“livelihoods of the urban poor: case of varanasi city in uttar pradesh in india”

40
“Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India” Summary Report Arun Keshav 28 April 2015 [email protected]

Upload: arun-keshav

Post on 17-Aug-2015

37 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

“Livelihoods of the urban poor: Caseof Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh inIndia”

Summary Report

Arun Keshav

28 April 2015

[email protected]

Page 2: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

1

Contents

1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 2

2. Review of the Literature ....................................................................................................................... 4

3. Research Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 5

4. Key Findings and Discussions .............................................................................................................. 6

4.1. Profile of Livelihood Activities the Urban Poor: ..........................................................6

4.2. Assets Possessed by the Urban Poor .......................................................................11

4.3. Vulnerability of the Urban Poor.............................................................................26

4.4. Livelihood Strategies of the Urban Poor Households ...................................................31

5. Conclusion and Recommendations .....................................................................................................33

Bibliography ...............................................................................................................................................36

Tables

Table 4.1.1 Sources of livelihoods for the urban poor in Varanasi City. ................................................. 8Table 4.3.1 Risk Terminology ...............................................................................................................27Table 4.3.2 Shocks faced by the Urban Poor Households. ....................................................................28Table 4.3.3 Exposure to systemic inefficiencies leading to increased vulnerability..............................28Table 4.3.4 Impacts of risks not managed effectively............................................................................30

Figures

Figure 4.1.1 Share of livelihood activities in each sub-category of unorganised workers ........................ 9Figure 4.1.2 Mix of wage worker, self-employed and home-worker in male and female workers ..........10Figure 4.2.2 : Visual Representation of Social Relations as an Asset .......................................................21

Boxes

Box 4.2.1 High Achievement Motivation: Case of Ramashray...............................................................13Box 4.2.2 Low Achievement Motivation: Case of Sharda’s husband- Lal Bahadur...............................14Box 4.2.3 Addiction affecting returns on Human Capital: Case of Sarita Devi.......................................16Box 4.2.4 Intra-Household Relations - Case of Binda Devi ....................................................................17Box 4.2.5 Commitment and sincerity of the female lead of household – Case of Manju Devi...............19Box 4.2.6 The Free Lunch: Case of Collateral-Security Free Loans from MFIs.....................................21

Page 3: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

2

1. Introduction

Research motivationPoverty is something which is still rampant and can be seen, observed and felt easily around, in

India. This made me ponder; on poverty, its attributes, and on lives of children, women and,

men, who live in abject poverty; on present and future of our country, amidst poverty. How do

they (poor) negotiate with this? What makes them so poor? Why poor continue to remain poor?

What stops them coming out of poverty? What sustains them amidst scarcity and crisis? What do

they do to earn their living? How do their family as a unit work? Can we do something to help

families move out of poverty? If yes, what? How? And so on...

Obviously, not simplest of the questions to answer! However when I got this opportunity to

research on topic of my interest, I decided to explore further in to some of these aspects related

to poor and poverty.

Hence the topic “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City” was chosen for study.

Research QuestionsThis research aimed to answer following research questions:

1. What are the characteristics of livelihood activities undertaken by Urban Slum Dwelling(USD) poor households in Varanasi city?

2. What ‘Assets’ (tangible and intangible) do these urban slum dwelling poor householdspossess and what are the characteristics of these assets?

3. What is the nature and sources of risks and shocks these households are vulnerable to?

4. Do households adopt any livelihood strategies to manage their assets to build upon theircapacities? If yes then what?

5. What could be the possible levers, which when applied, could lead to increased capacitiesand reduced vulnerabilities of these households?

Page 4: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

3

The Concept of Livelihoods

Before proceeding further, it is important to get a clear conception of the concept of livelihoods.

Livelihoods are much more than mere income generation. Chambers and Conway (1992),defines livelihood as comprising of “Capabilities, assets (stores, resources, claims and accesses)1

and activities required for means of living”. They go on to add that “a livelihood is sustainablewhich can cope with and recover from stress and shocks, maintain or enhance its capabilities andassets, and provide sustainable livelihood opportunities to the next generation; and contribute netbenefits to other livelihoods at the local and global levels in the long and in the short term.”Chambers and Conway explain capabilities from livelihoods perspective as “being able to copewith stress2 and shocks3, and being able to find make use of livelihood opportunities. Suchcapabilities as are not just reactive, they are also proactive and dynamically adaptable”.

Datta, Mahajan, & Thakur (2005) in BASIX’s “Resource Book for Livelihood Promotion” notethat that ideally:

• a livelihood should keep a person meaningfully occupied,• in a sustainable manner,

• with dignity

Ellis & Freeman (2005) explains: “the term livelihood attempts to capture not just what peopledo in order to make a living, but the resources that provide them with the capability to build asatisfactory living, the risk factors that they must consider in managing their resources, and theinstitutional and policy context that either helps or hinders them in their pursuit of a viable orimproving living”.

Desired livelihood outcomes like increase in income, increased well-being, improved foodsecurity etc. are achieved through livelihood strategy that the households undertake.“Livelihood strategies are used to denote the range and combination of activities and choices thatpeople make/undertake in order to achieve their livelihood goals (including productive activities,investment strategies, reproductive choices, etc.)” (DFID, 1999).

1 Stores & Resources: These are tangible assets commanded by a household. Stores include food stocks, stores ofvalue like gold, jewelry, woven textiles and cash savings in banks of thrift and credit schemes. Resources includeland, water, trees, and livestock; and farm equipments, tools and domestic utensils.Claims & Accesses: These are intangible assets with the household. Claims are demands or appeals which can bemade for material, moral or other practical support or access from individual or agencies. They are based oncombinations of right, precedent, social convention, moral obligation and power. Access is opportunity in practice touse a resource, store or service (Chambers & Conway, 1992).

2 Stress: Stresses are pressures are pressures which are typically cumulative, predictable, variously continuous orcyclical such as seasonal shortages; rising populations, declining soil fertility, and air pollution (Chambers &Conway, 1992).

3 Shock: Shocks are impacts which are typically sudden, unpredictable, and traumatic, such as fires, floods, storms,epidemics, thefts, civil disorder, and wars (Chambers & Conway, 1992).

Page 5: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

4

2. Review of the Literature

The review of the literature was centered on key terms like urban poverty, livelihoods,livelihoods of the, the Asset-Vulnerability of the poor, livelihood strategy of the poorhouseholds etc.

The gaps as identified of literature review are as follows:

• Major focus related to mainstream poverty research has been on identification of poor

and on measurement of poverty. Though identification and measurement are very

important and is a prerequisite for poverty alleviation interventions, this is not an end

in itself. It is important to look beyond these aspects to further understand the nature

poverty. Such that we may come closer to making more effective programmes for

poverty reduction.

• The major livelihood approach- the Sustainable Livelihood Approach (SLA) has

mainly been studied in rural context and with the population trend shifting focus on

further exploring on livelihoods and urban poverty is required afresh.

• The Asset-based approach limits itself more on asset aspects and undermines the risks

and sources of risks.

• Not much research done related to urban poverty in context of 1-5 million population

cities like Varanasi.

Owing to this aforesaid gaps this research study was undertaken which aimed to explore

further on assets that urban poor possess in cities like Varanasi, their vulnerability, sources of

livelihoods, their livelihood strategy etc.

Page 6: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

5

3. Research Methodology

The research tried to explore further into the lives and livelihoods of the urban poor. Researchquestions were framed in order to understand the livelihood activities, the assets possessed, thevulnerabilities, the livelihoods strategies of the urban poor and identify levers to alleviate urbanpoverty.

Varanasi was chosen as the representative city for the study.

In Varanasi city three major slums were selected for study of livelihoods of the urban slumdwelling households. These slums are Nagwa, pasianagali Lahartara and Shivpurwa. The threeslums were selected through purposive sampling so as to get a proper representation of biggerslums in the city spread across geographical locations. Apart from respondents of these slums,respondents residing in other poverty pockets were also randomly selected. The total sample sizechosen was of 100.

Next a cross sectional data was collected through intensive field work spread over three months,in selected samples, using participatory techniques. The three tools were used for data collectionand these were household interviews using mainly open ended semi-structured schedule;observations, Focused Group Discussions (FGD) and Key Informant Interviews (KII). Datacollected from different tools helped to triangulate the data collected.

The respondents of the personal interviews were adult members of slum dwelling households,either male or female. Data related to their household were obtained from individualrespondents. All the interviews were conducted in natural settings mostly in place of residence ofthe respondent. The FGDs were conducted in field in which the poor residing in particular slumboth male and female participated. The KIIs were conducted with people who had knowledgeabout the urban poor like people from NGOs, Government etc.

The interviews thus conducted were recorded and transcribed to obtain extensive qualitativedata.The data was analysed by content analysis, case study method and pattern analysis.

Limitations• Owing to space constraint in houses of slum dwellers, the interviews were conducted in open

with onlooker, this posed some difficulties to raise personal and sensitive issues likedomestic violence, hunger,use of contraception etc.

• No women interviewer was part of interviewing team, which meant personal questionsbeyond a limit could not be asked.

• Limited time and resource were available.• No follow-up actions were planned hence to keep the expectations of the respondents to

minimal, details beyond a limit were not taken.

Page 7: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

6

4. Key Findings and Discussions

This research aimed to explore further in to livelihoods of the urban poor. Varanasi city waschosen as the context for this study. The manifested livelihood activities of the urban poor aremere epitome of factors in the backdrop, which shapes their livelihoods, the way they are. Thesefactors which shape the livelihoods of the urban poor: their assets, their vulnerability, thestrategy they adopt etc. are even more important to understand.

Hence the field research thus conducted, in context of Varanasi city, tried to answer the researchquestions, revolving around the livelihood activities and the contributing factors. The findingsthus obtained are presented as follows:

4.1. Profile of Livelihood Activities the Urban Poor:

• Urban Poor are mainly engaged as unorganised workers4, mostly in unorganised5 sectorand this forms the major source of their livelihoods.

Field study revealed that urban poor in Varanasi are employed either as casual or as temporaryworkers, in construction sector, as masons or labourers or involved in whitewashing or paintingof buildings; As waiters or helpers with marriage party caterers, getting paid something betweenRs. 225 to 350 per day. Else they work as domestic helps or cooks; as auto drivers etc. Else theywork as self-employed as Rickshaw or cart pullers, doing petty businesses, working as streetvendors, as putting up mobile food stalls, cobblers, rag picking etc. Another category oflivelihood activity of urban poor is that of working from home, on piece rate basis, engaged inmaking nylon threads, cutting and packaging of piped wafers (food item), fan polishing,tailoring, mala making etc.

