iucn criteria
TRANSCRIPT
IUCN Criteria
of
Endangerment
Praveen Kumar SinghM.Sc. Environmental Science
Central University of Rajasthan
IUCN at a glance
Founded in 1948 as the world’s first globalenvironmental organisation
Today the largest professional globalconservation network
A leading authority on the environment andsustainable development
More than 1,200 member organizationsincluding 200+ government and 900+ non-government organizations
Almost 11,000 voluntary scientists and experts,grouped in six Commissions in some 160countries
IUCN’s work is supported by over 1,000 staff in45 offices and hundreds of partners in public,NGO and private sectors around the world. TheUnion’s headquarters are located in Gland,near Geneva, in Switzerland.
A neutral forum for governments, NGOs,scientists, business and local communities tofind practical solutions to conservation anddevelopment challenges
Continued……
Thousands of field projects and activities around the world
Governance by a Council elected by member organizations every four years at the
IUCN World Conservation Congress
Funded by governments, bilateral and multilateral agencies, foundations, member
organisations and corporations
Official Observer Status at the United Nations General Assembly
What does IUCN do?
Conserving biodiversity is central to
the mission of IUCN. It demonstrate
how biodiversity is fundamental to
addressing some of the world’s
greatest challenges such as climate
change, sustainable development and
food security.
To deliver conservation and
sustainability at both the global and
local level, IUCN builds on its
strengths in the following areas:
Science – 11,000 experts setting
global standards in their fields, for
example, the definitive international
standard for species extinction risk –
the IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species™.
Action – hundreds of conservation
projects all over the world from the
local level to those involving several
countries, all aimed at the sustainable
management of biodiversity and
natural resources.
Influence – through the collective
strength of more than 1,200
government and non-governmental
Member organizations, IUCN
influences international
environmental conventions, policies
and laws.
Continued……
How does IUCN work?
All of the work is framed by a Global
Programme, developed with and
approved by IUCN member
organisations every four years.
Current programme runs from 2012
to 2016.
IUCN's Global Programme is
coordinated by IUCN’s Secretariat
and delivered in conjunction with
IUCN member organisations,
Commissions and IUCN's theme-
based programmes:
Business
Economics
Ecosystem management
Environmental law
Forest conservation
Gender
Global policy
Marine and polar
Protected areas
Science and knowledge
Social policy
Species
Water
World Heritage
Continued……
The
IUCN
Categories
Not Evaluated (NE)
Near Threatened (NT)
Data Deficient (DD)
Endangered (EN)
Critically Endangered (CR)
Vulnerable (VU)
Extinct in the Wild (EW)
Extinct (EX)
Least Concern (LC)
(Evaluated)
(Adequate data)
Data Deficient (DD)
A taxon is Data Deficient when there is inadequate information to make a direct, or
indirect, assessment of its risk of extinction based on its distribution and/or
population status.
Tree Tomato
Solanum [Cyphomandra] betacea
Not Evaluated (NE)
A taxon is Not Evaluated when it has not yet been evaluated
against the criteria.
Although DD and NE are not
threatened categories, taxa classed as
DD or NE should NOT be treated as
not threatened.
Data Deficient (DD) tags
Taxa listed as DD may be given the following tags
Unknown provenance: The taxon is known only from one or more
specimens with no or extremely uncertain locality information, so that it is
not possible to make any further inference about its status.
Uncertain taxonomic status: The taxon’s validity at the species level has
been questioned or is unconfirmed, e.g., it may represent a subspecies,
hybrid, ecophenotype or aberrant individual.
Insufficient information: There is inadequate information on the
population size/structure, trend or range to apply the Red List Criteria.
Near Threatened (NT)
A taxon is Near Threatened when it has been evaluated against the criteria and
does not qualify for CR, EN or VU now, but is close to qualifying for or is likely to
qualify for a threatened category in the near future.
Least Concern (LC)
A taxon is Least Concern when it has been evaluated against the criteria and does
not qualify for CR, EN,VU or NT. Widespread and abundant
taxa are included in this category.
Chinkara in Desert National Park
Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra)
A taxon is threatened when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of
the criteria for the thresholds stated in one of the three threatened categories:
Vulnerable, Endangered or Critically Endangered.
Critically Endangered (CR)
CR taxa are considered to be facing an extremely high risk of
extinction in the wild.
Endangered (EN)
EN taxa are considered to be facing a very high
risk of extinction in the wild. Tiger
Vulnerable (VU)
VU taxa are considered to be facing a high risk of extinction
in the wild.
Great Indian bustard
Sarus crane
A taxon is Extinct when there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has
died.
Javan tiger
Extinct (EX)
Extinct in the Wild (EW)
A taxon is Extinct in the Wild when it is known only to survive in cultivation, in
captivity or as a naturalized population (or populations) well
outside the past range.
A species is presumed EX or EW only when exhaustive
surveys have been carried out:
• throughout its historic range;
• in known and/or expected habitat;
• at appropriate times (diurnal, seasonal, annual); and
• over a time frame appropriate to the species' life cycle
and have failed to record an individual.
Extinct (EX) Extinct in the Wild (EW)
PE species are those that are, on the balance of evidence, likely to be extinct, but for
which there is a small chance that they may be extant and thus should not be listed
as Extinct until adequate surveys have failed to find the species and local or
unconfirmed reports have been discounted.
CR (PE)
Possibly Extinct Tag
Evidence for extinction:
For species with recent last records, the declines have been well documented.
Severe threatening processes are known to have occurred (e.g. extensive habitat
loss, spread of alien invasive, intensive hunting).
The species possesses attributes known to predispose taxa to extinction e.g.
natural rarity and/or tiny range, etc.
Recent surveys have been apparently adequate given the species’ ease of
detection, but have failed to detect the species.
Evidence against extinction:
Recent field work has been inadequate (any surveys have been insufficiently
intensive/extensive, or inappropriately timed; or the species’ range is
inaccessible, remote, unsafe or inadequately known).
The species is difficult to detect (it is cryptic, inconspicuous, nocturnal,
nomadic, silent or its vocalisations are unknown, identification is difficult, or the
species occurs at low densities).
There have been reasonably convincing recent local reports or unconfirmed
sightings.
Suitable habitat (free of introduced predators and pathogens if relevant)
remains within the species’ known range, and/or allospecies or congeners may
survive despite similar threatening processes.
Possibly Extinct species
Nature of the criteria
There are five quantitative criteria which are used to determine whether a taxon is
threatened or not, and if threatened, which category of threat it belongs in
(Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable).
The five criteria are:
A. Declining population (past, present and/or projected)
B. Geographic range size, and fragmentation, decline or fluctuations
C. Small population size and fragmentation, decline, or fluctuations
D. Very small population or very restricted distribution
E. Quantitative analysis of extinction risk (e.g., Population Viability Analysis)