

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 7 526 207 32 524 229 272 630 16 128 453 17Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.4 3.5 3.3 2.6 3.7 4.2 3.0 3.5 3.1 2.7 3.7 3.4Total Lost time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1372 3368 1487 1514 3476 1625 1574 3368 1220 1490 3510 1490Flt Permitted 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 571 3368 1487 628 3476 1625 709 3368 1220 460 3510 1490Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 8 572 225 35 570 249 296 685 17 139 492 18RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 133 0 0 114 0 0 11 0 0 12Lane Group Flow (vph) 8 572 93 35 570 135 296 685 6 139 492 6Heavy Vehicles (%) 14% 6% 5% 6% 5% 6% 7% 6% 25% 9% 4% 6%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 35.0 31.0 31.0 35.0 31.0 31.0Effective Green, g (s) 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 35.0 31.0 31.0 35.0 31.0 31.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.39 0.34 0.34 0.39 0.34 0.34Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 235 1385 611 258 1429 668 314 1160 420 225 1209 513v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.16 c0.04 0.20 0.03 0.14v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.08 c0.32 0.00 0.21 0.00v/c Ratio 0.03 0.41 0.15 0.14 0.40 0.20 0.94 0.59 0.01 0.62 0.41 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 15.8 18.8 16.6 16.5 18.7 17.0 25.7 24.3 19.4 21.0 22.5 19.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.62 0.72 1.01 0.72 0.97Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.9 0.5 1.1 0.8 0.7 35.9 2.0 0.1 11.6 1.0 0.0Delay (s) 16.1 19.7 17.2 17.6 19.5 17.7 55.1 17.1 14.1 32.8 17.2 18.9Level of Service B B B B B B E B B C B BApproach Delay (s) 19.0 18.9 28.3 20.6Approach LOS B B C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.1 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.3% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200938: Finch Avenue & Martin Grove Road

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 38

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 67 614 100 105 496 7 76 254 122 15 538 89Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.6 3.7 3.7 2.8 3.1 3.7 2.8 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1383 3304 1495 3125 1455 3292 1304 1612 3435Flt Permitted 0.39 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.58 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 562 3304 390 3125 461 3292 1304 988 3435Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 73 667 109 114 539 8 83 276 133 16 585 97RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 83 0 15 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 73 762 0 114 546 0 83 276 50 16 667 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 16% 8% 9% 10% 9% 0% 13% 6% 17% 7% 4% 12%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 34.0 41.5 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0Effective Green, g (s) 41.5 34.0 41.5 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.38 0.46 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38Clearance Time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 328 1248 272 1181 174 1244 493 373 1298v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.23 c0.03 0.17 0.08 c0.19v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.16 0.18 0.04 0.02v/c Ratio 0.22 0.61 0.42 0.46 0.48 0.22 0.10 0.04 0.51Uniform Delay, d1 13.9 22.6 14.9 21.1 21.3 19.0 18.1 17.7 21.6Progression Factor 0.61 0.61 0.53 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 2.1 4.5 1.2 9.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 1.5Delay (s) 10.0 16.1 12.3 15.7 30.3 19.4 18.5 17.9 23.1Level of Service A B B B C B B B CApproach Delay (s) 15.5 15.1 21.0 23.0Approach LOS B B C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.4 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 46: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200939: Finch Avenue & Silverstone Drive

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 39

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 35 694 22 65 528 47 28 36 89 40 67 34Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.8 3.8 3.7 2.9 3.8 3.7 3.1 3.1 3.7 3.2 3.3 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.95Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1551 3370 1541 3329 1445 1468 1597 1615Flt Permitted 0.41 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.65 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 678 3370 567 3329 1043 1468 1101 1615Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 38 754 24 71 574 51 30 39 97 43 73 37RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 83 0 0 21 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 38 776 0 71 618 0 30 53 0 43 89 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 9% 9% 8% 9% 15% 18% 17% 6% 8% 9% 6%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0Effective Green, g (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 490 2434 410 2404 151 212 159 233v/s Ratio Prot c0.23 0.19 0.04 c0.06v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.13 0.03 0.04v/c Ratio 0.08 0.32 0.17 0.26 0.20 0.25 0.27 0.38Uniform Delay, d1 3.7 4.5 4.0 4.3 33.9 34.2 34.3 34.9Progression Factor 0.60 0.51 2.70 2.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.2 2.9 2.8 4.1 4.7Delay (s) 2.5 2.6 11.5 12.9 36.8 37.0 38.4 39.6Level of Service A A B B D D D DApproach Delay (s) 2.6 12.7 37.0 39.3Approach LOS A B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.33Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200940: Finch Avenue & Westmore Drive

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 40

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 113 706 32 59 645 42 19 33 34 60 43 48Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.6 4.0 2.4 3.2 3.8 3.7 2.7 2.7 3.7 3.2 4.6 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1558 3511 1675 3431 1624 1533 1675 1885Flt Permitted 0.29 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.71 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 481 3511 532 3431 1185 1533 1251 1885Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 123 767 35 64 701 46 21 36 37 65 47 52RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 28 0 0 39 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 123 799 0 64 742 0 21 45 0 65 60 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 7% 0% 3% 7% 0% 0% 0% 6% 3% 0% 6%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 55.0 45.0 51.0 43.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0Effective Green, g (s) 55.0 45.0 51.0 43.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.50 0.57 0.48 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26Clearance Time (s) 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 414 1756 403 1639 303 392 320 482v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 c0.23 0.01 0.22 0.03 0.03v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.08 0.02 c0.05v/c Ratio 0.30 0.45 0.16 0.45 0.07 0.12 0.20 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 8.0 14.6 9.0 15.7 25.4 25.7 26.3 25.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 2.41 1.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.4 0.6 1.4 0.5Delay (s) 9.8 15.4 22.5 30.1 25.8 26.3 27.7 26.3Level of Service A B C C C C C CApproach Delay (s) 14.7 29.5 26.2 26.9Approach LOS B C C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.34Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 47: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200941: Finch Avenue & Highway 27

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 41

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 93 469 59 214 597 28 152 616 200 97 952 94Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.9 3.7 3.7 3.1 4.0 3.7 3.1 3.6 3.9 3.1 3.8 3.4Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1541 3243 1564 3597 1509 3343 1560 1655 3481 1327Flt Permitted 0.13 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 216 3243 331 3597 270 3343 1560 561 3481 1327Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 101 510 64 233 649 30 165 670 217 105 1035 102RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 2 0 0 0 110 0 0 52Lane Group Flow (vph) 101 566 0 233 677 0 165 670 107 105 1035 50Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 9% 24% 9% 4% 7% 13% 8% 7% 3% 6% 19%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 41.0 30.0 41.0 30.0 73.0 64.0 64.0 73.0 64.0 64.0Effective Green, g (s) 41.0 30.0 41.0 30.0 73.0 64.0 64.0 73.0 64.0 64.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.23 0.32 0.23 0.56 0.49 0.49 0.56 0.49 0.49Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 180 748 209 830 237 1646 768 391 1714 653v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.17 c0.09 0.19 c0.05 0.20 0.02 0.30v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 c0.26 c0.34 0.07 0.13 0.04v/c Ratio 0.56 0.76 1.11 0.82 0.70 0.41 0.14 0.27 0.60 0.08Uniform Delay, d1 34.5 46.6 40.0 47.4 17.8 21.0 18.0 14.0 23.8 17.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.62 0.49 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 12.0 7.0 96.5 8.7 12.0 0.6 0.3 1.7 1.6 0.2Delay (s) 46.6 53.7 136.5 56.0 58.6 10.8 3.4 15.7 25.4 17.6Level of Service D D F E E B A B C BApproach Delay (s) 52.6 76.6 16.8 24.0Approach LOS D E B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 39.4 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.8% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT Novermber 200942: Humber College Blvd & Highway 27

Existing conditions AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 42

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 66 221 284 152 233 64 354 703 238 62 1106 226Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.88Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1732 3127 1752 3420 1825 3288 1523 1789 3411 1415Flt Permitted 0.54 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 990 3127 693 3420 220 3288 1523 286 3411 1415Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 72 240 309 165 253 70 385 764 259 67 1202 246RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 178 0 0 19 0 0 0 112 0 0 124Lane Group Flow (vph) 72 371 0 165 304 0 385 764 147 67 1202 122Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 39 39 29 47 15 15 47Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 0% 1% 3% 1% 3% 0% 11% 2% 2% 7% 1%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 55.0 51.0 55.0 51.0 53.0 35.0 35.0 53.0 35.0 35.0Effective Green, g (s) 55.0 51.0 55.0 51.0 53.0 35.0 35.0 53.0 35.0 35.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.39 0.42 0.39 0.41 0.27 0.27 0.41 0.27 0.27Clearance Time (s) 4.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 442 1227 326 1342 312 885 410 325 918 381v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.12 c0.02 0.09 c0.17 0.23 0.03 c0.35v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.20 0.33 0.10 0.06 0.09v/c Ratio 0.16 0.30 0.51 0.23 1.23 0.86 0.36 0.21 1.31 0.32Uniform Delay, d1 22.6 27.2 27.8 26.3 39.3 45.2 38.4 25.5 47.5 38.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.46 1.25 1.98Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.6 5.5 0.4 129.9 10.9 2.4 1.1 145.5 1.7Delay (s) 23.4 27.9 33.3 26.7 169.3 56.1 40.9 38.4 204.7 76.8Level of Service C C C C F E D D F EApproach Delay (s) 27.3 29.0 84.3 176.5Approach LOS C C F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 103.5 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.1% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 48: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20091: Finch Avenue & Yonge Street

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 182 796 226 85 564 138 185 1775 147 93 875 118Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.8 3.6 2.9 3.6 3.1 4.0 2.8 3.5 3.7 3.2 3.6 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1423 2770 1425 2634 1480 4304 1522 3007Flt Permitted 0.18 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.08 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 264 2770 158 2634 179 4304 128 3007Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 198 865 246 92 613 150 201 1929 160 101 951 128RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 22 0 0 18 0 0 8 0 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 198 1089 0 92 745 0 201 2081 0 101 1070 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 221 146 146 221 182 415 415 182Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 6% 4% 14% 6% 3% 0% 2% 9% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt pm+ptProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 46.0 38.0 46.0 38.0 58.0 50.0 58.0 50.0Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 38.0 46.0 38.0 58.0 50.0 58.0 50.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.32 0.38 0.32 0.48 0.42 0.48 0.42Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 178 877 145 834 173 1793 155 1253v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 c0.39 0.04 0.28 c0.08 c0.48 0.04 0.36v/s Ratio Perm 0.35 0.20 0.48 0.27v/c Ratio 1.11 1.24 0.63 0.89 1.16 1.16 0.65 0.85Uniform Delay, d1 33.3 41.0 29.5 39.1 24.5 35.0 26.6 31.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 100.8 118.5 19.3 14.0 118.7 78.9 19.3 7.5Delay (s) 134.1 159.5 48.8 53.1 143.2 113.9 45.9 39.2Level of Service F F D D F F D DApproach Delay (s) 155.7 52.6 116.5 39.8Approach LOS F D F D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 99.8 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.19Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.8% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20092: Finch Avenue & Greenview

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 20 1199 44 34 894 26 60 2 31 13 6 16Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.89Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1797 3555 1772 3522 1763 2949 1654 3201Flt Permitted 0.25 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.73 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 473 3555 288 3522 1375 2949 1275 3201Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 22 1303 48 37 972 28 65 2 34 14 7 17RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 28 0 0 13 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 22 1349 0 37 998 0 65 8 0 14 11 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 45 25 25 45 8 12 12 8Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 3% 3% 0% 2% 0% 3% 8% 0% 0%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 69.0 69.0 69.0 69.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0Effective Green, g (s) 69.0 69.0 69.0 69.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 326 2453 199 2430 316 678 293 736v/s Ratio Prot c0.38 0.28 0.00 0.00v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.13 c0.05 0.01v/c Ratio 0.07 0.55 0.19 0.41 0.21 0.01 0.05 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 5.0 7.7 5.5 6.7 31.1 29.7 30.0 29.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.9 2.1 0.5 1.5 0.0 0.3 0.0Delay (s) 5.4 8.6 7.6 7.2 32.6 29.8 30.3 29.8Level of Service A A A A C C C CApproach Delay (s) 8.6 7.2 31.6 30.0Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.3 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 49: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20093: Finch Avenue & Talbot Road

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 3

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 283 951 5 0 930 233 12 1 9 106 2 130Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.9 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.3 2.9 3.7 4.8 3.7 3.5 2.7 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.94 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1632 3398 3280 1283 1785 1457Flt Permitted 0.19 1.00 1.00 0.79 0.74 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 332 3398 3280 1045 1393 1457Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 308 1034 5 0 1011 253 13 1 10 115 2 141RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 9 0 0 122 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 308 1039 0 0 1239 0 0 15 0 115 21 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 5% 0% 0% 4% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 66.0 66.0 66.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Effective Green, g (s) 66.0 66.0 66.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.13 0.13 0.13Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 243 2492 2405 139 186 194v/s Ratio Prot 0.31 0.38 0.01v/s Ratio Perm c0.93 0.01 c0.08v/c Ratio 1.27 0.42 0.52 0.11 0.62 0.11Uniform Delay, d1 12.0 4.6 5.1 34.3 36.8 34.3Progression Factor 0.94 0.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 145.1 0.4 0.8 1.6 14.5 1.1Delay (s) 156.4 1.8 5.9 35.9 51.3 35.4Level of Service F A A D D DApproach Delay (s) 37.2 5.9 35.9 42.5Approach LOS D A D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 24.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.17Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.8% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20094: Finch Avenue & Edithvale

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 5 1277 19 65 1115 5 44 0 96 0 0 3Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.90 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3578 1601 3567 3161 3042Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.76 0.87 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3404 1601 2733 2798 3042Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 5 1388 21 71 1212 5 48 0 104 0 0 3RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 69 0 0 2 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1393 16 0 1288 0 0 83 0 0 1 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 17.0 17.0Effective Green, g (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 17.0 17.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.19 0.19Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2458 1156 1974 529 575v/s Ratio Prot 0.00v/s Ratio Perm 0.41 0.01 c0.47 c0.03v/c Ratio 0.57 0.01 0.65 0.16 0.00Uniform Delay, d1 5.9 3.5 6.6 30.5 29.6Progression Factor 0.52 0.48 1.31 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.0 1.5 0.6 0.0Delay (s) 3.9 1.7 10.1 31.1 29.6Level of Service A A B C CApproach Delay (s) 3.9 10.1 31.1 29.6Approach LOS A B C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 8.2 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.4% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 50: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20095: Finch Avenue & Senlac Road

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 5

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 1052 220 149 1069 0 409 0 167 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3380 1617 1825 3444 1772 1601Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.76 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3380 1617 423 3444 1412 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1143 239 162 1162 0 445 0 182 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 102 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1143 165 162 1162 0 445 80 0 0 0 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 8% 1% 0% 6% 0% 3% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 62.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 15.0 15.0Effective Green, g (s) 62.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 15.0 15.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.17 0.17Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2328 1114 291 2373 235 267v/s Ratio Prot 0.34 0.34 0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 c0.38 c0.32v/c Ratio 0.49 0.15 0.56 0.49 1.89 0.30Uniform Delay, d1 6.6 4.8 7.1 6.6 37.5 32.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.67 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.3 6.0 0.6 417.8 2.9Delay (s) 7.3 5.1 11.1 5.0 455.3 35.8Level of Service A A B A F DApproach Delay (s) 6.9 5.7 333.5 0.0Approach LOS A A F A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 67.9 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20096: Finch Avenue & Grantbrook

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 6

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 133 1204 1076 376 46 64Sign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 145 1309 1170 409 50 70PedestriansLane Width (m)Walking Speed (m/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type TWLTL TWLTLMedian storage veh) 2 2Upstream signal (m) 106pX, platoon unblocked 0.84 0.84 0.84vC, conflicting volume 1578 2317 789vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1374vC2, stage 2 conf vol 943vCu, unblocked vol 1307 2187 368tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 67 69 87cM capacity (veh/h) 441 161 529

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 145 654 654 780 799 50 70Volume Left 145 0 0 0 0 50 0Volume Right 0 0 0 0 409 0 70cSH 441 1700 1700 1700 1700 161 529Volume to Capacity 0.33 0.38 0.38 0.46 0.47 0.31 0.13Queue Length 95th (m) 10.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 3.4Control Delay (s) 17.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.1 12.8Lane LOS C E BApproach Delay (s) 1.7 0.0 23.0Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.7Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 51: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20097: Finch & Finchurst

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 7

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 1205 10 10 1000 10 10Sign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 1310 11 11 1087 11 11PedestriansLane Width (m)Walking Speed (m/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type TWLTL TWLTLMedian storage veh) 2 2Upstream signal (m) 344pX, platoon unblocked 0.67 0.67 0.67vC, conflicting volume 1321 1880 660vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1315vC2, stage 2 conf vol 565vCu, unblocked vol 488 1325 0tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 98 97 99cM capacity (veh/h) 716 320 725

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 NB 2Volume Total 873 447 11 543 543 11 11Volume Left 0 0 11 0 0 11 0Volume Right 0 11 0 0 0 0 11cSH 1700 1700 716 1700 1700 320 725Volume to Capacity 0.51 0.26 0.02 0.32 0.32 0.03 0.01Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.3Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 16.6 10.0Lane LOS B C BApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 13.3Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20098: Finch Avenue & Bathurst Street

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 346 1211 105 165 895 115 129 1311 111 77 988 347Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.5 3.5 2.9 3.0 3.9 3.6 3.0 3.5 3.2 3.0 4.0 2.9Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1509 3368 1432 1652 3622 1553 1668 3433 1513 1636 3625 1460Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 179 3368 1432 148 3622 1553 149 3433 1513 147 3625 1460Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 376 1316 114 179 973 125 140 1425 121 84 1074 377RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 40 0 0 49 0 0 50 0 0 142Lane Group Flow (vph) 376 1316 74 179 973 76 140 1425 71 84 1074 235Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 6% 4% 2% 3% 4% 1% 4% 2% 3% 4% 2%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 58.0 47.0 47.0 58.0 47.0 47.0 56.0 47.0 47.0 56.0 47.0 47.0Effective Green, g (s) 58.0 47.0 47.0 58.0 47.0 47.0 56.0 47.0 47.0 56.0 47.0 47.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.36 0.36 0.45 0.36 0.36 0.43 0.36 0.36 0.43 0.36 0.36Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 192 1218 518 193 1309 561 169 1241 547 166 1311 528v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.39 0.08 0.27 c0.06 c0.42 0.03 0.30v/s Ratio Perm c0.71 0.05 0.33 0.05 0.30 0.05 0.18 0.16v/c Ratio 1.96 1.08 0.14 0.93 0.74 0.14 0.83 1.15 0.13 0.51 0.82 0.44Uniform Delay, d1 30.3 41.5 27.9 35.4 36.2 27.9 29.0 41.5 27.8 29.7 37.6 31.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 449.6 50.4 0.6 48.2 3.9 0.5 35.3 76.5 0.5 10.6 5.8 2.7Delay (s) 479.9 91.9 28.5 83.5 40.1 28.4 64.3 118.0 28.3 40.3 43.5 34.3Level of Service F F C F D C E F C D D CApproach Delay (s) 168.7 45.0 107.1 41.0Approach LOS F D F D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 96.1 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.53Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.7% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 52: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20099: Finch Avenue & Virgilwood Drive

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 60 1575 77 23 1458 27 58 3 94 25 0 31Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.1 3.9 3.4 3.1 3.7 3.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 3.7 4.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1624 3587 1579 1705 3503 1874 1948Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.88 0.65Satd. Flow (perm) 196 3587 1579 158 3503 1684 1285Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 65 1712 84 25 1585 29 63 3 102 27 0 34RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 18 0 1 0 0 50 0 0 31 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 65 1712 66 25 1613 0 0 118 0 0 30 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 4% 0% 0% 4% 0% 3% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 83.0 77.0 77.0 87.0 79.0 11.0 11.0Effective Green, g (s) 83.0 77.0 77.0 87.0 79.0 11.0 11.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.75 0.70 0.70 0.79 0.72 0.10 0.10Clearance Time (s) 2.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 226 2511 1105 237 2516 168 129v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 c0.48 c0.01 0.46v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.04 0.08 c0.07 0.02v/c Ratio 0.29 0.68 0.06 0.11 0.64 0.70 0.24Uniform Delay, d1 5.8 9.5 5.2 6.7 8.1 47.9 45.6Progression Factor 0.36 0.24 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 1.1 0.1 0.9 1.3 21.6 4.2Delay (s) 4.5 3.4 0.4 7.6 9.4 69.5 49.9Level of Service A A A A A E DApproach Delay (s) 3.3 9.3 69.5 49.9Approach LOS A A E D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.7 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.9% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200910: Finch Avenue & Torresdale Avenue

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 10

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 174 1487 110 80 1157 64 38 4 39 64 3 31Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.8 3.7 3.0 3.6 2.8 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.86Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1636 3451 1478 3312 1388 1624 1524 1722 1549Flt Permitted 0.19 1.00 0.08 1.00 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.73 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 328 3451 128 3312 1388 1253 1524 1318 1549Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 189 1616 120 87 1258 70 41 4 42 70 3 34RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 0 20 0 37 0 0 30 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 189 1731 0 87 1258 50 41 9 0 70 7 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 5% 17% 14% 9% 6% 5% 0% 7% 6% 0% 5%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 82.0 76.0 86.0 78.0 78.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Effective Green, g (s) 82.0 76.0 86.0 78.0 78.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.75 0.69 0.78 0.71 0.71 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11Clearance Time (s) 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 316 2384 198 2349 984 137 166 144 169v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 c0.50 c0.03 0.38 0.01 0.00v/s Ratio Perm 0.41 0.31 0.04 0.03 c0.05v/c Ratio 0.60 0.73 0.44 0.54 0.05 0.30 0.05 0.49 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 5.0 10.5 10.2 7.5 4.8 45.1 43.9 46.1 43.8Progression Factor 2.96 0.59 2.53 0.83 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.9 1.2 5.3 0.7 0.1 5.5 0.6 11.3 0.4Delay (s) 19.8 7.4 31.1 6.9 4.4 50.6 44.5 57.4 44.3Level of Service B A C A A D D E DApproach Delay (s) 8.7 8.3 47.4 52.8Approach LOS A A D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 10.8 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.6% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 53: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200911: Finch Avenue & Wilmington Avenue

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 11

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1319 149 183 1000 208 421Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 4.0 2.8 2.8 4.2 2.7 2.8Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 2.0 4.5 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3557 1415 1628 3703 1577 1429Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3557 1415 201 3703 1577 1429Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1434 162 199 1087 226 458RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 62 0 0 0 222Lane Group Flow (vph) 1434 100 199 1087 226 236Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 4% 1% 4% 3% 3%Turn Type Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 4 3 8 2Permitted Phases 4 8 2Actuated Green, G (s) 68.0 68.0 87.5 87.5 11.0 11.0Effective Green, g (s) 68.0 68.0 87.5 87.5 11.0 11.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.80 0.80 0.10 0.10Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 2.0 4.5 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2199 875 367 2946 158 143v/s Ratio Prot c0.40 c0.08 0.29 0.14v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.35 c0.16v/c Ratio 0.65 0.11 0.54 0.37 1.43 1.65Uniform Delay, d1 13.4 8.6 11.1 3.3 49.5 49.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.76 0.21 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.3 4.9 0.3 226.1 320.8Delay (s) 15.0 8.9 24.3 1.0 275.6 370.3Level of Service B A C A F FApproach Delay (s) 14.3 4.6 339.0Approach LOS B A F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 73.1 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200912: Finch Avenue & Dufferin Street

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 12

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 73 718 347 198 620 173 219 1168 352 263 1166 42Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.9 3.5 3.6 2.5 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.4 3.9 2.9 3.9 3.4Total Lost time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1435 3400 1429 1523 3466 1478 1601 4721 1601 5068Flt Permitted 0.23 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.07 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 342 3400 1429 255 3466 1478 208 4721 120 5068Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 79 780 377 215 674 188 238 1270 383 286 1267 46RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 141 0 0 134 0 42 0 0 3 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 79 780 236 215 674 54 238 1611 0 286 1310 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 16% 5% 13% 4% 3% 2% 4% 3% 6% 4% 5% 11%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+ptProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 45.0 37.0 37.0 45.0 37.0 37.0 68.0 56.0 68.0 56.0Effective Green, g (s) 45.0 37.0 37.0 45.0 37.0 37.0 68.0 56.0 68.0 56.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.28 0.28 0.35 0.28 0.28 0.52 0.43 0.52 0.43Clearance Time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 186 968 407 166 986 421 237 2034 199 2183v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.23 c0.08 0.19 0.09 c0.34 c0.13 0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.17 0.37 0.04 0.43 0.62v/c Ratio 0.42 0.81 0.58 1.30 0.68 0.13 1.00 0.79 1.44 0.60Uniform Delay, d1 30.5 43.2 39.8 38.2 41.3 34.5 26.6 32.0 38.1 28.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 7.0 7.1 5.9 170.0 3.8 0.6 59.5 3.3 223.0 1.2Delay (s) 37.5 50.3 45.8 208.2 45.1 35.1 86.2 35.2 261.0 29.6Level of Service D D D F D D F D F CApproach Delay (s) 48.1 76.0 41.6 71.0Approach LOS D E D E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 57.5 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.3% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 54: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200913: Finch Avenue & Alness Street

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 345 1406 76 74 1063 185 71 158 66 262 187 112Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.5 3.6 2.8 3.5 3.3 4.2 4.2 3.7 4.4 4.4 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.94Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1636 3368 1615 1551 3368 1531 1750 1775 1854 1835Flt Permitted 0.21 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.39 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 363 3368 1615 201 3368 1531 372 1775 764 1835Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 375 1528 83 80 1155 201 77 172 72 285 203 122RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 22 0 0 60 0 14 0 0 20 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 375 1528 61 80 1155 141 77 230 0 285 305 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 6% 0% 6% 6% 2% 10% 10% 7% 6% 6% 7%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0Effective Green, g (s) 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 254 2358 1131 141 2358 1072 68 323 139 334v/s Ratio Prot 0.45 0.34 0.13 0.17v/s Ratio Perm c1.03 0.04 0.40 0.09 0.21 c0.37v/c Ratio 1.48 0.65 0.05 0.57 0.49 0.13 1.13 0.71 2.05 0.91Uniform Delay, d1 16.5 9.1 5.1 8.2 7.5 5.5 45.0 42.3 45.0 44.2Progression Factor 1.24 0.97 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 233.8 1.3 0.1 15.5 0.7 0.3 149.7 12.6 496.7 31.6Delay (s) 254.3 10.2 0.9 23.7 8.3 5.7 194.7 54.9 541.7 75.8Level of Service F B A C A A F D F EApproach Delay (s) 55.9 8.8 88.4 293.5Approach LOS E A F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 76.0 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.59Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.0% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200914: Finch Avenue & Chesswood Drive

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 14

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 8 1170 182 152 1305 11 337 3 97 8 2 11Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.3 3.4 3.7 3.0 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.7Total Lost time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 928 3277 1560 3340 1043 831 1685 1545Flt Permitted 0.14 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.69 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 135 3277 214 3340 822 831 1219 1545Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 9 1272 198 165 1418 12 366 3 105 9 2 12RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 70 0 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 1459 0 165 1429 0 366 38 0 9 5 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 88% 5% 9% 8% 8% 0% 73% 9% 100% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0Effective Green, g (s) 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 91 2205 144 2247 172 174 255 323v/s Ratio Prot 0.45 0.43 0.05 0.00v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.77 c0.45 0.01v/c Ratio 0.10 0.66 1.15 0.64 2.13 0.22 0.04 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 6.3 10.6 18.0 10.3 43.5 36.1 34.7 34.5Progression Factor 1.82 1.96 1.56 1.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 1.3 113.8 1.2 526.6 2.9 0.3 0.1Delay (s) 13.2 22.0 142.0 14.5 570.1 39.0 34.9 34.6Level of Service B C F B F D C CApproach Delay (s) 22.0 27.7 449.1 34.7Approach LOS C C F C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 81.3 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.38Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 55: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200915: Finch Avenue & Driveway

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 5 1546 7 6 1553 0 3 0 9 5 0 5Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.93Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3576 1789 3579 1669 1713Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.97 0.92Satd. Flow (perm) 205 3576 205 3579 1631 1621Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 5 1680 8 7 1688 0 3 0 10 5 0 5RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 1688 0 7 1688 0 0 5 0 0 6 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 17.0 17.0Effective Green, g (s) 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 17.0 17.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 158 2763 158 2766 252 251v/s Ratio Prot c0.47 0.47v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.03 0.00 c0.00v/c Ratio 0.03 0.61 0.04 0.61 0.02 0.02Uniform Delay, d1 2.9 5.4 2.9 5.4 39.4 39.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.79 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.2Delay (s) 3.3 6.4 3.0 10.0 39.6 39.6Level of Service A A A A D DApproach Delay (s) 6.4 10.0 39.6 39.6Approach LOS A A D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 8.4 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200916: Finch Avenue & Alexdon

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 16

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 5 1520 31 119 1641 1 26 0 182 1 0 2Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.91Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3568 1789 3578 1789 1601 1686Flt Permitted 0.05 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (perm) 103 3568 123 3578 1424 1601 1686Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 5 1652 34 129 1784 1 28 0 198 1 0 2RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 0 2 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 1685 0 129 1785 0 28 0 61 0 1 0Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt custom custom PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 84.0 73.0 84.0 73.0 22.0 22.0 22.0Effective Green, g (s) 84.0 73.0 84.0 73.0 22.0 22.0 22.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.62 0.71 0.62 0.19 0.19 0.19Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 230 2207 243 2214 265 298 314v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.47 c0.05 c0.50v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.33 0.02 c0.04 0.00v/c Ratio 0.02 0.76 0.53 0.81 0.11 0.21 0.00Uniform Delay, d1 13.7 16.3 19.1 17.1 39.8 40.6 39.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 2.6 8.1 3.3 0.8 1.6 0.0Delay (s) 13.9 18.8 27.2 20.4 40.6 42.2 39.1Level of Service B B C C D D DApproach Delay (s) 18.8 20.8 42.0 39.1Approach LOS B C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 21.2 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65Actuated Cycle Length (s) 118.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 56: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200917: Finch Avenue & Tangiers Road

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 36 1105 50 45 1322 53 119 37 55 148 41 37Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.9 3.7 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.7 2.8 3.6 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.93Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 3454 1549 1611 3312 1601 1453 1542 1547 3115Flt Permitted 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.69 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 288 3454 1549 368 3312 1601 1069 1542 1128 3115Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 39 1201 54 49 1437 58 129 40 60 161 45 40RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 11 0 0 12 0 50 0 0 36 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 39 1201 43 49 1437 46 129 51 0 161 49 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 28 12 12 28Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 8% 2% 8% 9% 2% 10% 0% 4% 4% 0% 9%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 87.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Effective Green, g (s) 87.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 228 2732 1225 291 2619 1266 107 154 113 312v/s Ratio Prot 0.35 c0.43 0.03 0.02v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.12 c0.14v/c Ratio 0.17 0.44 0.03 0.17 0.55 0.04 1.21 0.33 1.42 0.16Uniform Delay, d1 2.8 3.7 2.5 2.8 4.2 2.5 49.5 46.1 49.5 45.3Progression Factor 2.59 2.82 5.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.1 0.0 1.2 0.8 0.1 152.4 5.6 234.7 1.1Delay (s) 7.6 10.5 12.4 4.0 5.1 2.5 201.9 51.7 284.2 46.3Level of Service A B B A A A F D F DApproach Delay (s) 10.5 5.0 136.3 202.0Approach LOS B A F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 30.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200918: Finch Avenue & Keele Street

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 18

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 114 1114 216 171 862 226 207 847 183 249 962 54Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.1 3.7 3.7 3.0 3.3 2.6 3.0 3.6 3.2 3.0 3.2 2.6Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 0.58Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1550 3411 923 1478 3172 886 1532 3343 1144 1518 3165 755Flt Permitted 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 207 3411 923 160 3172 886 170 3343 1144 202 3165 755Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 124 1211 235 186 937 246 225 921 199 271 1046 59RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 104 0 0 153 0 0 99 0 0 37Lane Group Flow (vph) 124 1211 131 186 937 93 225 921 100 271 1046 22Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 199 212 212 199 418 111 111 418Heavy Vehicles (%) 10% 7% 18% 14% 10% 9% 10% 8% 3% 11% 9% 11%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 46.0 39.0 39.0 46.0 39.0 39.0 48.0 38.0 38.0 48.0 38.0 38.0Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 39.0 39.0 46.0 39.0 39.0 48.0 38.0 38.0 48.0 38.0 38.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.35 0.35 0.42 0.35 0.35 0.44 0.35 0.35 0.44 0.35 0.35Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 172 1209 327 151 1125 314 198 1155 395 208 1093 261v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.35 c0.08 0.30 0.10 0.28 c0.12 0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.26 0.14 c0.44 0.11 0.39 0.09 c0.45 0.03v/c Ratio 0.72 1.00 0.40 1.23 0.83 0.30 1.14 0.80 0.25 1.30 0.96 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 23.4 35.5 26.7 27.8 32.5 25.6 28.6 32.5 25.8 25.0 35.2 24.3Progression Factor 1.07 0.69 0.37 0.89 0.98 1.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 20.6 24.8 3.2 141.9 6.0 1.9 105.4 5.8 1.5 166.7 18.7 0.6Delay (s) 45.5 49.4 13.1 166.5 37.7 41.2 134.1 38.3 27.4 191.7 53.9 24.9Level of Service D D B F D D F D C F D CApproach Delay (s) 43.6 55.8 52.7 79.8Approach LOS D E D E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 57.5 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.27Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.7% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 57: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200919: Finch Avenue & Romfield Lane

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1 1190 14 15 1554 0 1 0 2 6 0 16Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.5 3.5 2.9 3.7 3.7 2.6 3.7 4.8 3.7 3.7 4.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.90Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 3275 1489 3350 1657 1867Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.93 0.95 0.94Satd. Flow (perm) 3125 1489 3126 1608 1787Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1 1293 15 16 1689 0 1 0 2 7 0 17RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 14 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1294 11 0 1705 0 0 1 0 0 10 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 9% 0% 0% 9% 43% 17% 0% 16% 0% 0% 4%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 6 2Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 77.0 77.0 77.0 21.0 21.0Effective Green, g (s) 77.0 77.0 77.0 21.0 21.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.19 0.19Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2188 1042 2188 307 341v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm 0.41 0.01 c0.55 0.00 c0.01v/c Ratio 0.59 0.01 0.78 0.00 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 8.4 5.0 10.9 36.0 36.2Progression Factor 1.28 1.63 1.31 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.2Delay (s) 11.8 8.1 16.5 36.1 36.4Level of Service B A B D DApproach Delay (s) 11.7 16.5 36.1 36.4Approach LOS B B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.8% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200920: Finch Avenue & Sentinel Road

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 20

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 129 977 112 95 1063 99 153 317 58 138 226 96Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.8 3.4 3.2 2.9 3.4 2.9 3.6 4.0 2.4 3.5 4.0 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1612 3268 1442 1632 3152 1432 1770 3587 1513 3450Flt Permitted 0.21 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.37 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 362 3268 1442 413 3152 1432 830 3587 587 3450Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 140 1062 122 103 1155 108 166 345 63 150 246 104RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 35 0 0 22 0 13 0 0 42 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 140 1062 87 103 1155 86 166 395 0 150 308 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 8% 7% 2% 12% 4% 2% 3% 1% 18% 5% 3%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0Effective Green, g (s) 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 257 2317 1023 293 2235 1015 143 620 101 596v/s Ratio Prot 0.32 0.37 0.11 0.09v/s Ratio Perm c0.39 0.06 0.25 0.06 0.20 c0.26v/c Ratio 0.54 0.46 0.08 0.35 0.52 0.08 1.16 0.64 1.49 0.52Uniform Delay, d1 7.6 6.9 5.0 6.2 7.3 5.0 45.5 42.3 45.5 41.3Progression Factor 1.31 1.40 3.91 0.11 0.14 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 7.5 0.6 0.2 2.0 0.5 0.1 125.0 4.9 263.5 3.2Delay (s) 17.4 10.2 19.5 2.7 1.5 0.7 170.5 47.2 309.0 44.5Level of Service B B B A A A F D F DApproach Delay (s) 11.9 1.6 82.9 123.9Approach LOS B A F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 33.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.5% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 58: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200921: Finch Avenue & Tobermory Drive

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 21

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 44 1054 0 0 1532 58 0 0 0 50 0 33Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.5 3.0 3.7 3.7 3.1 3.5 3.7 4.8 3.7 4.8 4.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1584 3240 3265 1978Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.82Satd. Flow (perm) 189 3240 3265 1662Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 48 1146 0 0 1665 63 0 0 0 54 0 36RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 22 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 1146 0 0 1726 0 0 0 0 0 68 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 4% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 89.0 89.0 89.0 9.0Effective Green, g (s) 89.0 89.0 89.0 9.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.08Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 153 2621 2642 136v/s Ratio Prot 0.35 c0.53v/s Ratio Perm 0.25 c0.04v/c Ratio 0.31 0.44 0.65 0.50Uniform Delay, d1 2.7 3.1 4.3 48.3Progression Factor 1.09 0.57 0.38 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.2 0.4 1.1 12.5Delay (s) 7.2 2.2 2.7 60.9Level of Service A A A EApproach Delay (s) 2.4 2.7 0.0 60.9Approach LOS A A A E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 4.3 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.0% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200922: Finch Avenue & Driftwood Avenue

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 22

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 62 1117 103 123 1274 43 105 93 79 35 94 57Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.4 3.5 3.8 2.4 3.4 3.1 2.9 3.7 3.7 3.2 2.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.94Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1337 3305 1461 1534 3461 1495 1585 1500 1612 1380Flt Permitted 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.58 1.00 0.53 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 184 3305 1461 258 3461 1495 961 1500 893 1380Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 67 1214 112 134 1385 47 114 101 86 38 102 62RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 38 0 0 15 0 28 0 0 20 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 67 1214 74 134 1385 32 114 159 0 38 144 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 17% 8% 13% 2% 2% 2% 5% 28% 9% 7% 24% 9%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 71.0 65.0 65.0 75.0 67.0 67.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0Effective Green, g (s) 71.0 65.0 65.0 75.0 67.0 67.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.59 0.59 0.68 0.61 0.61 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 2.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 182 1953 863 269 2108 911 201 314 187 289v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.37 c0.04 c0.40 0.11 0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.05 0.30 0.02 c0.12 0.04v/c Ratio 0.37 0.62 0.09 0.50 0.66 0.04 0.57 0.51 0.20 0.50Uniform Delay, d1 10.0 14.5 9.7 9.2 14.0 8.6 39.0 38.5 35.9 38.4Progression Factor 2.89 1.81 3.92 1.59 0.99 1.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.1 0.0 4.9 1.2 0.1 11.1 5.8 2.4 6.0Delay (s) 29.5 26.4 38.0 19.5 15.1 9.9 50.1 44.2 38.4 44.5Level of Service C C D B B A D D D DApproach Delay (s) 27.5 15.4 46.5 43.3Approach LOS C B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 24.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 59: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200923: Finch Avenue & Jane Street

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 23

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 182 1269 273 126 1166 116 249 738 108 148 929 139Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.9 3.8 4.6 3.0 3.7 3.3 3.0 3.7 3.7 2.5 3.6 4.4Total Lost time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.66 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.63 1.00 1.00 0.65Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1570 3417 1116 1546 4735 1574 3380 984 1476 3343 1073Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 170 3417 1116 176 4735 174 3380 984 345 3343 1073Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 198 1379 297 137 1267 126 271 802 117 161 1010 151RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 129 0 11 0 0 0 59 0 0 81Lane Group Flow (vph) 198 1379 168 137 1382 0 271 802 58 161 1010 70Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 144 231 231 144 263 297 297 263Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 8% 6% 9% 6% 9% 7% 8% 5% 6% 8% 6%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 48.0 39.0 39.0 44.0 37.0 48.0 38.0 38.0 44.0 36.0 36.0Effective Green, g (s) 48.0 39.0 39.0 44.0 37.0 48.0 38.0 38.0 44.0 36.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.34 0.44 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.33 0.33Clearance Time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 189 1211 396 158 1593 203 1168 340 220 1094 351v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 c0.40 0.06 0.29 c0.12 0.24 0.05 c0.30v/s Ratio Perm 0.37 0.15 0.29 0.46 0.06 0.24 0.06v/c Ratio 1.05 1.14 0.42 0.87 0.87 1.33 0.69 0.17 0.73 0.92 0.20Uniform Delay, d1 27.0 35.5 27.0 27.1 34.2 28.3 30.9 25.0 23.4 35.7 26.6Progression Factor 1.85 1.57 2.86 1.68 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 73.8 71.6 2.9 35.4 5.2 180.3 3.3 1.1 19.3 14.1 1.3Delay (s) 123.6 127.5 79.9 81.1 32.9 208.6 34.2 26.1 42.7 49.7 27.9Level of Service F F E F C F C C D D CApproach Delay (s) 119.5 37.2 73.1 46.4Approach LOS F D E D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 72.6 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.9% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200924: Finch Avenue & Yorkgate Boulevard

