kumari the arresting goddess-november 12, 2006

1
The Kathmandu Post Sunday, November 12, 2006 4 EXPRESSION By GHANSHYAM SHARMA D uring this Dashain and Tihar, I got dozens of emails sprinkled with the blessings of goddess Durga. I usually thank the sender, but with some of the more intimate friends I couldn't help grumbling about issues of culture, change and individual responsibility. My conversation centered on our love of repeat- ing dead habits and failure to influence the younger generation with new perspectives. The first thing we don't do is think 'other- wise.' Sel-roti is our metaphor; we love to go round and round in our thinking. We let biology and Darwinism gather dust at home, and go to a temple to ask for a grandson. Nepalis become progressive only to turn into a bhakta of some kind of irrationality as we turn forty. Sel roti. Our democracy is also like sel-roti, and so are our many social, cultural, political predicaments. And we love it that way. We don't bother to tell a bitter truth to a friend, and we bother not to tell the truth to our- selves. When the festivals come, we must rethink how much of the dead old habits we are repeating. Many things we do in Dashain/Tihar are just dead habits, odious if not rotten. Sons-in-law receive thick envelopes that the old father-in-law has to fill through hard work every year, but they never rethink about it. We practise dead habits, and we don't talk about the ugliness involved in the socio-economic dynamism that Dashain brings about. We make our wives play the 'buhari' role and remind us of the eternal oppression of women. Just that we don't mind, as we men sit doing whole lots of nothing for the whole vacation. We don't notice how poor Thute Sarki fails to com- plete a smile at us when we meet him on his way to the landlord, we know the rate of interest for the money he borrows, and so do the Maoist cadres. I remember asking a priest in a temple in Tamil Nadu why they differed from other Hindus in the way they didn't offer milk and laddu, ghee and acchyata to the gods. He smiled and said, "You'd better give those things to human being to make prabhu happy!" It hurts me to remember the image of the priest in Pashupatinath pouring hundreds of liters of milk on the unhappy lord's stone heads every day. And we all know where the money goes. I am also thinking of the Protestant revolution in France in the Medieval times. When are we going to do anything significant about our cul- ture, except the dead habits? Many things we keep repeating in the name of culture are just cats we tie to the pillar because we'd seen our father do the same. I am thinking of the inability of our intellectuals to tell their children that our culture and religion are basi- cally the product and process of social life-so they must change and fit our needs and situa- tions. They were formulated by men living thou- sands of years ago, with an entirely different understanding and perspective about the universe and life and only certain 'timeless' themes are useful. Many things in our education, administration, pol- itics, and cultural life need just a sec- ond thought. Can we do it in a more meaningful way? Stop pouring milk over Pashupatinath. Perhaps, we can learn from the amazing flexibility of our grandpar- ents. Here's an example: when they didn't have seven real 'pundits,' they let six Brahmins made of 'kush' stand on the rice on the 'taparis.' Can't we mix a spoon of milk on a gagri- full of water and bathe Shivajee? Or if we can be as outrageous as the Tamil priests, we could stop it. Seriously. Emails and tea talks are important because you can tell a lot of people about dead habits. And, if most of them can't be interested, they'll at least laugh at you and digest sel roti better. I am thinking of the way a few cranky people's talk has made history in every generation: Rousseau, Gangalal, Russell, BP, Ibsen, Madan Bhandari. And I am sure that rethinking at the level of tea talk contributes to the making of history. If you will tell your friend that he has a shred of spinach sticking between his teeth, why won't you tell her that her thoughts also need cleaning up? O ur Kumari will be going to school like other ordinary girls. Wait, not so soon and of course, not so easily. The 'landmark' Supreme Court order which came on Wednesday, 1 November 2006, to inquire if the tradition of wor- shipping a "living goddess" has led to the exploitation of girls and the violation of human rights, wouldn't delight most of the people from her own community. The tradition of installing a 'living god- dess' had started around 17th century in Nepal. Still, the tradition has a large num- ber of supporters. The people from Newari community greatly admire and worship the 'goddess'. However, the tradition has been a subject of criticism among the fem- inists and the human rights activists for some time now. The 'transitional-period', as our politi- cal leaders put in, has brought so many social, cultural and legal issues at the fore- front. All of a sudden, 'old' issues have become 'new' and 'challenging' as never before. Yet, finally the 'bare' verdict has arrived, and what we common Nepali peo- ple feel is a sense of triumph over the 'tra- dition' which has been binding us even though we are heading onto the 21st cen- tury. When we divulge into the issue of 'exploitation' of children in the context of Nepal, there is a very disturbing reality that awaits us. Those street-children, those young conductors, those children 'employed' in so many big and small hotels, shops and offices of Kathmandu, those who have been forced to carry arms in the so-called 'liberation army' of the rebels and those who have been a member of our own families- they are