Love, Trauma, Identity: Morrison’sDiscussion on Black Womanhood

by Soyoon Kim

FILE

TIME SUBMITTED 29-APR-2014 07:15AM

SUBMISSION ID 421601901

WORD COUNT 3598

CHARACTER COUNT 18123

C_BLOCK_AS_SOYOON_KIM.PDF (212.35K)

QM

QM

FINAL GRADE

99/100

Love, Trauma, Identity: Morrison’s Discussion on BlackWomanhoodGRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

InstructorSoyoon, you have a wonderful and solid paper here. Ienjoyed reading about Morrison while looking throughthe lens you have chosen. Your ideas Ae supportedwell. You have a wonderful command of language. Apaper to be proud of as you finish your high school.Definitely ready for college.

PAGE 1

Comment 1Impressive opening.

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 4

Improper CitationImproper citation:Improperly cited material. Please use the link below to find links to information regarding specificcitation styles: http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html

Improper CitationImproper citation:Improperly cited material. Please use the link below to find links to information regarding specificcitation styles: http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html

PAGE 5

Comment 2Who is this?

Comment 3Who is this?

PAGE 6

Comment 4Strong concluding remarks for this section.

PAGE 7

Comment 5Add book title for clarity.

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

PAGE 10

Comment 6Lovely finish.

PAGE 11

PAGE 12

RUBRIC: AUTHOR STUDY 1

IDEAS/VOICE (50%)

EXEMPLARY(5)

SKILLED(4.50)

PROFICIENT(4)

DEVELOPING(3.50)

EMERGENT(3)

ORGANIZATION (25%)

EXEMPLARY(5)

0 / 5

0 / 5

Writer shows evidence of effective, thorough research and in-depth knowledge of subject. Research effectivelysupports literary analysis of text with insightful observations and conclusions. Voice is objective and scholarly.The approved Thesis Statement is focused on valuable information, demonstrates critical thinking, and isadequately supported. Student provides meaningful insights about a reputable author of high literary merit, literarytechniques (style), themes, and selected text; independent reading is clearly evident.

Writer shows evidence of effective, thorough research and in-depth knowledge of subject.Research effectively supports literary analysis of text with insightful observations andconclusions. Voice is objective and scholarly. The approved Thesis Statement is focusedon valuable information, demonstrates critical thinking, and is adequately supported. Studentprovides meaningful insights about a reputable author of high literary merit, literarytechniques (style), themes, and selected text; independent reading is clearly evident.

Writer shows evidence of effective research and in-depth knowledge of subject. Researcheffectively supports literary analysis of text with insightful observations and conclusions.Voice is objective. The approved Thesis Statement is focused on valuable information,demonstrates critical thinking, and is adequately supported. Student provides meaningfulinsights about a reputable author of high literary merit, literary techniques (style), themes,and selected text; independent reading is clearly evident.

Writer shows evidence of research and knowledge of subject. Research effectivelysupports literary analysis of text with some insightful observations and conclusions. Voiceis objective. The approved Thesis Statement is focused on valuable information and isadequately supported. Student provides several meaningful insights about a reputableauthor of literary merit; independent reading is evident.

Writer shows developing evidence of research and knowledge of subject. Researchsupports literary analysis of text with few insightful observations and conclusions. Voice isdeveloping or inconsistent. The approved Thesis Statement is focused on valuableinformation and is inadequately supported. Student provides few meaningful insights about areputable author of literary merit.

Writer shows emergent evidence of research and knowledge of subject. Little to noResearch supports literary analysis of text. The approved Thesis Statement is unidentifiable.Student provides few meaningful insights about a reputable author of literary merit.

0 / 5

Introduction provides background on author and literary context, engages the reader, states thesis clearly andsummarizes controls. Pagination begins on page one of introduction; numbering follows MLA format. Paper is wellorganized. Each paragraph grouping develops the thesis, addresses a specific control, and follows the outline.Paragraphing is clearly developed, relates to thesis, uses well-developed supports, and employs appropriatetransitions. Paragraph divisions are logically placed. Conclusion effectively clarifies thesis, summarizes controls,examines lessons learned from research, and ends with a solid clincher.