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 24

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 446 1561 12 4 1623 28 74 0 8 65 0 354Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.3 3.7 2.9 3.1 3.7 2.8 3.7 3.1 2.6 3.7 2.9Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1604 4683 1665 4611 1581 1525 1263 1460Flt Permitted 0.08 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 141 4683 227 4611 1581 1525 1263 1460Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 485 1697 13 4 1764 30 80 0 9 71 0 385RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 8 0 0 322Lane Group Flow (vph) 485 1709 0 4 1792 0 80 0 1 71 0 63Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 7% 0% 0% 6% 4% 4% 0% 0% 27% 0% 2%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt custom custom custom customProtected Phases 7 4 3 8Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 79.0 71.0 48.0 44.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0Effective Green, g (s) 79.0 71.0 48.0 44.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.65 0.44 0.40 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 514 3023 151 1844 259 250 207 239v/s Ratio Prot c0.27 0.36 0.00 0.39v/s Ratio Perm c0.41 0.01 0.05 0.00 c0.06 0.04v/c Ratio 0.94 0.57 0.03 0.97 0.31 0.01 0.34 0.26Uniform Delay, d1 32.0 10.9 17.5 32.4 40.5 38.5 40.8 40.2Progression Factor 1.82 0.30 0.49 0.51 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.5 0.1 0.2 9.9 3.1 0.0 4.5 2.7Delay (s) 62.6 3.3 8.7 26.4 43.6 38.6 45.2 42.9Level of Service E A A C D D D DApproach Delay (s) 16.4 26.3 43.1 43.2Approach LOS B C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 23.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 60: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200925: Finch Avenue & Norfinch Drive

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 25

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 90 1623 279 230 1827 104 503 108 226 161 187 228Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.7 3.7 3.0 2.5 3.5 3.7 3.2 4.6 3.5 2.8 3.1 3.1Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1477 4782 1553 4807 1554 1852 1507 1468 1646 1261Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 0.68 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 159 4782 152 4807 602 1852 1507 1054 1646 1261Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 98 1764 303 250 1986 113 547 117 246 175 203 248RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 22 0 0 6 0 0 0 152 0 0 79Lane Group Flow (vph) 98 2045 0 250 2093 0 547 117 94 175 203 169Heavy Vehicles (%) 10% 8% 3% 2% 6% 3% 11% 14% 6% 12% 9% 21%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 43.0 39.0 53.0 45.0 45.0 29.0 29.0 31.0 19.0 19.0Effective Green, g (s) 43.0 39.0 53.0 45.0 45.0 29.0 29.0 31.0 19.0 19.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.35 0.48 0.41 0.41 0.26 0.26 0.28 0.17 0.17Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 110 1695 201 1967 437 488 397 342 284 218v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.43 c0.11 0.44 c0.25 0.06 0.06 0.12v/s Ratio Perm 0.31 c0.49 c0.26 0.06 0.09 0.13v/c Ratio 0.89 1.21 1.24 1.06 1.25 0.24 0.24 0.51 0.71 0.78Uniform Delay, d1 31.4 35.5 31.1 32.5 28.9 31.8 31.8 32.2 42.9 43.5Progression Factor 2.08 1.59 1.54 1.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 50.7 97.5 128.9 35.0 131.0 1.2 1.4 5.4 14.3 23.4Delay (s) 116.3 153.9 176.7 89.9 159.9 33.0 33.2 37.6 57.2 66.8Level of Service F F F F F C C D E EApproach Delay (s) 152.2 99.1 109.3 55.5Approach LOS F F F E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 115.1 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.17Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.7% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200926: Finch Avenue & Highway 26 NB off ramp

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 26

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 2197 0 0 1705 543 454Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 5142 5142 3471 1601Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 5142 5142 3471 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 2388 0 0 1853 590 493RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 2388 0 0 1853 590 493Turn Type FreeProtected Phases 4 8 2Permitted Phases FreeActuated Green, G (s) 69.7 69.7 28.3 110.0Effective Green, g (s) 69.7 69.7 28.3 110.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.63 0.26 1.00Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3258 3258 893 1601v/s Ratio Prot c0.46 0.36 c0.17v/s Ratio Perm 0.31v/c Ratio 0.73 0.57 0.66 0.31Uniform Delay, d1 13.8 11.5 36.6 0.0Progression Factor 0.85 0.51 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.1 3.8 0.5Delay (s) 12.1 6.0 40.4 0.5Level of Service B A D AApproach Delay (s) 12.1 6.0 22.2Approach LOS B A C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.9% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 61: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200927: Finch Avenue & Highway 26 SB off ramp

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 27

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 2629 2103 0 807 635Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 5142 5142 3471 1601Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 5142 5142 3471 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2858 2286 0 877 690RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2858 2286 0 877 690Turn Type FreeProtected Phases 4 8 6Permitted Phases FreeActuated Green, G (s) 79.0 79.0 18.0 110.0Effective Green, g (s) 79.0 79.0 18.0 110.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.16 1.00Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3693 3693 568 1601v/s Ratio Prot c0.56 0.44 c0.25v/s Ratio Perm 0.43v/c Ratio 0.77 0.62 1.54 0.43Uniform Delay, d1 9.8 7.9 46.0 0.0Progression Factor 0.93 1.01 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.7 253.5 0.8Delay (s) 9.3 8.7 299.5 0.8Level of Service A A F AApproach Delay (s) 9.3 8.7 168.0Approach LOS A A F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 46.1 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 128.6% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200928: Finch Avenue & Signet Drive

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 28

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 31 1852 81 178 1804 288 118 252 578 745 232 39Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.7 3.5 3.7 2.7 3.2 3.7 3.4 3.1 3.7 3.0 2.6 3.8Total Lost time (s) 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1624 4771 1504 4568 1634 1617 1328 1381 1535 1364Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 175 4771 154 4568 1037 1617 1328 277 1535 1364Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 34 2013 88 193 1961 313 128 274 628 810 252 42RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 19 0 0 0 105 0 0 32Lane Group Flow (vph) 34 2096 0 193 2255 0 128 274 524 810 252 10Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 7% 3% 8% 6% 8% 8% 11% 23% 22% 10% 21%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 46.0 39.0 50.0 41.0 31.0 15.0 15.0 48.0 26.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 39.0 50.0 41.0 31.0 15.0 15.0 48.0 26.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.35 0.45 0.37 0.28 0.14 0.14 0.44 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 165 1692 180 1703 379 221 181 392 363 322v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.44 c0.09 c0.49 0.05 0.17 c0.51 0.16v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.40 0.05 c0.39 0.39 0.01v/c Ratio 0.21 1.24 1.07 1.32 0.34 1.24 2.89 2.07 0.69 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 24.7 35.5 29.2 34.5 30.8 47.5 47.5 31.1 38.4 32.3Progression Factor 0.93 1.05 1.11 1.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 111.0 81.3 149.2 2.4 140.3 866.5 488.6 10.5 0.2Delay (s) 24.7 148.5 113.8 189.5 33.2 187.8 914.0 519.6 48.8 32.5Level of Service C F F F C F F F D CApproach Delay (s) 146.5 183.6 611.3 393.6Approach LOS F F F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 271.7 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.71Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 129.6% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 62: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200929: Finch Avenue & Weston Road

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 29

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 83 1032 112 183 1318 182 161 452 106 285 788 189Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.1 3.4 3.7 3.2 3.4 3.7 2.6 3.4 3.7 3.3 3.7 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1470 3268 1555 1627 4643 1472 3330 1601 1454 3148Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.45 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 188 3268 1555 196 4643 270 3330 1601 689 3148Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 90 1122 122 199 1433 198 175 491 115 310 857 205RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 73 0 16 0 0 0 60 0 19 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 90 1122 49 199 1615 0 175 491 55 310 1043 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 16% 8% 5% 6% 7% 9% 9% 6% 2% 20% 12% 15%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 39.0 33.0 33.0 43.0 35.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0Effective Green, g (s) 39.0 33.0 33.0 43.0 35.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.39 0.32 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48Clearance Time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 137 980 467 181 1477 130 1604 771 332 1517v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.34 c0.08 c0.35 0.15 0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.03 0.35 c0.65 0.03 0.45v/c Ratio 0.66 1.14 0.11 1.10 1.09 1.35 0.31 0.07 0.93 0.69Uniform Delay, d1 28.3 38.5 27.8 28.8 37.5 28.5 17.3 15.3 26.8 22.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.32 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 22.0 77.4 0.5 53.1 43.2 198.1 0.5 0.2 35.1 2.6Delay (s) 50.3 115.9 28.3 120.1 73.3 226.6 17.8 15.5 61.9 24.6Level of Service D F C F E F B B E CApproach Delay (s) 103.5 78.4 64.3 33.1Approach LOS F E E C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 70.9 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.17Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.2% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200930: Finch Avenue & Jayzel Drive

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 30

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 22 1307 74 133 1547 7 85 4 85 4 0 5Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.8 3.8 3.7 3.0 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1275 3417 1512 1546 3341 1733 1481 1891Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.84Satd. Flow (perm) 136 3417 1512 250 3341 1371 1481 1615Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 24 1421 80 145 1682 8 92 4 92 4 0 5RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 24 1421 57 145 1690 0 92 29 0 0 5 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 29% 8% 8% 9% 8% 0% 3% 0% 9% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 10.0 10.0 10.0Effective Green, g (s) 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 10.0 10.0 10.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.12 0.12 0.12Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 97 2435 1077 178 2380 171 185 202v/s Ratio Prot 0.42 0.51 0.02v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.04 c0.58 c0.07 0.00v/c Ratio 0.25 0.58 0.05 0.81 0.71 0.54 0.15 0.02Uniform Delay, d1 4.0 5.7 3.4 7.9 6.7 32.8 31.2 30.7Progression Factor 0.20 0.21 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 5.1 0.9 0.1 32.1 1.8 11.6 1.8 0.2Delay (s) 5.9 2.1 0.1 40.0 8.5 44.4 33.0 30.9Level of Service A A A D A D C CApproach Delay (s) 2.0 11.0 38.6 30.9Approach LOS A B D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 8.7 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.4% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 63: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200931: Finch Avenue & Milvan Drive

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 31

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 88 1124 130 51 1360 183 112 63 2 155 191 107Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.7 2.4 2.8 3.6 3.3 3.0 3.2 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.1Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1574 3444 1308 1645 3343 1459 1636 1798 1405 1879 1201Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.71 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 188 3444 1308 306 3343 1459 968 1798 1052 1879 1201Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 96 1222 141 55 1478 199 122 68 2 168 208 116RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 55 0 0 77 0 2 0 0 0 32Lane Group Flow (vph) 96 1222 86 55 1478 122 122 68 0 168 208 84Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 6% 7% 0% 8% 7% 3% 0% 20% 27% 0% 27%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0Effective Green, g (s) 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 115 2109 801 187 2048 894 230 427 250 446 285v/s Ratio Prot 0.35 0.44 0.04 0.11v/s Ratio Perm c0.51 0.07 0.18 0.08 0.13 c0.16 0.07v/c Ratio 0.83 0.58 0.11 0.29 0.72 0.14 0.53 0.16 0.67 0.47 0.29Uniform Delay, d1 12.3 9.3 6.4 7.3 10.8 6.6 26.6 24.2 27.7 26.2 25.0Progression Factor 0.98 0.78 0.62 0.96 0.80 1.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 40.8 0.9 0.2 2.8 1.6 0.2 8.5 0.8 13.5 3.5 2.6Delay (s) 52.8 8.2 4.2 9.8 10.2 9.0 35.1 25.0 41.2 29.6 27.6Level of Service D A A A B A D C D C CApproach Delay (s) 10.8 10.1 31.4 33.1Approach LOS B B C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200932: Finch Avenue & Duncanwoods Drive

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 32

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 20 1300 20 17 1500 94 14 17 32 57 45 20Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.4 3.8 3.0 3.5 3.5 2.9 3.0 3.7 2.7 2.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.95Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 3330 1321 1685 3275 1566 1665 1516 1504 1635Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.72 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 181 3330 1321 259 3275 1566 1245 1516 1144 1635Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 22 1413 22 18 1630 102 15 18 35 62 49 22RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 33 0 29 0 0 18 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 22 1413 15 18 1630 69 15 24 0 62 53 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 6% 25% 0% 9% 2% 0% 10% 3% 8% 0% 3%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0Effective Green, g (s) 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 122 2248 892 175 2211 1057 218 265 200 286v/s Ratio Prot 0.42 c0.50 0.02 0.03v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.01 0.07 0.04 0.01 c0.05v/c Ratio 0.18 0.63 0.02 0.10 0.74 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.31 0.18Uniform Delay, d1 4.8 7.3 4.3 4.5 8.4 4.4 27.6 27.7 28.8 28.1Progression Factor 0.79 1.04 0.65 0.47 0.55 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 1.2 0.0 0.9 1.7 0.1 0.6 0.7 4.0 1.4Delay (s) 6.7 8.8 2.8 3.0 6.3 0.7 28.2 28.3 32.8 29.6Level of Service A A A A A A C C C CApproach Delay (s) 8.7 5.9 28.3 31.1Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 8.5 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 64: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200933: Finch Avenue & Pearldale Avenue

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 33

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 23 1150 28 19 1400 6 47 15 12 48 34 40Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.1 3.6 3.5 2.8 2.9 3.7 3.2 3.3 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1550 3336 1601 1578 3312 1521 1645 1613 1568 1497Flt Permitted 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.74 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 206 3336 1601 314 3312 1521 1220 1613 1219 1497Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 25 1250 30 21 1522 7 51 16 13 52 37 43RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 9 0 0 2 0 11 0 0 37 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 25 1250 21 21 1522 5 51 18 0 52 43 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 10% 7% 2% 8% 9% 5% 0% 0% 3% 10% 9% 16%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Effective Green, g (s) 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 142 2294 1101 216 2277 1046 183 242 183 225v/s Ratio Prot 0.37 c0.46 0.01 0.03v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.04 c0.04v/c Ratio 0.18 0.54 0.02 0.10 0.67 0.00 0.28 0.07 0.28 0.19Uniform Delay, d1 4.4 6.2 4.0 4.2 7.2 3.9 30.2 29.2 30.2 29.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 0.78 0.31 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 0.9 0.0 0.6 1.1 0.0 3.8 0.6 3.9 1.9Delay (s) 7.1 7.2 4.0 1.8 6.7 1.2 33.9 29.8 34.0 31.7Level of Service A A A A A A C C C CApproach Delay (s) 7.1 6.6 32.4 32.6Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 8.6 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.9% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200934: Finch Avenue & Islington Avenue

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 34

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 112 883 51 296 929 98 48 1265 324 105 497 126Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.7 3.8 3.6 3.2 3.7 3.4 3.0 4.2 4.1 3.2 3.7 3.6Total Lost time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1562 3481 1568 1627 3411 1462 1636 3667 1624 1627 3510 1509Flt Permitted 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 0.36 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 274 3481 1568 321 3411 1462 618 3667 1624 228 3510 1509Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 122 960 55 322 1010 107 52 1375 352 114 540 137RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 32 0 0 52 0 0 197 0 0 96Lane Group Flow (vph) 122 960 23 322 1010 55 52 1375 155 114 540 41Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 6% 3% 6% 7% 8% 3% 5% 5% 6% 4% 7%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 54.0 42.0 42.0 54.0 42.0 42.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 54.0 42.0 42.0 54.0 42.0 42.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.42 0.42 0.54 0.42 0.42 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30Clearance Time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 303 1462 659 330 1433 614 185 1100 487 68 1053 453v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.28 c0.12 c0.30 0.37 0.15v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.01 0.41 0.04 0.08 0.10 c0.50 0.03v/c Ratio 0.40 0.66 0.04 0.98 0.70 0.09 0.28 1.25 0.32 1.68 0.51 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 13.5 23.2 17.1 16.6 23.9 17.5 26.8 35.0 27.1 35.0 29.0 25.2Progression Factor 2.01 1.48 2.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 1.6 0.1 43.8 2.9 0.3 3.8 120.2 1.7 359.9 1.8 0.4Delay (s) 29.8 35.9 47.2 60.4 26.8 17.8 30.5 155.2 28.8 394.9 30.7 25.6Level of Service C D D E C B C F C F C CApproach Delay (s) 35.8 33.7 126.5 82.3Approach LOS D C F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 73.7 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.08Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.4% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 65: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200935: Finch Avenue & Kipling Avenue

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 35

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 237 655 47 278 916 258 15 657 255 268 613 251Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.6 3.8 3.4 3.0 3.7 2.9 3.0 3.7 3.4 3.3 3.7 3.5Total Lost time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1486 3386 1361 1574 3380 1379 1491 3318 1436 1711 3411 1521Flt Permitted 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 198 3386 1361 503 3380 1379 501 3318 1436 525 3411 1521Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 258 712 51 302 996 280 16 714 277 291 666 273RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 32 0 0 63 0 0 155 0 0 121Lane Group Flow (vph) 258 712 19 302 996 217 16 714 122 291 666 152Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 9% 16% 7% 8% 8% 13% 10% 10% 2% 7% 5%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 47.0 38.0 38.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0Effective Green, g (s) 47.0 38.0 38.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.38 0.38 0.43 0.36 0.36 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39Clearance Time (s) 2.0 7.0 7.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 209 1287 517 291 1217 496 195 1294 560 205 1330 593v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.21 0.07 0.29 0.22 0.20v/s Ratio Perm 0.47 0.01 c0.37 0.16 0.03 0.09 c0.55 0.10v/c Ratio 1.23 0.55 0.04 1.04 0.82 0.44 0.08 0.55 0.22 1.42 0.50 0.26Uniform Delay, d1 21.8 24.3 19.5 26.1 29.0 24.3 19.2 23.7 20.3 30.5 23.1 20.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.35 0.99 1.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 139.7 1.7 0.1 59.9 5.6 2.5 0.8 1.7 0.9 214.9 1.3 1.0Delay (s) 161.6 26.1 19.6 95.2 34.2 30.7 20.0 25.4 21.2 245.4 24.5 21.7Level of Service F C B F C C C C C F C CApproach Delay (s) 60.0 45.3 24.2 76.1Approach LOS E D C E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 51.8 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.16Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.3% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200936: Finch Avenue & Albion Mall

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 36

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 977 61 39 946 47 73Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3525 1767 3579 1789 1497Flt Permitted 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3525 380 3579 1789 1497Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1062 66 42 1028 51 79RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 0 0 0 0 59Lane Group Flow (vph) 1123 0 42 1028 51 20Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 32 32 149 32Turn Type Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2Permitted Phases 8 2Actuated Green, G (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 23.0 23.0Effective Green, g (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 23.0 23.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.26 0.26Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2311 249 2346 457 383v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 0.29 c0.03v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.01v/c Ratio 0.49 0.17 0.44 0.11 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 7.8 6.0 7.5 25.7 25.3Progression Factor 2.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 1.5 0.6 0.5 0.3Delay (s) 16.7 7.5 8.1 26.2 25.5Level of Service B A A C CApproach Delay (s) 16.7 8.1 25.8Approach LOS B A C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 13.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.38Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 66: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200937: Albion Road & Finch Avenue

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 37

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 12 664 342 40 593 345 288 936 26 246 937 12Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.4 3.5 3.3 2.6 3.7 4.2 3.0 3.5 3.1 2.7 3.7 3.4Total Lost time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1372 3368 1487 1514 3476 1625 1574 3368 1220 1490 3510 1490Flt Permitted 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 503 3368 1487 484 3476 1625 214 3368 1220 202 3510 1490Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 13 722 372 43 645 375 313 1017 28 267 1018 13RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 84 0 0 84 0 0 18 0 0 9Lane Group Flow (vph) 13 722 288 43 645 291 313 1017 10 267 1018 4Heavy Vehicles (%) 14% 6% 5% 6% 5% 6% 7% 6% 25% 9% 4% 6%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 35.0 31.0 31.0 35.0 31.0 31.0Effective Green, g (s) 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 35.0 31.0 31.0 35.0 31.0 31.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.39 0.34 0.34 0.39 0.34 0.34Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 207 1385 611 199 1429 668 144 1160 420 136 1209 513v/s Ratio Prot c0.21 0.19 c0.10 0.30 0.09 0.29v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.19 0.09 0.18 c0.75 0.01 0.68 0.00v/c Ratio 0.06 0.52 0.47 0.22 0.45 0.44 2.17 0.88 0.02 1.96 0.84 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 16.0 19.9 19.4 17.1 19.2 19.0 25.6 27.7 19.5 25.6 27.2 19.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 0.82 0.65Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 1.4 2.6 2.5 1.0 2.1 550.3 9.4 0.1 457.8 6.9 0.0Delay (s) 16.6 21.3 22.0 19.6 20.2 21.1 576.0 37.1 19.6 476.1 29.1 12.6Level of Service B C C B C C F D B F C BApproach Delay (s) 21.4 20.5 161.0 120.9Approach LOS C C F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 87.2 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.27Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.4% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200938: Finch Avenue & Martin Grove Road