constantly exploited, and it rarely makes a news- headline in our all-powerful and presti- gious news-media. It is said that so many NGOs, INGOs, the government and so many other people like the human rights activist and philan- thropists have invested so much time and 'money' to help these destitute, helpless and illiterate children, but what you see makes you feel like those were just false rumors. What surprises this author most is the 'bliss of ignorance' our concerned officials do possess. There is a clear 'direction' as not to employ children under a 'pre-defined' age- bar on even the KMC-certificates that is hung in almost all the shops and enterpris- es in the valley. In the so-called 'hearts' of the Kathmandu valley, you will find many children, under the age of 10/12, working as 'domestic-assistants' in homes, hotels and vendors. It would be no surprise if we happen to hear a minister or two 'employ- ing' them in their own properties. But the tradition of Kumari is not asso- ciated so much with 'exploitation'. It is more associated with the people's 'expec- tations'. A 'living-goddess' is expected to behave like one. A personal journey 'from goddess to mortal' is not one she is pre- pared for. Some people might say that we, Bahuns and Chhhetris, Magars or the peo- ple belonging to Madhesi community might not be able to apprehend so many things about Newari culture and tradition. These people would say that the 'tradition' can't be 'judged' from an outsider's per- spective. However, what everybody should be able to apprehend is the feeling of seg- regation, of failure to socialize and of the mounting difficultly which every retired Kumaris have gone through. This author has been fortunate to accompany the Kumari to the Taleju tem- ple a few years back on kalratri, the eight day of the Dashain festival. It was then that I had observed the rituals so minute- ly. In fact, what I found so fascinating have never ceased to bemuse yet. I bow down to the 'goddess' as an ordinary person, and I find myself unable to dismiss her as a human being like all of us. I think that this is the main problem with the tradition in itself. With so many 'hindrances', so many secrets and complexities of the tradition, an outsider like me and so many people from within the Newar community would find it hard to say if the tradition is about 'exploiting the girls' or not. The need for the reconsideration of few aspects of the tradition is a 'just' call of the hour. What worries most of the people is the negative effects, if there are any, of the 'forced' installation of a child into a 'symbol' of a powerful goddess alongside the violations of her basic or minimum rights as a child and human being. Nobody has said that this tradition should be discontinued, they are willing to see the reforms that would benefit the child and the whole society in itself. A minimum of Rs.6000 pension that a retired Kumari gets after her reversion can't be an adequate 'compensation' of her 'imprisonment' and loss of normal childhood. Of course, there are difficul- ties and hardships that ex-Kumaris go through in day to day living, but we have for long turned a blind eye to such accounts. There are many beautiful and positive aspects of the Kumari tradition, however, the faithful followers of the 'goddess' should also seriously consider the negative aspects of the tradition. For this, first and foremost, the ex-Kumaris should come out and help to aware peo- ple about the different aspects of the tra- dition themselves. The former Kumaris should tell us, if they really think that they were exploited in the name of a glorious tradition. The ex- Kumaris can only tell us if there is such urgency to reform or 'modernize' the insti- tution or not. They surely know more about the tradition and the whole experience of being transformed from an ordinary child to the post of Kumari and back to being a normal human being. Our retired 'goddess- es' must come out, and speak for the cause of the 'divinity' themselves. To sum it up, the Supreme Court order should be taken in a positive light, and those who called it a 'landmark decision' have rightly said so. The Kumari-tradition should never be discontinued, but the institution should possess the courage to move along the redefining times of the twenty-first century. People are in no mood to stop worshipping the 'living-god- dess' but there is a need to reform and reconsider the whole custom. We have expressed a desire to benefit the child, for her better future. The 'goddess' will surely bless us for all our concerns and initiatives to ensure the child a normal childhood and a better life. May, Goddess Kumari bless us all, especially the child she has chosen to be. Thinking new Nepali Theatre as a see it - By Dr Abhi Subedi Publishers - Arrohan, Gurukul Price - NRS 225, Edition - First, Pages- 237 ISBN: 99946-998-9-x A ll the world's a stage; And all the men and women merely players", said William Shakespeare in the pastoral comedy As You Like It. This cannot be less true in case of Dr Abhi Subedi, except that he loves to play different roles in life with a same sense of mastery and perfection. With the publication of Nepali Theatre as I See It, the poet-cum-artcritic-cum- playwright has added a new perspec- tive to the study of Nepali theatrical heritage. The book, says Dr Subedi, is an outcome of his personal efforts to perceive the structural forms of the performative culture of Nepal and its influence on Nepali theatre. Neatly divided into nine sections, the book commences with an overview of the performance culture. The history of performance culture in Nepal dates back to time immemorial, to the time of the Lichavvi and Malla kings when the Kathmandu city was