irmp fire & rescue service comparison

28
IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison Fire Authority Meeting 10 th October 2007

Upload: coral

Post on 21-Jan-2016

53 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison. Fire Authority Meeting 10 th October 2007. IRMP Setting standards. Out of the Line of Fire - Home Office Report 1998. Old response standards (1958). IRMP Setting standards. Risk cat. No. pumps. Time 1. Time 2. Time 3. A. 3. 5. 5. 8. B. 2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

IRMPFire & Rescue Service Comparison

Fire Authority Meeting

10th October 2007

Page 2: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

IRMPSetting standards

• Out of the Line of Fire - Home Office Report 1998.• Old response standards (1958)

Risk cat. No. pumps Time 1 Time 2 Time 3

A 3 5 5 8

B 2 5 8 -

C 1 8 - 10 - -

D 1 20 - -

High Risk PDA

Page 3: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

IRMPSetting standards

• Out of the Line of Fire - Home Office Report 1998.• Old response standards (1958)

PDAHigh Risk

--201D

--8 - 101C

-852B

8553A

Time 3Time 2Time 1No. pumpsRisk cat.

These st

andards were to

be achieve

d on at least

seve

nty fiv

e percent o

f all c

alls

Page 4: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

• UK response standards now determined locally• Prevention - Protection - Response• Integrated Risk Management Plan• Based on eight years of data• People based not Property based

IRMPNational Framework

Page 5: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Response Standards - Comparison

Dwelling firesRTCs

Dwelling Pump 1 Dwelling Pump 2

RTC Resource 1

RBFRS 8 10 11

Manchester 7 9 8

Shropshire H 10 13 10

Shropshire M 15 18 12

Shropshire L 20 20 15

Buckinghamshire 10 0 0

Norfolk 10 15 13

Hampshire 8 0 0

Lancashire VH 6 9 13

Lancashire H 8 11 13

Lancashire M 10 13 13

Lancashire L 12 15 13

Source - Web search 13 Sept 2007

Zero = not set OR not known.

Page 6: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Response Standards

05

10152025

RBFRS

Manc

heste

r

Shrops

hire

H

Shrops

hire

M

Shrops

hire

L

Buckin

gham

shire

Norfo

lk

Hampsh

ire

Lanc

ashir

e VH

Lanc

ashir

e H

Lanc

ashir

e M

Lanc

ashir

e L

Fire & Rescue Service

Res

po

nse

Tim

e (m

inu

tes)

Dwelling Pump 1 Dwelling Pump 2 RTC Resource 1

IRMPResponse Standards Comparison

Page 7: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

RB

FR

S

Bu

cks

Ha

nts

No

rfo

lk

La

ncs

Sh

rop

shir

e

GM

C

Pop/pump (000s)0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

Population/pump and £/Person

Pop/pump (000s) £/person (05/06 est)

IRMPFire & Rescue Service Comparison

Page 8: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

IRMPFire & Rescue Service Comparison

Incidents/pump and £/incident

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

RBFRSBuc

ks

Hants

Norfo

lk

Lanc

s

Salop

GMC

Inc/pump

£/incident (05/06)

Page 9: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Risk Models

Methodology Lancashire

Shropshire

Hampshire

Royal Berkshire

IRMPRisk Model Comparison

Page 10: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Lancashire Risk Model

IRMPRisk Model

Casualty rate (x4)

Dwelling Fire rate

(x1)

Non-dwelling fires

(x1)

IMD Score (x2)

+ + + =

FINAL RISK SCORE

Page 11: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Lancashire Risk Model

IRMPRisk Model

Risk Rating Risk Grading

76 and above VERY HIGH

56 to 75 HIGH

35 to 55 MEDIUM

34 and below LOW

Page 12: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

IRMPRisk Model

Lancashire Risk Map

Page 13: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Shropshire

Risk Model

IRMPRisk Model

Page 14: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Shropshire Risk Model

IRMPRisk Model

Page 15: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Shropshire

Risk Map

IRMPRisk Model

Page 16: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Hampshire Risk Model

IRMPRisk Model

80% in E

ight Minutes

Page 17: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Hampshire

Risk Model

“80 in 8”

IRMPRisk Model

71.44% 80%

actual target

Page 18: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Berkshire

Risk Model

IRMPRisk Model

Dwelling firesRoad traffic collisionsDeliberate and secondary firesSleeping risksOther buildingsMajor incidents

Page 19: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Berkshire

Risk Model

IRMPRisk Model

Dwelling firesRoad traffic collisionsDeliberate and secondary firesSleeping risksOther buildingsMajor incidents

Key Risks of Death & Injury

Page 20: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Berkshire

Risk Model

IRMPRisk Model

Dwelling firesRoad traffic collisionsDeliberate and secondary firesSleeping risksOther buildingsMajor incidents

Preventio

n Prio

rity

Page 21: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Berkshire

Risk Model

IRMPRisk Model

Dwelling firesRoad traffic collisionsDeliberate and secondary firesSleeping risksOther buildingsMajor incidents

Prote

ction

Prio

rity

Page 22: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Berkshire

Risk Model

IRMPRisk Model

Dwelling firesRoad traffic collisionsDeliberate and secondary firesSleeping risksOther buildingsMajor incidents

ORIS / 7(2)d Visits

Page 23: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Berkshire

Risk Model

IRMPRisk Model

Dwelling firesRoad traffic collisionsDeliberate and secondary firesSleeping risksOther buildingsMajor incidents

ICU Refresh / ICS Review

Page 24: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

RESPONSE STANDARDS

DWELLING FIRESThe Royal Berkshire Fire and Rescue Service is

committed to achieving an optimum response standards of:

8 minutes for the first appliance and 10 minutes for the second appliance for dwelling fires.

10 minutes for the first appliance and 12 minutes for the second appliance for dwelling fires.

Higher risk localities: where it is predicted that appliances will not reach dwelling fires within the standard response will be prioritised for community safety initiatives to drive down the risk.

Page 25: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

RESPONSE STANDARDS

DWELLING FIRESThe Royal Berkshire Fire and Rescue Service is

committed to achieving an optimum response standard of:

8 minutes for the first appliance and 10 minutes for the second appliance for dwelling fires.

10 minutes for the first appliance and 12 minutes for the second appliance for dwelling fires.

Higher risk localities where it is predicted that appliances will not reach dwelling fires within the standard response will be prioritised for community safety initiatives to drive down the risk.

ASPIRATION

STANDARD

PREVENTION

Page 26: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

Berkshire

Risk Model

IRMPSetting standards

Attendance % 1st in 8 and 2nd in 10 minutes

Page 27: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

IRMP Comparison

Evolving Issue• ‘Integration’ is Key• It is a complex area• Geography and Demography Matter • There are no national requirements (as yet)• National Meeting next week

Page 28: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison

IRMP Comparison

THANK YOU

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS?