living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

30
‘Living fossil’ vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution Graeme T. Lloyd

Upload: graeme-lloyd

Post on 29-Aug-2014

421 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

‘Living fossil’ vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Graeme T. Lloyd

Page 2: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Bac

kgro

und

Page 3: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Conference on Genetics, Paleontology and Evolution held at Princeton, January 1947

Thomas Stanley Westoll

George Gaylord Simpson

Bac

kgro

und

Page 4: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

George Gaylord Simpson• T&M published 1944• Confirmed that rates

vary• Three basic tempos:

– Tachytely (fast)– Horotely (‘normal’)– Bradytely (slow, living

fossils)• Only looked at single

characters1902 – 1984

Bac

kgro

und

Page 5: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Thomas Stanley Westoll• Devised a method to

investigate tempo in multiple characters

• Constructed character-taxon matrix and added states (‘scoring’ taxa)

• 14 dipnoan genera and 26 ordered multi-state characters

• Plotted scores vs. time1912 – 1995

Bac

kgro

und

Page 6: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Bac

kgro

und

(Westoll 1949)

Page 7: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Problems with Westoll’s methodology:

• Ancestor artificial (Schopf 1984)• Only well known taxa can be included

(Knoll et al. 1984)• Error bars required (constrain

interpretation)• Reversals ignored (Derstler 1982)• Assumes stratigraphically ordered

ancestor-descendant sequence

Met

hodo

logy

Page 8: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Previous Solutions

• Derstler 1982 and Forey 1988• Used cladistic (character-taxon) matrices• Scored internal nodes of phylogeny (which

are complete)• Scored as number of character changes

between nodes (i.e. include reversals)But:• These authors were calculating rates

Met

hodo

logy

Page 9: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

The Problem With Rates I

• Rate of change = Δx / Δt• Δt often zero between nodes (rate = ∞)• Solution: add arbitrary value to Δt

– Derstler 1982 Δt + 1Ma– Cloutier 1991 Δt + 2Ma– Forey 1988 Δt + 5Ma

• Problem: predicts earlier origin of clade, e.g. Forey value necessitates pre-Cambrian lungfish

Met

hodo

logy

Page 10: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

The Problem With Rates II

• Rates also suffer from the problem of comparability

Solution:• Use the desirable properties of scoring

internal nodes, incorporating reversals and a phylogenetic context, but…

• …retain Westoll’s plotting method• Reduces assumptions (e.g.

anagenesis/cladogenesis)

Met

hodo

logy

Page 11: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Revisiting Lungfish Evolution

• Compiled ‘supermatrix’ from six published matrices

• 85 dipnoan taxa, 2 outgroups and 132 characters

• 4118 MPTs• Tree with best-fit to stratigraphy used

(worst-fit very similar)

Met

hodo

logy

Page 12: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Res

ults

Page 13: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

“it appears possible that the pattern of scores follows directly from the method of analysis”

(Schopf 1984)

1. Artificial ancestor2. Number of characters and states

recognised a function of number of taxa (most of which are Devonian)

Art

efac

t?

Page 14: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Art

efac

t?Schopf 2: Number of characters and states is a

function of number of taxa

Page 15: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Art

efac

t?Schopf 2: Number of characters and states is a

function of number of taxa

r2 = 0.98853131

Page 16: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Schopf 2: Number of characters and states is a function of number of taxa

Art

efac

t?

Page 17: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

“it appears possible that the pattern of scores follows directly from the method of analysis”

(Schopf 1984)

1. Artificial ancestor2. Number of characters and states recognised a

function of number of taxa (most of which are Devonian)

3. If changes were late we would recognise a new group instead (e.g. birds from reptiles)

4. A paedomorphic trend (Bemis 1984) in lungfish would limit the number of available character states as time progressed

Art

efac

t?

Page 18: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Paedomorphosis as an explanation for the lungfish pattern

• Paedomorphosis can be obligate and irreversible (Bonett & Chippindale 2006)

• Bemis’ (1984) hypothesis for a paedomorphic trend in lungfish can be tested as 5 of his 7 characters appear here

• However, all 5 have low CI’s (0.2-0.4) and most include reversals (under DELTRAN)

• Peramorphic trends also known in lungfish (Long 1993)

Art

efac

t?

Page 19: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Lungfish Pattern as a Biological Phenomena

• Westoll/Simpson saw it as ‘quantum evolution’

Bio

logi

cally

Rea

l?

Page 20: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Bio

logi

cally

Rea

l?“The lungfish [adaptive] zone would seem to be quite narrow and

yet it has persisted without marked change…for perhaps 200 million years” (Simpson 1953)

Page 21: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Lungfish Pattern as a Biological Phenomena

• Westoll/Simpson saw it as ‘quantum evolution’

• Others argue for specialisation (aestivation/air-breathing)

Bio

logi

cally

Rea

l?

Page 22: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Oth

er G

roup

s

(Cloutier 1991)

Actinistians

Page 23: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

(Lloyd in prep.)

RhynchocephaliansO

ther

Gro

ups

Page 24: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

(Grande and Bemis 1998)

AmiidsO

ther

Gro

ups

Page 25: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

(Alroy 1995)

EquidsO

ther

Gro

ups

Page 26: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

(Gatesy et al. 2004)

CrocodiliansO

ther

Gro

ups

Page 27: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

(Makovicky et al. 2005)

ManiraptoransO

ther

Gro

ups

Page 28: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

(Gentry and Hooker 1988)

ArtiodactylsO

ther

Gro

ups

Page 29: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

(Rieppel and deBraga 1996)

ReptilesO

ther

Gro

ups

Page 30: Living fossil' vertebrates and rates of morphological evolution

Conclusions

• A simple modification of Westoll’s methodology for use with cladistic matrices is presented

• Application of this method to a lungfish ‘supermatrix’ confirms a pattern of arrested evolutionary tempo

• However, this pattern may be a more general feature of evolution

Con

clus

ions