largely inhabited by the Newars. There is no term to describe the tra- dition of performance culture, even though it was manifest in both tan- gible -- and intangible -- artistic and cultural forms. These forms changed into newer forms as they passed from one generation to another. Dr Subedi's quest as an artist was to study the different forms of performance tradition and the way they were metamorphosed into newer forms. Although a narrative of Dr Subedi's own journey as a play- wright, the book combines histori- cal narratives with autobiographical elements. Chapter- Two, Three, Four and Five deals more with his- tory of Nepali theatre while Chapter- 6 onward is autobiographical. Dr Subedi begins with a general overview of the heritage of Nepali theatre that has been largely shaped by performance tradition. He makes extensive use of the term Nepal Mandala, which incorporates the art, architecture, dramaturgy, music, dance and performance cul- ture of the historic cities of Kathmandu, Bhaktapur and Lalitpur. For Dr Subedi, one unique feature of the Nepal Mandala is that all forms of art that exist here project a strong sense of performance. The playwright sees dynamism not only in the songs and dances accompany- ing street festivals, but also in the stone sculptures surrounding the ancient Chagunarayan temple, paintings, murals and many such architectural designs. Dr Subedi's approach to the his- tory of Nepali theatre is scientific and systematic - he first states his hypothesis, then goes on assimilat- ing facts and data, tracks down his- torical narratives, incorporates find- ings of foreign and domestic schol- ars, and finally sets his conclusion. He begins his theatrical journey right from the medieval ages; studies the influence of Parsi theatre and theatricians such as Keshar Man Tuladhar, Master Ratnadas Prakash, Hari Prasad Rimal and Bekh Narayan Maharjan; and then allots a whole chapter for revolutionary dramatist Bal Krishna Sama and his contributions in bringing theatre from the courtyards of the Rana rulers to the public. In Chapter-5, he discusses the influence of natural- ism, realism and surrealism in Nepali theatre and experimental plays written by writers such as Bhim Nidhi Tiwari, Satya Mohan Joshi and Madhav Ghimere. One thing remarkable about Dr Subedi is that he knows how to jux- tapose subtle comments while talk- ing about lighter issues in a leisurely mood. For instance, in the sub-unit Street March as Power of Performance of Chapter-2, he is talking about the heritage of travel and the carnivalesque mode of demonstration during the Newar street performance. Out of blue, he brings in King Prithivi Narayan Shah and explains how things changed after he rode the chariot that was meant for King Jaya Prakash Malla who fled after his kingdom was invaded by a Shah king from the house of Gorkhas. Dr Subedi contin- ues with his subtle comments as he explains how the streets of Kathmandu are being less used for ritualistic celebration and more for broader political demonstrations these days! That is not to say that he is against political demonstrations, however. In the same unit, he nos- talgically remembers the 1990 revolution and the way streets became a stage for a political show that heralded democracy. Dr Subedi's description is sure to remind us of the recent April upris- ing that paved the way for the for- mation of a new democratic state. Talking of streets, Dr Subedi has devoted an entire chapter to study the relation of theatre and streets. He deals with the theme of travel and street elsewhere as well. In Chapter-2, for instance, there is a separate sub-section called Heritage of Street, where the playwright discusses how the two tropes "jour- ney" and "street" have shaped the tradition of Nepali theatre. He has elaborately described how people acted dramas on streets, infusing them with dances and songs. Says Dr Subedi, "On streets gods travel in palanquins carried by followers; kings traveled on chariots, first Rolls-Royce cars that came on peo- ple's backs to Kathmandu ran on streets here raising clouds of dust… the Rana chiefs riding horses and drawing swords stand by the sides of the streets as though they were con- stantly peering down at the passers by." The playwright has beautifully deciphered the relation of travel and architectural space in the sub-sec- tion Rituals of Travel and Architectural Space of Chapter-2. According to Dr Subedi, the street marches in ancient Newari festivals such as Gaijatra and Indrajatra were to pass "in front of houses that had windows open to streets." Here, the open windows served as a stage from where the spectators could view the street performance. At other times, the stage included royal courtyards such as the square at Hanumandhoka designed to accom- modate a huge audience, or raised platforms (dabalis) constructed in vast open spaces for public con- sumption of plays. In a nutshell, Dr Subedi's new book on theatre is a good read for Westerners as well as Easterners and domestic lovers of theatre. When I first got hold of the book, I was highly impressed by the color- ful jacket, the smooth foliage, and the beautiful arrangement of photos. However, Dr Subedi needs to devote a few quiet hours to correct some of the minor typos when the next edition of the volume comes out. Reviewed by Monica Regmi [email protected] Nepali theatre and performance culture Kumari: The arresting goddess The street marches in ancient Newari festivals such as Gaijatra and Indrajatra were designed to pass "in front of houses that had windows open to streets." Here, the open win- dows served as a stage from where the spectators could view the street performance. By SALIK SHAH page_4tkp.qxd 11/11/2006 9:29 PM Page 1

