letter from chris mawson

3
This article was downloaded by: [University of California Davis] On: 22 October 2014, At: 10:15 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rpps20 Letter from chris Mawson Published online: 11 Aug 2006. To cite this article: (2001) Letter from chris Mawson, Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 15:2, 203-203, DOI: 10.1080/02668730100700141 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02668730100700141 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever

Upload: trinhkhuong

Post on 27-Feb-2017

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

This article was downloaded by: [University of California Davis]On: 22 October 2014, At: 10:15Publisher: RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T3JH, UK

Psychoanalytic PsychotherapyPublication details, including instructions forauthors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rpps20

Letter from chris MawsonPublished online: 11 Aug 2006.

To cite this article: (2001) Letter from chris Mawson, Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy,15:2, 203-203, DOI: 10.1080/02668730100700141

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02668730100700141

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of allthe information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on ourplatform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensorsmake no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy,completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinionsand views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views ofthe authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis.The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should beindependently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor andFrancis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings,demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever

or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, inrelation to or arising out of the use of the Content.

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private studypurposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution,reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any formto anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use canbe found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f C

alif

orni

a D

avis

] at

10:

15 2

2 O

ctob

er 2

014

Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy (2001 ) Volume 15 No. 2, 203

LETTER FROM CHRIS MAWSON

Dear Editor

I write as Co-Editor of the British Psychoanalytical Society Website, having received enquiries from psychotherapists, many of whom are UKCP-registered, expressing concern and puzzlement at the decision of the UKCP and its PPP section to allow those registering organisations which are members to allow their own members to choose to use the title Psychoanalyst in the Register, albeit denoted by an asterisk indicating that the matter is still being debated within the UKCP. This concern has not come solely from BCP members, and some enquiries have been received from abroad. The concern is that the UKCP itself, and therefore the psychotherapists themselves, will come into disrepute if they are seen by the public and by their professional colleagues to lay claim to a title that firstly has not been earned and secondly confuses them with another professional body. It has been pointed out to me that this would be in contravention of existing UKCP Ethical Regulations, in particular:

2.1 Qualifications: Psychotherapists are required to disclose their qualifications when requested and not claim, or imply, qualifications that they do not have.

My position in relation to such enquiries is that this new practice of self- certification is impossible to defend ethically and that it constitutes a funda- mentally dishonest way of managing anxieties associated with Statutory Registration. Without additional study, supervised training and accreditation by an superordinate training body, and not merely by a representational one such as the UKCP or BCP, how can a person claim retrospectively that a psychotherapy training was in fact a training in psychoanalysis? I would recommend to your readers that they learn all that they can about these developments and ask searching questions about the implications for the credibility of psychoanalytic psychotherapy in the UK.

Yours sincerely

CHRIS MAWSON Website Co-Editor, British Psychoanalytical Society

203

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f C

alif

orni

a D

avis

] at

10:

15 2

2 O

ctob

er 2

014