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 38

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 83 745 107 77 898 11 127 812 274 25 406 121Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.6 3.7 3.7 2.8 3.1 3.7 2.8 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1383 3312 1495 3125 1455 3292 1304 1612 3366Flt Permitted 0.16 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.38 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 237 3312 238 3125 578 3292 1304 339 3366Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 90 810 116 84 976 12 138 883 298 27 441 132RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 146 0 35 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 90 912 0 84 987 0 138 883 152 27 538 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 16% 8% 9% 10% 9% 0% 13% 6% 17% 7% 4% 12%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 34.0 28.0 38.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 34.0 28.0 38.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.35 0.48 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38Clearance Time (s) 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 187 1159 239 1172 217 1235 489 127 1262v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 0.28 c0.04 c0.32 c0.27 0.16v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.13 0.24 0.12 0.08v/c Ratio 0.48 0.79 0.35 0.84 0.64 0.71 0.31 0.21 0.43Uniform Delay, d1 15.3 23.3 13.5 22.8 20.5 21.3 17.7 17.0 18.6Progression Factor 1.14 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 7.9 5.0 4.0 7.4 13.4 3.6 1.7 3.8 1.1Delay (s) 25.5 23.2 17.5 30.2 33.9 24.9 19.3 20.8 19.7Level of Service C C B C C C B C BApproach Delay (s) 23.4 29.2 24.6 19.7Approach LOS C C C B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 24.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.9% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 67: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200939: Finch Avenue & Silverstone Drive

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 39

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 20 900 24 61 1031 24 30 41 127 18 28 19Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.8 3.8 3.7 2.9 3.8 3.7 3.1 3.1 3.7 3.2 3.3 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.94Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1551 3372 1541 3370 1445 1464 1597 1599Flt Permitted 0.22 1.00 0.26 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.56 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 356 3372 426 3370 1101 1464 948 1599Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 22 978 26 66 1121 26 33 45 138 20 30 21RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 116 0 0 18 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 22 1002 0 66 1145 0 33 67 0 20 33 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 9% 9% 8% 9% 15% 18% 17% 6% 8% 9% 6%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0Effective Green, g (s) 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 245 2318 293 2317 179 238 154 260v/s Ratio Prot 0.30 c0.34 c0.05 0.02v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.15 0.03 0.02v/c Ratio 0.09 0.43 0.23 0.49 0.18 0.28 0.13 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 4.2 5.6 4.6 5.9 28.9 29.4 28.7 28.7Progression Factor 0.72 0.70 0.66 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.5 1.1 0.5 2.3 3.0 1.7 1.0Delay (s) 3.7 4.4 4.1 6.9 31.2 32.4 30.4 29.7Level of Service A A A A C C C CApproach Delay (s) 4.4 6.7 32.2 29.9Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 8.6 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200940: Finch Avenue & Westmore Drive

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 40

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 142 805 19 73 978 86 19 64 74 113 61 142Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.6 4.0 2.4 3.2 3.8 3.7 2.7 2.7 3.7 3.2 4.6 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.90Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1558 3517 1675 3425 1624 1524 1675 1813Flt Permitted 0.18 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.57 1.00 0.66 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 296 3517 480 3425 972 1524 1166 1813Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 154 875 21 79 1063 93 21 70 80 123 66 154RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 8 0 0 51 0 0 63 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 154 894 0 79 1148 0 21 99 0 123 157 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 7% 0% 3% 7% 0% 0% 0% 6% 3% 0% 6%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0Effective Green, g (s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 167 1978 270 1927 279 438 335 521v/s Ratio Prot 0.25 0.34 0.06 0.09v/s Ratio Perm c0.52 0.16 0.02 c0.11v/c Ratio 0.92 0.45 0.29 0.60 0.08 0.23 0.37 0.30Uniform Delay, d1 15.9 10.3 9.2 11.5 20.8 21.7 22.7 22.2Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.99 2.13 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 51.6 0.7 2.5 1.2 0.5 1.2 3.1 1.5Delay (s) 67.5 11.0 20.7 25.8 21.3 22.9 25.8 23.7Level of Service E B C C C C C CApproach Delay (s) 19.3 25.5 22.7 24.5Approach LOS B C C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.9% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 68: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200941: Finch Avenue & Highway 27

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 41

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 86 575 55 225 1183 63 167 1883 181 99 809 46Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.9 3.7 3.7 3.1 4.0 3.7 3.1 3.6 3.9 3.1 3.8 3.4Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1541 3265 1564 3593 1509 3343 1560 1655 3481 1327Flt Permitted 0.15 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 240 3265 244 3593 377 3343 1560 104 3481 1327Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 93 625 60 245 1286 68 182 2047 197 108 879 50RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 0 95 0 0 24Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 679 0 245 1351 0 182 2047 102 108 879 26Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 9% 24% 9% 4% 7% 13% 8% 7% 3% 6% 19%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 38.0 27.0 38.0 27.0 76.0 67.0 67.0 76.0 67.0 67.0Effective Green, g (s) 38.0 27.0 38.0 27.0 76.0 67.0 67.0 76.0 67.0 67.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.21 0.29 0.21 0.58 0.52 0.52 0.58 0.52 0.52Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 180 678 183 746 299 1723 804 168 1794 684v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.21 c0.11 c0.38 0.04 c0.61 c0.04 0.25v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.28 0.31 0.07 0.33 0.02v/c Ratio 0.52 1.00 1.34 1.81 0.61 1.19 0.13 0.64 0.49 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 36.8 51.5 40.8 51.5 14.6 31.5 16.3 29.4 20.4 15.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.15 1.64 5.27 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 10.2 35.1 184.6 370.2 7.7 90.0 0.3 17.4 1.0 0.1Delay (s) 47.0 86.6 225.3 421.7 39.1 141.6 86.4 46.8 21.4 15.7Level of Service D F F F D F F D C BApproach Delay (s) 81.9 391.6 129.4 23.8Approach LOS F F F C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 176.1 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.31Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.3% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200942: Humber College Blvd & Highway 27

Existing PM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 42

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 188 221 365 223 267 11 246 1266 278 71 946 91Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1825 3268 1825 3623 1807 3476 1633 1755 3444 1617Flt Permitted 0.45 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 862 3268 274 3623 300 3476 1633 123 3444 1617Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 204 240 397 242 290 12 267 1376 302 77 1028 99RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 151 0 0 2 0 0 0 68 0 0 49Lane Group Flow (vph) 204 486 0 242 300 0 267 1376 234 77 1028 50Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 4% 1% 5% 0% 4% 6% 1%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 44.0 28.0 44.0 28.0 70.0 60.0 60.0 70.0 60.0 60.0Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 28.0 44.0 28.0 70.0 60.0 60.0 70.0 60.0 60.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.22 0.34 0.22 0.54 0.46 0.46 0.54 0.46 0.46Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 410 704 284 780 277 1604 754 192 1590 746v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 0.15 c0.11 0.08 c0.07 0.40 0.03 0.30v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 c0.18 c0.44 0.14 0.19 0.03v/c Ratio 0.50 0.69 0.85 0.38 0.96 0.86 0.31 0.40 0.65 0.07Uniform Delay, d1 32.2 47.0 34.8 43.6 22.5 31.2 22.0 23.2 26.9 19.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.77 0.84 0.53Incremental Delay, d2 4.3 5.5 26.2 1.4 45.6 6.2 1.1 4.5 1.5 0.1Delay (s) 36.5 52.5 61.0 45.1 68.1 37.4 23.1 45.6 24.2 10.5Level of Service D D E D E D C D C BApproach Delay (s) 48.6 52.1 39.4 24.4Approach LOS D D D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 38.6 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.3% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 69: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20091: Finch Avenue & Yonge Street

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 1

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 59 98 654 257 98 719 163 189 1322 152 105 1492 78Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.8 3.6 2.9 3.6 3.1 4.0 2.8 3.5 3.7 3.2 3.6 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1431 2869 1424 2753 1480 4245 1522 4507Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.09 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 159 2869 158 2753 142 4245 146 4507Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 64 107 711 279 107 782 177 205 1437 165 114 1622 85RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 35 0 0 16 0 0 12 0 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 171 955 0 107 943 0 205 1590 0 114 1703 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 145 76 76 145 182 604 604 182Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 4% 6% 4% 14% 6% 3% 0% 2% 9% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt pm+ptProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 48.0 38.0 48.0 38.0 56.0 44.0 56.0 44.0Effective Green, g (s) 48.0 38.0 48.0 38.0 56.0 44.0 56.0 44.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.32 0.40 0.32 0.47 0.37 0.47 0.37Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 170 909 169 872 200 1557 206 1653v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.33 0.05 c0.34 c0.10 0.37 0.06 c0.38v/s Ratio Perm 0.32 0.20 0.38 0.20v/c Ratio 1.01 1.05 0.63 1.08 1.02 1.02 0.55 1.03Uniform Delay, d1 30.8 41.0 27.6 41.0 34.8 38.0 24.0 38.0Progression Factor 0.68 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 67.4 42.8 16.7 54.8 70.3 28.3 10.3 30.2Delay (s) 88.2 73.5 44.3 95.8 105.1 66.3 34.3 68.2Level of Service F E D F F E C EApproach Delay (s) 75.6 90.6 70.7 66.1Approach LOS E F E E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 73.9 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.05Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.1% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20092: Finch Avenue & Greenview

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 2

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 56 18 1055 29 57 18 1024 15 80 8 32 28 13 22Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1767 3493 1788 3494 1749 2934 1688 3026Flt Permitted 0.21 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.73 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 396 3493 375 3494 1346 2934 1291 3026Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 61 20 1147 32 62 20 1113 16 87 9 35 30 14 24RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 27 0 0 19 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 81 1177 0 0 82 1128 0 87 17 0 30 19 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 53 23 23 53 15 18 18 15Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 1% 4% 0% 2% 0% 4% 7% 1% 13% 3% 4% 8% 5%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0Effective Green, g (s) 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 281 2474 266 2475 303 660 290 681v/s Ratio Prot c0.34 0.32 0.01 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.22 c0.06 0.02v/c Ratio 0.29 0.48 0.31 0.46 0.29 0.03 0.10 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 6.4 7.7 6.5 7.5 38.5 36.2 36.9 36.3Progression Factor 1.18 1.38 1.82 1.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.5 0.7 0.1 2.4 0.1 0.7 0.1Delay (s) 9.7 11.2 12.6 13.5 40.9 36.3 37.6 36.3Level of Service A B B B D D D DApproach Delay (s) 11.1 13.4 39.4 36.9Approach LOS B B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.43Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 70: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20093: Finch Avenue & Talbot Road

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 3

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 105 103 992 0 80 10 1469 45 4 0 0 118 0 143Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.9 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.0 3.3 2.9 3.7 4.8 3.7 3.5 2.7 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1632 3400 1655 3337 963 1746 1335Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.60 0.76 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1632 3400 1655 3337 604 1388 1335Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 114 112 1078 0 87 11 1597 49 4 0 0 128 0 155RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 28 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 226 1078 0 0 98 1644 0 0 4 0 128 127 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 55 57 12 16 12 57 55 16 16 55Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 0% 2% 0% 4% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 17.0 59.0 17.0 59.0 28.0 28.0 28.0Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 59.0 17.0 59.0 28.0 28.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.49 0.14 0.49 0.23 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 231 1672 234 1641 141 324 312v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.32 0.06 c0.49 c0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.09v/c Ratio 0.98 0.64 0.42 1.00 0.03 0.40 0.41Uniform Delay, d1 51.3 22.7 47.0 30.5 35.5 38.8 39.0Progression Factor 1.07 0.99 0.91 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 48.6 1.6 5.2 22.2 0.4 3.6 3.9Delay (s) 103.3 24.1 48.0 55.7 35.9 42.4 42.9Level of Service F C D E D D DApproach Delay (s) 37.8 55.3 35.9 42.7Approach LOS D E D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 47.4 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.7% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20094: Finch Avenue & Edithvale

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1 1006 80 191 1091 6 14 0 66 3 1 25Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.87Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3539 1789 3575 3108 3096Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.92 0.94Satd. Flow (perm) 229 3539 236 3575 2881 2930Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1 1093 87 208 1186 7 15 0 72 3 1 27RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 55 0 0 24 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 1175 0 208 1192 0 0 32 0 0 7 0Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 80.0 59.0 80.0 59.0 28.0 28.0Effective Green, g (s) 80.0 59.0 80.0 59.0 28.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.67 0.49 0.67 0.49 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 426 1740 429 1758 672 684v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.33 c0.08 c0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.24 c0.01 0.00v/c Ratio 0.00 0.68 0.48 0.68 0.05 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 10.1 23.2 13.7 23.3 35.7 35.4Progression Factor 1.51 0.94 2.00 0.82 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.2 1.2 0.7 0.1 0.0Delay (s) 15.2 21.9 28.6 19.8 35.8 35.4Level of Service B C C B D DApproach Delay (s) 21.9 21.1 35.8 35.4Approach LOS C C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.1 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.4% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 71: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20095: Finch Avenue & Senlac Road

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 5

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 990 306 273 191 1019 0 256 0 118 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 7.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00Frt 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3232 1804 3444 1642 1567Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.76 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3232 1804 3444 1309 1567Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1076 333 297 208 1108 0 278 0 128 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1384 0 0 505 1108 0 278 42 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 30 30 53 7 7 53Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 2Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 8% 1% 2% 0% 6% 0% 3% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 46.0 31.0 81.0 26.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 31.0 81.0 26.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.26 0.68 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 7.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1239 466 2325 284 340v/s Ratio Prot c0.43 c0.28 0.32 0.03v/s Ratio Perm c0.21v/c Ratio 1.12 1.08 0.48 0.98 0.12Uniform Delay, d1 37.0 44.5 9.3 46.7 37.8Progression Factor 0.68 1.27 1.31 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 63.3 63.7 0.6 48.3 0.7Delay (s) 88.5 120.0 12.9 95.0 38.6Level of Service F F B F DApproach Delay (s) 88.5 46.4 77.2 0.0Approach LOS F D E A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 67.4 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.07Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.3% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20096: Finch & Grantbrook

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 6

Movement EBU EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 111 57 1079 1205 53 156 162Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1801 3544 3586 1807 1595Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1801 3544 3586 1807 1595Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 121 62 1173 1310 58 170 176RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 3 0 0 76Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 183 1173 1365 0 170 100Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 24 24 3 1Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 3% 1% 0% 1% 1%Turn Type Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 8 6Permitted Phases 6Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 83.0 58.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 83.0 58.0 29.0 29.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.69 0.48 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 315 2451 1733 437 385v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.33 c0.38 c0.09v/s Ratio Perm 0.06v/c Ratio 0.58 0.48 0.79 0.39 0.26Uniform Delay, d1 45.5 8.5 25.9 38.1 36.8Progression Factor 1.38 0.33 0.90 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 6.4 0.6 3.1 2.6 1.6Delay (s) 69.0 3.4 26.2 40.7 38.5Level of Service E A C D DApproach Delay (s) 12.3 26.2 39.5Approach LOS B C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 21.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.1% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 72: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20097: Finch & Finchurst

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 7

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 128 0 1090 10 63 10 1370 0 10 0 10 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3574 1789 3579 1789 1601Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1789 3574 1789 3579 1789 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 139 0 1185 11 68 11 1489 0 11 0 11 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 139 1196 0 0 79 1489 0 11 0 2 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot custom customProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 17.0 64.0 17.0 64.0 27.0 27.0Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 64.0 17.0 64.0 27.0 27.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.53 0.14 0.53 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 253 1906 253 1909 403 360v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.33 0.04 c0.42v/s Ratio Perm c0.01 0.00v/c Ratio 0.55 0.63 0.31 0.78 0.03 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 47.9 19.6 46.3 22.4 36.3 36.1Progression Factor 0.64 2.17 1.04 0.73 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.0 0.6 2.1 2.2 0.1 0.0Delay (s) 33.5 43.2 50.1 18.4 36.4 36.1Level of Service C D D B D DApproach Delay (s) 42.2 20.0 36.3 0.0Approach LOS D C D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 30.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.56Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20098: Finch Avenue & Bathurst Street

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 8

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 195 213 833 137 77 148 900 23 169 822 100 116 922 409Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.5 3.5 2.9 3.7 3.0 3.9 3.6 3.0 3.5 3.2 3.0 4.0 2.9Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 0.89Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1530 3214 1652 3599 1668 3433 1144 1631 3625 1293Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1530 3214 1652 3599 207 3433 1144 202 3625 1293Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 212 232 905 149 84 161 978 25 184 893 109 126 1002 445RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 49 0 0 52Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 444 1043 0 0 245 1002 0 184 893 60 126 1002 393Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 99 80 172 184 172 80 99 184 184 99Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 5% 6% 4% 2% 2% 3% 4% 1% 4% 2% 3% 4% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 29.0 33.0 29.0 33.0 42.0 34.0 34.0 42.0 34.0 34.0Effective Green, g (s) 29.0 33.0 29.0 33.0 42.0 34.0 34.0 42.0 34.0 34.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.28 0.24 0.28 0.35 0.28 0.28 0.35 0.28 0.28Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 370 884 399 990 170 973 324 166 1027 366v/s Ratio Prot c0.29 c0.32 0.15 0.28 c0.07 0.26 0.05 0.28v/s Ratio Perm c0.31 0.05 0.22 0.30v/c Ratio 1.20 1.18 0.61 1.01 1.08 0.92 0.19 0.76 0.98 1.07Uniform Delay, d1 45.5 43.5 40.5 43.5 34.5 41.6 32.5 30.8 42.6 43.0Progression Factor 1.31 1.26 1.04 1.45 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 108.1 90.0 4.4 25.7 92.7 14.8 1.3 27.3 22.8 67.8Delay (s) 167.8 145.0 46.6 88.6 127.1 56.4 33.8 58.1 65.4 110.8Level of Service F F D F F E C E E FApproach Delay (s) 151.7 80.3 65.3 77.7Approach LOS F F E E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 95.8 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.15Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.3% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 73: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20099: Finch Avenue & Virgilwood Drive

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 9

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 34 21 1162 35 75 37 1680 33 30 4 24 32 0 30Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.1 3.9 3.4 3.7 3.1 3.7 3.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 3.7 4.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.93Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1653 3573 1682 3498 1827 1868Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.84 0.84Satd. Flow (perm) 1653 3573 1682 3498 1575 1612Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 37 23 1263 38 82 40 1826 36 33 4 26 35 0 33RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 20 0 0 25 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 60 1299 0 0 122 1861 0 0 44 0 0 43 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 14 4 37 4 14 25 37 37 25Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 5% 4% 0% 2% 0% 4% 0% 3% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 16.5 59.0 16.5 59.0 30.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 16.5 59.0 16.5 59.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.49 0.14 0.49 0.25 0.25Clearance Time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 227 1757 231 1720 394 403v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.36 c0.07 c0.53v/s Ratio Perm c0.03 0.03v/c Ratio 0.26 0.74 0.53 1.08 0.11 0.11Uniform Delay, d1 46.3 24.4 48.1 30.5 34.7 34.7Progression Factor 1.33 0.30 0.90 1.25 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 2.5 2.5 40.6 0.6 0.5Delay (s) 64.1 9.9 46.0 78.7 35.3 35.2Level of Service E A D E D DApproach Delay (s) 12.2 76.7 35.3 35.2Approach LOS B E D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 49.9 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200910: Finch Avenue & Torresdale Avenue

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 10

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 91 34 945 35 37 29 1457 36 84 0 75 109 3 125Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.0 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.0 3.6 2.8 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.91Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1647 3464 1570 3299 1523 1380 1623 1398Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.70 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1647 3464 1570 3299 1012 1380 1202 1398Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 99 37 1027 38 40 32 1584 39 91 0 82 118 3 136RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 44 0 0 38 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 136 1063 0 0 72 1622 0 91 38 0 118 101 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 62 21 86 52 86 21 62 52 52 62Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 3% 5% 17% 2% 14% 9% 6% 5% 0% 7% 6% 0% 5%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 13.5 63.0 13.5 63.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 13.5 63.0 13.5 63.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.52 0.11 0.52 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 185 1819 177 1732 245 334 290 338v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.31 0.05 c0.49 0.03 0.07v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 c0.10v/c Ratio 0.74 0.58 0.41 0.94 0.37 0.11 0.41 0.30Uniform Delay, d1 51.5 19.5 49.5 26.6 37.9 35.5 38.3 37.2Progression Factor 0.60 1.72 1.14 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 12.2 0.7 0.6 1.3 4.3 0.7 4.2 2.3Delay (s) 43.1 34.3 56.9 17.9 42.2 36.2 42.5 39.4Level of Service D C E B D D D DApproach Delay (s) 35.3 19.5 39.3 40.8Approach LOS D B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 27.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.9% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 74: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200911: Finch Avenue West & Wilmington Avenue

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 11

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 27 0 1005 143 26 276 1376 0 168 0 183 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.7 4.0 2.8 3.7 2.8 4.2 3.7 2.7 3.7 2.8 3.7 3.7 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3472 1627 3703 1577 1410Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1789 3472 1627 3703 1577 1410Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 29 0 1092 155 28 300 1496 0 183 0 199 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 29 1238 0 0 328 1496 0 183 0 46 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 1 16 51 1 1 51Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 6% 4% 2% 1% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot customProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 30.5 46.0 30.5 46.0 28.0 28.0Effective Green, g (s) 30.5 46.0 30.5 46.0 28.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.38 0.25 0.38 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 455 1331 414 1419 368 329v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.36 c0.20 c0.40 c0.12v/s Ratio Perm 0.03v/c Ratio 0.06 0.93 0.79 1.05 0.50 0.14Uniform Delay, d1 33.9 35.5 41.8 37.0 39.9 36.5Progression Factor 0.95 0.99 0.68 1.51 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 11.2 7.4 33.2 4.7 0.9Delay (s) 32.3 46.3 35.7 89.2 44.6 37.4Level of Service C D D F D DApproach Delay (s) 46.0 79.5 40.8 0.0Approach LOS D E D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 63.0 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.1% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200912: Finch Avenue & Dufferin Street

