japan: promoting inclusive growth for an ageing society · japan : promoting inclusive growth for...
TRANSCRIPT
OECDOECD Economics
JAPAN : PROMOTING INCLUSIVE GROWTH FOR AN
AGEING SOCIETY
Research Institute of Economy, Trade and IndustryTokyo, 22 June 2018
Randall S. JonesHead of Japan/Korea Desk, OECD
• Japan’s economic outlook• Long-term challenges facing Japan• Achieving fiscal sustainability in the
context of an ageing and shrinking population
• Policies to increase productivity and encourage inclusive growth
2
Key messages on the economic outlook
• Global growth will be around 4%Investment and trade have rebounded
• Monetary and fiscal policies have been supportiveThree quarters of OECD countries are undertaking fiscal easing
• Job growth has been strongThe OECD unemployment rate will be at its lowest since 1980
• Risks loom large over the next few years: oil prices, trade tensions, financial volatilityRising interest rates will pose challenges for highly indebted countries, households and corporations.
• Now is the time to reform for sustainable and inclusive growthInvest in education, skills, digital infrastructure
3
Investment has rebounded
Contribution to investment growthOECD economies
Note: Gross fixed capital formation, in volume. Data are year-on-year growth rates. Projections for 2018 and 2019.Source: OECD Economic Outlook database; and OECD calculations. 4
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Business and public Residential OECD% pts % pts
Trade has recovered
Growth in global trade
Note: World trade is measured as goods and services trade volumes measured at market exchange rates in US dollars. Global Port Traffic is measured monthly through the RWI/ISL-Container-Throughput-Index, seasonally and working day adjusted. Projections for 2018 and 2019.Source: OECD Economic Outlook database; and RWI/ISL.
5
100
107
114
121
128
135
142
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Index 2010 = 100% y-o-yGlobal trade growth (lhs) Global Port Traffic (rhs)
Note: The fiscal stance is calculated based on changes in the underlying primary balance as a percentage of potential GDP. Large fiscal easing is for a deterioration of the balance by more than 0.5% of potential GDP and small easing is for a deterioration by less than 0.5% of potential GDP. Large and small fiscal tightening are defined analogously. Chile, Mexico and Turkey are excluded due to the lack of data. Projections for 2018 and 2019. Source: OECD Economic Outlook database; and OECD calculations.
Change in fiscal stance in OECD countries
Fiscal policy is easing
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Large easing Small easing Small tightening Large tighteningNumber of countries Number of countries
6
Global stock market capitalisation
Source: World Federation of Exchanges; and OECD calculations.
Equity prices remain high despite a recent correction
40
50
60
70
80
90
40
50
60
70
80
90
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
USD trillion USD trillion
7
Exports to other Asian countries have been strong despite a recent slowdown
8Source: Bank of Japan
Exports by region in volume terms
Capital investment by the business sector is gradually expanding in the context of high profits and rising capacity
shortages
9
Note: For capacity (firms reporting an excess minus those reporting a shortage), the value is reversed on the right axis. Facilities capacity and capital investment plans are for all industries excluding finance and insurance.
Source: Bank of Japan; Ministry of Finance.
Capital investment, profits and excess capacity Tankan survey of firms’ capital investment plans
The labour market continues to be tight
10Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications; Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare.
While nominal wages are gradually rising, real wages have declined recently
11
Note: Three-month moving average of seasonally adjusted index for establishments with more than 30 employees. Real wages are calculated using the consumer price index excluding rent.(出典)厚生労働省
One factor limiting wage increases in the rapid rise in non-regular employment
12Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.
Inflation remains well below the 2% target
13
Note: Excludes the effect of consumption tax rate increases in FY 2014 and FY 2019. Compared to the same period of the previous year. The core price index is the OECD definition, excluding food and energy prices. Shaded part is a projection.
