landscape and land‐use effects on the spatial variation of soil chemical properties
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [Duke University Libraries]On: 02 September 2013, At: 21:07Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,UK
Communications in Soil Scienceand Plant AnalysisPublication details, including instructions forauthors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lcss20
Landscape and Land‐UseEffects on the Spatial Variationof Soil Chemical PropertiesZongming Wang a , Bai Zhang a , Kaishan Song a ,Dianwei Liu a , Chunying Ren a , Sumei Zhang a ,Liangjun Hu b , Haijun Yang b & Zhiming Liu ba Northeast Institute of Geography and AgriculturalEcology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun,Jilin Province, Chinab Northeast Normal University, Changchun, JilinProvince, ChinaPublished online: 04 Sep 2009.
To cite this article: Zongming Wang , Bai Zhang , Kaishan Song , Dianwei Liu ,Chunying Ren , Sumei Zhang , Liangjun Hu , Haijun Yang & Zhiming Liu (2009)Landscape and Land‐Use Effects on the Spatial Variation of Soil Chemical Properties,Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 40:15-16, 2389-2412, DOI:10.1080/00103620903111301
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103620903111301
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all theinformation (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and viewsexpressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the
Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified withprimary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for anylosses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly orindirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of theContent.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone isexpressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found athttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
Landscape and Land-Use Effects on the SpatialVariation of Soil Chemical Properties
Zongming Wang,1 Bai Zhang,1 Kaishan Song,1 Dianwei Liu,1 Chunying
Ren,1 Sumei Zhang,1 Liangjun Hu,2 Haijun Yang,2 and Zhiming Liu2
1Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, Chinese Academy
of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin Province, China2Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
Abstract: The current study addressed the spatial variation of soil organic matter
(SOM), total nitrogen (TN), extractable phosphorus (EP), and extractable
potassium (EK) in agricultural soils of a representative region, northeast China.
Soil cation exchange capacity (CEC) and the effects of landscape attributes and
land use were also investigated. The techniques used included conventional
statistics, geostatistics, and geographic information systems (GIS). Our study
demonstrated that EP had the greatest coefficient of variation (CV), and CEC
had the least CV. The experimental semivariograms of the five soil chemical
properties included in this study were all fitted with exponential models. The five
soil variables all showed moderate spatial dependence. The SOM, EK, and CEC
decreased with increasing altitude. Significant negative relationships were found
between the slope gradient and EP, EK, and CEC. Relatively steeper slopes might
result in greater soil erosion, which leads to a decline in soil nutrients. Soil types
had significant impacts on all soil chemical properties, which reflect the effect of
the parent soil material. In general, the mean values of soil variables for vegetable
land were statistically greater than those for upland and paddy fields. After being
divided into two parts along the Yinma River, soil samples of the western part
have statistically greater SOM, EP, EK, and CEC values than those collected
from the eastern part.
Received 23 October 2007, Accepted 11 October 2008
Address correspondence to Zongming Wang, Northeast Institute of
Geography and Agricultural Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Changchun 130012, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 40: 2389–2412, 2009
Copyright # Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN 0010-3624 print/1532-2416 online
DOI: 10.1080/00103620903111301
2389
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
Keywords: Geostatistics and GIS, landscape attributes, land use, soil chemical
properties, northeast China
INTRODUCTION
Almost all soil properties exhibited variability as a result of the dynamic
interactions among the natural environmental factors (i.e., climate,parent material, vegetation, and topography; Jenny 1941). Significant
differences in soil chemical properties in a small area on uniform geology
are known to be related to landscape position (Jenny 1941; Ruhe 1956;
Rezaei and Gilkes 2005). Soil chemical properties and in turn plant
growth are significantly controlled by the variation in landscape
attributes including slope gradient, slope aspect, and elevation, which
influence the distribution of energy, plant nutrients, and vegetation by
affecting organic activity, runoff and run-on processes, natural drainageconditions, and exposure of soil to wind and precipitation (Buol, Hole,
and McCraken 1989; Rezaei and Gilkes 2005).
To study the spatial distribution patterns of soil properties,
conventional statistics and geostatistics have been applied widely (Van
Meirvenne et al. 1996; Saldana, Stein, and Zinck 1998; McGrath and
Zhang 2003; Liu et al. 2006). Based on the theory of a ‘‘regionalized
variable’’ (Matheron 1963; Webster and Oliver 2001), geostatistics
provides advanced tools to quantify the spatial features of soilparameters and to carry out spatial interpolation. The research benefits
of the geographic information systems (GIS) approach have been
illustrated by many ecological and agricultural studies. Geographic
information systems can be utilized to spatially analyze the characteristics
of the objectives in question. In addition, GIS is useful in producing
interpolated maps for visualization.
Northeast China is one of the main agricultural regions in China. Its
cultivated land and total crop yield now account for 19 and 30% of thenation’s total, respectively. Concerning the relationship between agri-
cultural management practices and soil properties in the northeast, many
field experiments have been conducted to investigate the effects of
cropping, tillage, and fertilization on soil chemical properties (Wang
1996; Liu and He 2002; Liu et al. 2003, 2005; Meng, Zhang, and Sui 2003;
Wang and Liu 2003; Yang et al. 2004; Xing et al. 2005; Han et al. 2006;
Wang et al. 2007).
