lake plants speak out - niwa · lake plants speak out on lake condition introduction aquatic plants...

1

Upload: lekien

Post on 25-Jul-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Waikaremoana

Rotoma

Rotoiti1988

Rotoiti2003

Rotoehu1988 & 2003

Rotorua2003

Rotorua1988

Okareka1988

Okareka2003

Okaro1988

Okaro2003

This lineillustrates lakeecologicalcondition onthe decline!

Decline in lakeconditiontypicallypreceedspublicawareness -but thenconditionsare serious!

100%

0%

50%

Wakatipu

LA

KE

C

ON

DIT

ION

www.niwa.co.nzNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand

ph: +64-7-856 7026, fax: +64-7-856 0151 email [email protected]

Lake plants speak outon lake conditionIntroductionAquatic plants are valuable indicators of lake health, and for five

Rotorua lakes the submerged plants that inhabit them have been

given the chance to speak out on lake ecological condition.

LakeSPI or �Lake Submerged Plant Indicators� is a new

management tool that uses submerged plants from within lakes

to indicate lake ecological condition.

Lakes Rotoiti, Rotoehu, Rotorua, Okareka and Okaro were

chosen by Environment BOP for this assessment due to

widespread concern over their deteriorating condition.

LakeSPILakeSPI uses information based on aquatic plant measurements

taken from within lakes in order to generate three LakeSPI

indices:

�Invasive Condition Index�

This captures the invasive character of vegetation in a

lake based on the degree of impact by invasive weed

species.

�Native Condition Index�

This captures the native character of vegetation in a lake

based on diversity and quality of indigenous plant

communities.

�LakeSPI Index�

This is a synthesis of components from both the native

condition and invasive condition of a lake and provides an

overall indication of lake ecological condition.

Submerged plants are used as are they are easy to observe,

integrate long-term climatic and environmental influences and

bring a focus to the littoral margins of a lake where greatest

public interaction and perception occurs.

MethodFive sites were selected from within each of the five lakes and

LakeSPI surveys were carried out in September 2003.

LakeSPI indices were calculated and then compared with indices

generated for lakes from historic surveys.

Details of the LakeSPI method can be found in the LakeSPI

manuals or website shown below.

ResultsLake Rotoiti

l Overall lake condition � very poor!

l LakeSPI Index has decreased.

l Blue/green algae smothering plants.

l Invasive weed species close to maximum

impact.

l Worst rating weed (hornwort) dominant.

l Native condition at only 18% of its potential.

Lake Rotoehu

l Overall lake condition � Poor.

l LakeSPI Index has remained stable.

l Blue/green algae covering plants.

l Invasive weed species can still get worse.

Lake Rotorua

l Lake condition very poor.

l LakeSPI Index increased slightly due to declining

invasive species.

l Blue/green algae covering plants.

l Worst invasive weed (hornwort) present but having

little effect.

l Lake condition moderated by high exposure that

helps to minimise invasive weed impact and water

quality features.

Lake Okareka

l Lake condition � compromised and still declining.

l LakeSPI Index has decreased over 15 year period

(due to egeria spread + decline in meadows

attributable to deteriorating water clarity.

l Invasive weed species can get much worse (no

hornwort).

l Native charophyte meadows still present but

maximum depth is declining.

l Blue/green algae covering plants.

Lake Okarol Lake condition � very poor!

l LakeSPI Index largely unchanged from already

degraded state.

l Blue/green algae smothering plants.

l Invasive weed species can get much worse!

l Very few native species.

Conclusionsl Lake Rotoiti and Okareka have continued to decline in lake condition; while Lakes

Rotorua, Rotoehu and Okaro have remained in a stable yet degraded state since the

1980�s.

l All five lakes are now dominated by invasive weed species, native vegetation has

been largely displaced, former deep water charophyte communities have all but

disappeared, and the health of remaining aquatic vegetation is clearly compromised

by smothering growths of filamentous blue-green algae.

l LakeSPI will continue to provide meaningful baseline for assessing future management

initiatives on the Rotorua lakes.

www.niwa.co.nz/ncwr/lakespi

Tracey Edwards

John Clayton

Lake Okaro

0

20

40

60

80

100

19

88

20

03

19

88

20

03

19

88

20

03

ma

xim

um

po

ten

tia

l (%

)

Acknowledgements

Environment BOP for their assistance.

FRST for funding under our Aquatic Plant Management programme that helped

support the development of the LakeSPI methodology.

Acknowledgements

Environment BOP for their assistance.

FRST for funding under our Aquatic Plant Management programme that helped

support the development of the LakeSPI methodology.

www.niwa.co.nzNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand

ph: +64-7-856 7026, fax: +64-7-856 0151 email [email protected]

Invasive Native LakeSPI

Lake plants speak outon lake condition

Lake Okareka

0

20

40

60

80

100

19

88

20

03

19

88

20

03

19

88

20

03

ma

xim

um

po

ten

tia

l (%

)

Invasive Native LakeSPI

Lake Rotorua

0

20

40

60

80

100

ma

xim

um

po

ten

tia

l (%

)

19

88

20

03

19

88

20

03

19

88

20

03

Invasive Native LakeSPI

0

20

40

60

80

100

ma

xim

um

po

ten

tia

l (%

)

Lake Rotoehu

19

88

20

03

19

88

20

03

19

88

20

03

Invasive Native LakeSPI

Lake Rotoiti

ma

xim

um

po

ten

tia

l (%

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Invasive Native LakeSPI

19

88

20

03

19

88

20

03

19

88

20

03