lad: reincarnation
DESCRIPTION
LAD: Reincarnation. Mr. DeZilva. Living after Death in Physical Form: Reincarnation. Reincarnation, also known as rebirth The individual continues to live after death in some sort of bodily form Being reborn into this world after death into a new physical body. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Mr. DeZilvaMr. DeZilva
Reincarnation, also known as rebirth The individual continues to live after death in
some sort of bodily form Being reborn into this world after death into a
new physical body
Living after Death in Physical Form: Reincarnation
Each person has an essential self known as the atman This self is eternal and seeks unity with God In the Upanishads (Hindu sacred text), it says that
spiritual wisdom comes when people recognise the ultimate identity of the atman with the divine
God manifests himself in the atman of each individual Once this manifestation is realised, there is no need for
the atman to continue in the cycle of rebirth it has attained its release, this is known as moksha
The physical body is nothing more than a vehicle for the atman
Hindu beliefs in Reincarnation
Hindus believe that the process of rebirth is
controlled by the law of karma Each deliberate action from a person has
consequences (fruits) (good act = good consequences)
The Karmic fruits attach themselves to atman and keep it in the cycle of birth and rebirth (samsara) The quality of one’s future life is determined by how
the individual acts in their current life For example, if someone is poor or disabled, this could
be because they acted morally bad in their past lives
Hindu beliefs continued
Everyone is where they are in their current life
because of their own actions of a past life Seems like there is no compassion for the poor
However, everyone has an atman and has a connection to the divine
Concern for the well-being of others is important
The beggar at your gate or the refugee you see on the news might be your own parent or child in the past or future lives.
Implications for Hinduism
Buddhist have no belief in the soul or a God Anatta the Buddhist belief that there is no self and
that the sense of self is an illusion (soullessness) A person is made up of the five skandhas (aggregates
or strands), beyond which there is no essential self Matter, sensation, perception, volition (acts of will), and
consciousness All of these are merged together to make a person who
attracts karma The wise person is one who realises that any sense of
atman is an illusion
Buddhist beliefs in Reincarnation
Like Hinduism, also believe in Karma and Samsara What is it that is reborn, then, if there is no self?
Buddhist say that the person is neither the same nor different
The analogy of the lighted candle which in turn lights another candle (the two flames are neither the same nor different, but the energy from one candle begins the flame of the next)
What does Karma attach its fruits to if there is no essential self? One is not freed from their evil deeds Mango analogy from The Questions of King Malinda
Implications for Buddhism
Pythagoras (570 BC to 495 BC)
Greek Philosopher and Mathematician Claimed to have memories of past lives Believed that as an individual passed through a successive
life, they also gained in wisdom and in virtue to live on in another life
Benjamin Franklin (1706 – 1790) "I look upon death to be as necessary to the constitution
as sleep. We shall rise refreshed in the morning." Mark Twain (1835 – 1910)
"I have been born more times than anybody except Krishna."
Western beliefs in Reincarnation
Karma works with perfect justice It is seen as natural law, and that whatever
happens, no matter how long removed from a previous terrible action, will always be just.
For both Hindus and Buddhist
Ian Stephenson wrote Twenty Cases
Suggestive of Reincarnation (1974) The book explores 20 cases in which there is
apparent evidence that an individual is the reincarnation of someone else who lived in the past but has died.
Chose to study children, as opposed to adults, and found that children had “memories” of past lives and these memories had an unusual resemblance to the lives of deceased people that they had never met
Evidence for Reincarnation
Swarnlata, a child in India described a house
that she used to live in (but she never had), sang songs she has never learned, spoke a language she did not grow up speaking and recognised people she had never seen.
She resembled the deceased daughter of a family in every fashion, even greeting the family members with “a warm affection”
Other examples will be provided later
Examples from Stevenson
Strong evidence supports that the children would not have been lying or trying to fraud the research since they had nothing to gain from the “lies.”
Cryptoamnesia The memory of the subconscious A person thinks they remember something, but in fact,
has heard about it from another source. Genetic Memory Similar to how a bird can
“remember” to build a nest at a young age. Something instilled in a child that they just “know”
Extra-Sensory Perception Paranormal and telepathic links potentially occurred, but still wouldn’t explain the “remembering” of events
Stevenson’s explanation
These examples that Stevenson provides could be
examples of culturally influences John Hick directly critiques Stevenson by saying that
these cases of Reincarnation take place in countries and cultures that already have a strong belief in reincarnation
Christianity, Judaism, and Islam would find that reincarnation contradicts with the teachings of the Bible or the Qu’ran. If reincarnation is true, then it takes away from the
importance of the one valuable and special life to live that these religions believe in and promote.
Criticism of Reincarnation
(rebirth)
John Hick further suggests that reincarnation
may be explained by some kind of extra-sensory perception The dead person leaves behind some kind of
psychich traces (what he calls husks) enabling a memory of a previous individual or of a life (further explained in replica theory)
Issue of Identity Shared memory is not the same as identity. It is
impossible for two different individuals to be in any way “the same person.” It is a contradiction
Further Criticisms