However, in this region, there were few studies on the spatialvariability of soil properties under the influences of natural and
anthropogenic factors (Liu et al. 2006). A better understanding of the
spatial variability of soil properties is important for refining agricultural
management practices and for improving sustainable land use (McGrath
2390 Z. Wang et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
and Zhang 2003). It provides a valuable base against which subsequent
and future measurements can be evaluated. Many soil chemical proper-
ties are of a dynamic nature. The dynamic nature of soil chemical
properties were hypothesized to be directly affected by landscape
attributes in addition to the indirect influences of landscape attributes
via providing different microclimates that support the growth of plant
species with different characteristics. Management factors may exacer-
bate or deteriorate the effects of environmental factors (Rezaei and
Gilkes 2005). This study aims to explore how soil chemical properties
[soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), extractable phosphorus
(EP), extractable potassium (EK), and soil cation exchange capacity
(CEC)] are controlled by natural environmental factors and anthropo-
genic land use in the agricultural soils of northeast China by taking a
representative county as a case study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Area
Jiutai County (125u 429–126u 499 E, 43u 859–44u 619 N) is located in the
middle part of Jilin Province, northeast China (see Figure 1). The county
has an altitude between 147 and 580 m with a total area of 3376 km2. The
study area is characterized by a temperate, semihumid continental
monsoon climate. Seasons alternate between dry and windy springs,
humid and warm summers with intensive rainfall, windy and dry
autumns, and long, cold, dry winters. The mean annual temperature is
about 4.8 uC, and the average annual precipitation is 582 mm, with 82%
occurring between May and September. The average amount of sunshine
each year is 2571 h, and the average wind speed is about 3.3 ms21. The
frost-free period is about 130–140 d in duration. In this county, the
Second Songhua River, the Mushi River, the Wukai River, and the
Yinma River flow through the area and then into the Songhua River. The
main soils are dark brown forest soil (Haplic Luvisol, FAO), meadow soil
(Eutric Vertisol, FAO), aeolian soil (Arenosol, FAO), black soil (Luvic
Phaeozem, FAO), and paddy soil (Hydragric Anthrosol, FAO).
As a representative agricultural county of northeast China, more
than 70% of the total area of Jiutai County is used as cultivated land. The
current fertilization and management style have prevailed for more than
20 years. In this area, single crops were replanted annually with
continuous spring maize, Zea mays L., as the prevailing cropping system.
Other cropping systems include continuously cropped rice, Oryza sativa
L., and continuously cropped vegetables. Overall, the average yield for
the county is about 9000, 8600, and 36000 kg ha21 for maize, rice, and
Spatial Variation of Soil Chemical Properties 2391
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
vegetables, respectively. In the study area, hoeing by hand is a common
field practice.
Soil Sampling and Analysis
In this study, the soil data were collected in a regional soil fertility
investigation. A maximum of two sites were selected at random from
each grid (area of 10 km2). Samples of 0 to 20-cm depth from 311 sites
were taken in late October 2004, after crops were harvested. The 0 to 20-
cm depth of soil is the plowed layer for agricultural production in this
region, and soil chemical properties in this layer are important for crop
growth. Of the 311 points investigated, 260 locations are for upland
under maize, 37 locations are for paddy fields, and 14 locations are for
vegetables. The five replicate samples were homogenized by hand mixing
and were sieved after being air dried. The soil chemical properties
considered in this study are SOM, TN, EP, EK, and CEC. Soil organic
matter was determined using the potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7)
titration method (Fu et al. 2001). Total N was determined using the
semimicro-Kjeldahl method (Bremner and Mulvaney 1982). The Olsen
method was used to determine EP using a molybdate reaction for
colorimetric detection (Olsen and Sommers 1982). To determine EK, the
neural 1 N ammonium acetate extraction method was used (Knudsen,
Peterson, and Pratt 1982). Cation exchange capacity was determined for
soil samples by the replacement of exchangeable cations with ammonium
acetate (Editorial Committee 1996).
The locations of the cropland sampling sites are recorded in Figure 1.
Geographical Datasets of the Study Area
Topographic maps of the study area (1:100,000 scale, created in 1987)
were scanned and digitized, and a raster digital elevation model (DEM)
was built. Elevation and slope gradient were extracted from DEM.
Landsat-7 images (ETM+ of August 2002, 15-m resolution) were used to
derive land-use information for the study area. The Landsat images were
enhanced using linear contrast stretching and histogram equalization to
help identify ground control points in the rectification to the common
ALBERS coordinate system based on 1:100,000 topographic maps. For
each ETM scene, at least 20 evenly distributed sites served as ground
control points (GCPs). The reference data were collected from a field
survey and existing land-use map that had been field checked. The soil
map of the study area (1:200,000) was scanned and digitized. With the
help of the spatial analyst module of the software, ArcGIS, values of soil
2392 Z. Wang et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
chemical properties were linked to topographic variables (elevation and
slope gradient), soil type, and land-use type.
Statistical and Geostatistical Methods
Means, standard deviations, variances, coefficients of variation, and
maximum and minimum values were generated for each of the variables
studied. Data were tested for the normal frequency distribution by
Figure 1. Soil sampling locations in Jiutai County, northeast China (n 5 311).
Spatial Variation of Soil Chemical Properties 2393
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
examining the coefficients of skewness and kurtosis (Paz Gonzalez,
Vieira, and Castro 2000). The Pearson correlation coefficients were
estimated for all possible paired combinations of the variables (SOM,TN, EP, EK, CEC, longitude, latitude, elevation, and slope gradient) to
generate a correlation coefficient matrix. The effects of soil type and
land-use type on soil properties were assessed using the analysis of
varience (ANOVA) method. These statistics were performed using Excel
2000 and SPSS 8.0. In studying the spatial differences for soil properties,
t-tests were adopted.