4 “Unorganised workers consist of those working in the unorganised enterprises or households, excluding regularworkers with social security benefits, and the workers in the formal sector without any employment/ social securitybenefits provided by the employers”. The employees with informal jobs generally do not enjoy employment security(no protection against arbitrary dismissal) work security (no protection against accidents and illness at the workplace) and social security (maternity and health care benefits, pension, etc.) and these characteristics can be used foridentifying informal employment (NCEUS, 2007).

5 The unorganised sector consists of all unincorporated private enterprises owned by individuals or householdsengaged in the sale and production of goods and services operated on a proprietary or partnership basis and with lessthan ten total workers (NCEUS, 2007).

Page 8: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

7

Referring to NCEUS (2007) definitions these unorganised workers could further be sub-categorised as wage workers6 (includes casual7 and temporary workers, migrant workers, orthose employed by households including domestic workers); as self-employed8 workers (includesOwn Account workers9 and owners of enterprise with hired workers) and home-workers10.

The field research revealed that of the sample drawn 97% of the total workers worked asunorganised or informal workers while only 3% were organised workers.Out of these unorganised workers almost 100% gained their livelihoods directly by employingtheir labour, only 5% of these reported to supplement their livelihoods through alternate sourcesmainly earning rent on houses and goat rearing.

This reveals that employing labour remains the only major source of gaining livelihoods for theurban poor.

Table 4.1 gives the picture of different source of livelihood activities of these unorganisedworkers in Varanasi city.

6 Wage Workers in the Unorganised Sector: Wage workers are persons employed for remuneration as unorganisedworkers, directly by employers or through agencies or contractors. Wage-workers include casual and temporaryworkers, migrant workers, or those employed by households including domestic workers. Wage-workers alsoinclude regular workers in the unorganised sector (NCEUS, 2007).

7 Casual labourers: Labourers that are hired on casual basis, perhaps on some daily arrangement or for someprescribed short duration. Casual labour is normally hired to carry out tasks that are easily amenable to observations(Ray, 2009).

8 Self-employed in the Unorganised Sector: These are persons who operate farm or non-farm enterprises or engagein a profession or trade, either on own account, individually or with partners, or as home-based workers. Ownaccount workers include unpaid family workers also (NCEUS, 2007).

9 Own account workers: who are also called own account enterprises (OAE), work as tiny enterprises often with thehelp of family labour without hired workers (NCEUS, 2007).

10 ILO Home Work Convention No. 177, adopted in 1996, refers exclusively to home-workers. a home-worker isdefined as a person who carried out work for remuneration in premises of his/her choice, other than the work placeof the employer, resulting in a product or service as specified by the employer, irrespective of who provided theequipment, material or inputs used. This is a sub-category of a broader category of home-based workers. The home-workers fall in an intermediate position between the self-employed and the wage workers, or the employee(NCEUS, 2007).

Page 9: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

8

Table 4.1.1 Sources of livelihoods for the urban poor in Varanasi City.

Sub-category

Main ActivitiesMale

workersFemaleworkers

Total

Wage-worker

Construction Workers( masons and labourers)

Waiters or Helpers with caterers (catering tomarriage parties),

Loading auto drivers,Whitewashing,Domestic Help,

Cooks,Work in shops

49(56)

23(72)

72(60)

Self-employed

Rickshaw pulling,Rickshaw trolley puller,

Petty shops,Mobile food stalls,

street vending,cobbling & shoe polish,

cloth pressing,Renting of Rickshaws,

Rag picking,Livestock rearing etc.

35(40)

2(6)

37(31)

Home-worker

Nylon rope making,Cutting and Packaging piped wafers

(food item),Mala making,Fan polishing,Tailoring etc.

4(5)

7(22)

11(9)

Total 88 32 120

Source: Field data (N=120)

Note: Figures in parenthesis shows the percentage figures of total male workers, total femaleworkers and total workers respectively.

The share of livelihood sources for the urban poor households with reference to various sub-categories of unorganised work opportunities available to them is depicted graphically in Figure4.1.

Page 10: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

9

Figure 4.1.1 Share of livelihood activities in each sub-category of unorganised workers

Source: Field Data

Figure 4.1 depicts that the major source of livelihoods for the urban poor comes from working asa wage worker (with a major share of casual wage labour in that). This is followed by self-employment and working as home-workers.

If we refer to Figure 4.2 we find that both male and female workers with in their categories findmaximum livelihood opportunities in working as wage workers.

For male workers, maximum opportunity to work as wage worker comes from constructionsector. 59% of Male wage workers work in construction sector mainly as casual wage worker aslabourers or masons or else work in white washing and painting of buildings. Though relativelythe wages are better for construction workers in range of Rs. 200 to Rs. 350 per day theavailability of work is highly erratic. Most of the respondents said that they are only able to getwork for 15-20 days in a month. A statement recorded in field given by a mason aptly describesthe situation.

“On an average I get 14-15 days of work in a month, Days on which I have work, I am better offeven than a Sarkari Babu, but on days I do not get anything, my condition is worse than the

worst”.- A Mason in Nagwa Basti of Varanasi City

Following the construction sector is the transport sector in which urban poor male workers findwork, mainly as drivers of loading auto rickshaw, as mechanics etc. 16% of the total male wage

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

wage worker self-employed

60%

9

Figure 4.1.1 Share of livelihood activities in each sub-category of unorganised workers

Source: Field Data

Figure 4.1 depicts that the major source of livelihoods for the urban poor comes from working asa wage worker (with a major share of casual wage labour in that). This is followed by self-employment and working as home-workers.

If we refer to Figure 4.2 we find that both male and female workers with in their categories findmaximum livelihood opportunities in working as wage workers.

For male workers, maximum opportunity to work as wage worker comes from constructionsector. 59% of Male wage workers work in construction sector mainly as casual wage worker aslabourers or masons or else work in white washing and painting of buildings. Though relativelythe wages are better for construction workers in range of Rs. 200 to Rs. 350 per day theavailability of work is highly erratic. Most of the respondents said that they are only able to getwork for 15-20 days in a month. A statement recorded in field given by a mason aptly describesthe situation.

“On an average I get 14-15 days of work in a month, Days on which I have work, I am better offeven than a Sarkari Babu, but on days I do not get anything, my condition is worse than the

worst”.- A Mason in Nagwa Basti of Varanasi City

Following the construction sector is the transport sector in which urban poor male workers findwork, mainly as drivers of loading auto rickshaw, as mechanics etc. 16% of the total male wage

self-employed Home-worker

31%

9%

9

Figure 4.1.1 Share of livelihood activities in each sub-category of unorganised workers

Source: Field Data

Figure 4.1 depicts that the major source of livelihoods for the urban poor comes from working asa wage worker (with a major share of casual wage labour in that). This is followed by self-employment and working as home-workers.

If we refer to Figure 4.2 we find that both male and female workers with in their categories findmaximum livelihood opportunities in working as wage workers.

For male workers, maximum opportunity to work as wage worker comes from constructionsector. 59% of Male wage workers work in construction sector mainly as casual wage worker aslabourers or masons or else work in white washing and painting of buildings. Though relativelythe wages are better for construction workers in range of Rs. 200 to Rs. 350 per day theavailability of work is highly erratic. Most of the respondents said that they are only able to getwork for 15-20 days in a month. A statement recorded in field given by a mason aptly describesthe situation.

“On an average I get 14-15 days of work in a month, Days on which I have work, I am better offeven than a Sarkari Babu, but on days I do not get anything, my condition is worse than the

worst”.- A Mason in Nagwa Basti of Varanasi City

Following the construction sector is the transport sector in which urban poor male workers findwork, mainly as drivers of loading auto rickshaw, as mechanics etc. 16% of the total male wage

Page 11: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

10

worker works in transport sector which is followed by working in shops, working with caterersetc.While engagement in transport sector and shops though temporary are less erratic in terms ofavailability of work, the wages are very low. Hence there seems to be a trade-off betweenavailability of work and wages. More erratic work has relatively higher wages while a less erraticwork has relatively lower wages.

Figure 4.1.2 Mix of wage worker, self-employed and home-worker in male and female workers

Source: Field Data

While for urban poor female workers as well the maximum livelihood opportunities ariseworking as wage workers (72% of total female workers). Out of these female wage workers 52%are engaged as domestic helps, in well-off households, while 26% of women wage workers workas cooks mostly in well-off households. Hence about 80% of urban poor women wage workersgets engaged in well-off households in their localities.

These female workers engaged in households earn on an average between Rs. 1000 to Rs. 3000per month depending on number of household they work. Their income is not that erratic butwages are very low, on an average they work in 3-4 houses.

Further, while the wage-workers (56%) form the biggest sub-category for male workers; it isfollowed by the self-employed sub-category (40% of total male workers working as selfemployed workers).

The urban poor self-employed workers are mostly own account workers. The, own-account maleworkers, work as cycle rickshaw pullers, the rickshaws in most of the cases are hired on rentalbasis at the rate of Rs. 30 per day for eight hours. Besides lack of access of finance to buy a

0102030405060

56 %

40 %

Male Workers

10

worker works in transport sector which is followed by working in shops, working with caterersetc.While engagement in transport sector and shops though temporary are less erratic in terms ofavailability of work, the wages are very low. Hence there seems to be a trade-off betweenavailability of work and wages. More erratic work has relatively higher wages while a less erraticwork has relatively lower wages.

Figure 4.1.2 Mix of wage worker, self-employed and home-worker in male and female workers

Source: Field Data

While for urban poor female workers as well the maximum livelihood opportunities ariseworking as wage workers (72% of total female workers). Out of these female wage workers 52%are engaged as domestic helps, in well-off households, while 26% of women wage workers workas cooks mostly in well-off households. Hence about 80% of urban poor women wage workersgets engaged in well-off households in their localities.

These female workers engaged in households earn on an average between Rs. 1000 to Rs. 3000per month depending on number of household they work. Their income is not that erratic butwages are very low, on an average they work in 3-4 houses.

Further, while the wage-workers (56%) form the biggest sub-category for male workers; it isfollowed by the self-employed sub-category (40% of total male workers working as selfemployed workers).

