killing women to curb population
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Killing Women to Curb Population
1/2
november 15, 2014
Economic & PoliticalWeekly EPW november 15, 2014 vol xlix no 46 7
Killing Women to Curb Population
The Chhattisgarh tragedy will repeat unless governments accept womens rights.
Alaparoscopic tubectomy is supposed to be a simple oper-
ation. Yet in the hands of some surgeons, it would
not be an exaggeration to call it butchery. For what else
can you say when 83 poor women are coerced, enticed, duped
to go to a sterilisation camp in a disused hospital in Takhatpur
block of Bilaspur district in Chhattisgarh. There they are
lined up on a dirty floor, and within five hours, surgeons
operate on them and tie up their fallopian tubes. Within two
days, eight of them are dead, another three die a day later and
20 are critical. The doctor who headed the entire operation, a
man feted by the state government earlier in the year for hav-
ing personally done 50,000 tubectomies, has been arrested
and the families of the dead women given cash compensation.
But does this deal with the policy that inevitably results in
such atrocities?
What happened in Chhattisgarh is a reminder of the continu-
ing callous approach of the centre and state governmentstowards what is euphemistically termed population stabilisation.
Despite years of struggle to establish that population growth is
about people, and principally about women, and that their
rights and health must be the central pivot on which any policy
is shaped, we still continue with these barbaric sterilisation
camps where poor women are treated as little more than cattle.
That the men who operated on them should even be called
surgeons is questionable given that they wilfully violated all
guidelines, including those of the Supreme Court setting a limit
of 30 operations per day and only 10 per instrument. Instead, they
performed 83 tubectomies within five hours, or an operation every
four minutes or so. Only three laparoscopes were used for this,
obviating any chance of mandatory sterilisation. The womens
prior health condition was not checked, they were not kept back
for four hours after the operation as is required and there was
no follow-up visit within 40 hours. When complications set in,
death was inevitable.
Horrific as are these details, they represent only part of a
much larger and murkier story being played out in many other
states. These tragedies occur with alarming regularity because
India has abandoned both international and national commit-
ments to adopt a humane and gender-sensitive approach
towards population growth. After the Emergency, when forcedsterilisation led not just to Indira Gandhis rout in the elections
but also posed a serious setback to all health programmes, some
rethinking had begun. This culminated in the 1994 United
Nations International Conference on Population and Develop-
ment (ICPD) in Cairo, Egypt where India along with 178 coun-
tries made a commitment to anchor all population policies in
womens reproductive rights and health and gender equity.
Following this, the Indian government specifically agreed to
discard its earlier policy of giving monetary incentives and
setting targets and instead acknowledged the need to give a ll
women access to safe contraception. In 2000, the National
Population Policy adopted under the previous National Demo-
cratic Alliance (NDA) government also reflected this approach
and went further by linking education, sanitation, supply of
safe drinking water, housing and womens empowerment to
any strategy to deal with the growing population.
Yet today, one in every five women in India does not have
access to safe contraception, and the regime of targets and
incentives continues unabated in many states. This NDAgovern-ment appears to have no memory of what its predecessor accepted.
This is evident in some of the remarks made by the recently
replaced Union Health Minister Harsh Vardhan who spoke of
reviving the 1992 bill that will disqualify MPs and MLAswith
more than two children, a law that one presumed had been
buried. A similar law that applies to elected members of
panchayats exists in Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Odisha,
Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh. These states also continue
to hold sterilisation camps, as do Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.
And every now and then stories similar to the recent scandal
emanating from Chhattisgarh are reported.
The common factor in all these inhuman interventions is the
complete lack of any respect for the rights of the women under
the knife. They are always poor women, often tribal; they are
lured by the monetary incentive provided; they are not in-
formed about the nature of the procedure, or of possible compli-
cations following it; and many of them are unaware that the
procedure is terminal.
Where does this fit within the concept of reproductive choice
and rights, that the Government of India is supposed to have
accepted more than 20 years ago? And where is gender equality
when only women are being compelled to take the responsibility
for limiting families when a vasectomy is much simpler and aless dangerous terminal method? There are roughly 19 times more
tubectomies performed each year as compared to vasectomies.
-
8/10/2019 Killing Women to Curb Population
2/2
EDITORIALS
november 15, 2014 vol xlix no 46 EPW Economic & PoliticalWeekly8
Even if, under pressure from public anger, the Chhattisgarh
government moves against the health officials responsible for
this atrocity, there will be no end to such incidents unless there
is a clear and full understanding of the concept of womens re-
productive rights and health and its centrality for all health and
population programmes.