Upload: salik-shah

Post on 07-Mar-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Nepali Theatre as a see it - By Dr Abhi Subedi Publishers - Arrohan, Gurukul Price - NRS 225, Edition - First, Pages- 237 ISBN: 99946-998-9-x By SALIK SHAH Reviewed by Monica Regmi [email protected] The Kathmandu Post Joshi and Madhav Ghimere. One thing remarkable about Dr Subedi is that he knows how to jux- tapose subtle comments while talk- ing about lighter issues in a leisurely mood. For instance, in the sub-unit Street March as Power of page_4tkp.qxd 11/11/2006 9:29 PM Page 1

TRANSCRIPT

The Kathmandu PostSunday, November 12, 20064 EXPRESSION

By GHANSHYAM SHARMA

During this Dashain and Tihar, I got dozensof emails sprinkled with the blessings ofgoddess Durga. I usually thank the

sender, but with some of the more intimatefriends I couldn't help grumbling about issues ofculture, change and individual responsibility.My conversation centered on our love of repeat-ing dead habits and failure to influence theyounger generation with new perspectives.

The first thing we don't do is think 'other-wise.' Sel-roti is our metaphor; we love to goround and round in our thinking. We let biologyand Darwinism gather dust at home, and go to atemple to ask for a grandson. Nepalis becomeprogressive only to turninto a bhakta of somekind of irrationality as weturn forty. Sel roti. Ourdemocracy is also likesel-roti, and so are ourmany social, cultural,political predicaments.

And we love it thatway. We don't bother totell a bitter truth to afriend, and we bother notto tell the truth to our-selves. When the festivalscome, we must rethinkhow much of the dead oldhabits we are repeating.Many things we do inDashain/Tihar are justdead habits, odious if notrotten. Sons-in-lawreceive thick envelopesthat the old father-in-law has to fill through hardwork every year, but they never rethink about it.We practise dead habits, and we don't talk aboutthe ugliness involved in the socio-economicdynamism that Dashain brings about.

We make our wives play the 'buhari' role andremind us of the eternal oppression of women.Just that we don't mind, as we men sit doingwhole lots of nothing for the whole vacation. Wedon't notice how poor Thute Sarki fails to com-plete a smile at us when we meet him on his wayto the landlord, we know the rate of interest forthe money he borrows, and so do the Maoistcadres.

I remember asking a priest in a temple inTamil Nadu why they differed from otherHindus in the way they didn't offer milk andladdu, ghee and acchyata to the gods. He smiledand said, "You'd better give those things to

human being to make prabhu happy!" It hurtsme to remember the image of the priest inPashupatinath pouring hundreds of liters of milkon the unhappy lord's stone heads every day.And we all know where the money goes. I amalso thinking of the Protestant revolution inFrance in the Medieval times. When are wegoing to do anything significant about our cul-ture, except the dead habits?