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 12

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 181 31 453 314 7 234 886 283 255 1440 194 82 1322 22Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.7 2.5 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.4 3.9 2.9 3.9 3.4Total Lost time (s) 2.5 7.0 2.5 7.0 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1613 2926 1539 3217 1585 4653 1601 5131Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.12 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1613 2926 1539 3217 196 4653 198 5131Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 197 34 492 341 8 254 963 308 277 1565 211 89 1437 24RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 105 0 0 0 26 0 0 14 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 231 728 0 0 262 1245 0 277 1762 0 89 1460 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 15 110 68 96 68 110 15 96 96 15Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 10% 9% 13% 2% 3% 5% 1% 5% 5% 9% 4% 4% 14%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+pt pm+ptProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 16.5 39.0 16.5 39.0 46.5 34.0 46.5 34.0Effective Green, g (s) 16.5 39.0 16.5 39.0 46.5 34.0 46.5 34.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.32 0.14 0.32 0.39 0.28 0.39 0.28Clearance Time (s) 2.5 7.0 2.5 7.0 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 222 951 212 1046 221 1318 223 1454v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 0.25 c0.17 c0.39 c0.13 c0.38 0.04 0.28v/s Ratio Perm 0.36 0.11v/c Ratio 1.04 0.77 1.24 1.19 1.25 1.34 0.40 1.00Uniform Delay, d1 51.8 36.4 51.8 40.5 33.2 43.0 27.8 43.0Progression Factor 0.95 1.89 0.71 1.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 29.7 0.6 117.0 88.6 145.6 156.7 5.3 24.5Delay (s) 79.1 69.4 153.8 154.0 178.8 199.7 33.1 67.5Level of Service E E F F F F C EApproach Delay (s) 71.5 154.0 196.9 65.5Approach LOS E F F E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 131.9 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.25Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.5% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 75: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200913: Finch Avenue & Alness Street

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 13

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 264 276 1073 22 123 97 1083 241 29 105 54 228 183 215Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.0 3.5 3.6 3.7 2.8 3.5 3.3 4.2 4.2 3.7 4.4 4.4 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1643 3356 1585 3256 1733 1842 1456 1817 1952 1468Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.68 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1643 3356 1585 3256 993 1842 1456 1308 1952 1468Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 287 300 1166 24 134 105 1177 262 32 114 59 248 199 234RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 44 0 0 90Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 587 1189 0 0 239 1423 0 32 114 15 248 199 144Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 22 30 26 29 26 30 22 29 29 22Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 3% 6% 0% 2% 6% 6% 2% 10% 10% 7% 6% 6% 7%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 30.0 35.0 30.0 35.0 34.0 30.0 30.0 34.0 30.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 30.0 35.0 30.0 35.0 34.0 30.0 30.0 34.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.29 0.25 0.29 0.28 0.25 0.25 0.28 0.25 0.25Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 411 979 396 950 306 461 364 388 488 367v/s Ratio Prot c0.36 0.35 0.15 c0.44 0.00 0.06 c0.02 0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.01 c0.16 0.10v/c Ratio 1.43 1.21 0.60 1.50 0.10 0.25 0.04 0.64 0.41 0.39Uniform Delay, d1 45.0 42.5 39.7 42.5 31.5 36.0 34.1 36.9 37.6 37.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.31 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 206.3 105.8 0.6 224.8 0.7 1.3 0.2 7.8 2.5 3.1Delay (s) 251.3 148.3 52.8 267.9 32.2 37.3 34.3 44.7 40.1 40.6Level of Service F F D F C D C D D DApproach Delay (s) 182.4 237.3 35.6 41.9Approach LOS F F D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 174.6 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.15Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.2% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200914: Finch Avenue & Chesswood Drive

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 14

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 96 8 1206 305 201 90 1256 11 218 4 67 6 0 1Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.3 3.4 3.7 3.7 3.0 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1603 3213 1622 3339 1016 794 1631 1438Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.71 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1603 3213 1622 3339 810 794 1213 1438Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 104 9 1311 332 218 98 1365 12 237 4 73 7 0 1RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 19 0 0 0 1 0 0 55 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 113 1624 0 0 316 1376 0 237 22 0 7 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 10 7 43 7 10 29 43 43 29Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 88% 5% 9% 2% 8% 8% 0% 73% 9% 100% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+pt pm+ptProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 45.0 20.0 45.0 34.0 30.0 34.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 45.0 20.0 45.0 34.0 30.0 34.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.38 0.17 0.38 0.28 0.25 0.28 0.25Clearance Time (s) 4.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 267 1205 270 1252 236 199 358 360v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.51 c0.19 0.41 c0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00v/s Ratio Perm c0.25 0.00v/c Ratio 0.42 1.35 1.17 1.10 1.00 0.11 0.02 0.00Uniform Delay, d1 44.8 37.5 50.0 37.5 42.5 34.7 30.9 33.8Progression Factor 1.28 1.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.5 160.6 108.9 57.1 59.7 1.1 0.1 0.0Delay (s) 61.0 200.8 158.9 94.6 102.2 35.9 31.0 33.8Level of Service E F F F F D C CApproach Delay (s) 191.8 106.6 85.9 31.4Approach LOS F F F C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 144.4 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.17Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.5% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 76: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200915: Finch Avenue & Driveway

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 10 1541 10 15 1472 5 10 0 5 5 0 10Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3575 1789 3577 1789 1601 1789 1601Flt Permitted 0.09 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.75 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 174 3575 148 3577 1413 1601 1421 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 11 1675 11 16 1600 5 11 0 5 5 0 11RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 8 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 1686 0 16 1605 0 11 1 0 5 3 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 115 2354 97 2355 389 440 391 440v/s Ratio Prot c0.47 0.45 0.00 0.00v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.11 c0.01 0.00v/c Ratio 0.10 0.72 0.16 0.68 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 7.5 13.3 7.9 12.7 31.8 31.6 31.6 31.6Progression Factor 1.44 1.05 1.23 1.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0Delay (s) 11.2 14.5 10.0 14.4 31.9 31.6 31.7 31.6Level of Service B B B B C C C CApproach Delay (s) 14.4 14.3 31.8 31.7Approach LOS B B C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.8% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200916: Finch Avenue & Alexdon

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 16

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 99 1 1520 44 230 100 1420 0 1 0 129 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3561 1789 3579 1761 1601Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.76 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1789 3561 1789 3579 1403 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 108 1 1652 48 250 109 1543 0 1 0 140 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 109 1698 0 0 359 1543 0 1 82 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 1 1 1 1 12 12Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 25.0 56.0 25.0 56.0 27.0 27.0Effective Green, g (s) 25.0 56.0 25.0 56.0 27.0 27.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.47 0.21 0.47 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 373 1662 373 1670 316 360v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.48 c0.20 0.43 c0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.00v/c Ratio 0.29 1.02 0.96 0.92 0.00 0.23Uniform Delay, d1 40.0 32.0 47.0 30.0 36.1 38.0Progression Factor 1.27 0.83 1.27 1.15 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 26.4 33.9 8.6 0.0 1.5Delay (s) 52.7 53.1 93.7 43.3 36.1 39.4Level of Service D D F D D DApproach Delay (s) 53.1 52.8 39.4 0.0Approach LOS D D D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 52.4 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.0% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 77: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200917: Finch Avenue & Tangiers Road

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 37 1251 108 60 980 46 52 17 50 51 13 11Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.9 3.7 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.7 2.8 3.6 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.93Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 3422 1614 3299 1478 1497 1559 3157Flt Permitted 0.21 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.71 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 374 3422 205 3299 1151 1497 1166 3157Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 40 1360 117 65 1065 50 57 18 54 55 14 12RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 41 0 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 40 1472 0 65 1112 0 57 31 0 55 17 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 28 12 12 28Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 8% 2% 8% 9% 2% 10% 0% 4% 4% 0% 9%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 246 2253 135 2172 278 362 282 763v/s Ratio Prot c0.43 0.34 0.02 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.32 c0.05 0.05v/c Ratio 0.16 0.65 0.48 0.51 0.21 0.09 0.20 0.02Uniform Delay, d1 7.8 12.3 10.3 10.6 36.3 35.2 36.2 34.7Progression Factor 0.91 0.74 1.18 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 5.4 0.4 1.7 0.5 1.5 0.1Delay (s) 7.3 9.2 17.5 10.5 38.0 35.7 37.8 34.7Level of Service A A B B D D D CApproach Delay (s) 9.1 10.9 36.7 36.8Approach LOS A B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 11.8 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.8% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200918: Finch Avenue & Keele Street

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 18

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 67 1039 193 320 58 638 290 148 853 146 294 782 55Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.1 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.0 3.3 2.6 3.0 3.6 3.2 3.0 3.2 2.6Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.69Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1550 3178 1622 2887 1524 3343 1320 1516 3165 893Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1550 3178 1622 2887 209 3343 1320 168 3165 893Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 73 1129 210 348 63 693 315 161 927 159 320 850 60RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 3 0 0 35Lane Group Flow (vph) 73 1326 0 0 411 964 0 161 927 156 320 850 25Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 160 187 88 187 160 336 88 88 336Heavy Vehicles (%) 10% 7% 18% 2% 14% 10% 9% 10% 8% 3% 11% 9% 11%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 16.0 40.0 16.0 40.0 48.0 38.0 38.0 48.0 38.0 38.0Effective Green, g (s) 16.0 40.0 16.0 40.0 48.0 38.0 38.0 48.0 38.0 38.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.33 0.13 0.33 0.40 0.32 0.32 0.40 0.32 0.32Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 207 1059 216 962 193 1059 418 180 1002 283v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.42 c0.25 0.33 0.07 0.28 c0.15 0.27v/s Ratio Perm 0.26 0.12 c0.56 0.03v/c Ratio 0.35 1.25 1.90 1.00 0.83 0.88 0.37 1.78 0.85 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 47.3 40.0 52.0 40.0 27.3 38.8 31.8 30.6 38.3 28.8Progression Factor 1.29 0.79 1.06 1.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 119.9 422.1 28.6 32.6 10.1 2.5 371.5 8.9 0.6Delay (s) 64.5 151.4 477.2 78.8 60.0 48.9 34.3 402.1 47.2 29.4Level of Service E F F E E D C F D CApproach Delay (s) 146.9 194.2 48.4 138.7Approach LOS F F D F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 134.5 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.60Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.8% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 78: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200919: Finch Avenue & Romfield Lane

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 24 1306 11 7 1039 7 6 3 19 2 7 24Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.5 3.5 2.9 3.7 3.7 2.6 3.7 4.8 3.7 3.7 4.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.90Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1716 3273 1825 3338 1687 1884Flt Permitted 0.21 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.95 0.99Satd. Flow (perm) 384 3273 268 3338 1626 1872Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 26 1420 12 8 1129 8 7 3 21 2 8 26RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 21 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 1431 0 8 1137 0 0 14 0 0 15 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 9% 0% 0% 9% 43% 17% 0% 16% 0% 0% 4%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 6 2Permitted Phases 4 8 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 83.0 83.0 83.0 83.0 25.0 25.0Effective Green, g (s) 83.0 83.0 83.0 83.0 25.0 25.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 266 2264 185 2309 339 390v/s Ratio Prot c0.44 0.34v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.03 c0.01 0.01v/c Ratio 0.10 0.63 0.04 0.49 0.04 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 6.1 10.1 5.9 8.6 37.9 37.9Progression Factor 2.17 2.21 1.17 0.97 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.2Delay (s) 13.5 22.7 7.2 8.9 38.2 38.1Level of Service B C A A D DApproach Delay (s) 22.6 8.9 38.2 38.1Approach LOS C A D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 17.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200920: Finch Avenue & Sentinel Road

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 20

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 56 177 1035 97 73 85 854 125 119 269 81 146 225 140Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.8 3.4 3.2 3.7 2.9 3.4 2.9 3.6 4.0 2.4 3.5 4.0 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.88Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1612 3181 1632 3070 1670 3412 1462 3010Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.42 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1612 3181 1632 3070 713 3412 651 3010Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 61 192 1125 105 79 92 928 136 129 292 88 159 245 152RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 6 0 0 0 10 0 0 24 0 0 62 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 253 1224 0 0 171 1054 0 129 356 0 159 335 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 234 135 132 128 132 135 234 128 128 234Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 8% 7% 2% 2% 12% 4% 2% 3% 1% 18% 5% 3%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+pt pm+ptProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 42.0 21.0 42.0 37.0 28.0 37.0 28.0Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 42.0 21.0 42.0 37.0 28.0 37.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.35 0.18 0.35 0.31 0.23 0.31 0.23Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 282 1113 286 1075 292 796 262 702v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 c0.38 0.10 0.34 0.03 0.10 c0.05 0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 c0.14v/c Ratio 0.90 1.10 0.60 0.98 0.44 0.45 0.61 0.48Uniform Delay, d1 48.4 39.0 45.6 38.6 31.3 39.4 32.9 39.7Progression Factor 0.94 0.78 1.00 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 16.3 51.1 8.1 21.9 4.8 1.8 10.0 2.3Delay (s) 62.0 81.4 53.9 61.3 36.1 41.2 43.0 42.0Level of Service E F D E D D D DApproach Delay (s) 78.1 60.3 39.9 42.3Approach LOS E E D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 61.9 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.3% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 79: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200921: Finch Avenue & Tobermory Drive

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 21

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 71 21 1548 0 75 0 1048 79 0 0 0 131 0 65Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.5 3.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.1 3.5 3.7 4.8 3.7 4.8 4.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.96Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1560 3240 1789 3244 1892Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.80Satd. Flow (perm) 1560 3240 1789 3244 1563Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 77 23 1683 0 82 0 1139 86 0 0 0 142 0 71RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 15 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 100 1683 0 0 82 1220 0 0 0 0 0 198 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 27 21 25 21 27 25 25 27Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 4% 0% 2% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 65.0 15.0 65.0 24.0Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 65.0 15.0 65.0 24.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.54 0.12 0.54 0.20Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 195 1755 224 1757 313v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 c0.52 0.05 0.38v/s Ratio Perm c0.13v/c Ratio 0.51 0.96 0.37 0.69 0.63Uniform Delay, d1 49.1 26.2 48.1 20.2 44.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.18 0.47 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 9.3 13.7 2.3 1.2 9.3Delay (s) 58.4 40.0 59.0 10.7 53.3Level of Service E D E B DApproach Delay (s) 41.0 13.8 0.0 53.3Approach LOS D B A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 31.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200922: Finch Avenue & Driftwood Avenue

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 22

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 32 12 1202 60 19 31 930 21 86 47 64 73 68 34Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.4 3.5 3.8 3.7 2.4 3.4 3.1 2.9 3.7 3.7 3.2 2.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1475 3305 1461 1534 3461 1495 1585 1499 1612 1382Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.66 1.00 0.64 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1475 3305 1461 1534 3461 1495 1101 1499 1084 1382Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 35 13 1307 65 21 34 1011 23 93 51 70 79 74 37RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 8 0 35 0 0 13 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 48 1307 49 0 55 1011 15 93 86 0 79 98 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 17% 8% 13% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 28% 9% 7% 24% 9%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 82.0 82.0 11.0 82.0 82.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 82.0 82.0 11.0 82.0 82.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.59 0.59 0.08 0.59 0.59 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 116 1936 856 121 2027 876 244 332 240 306v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.40 c0.04 0.29 0.06 0.07v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.01 c0.08 0.07v/c Ratio 0.41 0.68 0.06 0.45 0.50 0.02 0.38 0.26 0.33 0.32Uniform Delay, d1 61.4 19.9 12.4 61.6 17.0 12.1 46.3 45.0 45.8 45.7Progression Factor 0.92 0.84 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 0.7 0.0 11.8 0.9 0.0 4.5 1.9 3.6 2.7Delay (s) 60.2 17.3 13.5 73.5 17.9 12.2 50.8 46.9 49.4 48.4Level of Service E B B E B B D D D DApproach Delay (s) 18.6 20.5 48.6 48.8Approach LOS B C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 23.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 80: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200931: Finch Avenue & Milvan Drive

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 31

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 75 99 1032 55 87 16 795 257 69 49 6 106 52 51Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.0 3.7 2.4 3.7 2.8 3.6 3.3 3.0 3.2 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.1Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1607 3412 1617 3190 1589 1736 1376 1879 1152Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.72 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1607 3412 1617 3190 1204 1736 1040 1879 1152Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 82 108 1122 60 95 17 864 279 75 53 7 115 57 55RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 3 0 0 0 26 0 0 4 0 0 0 42Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 190 1179 0 0 112 1117 0 75 56 0 115 57 13Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 23 25 1 17 1 25 23 17 17 23Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 7% 6% 7% 2% 0% 8% 7% 3% 0% 20% 27% 0% 27%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 23.0 53.0 23.0 53.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0Effective Green, g (s) 23.0 53.0 23.0 53.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.44 0.19 0.44 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 308 1507 310 1409 281 405 243 438 269v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.35 0.07 c0.35 0.03 0.03v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.11 0.01v/c Ratio 0.62 0.78 0.36 0.79 0.27 0.14 0.47 0.13 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 44.5 28.6 42.1 28.8 37.6 36.4 39.6 36.4 35.7Progression Factor 0.61 1.27 1.47 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 5.7 2.6 3.0 4.3 2.3 0.7 6.5 0.6 0.3Delay (s) 33.0 38.8 64.8 25.3 39.9 37.2 46.1 37.0 36.0Level of Service C D E C D D D D DApproach Delay (s) 38.0 28.9 38.7 41.4Approach LOS D C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 34.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.2% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200932: Finch Avenue & Duncanwoods Drive

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 32

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 117 16 1118 4 34 27 871 27 16 10 62 100 6 31Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.0 3.4 3.8 3.7 3.0 3.5 3.5 2.9 3.0 3.7 2.7 2.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.88Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1655 3326 1666 3262 1596 1441 1472 1414Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.71 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1655 3326 1666 3262 1227 1441 1095 1414Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 127 17 1215 4 37 29 947 29 17 11 67 109 7 34RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 50 0 0 26 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 144 1219 0 0 66 974 0 17 28 0 109 16 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 35 25 5 19 5 25 35 19 19 35Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 6% 25% 2% 0% 9% 2% 0% 10% 3% 8% 0% 3%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 22.0 52.0 22.0 52.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 22.0 52.0 22.0 52.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.43 0.18 0.43 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 303 1441 305 1414 307 360 274 354v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 c0.37 0.04 0.30 0.02 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.10v/c Ratio 0.48 0.85 0.22 0.69 0.06 0.08 0.40 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 43.8 30.4 41.7 27.5 34.2 34.4 37.5 34.1Progression Factor 1.25 0.51 1.40 0.49 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.4 4.1 1.1 1.9 0.3 0.4 4.3 0.2Delay (s) 58.1 19.6 59.3 15.3 34.6 34.8 41.7 34.4Level of Service E B E B C C D CApproach Delay (s) 23.6 18.1 34.8 39.7Approach LOS C B C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.9% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 81: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200933: Finch Avenue & Pearldale Avenue

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 33

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 105 51 1037 48 145 13 873 21 101 19 32 39 11 51Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.1 3.6 3.5 2.8 2.9 3.7 3.2 3.3 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.88Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1630 3321 1663 3300 1573 1521 1529 1338Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.72 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1630 3321 1663 3300 1181 1521 1159 1338Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 114 55 1127 52 158 14 949 23 110 21 35 42 12 55RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 27 0 0 42 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 169 1176 0 0 172 971 0 110 29 0 42 25 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 37 19 21 19 37 21 21 37Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 10% 7% 2% 2% 8% 9% 5% 0% 0% 3% 10% 9% 16%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 22.0 52.0 22.0 52.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 22.0 52.0 22.0 52.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.43 0.18 0.43 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 299 1439 305 1430 285 368 280 323v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 c0.35 0.10 0.29 0.02 0.02v/s Ratio Perm c0.09 0.04v/c Ratio 0.57 0.82 0.56 0.68 0.39 0.08 0.15 0.08Uniform Delay, d1 44.6 29.8 44.6 27.3 38.1 35.2 35.8 35.2Progression Factor 1.10 0.75 0.45 1.54 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.2 2.9 5.8 2.0 3.9 0.4 1.1 0.5Delay (s) 53.5 25.2 25.8 44.1 42.0 35.6 36.9 35.6Level of Service D C C D D D D DApproach Delay (s) 28.8 41.3 39.8 36.1Approach LOS C D D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 34.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200934: Finch Avenue & Islington Avenue

