k-12 literacy:
DESCRIPTION
K-12 Literacy:. The Big Rock in Learning. The mission of the Hillsboro School District. is to ensure each student graduates prepared to succeed and contribute in a global society by engaging our diverse learners in challenging, personalized program of educational excellence. Demographics. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
K-12 LITERACY:
The Big Rock in Learning
THE MISSION OF THE HILLSBORO SCHOOL DISTRICTis to ensure each student graduates prepared to succeed and contribute in a global society by engaging our diverse learners in challenging, personalized program of educational excellence.
DEMOGRAPHICSYearTotal Pop
Hispanic White Black Asian
1996 15,898
2,41815.2
%
12,514 78.7%
182 1.1%
697 4.4%
2000 18,081
3,632 20.1%
12,930 71.5%
291 1.6%
1,102 6.1%
2005 19,562
5,379 27.5%
12,233 63.5%
437 2.2%
1,386 7.1%
2008 20,251
6,237 30.8%
11,794 58.2%
5282.6%
1,542 7.6%
FREE-REDUCED LUNCH RATEYear Numbers Percentage
1996 4505 28.21%
2000 5034 27.88%
2009 8802 43.7%
2007 TREND LINES
Drop out % by Ethnicity
His-panic
White Asian Black0
10203040506070
58.1
36.3
3.2 1.6
Dropouts
Population % by Ethnicity
Hispan
icWhit
eAs
ian Black
010203040506070
28.6
61
7.3 2.5
Population
THE PROBLEMS From 5th grade on, students are expected to
read 10,000 new words each year in their texts (Nagey & Anderson, 1986).
More than 8 million students in 4th -12th grades are struggling readers (USDoE 2003).
40% of high school students cannot read well enough to benefit from their textbooks (NAEP).
Of the six million K-12 students receiving special education services, estimates say up to 80% receive services in reading.
THE PROBLEMS Each year 383,000 students drop out of
middle school and high school (NCES, 2000).
Over 75% of surveyed students who dropped out indicated that difficulty with reading was a major contributing factor (Lyon, 2001).
26% of these students do not have minimal reading skills for daily life (Grigg, Daane, Jin, & Campbell, 2003).
11Gidlroy & Isaacson 2005
THE RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENT READING The majority of adolescents with
poor reading skills need instruction in basic phonological awareness and decoding (Moats, 2001).
Reading fluency is highly correlated with reading comprehension (National Reading Panel, 2000).
Poor readers often lack depth, breadth, or specificity in word knowledge (Beck & McKeown).
12Gidlroy & Isaacson 2005
THE RESEARCH After the 4th grade, most vocabulary is
learned through reading, with a gain of several thousand words per year (Moats 2001; Stanovich, 1986).
Students with reading problems often lack effective and efficient comprehension strategies (Moats, 2001).
Adolescent readers need to learn about different genre, text organizational patterns and structures, as well as literary devices (Moats, 2001).
K - PSF 37
2nd – Oral Reading Fluency 90
3rd – 215 or higher in OAKS
6th - Oral Reading Fluency 160
9th – Oral Reading Fluency 190
HS – AP/IB enrollment increase 10%
HS – PSAT Rd.- 46
8th – 233 or higher in OAKS
OAKS SCORES AND PERCENTILES
3rd GradeStandard Score
%tile 4th GradeStandard score
%tile 5th Grade Standard Score
%tile
Exceeds 218 65 223 61 230 76
Meets 204-217 16-62
211-222 17-58
218-229 26-73
Nearly Meets
199-203 9-13 205-210 8-15 209-217 8-23
Does not Meet
198 8 204 7 208 7
OAKS SCORES AND PERCENTILES
6th GradeStandard Score
%tile 7th GradeStandard score
%tile 8th Grade Standard Score
%tile
Exceeds 234 76 239 75 241 80
Meets 222-233 28-73
227-238 28-71
231-240 37-77
Nearly Meets
214-221 10-25
219-226 9-24 224-230 16-33
Does not Meet
213 9 218 8 223 14
READINGKindergarten Phonemic Segmentation Fluency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
200620072008
K PSF 37
READING2nd Grade Oral Reading Fluency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
200620072008
K ORF 90
READING3rd Grade Exceeding Oregon State Assessment
All St
uden
tsWhit
e
Hispan
icAs
ian
Africa
n Ameri
can
Eccon
. Dis. LEP
Migran
tSp
.Ed.