Many things we keep repeating in the nameof culture are just cats we tie to the pillar becausewe'd seen our father do the same. I am thinkingof the inability of our intellectuals to tell theirchildren that our culture and religion are basi-cally the product and process of social life-sothey must change and fit our needs and situa-tions. They were formulated by men living thou-sands of years ago, with an entirely different

understanding andperspective aboutthe universe and lifeand only certain'timeless' themesare useful.

Many things inour education,administration, pol-itics, and culturallife need just a sec-ond thought. Canwe do it in a moremeaningful way?Stop pouring milkover Pashupatinath.Perhaps, we canlearn from theamazing flexibilityof our grandpar-ents. Here's anexample: when they

didn't have seven real 'pundits,' they let sixBrahmins made of 'kush' stand on the rice on the'taparis.' Can't we mix a spoon of milk on a gagri-full of water and bathe Shivajee? Or if we can beas outrageous as the Tamil priests, we could stopit. Seriously.

Emails and tea talks are important becauseyou can tell a lot of people about dead habits.And, if most of them can't be interested, they'll atleast laugh at you and digest sel roti better. I amthinking of the way a few cranky people's talkhas made history in every generation: Rousseau,Gangalal, Russell, BP, Ibsen, Madan Bhandari.And I am sure that rethinking at the level of teatalk contributes to the making of history.

If you will tell your friend that he has a shredof spinach sticking between his teeth, why won'tyou tell her that her thoughts also need cleaningup?

Our Kumari will be going to schoollike other ordinary girls. Wait, notso soon and of course, not so easily.

The 'landmark' Supreme Court orderwhich came on Wednesday, 1 November2006, to inquire if the tradition of wor-shipping a "living goddess" has led to theexploitation of girls and the violation ofhuman rights, wouldn't delight most of thepeople from her own community.

The tradition of installing a 'living god-dess' had started around 17th century inNepal. Still, the tradition has a large num-ber of supporters. The people from Newaricommunity greatly admire and worshipthe 'goddess'. However, the tradition hasbeen a subject of criticism among the fem-inists and the human rights activists forsome time now.

The 'transitional-period', as our politi-cal leaders put in, has brought so manysocial, cultural and legal issues at the fore-front. All of a sudden, 'old' issues havebecome 'new' and 'challenging' as neverbefore. Yet, finally the 'bare' verdict hasarrived, and what we common Nepali peo-ple feel is a sense of triumph over the 'tra-dition' which has been binding us eventhough we are heading onto the 21st cen-tury.

When we divulge into the issue of'exploitation' of children in the context ofNepal, there is a very disturbing realitythat awaits us. Those street-children,those young conductors, those children'employed' in so many big and smallhotels, shops and offices of Kathmandu,those who have been forced to carry armsin the so-called 'liberation army' of therebels and those who have been a memberof our own families- they are constantlyexploited, and it rarely makes a news-headline in our all-powerful and presti-gious news-media.

It is said that so many NGOs, INGOs,the government and so many other peoplelike the human rights activist and philan-thropists have invested so much time and'money' to help these destitute, helplessand illiterate children, but what you seemakes you feel like those were just falserumors. What surprises this author mostis the 'bliss of ignorance' our concernedofficials do possess.

There is a clear 'direction' as not toemploy children under a 'pre-defined' age-bar on even the KMC-certificates that ishung in almost all the shops and enterpris-es in the valley. In the so-called 'hearts' of

the Kathmandu valley, you will find manychildren, under the age of 10/12, workingas 'domestic-assistants' in homes, hotelsand vendors. It would be no surprise if wehappen to hear a minister or two 'employ-ing' them in their own properties.

But the tradition of Kumari is not asso-ciated so much with 'exploitation'. It ismore associated with the people's 'expec-

tations'. A 'living-goddess' is expected tobehave like one. A personal journey 'fromgoddess to mortal' is not one she is pre-pared for. Some people might say that we,Bahuns and Chhhetris, Magars or the peo-ple belonging to Madhesi communitymight not be able to apprehend so manythings about Newari culture and tradition.These people would say that the 'tradition'can't be 'judged' from an outsider's per-spective. However, what everybody shouldbe able to apprehend is the feeling of seg-regation, of failure to socialize and of themounting difficultly which every retiredKumaris have gone through.

