Iron chelation beyond transfusion iron overload
Post on 06-Jun-2016
Embed Size (px)
Iron chelation beyond transfusion iron overload
Antonello PietrangeloCenter for Hemochromatosis, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
The effects of systemic iron overload in hereditary (e.g., classic HFE hemochromatosis) or acquired disor-ders (e.g., transfusion-dependent iron overload) are well known. Several other iron overload diseases, withan observed mild-to-moderate increase in iron in selected organs (e.g., the liver or the brain), or with mis-distribution of iron within cells (e.g., reticuloendothelial cells) or subcellular organelles (e.g., mitochon-dria), have been recognized more recently. The deleterious impact of any excess iron may be high as activeredox iron may directly contribute to cell damage or affect signaling pathways involved in cell necrosisapoptosis or organ brosis and cancer. This article discusses the potential use of iron chelation therapyto treat iron overload from causes other than transfusion overload. Am. J. Hematol. 82:11421146,2007. VVC 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
IntroductionIron overload is involved in the pathogenesis of many
human diseases. Iron accumulation essentially results fromeither increased cell iron inux or decreased efux, or, aswe are just now beginning to recognize, altered subcellulariron trafc (Fig. 1) . When considering iron distribution,specic pathologic states in humans result from systemiciron overload (e.g., hemochromatosis, posttransfusion sid-erosis, etc.). Other disorders are associated instead withregional accumulation of iron in subcellular compartments(e.g., mitochondria in Friedreichs ataxia) or with certain celltypes (e.g., macrophages in anemia of chronic disease andclassic ferroportin disease) or organs (the liver in viral hep-atitis or the brain in some neurodegenerative disorders) .In strict terms, the latter disorders may not all qualify astrue iron overload states, as total body iron content maynot be increased. Nevertheless, the impact on cell damageand organ disease may be extremely high even in the pres-ence of mild iron overload, as any excess iron may fuel oxi-dative stress and affect signaling pathways important forthe pathogenesis of that specic condition.This knowledge has led us to reconsider the traditional
approach to iron removal strategies, and has broadened theindication for the use of phlebotomy and, particularly, ironchelation. This article provides examples of diseases whereiron chelation therapy may prove useful in the near future.
Systemic Iron Overload: HemochromatosisAmong all iron loading disorders, hereditary hemochro-
matosis and transfusion-dependent iron overload in heredi-tary anemias, particularly thalassemia, are central whenconsidering epidemiological impact, extent of iron burden,and risk for iron-related morbidity and mortality. The thera-peutic approach to these diseases has been based on adichotomy: phlebotomy is indicated for hemochromatosispatients, and iron chelation is the gold standard for treatingtransfusion iron overload in hereditary anemias. However,in practice, there are clear limitations to this rigid scheme.For example, while the therapeutic management for hemo-chromatosis involves phlebotomy (venesection), specicchelators are emerging based on the improved pathophys-iological understanding of iron overload diseases. Phlebot-omy in hemochromatosis has some limitations: patientsmay be intolerant, or have a low acceptance of it; it may bedifcult to gain peripheral vein access; and it is contraindi-cated in patients with severe heart disease or anemia.
However, the literature on the use of chelators in classichemochromatosis is limited to case reports, mainly basedon the use of deferoxamine . A recent study by Fabioet al. demonstrated that combined chelation therapy withdeferoxamine and deferiprone successfully reversed theeffects of heart failure in the setting of unrecognized juve-nile hemochromatosis . Therefore, iron chelation mayprove useful in hemochromatosis cases where phlebotomyis not indicated or feasible.
Regional Iron Accumulation: Viral HepatitisAnd Fatty Liver DiseaseBeyond primary iron overload states associated with
massive iron excess, an increasing number of other ironoverload conditions have been recognized in which anobserved mild or moderate increase of iron stores appearsto have signicant clinical relevance. This is the case ofchronic hepatitis C, insulin resistance-associated hepaticiron overload syndrome, and end-stage liver disease (see below). In fact, investigations into the effects of lowiron-overload in various hepatic diseases have suggestedthat iron may play a role as a cofactor in lipid peroxidationand brogenesis [7,13,14].