Source: OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections (database); Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications
1. Contribution to real GDP change rate.. 2. It is calculated from the total of the seasonally adjusted quarterly value of each year. 3. Consumer price index excluding food and energy prices. Source: OECD Economic Outlook, May 2018.
14
OECD projections for the Japanese economy
Global demand-supply balance and oil prices
Oil prices have risen significantly
Note: The global demand-supply balance measures the difference between global supply and global demand, both indexed to 100 in 2012Q3, 4 quarter moving average. Oil price refers to crude oil Brent price. The last point for oil prices is the last available daily value, as of 28 May 2018.Source: International Energy Agency; Thomson Reuters; and OECD calculations. 15
0
20
40
60
80
100
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
2015 2016 2017 2018
Global demand minus supply (lhs) Oil price (rhs)USD per barrelIndex
Demand < supplyDownward pressure on prices
Demand > supplyUpward pressure on prices
A negative shock to trade would be more harmful than in the past
Global exports and imports
Note: Trade is the average of exports and imports in a given year. Both trade and GDP are measured in volumes in US dollars at market exchange rates.Source: OECD Economic Outlook database; and OECD calculations. 16
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017
Advanced economies Emerging market economies% of global GDP % of global GDP
Reduce trade barriers to boost productivity and incomes
Note: Scenario in which tariffs are reduced by all G20 economies to the lowest level applied across them for each sector.Source: OECD METRO model simulations.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
World United States European Union China
%%Imports Exports
Increase in trade from multilateral tariff reductions Estimated medium-term impact of lowering tariffs in all G20 economies
17
• Japan’s economic outlook• Long-term challenges facing Japan• Achieving fiscal sustainability in the
context of an ageing and shrinking population
• Policies to increase productivity and encourage inclusive growth
18
Japan's well-being record is mixed
19Source: OECD (2017a), How’s Life? 2017: Measuring Well-being, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/how_life-2017-en.
Japan's per capita output growth has picked up
20
Source: OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections (database).
Per capita output growth (%), Japan and OECD average
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1990-2012 2012-2017
Japan OECD
Per capita output and labour productivity remain well below the top half of OECD countries
21
Note: Compared to the weighted average using population weights of the 17 OECD countries with highest GDP per capita in 2016, based on 2016 purchasing power parities (PPPs). The sum of the percentage difference in labour resource utilisation and labour productivity do not add up exactly to the GDP per capita difference, since the decomposition is multiplicative.Source: OECD (2018), OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections (database).
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Per capita income Labour productivity Labour inputs
Per capita income, labour productivity and labour inputs relative to top half of OECD (=100)
Productivity of small firms is low relative to large firms in Japan
22
Source: OECD (2016b), Entrepreneurship at a Glance, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/entrepreneur_aag-2016-en.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
IRL
HUN
TUR
ISR
MEX
JPN
GRC
CHE
CZE
USA
DNK
PRT
GBR
BEL
DEU
OECD PO
L
NLD
SVK
SWE
ESP
AUT
LVA
AUS
NOR ITA
SVN
FRA
FIN
EST
Value added per person employed in 2013 in firms with 10-49 workers relative to that in firms with more than 250 workers (firms with more than 250 workers = 100)
Small firms in Japan are old, suggesting a lack of economic dynamism
23
Source: Criscuolo et al. (2014).
Japan's population will remain the oldest in the OECD through 2050
24
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
MEX
TUR
CHL
KOR
ISR
SVK
IRL
LUX ISL
NZL
AUS
USA
POL
CAN
NOR
OECD CH
EHU
NCZ
ESV
NAU
TNL
DGB
RBE
LES
PES
TDN
KFR
ALV
ASW
EPR
TFI
NDE
UGR
C ITA
JPN
2015 2050
Population aged 65 and over as a percentage of the population aged 15-64
Source: OECD Demography and Population (database).
Japan faces a shrinking and ageing population
25
Source: OECD Demography and Population Statistics (database).
