A. THE LAWYER AND SOCIETY

a. CANON 1i. Soriano vs. Dizon, A.C. No. 6792, 25 January 2006ii. Quijano vs. Bartolabac, A.C. No. 5649, 27 January 2006iii. Tomlin vs. Moya, A.C. No. 6971, 23 February 2006iv. Malhabour vs. Sarmiento, A.C. No. 54171, 31 March 2006v. Bautista vs. Bernabe, A.C. No. 6963, 9 February 2006vi. Lim-Santigo vs. Sagucio, A.C. No.6705, 31 March 2006vii. Lingan vs. Calubaquib, A.C. No. 5377, 15 June 2006viii. Imson vs.Souweha vs. Rondez, Adm. Case No.3961, 18 September 1997ix. Delos Reyes vs. Aznar, A.C. No.1334, 28 November 1989x. Ui vs. Bonifacio, A.C. No. 3319, 8 June 2000xi. Daras vs. Paras, A.C. No. 5333, 18 October 2000xii. Nunga vs. Viray, Adm. Case No.4758, 30 April 1999xiii. Cordova vs. Cordova, A.C. No.3249, 29 November 1989xiv. Toledo vs. Abalos, adm. Case No. 5141, 29 September 1999xv. Co vs. Bernardino, Adm. Case No. 3919, 28 January 1998xvi. Sebastian vs. Calis, Adm. Case No. 5118, 9 September 1999xvii. In Re: Lontok, 7 April 1922xviii. In Re: Gutierrez, Adm. Case No. L-363, 31 July 1962xix. In Re: Valloces, Adm. Case No. 439, 30 September 1982xx. Avilla vs. Reyes, A.M. No. 01-34-CA-J, 23 January 2006xxi. Santayana vs. Alampay, A.C. No. 5878, 21March 2005xxii. Quiambao vs. Bamba, A.C. No. 6708, 25 August 2005xxiii. Pineda vs. Macapagal, A.C No. 6026, 29 November 2005

b. CANON 2i. Canon 14, Rule 14.03ii. Rule 138, Sec. 27iii. Khan vs. Simbillo, A.C. No. 5299, 19 August 2003

c. CANON 3i. Paas vs. Almarvez, A.M. No. P-03-1690, 4 April 2003ii. San Jose Homeowners Association, c. vs. Romanillos, A.C. No. 5580, 15 June 2005iii. In Re: Tagorda, G.R. No. 32329, 23 March 1929iv. Ulep vs. Legal Clinic, Bar Matter No. 33, 17 June 1993v. Canons of Professional Ethics, Canon 27 and 46vi. Dacanay vs. Baker & McKenzie, Adm Case No. 2131, 10 May 1985vii. Philippines Constitution

1. Art. 6, Sec. 142. Art. 7, Sec. 133. Art. 9, Sec. 2

viii. Republic Act 6731, Sec. 7 (b)

d. CANON 4i. Magno vs. Velasco Jacoba, A.C. No. 6296, 22 November 2005

e. CANON 5i. Williams vs. Enriquez, A.C. No. 6353. February 27, 2006ii. Cuevas vs. Bais Steel Corporation, G.R. No. 142689,17 October 2002iii. Santiago vs. Rafanan, A.C. No. 6252, 5 October 2004

f. CANON 6i. Republic Act 6731, Sec. 4ii. Pimentel vs. Llorente, Adm. Case No. 4680, 29 August 2000iii. Suarez vs. Platon, G.R. No. 46371, 7 February 1940iv. Igoy vs. Soriano, A.M. No.2001-9-SC, 11 October 2001v. Ali vs. Bubong, A.C. No. 4018, 8 March 2005vi. Vitriolo vs. Dasig, A.C. No. 4984, 1 April 2003vii. Huyssen vs. Gutierrez, A.C. No. 6707, 24 March 2006viii. PCGG vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 151809-12, 12 April 2005