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 34

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 216 791 39 63 298 921 95 38 499 283 125 781 155Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.7 3.8 3.6 3.7 3.2 3.7 3.4 3.0 4.2 4.1 3.2 3.7 3.6Total Lost time (s) 2.5 7.0 2.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.79 1.00 1.00 0.94Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1562 3453 1638 3325 1613 3667 1275 1497 3510 1415Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 0.34 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1562 3453 1638 3325 253 3667 1275 544 3510 1415Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 235 860 42 68 324 1001 103 41 542 308 136 849 168RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 183 0 0 80Lane Group Flow (vph) 235 899 0 0 392 1098 0 41 542 125 136 849 88Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 97 42 138 42 97 53 138 138 53Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 6% 3% 2% 6% 7% 8% 3% 5% 5% 6% 4% 7%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 32.5 34.0 32.5 34.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0Effective Green, g (s) 32.5 34.0 32.5 34.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.28 0.27 0.28 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31Clearance Time (s) 2.5 7.0 2.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 423 978 444 942 78 1131 393 168 1082 436v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 0.26 c0.24 c0.33 0.15 0.24v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.10 c0.25 0.06v/c Ratio 0.56 0.92 0.88 1.17 0.53 0.48 0.32 0.81 0.78 0.20Uniform Delay, d1 37.6 41.7 41.9 43.0 34.3 33.7 31.8 38.3 37.9 30.6Progression Factor 1.07 0.68 0.82 1.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.0 12.1 19.5 84.6 23.1 1.5 2.1 32.9 5.7 1.0Delay (s) 44.4 40.3 53.8 139.6 57.3 35.1 33.9 71.2 43.6 31.7Level of Service D D D F E D C E D CApproach Delay (s) 41.2 117.1 35.7 45.1Approach LOS D F D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 65.4 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.5% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 82: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200935: Finch Avenue & Kipling Avenue

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 35

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 10 170 578 25 213 508 153 15 434 162 243 752 188Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.6 3.8 3.4 3.0 3.7 2.9 3.0 3.7 3.4 3.3 3.7 3.5Total Lost time (s) 2.5 7.0 2.5 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.84Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1490 3337 1574 3162 1486 3318 1339 1695 3411 1285Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1490 3337 1574 3162 221 3318 1339 688 3411 1285Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 11 185 628 27 232 552 166 16 472 176 264 817 204RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 24 0 0 0 126 0 0 146Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 196 653 0 232 694 0 16 472 50 264 817 58Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 138 7 107 7 107 138 52 52 138Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 8% 9% 16% 7% 8% 8% 13% 10% 10% 2% 7% 5%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 22.5 31.0 22.5 31.0 46.0 34.0 34.0 46.0 34.0 34.0Effective Green, g (s) 22.5 31.0 22.5 31.0 46.0 34.0 34.0 46.0 34.0 34.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.26 0.19 0.26 0.38 0.28 0.28 0.38 0.28 0.28Clearance Time (s) 2.5 7.0 2.5 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 279 862 295 817 211 940 379 364 966 364v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 0.20 c0.15 c0.22 0.01 0.14 c0.07 c0.24v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.04 0.21 0.04v/c Ratio 0.70 0.76 0.79 0.85 0.08 0.50 0.13 0.73 0.85 0.16Uniform Delay, d1 45.6 41.0 46.5 42.3 24.8 35.9 32.0 28.1 40.5 32.3Progression Factor 1.66 0.48 0.47 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 12.7 5.7 2.0 1.1 0.7 1.9 0.7 11.9 9.0 0.9Delay (s) 88.5 25.2 23.9 44.2 25.5 37.8 32.7 40.0 49.6 33.2Level of Service F C C D C D C D D CApproach Delay (s) 39.8 39.3 36.2 45.0Approach LOS D D D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 40.8 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.9% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200936: Finch Avenue & Albion Mall

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 36

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1 0 790 9 16 6 740 0 5 0 17 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3213 1610 3221 1610 1441Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3213 1610 3221 1610 1441Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1 0 859 10 17 7 804 0 5 0 18 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1 868 0 0 24 804 0 5 0 4 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 59 17 17 59 59Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot customProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 71.0 12.0 71.0 25.0 25.0Effective Green, g (s) 12.0 71.0 12.0 71.0 25.0 25.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.59 0.10 0.59 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 161 1901 161 1906 335 300v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.27 c0.01 0.25 c0.00v/s Ratio Perm 0.00v/c Ratio 0.01 0.46 0.15 0.42 0.01 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 48.6 13.7 49.3 13.3 37.7 37.7Progression Factor 1.04 1.28 0.79 1.30 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.6 1.4 0.5 0.1 0.1Delay (s) 50.8 18.2 40.4 17.8 37.8 37.8Level of Service D B D B D DApproach Delay (s) 18.2 18.5 37.8 0.0Approach LOS B B D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.32Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 83: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200937: Albion Road & Finch Avenue

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 37

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 7 526 207 32 524 229 89 272 616 16 128 449 17Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.4 3.5 3.3 2.6 3.7 4.2 3.7 3.0 3.5 3.1 2.7 3.7 3.4Total Lost time (s) 2.5 7.0 7.0 2.5 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1372 3368 1487 1514 3476 1625 1593 3341 1490 3489Flt Permitted 0.31 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 443 3368 1487 486 3476 1625 1593 3341 1490 3489Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 8 572 225 35 570 249 97 296 670 17 139 488 18RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 161 0 0 178 0 0 1 0 0 2 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 8 572 64 35 570 71 0 393 686 0 139 504 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 14% 6% 5% 6% 5% 6% 2% 7% 6% 25% 9% 4% 6%Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot ProtProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 39.5 34.0 34.0 39.5 34.0 34.0 26.0 34.0 26.0 34.0Effective Green, g (s) 39.5 34.0 34.0 39.5 34.0 34.0 26.0 34.0 26.0 34.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.28 0.28 0.33 0.28 0.28 0.22 0.28 0.22 0.28Clearance Time (s) 2.5 7.0 7.0 2.5 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 188 954 421 207 985 460 345 947 323 989v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.17 c0.01 0.16 c0.25 c0.21 0.09 0.14v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.04v/c Ratio 0.04 0.60 0.15 0.17 0.58 0.15 1.14 0.72 0.43 0.51Uniform Delay, d1 27.6 37.1 32.2 28.1 36.9 32.2 47.0 38.8 40.6 36.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.37 1.17 0.84Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 2.8 0.8 1.8 2.5 0.7 86.4 3.7 3.8 1.7Delay (s) 28.0 39.9 33.0 29.9 39.3 32.9 133.2 56.9 51.5 32.0Level of Service C D C C D C F E D CApproach Delay (s) 37.8 37.1 84.6 36.2Approach LOS D D F D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 52.3 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200938: Finch Avenue & Martin Grove Road

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 38

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 124 67 590 100 140 105 476 7 76 254 122 15 538 89Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 2.8 3.1 3.7 2.8 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1501 3261 1560 3122 1422 3292 1178 1518 3405Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 0.57 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1501 3261 1560 3122 422 3292 1178 918 3405Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 135 73 641 109 152 114 517 8 83 276 133 16 585 97RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 83 0 11 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 208 738 0 0 266 524 0 83 276 50 16 671 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 62 46 54 72 54 46 62 72 72 62Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 16% 8% 9% 2% 10% 9% 0% 13% 6% 17% 7% 4% 12%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 28.5 32.0 28.5 32.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0Effective Green, g (s) 28.5 32.0 28.5 32.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.27 0.24 0.27 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38Clearance Time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 356 870 371 833 158 1235 442 344 1277v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.23 c0.17 0.17 0.08 c0.20v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.04 0.02v/c Ratio 0.58 0.85 0.72 0.63 0.53 0.22 0.11 0.05 0.53Uniform Delay, d1 40.5 41.7 42.0 38.8 29.2 25.6 24.5 23.9 29.2Progression Factor 1.23 0.56 1.22 1.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 6.6 9.7 9.8 3.1 11.9 0.4 0.5 0.3 1.5Delay (s) 56.6 32.9 60.9 63.2 41.1 26.0 25.0 24.1 30.7Level of Service E C E E D C C C CApproach Delay (s) 38.1 62.4 28.3 30.6Approach LOS D E C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 41.2 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.9% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 84: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200939: Finch Avenue & Silverstone Drive

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 39

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 35 666 22 65 504 47 28 36 89 40 67 34Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.8 3.8 3.7 2.9 3.8 3.7 3.1 3.1 3.7 3.2 3.3 3.7Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.95Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1551 3369 1541 3327 1445 1468 1597 1615Flt Permitted 0.39 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.66 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 637 3369 514 3327 1043 1468 1116 1615Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 38 724 24 71 548 51 30 39 97 43 73 37RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 63 0 0 15 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 38 746 0 71 593 0 30 73 0 43 95 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 9% 9% 8% 9% 15% 18% 17% 6% 8% 9% 6%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0Effective Green, g (s) 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 350 1853 283 1830 365 514 391 565v/s Ratio Prot c0.22 0.18 0.05 c0.06v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.14 0.03 0.04v/c Ratio 0.11 0.40 0.25 0.32 0.08 0.14 0.11 0.17Uniform Delay, d1 12.9 15.6 14.1 14.8 26.1 26.7 26.4 26.9Progression Factor 0.31 0.29 2.03 2.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.5 1.7 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6Delay (s) 4.5 5.0 30.3 30.9 26.5 27.3 26.9 27.6Level of Service A A C C C C C CApproach Delay (s) 5.0 30.8 27.1 27.4Approach LOS A C C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.7 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.31Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200940: Finch Avenue & Westmore Drive

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 40

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 113 673 32 192 59 618 42 19 33 34 60 43 48Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.6 4.0 2.4 3.7 3.2 3.8 3.7 2.7 2.7 3.7 3.2 4.6 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1558 3510 1687 3430 1624 1533 1675 1885Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.71 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1558 3510 1687 3430 1185 1533 1251 1885Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 123 732 35 209 64 672 46 21 36 37 65 47 52RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 27 0 0 33 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 123 764 0 0 273 714 0 21 46 0 65 66 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 7% 0% 2% 3% 7% 0% 0% 0% 6% 3% 0% 6%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 34.5 40.0 34.5 40.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0Effective Green, g (s) 34.5 40.0 34.5 40.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.33 0.29 0.33 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26Clearance Time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 448 1170 485 1143 306 396 323 487v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.22 c0.16 0.21 0.03 0.03v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.05v/c Ratio 0.27 0.65 0.56 0.62 0.07 0.12 0.20 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 33.1 34.1 36.3 33.7 33.6 34.0 34.8 34.2Progression Factor 1.54 0.78 0.92 1.46 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 2.5 4.6 2.6 0.4 0.6 1.4 0.6Delay (s) 52.4 29.3 38.2 51.6 34.0 34.6 36.2 34.8Level of Service D C D D C C D CApproach Delay (s) 32.5 47.9 34.5 35.3Approach LOS C D C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 39.9 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.9% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 85: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200941: Finch Avenue & Highway 27

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 41

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 93 446 59 214 590 28 152 616 200 97 952 94Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.9 3.7 3.7 3.1 4.0 3.7 3.1 3.6 3.9 3.1 3.8 3.4Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1541 3349 1289 1564 5209 1491 1509 4621 1655 4874Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.17 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1541 3349 1289 1564 5209 1491 192 4621 290 4874Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 101 485 64 233 641 30 165 670 217 105 1035 102RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 45 0 0 25 0 49 0 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 101 485 19 233 641 6 165 838 0 105 1128 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 9 9 7 5 2 2 5Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 9% 24% 9% 4% 7% 13% 8% 7% 3% 6% 19%Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm pm+pt pm+ptProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 47.0 33.0 47.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 47.0 33.0 47.0 33.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.39 0.28 0.39 0.28Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 449 977 376 287 955 273 229 1271 273 1340v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.14 c0.15 0.12 c0.08 0.18 0.04 c0.23v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.00 0.20 0.11v/c Ratio 0.22 0.50 0.05 0.81 0.67 0.02 0.72 0.66 0.38 0.84Uniform Delay, d1 32.2 35.2 30.5 47.0 45.6 40.2 27.8 38.5 24.9 41.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.26 2.24 1.89 0.19 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 1.8 0.2 19.6 3.4 0.1 10.5 1.5 4.1 6.5Delay (s) 33.4 37.0 30.8 78.3 60.7 89.9 63.0 8.7 29.0 47.6Level of Service C D C E E F E A C DApproach Delay (s) 35.8 66.2 17.2 46.0Approach LOS D E B D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 41.2 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.9% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200942: Humber College Blvd & Highway 27

Future AM peak Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 42

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 66 221 284 152 233 64 354 703 238 62 1106 226Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3276 1789 3462 1789 3579 1601 1789 3579 1601Flt Permitted 0.48 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 909 3276 560 3462 1789 3579 1601 0 3579 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 72 240 309 165 253 70 385 764 259 67 1202 246RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 193 0 0 21 0 0 0 121 0 0 141Lane Group Flow (vph) 72 356 0 165 302 0 385 764 138 67 1202 105Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt custom pm+ov pm+pt customProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 9 9 3 1 6 7Permitted Phases 4 8 9 9 6 4Actuated Green, G (s) 40.0 36.0 40.0 36.0 24.0 24.0 28.0 40.0 40.0 40.0Effective Green, g (s) 40.0 36.0 40.0 36.0 24.0 24.0 28.0 40.0 40.0 40.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.30 0.33 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.23 0.33 0.33 0.33Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 332 983 228 1039 358 716 374 596 1193 587v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.11 c0.02 0.09 c0.22 0.21 0.01 0.04 c0.34 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.22 0.07 0.06v/c Ratio 0.22 0.36 0.72 0.29 1.08 1.07 0.37 0.11 1.01 0.18Uniform Delay, d1 27.9 33.0 36.2 32.2 48.0 48.0 38.6 27.7 40.0 28.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.66 1.44 0.41Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 1.0 18.1 0.7 69.1 53.0 2.8 0.3 23.5 0.5Delay (s) 29.4 34.0 54.2 32.9 117.1 101.0 41.4 46.3 81.2 12.0Level of Service C C D C F F D D F BApproach Delay (s) 33.5 40.1 94.4 68.4Approach LOS C D F E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 68.7 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.2% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 86: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20091: Finch Avenue & Yonge Street

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 1

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 58 182 778 226 85 538 138 185 1775 147 93 875 118Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.8 3.6 2.9 3.6 3.1 4.0 2.8 3.5 3.7 3.2 3.6 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1430 2853 1425 2668 1476 4325 1522 4369Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.10 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1430 2853 1425 2668 199 4325 153 4369Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 63 198 846 246 92 585 150 201 1929 160 101 951 128RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 21 0 0 17 0 0 7 0 0 14 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 261 1071 0 92 718 0 201 2082 0 101 1065 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 221 146 146 221 182 415 415 182Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 4% 6% 4% 14% 6% 3% 0% 2% 9% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot pm+pt pm+ptProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 22.0 33.0 22.0 33.0 59.0 42.0 59.0 42.0Effective Green, g (s) 22.0 33.0 22.0 33.0 59.0 42.0 59.0 42.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.25 0.17 0.25 0.45 0.32 0.45 0.32Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 242 724 241 677 257 1397 248 1412v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 c0.38 0.06 0.27 c0.10 c0.48 0.05 0.24v/s Ratio Perm 0.25 0.13v/c Ratio 1.08 1.48 0.38 1.06 0.78 1.49 0.41 0.75Uniform Delay, d1 54.0 48.5 48.0 48.5 26.2 44.0 26.7 39.4Progression Factor 1.37 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 71.9 221.2 4.5 51.7 20.7 224.4 4.9 3.8Delay (s) 145.9 269.0 52.5 100.2 46.9 268.4 31.6 43.2Level of Service F F D F D F C DApproach Delay (s) 245.2 94.9 248.9 42.2Approach LOS F F F D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 182.3 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.30Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.2% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20092: Finch Avenue & Greenview

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 2

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 171 20 1180 44 90 34 875 26 60 2 31 13 6 16Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.89Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1793 3554 1784 3528 1769 2961 1661 3211Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.73 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1793 3554 1784 3528 1379 2961 1280 3211Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 186 22 1283 48 98 37 951 28 65 2 34 14 7 17RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 28 0 0 13 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 208 1329 0 0 135 978 0 65 8 0 14 11 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 45 25 25 45 8 12 12 8Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 2% 0% 2% 3% 3% 0% 2% 0% 3% 8% 0% 0%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 68.0 20.0 68.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 68.0 20.0 68.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.52 0.15 0.52 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 276 1859 274 1845 318 683 295 741v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.37 0.08 0.28 0.00 0.00v/s Ratio Perm c0.05 0.01v/c Ratio 0.75 0.71 0.49 0.53 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 52.6 23.6 50.4 20.5 40.4 38.6 38.9 38.6Progression Factor 0.53 1.74 1.08 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 15.6 2.1 3.2 0.6 1.4 0.0 0.3 0.0Delay (s) 43.4 43.3 57.6 13.4 41.8 38.6 39.2 38.6Level of Service D D E B D D D DApproach Delay (s) 43.3 18.8 40.7 38.8Approach LOS D B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 33.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.6% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 87: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20093: Finch Avenue & Talbot Road

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 3

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 141 283 935 5 44 0 899 233 12 1 9 7 106 2Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.9 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.0 3.3 2.9 3.7 4.8 3.7 3.5 2.7 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.94 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1632 3396 1652 3087 1215 1688 1704Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.82 0.74 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1632 3396 1652 3087 1026 1318 1704Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 153 308 1016 5 48 0 977 253 13 1 10 8 115 2RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 9 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 461 1021 0 0 48 1212 0 0 15 0 8 116 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 66 29 23 29 66 25 23 23 25Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 0% 2% 0% 4% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 43.0 54.0 43.0 54.0 17.0 17.0 17.0Effective Green, g (s) 43.0 54.0 43.0 54.0 17.0 17.0 17.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.42 0.33 0.42 0.13 0.13 0.13Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 540 1411 546 1282 134 172 223v/s Ratio Prot c0.28 0.30 0.03 c0.39 c0.07v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.01v/c Ratio 0.85 0.72 0.09 0.95 0.11 0.05 0.52Uniform Delay, d1 40.6 31.8 30.0 36.6 49.9 49.4 52.7Progression Factor 0.64 1.00 1.09 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 12.4 2.5 0.3 13.6 1.7 0.5 8.4Delay (s) 38.5 34.4 33.1 40.7 51.6 49.9 61.1Level of Service D C C D D D EApproach Delay (s) 35.6 40.4 51.6 60.4Approach LOS D D D E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 38.9 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.4% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20094: Finch Avenue & Edithvale

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 4

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1257 19 65 1090 44 96Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3570 1789 3579 1789 1601Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3570 1789 3579 1789 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1366 21 71 1185 48 104RTOR Reduction (vph) 1 0 0 0 0 79Lane Group Flow (vph) 1386 0 71 1185 48 25Turn Type Prot PermProtected Phases 4 3 8 2Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 74.0 13.0 91.0 31.0 31.0Effective Green, g (s) 74.0 13.0 91.0 31.0 31.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.10 0.70 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2032 179 2505 427 382v/s Ratio Prot c0.39 0.04 c0.33 c0.03v/s Ratio Perm 0.02v/c Ratio 0.68 0.40 0.47 0.11 0.06Uniform Delay, d1 19.7 54.8 8.7 38.7 38.3Progression Factor 2.13 0.62 2.41 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 3.3 0.3 0.5 0.3Delay (s) 42.1 37.3 21.4 39.3 38.6Level of Service D D C D DApproach Delay (s) 42.1 22.3 38.8Approach LOS D C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 33.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 88: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20095: Finch Avenue & Senlac Road

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 5

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 1016 220 151 149 1015 0 409 0 167 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 7.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3259 1807 3444 1664 1561Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.76 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3259 1807 3444 1326 1561Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1104 239 164 162 1103 0 445 0 182 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1329 0 0 326 1103 0 445 139 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 36 10 36 47 10 10 47Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 8% 1% 2% 0% 6% 0% 3% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 48.0 22.0 74.0 43.0 43.0Effective Green, g (s) 48.0 22.0 74.0 43.0 43.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.17 0.57 0.33 0.33Clearance Time (s) 7.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1203 306 1960 439 516v/s Ratio Prot c0.41 c0.18 0.32 0.09v/s Ratio Perm c0.34v/c Ratio 1.10 1.07 0.56 1.01 0.27Uniform Delay, d1 41.0 54.0 17.7 43.5 31.9Progression Factor 0.57 0.56 0.80 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 58.8 68.1 1.1 46.4 1.3Delay (s) 82.3 98.4 15.4 89.9 33.2Level of Service F F B F CApproach Delay (s) 82.3 34.3 73.5 0.0Approach LOS F C E A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 60.5 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.8% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20096: Finch & Grantbrook

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 6

Movement EBU EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 184 133 1155 1030 376 46 64Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 3579 3444 1738 1588Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1810 3579 3444 1738 1588Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 200 145 1255 1120 409 50 70RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 28 0 0 58Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 345 1255 1501 0 50 12Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 2% 2% 1% 5% 2%Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 2Turn Type Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 8 6Permitted Phases 6Actuated Green, G (s) 32.0 99.0 63.0 23.0 23.0Effective Green, g (s) 32.0 99.0 63.0 23.0 23.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.76 0.48 0.18 0.18Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 446 2726 1669 307 281v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 0.35 c0.44 c0.03v/s Ratio Perm 0.01v/c Ratio 0.77 0.46 0.90 0.16 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 45.6 5.7 30.6 45.3 44.4Progression Factor 1.37 0.44 0.38 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 9.2 0.4 6.0 1.1 0.3Delay (s) 71.7 2.9 17.7 46.5 44.7Level of Service E A B D DApproach Delay (s) 17.7 17.7 45.4Approach LOS B B D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.8 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.0% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 89: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20097: Finch & Finchurst