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 20500
20
40
60
80
100
120
140 Millions
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140Millions
Over 65 years
15-64 years (working-age population)
0-14 years
The wage gap between regular and non-regular workers is large
26
1. In June 2015, excluding overtime payments and bonuses.Source: Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare "Basic Survey on Wage Structure 2015".
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140 Per cent
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140Per cent
20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69Age group
RegularNon-regular
Wage as a percentage of the average wage of regular employees1
• Japan’s economic outlook• Long-term challenges facing Japan• Achieving fiscal sustainability in the
context of an ageing and shrinking population
• Policies to increase productivity and encourage inclusive growth
27
Japan’s fiscal situation has deteriorated considerably over the past 25 years
28
Note: OECD projections for 2016-17 for Japan and 2017 only for Greece.Source: OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections (database).
0
50
100
150
200
250
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Japan United StatesGreece OECD
Gross government debt as a percentage of GDP
Government projections show that the FY 2020 target for a primary surplus is out of reach
29
Note: January 2018 projections.Source: Cabinet Office of Japan (2018), Economic and Fiscal Projections for Medium to Long Term Analysis, Provisional Translation, Cabinet Office, Tokyo, http://www5.cao.go.jp/keizai3/econome/h30eiyaku1.pdf.
-4.0
-3.5
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Baseline (2% annual growth rate) High growth (more than 3% annual growth rate)
Primary balance (central and local governments) as a percentage of GDP on a fiscal year basis
Japan’s tax revenue tends to rely relatively more on direct taxes
30
Note: In the OECD approach, revenue sources include social security contributions. Source: OECD Revenue Statistics Database.
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
Taxes on property Taxes on corporate income Taxes on personal income Consumption taxes (includingVAT)
Social security contributionsand payroll taxes
Japan OECD
Structure of total tax revenues in Japan and the OECD in 2015
Japan has the third-lowest standard VAT rate in the OECD
31
Source: OECD Tax (database).
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
CAN
CHE
JPN
AUS
KOR
NZL
MEX
ISR
LUX
TUR
CHL
DEU
AUT
EST
FRA
SVK
GBR
BEL
CZE
LVA
NLD
ESP
ITA
SVN IRL
POL
PRT
FIN
GRC ISL
DNK
NOR
SWE
HUN
2018 2008
Standard VAT rates in the OECD in % in 2008 and 2018
Health and long-term care expenditures have risen rapidly in the last decade
32
Health and long-term care expenditures in Japan, % of GDP
Source: OECD Health Statistics 2017.
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Health spending (excluding LTC)Inpatient LTCDay LTCHome-based LTCLTC Social
Japan’s healthcare expenditure as a share of GDP is among the highest in the OECD
Healthcare expenditure as a share of GDP, 2016 (or nearest year)
33
Note: Healthcare expenditure includes health-related LTC spending and excludes investments. Australian expenditure estimates exclude all expenditure for residential aged-care facilities in welfare (social) services. Source: OECD Health Statistics 2017 for OECD countries, World Health Organization Global Health Expenditure Database for non-OECD countries.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