TAG
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%
200620072008
215 +
READING6th Grade Oral Reading Fluency Score 137 Mid-Year
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
200720082009
K ORF 160
PSAT10th Grade All Students
Reading Math28% 38%
47 49
Percentage Meeting the Goal Score or Higher2009 Goal
Reading K-3READING K-3 VS. 4-12
Acquire strategies for “decoding” unfamiliar wordsBuild “sight word vocabulary” of many thousands of words
Learn to coordinate skills for fluent reading of textBegin extension of vocabulary beyond oral language limits
Acquire variety of strategies for enhancing comprehension, or repairing it when it breaks down
Develop or maintain a positive attitude about reading and view it as an important skill for learning and for pleasure
Reading 4-12READING K-3 VS. 4-12
Extend “sight vocabulary” to unfamiliar words in increasingly challenging text
Learning meanings of thousands of new words – vocabulary expansion
Increasingly detailed knowledge of text structures and genres
Expansion of content knowledge in many domainsThinking and reasoning skills increase
Reading specific comprehension strategies become more complex
100
110
120
130
Cor
rect
Wor
ds p
er M
inut
e
140
150
6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
F W S F W S F WS
Correct Words per Minute on Grade Level Text160
18 WPM
22 WPM 23 WPM
Tindal, Hasbrouck, & Jones, 2005
Text difficulty increases
Text difficulty increases
Primary Characteristics of Struggling Readers in Middle and High School
They are almost always less fluent readers—their sight word vocabularies many thousands of words smaller than average readersUsually know the meanings of fewer wordsUsually have less conceptual/factual knowledgeAre almost always less skilled in using strategies to enhance comprehension or repair it when it breaks downWill typically not enjoy reading or choose to read for pleasure
They sometimes have not mastered basic knowledge and strategies required for decoding unfamiliar words
LITERACY “the ability to identify, understand, interpret, create, communicate, compute, and use printed material associated with varying concepts.
Literacy involves a continuum of learning to enable an individual to achieve his or her goals, to develop his or her knowledge and potential, and to participate fully in the wider society.”
SYSTEMS THAT MOVE THE ROCKS
Feeder Team Learning Communities
Effective Behavior and Instruction Support System
Professional Learning Communities
Research and Development
K-12 Literacy PlanPositive Behavior Intervention Systems and Attendance Plan
Literacy Leadership Team PBS/CARE Team
EBISS Leadership Team
Investing in School Competency and Capacity in Behavior Support Systems, Data and Practice
Investing in Literacy Systems, Data and Practices
EBISS “Big Idea”Outcomes, Systems, Data, Practice
We can effectively teach all children. Administer universal benchmark assessments
three times a year. Deliver instruction from a core program for all. Use research-based, scientifically validated
curriculum, interventions, and instruction. Use a multi-tier model of service delivery. Intervene early. Use data to make instructional decisions. Monitor student progress to inform instruction. Increase time and intensity of instruction when
students fall behind.
CORE PRINCIPLES OF OUR K-12 LITERACY FRAMEWORK
HOW ARE WE DOING?
3rd Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
10th Grade
78% 78% 71% 72% 71%56% 65%
80% 82%73% 74% 73%
74% 70%
Total for the District2007-2008 2008-2009
HOW ARE WE DOING?
3rd Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
10th Grade
87% 88% 82% 82% 82%69% 77%
87% 91%83% 84% 84%
75%81%
White2007-2008 2008-2009
HOW ARE WE DOING?
3rd Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
10th Grade
62% 60%49% 51% 48%
29% 37%
68% 68%
52% 54% 50%
40%42%
Hispanic2007-2008 2008-2009
HOW ARE WE DOING?
3rd Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
10th Grade
64% 65% 56% 57% 54%36% 43%
72% 71%60% 60% 58%
48% 51%
Economically Disadvantaged 2007-2008 2008-2009
Skills and Strategies: Transferring from Literacy Instruction to Content InstructionoBreaking Down Complex Words and
Acquiring New Sight Words
oFluency
oVocabulary
oComprehension
Academic Systems Behavioral Systems
1-5% 1-5%
5-10%
5-10%
Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based•High Intensity•Of longer duration
Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based•Intense, durable procedures
Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response
Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response
80-90% 80-90%
Universal Interventions•All students•Preventive, proactive
Universal Interventions•All settings, all students•Preventive, proactive
Implementation View
Attention, Effort, Precision
SYST
EMS
PRACTICES
DATASupporting
Staff Learning
SupportingStudent Behavior &
Academics
OUTCOMES/GOALS
Supporting Social Competence &Academic Achievement
SupportingDecisionMaking
Feeder Region
Learning Communitie
s
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EBISS Grant Safe Schools/Healthy Schools Grant Oregon leadership Institute Nike Leadership and Literacy Grant Spanish Literacy Research Project First Grade Reading Enhancements
Research Universal Screen Research Project Middle School Intervention Research K-8 Math Project
PLC: Increasing Student AchievementCore standards
Common Assessments
Data Teams
What do you need toteach?
How do you know
learningoccurred?
Data Driven Leadership and Decision Making
If you have made mistakes…there is always another chance for you…you may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call “failure” is not the falling down, but the staying down.
Mary Pickford