Geostatistics (Matheron 1963) uses the semivariogram to quantify
the spatial variation of a regionalized variable and provides the input
parameters for the spatial interpolation method of Kriging (Krige 1951).The semivariogram is half the expected squared difference between paired
data values z(x) and z(x + h) to the lag distance h, by which locations are
separated (Webster and Oliver 2001):
r hð Þ~ 1
2E z xð Þ{z xzhð Þ½ �2 ð1Þ
For discrete sampling sites, such as sampled in our study, the
function is usually written in the form
r hð Þ~ 1
2N hð ÞXN hð Þ
i~1
z xi{z xizhð ÞÞð½ �2 ð2Þ
where z(xi) is the value of the variable Z at location xi, h is the lag, and
N(h) is the number of pairs of sample points separated by h. For irregular
sampling, it is rare for the distance between the sample pairs to be exactly
equal to h. That is, h is often represented by a distance band.
The experimental variogram is calculated for several lag distances.
This is then generally fitted with a theoretical model, such as spherical,exponential, or Gaussian models. The optimal theoretical model was
determined using the determining coefficient (R2) and the least residual
sums of squares (RSS). The models provide information about the spatial
structure as well as the input parameters for the Kriging interpolation.
Kriging is considered an optimal method of spatial prediction. It is a
theoretical weighted moving average:
z x0ð Þ~Xn
i~1
liz xið Þ ð3Þ
where z x0ð Þ is the value to be estimated at a location x0, z(xi) is the known
value at the sampling site xi, and n is the number of sites within the search
neighborhood used for the estimation. The number n is based on the size
of the moving window and is defined by the user. Kriging is different
2394 Z. Wang et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
from other methods (such as inverse distance weighting), because the
weight, li, is no longer arbitrary. The weights depend on the parameters
of the variogram model and the sampling configuration and are decided
under conditions that are unbiased and that minimize estimation
variance. A detailed description of geostatistics is covered well within
the publication record (McGrath and Zhang 2003; Zhang and McGrath,
2004; Liu et al. 2006).
In our study, the geostatistical analyses were carried out with GS+
(version 3.1a demo; Gamma Design Software LLC, Plainville, Mich.),
and maps were produced with GIS software ArcGIS (version 9.0; ESRI,
Redlands, Calif.).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Descriptive Statistics
For soil chemical properties, the histograms of raw data are positively
skewed, but the log-transformed data were near normal. Table 1 indicates
the quantitative parameters of the probability distribution for the five
variables. In addition, P–P plots showed that for the raw data of each soil
variable, there is a significant deviation from the straight line. However,
the log-transformed data are close to the straight line. These results imply
that the soil chemical properties in croplands of the study area follow
lognormal distribution.
The coefficient of variation, standard deviation, and basic statistical
parameters of percentiles and means are shown in Table 2. Among the
five soil chemical properties, extractable P and extractable K showed the
greatest CV (65.0% and 46.0%, respectively). The larger CV for soil-
extractable P and extractable K could be linked to the heterogeneity of
the land-use pattern, fertilizer or erosion, which is in agreement with
studies by Chien et al. (1997) and Sun, Zhou, and Zhao (2003). Because
soil chemical properties have the log-normal feature here, we argue that
Table 1. Shape parameters of the probability distributions (n 5 311)
Parameter Raw data Log-transformed data
Skewness Kurtosis Skewness Kurtosis
SOM 2.15 7.75 0.76 1.53
TN 2.42 8.60 0.93 2.56
EP 1.34 1.42 20.22 20.11
EK 2.93 13.42 0.88 1.65
CEC 0.49 1.62 20.62 2.99
Spatial Variation of Soil Chemical Properties 2395
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
Table 2. Coefficient of variation (CV), standard deviation (SD), and basic statistical parameters of soil chemical properties (n 5 311)
Variables CV SD Min. 5% 25% Median 75% 95% Max. Mean GeoMean
SOM (%) 30.86 0.83 1.17 1.84 2.15 2.54 3.01 4.14 7.90 2.69 2.80
TN (%) 29.23 0.038 0.06 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.19 0.35 0.13 0.13
EP (mg kg21) 65.04 16.84 3.20 6.36 14.50 22.10 32.70 71.10 73.50 25.89 29.53
EK (mg kg21) 46.02 57.75 54.00 68.60 92.00 114.00 139.00 236.40 555.00 125.50 134.51
CEC (cmol kg21) 19.17 4.05 7.50 15.02 18.66 20.89 23.04 28.24 37.97 21.13 21.78
23
96
Z.
Wa
ng
eta
l.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
the geometric mean and median are more representative for the mean
values of the data than the arithmetic mean.
Correlation between Soil Chemical Variables
Pearson (linear) correlation coefficients between the five variables and
landscape attributes were given in Table 3, together with the correspond-
ing significance levels.
Abundant literature sources indicate a positive relationship between
soil organic carbon (SOC) and the capacity of the soil to supply essential
plant nutrients including N, P, and K (Rezaei and Gilkes 2005). In this
study, the Pearson linear correlation analysis indicates highly significant
positive relationships between SOM and N (r 5 0.78), P (r 5 0.17), and K
(r 5 0.39).