USA
CHE
DEU
SWE
FRA
JPN
CAN
NLD
NOR
BEL
DNK
AUT
GBR
AUS
FIN
NZL
CRI
OECD ES
PPR
TIT
AZA
FIS
LSV
NCH
LGR
C IRL
KOR
HUN
ISR
CZE
COL
SVK
EST
LTU
POL
LUX
BRA
MEX
LVA
RUS
CHN
IND
TUR
IDN
Government/Compulsory Voluntary/Out-of-pocket
34
1. In days.2. Per 1 000 population.3. In hospitals.Source: OECD (2017f), OECD Health Statistics (database).
In 2014 or latest year available
Number of doctor
consultations per capita per
year
Share of private
expenditure on
outpatient care (%)
Average total
hospital stay1
Average hospital stay for
acute care1
Total number of hospital
beds2
Number of acute-
care beds2,3
Number of long-
term care beds2,3
Number of beds in
long-term care
facilities2
Japan 12.8 17.1 29.9 16.9 13.2 7.9 2.7 6.2
OECD average 6.8 33.3 8.3 6.4 4.7 3.6 0.6 7.3
Highest country 14.9 54.9 29.9 16.9 13.2 7.9 4.2 12.8
Lowest country 2.6 13.3 4.0 3.5 1.6 1.6 0.0 0.5
International comparisons show room for healthcare cost savings in Japan
Elderly-related social spending is projected to rise further
35
Note: Fiscal System Council estimates based on the current framework, following the method of the European Commission (2012)Ageing-related spending is defined as programmes where per capita expenditure differs by age, such as pensions.1. Public pension spending is based on the actuarial valuation by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2014), Case C.2. Medical assistance in the Basic Livelihood Protection Program is included in “medical insurance”.3. The population over age 65 as a share of the total population.Source: Fiscal System Council (2015).
2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 20600
10
20
30
40
50 Per cent of GDP
0
10
20
30
40
50Per cent of population
Medical insurance² (left scale)Long-term care insurance (left scale)Public pension¹ (left scale) Share of the elderly³ (right scale)
1. Commit to a more detailed medium-term fiscal consolidation path with specific spending cuts and tax increases to strengthen confidence in Japan's fiscal sustainability
2. Gradually raise the consumption tax rate.
3. Enhance equity by introducing an earned income tax credit.
4. Fully apply macroeconomic indexation as soon as possible.
5. Raise the pension eligibility age above 65.
6. Take long-term care out of hospitals and reduce long-term care insurance coverage for those with less severe needs and increase the use of generic drugs.
36
Key recommendations to ensure fiscal sustainability
• Japan’s economic outlook• Long-term challenges facing Japan• Achieving fiscal sustainability in the
context of an ageing and shrinking population
• Policies to increase productivity and encourage inclusive growth
37
Women are under-represented in management positions
38
Women’s share of management employment and female share of labour force, all ages, 2015 or latest available year (%)
Note: For Canada, Chile and the United States, the women’s share of managerial employment is for jobs classified in International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO) 88 category 1 (as legislators, senior officials and managers). For all other countries, the women’s share of managerial employment is for jobs classified in ISCO 08 category 1 (as managers). All data are for 2015, except for the United States (2013) and Australia and Canada (both 2014).Source: Based on OECD (2017g) The Pursuit of Gender Equality: An Uphill Battle, OECD Publishing, Paris, Figure 11.3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264281318-en.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LVA
USA
HUN
POL
SWE ISL
SVN
AUS
NOR
CAN
GBR
CHE
MEX
IRL
FIN
PRT
BEL
ISR
FRA
ESP
SVK OE
…ES
TAU
TCZ
EDE
UDN
KIT
ANL
DGR
CCH
LLU
XTU
RJP
NKO
R
Women's share of managerial employment (↘) Women's share of the labour force
Japan is one of the most robot-intensive economies in the world
Industrial robot stock over manufacturing value added, millions USD, 2005 and 2015
39
Note: OECD calculations based on International Federation of Robotics data and the World Bank, Word Development Indicators Database, September 2017.Source: OECD (2017c), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2017: The digital transformation, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888933617377.
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
KOR
JPN
DEU
CZE
SVN
SVK
ITA
HUN
OECD ES
P
EU28
SWE
USA
2015 2005
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
CHN
ZAF
BRA
IND
RUS
International collaboration in science and innovation is relatively low
40
Co-authorship and co-invention as a percentage of scientific publications and IP5 patent families, 2005-16
Note: The median is calculated across OECD countries plus non-members (Brazil, China, Indonesia, India, Russian Federation and South Africa).Source: OECD calculations based on Scopus Custom Data, Elsevier, Version 4, 2017 and OECD, STI Micro-data Lab: Intellectual Property Database, http://oe.cd/ipstats, July 2017. See OECD (2017c), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2017: The Digital Transformation, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264268821-en.