This author has been fortunate toaccompany the Kumari to the Taleju tem-ple a few years back on kalratri, the eightday of the Dashain festival. It was thenthat I had observed the rituals so minute-ly. In fact, what I found so fascinating havenever ceased to bemuse yet. I bow down tothe 'goddess' as an ordinary person, and Ifind myself unable to dismiss her as ahuman being like all of us. I think that thisis the main problem with the tradition initself. With so many 'hindrances', so manysecrets and complexities of the tradition,an outsider like me and so many peoplefrom within the Newar community wouldfind it hard to say if the tradition is about'exploiting the girls' or not. The need for

the reconsideration of few aspects of thetradition is a 'just' call of the hour. Whatworries most of the people is the negativeeffects, if there are any, of the 'forced'installation of a child into a 'symbol' of apowerful goddess alongside the violationsof her basic or minimum rights as a childand human being. Nobody has said thatthis tradition should be discontinued, theyare willing to see the reforms that wouldbenefit the child and the whole society initself.

A minimum of Rs.6000 pension thata retired Kumari gets after her reversioncan't be an adequate 'compensation' ofher 'imprisonment' and loss of normalchildhood. Of course, there are difficul-ties and hardships that ex-Kumaris gothrough in day to day living, but we havefor long turned a blind eye to suchaccounts. There are many beautiful andpositive aspects of the Kumari tradition,however, the faithful followers of the'goddess' should also seriously considerthe negative aspects of the tradition. Forthis, first and foremost, the ex-Kumarisshould come out and help to aware peo-ple about the different aspects of the tra-dition themselves.

The former Kumaris should tell us, ifthey really think that they were exploited inthe name of a glorious tradition. The ex-Kumaris can only tell us if there is suchurgency to reform or 'modernize' the insti-tution or not. They surely know more aboutthe tradition and the whole experience ofbeing transformed from an ordinary childto the post of Kumari and back to being anormal human being. Our retired 'goddess-es' must come out, and speak for the causeof the 'divinity' themselves.

To sum it up, the Supreme Court ordershould be taken in a positive light, andthose who called it a 'landmark decision'have rightly said so. The Kumari-traditionshould never be discontinued, but theinstitution should possess the courage tomove along the redefining times of thetwenty-first century. People are in nomood to stop worshipping the 'living-god-dess' but there is a need to reform andreconsider the whole custom. We haveexpressed a desire to benefit the child, forher better future. The 'goddess' will surelybless us for all our concerns and initiativesto ensure the child a normal childhoodand a better life. May, Goddess Kumaribless us all, especially the child she haschosen to be.

Thinking new

Nepali Theatre as a see it - ByDr Abhi Subedi Publishers - Arrohan, GurukulPrice - NRS 225,Edition - First, Pages- 237

ISBN: 99946-998-9-x

All the world's a stage; And allthe men and women merelyplayers", said William

Shakespeare in the pastoral comedyAs You Like It. This cannot be lesstrue in case of Dr Abhi Subedi,except that he loves to play differentroles in life with a same sense ofmastery and perfection. With thepublication of Nepali Theatre as ISee It, the poet-cum-artcritic-cum-playwright has added a new perspec-tive to the study of Nepali theatricalheritage.

The book, says Dr Subedi, is anoutcome of his personal efforts toperceive the structural forms of theperformative culture of Nepal and itsinfluence on Nepali theatre. Neatlydivided into nine sections, the bookcommences with an overview of the

performance culture. The history ofperformance culture in Nepal datesback to time immemorial, to thetime of the Lichavvi and Malla kingswhen the Kathmandu city waslargely inhabited by the Newars.There is no term to describe the tra-dition of performance culture, eventhough it was manifest in both tan-gible -- and intangible -- artistic andcultural forms. These formschanged into newer forms as theypassed from one generation toanother. Dr Subedi's quest as anartist was to study the differentforms of performance tradition andthe way they were metamorphosedinto newer forms.

Although a narrative of DrSubedi's own journey as a play-wright, the book combines histori-cal narratives with autobiographicalelements. Chapter- Two, Three,Four and Five deals more with his-

tory of Nepali theatre while Chapter-6 onward is autobiographical. DrSubedi begins with a generaloverview of the heritage of Nepalitheatre that has been largely shapedby performance tradition. He makesextensive use of the term NepalMandala, which incorporates theart, architecture, dramaturgy,music, dance and performance cul-ture of the historic cities ofKathmandu, Bhaktapur andLalitpur. For Dr Subedi, one uniquefeature of the Nepal Mandala is thatall forms of art that exist here projecta strong sense of performance. Theplaywright sees dynamism not onlyin the songs and dances accompany-ing street festivals, but also in thestone sculptures surrounding theancient Chagunarayan temple,paintings, murals and many sucharchitectural designs.