For our results, a positive correlation was confirmed between SOM
and CEC, which represents the total capacity of a soil to hold
exchangeable cations, part of the soil reservoir providing nutrient
elements for plant growth. The correlation coefficient for the linearrelationship between SOM and CEC (0.409) in this study was consistent
with SOC contributing to soil fertility by serving as a reservoir of plant
cationic nutrients through providing a cation exchange surface (Kay, da
Silva, and Baldock 1997) and also through its capacity to act as a pH
buffer. A strong positive relationship between CEC and organic matter
may indicate that in the first layer organic matter provides a surface area
and negative charge to retain exchangeable cations (Rezaei and Gilkes
Table 3. Correlation coefficient matrix for soil chemical variables and
landscape attributes (longitude, latitude, elevation, and slope gradient)
Variable SOM TN EP EK CEC LON LAT ELE SLO
SOM 1 ** ** ** ** ** ns * ns
TN 0.783 1 ** ** ** ** ** ns ns
EP 0.174 0.259 1 ** ns ** ** ns *
EK 0.386 0.459 0.457 1 ** ** ns * *
CEC 0.409 0.347 0.087 0.366 1 ** ns * *
LON 20.240 20.205 20.329 20.278 20.410 1 ** * **
LAT 20.003 20.184 20.341 20.098 20.079 0.612 1 ns ns
ELE 20.136 20.105 20.002 20.163 20.253 0.133 20.090 1 *
SLO 20.078 20.028 20.127 20.135 20.210 0.219 0.106 0.680 1
Notes. For sake of brevity, the symbols are designated as follows: soil organic
matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), extractable phosphorus (EP), extractable
potassium (EK), cation exchange capacity (CEC), longitude (LON), latitude
(LAT), elevation (ELE), and slope (SLO).
**Denotes significance at the 0.01 level. ‘‘ns’’ means not significant. The
number of observations for all variables was 311.
Spatial Variation of Soil Chemical Properties 2397
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
2005). Thus, one may conclude that SOM within the cropland system
provides nutrients for plant growth, resulting in a positive feedback as
more plant biomass is likely to produce more SOM. In this study, all soil
chemical variables demonstrated a significant negative correlation with
longitude, which may reflect the effect of different levels of rainfall, andTN and EP were correlated significantly to latitude. For these reasons,
future research is needed.
Analysis of Spatial Dependence of Soil Chemical Properties
For the five soil chemical properties, the semivariogram models and best-fit model parameters are shown in Table 4 and Figure 2. The soil chemical
properties included in this study all show a positive nugget, which can be
explained by sampling error, short-range variability, and random and
inherent variability. In general, the nugget-to-sill ratio can be used to
classify the spatial dependence of soil properties (Cambardella et al.
1994). The variable is considered to have a strong spatial dependence if
the ratio is less than 25% and has a moderate spatial dependence if the
ratio is between 25% and 75%; otherwise, the variable has a weak spatialdependence. In the study area, the nugget-to-sill ratio of soil chemical
properties showed a moderate spatial dependence (0.70, 0.68, 0.69, 0.50,
and 0.62, for SOM, TN, EP, EK, and CEC, respectively), which could be
attributed to intrinsic (soil-forming processes) and extrinsic factors (soil
fertilization and cultivation practices).
Analysis of Landscape and Land-Use Factors in Relation to Soil Chemical
Properties
Effects of Elevation and Slope Gradient
Results (Table 3) showed that, SOM, EK, and CEC were significantly
negatively correlated to elevation. This means these three soil properties
Table 4. Parameters for variogram model for soil chemical properties
Parameter Model Range
a (km)
Effective
range
(km)
Nugget
C0
Sill
C0 + C
Nugget/
sill C0 /
(C0 + C)
R2 RSS
LnSOM Exponential 7.60 22.80 0.316 1.055 0.700 0.911 0.000058
LnTN Exponential 3.80 11.40 0.324 1.015 0.681 0.788 0.000026
LnEP Exponential 3.40 10.20 0.321 1.020 0.685 0.630 0.0020
LnEK Exponential 97.00 291.00 0.772 1.545 0.500 0.866 0.00024
LnCEC Exponential 38.00 114.00 0.527 1.384 0.619 0.893 0.000066
2398 Z. Wang et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
Figure 2. Omnidirectional experimental variograms of soil chemical properties.
Spatial Variation of Soil Chemical Properties 2399
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
steadily decreased with increasing altitude. Correlations between eleva-
tion and soil CEC (r 5 20.253) was stronger than correlations between
elevation and SOM (r 5 20.136) and EK (r 5 20.163). However, hardly
any correlation of elevation, TN, and EP was found (Table 3).
For relationship between elevation and SOM, some studies have
found that a higher elevation has greater SOM concentrations in
grassland soils (e.g., McGrath and Zhang, 2003). In explanation, it can
be assumed that high elevations tend to result in increased precipitation
and decreased temperature; both of these environmental factors tend to
favor accumulation of humus. Our correlations show a decrease in SOM
with elevation. The reason is that in this study, all soil samples were
collected from cropland. Soils from higher elevation usually have a bigger
slope (Figure 1), which leads to relatively greater soil erosion and a
reduction in soil nutrients.
Decreased values with slope gradient were found for EP, EK, and
CEC. There was almost no correlation between slope gradient and SOM
and TN. In explanation, in agricultural regions of northeast China, soil
erosion is considered one of the important factors affecting soil nutrient
loss (Tang 2004). It can be assumed that a relatively steeper slope might
result in more soil erosion, which would lead to a decline in soil nutrients.
