lean six sigma presentation

Upload: nvivekananthamoorthy

Post on 07-Apr-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    1/81

    Lean Six Sigma Tools

    ( A Collection )

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    2/81

    Acknowledgement

    Globalization and Technological advancements poses challenges andopportunities for business around the world. Comapnies have adapt to newsituations and change and improve their business processes to remaincompetetive in the market. Six Sigma and Lean Principles are tools used bycompanies around the world to attain operation excellence and improve theirbottom line by elimination defects and waste in their products and services . The

    collection of these slides from various sources introduce Six Sigma and LeanPrinciples and the tools used for their implementation. We acknowledge withthanks all contributions for using in this presentation on 'Lean Six Sigma Tools'.

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    3/81

    Lean Six Sigma

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    4/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    5/81

    How Six Sigma was born

    Bill Smith, a senior quality engineer at Motorola was working with a type ofcircuit board called a bay station board. The product had a much higherfailure rate than predicted, despite having been designed with meticulousattention. Smith came to realize that it was the accumulation of a lot of littledefects made during the manufacturing process not inherent design flaws that caused the high rate of early-life failures. Eliminating the source of thosedefects was therefore the only way the company could deliver higher quality to

    its customers.

    Smith also realized that the company needed a standard metric ofquality that could be used across all its manufacturing processes. With hisinnate zeal for perfection, he settled on a measure of variation sigma. Smithmet with Galvin in late 1985 to promote the notion of having a six sigmatolerance in terms of defects so that even shifts in process performance would

    not produce defects.After listening to Smith, Galvin directed Jack Germain, Motorolas firstcorporate vice president of quality, to build on Smiths ideas. And Six Sigmawas born. In 1987 the company trademarked the term, making it official.

    Everyone soon came to see that six sigma meant being near-perfect, saidMor.

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    6/81

    Corporate Commitment

    Motorola is committed to developing these leaders

    We provide these people with extensive training in statisticaland interpersonal tools, skilled guidance and management

    support

    Once their development has achieved a level worthy ofrecognition, we even have a term for those exceptionalindividuals :

    Six Sigma Black Belts

    Chris Galvin

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    7/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    8/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    9/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    10/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    11/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    12/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    13/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    14/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    15/81

    Distinguish Vital Few

    from Trivial Many

    Y = Dependent Variable Output, Defectx = Independent Variables Potential Causex* = Independent Variable Critical Cause

    Define the Problem /Defect Statement

    Y= f ( x1*

    , x2, x3, x4*

    , x5. . . Xn)

    Process

    (Parameters)

    Material

    Methods

    People

    Environment

    Output

    Machine

    Measurements

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    16/81

    Six Sigma as a Method

    Theimage cannotbe displayed.Your computer may nothaveenough memory toopen theimage, or theimagemay havebeen corrupted.Restartyour computer,and then open thefileagain. Ifthe red x stillappears,youmay havetodeletetheimageand then insertitagain.

    To get results, should we focus our behavior on the Y or X

    Y X1Xn

    Dependent Independent

    Output Input-Process

    Effect Cause

    Symptom Problem

    Monitor Control

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    17/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    18/81

    Eliminate Trivial ManyEliminate Trivial Many

    Qualitative Evaluation Technical Expertise Graphical Methods Screening Design of Experiments

    Qualitative Evaluation Technical Expertise Graphical Methods Screening Design of Experiments

    Identify Vital FewIdentify Vital Few Pareto Analysis Hypothesis Testing Regression Design of Experiments

    Pareto Analysis Hypothesis Testing Regression Design of Experiments

    Quantify

    Opportunity

    Quantify

    Opportunity % Reduction in Variation Cost/ Benefit % Reduction in Variation Cost/ Benefit

    Our Goal:

    Identify the Key Factors (xs)

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    19/81

    Graph>Box plot

    75%

    50%

    25%

    Graph>Box plot

    Without X values

    DBP

    Box plots help to see the data distribution

    Day

    DBP

    10

    9

    10

    4

    99

    94

    109

    104

    99

    94

    Operator

    DBP

    10

    9

    10

    4

    99

    94

    Shift

    DBP

    10

    9

    10

    4

    99

    94

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    20/81

    Statistical Analysis

    0.0250.0200.0150.0100.0050.000

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    0

    New

    c

    i

    e

    Freq

    uenc

    0.0250.0200.0150.0100.0050.000

    30

    20

    10

    0

    Mac

    ine6 mt

    s

    Frequenc

    Is the factor really important?

    Do we understand the impact forthe factor?

    Has our improvement made animpact

    What is the true impact?

    Hypothesis Testing

    Regression Analysis

    55453525155

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    X

    Y

    R-

    q =

    6.0

    Y = 2.19469 + 0.918549X

    95%

    I

    Regression

    Regression

    lot

    Apply statistics to validate actions & improvements

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    21/81

    Design of Experiments (DOE)Design of Experiments (DOE)

    To estimate the effects of independent Variables onResponses.