Dr Subedi's approach to the his-tory of Nepali theatre is scientificand systematic - he first states hishypothesis, then goes on assimilat-ing facts and data, tracks down his-

torical narratives, incorporates find-ings of foreign and domestic schol-ars, and finally sets his conclusion.He begins his theatrical journeyright from the medieval ages; studiesthe influence of Parsi theatre andtheatricians such as Keshar Man

Tuladhar, Master Ratnadas Prakash,Hari Prasad Rimal and BekhNarayan Maharjan; and then allots awhole chapter for revolutionarydramatist Bal Krishna Sama and hiscontributions in bringing theatrefrom the courtyards of the Ranarulers to the public. In Chapter-5, hediscusses the influence of natural-ism, realism and surrealism inNepali theatre and experimentalplays written by writers such asBhim Nidhi Tiwari, Satya Mohan

Joshi and Madhav Ghimere. One thing remarkable about Dr

Subedi is that he knows how to jux-tapose subtle comments while talk-ing about lighter issues in a leisurelymood. For instance, in the sub-unitStreet March as Power of

Performance of Chapter-2, he istalking about the heritage of traveland the carnivalesque mode ofdemonstration during the Newarstreet performance. Out of blue, hebrings in King Prithivi Narayan Shahand explains how things changedafter he rode the chariot that wasmeant for King Jaya Prakash Mallawho fled after his kingdom wasinvaded by a Shah king from thehouse of Gorkhas. Dr Subedi contin-ues with his subtle comments as heexplains how the streets ofKathmandu are being less used forritualistic celebration and more forbroader political demonstrationsthese days!

That is not to say that he isagainst political demonstrations,however. In the same unit, he nos-talgically remembers the 1990 revolution and the way streetsbecame a stage for a political showthat heralded democracy. Dr Subedi's description is sure toremind us of the recent April upris-ing that paved the way for the for-mation of a new democratic state.Talking of streets, Dr Subedi hasdevoted an entire chapter to studythe relation of theatre and streets.He deals with the theme of traveland street elsewhere as well. InChapter-2, for instance, there is aseparate sub-section called Heritageof Street, where the playwright discusses how the two tropes "jour-

ney" and "street" have shaped thetradition of Nepali theatre. He haselaborately described how peopleacted dramas on streets, infusingthem with dances and songs. Says DrSubedi, "On streets gods travel inpalanquins carried by followers;kings traveled on chariots, firstRolls-Royce cars that came on peo-ple's backs to Kathmandu ran onstreets here raising clouds of dust…the Rana chiefs riding horses anddrawing swords stand by the sides ofthe streets as though they were con-stantly peering down at the passersby."

The playwright has beautifullydeciphered the relation of travel andarchitectural space in the sub-sec-tion Rituals of Travel andArchitectural Space of Chapter-2.According to Dr Subedi, the streetmarches in ancient Newari festivalssuch as Gaijatra and Indrajatrawere to pass "in front of houses thathad windows open to streets." Here,the open windows served as a stagefrom where the spectators couldview the street performance. Atother times, the stage included royalcourtyards such as the square atHanumandhoka designed to accom-modate a huge audience, or raisedplatforms (dabalis) constructed invast open spaces for public con-sumption of plays.

In a nutshell, Dr Subedi's new book on theatre is a good readfor Westerners as well as Easternersand domestic lovers of theatre.When I first got hold of the book, I was highly impressed by the color-ful jacket, the smooth foliage, and the beautiful arrangement of photos.However, Dr Subedi needs to devotea few quiet hours to correct some of the minor typos when the next edition of the volume comesout.

Reviewed by Monica [email protected]

Nepali theatre and performance culture

Kumari: The arresting goddess

The street marches

in ancient Newari

festivals such as

Gaijatra and

Indrajatra were

designed to pass

"in front of houses

that had windows

open to streets."

Here, the open win-

dows served as a

stage from where

the spectators

could view the

street performance.

By SALIK SHAH

page_4tkp.qxd 11/11/2006 9:29 PM Page 1