Viral hepatitisThe course of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may be
associated with mild-to-moderate iron overload. Manypatients infected with HCV show increased serum ferritinand iron in the liver . Several factors have been sug-gested that may be important in increasing hepatic irondeposits during chronic HCV infection. Figure 2 depicts thepossible pathways of HFE and HCV synergism duringchronic hepatitis C infection .The HFE mutation may have a synergistic effect on iron
metabolism. Many HCV patients have an increased preva-lence of the C282Y mutation, the main mutation of HFEassociated with hemochromatosis [15,16]. HCV individuals
*Correspondence to: A. Pietrangelo, Professor for Medicine, Center forHemochromatosis, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico,Via del Pozzo 71, 41100 Modena, Italy.E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Received for publication 1 October 2007; Accepted 1 October 2007
Am. J. Hematol. 82:11421146, 2007.
Published online 29 October 2007 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).DOI: 10.1002/ajh.21101
VVC 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
American Journal of Hematology 1142 http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/35105
who are heterozygous for HFE appear to develop morebrosis, despite only mild increases in iron stores . Theformation of free-radicals during hepatocellular iron over-load associated with hemochromatosis may have a syner-gistic effect on the pathogenesis of the viral liver disease.Non-transferrin-bound iron (NTBI) increases in patients withhemochromatosis as a result of transferrin iron saturation.NTBI is a redox-active form of iron that appears in the cir-culation of both hemochromatosis homozygotes and het-erozygotes. It has been postulated that the liver may use amechanism other than the HFE-transferrin receptor 1(TfR1) system for the uptake of NTBI during iron overload[9,1821]. Hepatic iron storage relies predominantly on fer-ritin to sequester iron and make it catalytically inert; how-ever, redox changes in the cytoplasm, particularly inresponse to an ongoing infection, can rapidly release thisiron. The mobilized iron may become catalytically activeand generate reactive oxygen species that cause liver dam-age, and this may lead to hepatic brosis .A pathogenic effect of a mutant HFE in Kupffer cells may
also play a role in the disruption of iron metabolism as wellas in disease progression. Normally during an inammatorychallenge, macrophages respond by increasing iron stor-age, but in hemochromatosis, macrophages do not respondin this manner. HFE mutations could modify the immuno-logical activities of macrophages during host response tobacterial and viral infection by disrupting iron-mediated reg-ulation in Kupffer cells . Another explanation is that HFEin Kupffer cells synergizes with other iron proteins such asferroportin or the natural resistance-associated macro-phage protein . Figure 2 depicts the possible central roleplayed by Kupffer cells in HFE/HCV disease progression. A study of hepatic immunological markers by Cardosoet al. suggested that the expression of major histocompati-bility complex (MHC) class I molecules by Kupffer cells pla-ces them as probable players in the host response to HCVinfection .HFE might exert a still uncharacterized immunological
function. HFE is a nonclassical MHC class I molecule thatmay interact with cells of the immune system, although nodirect evidence of this has been found to date [9,23]. Onehypothesis suggests that HFE is the ligand for specic
T-lymphocytes in the intestine, coordinating both intestinalimmune response and iron uptake from the gut [9,24].Weiss et al. studied associations of macrophage activity,T-helper cell types 1 and 2 (Th-1/Th-2), iron availability, andclinical course in patients with HCV infection . Theauthors reported an association between macrophage acti-vation and hepatic dysfunction. They suggest that iron sta-tus may modulate Th-1/Th-2 responses in vivo, therebyaffecting the clinical course of HCV infection . Morerecently, the direct effect of iron on HCV translation and replication  has been suggested, but the actualimplications of these in vitro observations need to beunderstood.Interferon-ribavirin therapy is an effective regimen used
to treat HCV infection. The role of iron overload and theresponse to antiviral therapy in patients with chronic HCVinfection has been debated. A few studies suggest that theremoval of iron by phlebotomy may have a benecial effecton markers of cytolysis, oxidative stress, and brogenesis. Several studies have shown an associationbetween iron overload and lower response rates to inter-feron-alpha monotherapy, which contribute to chronic HCVdisease progression . However, there is still some specu-lation about whether iron overload has an effect on theresponse rate to interferon-ribavirin combination therapy. Infact, ribavirin-induced hemolysis may perturb iron statusand interfere with antiviral activity or preclude the use ofiron removal strategies. Rulyak et al. showed no differencein pretreatment hepatic iron concentration betw