Together with parent material, climate, biota, and time, topography
is one of the five fundamental elements of the soil-forming-factor theory
(Jenny 1941); topography is a major factor controlling soil process at the
landscape scale (Seibert, Stendahl, and Sorensen 2007). The local slope
determines not only such processes as erosion and sediment redistribu-
tion but also local drainage capacity. However, the greatest effect of
topography on soils in, for instance, boreal regions is its influence on
water flow patterns at the landscape level. Topographical features such as
curvature, slope, and upslope area influence the hydrological conditions
of a location and generate different soil moisture conditions and flow
patterns, and these influences inevitably affect soil physical and chemical
properties (Seibert, Stendahl, and Sorensen 2007). Results obtained in
this study displayed a strong correlation between topographical features
and soil chemical properties.
Differences among Chemical Properties of Soil Samples from Different
Soils
To define the effect of soil type on soil chemical properties, comparison
of data among soil samples from different soil types was conducted.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates that there are significant
differences between variables with different soil types (p , 0.05). These
results reflect the effect of soil parent materials on the condition of soil
variables. Furthermore, the post hoc tests were conducted.
2400 Z. Wang et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
For log-transformed data, SOM, TN, EP, and EK have homogenous
variances between different soil type groups at a significance level of
0.176, 0.076, 0.084, and 0.258, respectively, and thus Duncan’s test can be
applied (Table 5). For LnSOM, the five soil type groups of samples can
be divided into three subsets. The first subset contains samples from the
dark brown forest soil, the Aeolian soil, and the black soil; the second
subset contains aeolian soil, black soil, and meadow soil groups; and the
third subset consists of meadow soil and paddy soil groups. The
differences within either of the subsets are not significant at the 0.05 level,
with significance levels of 0.498, 0.063, and 0.063, respectively. However,
the difference between the subsets is statistically significant at the 0.000
Table 5. Results of post hoc tests in ANOVA with Duncan’s method (with
mean values of LnSOM, LnTN, LnEP, and LnEK in each soil type group)
Soil n SD Subset 1 Subset 2 Subset 3 Subset 4
LnSOM
Dark brown forest soil 28 0.231 0.868
Meadow soil 80 0.309 1.026 1.026
Aeolian 26 0.212 0.904 0.904
Black soil 157 0.238 0.913 0.913
Paddy soil 20 0.285 1.141
Significance level 0.498 0.063 0.063
LnTN
Dark brown forest soil 28 0.225 22.104 22.104
Meadow soil 80 0.290 22.017
Aeolian 26 0.225 22.136
Black soil 157 0.209 22.142 21.843
Paddy soil 20 0.277
Significance level 0.530 0.133 1.000
LnEP
Dark brown forest soil 28 0.654 3.034
Meadow soil 80 0.732 2.968
Aeolian 26 0.594 2.924
Black soil 157 0.591 3.180
Paddy soil 20 0.587 2.595
Significance level 1.000 0.128
LnEK
Dark brown forest soil 28 0.367 4.603 4.603
Meadow soil 80 0.390 4.765 4.765
Aeolian 26 0.297 4.558
Black soil 157 0.339 4.790
Paddy soil 20 0.370 4.959
Significance level 0.598 0.057 0.766 1.000
Spatial Variation of Soil Chemical Properties 2401
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
level (with an F-value of 6.167). It can be found that in this area,
statistically, samples from paddy soil have the greatest SOM (3.25%) and
those from dark brown forest soil have the least SOM values (2.44%).
For LnTN, the soil type groups were divided into three subsets, too.
The differences within any of the subsets are not significant at the 0.05
level, with significance levels of 0.530, 0.133, and 1.000, respectively.
However, the difference between the subsets is statistically significant at
the 0.000 level (with an F-value of 9.284). Soil samples from paddy soil
have the greatest TN values (0.16%), and samples from aeolian soil and
black soils have the least TN values (0.12%).
For LnEP, the five soil type groups were divided into two subsets.
The differences within either of the subsets are not significant at the 0.05
level, with significance levels of 1.000 and 0.128, respectively. The
difference between the subsets is statistically significant at the 0.001 level
(with an F-value of 4.782). Soil samples from black soil have the greatest
EP values (28.41 mg kg21), and those from paddy soil have the least EP
values (15.65 mg kg21).
For LnEK, the soil type groups were divided into four subsets. The
differences within any of the subsets are not significant at the 0.05 level,
with significance levels of 0.598, 0.057, 0.766, and 1.000, respectively.
However, the difference between the subsets is statistically significant at
the 0.000 level (with an F-value of 5.353). Soil samples from paddy soil
have the greatest EK values (151.95 mg kg21), and samples from aeolian
soil have the least EK values (99.81 mg kg21).
For raw data or log-transformed data of CEC, the Levene test
showed that the variances between the groups of the data set are not
homogenous, and thus Duncan’s test cannot be applied. The Tamhane
method was adopted. Results showed that soil samples from paddy soil
have the greatest CEC values (24.99 cmol kg21), and samples from dark
brown forest soil have the least CEC values (18.77 cmol kg21).
Comparison of Means of Soil Chemical Properties under Different Land
Uses
The land-use map for the study is illustrated in Figure 3. In this study, the
soil samples were from three land-use types. Comparison of chemical
properties among soil samples from different land-use types was
conducted. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates that there are
significant differences between variables from different land-use types (p
, 0.05). These results reflect the effect of soil management, cropping, and
fertilization on the condition of soil variables. Furthermore, the post hoc
tests were conducted.