The urban poor self-employed workers are mostly own account workers. The, own-account maleworkers, work as cycle rickshaw pullers, the rickshaws in most of the cases are hired on rentalbasis at the rate of Rs. 30 per day for eight hours. Besides lack of access of finance to buy a

5 %

Male Workers

01020304050607080

72 %

6 %

Female Workers

10

worker works in transport sector which is followed by working in shops, working with caterersetc.While engagement in transport sector and shops though temporary are less erratic in terms ofavailability of work, the wages are very low. Hence there seems to be a trade-off betweenavailability of work and wages. More erratic work has relatively higher wages while a less erraticwork has relatively lower wages.

Figure 4.1.2 Mix of wage worker, self-employed and home-worker in male and female workers

Source: Field Data

While for urban poor female workers as well the maximum livelihood opportunities ariseworking as wage workers (72% of total female workers). Out of these female wage workers 52%are engaged as domestic helps, in well-off households, while 26% of women wage workers workas cooks mostly in well-off households. Hence about 80% of urban poor women wage workersgets engaged in well-off households in their localities.

These female workers engaged in households earn on an average between Rs. 1000 to Rs. 3000per month depending on number of household they work. Their income is not that erratic butwages are very low, on an average they work in 3-4 houses.

Further, while the wage-workers (56%) form the biggest sub-category for male workers; it isfollowed by the self-employed sub-category (40% of total male workers working as selfemployed workers).

The urban poor self-employed workers are mostly own account workers. The, own-account maleworkers, work as cycle rickshaw pullers, the rickshaws in most of the cases are hired on rentalbasis at the rate of Rs. 30 per day for eight hours. Besides lack of access of finance to buy a

6 %

22 %

Female Workers

Page 12: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

11

rickshaw, space constraint to keep owned rickshaw safely contributes to not owning it. Otherown account activity includes loading cycle rickshaw trolley used to transport goods with inmandis; putting up food stalls on road side like boiled egg, omelet stalls, snacks stalls etc.

Migrants from West Bengal (mostly Muslims) who lives in temporary squatters on rented landsmostly in slum areas, work as rag pickers and their whole family is involved in this, typicallythey are bound to sell the sorted recyclable rags to the land owners who are also a player in thisrecycling business subsector.

Besides these own-accounts self-employed workers involve in petty business, in street vending,in large numbers.

While, for women workers the wage-worker (72%) sub-category is followed by home-workers(22% of total women workers work as home workers). The women home-workers are mostlyinvolved in packaging of food items, tailoring, mala making etc. These women home-workerswork in their own homes producing products as specified by the employer, in general, thematerial is supplied by their employers and they get paid on piece-rate basis.

Further, the field study also revealed that the traditional skills and occupations like that ofhandloom weaving, making of leather shoes, chappals and other leather products; which werethe main stay livelihoods for the urban poor in the yesteryears have either phased out or inprocess of phasing out.

4.2. Assets Possessed by the Urban Poor

Assets are what the poor possess. This includes both tangible and intangible assets (Moser ,2006).

Assets have an important role in shaping up the livelihood outcomes of poor. Assets add to thecapacity of households, interact with external context and with proper interface in place givereturns by transmuting to livelihood outcomes and adding on resilience to the household.

Bebbington (1999) goes a degree further to say that “Assets are not simply resources that peopleuse to build livelihoods: they give them the capability11 to be and act”.

This research thus looks further into the assets possessed by the urban poor households and itscharacteristics and influence it has on the lives and livelihoods of the poor.

11 Human Capability: Focuses on the ability of human beings to lead lives they have reason to value and to enhancethe substantive choices they have (Sen, Editorial: Human Capital and Human Capability, 1997).

Page 13: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

12

The assets possessed by the urban poor thus identified through the field study have beenenumerated as under:

• The Human Capital

• Intra-Household Relations• Commitment, sincerity and sensibility12 of the female lead13 of household

• Social Relations• Physical Assets

- House- Mobile Phone- Other Productive Physical Assets

These aforementioned assets thus possessed by urban poor households are being discussed asunder:

The Human CapitalThe human capital is the most important asset that an urban poor household possesses. If werefer to Section 4.1 we can see that almost 100% of the urban poor households gain theirlivelihoods from directly employing or selling their labour. Further, as low as only about 5%, ofthe sample urban poor households could supplement their main livelihood source, drawn byemploying their labour, by other sources like earning from rents, renting their productive assets,selling their livestock etc.Given its meager resource, the human capital thus becomes the key asset around which the webof the livelihood for a poor household gets spun.Further, this field research brought forward certain behavioral dimensions, factors intrinsic toindividuals, observed to be significantly affecting the returns on human assets apart fromtraditional factors.The two factors, thus identified are:

i. Achievement Motivation14 of individuals.ii. Addictions of individuals.

12 Sensibility:a. Capacity to feel;b. Susceptibility, sensitiveness (to); delicacy of feeling (Great Encyclopaedic Dictionary, 1964).

13 Female lead here means: wife of the male household head or a female leading a household.14 Achievement motivation has thus been defined in different ways from different perspectives; some of thedefinitions of Achievement Motivation are as follows:

- A recurrent need to improve one’s past performance (McClelland 1987) [As cited in Takeuchi et al. 2012].- “Achievement behavior is defined as behavior directed at developing or demonstrating high rather than low

ability” (Nicholls, 1984) .- According to Atkinson and Feather (1966) “Achievement motivation is conceived as a talent disposition

which is manifested in overt striving only when the individual perceives performance as instrumental to asense of personal accomplishment.” As cited in (Adsul & Kamble, 2008)

Page 14: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

13

Achievement MotivationTwo cases, Box 4.2.1 and 4.2.2, drawn from field data, have been presented here, on how twoindividuals having similar type skills, health and other factors may still have varying success interms of achieving their livelihood goals and sustaining them. This difference could be attributedto their varying achievement motivation.

These field findings have been put forward as cases and discussed further.

Box 4.2.1 High Achievement Motivation: Case of Ramashray

Ramashray is a young and dynamic man of about 30 years of age belonging to scheduled castecategory. He resides in Pasiyana gali of Kabeer Math, Lahartara. His present family consists ofhimself and a younger unmarried sister.

Presently Ramashray owns a contract for parking lot of a leading private hospital in the city. Heis also on a look out for bidding and wining contract for another parking lot in one of the city’sprominent girl’s college. Ramashray also employs three people, on daily wages, for working inparking lot and pays a sum of Rs. 3000 per month to the hospital. Ramashray is doing well forhimself and aims to do even better.

Life had not been this good always for Ramashray. In fact it ever remained full of challenges andstill is. Ramashray is physically handicapped as one of his legs got affected by polio. Also he losthis mother quite early when he was still a child.

Despite of stiff challenges he never gave up and persisted for his improvement and kept raisinghis bar to do better in life.

Ramashray narrates that his father was a casual labourer but did not keep in good health and diedsome five years back due to lung infection. Owing to his father’s poor health and prematuredeath of his mother Ramashray was forced to start working at a very early age and could notstudy beyond class fifth. He worked as a casual labourer for quite long and was the only earningmember of the family as his father was not in a position to work. In due course while moving onhe started working as a staff in one of the parking lots in Manduadih station. He worked there forfour years and now has taken up the entrepreneurial path and is presently self employed.Ram says his personal expenditures are minimal and is not addicted to alcohol or any othersubstance neither is he addicted to gambling like many others in his basti, he says he has to dowell in future hence he limits his personal expenses.

Stating about himself he says “I am far sited person, I kept gaining knowledge about how work isaccomplished how people progress. I worked hard and did well. I think that if I become capableenough I can help others”.

Page 15: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

14

Box 4.2.2 Low Achievement Motivation: Case of Sharda’s husband- Lal Bahadur

Sharda, aged around 36 years, lives with her three children, her husband – Lal Bahadur, herfather-in-law, and grandmother of his husband in a slum in Sukulpura, Sarai nandan in GandhiNagar area of Varanasi; Sharda’s minor sister also stays with her.

Fortunately-unfortunately she is the major bread winner for her family of eight. She works asdomestic help in neighbourhoods and earns something between Rs. 1000 to Rs. 1700 per month.Her husband who is an able bodied skilled carpenter, is a casual worker and works onlyoccasionally. He is not an alcoholic nor has addiction to any other substance.

Sharda says for last two years the major responsibility of taking care of house hold lies with her.Prior to that, she was not required to work outside. Reason being her father-in-law was activeand was working till then. He was linked to a consumer durable shop where he transported goodson his cycle rickshaw trolley. He earned Rs. 150 to Rs. 200 each day which was sufficient for thefamily.

Sharda says the problem started once he left the work due to his age. Her husband was notregular at work however this did not deter his demands. There remained shortage of food in thehouse and this led to fights. After all these Sharda took it to herself and decided to get out andstart working for addressing the needs of her children. Things are better now, her two sons studyin a private school and she is lucky that she has to bear the fees of only one child as the fees ofher elder son is borne by a local NGO Dakhsa Bharti.

Things would have had definitely been much better, had her husband shown more desire to workand support their family. Speaking of him she says that “I would have been more than happy hadhe would have had contributed even a little, regularly, but that is not to be! He last worked amonth back, that too when I asked him how am I going to do Chatta Puja without money? Hethen worked for 10-12 days and gave me Rs. 1000; then since he is sitting idle. He sees his wifeis running around so why shall he bother to take pain?”

Sharda adds “If he wants what he cannot do? He is not a woman that he needs to find workwithin four houses of neighborhood. He is free to undertake any work. If he wants he can workas casual labourer in construction sites. But Alas! God knows why he does not have that sense!

If we compare the two cases of Ramashray and Lal Bahadur we can see that though the conditionof Ramashray was much more challenging in all aspects still he moved forward by hisachievement motivation and has relatively done much better despite of his physical handicapthan Lal Bahadur. While Lal Bahadur unlike Ramashray he is physically fit, his father alsosupported him much more than support Ramashray could get, his wife is also supportive, he hasskill of a carpenter still he lacks that motivation to achieve more than what he has and what he

Page 16: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

15

could. Hence achievement motivation is an intrinsic factor which would play a role in gettingreturns on this very important asset of poor households – The Human Capital.

AddictionAnother intrinsic factor which impacts the human capital negatively and is widely observable inurban slums is addiction.