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 7

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 116 0 1320 10 105 10 1075 0 10 0 10 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3574 1789 3579 1789 1601Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1789 3574 1789 3579 1789 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 126 0 1435 11 114 11 1168 0 11 0 11 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 126 1446 0 0 125 1168 0 11 0 2 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot customProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 73.0 19.0 73.0 26.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 19.0 73.0 19.0 73.0 26.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.56 0.15 0.56 0.20 0.20Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 261 2007 261 2010 358 320v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 c0.40 0.07 0.33 c0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.00v/c Ratio 0.48 0.72 0.48 0.58 0.03 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 51.0 21.0 51.0 18.5 41.9 41.7Progression Factor 0.56 2.56 1.09 0.84 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.2 3.1 0.6 0.2 0.0Delay (s) 29.4 53.8 58.7 16.2 42.0 41.7Level of Service C D E B D DApproach Delay (s) 51.9 20.3 41.9 0.0Approach LOS D C D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 37.6 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20098: Finch Avenue & Bathurst Street

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 8

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 104 346 1190 105 100 165 872 115 129 1311 111 77 988 347Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.5 3.5 2.9 3.7 3.0 3.9 3.6 3.0 3.5 3.2 3.0 4.0 2.9Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 0.91Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1519 3248 1652 3520 1668 3433 1164 1636 3625 1325Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1519 3248 1652 3520 185 3433 1164 181 3625 1325Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 113 376 1293 114 109 179 948 125 140 1425 121 84 1074 377RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 35 0 0 110Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 489 1402 0 0 288 1065 0 140 1425 86 84 1074 267Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 80 64 285 183 285 64 80 183 183 80Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 5% 6% 4% 2% 2% 3% 4% 1% 4% 2% 3% 4% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 33.0 35.0 33.0 35.0 46.0 38.0 38.0 46.0 38.0 38.0Effective Green, g (s) 33.0 35.0 33.0 35.0 46.0 38.0 38.0 46.0 38.0 38.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.27 0.25 0.27 0.35 0.29 0.29 0.35 0.29 0.29Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 386 874 419 948 157 1003 340 154 1060 387v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 c0.43 0.17 0.30 c0.05 c0.42 0.03 0.30v/s Ratio Perm 0.26 0.07 0.16 0.20v/c Ratio 1.27 1.60 0.69 1.12 0.89 1.42 0.25 0.55 1.01 0.69Uniform Delay, d1 48.5 47.5 43.8 47.5 34.5 46.0 35.2 33.3 46.0 40.8Progression Factor 1.29 1.11 1.23 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 129.1 274.2 7.6 67.6 47.7 195.2 1.8 13.2 31.0 9.6Delay (s) 191.6 327.0 61.4 114.7 82.2 241.2 37.0 46.5 77.0 50.4Level of Service F F E F F F D D E DApproach Delay (s) 292.1 103.4 213.3 68.8Approach LOS F F F E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 179.0 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.40Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.1% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 90: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 20099: Finch Avenue & Virgilwood Drive

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 9

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 62 60 1546 77 133 23 1424 27 58 3 94 25 0 31Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.1 3.9 3.4 3.7 3.1 3.7 3.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 3.7 4.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1647 3560 1676 3499 1786 1869Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.86 0.84Satd. Flow (perm) 1647 3560 1676 3499 1558 1613Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 67 65 1680 84 145 25 1548 29 63 3 102 27 0 34RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 38 0 0 26 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 132 1761 0 0 170 1576 0 0 130 0 0 35 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 30 33 9 31 9 33 30 31 31 30Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 5% 4% 0% 2% 0% 4% 0% 3% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 16.5 69.0 16.5 69.0 30.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 16.5 69.0 16.5 69.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.53 0.13 0.53 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 209 1890 213 1857 360 372v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.49 c0.10 0.45v/s Ratio Perm c0.08 0.02v/c Ratio 0.63 0.93 0.80 0.85 0.36 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 53.9 28.3 55.1 26.0 41.9 39.3Progression Factor 1.11 0.66 0.84 1.42 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 5.5 4.4 11.0 1.9 2.8 0.5Delay (s) 65.5 23.0 57.1 38.9 44.7 39.8Level of Service E C E D D DApproach Delay (s) 25.9 40.7 44.7 39.8Approach LOS C D D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 33.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200910: Finch Avenue & Torresdale Avenue

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 10

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 54 174 1463 110 58 80 1125 64 38 4 39 64 3 31Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.0 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.0 3.6 2.8 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.93 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.86Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1639 3433 1546 3282 1513 1461 1606 1485Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.73 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1639 3433 1546 3282 1168 1461 1229 1485Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 59 189 1590 120 63 87 1223 70 41 4 42 70 3 34RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 32 0 0 26 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 248 1706 0 0 150 1290 0 41 14 0 70 11 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 55 22 41 26 41 22 55 26 55 26Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 3% 5% 17% 2% 14% 9% 6% 5% 0% 7% 6% 0% 5%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 24.5 61.0 24.5 61.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 24.5 61.0 24.5 61.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.47 0.19 0.47 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 309 1611 291 1540 270 337 284 343v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 c0.50 0.10 0.39 0.01 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 c0.06v/c Ratio 0.80 1.06 0.52 0.84 0.15 0.04 0.25 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 50.4 34.5 47.4 30.2 39.9 38.8 40.8 38.7Progression Factor 0.94 0.98 1.35 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 28.2 3.6 3.2 1.2 0.2 2.1 0.2Delay (s) 49.6 62.0 67.8 20.3 41.0 39.1 42.8 38.9Level of Service D E E C D D D DApproach Delay (s) 60.4 25.2 40.0 41.5Approach LOS E C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 45.2 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.2% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 91: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200911: Finch Avenue & Wilmington Avenue

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 11

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 18 0 1290 149 87 183 965 0 208 0 421 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.7 4.0 2.8 3.7 2.8 4.2 3.7 2.7 3.7 2.8 3.7 3.7 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3472 1623 3703 1577 1406Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1789 3472 1623 3703 1577 1406Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 20 0 1402 162 95 199 1049 0 226 0 458 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 20 1557 0 0 294 1049 0 226 0 378 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 49 33 3 33 49 3 3 49Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 6% 4% 2% 1% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot customProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 5.5 56.0 24.5 75.0 34.0 34.0Effective Green, g (s) 5.5 56.0 24.5 75.0 34.0 34.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.43 0.19 0.58 0.26 0.26Clearance Time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 76 1496 306 2136 412 368v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.45 c0.18 0.28 0.14v/s Ratio Perm c0.27v/c Ratio 0.26 1.04 0.96 0.49 0.55 1.03Uniform Delay, d1 60.3 37.0 52.3 16.2 41.4 48.0Progression Factor 0.98 1.00 0.78 0.70 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 20.8 30.5 0.5 5.2 53.7Delay (s) 59.9 57.8 71.4 11.8 46.6 101.7Level of Service E E E B D FApproach Delay (s) 57.9 24.8 83.5 0.0Approach LOS E C F A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 50.4 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.2% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200912: Finch Avenue & Dufferin Street

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 12

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 80 73 699 347 100 192 602 173 219 1168 352 263 1166 42Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.7 2.5 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.4 3.9 2.9 3.9 3.4Total Lost time (s) 2.5 7.0 2.5 7.0 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1532 3049 1534 3289 1600 4660 1600 5050Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.12 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1532 3049 1534 3289 198 4660 198 5050Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 87 79 760 377 109 209 654 188 238 1270 383 286 1267 46RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 47 0 0 0 21 0 0 42 0 0 3 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 166 1090 0 0 318 821 0 238 1611 0 286 1310 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 76 85 67 39 67 85 76 39 39 76Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 16% 5% 13% 2% 4% 3% 2% 4% 3% 6% 4% 5% 11%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+pt pm+ptProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 24.5 40.0 25.5 41.0 46.5 34.0 46.5 34.0Effective Green, g (s) 24.5 40.0 25.5 41.0 46.5 34.0 46.5 34.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.31 0.20 0.32 0.36 0.26 0.36 0.26Clearance Time (s) 2.5 7.0 2.5 7.0 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 289 938 301 1037 206 1219 206 1321v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.36 c0.21 0.25 0.11 0.35 c0.13 0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.30 c0.36v/c Ratio 0.57 1.16 1.06 0.79 1.16 1.32 1.39 0.99Uniform Delay, d1 48.0 45.0 52.2 40.6 35.6 48.0 35.7 47.9Progression Factor 1.13 1.34 0.98 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 74.1 64.3 5.5 110.9 150.5 201.8 22.9Delay (s) 54.8 134.2 115.6 32.0 146.4 198.5 237.5 70.7Level of Service D F F C F F F EApproach Delay (s) 124.1 54.9 192.0 100.6Approach LOS F D F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 125.9 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.19Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 111.5% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 92: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200913: Finch Avenue & Alness Street

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 13

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 172 345 1405 76 168 74 1032 185 71 158 66 262 187 112Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.0 3.5 3.6 3.7 2.8 3.5 3.3 4.2 4.2 3.7 4.4 4.4 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.93Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1641 3336 1593 3281 1716 1842 1413 1806 1952 1418Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.51 1.00 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1641 3336 1593 3281 922 1842 1413 1086 1952 1418Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 187 375 1527 83 183 80 1122 201 77 172 72 285 203 122RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 3 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 55 0 0 94Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 562 1607 0 0 263 1312 0 77 172 17 285 203 28Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 46 26 25 49 25 26 46 49 49 46Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 3% 6% 0% 2% 6% 6% 2% 10% 10% 7% 6% 6% 7%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 31.0 44.0 31.0 44.0 34.0 30.0 30.0 34.0 30.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 31.0 44.0 31.0 44.0 34.0 30.0 30.0 34.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.34 0.24 0.34 0.26 0.23 0.23 0.26 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 391 1129 380 1110 266 425 326 306 450 327v/s Ratio Prot c0.34 c0.48 0.17 0.40 0.01 0.09 c0.03 0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.01 c0.21 0.02v/c Ratio 1.44 1.42 0.69 1.18 0.29 0.40 0.05 0.93 0.45 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 49.5 43.0 45.1 43.0 37.8 42.4 38.9 47.2 42.9 39.2Progression Factor 1.22 0.64 1.09 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 210.5 195.5 8.4 89.8 2.7 2.8 0.3 36.6 3.2 0.5Delay (s) 271.1 223.0 57.5 133.4 40.5 45.3 39.2 83.8 46.2 39.8Level of Service F F E F D D D F D DApproach Delay (s) 235.4 120.8 42.8 62.5Approach LOS F F D E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 161.0 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.24Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 120.5% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200914: Finch Avenue & Chesswood Drive

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 14

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 196 8 1160 182 238 152 1258 11 337 3 97 8 2 11Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.3 3.4 3.7 3.7 3.0 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1654 3233 1615 3340 965 810 1664 1463Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.69 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1654 3233 1615 3340 760 810 1204 1463Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 213 9 1261 198 259 165 1367 12 366 3 105 9 2 12RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 26 0 0 8 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 222 1449 0 0 424 1378 0 366 83 0 9 6 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 59 6 36 11 36 6 59 11 11 59Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 88% 5% 9% 2% 8% 8% 0% 73% 9% 100% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 24.0 44.0 24.0 44.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0Effective Green, g (s) 24.0 44.0 24.0 44.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.34 0.18 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35Clearance Time (s) 4.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 305 1094 298 1130 263 280 417 506v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.45 c0.26 0.41 0.10 0.00v/s Ratio Perm c0.48 0.01v/c Ratio 0.73 1.32 1.42 1.22 1.39 0.29 0.02 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 49.9 43.0 53.0 43.0 42.5 30.9 28.0 27.9Progression Factor 0.64 1.30 0.65 1.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 9.6 150.3 206.5 106.1 197.9 2.7 0.1 0.0Delay (s) 41.5 206.3 240.8 160.7 240.4 33.6 28.1 27.9Level of Service D F F F F C C CApproach Delay (s) 184.6 179.5 193.3 28.0Approach LOS F F F C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 182.4 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.37Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.4% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 93: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200915: Finch Avenue & Driveway

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 5 1516 7 6 1513 0 3 0 9 5 0 5Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.93Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3576 1789 3579 1669 1713Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.94Satd. Flow (perm) 1789 3576 1789 3579 1645 1649Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 5 1648 8 7 1645 0 3 0 10 5 0 5RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 1656 0 7 1645 0 0 6 0 0 6 0Turn Type Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 80.0 4.0 80.0 34.0 34.0Effective Green, g (s) 4.0 80.0 4.0 80.0 34.0 34.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.62 0.03 0.62 0.26 0.26Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 55 2201 55 2202 430 431v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.46 c0.00 0.46v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 c0.00v/c Ratio 0.09 0.75 0.13 0.75 0.01 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 61.2 17.9 61.3 17.8 35.6 35.6Progression Factor 0.89 0.75 1.35 0.76 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1Delay (s) 55.9 14.7 83.4 13.7 35.6 35.6Level of Service E B F B D DApproach Delay (s) 14.9 14.0 35.6 35.6Approach LOS B B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200916: Finch Avenue & Alexdon

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 16

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 183 5 1490 31 99 119 1610 1 26 0 182 1 0 2Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.91Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3561 1789 3578 1756 1601 1652Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 1789 3561 1789 3578 1397 1601 1603Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 199 5 1620 34 108 129 1750 1 28 0 198 1 0 2RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 0 2 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 204 1653 0 0 237 1751 0 28 116 0 0 1 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 10 20 20 10 13 13Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 23.0 67.0 23.0 67.0 28.0 28.0 28.0Effective Green, g (s) 23.0 67.0 23.0 67.0 28.0 28.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.52 0.18 0.52 0.22 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 317 1835 317 1844 301 345 345v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 0.46 c0.13 c0.49 c0.07v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.00v/c Ratio 0.64 0.90 0.75 0.95 0.09 0.34 0.00Uniform Delay, d1 49.7 28.5 50.7 29.9 40.8 43.2 40.1Progression Factor 1.14 0.84 1.31 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 8.9 7.0 12.0 10.0 0.6 2.6 0.0Delay (s) 65.5 30.9 78.6 19.8 41.4 45.8 40.1Level of Service E C E B D D DApproach Delay (s) 34.7 26.8 45.2 40.1Approach LOS C C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 31.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.3% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 94: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200917: Finch Avenue & Tangiers Road

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 36 1081 50 45 1298 53 119 37 55 148 41 37Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.0 3.9 3.7 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.7 2.8 3.6 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.93Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 3436 1616 3301 1478 1549 1558 3154Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.69 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1685 3436 1616 3301 1088 1549 1136 3154Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 39 1175 54 49 1411 58 129 40 60 161 45 40RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 42 0 0 29 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 39 1226 0 49 1467 0 129 58 0 161 56 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 28 12 12 28Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 8% 2% 8% 9% 2% 10% 0% 4% 4% 0% 9%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 75.0 4.0 75.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0Effective Green, g (s) 4.0 75.0 4.0 75.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.58 0.03 0.58 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 52 1982 50 1904 293 417 306 849v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.36 c0.03 c0.44 0.04 0.02v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 c0.14v/c Ratio 0.75 0.62 0.98 0.77 0.44 0.14 0.53 0.07Uniform Delay, d1 62.5 18.1 63.0 20.9 39.4 36.1 40.4 35.3Progression Factor 1.01 0.70 1.07 0.64 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 8.7 0.1 75.7 1.3 4.7 0.7 6.3 0.1Delay (s) 71.6 12.8 143.3 14.6 44.1 36.8 46.8 35.5Level of Service E B F B D D D DApproach Delay (s) 14.6 18.7 40.9 42.9Approach LOS B B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.9% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200918: Finch Avenue & Keele Street

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 18

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 66 114 1090 216 288 171 843 226 207 847 183 249 962 54Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.1 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.0 3.3 2.6 3.0 3.6 3.2 3.0 3.2 2.6Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.66Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1592 3143 1582 2962 1532 3343 1261 1518 3165 848Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1592 3143 1582 2962 195 3343 1261 194 3165 848Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 72 124 1185 235 313 186 916 246 225 921 199 271 1046 59RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 13 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 5 0 0 19Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 196 1407 0 0 499 1143 0 225 921 194 271 1046 40Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 418 199 212 111 212 199 418 111 111 418Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 10% 7% 18% 2% 14% 10% 9% 10% 8% 3% 11% 9% 11%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 25.0 46.0 25.0 46.0 43.0 33.0 33.0 43.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 25.0 46.0 25.0 46.0 43.0 33.0 33.0 43.0 33.0 33.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.35 0.19 0.35 0.33 0.25 0.25 0.33 0.25 0.25Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 306 1112 304 1048 167 849 320 166 803 215v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.45 c0.32 0.39 0.10 0.28 c0.13 0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.34 0.15 c0.42 0.05v/c Ratio 0.64 1.27 1.64 1.09 1.35 1.08 0.61 1.63 1.30 0.19Uniform Delay, d1 48.4 42.0 52.5 42.0 37.6 48.5 42.8 37.7 48.5 38.0Progression Factor 1.36 0.81 1.32 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 8.9 126.0 299.1 52.4 190.6 56.5 8.3 310.3 145.2 1.9Delay (s) 74.7 160.0 368.5 93.7 228.2 105.0 51.0 348.0 193.7 39.9Level of Service E F F F F F D F F DApproach Delay (s) 149.7 176.2 117.6 217.5Approach LOS F F F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 165.4 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.49Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 115.1% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 95: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200919: Finch Avenue & Romfield Lane

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1 1167 14 15 1509 0 1 0 2 6 0 16Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.5 3.5 2.9 3.7 3.7 2.6 3.7 4.8 3.7 3.7 4.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.90Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1716 3273 1825 3349 1657 1867Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 0.94Satd. Flow (perm) 1716 3273 1825 3349 1613 1789Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1 1268 15 16 1640 0 1 0 2 7 0 17RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 14 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 1282 0 16 1640 0 0 1 0 0 10 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 9% 0% 0% 9% 43% 17% 0% 16% 0% 0% 4%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 6 2Permitted Phases 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 5.0 85.0 5.0 85.0 24.0 24.0Effective Green, g (s) 5.0 85.0 5.0 85.0 24.0 24.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.65 0.04 0.65 0.18 0.18Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 66 2140 70 2190 298 330v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.39 c0.01 c0.49v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 c0.01v/c Ratio 0.02 0.60 0.23 0.75 0.00 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 60.1 12.8 60.6 15.3 43.3 43.5Progression Factor 0.64 1.86 0.89 0.77 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.6 4.1 1.3 0.0 0.2Delay (s) 38.9 24.5 57.9 13.0 43.3 43.6Level of Service D C E B D DApproach Delay (s) 24.5 13.5 43.3 43.6Approach LOS C B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.0% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200920: Finch Avenue & Sentinel Road

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 20

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 86 129 933 112 108 95 1039 99 153 317 58 138 226 96Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.8 3.4 3.2 3.7 2.9 3.4 2.9 3.6 4.0 2.4 3.5 4.0 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.94 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1612 3159 1632 3105 1635 3514 1419 3337Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.44 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1612 3159 1632 3105 847 3514 655 3337Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 93 140 1014 122 117 103 1129 108 166 345 63 150 246 104RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 0 5 0 0 11 0 0 26 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 233 1129 0 0 220 1232 0 166 397 0 150 324 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 98 107 122 90 122 107 98 90 90 98Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 8% 7% 2% 2% 12% 4% 2% 3% 1% 18% 5% 3%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 22.0 53.0 22.0 53.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Effective Green, g (s) 22.0 53.0 22.0 53.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.41 0.17 0.41 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 273 1288 276 1266 248 1027 191 975v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.36 0.13 c0.40 0.11 0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 c0.23v/c Ratio 0.85 0.88 0.80 0.97 0.67 0.39 0.79 0.33Uniform Delay, d1 52.4 35.5 51.9 37.8 40.5 36.7 42.3 36.1Progression Factor 1.15 0.48 1.14 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 25.2 7.9 14.3 14.9 13.5 1.1 27.0 0.9Delay (s) 85.4 25.0 73.5 60.1 53.9 37.8 69.2 37.0Level of Service F C E E D D E DApproach Delay (s) 35.3 62.1 42.5 46.6Approach LOS D E D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 47.8 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.1% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 96: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200921: Finch Avenue & Tobermory Drive