AUS
AUT
BEL
CAN
CHL
CZE
DNK
EST
FINFRADEU
GRC
HUN
ISL
IRL
ISR
ITA
JPNKOR
LVA
LUX
MEX
NLDNZL
NOR
POLPRT
SVK
SVN
ESP SWE
CHE
TUR
GBR
USA
BRA
CHN
IDN
INDRUS
ZAF
0
10
20
30
40
50
0.0 25.0 50.0 75.0
OECD countries BRIICS
Inter
natio
nal c
o-inv
entio
ns (
%)
International co-authorship (%)Me
dian v
alue
Median value
41
Venture capital investments are low in Japan compared to other OECD countries
Note: For Israel and Japan, data are for 2014.Source: OECD (2018b), Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2018: An OECD Scoreboard, OECD Publishing, Paris http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/fin_sme_ent-2018-en.
Venture capital investments as a percentage of GDP, 2016
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
KOR IRL
FIN
ZAF
SWE
CHE
FRA
ESP
NZL
LVA
EST
DNK
GBR
BEL
NOR
HUN
NLD
JPN
AUT
AUS
SVK
PRT
SVN ITA
POL
RUS
CZE
LUX
GRC
Seed/start-up/early stage Later stage venture Total
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
ISR
USA
CAN
The share of entrepreneurs in Japan is low, especially among women
Source: OECD (2016), Entrepreneurship at a Glance.
42
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 Per cent
NO
RJ
PN
ISR
US
AT
UR
ES
TG
BR
ISL
LU
XA
US
DN
KS
WE
CZ
ES
VK
FIN
SV
NF
RA
NL
DM
EX
IRL
OE
CD
LV
AB
EL
AU
TD
EU
ZA
FC
AN
BR
AP
OL
NZ
LH
UN
PR
TC
HE
KO
RE
SP
CH
LIT
AG
RC
A. Women
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9Per cent
AU
SN
OR
JP
NL
UX
GB
RU
SA
SV
KS
VN
CZ
EB
RA
DN
KN
ZL
PO
LS
WE
ME
XE
ST
LV
AB
EL
NL
DO
EC
DIS
LT
UR
DE
UF
RA
FIN
ES
PIR
LC
AN
AU
TH
UN
PR
TC
HL
ISR
CH
EG
RC
KO
RZ
AF
ITA
B. Men
Promote second chances for failed entrepreneurs by making the personal bankruptcy system less stringent.
Views on entrepreneurship in Japan are negative
1. Share of adults who perceive good opportunities to start a business.2. Share of adults who are not involved in entrepreneurial activity and expect to start a business within three years.Source: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2015).
43
0
10
20
30
40
50
60 Per cent
0
10
20
30
40
50
60Per cent
Perceived opportunities¹ Perceived capabilities Fear of failure Entrepreneurial intention²
JapanOECD average
Barriers to trade and investment are high in Japan
44
Barriers to trade and investment indicator, 2013
Note: The OECD Indicators of Product Market Regulation (PMR) are a comprehensive and internationally-comparable set of indicators that measure the degree to which policies promote or inhibit competition. Empirical research shows that the indicators have a robust link to performance. The indicator, which ranges from 0 (most relaxed) to 3 (most stringent), is available for 35 OECD countries. The overall indicator is based on more than 700 questions.Source: OECD PMR Database.
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
NLD
BEL
AUS
FIN
GBR
LUX
HUN
POL
IRL
CHE
FRA
PRT
DEU
ESP
CZE
ITA
CHL
DNK ISL
GRC
USA
NZL
OECD SV
KNO
RAU
TSW
EES
TJP
NLV
ASV
NCA
NIS
RTU
RKO
RME
X
Japan has room to further reduce barriers to trade in services
OECD Services Trade Restrictive Index 2017, from 0 (least restrictive) to 1 (most restrictive)
45Source: OECD Services Trade Restrictiveness Index, http://www.oecd.org/tad/services-trade/services-trade-restrictiveness-index.htm.