“ Addiction is a condition that results when a person ingests a substance (e.g., alcohol, cocaine,nicotine) or engages in an activity (e.g., gambling) that can be pleasurable but the continueduse/act of which becomes compulsive and interferes with ordinary life responsibilities, such aswork, relationships, or health. Users may not be aware that their behavior is out of control andcausing problems for themselves and others” (Psychology Today, 2014).

Many poor households in urban slums of Varanasi face the consequences of substance abusedisorders and other addiction like gambling of their family members.

These addictions not only impacts the human capital adversely and diminishes the return on thisasset but also adversely affects other assets like intra-household relations and depletes socialrelations; leads to other prevalent problems like domestic violence, not willing to go to workregularly, deterioration in health or even death of addicts of substance abuse like alcohol, drugs,tobacco etc.

Thereby it further reduces the resilience of these urban poor households and makes them morevulnerable to different risks.

The most common and often most damaging substance abuse disorders results from alcoholabuse and dependence and further on abuse and dependence on drugs like Ganja(Cannabis/Marijuana) and Bhang (Cannabis/Hemp). In addition to these gambling is also widelyprevalent addiction. Mentioned addictions are mostly observed in adult men and in adolescentboys. The behavioural disorders out of these addictions also lead to other prevalent problems likedomestic violence, not willing to go to work regularly etc. Also the negative health implicationsof substance abuse like alcohol, drugs are well understood.Box 4.2.3 presents a case in which addiction diminishes returns on human capital and producesother complexities making the household vulnerable.

Page 17: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

16

Box 4.2.3 Addiction affecting returns on Human Capital: Case of Sarita Devi

Sarita Devi is around 30 years old and stays with her two children and husband in pasiana gali,near Kabeer math in Laharta area of Varanasi. Husband of Sarita is a casual laborer and workson daily wages in construction sites in the city. Sarita also worked earlier as a domestic help butshe had to leave that work as her children are quite young and needs to be attended personally byher as she fears that there is a risk of accident for them if they get to busy Varanasi-Allahabadroad which is quite close to their house. Hence Sarita’s husband remains the sole bread winnerfor the family. The family lives in their own one room semipucca house.With a decent wage rate and boom in construction activities in the city and a small family tosupport ideally things ought not to be that difficult for the family. However, unfortunately forSarita and her children it is not so. Their income is less and highly erratic.Sarita says about her husband “Sometimes he goes to work sometimes not. It could be 10-20days without work when I start quarreling then he moves. Today he has gone to look for somework, let me see if he gets some work, yesterday he returned back without work. Today, till nowhe is now not back…”

On further enquiry about this irresponsible behaviour it was learnt that Sarita’s husband isaddicted to Ganja (Marijuana/ Cannabis).Not only Saritas husband is reluctant to work and his income is low and erratic but also wastes agood chunk of his income on addiction.Due to this the family is pushed to the limit of bearing the trauma of going through hunger. Avisibly distressed Sarita admits that they do face situations when they have nothing to eat hunger,with stigma say “Yes, scarcity is there, you can see my child is forced to eat dry roti (chapatti)and salt, problem is there but what to do…? If I say this to someone, people would make fun ofme. Even If someone gives food they will taunt on us. Whom to share this helplessness with…?”

Thus we see that in this case addiction has not only diminished returns on this otherwiseproductive human capital of family head but also weakened the intra-household relations andsocial relations.

Intra-Household Relations

Better the relationship between different members of the household better the cohesion andsynergy. In urban context this asset gains even further importance as the urban poor settlementsare, in general, socially fragmented15. Though social relations still remains an important asseteven for urban poor households (discussed later).

15 Social Fragmentation: “The vulnerability of urban dwellers may also be high because community and inter-household mechanisms for social security are less likely to operate in urban than in rural areas.” (Moser, Gatehouse,& Garcia, 1996).

Page 18: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

17

Ceterius Paribus, A household in which intra-household relations are good are expected to bemore cohesive. Working in unison they are expected to achieve synergy and draw benefits ofachieving synergy.

Such households are expected to leverage better returns on their other assets as well thusincreasing their capabilities and further improving upon their chances of achieving livelihoodgoals, in comparison to those households which do not have good intra-household relations.

Also a household having a good intra-household relation would have a higher resilience. That isby staying together as a unit they gain capacity to cope up with risks in a better way as comparedto households with poor intra-household relations. the most important asset of the household-labour of lead male member(s) (discussed later in detail).

To highlight the importance of intra-household relations, case of Binda Devi is presented in Box4.2.4 presents case of Binda Devi which shows how a good intra-household relation can increasethe returns on meager assets a poor household has and also strengthen other assets of thehousehold.

Box 4.2.4 Intra-Household Relations - Case of Binda Devi

Binda Devi is around 40 years old and she lives in Nagwa slum of Varanasi city along with herhusband and three children. They reside in a small pucca house of their own. Binda is ahousewife and her husband works as a temporary worker in a cycle rickshaw repair workshopwhere he does repair works and mends puncture for cycle rickshaws. The family belongs toScheduled Caste category.

Despite of their limitations the family seems to be progressing well by working in synergy. Thisis reflected in the trust and achievements of the family in securing their livelihood and makingconscious efforts for strengthening their assets.

One of the major reasons for this positive leap of the family could be attributed to their goodintra-household relation. A good intra-household relation also leverages other assets whichpossess and this result into getting a good overall return on assets possessed by the family.

Binda Devi while talking about her husband she says that “He works hard, goes to work daily.Leaves for work at 8 in the morning and comes for lunch at 2, goes again at 3 and comes back at8 PM.

Work is available to him on a regular basis, and he takes no holidays and goes to work for all 30days. He earns something between Rs. 3000 to Rs. 4000 per month; and in any case he bringshome not less than Rs. 3000 per month”.

Page 19: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

18

Case of Binda Devi Contd…

The environment of the household is amicable; there is no problem of addiction. Binda says herhusband is not addicted to either alcohol or any other substance. They do not quarrel too muchnor is there any problem of domestic violence.

On the issue of educating their children Binda affirms “Yes, will educate them to the point weare capable. My husband had no options but to work with hammer, repair punctures etc. will notlet children do that, now what happens ahead is Gods wish”. All the three children study inMahamana Madhyamik School in the city. The family spends Rs. 950 in school fees per month.

The family has unfortunately been left out of BPL list of Food and Civil supplies of Govt. of U.Pand hence is not a beneficiary of TPDS (Targeted Public Distribution System) scheme. Howeverthe family has been successful in mobilising its social relations, more particularly its kinshipnetwork, to its benefit. Binda Devi says “Though we are poor, my brothers in Bihar are relativelywell-off, they are farmers and they give us Rice and wheat for our consumption. My Sister isalso in good condition, she helps me financially and otherwise”.

Commitment, sincerity and sensibility16 of the female lead17 of household

There is overwhelming evidence from the field observations that the Commitment and sincerityof the female lead of household towards her children and family is one of the strongest bindingforces which binds a poor household as a unit, and is an asset for an urban poor household, whileher sensibility towards handling relations inside and outside her family helps to build intra-household relations and social relations for the household.

This has been observed as one of the most consistent asset with any poor household wherefemale lead is present. This vital intangible asset of urban poor households has not been properlyacknowledged in the literature.

To help understand this; a case of a female household head Manju; which despite of loss of herhusband and multiple vulnerabilities is committed to support her children and take them out ofall odds. This case has been enumerated as Box 4.2.5

16 Sensibility:c. Capacity to feel;d. Susceptibility, sensitiveness (to); delicacy of feeling (Great Encyclopaedic Dictionary, 1964).

17 Female lead here means: wife of the male household head or a female leading a household.

Page 20: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

19

Box 4.2.5 Commitment and sincerity of the female lead of household – Case of Manju Devi

Manju Devi, aged around 40 yrs heads her family of five children; 3 sons and 2 daughters, theeldest child is 15 years old son and the youngest child is 6 years old daughter. The householdbelongs to Scheduled Caste category.

The family is still in agony of losing its head, three months back, owing to his liver and kidneyailment. Manju’s husband worked as a mason.Presently, Manju with her 5 children stays at her mother’s house in Nagwa, Varanasi along withfamilies of her two married brothers and a sister. Manju with her family has permanently shiftedto this place. She narrates:“My husband’s house is in chitaipur, Varanasi, my mother-in-law happened to be a step motherto my husband, her behavior was too hostile and I could not adjust there. Taking note of this, myfather, who was then alive, brought us back, now unfortunately he also has passed away …”

Loss of her husband, major contributor to household’s income and loss of control on one ofthe most important physical asset- her house at her husband’s place, has left her and herchildren at loss.

After passing away of her husband Manju is the lone bread earner for her family of six. Sheworks as a domestic help and earns Rs. 2000 per month. Also she puts up a mobile stall (thela) tosell boiled eggs, Omelets etc. during the evening time. On an average she earns Rs. 50 per dayout of this.

She says “I do not bother my son too much so that he can concentrate on his studies”.Her children goes to school, the eldest son is a student of class 9th in a private school where sheneeds to pay a fees of Rs. 300 per month. Her youngest daughter goes to Anganwadi.

Her other three children are supported for education by a faith based NGO Ashray Charitable(Christian Missionary), which gives free primary education and supports further in gettingadmissions in other schools and paying their fees till class twelve.

When asked about her future plans Manju replies with a deep sigh, “Will have to do somethingor else condition for begging will come, presently only three months have passed away, myhusband died; let me see ..., I wish I could get some better work, through which I can take propercare of my children...”

Page 21: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

20

Social Relations: An asset for urban poor households

Though as compared to the rural, the urban settlements are rather socially fragmentednonetheless, social relations still is one of the biggest assets of the urban poor. It is this safety neton which they fall upon at time of crisis and also draw security to reduce their vulnerabilities toseveral risks.In the studied context, and also in general, unfortunately not many institutions and outsideinterventions are poor-friendly. This limits the access of the urban poor to these institutions andits benefits. Hence at the time of requirement it is their social relationship networks, in whichthey have invested, comes to their support, more often than not. It is interesting to note here that,in same community, two households may have very different quality and quantity to this asset. Itwould depend on household’s own conduct and its investment in such relations.In urban context, this asset may include relations with close friends and relatives, neighbouhoodand community people, employers of household members, and their society at large.Though it would not be right to rank different categories of social relations18 on basis of theirimportance, as on different occasions different category of the mentioned categories can comehandy. However, the field observation suggests that the network of close friends and relatives, ingeneral, are the most reliable and exploited network on which an individuals and household canfalls upon.

