kudrinski jaeger egt
TRANSCRIPT
Evolutionary Game Theory and Linguistic Typology: a Case Study
Gerhard Jager
CONSIDER all possible case marking types that only use case splits induced by the contrast between pronouns and full NPs
THE MAIN FUNCTION OF CASE MARKING is to disambiguate: enable the hearer to identify the argument roles A (agent, the transitive subject) and O (the direct object)
SPEAKER wants to disambiguate and use as few case morphemes as possible
SPEAKER STRATEGY:
any function S from M(eaning) to F(orm)
HEARER wants to correctly understand the utterance
HEARER STRATEGY:
any function H from F(orm) to M(eaning)
COMMUNICATION is successful if the hearer (H) recovers the intended meaning m from the observed form
SPEAKER UTILITY:
Here k formalizes the priorities of the speaker
HEARER UTILITY
WE ARE DEALING with elementary transitive clauses: two NPs, A(gent) and O(bject), both may be either p(ronoun) or n(oun)
NATURE chooses the word order A-O and O-A with a 50% probability each. Furthermore nature specifies which of the two NPs is A and which is O, and whether they are n or p
CASE MARKING patterns (speaker strategy):
1) Pronominal subjects
2) Non-pronominal subjects
3) Pronominal objects
4) Non-pronominal objects
EXAMPLES: zzaz (English), eezz (Basque)
16 case patterns
eeaz zzaz
eeza zzza
eezz zzzz
eeaa zzaa
zeaz ezaz
zeza ezza
zezz ezzz
zeaa ezaa
eeaz zzaz
eeza zzza
eezz zzzz
eeaa zzaa
zeaz ezaz
zeza ezza
zezz ezzz
zeaa ezaa
eeaz zzaz
eeza zzza
eezz zzzz
eeaa zzaa
zeaz ezaz
zeza ezza
zezz ezzz
zeaa ezaa
HEARER always interprets e -> A and a -> O
AMBIGIOUS clause types:
p/z – p/z
n/z – n/z
p/z – n/z
n/z – p/z
HEARER strategies only differ with respect to the meaning they assign to 3. and 4.
1. p/z – p/z (not relevant: the same payoff)
2. n/z – n/z (not relevant: the same payoff)
3. p/z – n/z
4. n/z – p/z
-> 4 possible strategies: AA AO OA OO
zzaz/AO zzaz/OA zzaz/OO zzaz/AA
zzza/AO zzza/OA zzza/OO zzza/AA
eezz/AO eezz/OA eezz/OO eezz/AA
zzzz/AO zzzz/OA zzzz/OO zzzz/AA
zzaa/AO zzaa/OA zzaa/OO zzaa/AA
zeaz/AO zeaz/OA zeaz/OO zeaz/AA
zezz/AO zezz/OA zezz/OO zezz/AA
ezzz/AO ezzz/OA ezzz/OO ezzz/AA
FOR small values of k
zzaz/AO zzaz/OA zzaz/OO zzaz/AA
zzza/AO zzza/OA zzza/OO zzza/AA
eezz/AO eezz/OA eezz/OO eezz/AA
zzzz/AO zzzz/OA zzzz/OO zzzz/AA
zzaa/AO zzaa/OA zzaa/OO zzaa/AA
zeaz/AO zeaz/OA zeaz/OO zeaz/AA
zezz/AO zezz/OA zezz/OO zezz/AA
ezzz/AO ezzz/OA ezzz/OO ezzz/AA
*strict NE *non-strict NE
FOR larger values of k
zzaz/AO zzaz/OA zzaz/OO zzaz/AA
zzza/AO zzza/OA zzza/OO zzza/AA
eezz/AO eezz/OA eezz/OO eezz/AA
zzzz/AO zzzz/OA zzzz/OO zzzz/AA
zzaa/AO zzaa/OA zzaa/OO zzaa/AA
zeaz/AO zeaz/OA zeaz/OO zeaz/AA
zezz/AO zezz/OA zezz/OO zezz/AA
ezzz/AO ezzz/OA ezzz/OO ezzz/AA
*strict NE
FOR larger values of k
zzaz/AO zzaz/OA zzaz/OO zzaz/AA
zzza/AO zzza/OA zzza/OO zzza/AA
eezz/AO eezz/OA eezz/OO eezz/AA
zzzz/AO zzzz/OA zzzz/OO zzzz/AA
zzaa/AO zzaa/OA zzaa/OO zzaa/AA
zeaz/AO zeaz/OA zeaz/OO zeaz/AA
zezz/AO zezz/OA zezz/OO zezz/AA
ezzz/AO ezzz/OA ezzz/OO ezzz/AA
*strict NE
FOR very large values of k
zzaz/AO zzaz/OA zzaz/OO zzaz/AA
zzza/AO zzza/OA zzza/OO zzza/AA
eezz/AO eezz/OA eezz/OO eezz/AA
zzzz/AO zzzz/OA zzzz/OO zzzz/AA
zzaa/AO zzaa/OA zzaa/OO zzaa/AA
zeaz/AO zeaz/OA zeaz/OO zeaz/AA
zezz/AO zezz/OA zezz/OO zezz/AA
ezzz/AO ezzz/OA ezzz/OO ezzz/AA
*strict NE
THE SYSTEMS that very excluded are typologically unattested or at least very rare
EIGHT SYSTEMS that give rise to an NE in some configuration are present
zzaz English zzza Nganasan (only!)
zezz Adyghe ezzz Wakhi (only!)
zeaz Dyrbal eezz Basque (rare)
zzzz Bantu zzaa (rare)
EVOLUTIONARY Game Theory (EGT): populations of players that are programmed for a certain strategy
PLAYERS replicate and pass on their strategy to their offsprings
But grammars are not transmitted via genetic but via cultural inheritance
replicator dynamics -> imitation dynamics
IMITATION DYNAMICS:
Players are not mortal and have no offsprings
The probability that a certain strategy is imitated is positively correlated to the gain in average utility -> successful strategies will tend to spread, unsuccessful will die out
A strategy pair is evolutionary stable
iff it is a Strict Nash Equilibrium
The NEs using a pure case marking strategy (zzaa, eezz) are never strict -> not stable
zzza/OA and ezzz/OA each coexist with a well-attested SNE, that have higher average utility
-> only four strategies are evolutionary stable: split ergativity, differential subject marking, differential object marking, and absence of case marking;
exceptions should be diachronicaly unstable