lecture 12 impacts of land use change. impacts of lcluc pattern/rates> causes> impacts>...
TRANSCRIPT
Lecture 12 Lecture 12
Impacts of Land Use Change Impacts of Land Use Change
Impacts of LCLUC Pattern/Rates> Causes> Impacts> Prediction• Direct and Indirect impacts• Immediate and delayed impacts • Temporary and permanent impacts• Positive and negative impacts• Biophysical and societal impacts
• How to quantify the impacts?
Example Impacts
• Biogeochemical Cycles– Carbon – Nitrogen
• Air Quality– Smoke, – Industrial pollution
• Water Cycle – Water Quality – Soil Erosion,
Sedimentation– Water Availability
• Land Productivity – Degradation,
Salinization, Desertification, Infestations and Disease
– Enhancement, Increase
Example Impacts
• Biodiversity– Species loss, extinction,
increase– Habitat loss or
fragmentation (wetlands)– Invasive species
• Societal Impacts – Human health (malaria,
pollution) – Local economics and well
being– Transportation -
congestion, pollution– Culture, societal structure
and governance
• Climate Impacts – Emissions – Global – Albedo and
Temperature – Water Cycle –
Regional Evaporation, Precipitation
2003 Heat Wave – more than 40,000 Europeans died. While there were contingency plans for a variety of natural and man-made catastrophes, high temperatures had never been considered a major hazard.
Human Health
Haze from fires is thick over the Indonesian island of Borneo.
GHG gases
Precipitation is enhanced by the transpiration and evaporation over the Brazilian rain forest. Deforestation removes this vital source of water for the atmosphere.
Climate Regulation
Hydrology & Water Quality
Dark patches in the Elizabeth River are signs of algae blooms, which can pose a lethal threat to other living things in the water.
Human HealthLand cover change in much of the southwest U.S. has resulted in new disease vectors such as those borne by mosquitos (e.g West Nile Virus)
Biodiversity
Habitat fragmentation and loss
Soil Fertility Sediment loss, nutrient run-off, salinization
Suburban encroachment on farmland alters the cultural landscape. In this scene a farmstead (center left) has been leapfrogged by a suburban development that abuts a cornfield (lower right).
California is the most important agricultural state in America California is the most important agricultural state in America and produces 42% of its fruit and 43% of its vegetablesand produces 42% of its fruit and 43% of its vegetables. • By 1960, already three million acres of high quality Californian farmland was lost to urban areas. • One third of the prime agricultural land was gone by 1980. • Predictions for the year 2020 show that more than fourteen million acres of the southern state's highest quality farmland will have disappeared
U.S. Corn Boom Has Downside for Gulf
Effects of land use, soils, and Effects of land use, soils, and human populations on export of human populations on export of water, C, N, and P from the Mid-water, C, N, and P from the Mid-Atlantic coastal plainAtlantic coastal plain
Thomas R Fisher
Horn Point Laboratory
University of Maryland-CES
NASA LCLUC Science Team meeting, 20-22 Jan 2004
Goals • Reconstruct land use history in the Choptank basin over
the last 150 years using maps, aerial photos, and Landsat imagery.
• Model rates of N and P export associated with the land use change.
What’s the significance of this chart? What are the likely effects?
Environmental Impacts
1. Water Quality: Nutrient, sediment, and bacterial contamination are critical water quality problems. Pesticides and other organic contaminants are also a concern.
2. Soil Quality: Soil quality concerns center on maintenance of soil tilth by preserving and sequestering carbon in soils.
3. Air Quality: Ammonia and odorous emissions from activities connected with poultry production and the associated challenges that arise from increasingly complex urban-rural interface are air quality concerns within the watershed.
4. Loss of wetlands and wildlife habitat: Historical loss of wetlands in the Upper Choptank River sub-watershed is large compared to similar Maryland watersheds.