In Figure 4.2.2, an attempt has been made to visually represent the discussed social relations asan asset. If we consider an individual to be the unit the first safety net for him is his family,followed by that there are multiple layers of social networks for him which could act as hissafety net at the time of crisis depending on his claims on these networks which in turn woulddepend on his own capability, accesses to these and investment made on these relations andnetworks.

18 Categories of social relations: Categorised here for convenience as relations with close friends andrelatives, neighbours and community people, employers of household members, and their society atlarge.

“How can I say that help is not required? When I have nothing, I will take something from others to

feed my family and myself. I take help from my neighbours and return back to them after earning from

work. This is a mutual thing, when he requires, I will help, when I need he will help, if my neighbour

has nothing to eat and is forced to remain hungry; this is not going to happen…; if he does not have… I

will support him, if there is no money with me as well; will get them food from my house. I will not

watch remaining idle, my neighbour sleep empty stomach”.

Shyama, Mason, Nagwa Slum, Varanasi

Page 22: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

21

Box 4.2.6 The Free Lunch: Case of Collateral-Security Free Loans from MFIs

That ‘elusive Free Lunch’ is every one’s desire; easiest to fantasise, so very difficult to get…

One such elusive free lunch for urban poor has been the idea to get collateral-security free loan,which would solve so many problems for them!

Traditional main stream financial institutions and banks, in general, give loan against mortgageof some physical assets or against assets which could easily be liquidated to cash. In want ofsuch assets, formal banking and financial institutions have largely remained inaccessible to poor.Several Government schemes, by undertaking guarantee on behalf of poor, have promiseddelivering that elusive free lunch (collateral free loan); but its inherent cumbersome processes,delays, corruption, and institutional insensitivity have ensured that this elusive free lunch forpoor remains eluded forever.

Figure 4.2.1 : Visual Representation of Social Relations as an Asset

Source: Author’s creation based on field data

To further validate Commitment, sincerity and sensibility of the female lead of household andSocial Relations as an asset of urban poor households another case – “The Free Lunch: Case ofCollateral-Security Free Loans from MFIs” is presented in Box 4.2.6

21

Box 4.2.6 The Free Lunch: Case of Collateral-Security Free Loans from MFIs

That ‘elusive Free Lunch’ is every one’s desire; easiest to fantasise, so very difficult to get…

One such elusive free lunch for urban poor has been the idea to get collateral-security free loan,which would solve so many problems for them!

Traditional main stream financial institutions and banks, in general, give loan against mortgageof some physical assets or against assets which could easily be liquidated to cash. In want ofsuch assets, formal banking and financial institutions have largely remained inaccessible to poor.Several Government schemes, by undertaking guarantee on behalf of poor, have promiseddelivering that elusive free lunch (collateral free loan); but its inherent cumbersome processes,delays, corruption, and institutional insensitivity have ensured that this elusive free lunch forpoor remains eluded forever.

Figure 4.2.1 : Visual Representation of Social Relations as an Asset

Source: Author’s creation based on field data

To further validate Commitment, sincerity and sensibility of the female lead of household andSocial Relations as an asset of urban poor households another case – “The Free Lunch: Case ofCollateral-Security Free Loans from MFIs” is presented in Box 4.2.6

Society at large

Employer

Neighbours andCommunity People

Close Friends &Relatives

Family

Individual

21

Box 4.2.6 The Free Lunch: Case of Collateral-Security Free Loans from MFIs

That ‘elusive Free Lunch’ is every one’s desire; easiest to fantasise, so very difficult to get…

One such elusive free lunch for urban poor has been the idea to get collateral-security free loan,which would solve so many problems for them!

Traditional main stream financial institutions and banks, in general, give loan against mortgageof some physical assets or against assets which could easily be liquidated to cash. In want ofsuch assets, formal banking and financial institutions have largely remained inaccessible to poor.Several Government schemes, by undertaking guarantee on behalf of poor, have promiseddelivering that elusive free lunch (collateral free loan); but its inherent cumbersome processes,delays, corruption, and institutional insensitivity have ensured that this elusive free lunch forpoor remains eluded forever.

Figure 4.2.1 : Visual Representation of Social Relations as an Asset

Source: Author’s creation based on field data

To further validate Commitment, sincerity and sensibility of the female lead of household andSocial Relations as an asset of urban poor households another case – “The Free Lunch: Case ofCollateral-Security Free Loans from MFIs” is presented in Box 4.2.6

Page 23: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

22

Free Lunch: Case of Collateral-Security Free Loans from MFIs contd...

However this Micro Finance Institutions (MFIs), with its advent turned the problem on its head.Their processes are more poor-friendly, instead of the poor coming to them MFIs reach on to

them, keep that ‘intimidating paper work’ to the minimal, form groups of women and give them‘collateral free loans’, to be repaid in relatively easier installment and what not! Further to makeit more mystical, even the fears of traditional banking institutions that loans without collateralsecurity would end up as bad loans, have also not come true for MFIs. MFIs enjoy much betterrepayment rate than traditional banking and financial institutions; resulting into healthy profitsfor them.

So has that ‘elusive free lunch’ of ‘collateral free loans’ been finally delivered to the poor?

The age old wisdom says, there is no such thing as a free lunch and the idea of getting somethingfor nothing is bond to remain elusive ever!

So then what is that which these MFIs are holding as collateral security? Definitely not physicalassets! Then what?

If we take a deeper look into lending criteria of MFIs; as a case for that matter, of MFIsoperational in Varanasi city, we find the following:

MFIs here,• Lend only to women and not to men

• Of women in a locality, lend only to those women, who are permanent residents of that placeand have a house of their own.

• Lend not singly but in group, the women members of the group must be known to each otherand would be from same locality.

• Unmarried women cannot be part of this group.

• If a women borrower of the group defaults on repayment, then the entire group would bepenalized for that.

An analysis of the aforementioned lending criteria indicates that MFIs have been much smarterthan traditional lending institutions. They have identified and have held two intangible assets of aborrower’s household as collateral security against lending made. These assets are:

a. Social relations of the householdb. Sensibility of the women-lead towards social relations.

Social relations are much worthy an asset for a poor household to be lost. Sensibility andsensitivity of women-lead, who is directly accountable for mortgaging this valuable intangibleasset of the household- the social relations, would leave no stones unturned to protect and furthergrow it. No wonder the repayment rates are extraordinary for MFIs!

Page 24: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

23

Physical Assets

The key physical assets possessed by poor households in Varanasi city are as follows:

Housing

House is one of the biggest assets any urban poor household can own. Though it is very difficultfor urban poor households to buy property in urban locations owing to their meager incomes andhigh price levels, yet poor households which are original inhabitants of a place or would havesettled much earlier on Government lands and later on the land titles got transferred in theirnames do own small land and house titles of their own.

The context of Varanasi is bit different as the sample statistics suggests that 87 % of the poorhouseholds do have legal rights on their land and houses. The reason which could be attributed tomajority of urban poor households possessing house and land titles here in Varanasi is that thepresent-day slums were once villages19 which have got engulfed by expanding city and that themajority of present day slum dwellers are original inhabitants of this place.; this could well be arepresentative case for similar cities. However owing to ever escalating property rates many havesold their land and house and have left the place and those who remain, remains vulnerable to thetemptation to sell off their property and get a wholesome amount in return.

Though the houses in which the poor reside are mostly semi-pucca or pucca, their conditions arenot good in general, most of these are single room houses, which is very small in size, has nocross ventilations, no proper flooring, no space to accommodate toilets, no running water facilityand many a times are in a dilapidated condition20; still owning a house is worth an asset to haveas this adds to resilience of households which results in reducing their vulnerability to a greatextent.

The house not only is an productive physical asset which may give an option of earning rent tothe owners or carrying out any economic activity in its premises; but also even if earning rent

19 The slums being villages in the past is acknowledge during the key Informant Interviews (KII) and FocussedGroup Discussions (FGDs) with elder members and also is reflected in the names of many slums which carry aname Purwa towards the end, like Shiv Purwa the term purwa in local language means village and also thisinformation is supported by the fact that still the inhabitants of the slum refer their slums as village in theirdiscussions and conversations and also the settlement pattern shows settlement of mostly same caste households inentire slum.20 Field observation suggests that many of the poor households have got benefitted from state Government’s lowcost housing schemes. Mainly houses built under Kansi Ram Awas yojna were seen wherein the beneficiaries wererequired to payback a sum of Rs. 17,400 in installments of Rs. 500 once the pucca house was complete. Howeverthe beneficiaries of this scheme complained about the poor quality of construction done under the scheme.

Page 25: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

24

from this asset is not possible it saves rent for the owners which they would have paid otherwisein absence of this asset but also it strengthens the identity21 of asset owners.

The urban poor households which have house of their own would continue to reside in the samelocality for a very long period which means they get an opportunity to build social relationswhich is one of the key assets and more often than not is the only safety net for the poor. Alsobeing a permanent resident of place would mean that it would open up door for undertaking othereconomic activities like home-based business. It is learnt from field interviews that in home-based business generally the raw material is provided by the business owners subcontractingtheir work and that the raw material is generally provided on trust which means that there is agreat likelihood that preference would be given to permanent residents as compared to peopleresiding as tenants. Also there are other occupations like driving where preference would begiven to local permanent residents over those who may migrate at very short notice. Also thisprivilege of being a permanent resident paves way and makes it relatively easier to draw manyother institutional supports like accessing Government’s social security schemes such as low costhousing scheme, Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS), old age pension scheme orunemployment allowance, etc. Also it makes the household eligible for getting a loan from aMicro Finance Institution (MFI). Also it makes it easier to get the benefit of other Governmentschemes like or getting listed in voter list or opening up of a bank account and much more.

Mobile Phone

Mobile phone as an asset of poor looks rather unusual. However with the turn of the millenniumthis is one of the most powerful Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tool whichthe urban poor has got access to.

Availability of low cost handsets combined with low cost pre-paid schemes by service providers,starting as low as recharge vouchers of Rs. 5 onward, has made mobile phones accessible tourban poor.

The field study revealed that mobile phones are increasingly being used by urban poor men andwomen and has achieved a good penetration within the urban poor households in the city. As perthe sample statistics, as high as 97% of the households have at least one or more mobile phones.The rapid growth and high penetration of mobile phones in India, in general and specifically inurban locations are also revealed by secondary data.