    TerminologyTerminology

    FactorAn independent variable

    Level A value for the factor.

    Response - Outcome

    X Y

    PROCESS

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    22/81

    Why use DoE ?Why use DoE ?

    Shift the average of a process.

    Reduce the variation.

    Shift average and reduce variation

    x1 x2

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    23/81

    CONTROL PHASE - SIX SIGMA

    Control Plan Tools:

    1. Basic Six Sigma control methods.- 7M Tools: Affinity diagram, tree diagram, process

    decision program charts, matrix diagrams,interrelationship diagrams, prioritization matrices,activity network diagram.

    2. Statistical Process Control (SPC)- Used with various types of distributions

    - Control ChartsAttribute based (np, p, c, u). Variable based (X-R, X)Additional Variable based tools

    -PRE-Control-Common Cause Chart (Exponentially BalancedMoving Average (EWMA))

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    24/81

    PRODUCTMANAGEMENT

    OVERALL

    GOAL OFSOFTWARE

    KNOWLEDGE OFCOMPETITORS

    SUPERVISION

    PRODUCT

    DESIGN

    PRODUCT

    MANAGEMENT

    PRODUCTDESIGN

    PRODUCTMANAGEMENT

    INNOVATION

    OUTPUT

    DIRECTORY

    ORGANIZATION

    INTUITIVEANSWERS

    SUPPORT

    METHODS TO MAKEEASIER FOR USERS

    CHARACTERISTICS:

    Organizing ideas into meaningfulcategories

    Data Reduction. Large numbers of qual.Inputs into major dimensions or categories.

    AFFINITY DIAGRAM

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    25/81

    MATRIX

    DIAGRAM

    Patientsche

    duled

    Attendantassigned

    Attendantarrives

    Obtainsequ

    ipment

    Transportsp

    atient

    ProvideThe

    rapy

    Notifiesofreturn

    Attendantassigned

    Attendantarrives

    Arrive at scheduled time 5 5 5 5 1 5 0 0 0 0

    Arrive with proper equipment 4 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0

    Dressed properly 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Delivered via correct mode 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0Take back to room promptly 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5

    IMPORTANCE SCORE 39 25 25 27 25 0 20 20 20

    RANK 1 3 3 2 3 7 6 6 6

    5 = high importance, 3 = average importance, 1 = low importance

    HOWS

    WHATS

    RELATIONSHIPMATRIX

    CUSTOMERIMPORTANCE

    MATRIX

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    26/81

    Motorola ROI1987-1994

    Reduced in-process defect levels by a factor of 200.

    Reduced manufacturing costs by $1.4 billion.

    Increased employee production on a dollar basis by 126%.

    Increased stockholders share value fourfold.

    AlliedSignal ROI

    1992-1996

    $1.4 Billion cost reduction.

    14% growth per quarter.

    520% price/share growth.

    Reduced new product introduction time by 16%.

    24% bill/cycle reduction.

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    27/81

    General Electric ROI

    1995-1998

    Company wide savings of over $1 Billion.

    Estimated annual savings to be $6.6 Billion by the year 2000.

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    28/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    29/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    30/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    31/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    32/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    33/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    34/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    35/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    36/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    37/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    38/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    39/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    40/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    41/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    42/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    43/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    44/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    45/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    46/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    47/81

    The normal Distribution

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    48/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    49/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    50/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    51/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    52/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    53/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    54/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    55/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    56/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    57/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    58/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    59/81

    Lean Manufacturing Tools

    Lean manufacturing tools are adapted to help businesses with the process ofbecoming lean. These tools include the following:

    Five S: The name derives from five Japanese words beginning with S. Thepurpose of this tool is to simplify your work environment, reduce waste, andimprove safety, quality, and efficiency.

    Kanban: This tool is used in pull systems as a signaling device to trigger action.Traditionally it used cards to signal the need for an item. It can trigger themovement, production, or supply of a unit in a production chain.

    Poka-yoke: This is a mechanism that helps an equipment operator avoidmistakes. Its objective is to eliminate product defects by preventing, correcting,or drawing attention to human errors as they occur.

    Heijunka: This is a system designed to level the production volume and

    production by product type. A heijunka boxis basically a board with boxes thatlays out times with cards that let employees know what they are doing at specifictimes during the production schedule.

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    60/81

    Crosby's response to the quality crisis was the principle

    of"doing it right the first time" (DIRFT). He would alsoinclude four major principles:

    the definition of quality is conformance to

    requirements

    the system of quality is prevention

    the performance standard is zero defects

    the measurement of quality is the price of

    nonconformance

    Crosby's prescription for quality improvement was a 14-

    step program. His belief was that a company thatestablished a quality program will see savings returnsthat more than pays off the cost of the quality program

    ("quality is free").