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Comp
uter s
ervic
es
Telec
ommu
nicati
on
Broa
dcas
ting
Motio
n pict
ures
Soun
d rec
ordin
g
Air t
rans
port
Mariti
me tr
ansp
ort
Road
freig
ht tra
nspo
rt
Rail f
reigh
t tran
spor
t
Cour
ier se
rvice
s
Distr
ibutio
n ser
vices
Carg
o-ha
ndlin
g
Stor
age a
nd w
areh
ouse
Freig
ht for
ward
ing
Custo
ms br
oker
age
Lega
l ser
vices
Acco
untin
g ser
vices
Comm
ercia
l ban
king
Insur
ance
Cons
tructi
on
Arch
itectu
re se
rvice
s
Engin
eerin
g ser
vices
Digital network Transport and distribution supply chain Market bridging and supportingservices
Physical infrastructureservices
Restrictions on foreign entry Restrictions to movement of peopleOther discriminatory measures Barriers to competitionRegulatory transparency Best practice
Japan has a low level of FDI stocks
46
Inward and outward stocks of direct investment as a percentage of GDP, 2016
Note: Inward/outward FDI not represented: Belgium (102/122), Ireland (276/276), Luxembourg (351/353), the Netherlands (107/180) and Switzerland (130/165).Source: OECD (2018), FDI stocks (indicator), http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/80eca1f9-en.
AUSAUT
CAN
CHL
CZE
DNK
EST
FIN
FRADEU
GRC
HUN
ISL
ISR
ITA
JPN
KOR
LVAMEX
NZL NORPOL
PRTSVK
SVN
ESP
SWE
TUR
GBR
USA OECD
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
Inwar
d in p
erce
ntage
of G
DP
Outward in percentage of GDP
Foreign-owned enterprises in Japan have low export intensity
Export intensity of foreign-owned enterprises
47
Source: OECD (2017j), Japan: Trade and Investment Statistical Note, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/investment/JAPAN-trade-investment-statistical-country-note.pdf.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Japan OECD medianExport Intensity
Government credit guarantees to SMEs are high
48
Stock of guarantees as a share of GDP in 2015
Source: Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2017: An OECD Scorecard .
.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Per cent of GDP
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Per cent of GDP
GBR MEX DNK CAN AUT TUR SVK NLD BEL CZEOECDUSA RUS ISR EST FIN FRA ITA ESP HUN KOR JPN GRC
49
Carbon intensity of Japan’s energy mix jumped after 2011 and remains high
Note: The IEA Energy Sector Carbon Intensity Index tracks how many tonnes of carbon dioxide are emitted for each unit of energy supplied (total primary energy supply).Source: IEA (2018), "Indicators for CO2 emissions", IEA CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion Statistics (database), http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/data-00433-en.
Energy sector carbon intensity, 1990=100
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
12019
90
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Japan OECD
Key recommendations to boost productivity for inclusive growth
1. Remove obstacles to female employment by increasing the capacity of childcare and improving work-life balance through a binding ceiling on overtime work.
2. Increase the productivity of SMEs by strengthening R&D links between firms and universities.
3. Facilitate the exit of non-viable firms by reducing the use of personal guarantees.
4. Promote second chances for failed entrepreneurs by making the personal bankruptcy system less stringent.
5. Implement the planned reform of the Credit Guarantee System to strengthen market forces and keep public guarantees of SME loans on a downward trend.
6. Break down dualism by relaxing employment protection for regular workers and expanding social insurance coverage and training for non-regular workers. 50
More information…
www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/economic-survey-japan.htm
OECDOECD Economics
Disclaimers: The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law.This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
51