21 Identity: The distinctive characteristic of a person’s character or the character of a group which relate to who theyare and what is meaningful to them. Some of the main sources of identity include gender, nationality or ethnicity,social class. (NCERT, 2006)

Page 26: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

25

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI , 2014) in its latest press release on TelecomSubscription Data stated that there were 935 Million wireless telephone subscribers in India ason 31 October 2014 of which 549 Million (59% of the total) were urban subscribers which isgrowing further at a monthly growth rate of 0.20% . While the urban Tele-density22 for wirelessphones was 142.44.

Also as per Ericsson Mobility Report (2014) for the first time, India has overtaken China in netaddition of mobile subscribers. In January to March quarter of 2014 India added 28 millionmobile users, while China’s subscriber base increased only by 19 million (Ericsson, 2014).

Not only mobile phones are the most powerful tool for communication and to remain connectedbut also it is increasingly being used as an entertainment device. Through mobile phones FMradio can be tuned-in; also at low cost the memory chip can be loaded and re-loaded with videos,audios, pictures and what not; also internet could also be accessed through phones.

However above all, possession and usage of mobile phones by poor is a big leap forward madeby them in the ICT world and thereby they are progressing in the right direction to ensure thatthey don’t lag behind in this digital and add to their vulnerability by being victim of digitaldivide.

Already experimentations are being done in the direction of enabling poor through in-timeinformation dissemination and other interventions using mobile phones which would result inbringing more transparency and information sharing efficiencies related to be it governance ormarkets.

Also facilities of mobile-money transfers, added by all leading service providers like Airtel’sAirtel money or Vodafone’s m-Pesa or Idea’s Idea money etc. have definitely added aninnovative financial channel which is expected to benefit the poor as well.

Other Productive Physical AssetsMany urban poor households also possess physical assets like Thela23/ Cycle Rickshaw/ Cyclecarts etc. this gives an option of availing livelihoods through these assets or renting it out.

Also few households rear livestock, especially goats. The herd size is very small (1-3) and thisasset is looked upon more as an asset which can be easily liquidated at the time of crisis. Theherd size is kept small due to space constraint and also to lower the opportunity cost of rearinggoats, such that the available goat gets fed by kitchen waster and by self grazing and manpoweris not consumed for that.

22 Tele-density is a measurement of how many telephones are available, expressed as the number of telephone linesfor every 100 people in a country (Macmillan Publishers Limited, 2009)23 Thela: Four wheeled hand cart

Page 27: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

26

4.3. Vulnerability of the Urban Poor

“Shocks keep coming always”.

An elderly man, Lahartara, Varanasi

The aforementioned statement by a respondent in field interview suitably states howvulnerability is an integral part of an urban poor household. The urban poor households live andsurvive in an environment which is dynamic and ever changing, thus posing new challenges andpresenting new opportunities to them. In this process of synchronisation and adjustments ofhouseholds to their contexts they are confronted with multiple risks and shocks. The householdsremain vulnerable to these risks and shocks; further, there are internal and external factors whichaffect the vulnerability of households to these risks and shocks they are exposed to.

Major factors which have its bearing on the vulnerability of the urban poor households are theinternal capacity 24 of the household and the intensity and risks and shocks to which thehousehold is exposed to.

Lower the capacity of the household higher the vulnerability of the household and vice-versa.While the vulnerability to risks would depend on exposure to the risk and how effectively therisk has been managed. Higher the magnitude and exposure to risk more vulnerable thehousehold would be and more ineffective the risk management more vulnerable the householdwould be.

Also institutions (Social, Non-Govt. & Govt.) have a role to play more poor friendly andefficient the institutions it would add to the resilience of the households.

The terms related to risk and vulnerability has been used with difference in literature. To avoidconfusion the definitions and the meaning of these terms for the purpose of this thesis is beingadopted from “World Development Report 2014: Risk and Opportunity—Managing Risk forDevelopment”.

Table 4.3.1 presents the meaning of important terms related to Risk Management.

24 Capacity: Used in this thesis in context of individual household’s capacity to build and protect their livelihoods.Thus could be defined as: “The combination of all the strengths, attributes and resources available within ahousehold that can be used to achieve agreed goals” Adopted from (UNISDR, 2009).

Page 28: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

27

Table 4.3.1 Risk Terminology

Risk The possibility of loss. It can be imposed from outside or taken on voluntarily inthe pursuit of opportunities.

Shock A change in the world that may be positive or negative that may occur gradually orsuddenly.

Vulnerability A high susceptibility to loss from negative shocks resulting from a systemsexposure, internal conditions and risk management.

Resilience The ability of a person or system to recover from negative shocks while retainingor improving their functioning.

Risk Management The process that involves confronting risks, preparing for them (ex ante riskmanagement) and coping with their effects (ex post risk management).

Systemic Risk Risk that is common to most members of an entire system.

Idiosyncratic Risk Risk that is specific to some members of a system.

Source: The World Bank. (2013). World Development Report 2014: Risk and Opportunity -Managing Risk for Development. Washington D.C.

Vulnerability Profile of the Urban Poor Households in Varanasi City

By analyzing the pattern and implying case study method of qualitative data obtained through

field research a vulnerability profile of urban poor has been drawn. By vulnerability profile, it is

meant here, risks and shocks to which the urban poor households are exposed to; the external and

internal factors: which exposes the urban poor households to these risks and shocks; the internal

factors depleting the capacity of the households making them further susceptible to the risks and

shocks to which they are exposed to, the impact of risks not managed well, making the

household further vulnerable.

The vulnerability profile of urban poor households has been presented here in form of Tables

4.3.2 to 4.3.4.

Page 29: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

28

Table 4.3.2 Shocks faced by the Urban Poor Households.

Shocks facedby HHs

Description

Healthshocks

One of the biggest shocks faced by urban poor households. Health shock could beidiosyncratic or covariate and may result from many factors including a pandemic,hazardous environment, occupational hazard, accidents, seasonality etc. A health shockcould lead to premature death, chronic Illness, permanent disability, temporary disabilityetc.

IncomeShocks

Income shock is one of the biggest shocks that an urban poor household face. Income shockcan occur due to many factors like health shocks, death of an unavailability of work,seasonality, etc.

Weathershocks

Flooding in low lying areas due to excess rains ; water logging in rainy season due poordrainage; Heat Stress; work not available due to seasonality

FoodInflation

Rising food prices

Other Violence, threat or nuisance by Gangs; Theft etc.

Table 4.3.3 Exposure to systemic inefficiencies leading to increased vulnerability

Shocks having roots in systemic inefficiencies

Mar

kets

Income Shockshaving roots in LabourMarkets

Poor terms oftrade

Poor terms of trade leading to low wages despite ofworking hard, owing to labour market imperfections .

Unavailabilityof regularwork

Unavailability of work in organised sector.Unorganised workers like casual workers like mason ora labourers survive on daily basis if work is notavailable to them regularly this leads to ErraticIncome and even if the wages have improved theoverall income remains low depending on thefrequency of availability of work.

Missing Markets for Poor

FinancialServicesmarket

Non-existent formal banking channels providingsavings, credits etc., focusing on the needs poor.

InsuranceMarket

Missing Market

Other marketslike housing

Missing Market

Page 30: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

29

Shocks having roots in systemic inefficienciesP

ublic

Sys

tem

s

CorruptionCorruption of Govt. authorities robbing of the potential benefits ofGovt. schemes and benefits due to the poor

Unplanned Growth

UnplannedSettlements

Poor generally settle down in discarded areas- lowlying, besides open polluted drains etc. also theyremain outside the ambit of urban planning there bymissing out its benefit. This mushroomed squattersettlements on discarded lands, very close tosettlements to roads etc. leads to multiple hazards.

Lack of basicamenities

Lack of basic amenities like water, drainage, toilets,electricity adds to stress, consumes valuable time &energy and increased risk of diseases.

Improper WasteManagement

PollutedOpen RainWater Drains

Open rainwater drains polluted through unauthoriseddischarge of domestic and industrial solid and liquidwastes; waste water logging due to lack of properdrainage

Solid wastePollution solid waste dumping .pollution owing togarbage dumping and lack of cleanliness

Environmental pollution Climate change, Air pollution, noise etc. beyond safe limits.

Soci

al S

yste

ms

Girl's Marriage

Getting Daughter or sister married is a huge economic and socialliability on head of the family owing. Economic cost is owing toprevalence of dowry system and could leave the household in hugeindebtedness.

ShradhThe surviving heir has to feed people and give away dans (donations);for poor this could be huge economic cost and could lead toindebtedness.

Maintaining Kinship &festivals

Maintaining kinship network is important to maintain the socialrelations. Expenditures like giving gifts in marriages of relatives,helping relatives at time of need etc. Also expenditures on food, clothetc. during festivals.

Social Liabilities creating shocks for households: Though it withers the household ofeconomic assets and may end up in dragging the household in indebt it adds positively to thesocial relations of the household and keeps it alive in the social network.

Table 4.3.4 presents impact of risks not managed effectively resulting in turn into furtherweakening the capacity of the households making them more vulnerable to several risks &shocks.

Page 31: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

30

Table 4.3.4 Impacts of risks not managed effectively

Impact of Shocksnot managed

effectivelyDescription

Death- Loss ofhuman asset

Human capital is one of the biggest assets with the urban poor households andpremature death of family members specially earning members due to health shocksor accident is catastrophic and could have devastating effect on the household.

Sale of PhysicalAssets

Many a times in order to cope-up with some shock the poor household may end-uplosing some key assets like selling their house or other liquid assets like gold ormortgaging gold and not able to pay the debts and loosing the collateral. These mayhelp in at that instant to cope up with the shock but in long run makes the householdeven more vulnerable.

Income Related

Erratic IncomeShock like unavailability of regular work or loss of job or other idiosyncraticfactors like health shocks, or alcoholism or low achievement -motivation etc. couldlead to Erratic income and ultimately to low income.

Low IncomeLow wages owing to poor terms of trade and market imperfections could lead to lowincome.

Savings & Investment Related

Low / NoSavings

Low income compounded with addictions and unavailability of banking services ofpoor friendly saving schemes would end up in to No savings/ Low savings urbanpoor households.