Organization is airtight and beyond expectation for grade 12.

SKILLED(4.50)

PROFICIENT(4)

DEVELOPING(3.50)

EMERGENT(3)

SOURCE DOCUM. (15%)

EXEMPLARY(5)

SKILLED(4.50)

PROFICIENT(4)

DEVELOPING(3.50)

EMERGENT(3)

CONVENTIONS (10%)

Organization is quite strong and reaches the highest standard for grade 12.

Organization is proficient for grade 12 with most of the criteria here being met.

Organization is suffering but readable with some of the criteria here being met.

Organization is floundering and inhibits a reader from accessing the information. Few of thecriteria are met.

0 / 5

Paper parenthetically cites several direct quotes, paraphrases, and summary information in appropriate MLAformat. Parenthetical Documentation includes last name of author, or first important word of title as listed on WorksCited Page, and page numbers if available. Works Cited & Works Consulted Pages list approved, academicsources in alphabetical order by author, or by first important word of title, and demonstrate appropriate MLA format.

Paper parenthetically cites several direct (and meaty) quotes, paraphrases, and summaryinformation in appropriate MLA format. No plagiarism. Parenthetical Documentation includeslast name of author, or first important word of title as listed on Works Cited Page, and pagenumbers if available. Works Cited & Works Consulted Pages list academic sources inalphabetical order by author, or by first important word of title, and demonstrate appropriateMLA format. All source documentation aligns between WCP and intext citation.

Paper parenthetically cites several direct quotes, paraphrases, and summary information inappropriate MLA format. No plagiarism. Parenthetical Documentation is in proper MLAstructure.. Works Cited & Works Consulted Pages list , some academic sources inalphabetical order by author, or by first important word of title, and demonstrate appropriateMLA format. Most source documentation aligns between WCP and intext citation.

A few questions may arise regarding either proper citation formatting or usage. WCP andintext documentation are pretty solid but may have a few gaps. Students mostly utilizesproper source documentation. Inconsequential questions of plagiarism.

Questions arise regarding either proper citation formatting or usage. WCP and intextdocumentation are pretty solid but may have a few gaps. Students begins to utilize propersource documentation; questions of plagiarism.

Sloppiness or clear gaps in understanding how to properly document a research paper.Definite problems with plagiarism. In the case of gross plagiarism, the paper may receive anF.

0 / 5

Final draft is neatly typed, carefully edited, and double-spaced with MLA heading. *An electronic copy will besubmitted to turnitin.com prior to the in-class due date. *No title page is required. Sentences utilize proper structureand variety in phrasing and length. Paper indicates strong control of spelling, grammar, usage, consistent verbtense, and punctuation. Word Choice/Diction is formal, objective, and varied; tone is academic. Paper incorporatesa variety of sophisticated rhetorical devices.

EXEMPLARY(5)

SKILLED(4.50)

PROFICIENT(4)

DEVELOPING(3.50)

EMERGENT(3)

Final draft is neatly typed, carefully edited, and double-spaced with MLA heading. Sentencesutilize proper structure and variety in phrasing and length. Paper indicates strong control ofspelling, grammar, usage, consistent verb tense, and punctuation. Paper incorporates avariety of sophisticated rhetorical devices.

Final draft is neatly typed, carefully edited, and double-spaced with MLA heading. Sentencesutilize proper structure and variety in phrasing and length. Paper indicates control ofconventions. Paper incorporates a variety of rhetorical devices.

Final draft is typed, edited, and double-spaced with MLA heading. Sentences utilize properstructure. Paper indicates good control of conventions. Paper may incorporate a variety ofrhetorical devices.

Final draft is typed with little attention to MLA formatting. Sentences begin to inhibit thereader's understanding. Paper indicates poor control of conventions.

This is clearly not a final draft.