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 21

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 55 44 1027 0 72 0 1499 58 0 0 0 50 0 33Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.5 3.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.1 3.5 3.7 4.8 3.7 4.8 4.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1567 3240 1771 3260 1811Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.82Satd. Flow (perm) 1567 3240 391 3260 1522Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 60 48 1116 0 78 0 1629 63 0 0 0 54 0 36RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 108 1116 0 0 78 1690 0 0 0 0 0 72 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 44 22 40 22 44 40 40 44Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 4% 0% 2% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 7.0 86.0 86.0 86.0 21.0Effective Green, g (s) 7.0 86.0 86.0 86.0 21.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.16Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 84 2143 259 2157 246v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.34 c0.52v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 c0.05v/c Ratio 1.29 0.52 0.30 0.78 0.29Uniform Delay, d1 61.5 11.4 9.3 15.5 47.9Progression Factor 0.72 1.76 2.05 2.06 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 176.0 0.6 1.9 1.9 3.0Delay (s) 220.3 20.7 21.0 33.7 50.9Level of Service F C C C DApproach Delay (s) 38.3 33.2 0.0 50.9Approach LOS D C A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 35.7 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200922: Finch Avenue & Driftwood Avenue

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 22

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 167 62 1099 103 42 123 1255 43 105 93 79 35 94 57Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.4 3.5 3.8 3.7 2.4 3.4 3.1 2.9 3.7 3.7 3.2 2.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.94Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1475 3305 1461 1534 3461 1495 1585 1500 1612 1380Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.51 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1475 3305 1461 1534 3461 1495 926 1500 860 1380Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 182 67 1195 112 46 134 1364 47 114 101 86 38 102 62RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 13 0 24 0 0 16 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 249 1195 80 0 180 1364 34 114 163 0 38 148 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 17% 8% 13% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 28% 9% 7% 24% 9%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 29.0 62.0 62.0 26.0 59.0 59.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0Effective Green, g (s) 29.0 62.0 62.0 26.0 59.0 59.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.48 0.48 0.20 0.45 0.45 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 2.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 329 1576 697 307 1571 679 199 323 185 297v/s Ratio Prot 0.17 c0.36 0.12 c0.39 0.11 0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.02 c0.12 0.04v/c Ratio 0.76 0.76 0.11 0.59 0.87 0.05 0.57 0.51 0.21 0.50Uniform Delay, d1 47.2 27.9 18.8 47.1 32.0 19.8 45.6 44.9 41.9 44.8Progression Factor 1.74 0.58 0.09 0.93 0.82 0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.3 0.0 4.7 4.1 0.1 11.4 5.6 2.5 5.8Delay (s) 83.5 16.6 1.7 48.6 30.3 10.9 57.1 50.5 44.4 50.6Level of Service F B A D C B E D D DApproach Delay (s) 26.2 31.8 53.0 49.5Approach LOS C C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 32.1 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 97: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200931: Finch Avenue & Milvan Drive

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 31

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 31 88 1114 130 200 51 1342 183 112 63 2 155 191 107Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.0 3.7 2.4 3.7 2.8 3.6 3.3 3.0 3.2 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.1Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1594 3375 1619 3267 1585 1796 1380 1879 1136Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.71 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1594 3375 1619 3267 800 1796 1033 1879 1136Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 34 96 1211 141 217 55 1459 199 122 68 2 168 208 116RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 89Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 130 1345 0 0 272 1650 0 122 69 0 168 208 27Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 60 25 4 14 4 25 33 14 14 33Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 7% 6% 7% 2% 0% 8% 7% 3% 0% 20% 27% 0% 27%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 57.0 27.0 57.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 57.0 27.0 57.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.44 0.21 0.44 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 331 1480 336 1432 185 414 238 434 262v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 0.40 c0.17 c0.50 0.04 0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 c0.16 0.02v/c Ratio 0.39 0.91 0.81 1.15 0.66 0.17 0.71 0.48 0.10Uniform Delay, d1 44.4 34.1 49.1 36.5 45.4 40.0 45.9 43.2 39.4Progression Factor 0.53 1.58 1.19 0.71 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 6.7 15.5 75.3 17.0 0.9 16.2 3.8 0.8Delay (s) 25.8 60.6 74.0 101.4 62.3 40.9 62.1 47.0 40.2Level of Service C E E F E D E D DApproach Delay (s) 57.5 97.6 54.5 50.6Approach LOS E F D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 75.4 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.2% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200932: Finch Avenue & Duncanwoods Drive

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 32

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 104 20 1284 20 88 17 1482 94 14 17 32 57 45 20Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.0 3.4 3.8 3.7 3.0 3.5 3.5 2.9 3.0 3.7 2.7 2.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.95Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1657 3310 1657 3242 1618 1484 1476 1615Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.72 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1657 3310 1657 3242 1211 1484 1122 1615Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 113 22 1396 22 96 18 1611 102 15 18 35 62 49 22RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 27 0 0 12 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 135 1417 0 0 114 1709 0 15 26 0 62 59 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 23 69 15 15 15 69 23 15 15 23Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 6% 25% 2% 0% 9% 2% 0% 10% 3% 8% 0% 3%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 71.0 12.0 71.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0Effective Green, g (s) 12.0 71.0 12.0 71.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.55 0.09 0.55 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 153 1808 153 1771 289 354 268 385v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.43 0.07 c0.53 0.02 0.04v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.06v/c Ratio 0.88 0.78 0.75 0.97 0.05 0.07 0.23 0.15Uniform Delay, d1 58.3 23.4 57.5 28.3 38.2 38.4 39.9 39.1Progression Factor 1.11 0.44 1.27 0.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 40.2 2.8 7.8 5.1 0.3 0.4 2.0 0.8Delay (s) 104.6 13.1 81.1 12.7 38.5 38.8 41.9 40.0Level of Service F B F B D D D DApproach Delay (s) 21.0 17.0 38.7 40.9Approach LOS C B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 98: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200933: Finch Avenue & Pearldale Avenue

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 33

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 51 23 1136 28 94 19 1385 6 47 15 12 48 34 40Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.1 3.6 3.5 2.8 2.9 3.7 3.2 3.3 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1631 3328 1655 3310 1577 1575 1507 1452Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.74 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1631 3328 1655 3310 1170 1575 1171 1452Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 55 25 1235 30 102 21 1505 7 51 16 13 52 37 43RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 32 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 80 1264 0 0 123 1512 0 51 19 0 52 48 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 33 6 29 6 33 29 29 33Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 10% 7% 2% 2% 8% 9% 5% 0% 0% 3% 10% 9% 16%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 13.0 72.0 13.0 72.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0Effective Green, g (s) 13.0 72.0 13.0 72.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.55 0.10 0.55 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 163 1843 166 1833 252 339 252 313v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.38 c0.07 c0.46 0.01 0.03v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 c0.04v/c Ratio 0.49 0.69 0.74 0.82 0.20 0.06 0.21 0.15Uniform Delay, d1 55.4 20.9 56.9 23.8 41.8 40.5 41.9 41.4Progression Factor 0.68 2.17 0.97 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.1 0.8 9.7 1.5 1.8 0.3 1.8 1.0Delay (s) 41.8 46.1 64.7 22.2 43.6 40.8 43.7 42.4Level of Service D D E C D D D DApproach Delay (s) 45.8 25.4 42.6 42.9Approach LOS D C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 35.2 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.1% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200934: Finch Avenue & Islington Avenue

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 34

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 243 864 56 67 358 915 126 69 806 373 49 759 161Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.7 3.8 3.6 3.7 3.2 3.7 3.4 3.0 4.2 4.1 3.2 3.7 3.6Total Lost time (s) 2.5 7.0 2.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.94Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1562 3442 1637 3323 1618 3667 1510 1607 3510 1424Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1562 3442 1637 3323 291 3667 1510 244 3510 1424Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 264 939 61 73 389 995 137 75 876 405 53 825 175RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 169 0 0 79Lane Group Flow (vph) 264 996 0 0 462 1124 0 75 876 236 53 825 96Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 42 47 62 47 42 49 62 62 49Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 6% 3% 2% 6% 7% 8% 3% 5% 5% 6% 4% 7%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 35.5 36.0 35.5 36.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0Effective Green, g (s) 35.5 36.0 35.5 36.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.28 0.27 0.28 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32Clearance Time (s) 2.5 7.0 2.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 427 953 447 920 94 1185 488 79 1134 460v/s Ratio Prot 0.17 0.29 c0.28 c0.34 0.24 0.24v/s Ratio Perm c0.26 0.16 0.22 0.07v/c Ratio 0.62 1.05 1.03 1.22 0.80 0.74 0.48 0.67 0.73 0.21Uniform Delay, d1 41.3 47.0 47.3 47.0 40.1 39.1 35.3 38.0 38.9 31.9Progression Factor 0.78 0.87 1.39 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 31.9 42.0 105.9 49.1 4.2 3.4 37.1 4.1 1.0Delay (s) 34.8 72.7 107.8 156.5 89.2 43.3 38.7 75.2 43.0 33.0Level of Service C E F F F D D E D CApproach Delay (s) 64.8 142.4 44.5 43.0Approach LOS E F D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 78.7 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.2% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 99: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200935: Finch Avenue & Kipling Avenue

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 35

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 59 237 640 47 278 904 258 15 657 255 268 613 251Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.6 3.8 3.4 3.0 3.7 2.9 3.0 3.7 3.4 3.3 3.7 3.5Total Lost time (s) 2.5 7.0 2.5 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.86Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1502 3284 1574 3258 1479 3318 1367 1708 3411 1306Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1502 3284 1574 3258 349 3318 1367 346 3411 1306Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 64 258 696 51 302 983 280 16 714 277 291 666 273RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 4 0 0 20 0 0 0 50 0 0 197Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 322 743 0 302 1243 0 16 714 227 291 666 76Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 122 1 176 176 1 122 31 31 122Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 8% 9% 16% 7% 8% 8% 13% 10% 10% 2% 7% 5%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 29.5 33.0 29.5 33.0 47.0 36.0 36.0 47.0 36.0 36.0Effective Green, g (s) 29.5 33.0 29.5 33.0 47.0 36.0 36.0 47.0 36.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.25 0.23 0.25 0.36 0.28 0.28 0.36 0.28 0.28Clearance Time (s) 2.5 7.0 2.5 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 341 834 357 827 222 919 379 240 945 362v/s Ratio Prot c0.21 0.23 0.19 c0.38 0.01 0.22 c0.10 0.20v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.17 c0.34 0.06v/c Ratio 0.94 0.89 0.85 1.50 0.07 0.78 0.60 1.21 0.70 0.21Uniform Delay, d1 49.4 46.8 48.1 48.5 27.8 43.3 40.7 36.4 42.2 36.1Progression Factor 1.61 0.54 0.66 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 33.6 12.3 11.8 229.5 0.6 6.4 6.8 127.7 4.4 1.3Delay (s) 113.2 37.5 43.6 264.8 28.4 49.7 47.6 164.1 46.6 37.4Level of Service F D D F C D D F D DApproach Delay (s) 60.3 222.1 48.8 72.4Approach LOS E F D E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 112.9 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.19Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.3% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200936: Finch Avenue & Albion Mall

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 36

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1 0 950 61 55 39 925 0 47 0 73 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3519 1789 3579 1373 1601Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1789 3519 1789 3579 1373 1601Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1 0 1033 66 60 42 1005 0 51 0 79 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1 1095 0 0 102 1005 0 51 0 18 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 149 32 32 149 149Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot custom customProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 79.0 10.0 79.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 79.0 10.0 79.0 29.0 29.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.61 0.08 0.61 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 138 2138 138 2175 306 357v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.31 c0.06 0.28v/s Ratio Perm c0.04 0.01v/c Ratio 0.01 0.51 0.74 0.46 0.17 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 55.4 14.5 58.7 13.9 40.7 39.7Progression Factor 1.02 1.47 0.83 1.25 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.4 3.2 0.1 1.2 0.3Delay (s) 56.4 21.7 51.9 17.4 41.9 39.9Level of Service E C D B D DApproach Delay (s) 21.7 20.6 40.7 0.0Approach LOS C C D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 100: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200937: Albion Road & Finch Avenue

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 37

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 12 664 342 40 593 345 133 288 915 26 246 915 12Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.4 3.5 3.3 2.6 3.7 4.2 3.7 3.0 3.5 3.1 2.7 3.7 3.4Total Lost time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1360 3368 1427 1502 3476 1560 1598 3334 1490 3500Flt Permitted 0.22 1.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 320 3368 1427 269 3476 1560 1598 3334 1490 3500Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 13 722 372 43 645 375 145 313 995 28 267 995 13RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 178 0 0 277 0 0 1 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 13 722 194 43 645 98 0 458 1022 0 267 1007 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25Heavy Vehicles (%) 14% 6% 5% 6% 5% 6% 2% 7% 6% 25% 9% 4% 6%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot ProtProtected Phases 4 8 5 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0Effective Green, g (s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 7.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 84 881 373 70 909 408 479 1000 447 1050v/s Ratio Prot c0.21 0.19 c0.29 c0.31 0.18 0.29v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.14 0.16 0.06v/c Ratio 0.15 0.82 0.52 0.61 0.71 0.24 0.96 1.02 0.60 0.96Uniform Delay, d1 36.9 45.1 41.0 42.2 43.5 37.8 44.7 45.5 38.8 44.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.76 1.27 0.84Incremental Delay, d2 3.9 8.4 5.1 34.2 4.7 1.4 23.7 28.4 5.5 18.8Delay (s) 40.8 53.5 46.1 76.4 48.2 39.2 64.4 62.8 54.7 56.6Level of Service D D D E D D E E D EApproach Delay (s) 50.9 46.2 63.3 56.2Approach LOS D D E E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 55.0 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.5% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200938: Finch Avenue & Martin Grove Road

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 38

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 124 83 735 107 204 77 888 11 127 812 274 25 406 121Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 2.8 3.1 3.7 2.8 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.8 3.7Total Lost time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1491 3258 1578 3124 1448 3292 1271 1608 3350Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1491 3258 1578 3124 507 3292 1271 270 3350Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 135 90 799 116 222 84 965 12 138 883 298 27 441 132RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 42 0 21 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 225 906 0 0 306 976 0 138 883 256 27 552 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 14 78 10 78 14 11 10 10 11Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 16% 8% 9% 2% 10% 9% 0% 13% 6% 17% 7% 4% 12%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 30.5 39.0 30.5 39.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0Effective Green, g (s) 30.5 39.0 30.5 39.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.30 0.23 0.30 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35Clearance Time (s) 2.5 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 350 977 370 937 179 1165 450 96 1185v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 0.28 c0.19 c0.31 0.27 0.16v/s Ratio Perm c0.27 0.20 0.10v/c Ratio 0.64 0.93 0.83 1.04 0.77 0.76 0.57 0.28 0.47Uniform Delay, d1 44.8 44.1 47.2 45.5 37.3 37.1 34.0 30.1 32.5Progression Factor 1.28 0.99 1.01 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.4 9.0 9.3 31.6 26.9 4.6 5.1 7.2 1.3Delay (s) 62.0 52.8 57.1 62.0 64.2 41.7 39.1 37.3 33.8Level of Service E D E E E D D D CApproach Delay (s) 54.6 60.9 43.5 34.0Approach LOS D E D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 50.2 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 101: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200939: Finch Avenue & Silverstone Drive

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 39

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 20 878 944 61 1008 24 30 41 127 18 28 19Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.8 3.8 3.7 2.9 3.8 3.7 3.1 3.1 3.7 3.2 3.3 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.94Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1551 3122 1541 3369 1445 1464 1597 1599Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.49 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1551 3122 1541 3369 1101 1464 825 1599Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 22 954 1026 66 1096 26 33 45 138 20 30 21RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 150 0 0 1 0 0 85 0 0 17 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 22 1830 0 66 1121 0 33 98 0 20 34 0Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 9% 9% 8% 9% 15% 18% 17% 6% 8% 9% 6%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 8.0 81.0 8.0 81.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0Effective Green, g (s) 8.0 81.0 8.0 81.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.62 0.06 0.62 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 95 1945 95 2099 212 282 159 308v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.59 c0.04 0.33 c0.07 0.02v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.02v/c Ratio 0.23 0.94 0.69 0.53 0.16 0.35 0.13 0.11Uniform Delay, d1 58.1 22.3 59.8 13.8 43.7 45.4 43.5 43.3Progression Factor 0.94 1.39 0.97 0.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 5.3 10.1 14.7 0.4 1.6 3.4 1.6 0.7Delay (s) 60.1 41.1 72.5 6.5 45.3 48.8 45.1 44.0Level of Service E D E A D D D DApproach Delay (s) 41.3 10.2 48.3 44.3Approach LOS D B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 31.1 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.6% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200940: Finch Avenue & Westmore Drive

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 40

Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 12 142 794 19 154 73 959 86 19 64 74 113 61 142Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 3.7 2.6 4.0 2.4 3.7 3.2 3.8 3.7 2.7 2.7 3.7 3.2 4.6 3.7Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.90Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1559 3511 1686 3412 1583 1496 1644 1755Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.61 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1559 3511 1686 3412 799 1496 1047 1755Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 13 154 863 21 167 79 1042 93 21 70 80 123 66 154RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 31 0 0 65 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 167 883 0 0 246 1130 0 21 119 0 123 155 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 20 14 17 14 20 29 17 17 29Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 3% 7% 0% 2% 3% 7% 0% 0% 0% 6% 3% 0% 6%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 32.0 49.0 32.0 49.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 32.0 49.0 32.0 49.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.38 0.25 0.38 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 384 1323 415 1286 203 380 266 446v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 0.25 c0.15 c0.33 0.08 0.09v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.12v/c Ratio 0.43 0.67 0.59 0.88 0.10 0.31 0.46 0.35Uniform Delay, d1 41.4 33.7 43.2 37.7 37.2 39.3 41.0 39.7Progression Factor 1.41 0.71 1.15 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.2 1.7 5.6 8.1 1.0 2.1 5.7 2.1Delay (s) 60.5 25.7 55.5 26.3 38.2 41.4 46.7 41.8Level of Service E C E C D D D DApproach Delay (s) 31.2 31.5 41.0 43.6Approach LOS C C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 33.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.9% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 102: m.thecrosstown.cam.thecrosstown.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/reports/... · Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200941: Finch Avenue & Highway 27

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 41

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 86 564 55 225 1166 63 167 1883 181 99 809 46Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 2.9 3.7 3.7 3.1 4.0 3.7 3.1 3.6 3.9 3.1 3.8 3.4Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1541 3349 1295 1564 5209 1463 1508 4735 1655 4925Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.09 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1541 3349 1295 1564 5209 1463 310 4735 151 4925Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 93 613 60 245 1267 68 182 2047 197 108 879 50RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 39 0 0 31 0 9 0 0 5 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 613 21 245 1267 37 182 2235 0 108 924 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 23 4 4 23 5 7 7 5Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 9% 24% 9% 4% 7% 13% 8% 7% 3% 6% 19%Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm pm+pt pm+ptProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 52.0 46.0 52.0 46.0Effective Green, g (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 52.0 46.0 52.0 46.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.40 0.35 0.40 0.35Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 379 824 319 361 1202 338 179 1675 130 1743v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.18 0.16 c0.24 c0.05 c0.47 0.04 0.19v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.03 0.36 0.29v/c Ratio 0.25 0.74 0.07 0.68 1.05 0.11 1.02 1.33 0.83 0.53Uniform Delay, d1 39.3 45.2 37.5 45.6 50.0 39.5 36.6 42.0 32.3 33.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.94 1.01 0.56 0.68 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 6.0 0.4 7.8 38.7 0.5 60.9 153.4 43.3 1.2Delay (s) 40.9 51.2 37.9 49.7 85.6 40.3 81.3 182.1 75.6 34.6Level of Service D D D D F D F F E CApproach Delay (s) 48.9 78.1 174.6 38.8Approach LOS D E F D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 107.5 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.08Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.4% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Finch Avenue West LRT November 200942: Humber College Blvd & Highway 27

Future conditions_PM 6/12/2009 Synchro 7 - ReportDelcan Corporation Page 42

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 188 221 365 223 267 11 246 1266 278 71 946 91Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1768 3176 1788 3547 1789 4953 1789 3519Flt Permitted 0.43 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 796 3176 301 3547 1789 4953 1789 3519Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 204 240 397 242 290 12 267 1376 302 77 1028 99RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 229 0 0 2 0 0 27 0 0 6 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 204 408 0 242 300 0 267 1651 0 77 1121 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 41 18 18 41 25 43 43 25Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Split ProtProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 9 9 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 39.0 25.0 39.0 25.0 38.0 38.0 37.0 37.0Effective Green, g (s) 39.0 25.0 39.0 25.0 38.0 38.0 37.0 37.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.19 0.30 0.19 0.29 0.29 0.28 0.28Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 343 611 250 682 523 1448 509 1002v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 0.13 c0.10 0.08 0.15 c0.33 0.04 c0.32v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 c0.19v/c Ratio 0.59 0.67 0.97 0.44 0.51 1.14 0.15 1.12Uniform Delay, d1 36.2 48.6 39.0 46.3 38.3 46.0 34.8 46.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.55Incremental Delay, d2 7.4 5.7 49.3 2.1 3.5 72.0 0.5 65.4Delay (s) 43.6 54.3 88.2 48.4 41.8 118.0 58.6 137.4Level of Service D D F D D F E FApproach Delay (s) 51.7 66.1 107.5 132.3Approach LOS D E F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 98.8 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.07Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.0% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group