For log-transformed data, SOM and CEC have homogenous
variances between different land-use type groups, at significance levels
2402 Z. Wang et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
of 0.307, 0.113, and 0.82, respectively, and thus Duncan’s test can be
applied (Table 6). For LnSOM, the three land-use type groups of samples
can be divided into two subsets. The first subset contains samples from
upland, and the second subset contains paddy field and vegetable land
groups. Differences within either of the subsets are not significant at the
0.05 level, with significance levels of 1.000 and 0.054, respectively.
However, the difference between the subsets is statistically significant at
the 0.000 level (with an F-value of 29.916). It can be found that, samples
from upland have lesser SOM values (2.55%) than those from paddy field
and vegetable land (3.29% and 3.68%, respectively).
For LnCEC, results were obtained similar to those for LnSOM:
samples from upland have lesser CEC values (20.49 cmol kg21) than
Figure 3. Land-use map of Jiutai County, northeast China.
Spatial Variation of Soil Chemical Properties 2403
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
those from paddy field and vegetable land (24.81 cmol kg21 and
23.44 cmol kg21, respectively).
For raw data or log-transformed data of TN, EP and EK, the Levene
tests showed that the variances between the groups of the data set are not
homogenous, and thus Duncan’s test cannot be applied. Then the
Tamhane method was adopted. Results showed that soil samples from
upland have the least TN values (0.12%), and those from vegetable land
have the greatest TN values (0.15%). Soil samples from paddy field have
the least EP values (17.55 mg kg21), and those from vegetable land have
the greatest EP values (72.07 mg kg21). Soil samples from upland and
paddy field have lesser EK values (115.85 mg kg21 and 140.92 mg kg21,
respectively) than those from vegetable land (264.07 mg kg21).
In summary, the mean values of soil variables for vegetable land were
statistically greater than those for upland and paddy field. In explana-
tion, in the study area, farmers often apply more chemical fertilizer for
vegetable land to get more vegetable output. According to household
investigations, in this county, application of manure is very common for
different land-use types. The amount applied is about 3000 kg ha21, and
the average N content of the manure is 0.7%. The average N inputs are
218, 216, and 253 kg ha21 for upland growing maize, paddy fields, and
vegetable lands, respectively. The average P fertilizer inputs are 87, 81,
and 150 kg ha21 for uplands, paddy fields, and vegetable lands,
respectively. The average K inputs are 29, 37, and 40 kg ha21 for
uplands, paddy fields, and vegetable lands, respectively. A comparison of
the chemical fertilizer inputs for the three land-use types is shown in
Figure 4.
Table 6. Results of post hoc tests in ANOVA with Duncan’s method (with
mean values of LnSOM and LnCEC in each land use type group)
Parameter n SD Subset 1 Subset 2 Subset 3
LnSOM
Upland 260 0.243 0.905
Paddy field 37 0.269 1.156
Vegetable land 14 0.225 1.280
Significance level 1.000 0.054
LnCEC
Upland 260 0.187 3.003
Paddy field 37 0.204 3.191
Vegetable land 14 0.0762 3.152
Significance level 1.000 0.413
2404 Z. Wang et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
Spatial Distribution of Soil Chemical Properties
The parameters of the exponential model were used for Kriging to
produce spatial distribution maps for SOM, TN, EP, EK, and CEC in the
agricultural soils of the study area. The final results of the spatial
interpolation are recorded in Figure 5. It was found from the spatial
distribution maps of soil chemical properties that for SOM, EP, EK, and
CEC, data values in the western part are greater than those in the eastern
part. However, for TN, there is no obvious visual trend.
To further explore the spatial differences for soil chemical properties,
the study area was divided into two parts: the western part and the
eastern part, with a line along the Yinma River (see Figure 1). The 311
soil samples were then separated into two subsets. The sample sizes were
112 and 199, respectively. The mean values of SOM, TN, EP, EK, and
CEC in the two areas are shown in Table 7. Results indicated that for
SOM, EP, EK, and CEC, the average values in the western part were
noticeably greater than those of the eastern part, with relative differences
of 14.7, 32.5, 25.4, and 25.4%, respectively. For EP, the average value of
0.132 in the western part was somewhat more than that of the eastern
part, 0.126. The relative difference was 4.8%.
Figure 4. Chemical fertilizer inputs for different land use types in Jiutai County,
northeast China.
Spatial Variation of Soil Chemical Properties 2405
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
Figure 5. Spatial distribution map of SOM (a), TN (b), EP (c), EK (d), and
CEC (e) in Jiutai County, northeast China.
2406 Z. Wang et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
Table 7. Mean values of soil chemical properties in the western part and the eastern part
Variable Region n Minimum Maximum Average Median Geometric
mean
Std. deviation
SOM (%) Western 112 1.91 6.71 2.93 2.79 2.85 0.75
Eastern 199 1.17 7.90 2.56 2.30 2.45 0.84
TN (%) Western 112 0.07 0.31 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.035
Eastern 199 0.06 0.35 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.040
EP (mg kg21) Western 112 5.00 73.50 30.71 26.70 25.44 18.61
Eastern 199 3.20 73.50 23.18 20.40 19.11 15.13
EK (mg kg21) Western 112 56.00 555.00 144.20 127.00 135.46 64.14
Eastern 199 54.00 375.00 114.98 101.00 107.06 51.05
CEC(cmol kg21) Western 112 17.24 37.97 23.26 22.73 23.05 3.27
Eastern 199 7.50 34.56 19.93 19.90 19.54 3.95
Sp
atia
lV
aria
tion
of
So
ilC
hem
ical
Pro
perties
24
07
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
The t-tests were conducted to further compare the differences
between soil variables in the two parts of the study area, and the results
are listed in Table 8.