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    61/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    62/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    63/81

    y 5 Whys

    y Analysis of variance

    y ANOVA Gauge R&R

    y Axiomatic design

    y

    Business Process Mappingy Cause & effects diagram (also known as fishbone orIshikawa

    diagram)

    y Chi-square test of independence and fits

    y Control chart

    y Correlation

    y Cost-benefit analysis

    y CTQ tree

    y

    Design of experiments

    y Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)

    y General linear model

    y Histograms

    y Quality Function Deployment (QFD)

    y Pareto chart

    y Pick chart

    y

    Process capabilityy Quantitative marketing research through use of Enterprise

    Feedback Management (EFM) systems

    y Regression analysis

    y Root cause analysis

    y Run charts

    y SIPOC analysis (Suppliers, Inputs,Process,Outputs,Customers)

    y Taguchi methods

    y

    Taguchi Loss Functiony TRIZ

    Quality management tools and

    methods used in Six Sigma

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    64/81

    The following example demonstrates the basic process:My car will not start. (the problem)Why? - The battery is dead. (first why)Why? - The alternator is not functioning. (second why)Why? - The alternator belt has broken. (third why)Why? - The alternator belt was well beyond its useful service life and has never

    been replaced. (fourth why)Why? - I have not been maintaining my car according to the recommended serviceschedule. (fifth why, a root cause)Why? - Replacement parts are not available because of the extreme age of myvehicle.(sixth why, optional footnote)I will start maintaining my car according to the recommended service schedule.

    (solution)

    5Why

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    65/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    66/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    67/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    68/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    69/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    70/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    71/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    72/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    73/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    74/81

    CustomerCentricity

    The Six Sigma culture is customer-centric; its goalis to delight customers. The quality of a product orservice is measured from the customers perspective,by its contribution to their success. This

    customer focus comes through the Six Sigma drivers: Voice of the Customer: What the customer says that they

    want

    Requirements: Voice of the Customer input that is

    translated into specific, measurable elements

    Critical to Quality (CTQ): Requirements that are most

    important to customers

    Defect: Failing to deliver to a customers CTQ

    Design for Six Sigma: Designing products andprocesses

    basedon customer requirements

    Critical Success Factors for Six

    Sigma

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    75/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    76/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    77/81

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    78/81

    Joseph JuranBorn 1904Joseph Juran is an internationally acclaimed quality guru, similar toEdwards Deming, strongly influencing Japanese manufacturingpractices. Joseph Jurans belief that qualitydoes not happen byaccident gave rise to the quality trilogy:

    o

    Quality planningoQuality controloQuality improvement

    The key steps in implementing company-wide strategic goals are:Identify customers and their needs both internal and external and work to meet those needsCreate measures of quality, establish optimal quality goals andorganise to meet them.Create processes capable of meeting quality goals in realoperating conditions.

    Failure mode and effects

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    79/81

    Failure mode and effects

    analysis

    A failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA), is a procedure in productdevelopment and operations management for analysis of potential failuremodes within a system for classification by the severity and likelihood of thefailures.

    Failure modes are any errors or defects in a process, design, or item,

    especially those that affect the customer, and can be potential or actual.ffects analysis refers to studying the consequences of those failures.

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    80/81

    Example FMEA Worksheet

    Function Failure

    mode

    Effects S

    (severit

    y

    rating)

    Cause(s) O

    (occurren

    ce rating)

    Current

    controls

    D

    (detection

    rating)

    CRIT

    (critical

    charact

    eristic

    RPN

    (risk

    priority

    number

    )

    Recomme

    nded

    actions

    Responsibili

    ty and

    target

    completion

    date

    Action

    taken

    Fill tub High level

    sensor

    never

    trips

    Liquid

    spills on

    customer

    floor

    8 level

    sensor

    failed

    2 Fill

    timeout

    based on

    time to fill

    to low

    level

    sensor

    5 N 80 Perform

    cost

    analysis

    of adding

    additional

    sensor

    halfway

    between

    low and

    high level

    sensors

    Jane Doe

    level

    sensor

    disconnec

    ted

    10-Oct-10

  • 8/6/2019 Lean Six Sigma Presentation

    81/81

    Bibliography

    (2008). (): -companies, ,.4,.1, 2008., ,..(2004).

    ,(2007). ,

    (2009). Taking Lean Six SigmaBeyond Manufacturing: Improvement, & .(2009). , , , (2000).HoneywellAerospaceElectricalSystem,Singapore

    , . (2002). . - : ://.--./. & (2004). ,

    SeanP. Goffnett(2004). Understanding : Education , ,. 20, . 4, - 2004. (- 2007). 20 ,-://../-