B. THE LAWYER AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION

a. CANON 7i. PAGCOR vs. Carandang, A.C. No. 5700, 30 January 2006

ii. Re: 1989 Elections of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines, Bar Matter No. 491, 6 October 1989

iii. Santos, Jr. vs. Llamas, Adm. Case No. 4749, 20 January 2000iv. Leda vs. Tabang, Adm. Case No.2505, 21 February 1992v. Zoreta vs. Simpliciano, A.C. No. 6492, 18 November 2004

vi. Tan vs. Sabandal, Bar Matter No. 44, 24 February 2992vii. Macarrubo vs. Macarrubo, A.C. No. 6148, 27 February 2004

b. CANON 8i. Cruz vs. Cabrera, A.C. No. 5737, 25 October 2004

ii. Yared vs. Ilarde, G.R. No. 114732, 1 August 2000iii. Nuñez vs. Astorga, A.C. No. 6131, 28 February 2005iv. Dallong-Galiciano vs.. Castro, A.C. No. 6396, 25 October 2005v. Likong vs. Lim, Adm. Case No. 3149, 17 August 1994

c. CANON 9i. Cambaliza vs. Cristal-Tenorio, A.C. No. 6290, 14 July 2004

ii. Alawl vs. Alauya, A.M. SDC-97-2-P, 24 February 1997iii. Five J Taxl vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 111474,22 August 1994

C. THE LAWYER AND THE COURTS

a. CANON 10i. Jimenez vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 144449, 23 March 2006ii.Perea vs. Amadro, A.C. No. 5246, 2 May 2006iii. Asa vs. Castillo, A.C. No. 6501, 31 August 2006iv. Maligaya vs. Doronilla, A.C. No. 6198, 15 September 2006v. Masinsin vs. Albano, G.R. No. 86421, 31 May 1994vi. Santos vs. Paguio, A.M. No. MTJ-93-781, 16 November 1993vii. Libit vs. Oliva, A.C. No. 2837, 7 October 1994viii. Bongalonta vs. Castillo, CBD Case No. 176, 20 January 1995ix. Insular Life Issurance Co. Employees Association vs. Insular Life Assurance Co., G.R. No. L-

25291, 30 January 1971x. Comelec vs. Noynay, G.R. No. 132365, 9 July 1998xi. Adez Realty vs. CS, G.R. No. 100643, 30 October 1992xii.Cobb-Perez vs. Lantin, G.R. No. L-22320, 29 July 1968

b. CANON 11i. Lacurom vs. Jacoba, A.C. No. 5921, 10 March 2006ii. Tiongco vs. Savillo, A.M. No. RTJ-02-1719, 31 March 2006iii. In re Sotto, 82 Phil. 595 (1949)iv. Guerrero v. Villamor, G.R. Nos. 82238-42, 13 November 1989v. De Gracia v. Warden of Makati, G.R. No. L-42032, 9 January 1976vi. Fernadez v. Bello, 107 Phil. 1140 (1960)vii. Sangalang v. Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. No. 71169, 30 August 1989viii. Penticostes v. Hidalgo, Adm. Matter Nos. RTJ – 89 -331, 28 September 1990ix. Mocles v. Maravilla, Adm. Matter No. MTJ – 93 -873,14 December 1994x. Wicker vs. Arcangel, G.R. No. 112869,29 January 1996xi. Const., Art. VIII, s. 6xii. Maceda v. Vasquez, G.R. No. 102781, 22 April 1993

c. CANON 12i. Lim vs. Montano, A.C. No. 5653, 27 February 2006

ii. Maronilla vs. Jorda, A.C. No. 6973, 13 February 2006iii. Garcia vs. Revilla, A.C. No. 7056. September 13, 2006iv. Rule 138, s. 20v. Const., art. III, sec. 16

vi. Economic Insurance Co. v. Uy Realty Co., G.R. No. L – 28056, 31 August 1970vii. Li Kim Tho v. Sanchez, 82 Phil. 776 (1949)

viii. Aguinaldo v. Aguinaldo, G.R. No. L – 30362, November 26, 1970

ix. Afurong v. Aquino, Adm. Case No. 1571, September 23, 1999x. Garcia v. Francisco, Adm. Case No. 3923, March 30, 1993

xi. Benguet Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Flores, A.C. No. 4058, 12 March 1998xii. PNB v. Uy Teng Piao, 57 Phil. 337 (1932)

d. CANON 13i. Nestle Phil. V. Sanchez, G.R. No. L-75209, 30 September 1987

ii. Lantoria v. Bunyi, Adm. Case No. 1769, 8 June 1992iii. Cruz v. Salva, 105 Phil. 1151 (1959)iv. In re Almacen, G.R. No. L – 27654, 18 February 1970v. Maglasang v. People, G.R