james t. peterson oregon cooperative fish and wildlife research unit · 2011-09-13 · oregon...

16
James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit

Upload: others

Post on 17-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

James T. PetersonOregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife

Research Unit

Page 2: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

Background

IL – MO – ID – GA - OR

Assistant Unit Leader of GA Coop Unit 11 y

Assistant Unit Leader of OR Coop Unit, since 2/11

Research focusStream ecologyStructured Decision Making /Adaptive managementSample design and estimationEcological modeling

Instruction/traininggraduate coursesworkshops

Page 3: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

Ongoing research projects

Development of Adaptive Management Framework for the Conservation and Recovery of Imperiled Mussels

The Development and Assessment of Tools for Evaluating Stream Fish Community Responses to Anthropogenic Changes along Thermal Gradients

Development and evaluation of monitoring protocols for the rare and elusive Robust Redhorse

Using decision models to assist vital signs monitoring in national parks, a prototype using sea otters (Enhydra lutris) in Coastal Alaska

Page 4: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

Development of Adaptive Management Framework for the Conservation and Recovery of Imperiled Mussels

Identify stakeholder and manager objectives

Estimate mussel demographic rates (age, growth, survival)

Develop culture techniques for at risk mussel species

Build decision support models

Develop monitoring protocol

Page 5: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

Changes in flowsPre-irrigation (<1974) vs post-irrigation

Extensive agricultural irrigation1975 - present

Context: Streamflows in the Coastal Plain SE

Page 6: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

The Process: Stakeholders Meetings

Identified conservation objectives

Identified potential management actions

Developed conceptual models

link management actions to objectives

Page 7: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

0.60.6

0.70.7

0.80.8

0.90.9

1.01.0

1.11.1

1.21.2

1.31.3

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

Popu

latio

n gr

owth

rat

ePo

pula

tion

grow

th r

ate

Median summer discharge (m3/s)

The Science: Evaluating the factors affecting mussel populations

Population decreasing

Population increasing

Page 8: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

Mussel propagation

Coordinated with FWS Warm Springs (GA) Hatchery

Developed mussel propagation techniques

4 listed species, 1 yetDetermined hostsEfficiency and cost effectiveness

Evaluating survival introduced mussels

Page 9: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

Modeling the decision

Management decisionsImprove instream habitatRestore riparianExclude cattleRestore fish passageImprove road crossingPropogationPurchase easementPurchase crops/irrigation

Net socioeconomic benefit

Cost of management action

Population size

Water quality

Flow regime

Climate

Mussel demographics

Stream channel characteristics Host fish

population

exotic species

Riparian condition

Upstream land use

Page 10: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

Monitoring protocol development

Formally linked to decision makingReduce uncertaintyImprove understanding/future decisions

Need demographic informationAbundance, survival, recruitment

Limited monitoring resources

Developed hybrid designMinimize effortMaximize insight

Page 11: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

The Development and Assessment of Tools for Evaluating Stream Fish Community Responses to Anthropogenic Changes along Thermal Gradients

• Engaged managers to identify management priorities.

• Develop models to assess changes:climatewater use/ impoundmentland use

• Evaluate effectiveness of management actions

Page 12: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

Example modelingFish species richness change in response to drought

< 10>10 - 15>15 - 20>20 - 25>25

Number of fish species

Page 13: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

User friendly software for managers

Page 14: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

Recently initiated research projects

The Development of an Adaptive, Decision-Support Tool for the Conservation and Recovery of Least Chub, Iotichthys Phlegethontis

Collaboration with BLM, FWS, UDWREvaluate potential success actions: reintroduction, restoration, exoticsIntegrate with monitoring

Adaptive decision-support models for Coastal salmon management Elk River north, excluding ColumbiaCollaboration with ODFWDevelop adaptive management framework non-listed stocksIntegrate with monitoring protocols

Using decision models to manage brown bears in National Parks landsCollaboration with NPS & ADFGHarvest management and conservation

Page 15: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

Future research?

Decision modeling spring Chinook pre-spawn mortality

Monitoring fish community attributes in Blitzen River

Bull trout reintroduction efforts

Integrating redband trout management, modeling, and monitoring

Others

Page 16: James T. Peterson Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit · 2011-09-13 · Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Background IL –MO –ID –GA -OR

Instruction and trainingGraduate coursesStructured Decision Making in Natural Resource Management

E-courseLecture and computer lab

Quantitative decision analysisadvanced ecological modelingfocus on natural resource management decision-making

Professional trainingODFW Workshop on Occupancy Estimation and Modeling

An Introduction to Structured Decision Making for Natural Resources Management

AFS Continuing Education Course Brief Introduction to Capture-Recapture Methods

ODFW Biologist meeting