5. Ecosystem health of the Chesapeake Bay: Low dissolved oxygen, low water clarity, health of submerged aquatic vegetation, and populations of oysters, clams, and blue crabs dominate the list of ecosystem health concerns.
Synthesis Land cover history controlled population growth
in the basin Agricultural conversion complete by 1800 Limited population density for 150 years (feedback) Service economy after 1950 increased density
Land cover change from 1665 to 2000 probably doubled losses of N and P from land to water
Small effect which would not have decreased water quality
However, land use intensity is the real driver of poor water quality (2-10x as much effect as land cover change)
Application of fertilizers to crop lands Human population density (waste disposal)
Land Use Change Around Protected Areas and Consequences for Biodiversity
P.I.: Andrew Hansen
Funding: NASA Land Cover Land Use Change Program
Greater Yellowstone
Conifer
Herb;Seed/sap
Urban
AgricultureHardwood
Fire, logging
Succession, encroachment
CRP
Land Cover/Use Change in GYE: 1975-1995
-17%
+348%
-9%
+4%
-46%
MxCon+90%
Mxhw-24%
Burned +4968%
GYE Rural Residential
Development
National Park ServiceOther federal landsCounty boundaries
Low HighCounties without home
density data
Home density
Bozeman
Rexburg
Pocatello
Idaho Falls
Billings
Jackson
Rural Homes
Population has increased 55% 1975-1995
Rural homes increased 108% 1975-99
Data SourceCounty tax assessor records validated
against aerial photographs
Site Total Area (km2)
Total % Converted
% Unprotected Lands Converted
% Remaining Habitat Found Outside Reserves
GYE 95,363 11 37 20
GYE: Loss of Wildland Habitats
Species Abundance/Hotspots Methods
Obtain data from field surveys of species abundances.
Develop statistical relationship with biophysical and land use predictors.
Use statistical relationship to extrapolate species abundance over the landscape.
Analyze spatial distribution of species abundance to prioritize conservation.
Predicted Bird
Hotspots
National Park ServiceOther federal landsCounty boundariesBiodiversity hotspotsunclassified
Bozeman
Rexburg
Pocatello
Idaho Falls
Billings
Jackson
Places where bird species richness and abundance are <60% of maximum
Hotspots cover 6.4% of area
Bozeman
Rexburg
Pocatello
Idaho Falls
Billings
Jackson
National Park ServiceOther federal landsCounty boundariesBiodiversity hotspotsBiodiversity modeling mask
Low HighCounties without home
density data
Home density
Bird Hotspots and Rural
Homes
% of hotspots on: Private land: 41%National Parks: 12.3%Hotspots overlap with:
•Rural homes
•Conifer expansion
•High fire risk
Avian richness > 60% of maximumGreater Yellowstone Area boundaryCounty boundariesYellowstone National Park
Low HighCurrent Home Density
Greater Yellowstone Area boundaryCounty boundariesYellowstone National Park
Predicted Rural Homes > 1, and Avian Richness > 60% of Maximum
Current Housing Density < Exurban,Predicted Housing Density > Exurban,and Avian Richness > 60% of Max.
Areas predicted to have high avian richness are also the same areas receiving the most pressure
from human land use: rural homes were disproportionately located close to avian hotspots.
Within areas of high avian biodiversity, those places that are currently undeveloped but have high future development potential should be considered high
priorities for future conservation efforts.
Criteria for Regional Management
• In Greater Yellowstone, low elevation population source habitats for birds have been converted to population sink areas due to rural home development.
• Consequently subpopulations in Yellowstone National Park are at increased risk of extinction.
• A major conclusion is that the viability of nature reserves can best be ensured by managing them in the context of the surrounding region.
Homework
• Reading and discussion – Hansen et al. (2005) – Effects of exurban
development on biodiversity patterns, mechanisms, and research needs, Ecological Applications
Source: Hansen et al., 2005
Tot
al #
of
spec
ies
dete
cted
Explain the curvilinear response