Results indicated that for SOM, TN, EK, and CEC, the variances
between the two data sets are homogenous with significance levels of
0.473, 0.128, 0.607, and 0.343, respectively. Thus, the t-test values of
3.934, 1.352, 4.408, and 7.580 with ‘‘equal variances assumed’’ were used.
Significance levels of 0.000, 0.000, and 0.000 for the two-tailed test
showed that soil samples of the western part have statistically greater
SOM, EK, and CEC values than those collected from the eastern part.
For TN, the significance level of 0.178 for the two-tailed test indicated
that there is no significant difference between TN values from the western
part compared to those from the eastern part. For EP, the variances
between the two data sets are not homogenous because the significance
Table 8. Results of Levene’s test and t-test of soil chemical properties for the
western and eastern regions
Variable Variance assumption Levene’s test for
equality of
variances
t-Test for equality
of means
F Significance t Significance
(two-tailed)
SOM Equal variances
assumed
0.516 0.473 3.934 0.000**
Equal variances not
assumed
4.062 0.000
TN Equal variances
assumed
2.335 0.128 1.352 0.178
Equal variances not
assumed
1.402 0.162
EP Equal variances
assumed
9.597 0.002 3.873 0.000
Equal variances not
assumed
3.657 0.000**
EK Equal variances
assumed
0.265 0.607 4.408 0.000**
Equal variances not
assumed
4.138 0.000
CEC Equal variances
assumed
0.903 0.343 7.580 0.000**
Equal variances not
assumed
7.992 0.000
**Denotes significance at the 0.01 level.
2408 Z. Wang et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
level was 0.002 (,0.05). For this reason, the t-test value of 3.657 with
‘‘equal variances not assumed’’ was used. A significance level of 0.000
indicates that soil samples collected from the western part have
statistically greater EP values than those from the eastern part of the
study area.
Comparison between spatial distribution map of soil chemical
properties (Figure 5) and the elevation map (Figure 1) and the land-use
map (Figure 3) of the study area can give us the information that the
spatial distribution of SOM, EP, EK, and CEC is generally consistent
with the topographical features. In the eastern part, croplands have
greater elevation and greater slope (Figure 6). However, in the western
part, cropland is characterized with flat plain. In the eastern part, water
Figure 6. Slope degree map of Jiutai County, northeast China.
Spatial Variation of Soil Chemical Properties 2409
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
and tillage erosion may be the main reason for the decline in soil chemical
properties resulting from a relatively greater water and soil loss caused by
the relatively steeper slope.
CONCLUSIONS
A better understanding of the spatial variability of soil nutrients is
essential for refining agricultural management practices and for improv-
ing sustainable land use in northeast China. This article took a
representative county as an example to explore the spatial distribution
characteristics and related affecting factors of soil chemical properties in
croplands. Results indicated that soil chemical properties had a moderate
spatial dependence, which could be attributed to intrinsic (soil-forming
processes) and extrinsic factors (soil fertilization and cultivation
practices). Elevation and slope gradient both significantly affect soil
chemical properties, which reflect the effect of soil loss. The effects of soil
type could be explained by the differences between soil parent materials.
The spatial distribution of SOM, EP, EK, and CEC is generally
consistent with the topographical features. For TN, there is no obvious
spatial difference in different parts.
Soils in northeast China before reclamation have high nutrient values
because of their parent material, climate, and natural vegetation
characteristics. However, after about 100 years of reclamation and
tillage, the soil quality in this region has declined greatly. The application
of manure and crop residues, either alone or in combination with
chemical fertilizers, should have a positive effect, helping to maintain and
restore soil quality for the croplands of northeast China. The adoption of
proper agricultural management systems may maintain and restore soil
productivity. In addition, the adoption of soil conservation practices to
reduce soil erosion is in increasing in this region.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was jointly supported by the National Basic Research
Program of China (No. 2009CB421103) and the Knowledge Innovation
Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. KZCX-2-YW-341). We
thank Profs. Jian Huang and Huilin Zhang for help in obtaining soil
samples and in conducting soil analysis. We thank the editor of the
journal and anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and
suggestions on an earlier draft.
2410 Z. Wang et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
REFERENCES
Bremner, J. M., and C. S. Mulvaney. 1982. Nitrogen–Total. In Methods of soil
analysis, vol. 2, ed. A. L. Page, 595–624. Madison, Wisc.: American Society of
Agronomy.
Buol, S. W., F. D. Hole, and R. J. McCracken. 1989. Soil genesis and
classification. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
Cambardella, C. A., T. B. Moorman, J. M. Novak, T. B. Parkin, D. L. Karlen, R.
F. Turco, and A. E. Konopka. 1994. Field-scale variability of soil properties in
central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58:1501–1511.
Chien, Y. J., D. Y. Lee, H. Y. Guo, and K. H. Houng. 1997. Geostatistical
analysis of soil properties of mid-west Taiwan soils. Soil Science 162:291–298.
Editorial Committee. 1996. Soil physical and chemical analysis and description of
soil profiles. Beijing, China: Standard Press of China.
Fu, B. J., X. D. Guo, L. D. Chen, K. M. Ma, and J. R. Li. 2001. Soil nutrient
changes due to land use changes in northern China. Soil Use and Management
17 (4): 294–296.