Inability to invest

Inability to keep investing in human capital continually beyond the bare minimum,limits the quality and quantity of the returns on this very important asset of the urbanpoor, example not able to pursue studies despite of wish to continue.This is also the case for other assets as well. And this is linked to low savings andhence low capital formation.

Coping mechanisms of the poor running the risk of deepening the vulnerability

Indebtedness

Taking debts is one of the most effective coping strategy for the poor. However itmay also at times endup making the household more vulnerable as due to theirlimited capacity the household may remain regularly under debt; loosing potentialsavings in paying interests for of debt and also they would be in risk of falling intodebt trap.

Sale of PhysicalAssets

Many a times in order to cope-up with some shock the poor household may end-uplosing some key assets like selling their house or other liquid assets like gold ormortgaging gold and not able to pay the debts and loosing the collateral. These mayhelp in at that instant to cope up with the shock but in long run makes the householdeven more vulnerable.

Other ImpactsPoor Intra-HouseholdRelations

Poor Household Relations, lack of trust resulting into the family not working as a unit

Poor SocialRelations

Poor Social Relations resulting in weakening the most reliable safety net for any poorhousehold thus makes the household further vulnerable to risks and shocks.

Food ScarcityFood Scarcity at household level is one of the bottom-line impacts of overlappingvulnerabilities towards many shocks and impacts of shocks like Food inflation, lowincome, erratic income etc.

Page 32: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

31

4.4. Livelihood Strategies of the Urban Poor Households

“Will keep my family small… one child (family) is small”.

A Muslim street vendor (An expecting Father), Varanasi

“Do not need any more children. I pray, even if I am able to make my children live, feed andeducate, I am satisfied, giving birth to a child is not enough, cost of living is going up,

arrangements for feeding and educating them is required. Want only that many children whichwe can nurture”.

A construction worker in Nagwa Slum, Varanasi(Who lost his young child of disease)

In literature livelihood strategy has been defined as:

“A Range and combination of activities and choices that people make/undertake in order toachieve their livelihood goals (including productive activities, investment strategies,reproductive choices, etc.)” (DFID, 1999).

Drawing from Sen’s capability approach and from definition of strategy given by Michel Porter,the Strategic Management Guru (Porter, 1996), an alternate definition of Livelihood strategyadopted by households has been put up as:

“Expanding Human Capability25, choosing different set of activities”

Thus, implicit in an effective livelihood strategy of a household is planning and undertakingactivities to build and enhance its capability. A Livelihood Strategy is essentially somethingwhich is more proactive and not reactive. It is not a coping mechanism but rather a well thoughtoff action in advance.

25 Human Capability: Focuses on the ability of human beings to lead lives they have reason to value and to enhancethe substantive choices they have (Sen, Editorial: Human Capital and Human Capability, 1997).

Page 33: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

32

The field research revealed that:

Investing in its Human Capital is a definite livelihood strategy being adopted by the urbanpoor households.

Three parameters looked into were Family size, Vaccination of young children and sendingchildren to school. It was revealed that the urban poor households are:

- Limiting their family sizes.

- Vaccinating their young children.

- Sending children to schools (Pvt. Schools preferred over Govt. schools to get a better

quality of education).

Page 34: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

33

5. Conclusion and Recommendations

Revisiting one of the basic questions: Where does the lever to alleviate urban poverty lie? Thisresearch comes to a conclusion that there is no one masterstroke which can remove the urbanpoverty, reduce vulnerability of the poor, improve upon their livelihoods etc. but instead we haveto look for many small actions or levers which can strengthen the assets of the poor and add totheir capacity and hence to their resilience. Also, helping gain access to present institutions(including markets) and developing poor friendly institutions (both formal and informal) arerequired as a good institution can act an interface which can increase the returns on the assets ofthe urban poor households, when they interact with these institutions, to get transmuted tolivelihood outcomes. Together, high quality and quantity of assts and access to institutions couldbe effective in reducing the vulnerability of the urban poor households.

Also, identification of these aforesaid small levers alleviate poverty could be very contextual,and hence any urban poverty alleviation programme should definitely take in to account thecontextual requirements based on proper study.

Recommendations:

The recommendations of this research revolves around strengthening of assets, improving accessto institutions and developing poor friendly institutions26 and initiatives to improve upon theReturns on Assets of the poor, mitigate their risks and reducing their vulnerability. Therecommendations of this research are as follows:

Adding on new skills for Wage improvement

Providing incentives and facilitating for profit social enterprises to establish skill training centresor opening up of such centres through Government interventions. The vocation and curriculumshould be market guided and should have placement facility. Examples of such skill trainingcentres are:

- Opening up of Mason’s Training Centre:

Presently there is no formal intervention through which a construction labourer canmake a transition from labourer to become mason. The difference in the wages of alabourer and a mason is 75%. Hence mason training centre should be started. Thetrainee should get stipend equal to daily wages of a casual labourer.

26 Poor friendly institutions here means fulfilling of 2 conditions:a) The systems and subsystems should be one which is aligned to the habits of the poor.b) The poor should be at the core of activities and functioning.

Page 35: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

34

- Keeping in mind tourism industry: Driving schools, Waiters and chef trainingcentres, certified guides, sculpturing etc.

- Other vocational skill training centres for producing quality Electrician, plumbers,painter (as private construction sector is in boom); smart phone repair and handlingtraining etc.

Providing spring board facility for self employed and small enterprises- Recognising the services of poor self employed (like street vendors, rickshaw pullers,

petty shop owners etc.) and home-workers, giving them recognisation (like id cardsetc.) and support for their sustenance and growth instead of considering them ofnuisance and leaving them out of any planning initiatives.

- Providing access to cash credit to these self employed and home-workers throughcollateral free cash credit card. The risk of credit schemes could be covered bySIDBI.

Providing motivation training to adolescent and youths- Interaction with successful people with similar background.- Achievement motivation training, could be integrated with skill training courses.

Improving access to formal job marketsCases from the fields suggests that getting employed as a organised workers can helpsa poor household to break the poverty cycle, though in the present context access tosuch job markets are difficult. It cannot be ruled out that there are more number ofpoor in scheduled castes and that Govt. gives special quota to SCs which remainsunfilled many a times.

- Coaching to get govt. jobs, organised private jobs. Instead of opening up of coachingcentres, providing loans /reimbursing coaching expenditure receipts.

Financial Capital StrengtheningInterventions to be made through MFIs as their process procedures are more suited to poor.

- Giving consumption loans.- Giving productive assets in loan by hypothecating the asset itself.- Promoting daily collection saving schemes through door to door collections through

MFIs/ Regional Rural Banks/ Scheduled Commercial Banks. Starting erratic savingschemes, through mobile vans in same line as mobile ATMs. Time and location ofsuch vans identified and regular. Working like a mobile bank.

Page 36: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

35

Risk Mitigation- Improve the penetration, effectiveness and success of Rastriya Swasth Bima Yojna

(RSBY).- 100% coverage of subsidized housing schemes for all urban poor.- TPDS is a big help to the poor as it reduces the vulnerability of most poor HHs, better

targeting required, so that the eligible are not left out, multiple parameters should bedefined and identification to be done in a participatory way involving ULBs.

- Premium free life insurance all adults from age 18-60 Yrs.- In the same way as MFI runs on a business model, low cost quality housing should be

facilitated, there are existent Govt. schemes for housing but selection of beneficiary isnot a robust one, corruption and quality a big concern. Benefits flows to thosepolitically aligned. With change of Govts, the schemes drop dead, like Kanshi ramawas yojna.

Improving upon Household relationship- Sensitisation and strengthening of laws related to domestic violence.- Family counseling centre.- De-addiction centres.

Page 37: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

36

Bibliography

Adsul, R., & Kamble, V. (2008). Achievement Motivation as a Function of Gender, Economic Background and CasteDifferences in College Students. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology , 34 (2), 323-327.

Alwang, J., Siegel, P. B., & Jørgensen, S. L. (2001, June ). Vulnerability: A View From Different Disciplines. Social ProtectionDiscussion Paper Series No. 0115 . Washington D.C., U.S.A: Social Protection Unit, Human Development Network. The WorldBank.

Asian Development Bank. (2011). Understanding Poverty in India. Metro Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.

Babbie, E. (2008). THE BASICS OF SOCIAL RESEARCH. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Baharoglu, D., & Kessides, C. (2001). Urban Poverty. In T. W. Bank, PRSP Sourcebook (Vol. 2). Washington D.C.: The WordBank.

Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2012). Poor Economics. Noida, U.P: Random House India.

Bannock, G., Baxter, R., & Davis, E. (2004). Dictionary of Economics. London: The Economist in association with Profile BooksLtd.

Baulch, B., & Hoddinott, J. (2007). Economic mobility and poverty dynamics in developing countries. The Journal ofDevelopment Studies 36:6 , 1-24.

Beall, J., & Schuttle, S. (2006). Urban Livelihoods in Afghanistan. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU).

Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

Carsrud, A., & Brännback, M. (2011). Entrepreneurial Motivations: What Do We Still Need to Know? Journal of Small BusinessManagement , 9-26.

Carter, M. R. (2006). WHAT WE CAN LEARN FROM ASSET-BASED APPROACHES TO POVERTY. Global Economy andDevelopment. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.

Carter, P. M., & Barrett, C. B. (2006). The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: An asset-based approach. Journalof Development Studies, 42:2 , 178-199.

Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992, February). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century.Discussion Paper 296 . Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.

Coelho, K., & Maringanti, A. (2012). Urban Poverty in India Tools, Treatment and Politics at Neo-liberal Turn. Economic &Political Weekly , XLVII (47 & 48).

Collins. (2009). Collins cobuild advanced dictionary of English , Diotek DioDict (2005-10). Harper-collins.

Datt, G., & Mahajan, A. (2012). Datt & Sundaram Indian Economy. New Delhi: S. Chand & Company Ltd.

Datta, S., Mahajan, V., & Thakur, G. (Eds.). (2005). A Resource Book for Livelihood Promotion (2nd Edition ed.). Hyderabad:Basix, Indian School of Livelihood Promotion.

DFID. (1999, April). SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS GUIDANCE SHEETS . U.K: Department for International Development.

Dohmen, T. (2014, June). Behavioural Labour Economics: Advances and Future Directions. Discussion Paper Series . Bonn,Germany: Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA).

Ellis, F., & Freeman, H. A. (2005). Conceptual Frameworks and Overviews of Themes. In F. Ellis, & H. A. Freeman (Eds.),Rural Livelihoods and Poverty Reduction Policies (pp. 2-13). London: Routledge.

