kenyanthropus platyops - cheatsheet
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 Kenyanthropus Platyops - Cheatsheet
1/2
Kenyanthropus platyopsTimespan: 3.3 3.5 mya
Region: West Turkana, East Africa
Specimens: 2 individuals
Discovered: Leakey 2001
Holotype: KNM -WT-4000
Lineage: suggested ancestor to
H. rudolfensis
Environment: Woodland
Diet: Unknown
Speculation/theories:
facial features show that orthonagthism evolved earlier than prev assumed;
new genus increases diversity in Pliocene (as expected); diet-driven adaptive radiation
affinity w/ H. rudolfensis strong, some suggest reclassification as K. rudolfensis
taxonomic classification highly controversial, many suggest KNM-WT-4000 too distorted to
diagnose; suggest simplyA. afarensis (White 2003)
D I A G N O S T I C F E AT U R E S
Cranium size w/in A. afarensis & A. africanus range
molar enamel comparable to A. anamensis & A. afarensis
buccolingually narrow M2
thick molar enamel
tepmoral bone w/ more cylindrical
articular eminence
deeper mandibular fossa
similar facial architecture (incl flat orthognathic nasoalveolar clivus)
more primitive nasal and neurocranial morphology
lacks derived shot nasal bones & everted lateral nasal margin
cranial
tall malar region
zygomaticoaveolar crest low & curved
nasal cavity entrance stepped palate roof: thin, flexed anteriorly to incisive foramen
tympanic element mediolaterally long & lacking petrous
crest
transversely flat midface
external acoustic porus small
absence of occipital/marginal venous system
moderate subnasal prognathism
nasoalveolar clivus long & flat w/out marked
juga
maxillary zygomatic process: anterior surface
positioned over premolars & more vertically-
oriented
dentition
M1 & M2 small crowns
I 1 & I2 roots near equal in size
P3 & P4 3-rooted
M1 & M2 thick enamel
incisor alveoli parallel w/ bicanine line
differs from
A. anamensis,A. africanus,
A. garhi
differs from
A. afarensis:more derived
facially but moreprimitive cranial
features
differs from
Ar. ramidus {
}compared to
H. rudolfensis
Lacks derived facial
features of
P. aethiopicus, P. boisei, &
P. robustus
Lacks derived cranial
features ofH. erectus &
H. sapiens
-
8/2/2019 Kenyanthropus Platyops - Cheatsheet
2/2
K E Y S P E C I M E N S
KNM-WT-4000 cranium, highly distorted. Preserved in 2 pieces (neurocranium w/ superior
& lateral orbital margins but cranial base missing; and face)
Aprox 3.5 mya
Cranial capacity of 350 cc (estimating difficult due to condition of skull)
Found w/ well-preserved temporal bone, two partial maxillae, & isolated teeth (not yet
assigned to K. platyops)
KNM-WT-38350 partial left maxilla, found in 1998
Aprox 3.3 mya
M A J O R S I T E S
Lomekwi, West Turkana, Kenya localities between Lomekwi & Topernawi river drainages in
northern Kenya
KNM-WT-4000 found in Kataboi Member, below Tulu Bor Tuff & above Locochot Tuff
B I B L I O G R A P H Y
Ackerman, R. and R. Smith (2007) The Macroevolution of our Ancient Lineage: What We Know
(or Think We Know) about Early Hominin Diversity, Evolutionary Biology34: 72-85
Begun, D. (2004) The Earliest Hominins Is Less More?, Science 303: 1478-1450
Gee, H. (2001) Return to the planet of the apes, Nature 412: 131-132
Gibbons, Anne (2002) In search of the first hominids, Science 295: 1214-1219
Cameron, D. (2003). Early hominin speciation at the Plio/Pleistocene transition. HOMO-Journal
of Comparative Human Biology, 54(1), 128.
Collard, M, and B. Wood (2007) Hominin homoiology: An assessment of the impact of
phenotypic plasticity on phylogenetic analyses of humans and their fossil relatives,
Journal of Human Evolution 52: 573-584
Leakey, M. G., et al (2001). New hominin genus from eastern Africa shows diverse middle
Pliocene lineages. Nature, 410(6827), 433-40
Lieberman, D. E. (2001). Another face in our family tree, Nature 410
White, T. (2003). Early Hominids Diversity or Distortion?, Science 473(2001), 4-6.