Han, X. Z., S. Y. Wang, P. L. M. Veneman, and B. S. Xing. 2006. Changes of
organic carbon content and its fractions in black soil under long-term
application of chemical fertilizers and recycled organic manure.
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 37 (7): 1127–1137.
Jenny, H. 1941. Factors of soil formation: A system of quantitative pedolog. New
York: McGraw-Hill.
Kay, B. D., A. P. da Silva, and J. A. Baldock. 1997. Sensitivity of soil structure to
changes in organic carbon content: Predictions using pedotransfer functions.
Canadian Journal of Soil Science 77:655–667.
Krige, D. G. 1951. A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems
on the Witwatersrand. Journal of the Chemical, Metallurgical, and Mining
Society of South Africa 52 (6): 119–139.
Knudsen, D., G. A. Peterson, and P. Pratt. 1982. Lithium, sodium, and
potassium. In Methods of soil analysis, vol. 2, ed. A. L. Page, 225–246.
Madison, Wisc.: American Society of Agronomy.
Liu, D. W., Z. M. Wang, B. Zhang, K. S. Song, X. Y. Li, J. P. Li, F. Li, and H. T.
Duan. 2006. Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and analysis of related
factors in croplands of the black soil region, northeast China. Agriculture,
Ecosystems, and Environment 113:73–81.
Liu, X. B., X. Z. Han, C. Y. Song, S. J. Herbert, and B. S. Xing. 2003. Soil
organic carbon dynamics in black soils of China under different agricultural
management systems. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 34 (7/
8): 973–984.
Liu, X. B., J. D. Liu, B. S. Xing, S. J. Herbert, K. Meng, X. Z. Han, and X. Y.
Zhang. 2005. Effects of long-term continuous cropping, tillage, and fertilization
on soil organic carbon and nitrogen of black soils in China. Communications in
Soil Science and Plant Analysis 36 (9/10): 1229–1239.
Liu, X. T., and Y. He. 2002. Research on comprehensive development of regional
agriculture in northeast China. Beijing, China: Science Press.
Matheron, G. 1963. Principles of geostatistics. Economic geology and the bulletin
of the Society of Economic Geologists 58:1246–1266.
Spatial Variation of Soil Chemical Properties 2411
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13
McGrath, D., and C. S. Zhang. 2003. Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon
concentrations in grassland of Ireland. Applied Geochemistry 18:1629–1639.
Meng, K., X. Y. Zhang, and Y. Y. Sui. 2003. Impedient factors in black soils in
the northern part of northeast China. Soils 35 (2): 145–151.
Olsen, S. R., and L. E. Sommers. 1982. Phosphorus. In Methods of soil analysis,
vol. 2, ed. A. L. Page, 403–430. Madison, Wisc.: American Society of
Agronomy.
Paz Gonzalez, A., S. R. Vieira, and T. Castro. 2000. The effect of cultivation on
the spatial variability of selected properties of an umbric horizon. Geoderma
97:273–292.
Rezaei, S. A., and R. J. Gilkes. 2005. The effects of landscape attributes and plant
community on soil chemical properties in rangelands. Geoderma 125:167–176.
Ruhe, R. V. 1956. Geomorphic surface and the nature of soils. Soil Science
82:441–455.
Saldana, A., A. Stein, and J. A. Zinck. 1998. Spatial variability of soil properties
at different scales within three terraces of the Henare River (Spain). Cantena
33:139–153.
Seibert, J., J. Stendahl, and R. Sorensen. 2007. Topographical influences on soil
properties in boreal forest. Geoderma 141:139–148.
Sun, B., S. L. Zhou, and Q. G. Zhao. 2003. Evaluation of spatial and temporal
changes of soil quality based on geostatistical analysis in the hill region of sub-
tropical China. Geoderma 115:85–99.
Tang, K. L. 2004. Soil and water conservation in China. Beijing, China: Science
Press.
Van Meirvenne, M., J. Pannier, G. Hofman, and G. Louwagie. 1996. Regional
characterization of the long-term change in soil organic carbon under intensive
agriculture. Soil Use and Management 12:86–94.
Wang, J. G. 1996. Study on agroecosystem in Songnen Plain of northeastern China.
Harbin, China: Harbin Engineering University Press.
Wang, J. G., and H. X. Liu. 2003. Nutrient equilibrium, gain, and loss in black
soil farmland. Acta Pedologica Sinica 40 (2): 246–251.
Wang, Z. M., B. Zhang, K. S. Song, D. W. Liu, J. P. Li, J. Huang, and H. L.
Zhang. 2007. Analysis of related factors for soil nutrients in croplands of
typical agricultural county, northeast Plain, China. Journal of Soil and Water
Conservation 21 (2): 73–77.
Webster, R., and M. Oliver. 2001. Geostatistics for environmental scientists.
Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Xing, B. S., X. B. Liu, J. D. Liu, and X. Z. Han. 2005. Physical and chemical
characteristics of a typical Mollisol in China. Communications in Soil Science
and Plant Analysis 35 (13/14): 1829–1838.
Yang, X., X. Zhang, H. Fang, and A. Liang. 2004. Changes in organic matter and
total nitrogen of black soils in Jilin Province over the past two decades. Scientia
Geographica Sinica 24 (6): 710–714.
Zhang, C. S., and D. McGrath. 2004. Geostatistical and GIS analyses on soil
organic carbon concentrations in grassland of southeastern Ireland from two
different periods. Geoderma 119:261–275.
2412 Z. Wang et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
1:07
02
Sept
embe
r 20
13