Ericsson. (2014). ERICSSON MOBILITY REPORT. Stockholm, Sweden: Rima Qureshi, Senior Vice President, Chief StrategyOfficer, Ericsson.

Page 38: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

37

Franzoni, D., & Logan, J. (2000). Gladiator (2000) movie script. Retrieved July 23, 2014, from Screenplays for You:http://sfy.ru/?script=gladiator_ts#maximusfirstfight

Government of India. (2012). Report of the expert group to Reccomend the Detailed Methodology for Identification of FamiliesLiving Below Poverty Line in Urban Areas. Planning Commission, Perspective Planning Division, New Delhi.

Government of India, Planning Commission. (2014). REPORT OF THE EXPERT GROUP TO REVIEW THE METHODOLOGYFOR MEASUREMENT OF POVERTY. New Delhi: Government of India.

Govt. of India, Planning Commission. (2013, July 22). Press Note on Poverty Estimates 2011-12. New Delhi, India.

Govt. of India, Planning Commission. (2012, March 19). Press Note on Poverty Estimation 2009-10. New Delhi, India.

Great Encyclopaedic Dictionary. (1964). The Reader's Digest Great Encyclopaedic Dictionary . London: The Reader's DigestAssociation Limited and Oxford University Press.

Haughton, J., & Khandker, S. R. (2009). Handbook on Poverty and Inequality. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

High Powered Expert Committee (HPEC) for Estimating the Investment Requirement for Urban Infrastructure Services. (2011).Report on Indian Infrastructure & Services. New Delhi: Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India.

Holzmann, R., & Jørgensen, S. (2000, February). Social Risk Management:A New Conceptual Framework for Social Protectionand Beyond. Social Protection Discussion Paper SeriesNo. 0006 . Washington D.C., U.S.A.: Social Protection Unit, HumanDevelopment Network, The World Bank.

Holzmann, R., Sherburne-Benz, L., & Tesliuc, E. (2003). Social Risk Management: The World Bank’s Approach to SocialProtection in a Globalizing World. Washington, D.C.: Social Protection Department, The World Bank.

JNNURM Directorate, M/O Urban Development & National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA). (2011). The India'sDemographic Transition - The 2011 Census Results (Provisional). New Delhi: National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA).

JNNURM Directorate, M/O Urban Development and National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA). (2011). India's DemographicTransition. New Delhi: JNNURM Directorate, M/O Urban Development and National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA).

Joyita. (2013, August 5). Poverty Estimation in India. Retrieved June 11, 2014, from The PRS Blog:http://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog/?tag=nsso

Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing Management (10th Edition ed.). New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.

Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology- A step by step guide for beginners (3rd Edition ed.). New Delhi: SAGE PublicationsIndia Pvt. Ltd.

Kundu, A. (2011, September). Trends & Patterns of Urbanisation in India. Urbanisation & Emerging Population Issues (6) .Human Settlements Group, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).

Kundu, A. (2006). Trends and Patterns of Urbanisation and Their Economic Implications. In India Infrastructure Report 2006(pp. 27-41). New Delhi: Oxford.

Lugt, S. V. (2011, October 18). staying together. Retrieved July 27, 2014, from Shawn Vander Lugt:http://shawnvanderlugt.com/2011/10/18/staying-together/

Macmillan Publishers Limited. (2009). teledensity definitions and thesaurus. Retrieved January 6, 2015, from MacmillanDictionary: http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/teledensity

Mckinsey Global Institute. (2010). India's urban awakening: Building inclusive cities, sustaining economic growth. Mckinsey &Company.

Moser, C. O. (2006). ASSET-BASED APPROACHES TO POVERTY REDUCTION IN A GLOBALIZED CONTEXT: Anintroduction to asset accumulation policy and summary of workshop findings. WASHINGTON, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Moser, C. O. (1998). The Asset Vulnerability Framework: Reassessing Urban Poverty Reduction Strategies. WorldDevelopment,, No. 1, , 26 (1), 1-19.

Page 39: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

38

Moser, C., & Meilwaine, C. (1997). Household responses to poverty and vulnerability. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Moser, C., Gatehouse, M., & Garcia, H. (1996). Urban Poverty Research Sourcebook Module I: Indicators Of Urban Poverty.Washington, D.C.: UNDP/UNCHS/The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/WORLD BANK/UMP.

Narayan, D. (2000). Voices of the Poor Can Anyone Hear Us? (Vol. I). New York: Oxford University Press for The World Bank.

NCERT. (2006). INTRODUCING SOCIOLOGY , TEXTBOOK FOR CLASS XI. New Delhi: National Council of EducationalResearch and Training.

NCERT. (2005). Psychology TEXTBOOK FOR CLASS XI. New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.

NCERT. (2007). Psychology TEXTBOOK FOR CLASS XII. New Delhi: Secretary, National Council of Educational Research andTraining.

NCEUS. (2007). Report on Conditions of Work and Promotion of Livelihoods In the Unorganised Sector. New Delhi: DolphinPrito Graphics for National Commission for Enterprises In the Unorganised Sector.

Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement Motivation: Conceptions of Ability, Subjective Experience, Task Choice, and Performance.Psychological Review , 91 (3), 328-346.

Owyang, J. (2013, January 14). The Difference between Strategy and Tactics. Retrieved July 27, 2014, from Web-strategist:http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2013/01/14/the-difference-between-strategy-and-tactics/

Panagariya, A., & Mukim, M. (2013, September). A Comprehensive Analysis of Poverty in India. Working Paper No. 2013-1 .New York: Program on Indian Economic Policies, Columbia University.

Patnaik, U. (2013). Poverty Trends in India 2004-05 to 2009-10. Economic and Political Weekly , XLVIII (40), 43-58.

Porter, M. E. (1996, November-December). What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review , 61-78.

Psychology Today. (2014). PSYCH BASICS. (K. Perina, Editor, A. Deutsch, Producer, & Sussex Publishers, LLC) RetrievedDecember 18, 2014, from Psychology Today: http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics

Rabideau, S. T. (2005, November). Effects of Achievement Motivation on Behavior. Retrieved August 14, 2014, from PersonalityResearch: www.personalityresearch.org/papers/rabideau.html

Rakodi, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. (Eds.). (2002). Urban Livelihoods: A People-centred Approach to Reducing Poverty. London:Earthscan Publications Limited.

Ravallion, M. (2002). On the Urbanisation of Poverty. Journal of Development Economics , 435-442.

Ray, D. (2009). Development Economics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. (2011). Provisional Population Totals, Urban Agglomeration & Cities, M/OHome Affairs. New Delhi, India.

Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. (2011, July 15). Rural Urban Distribution of Population ( ProvisionalPopulation Totals). New Delhi.

Roy, T. (2012). Bringing Economics back in labour history: A study of the historical patterns of labour supply in India. TheIndian Society of Labour Economics, 54th Annual Conference. Varanasi: Banaras Hindu University (BHU).

Salvator, D., & Diulio, E. A. (2003). Principles of Economics. (W. A. Bartley, Ed.) New York: McGRAW-HILL.

Scott, R. (Director). (2000). Gladiator [Motion Picture].

Sen, A. (2003). Capability and Well‐Being. Retrieved July 27, 2014, from OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE:www.oxfordscholarship.com

Sen, A. (1997). Editorial: Human Capital and Human Capability. World Development , Vol. 25, No. 12, 1959-1961.

Sen, A. (1999). Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Page 40: “Livelihoods of the urban poor: Case of Varanasi City in Uttar Pradesh in India”

39

Siegel, P. B. (2005). Using an Asset-Based Approach to Identify Drivers of Sustainable Rural Growth and Poverty Reduction inCentral America: A Conceptual Framework. The World Bank, Central America Environmentally and Socially SustainableDevelopment (ESSD) Department Latin America and the Caribbean Region (LAC) Rural Development Family. The WorldBank.

Siegel, P. B., & Alwang, J. (1999, October). An Asset-Based Approach to Social Risk Management: A Conceptual Framework.Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No.9926 . Washington D.C.: Social Protection Unit, Human Development Network,The World Bank.

Sivam, A. (2014). Policy Responses to Improve the Quality of Housing for the Urban Poor. Proceedingsof 17th InternationalSymposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (pp. 505-12). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Steering committee on urbanization, Planning Commission, Government of India. (2011). Report of the Working Group onUrban Poverty, Slums, and Service Delivery System. New Delhi.

Synchronisation. (n.d.). (WordNet® 3.0) Retrieved August 4, 2014, from Dictionary.com:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/synchronisation

Synergy. (n.d.). Retrieved July 30, 2014, from Dictionary.com: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/synergy

Synergy. (n.d.). Retrieved August 5, 2014, from BusinessDictionary.com:http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/synergy.html

Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Nouchi, R., Sekiguchi, A., Kotozaki, Y., & Miyauchi, C. M. (2012). Regional gray matter density isassociated with achievement motivation: evidence from voxelbased morphometry. Retrieved December 25, 2014, from Springer:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s0042901204853/

The World Bank. (2013). World Development Report 2014: Risk and Opportunity - Managing Risk for Development.Washington D.C.: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.

Thrash, T. M., & Hurst, A. L. (2008). Approach and Avoidance Motivation in the Achievement Domain:Integrating theAchievement Motive and Achievement Goal Traditions. In A. J. Elliot, Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation. NewYork: Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group.

TRAI . (2014, December 5). Highlights of Telecom Subscription Data as on 31st October, 2014. Press Release No. 80/2014 .New Delhi, India: Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India.

UNISDR. (2009). TERMINOLOGY ON DRR. Retrieved January 11, 2015, from Terminology UNISDR:http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs , Population Division. (2012). World Urbanization Prospects: The2011 Revision. New York: United Nations; Accessed from www.esa.un.org/unup on 7 July 2014.

Veroff, J. (1975, February). Varieties of Achievement Motivation. Retrieved December 20, 2014, from ERIC:files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED106737.pdf

WHO SEARO. (2004). Report on ORAL TOBACCO USE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS IN SOUTH-EAST ASIA. Retrieved January1, 2015, from searo.WHO: http://www.searo.who.int/tobacco/topics/oral_tobacco_use.pdf?ua=1

Wikipedia Contributors. (2014, July 14). Gladiator(2000 film). Retrieved July 19, 2014, from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gladiator(2000)