ipr, seeds and farmers’ rights emerging issues - ditdit pelegrina, searice
TRANSCRIPT
IPR (intellectual property rights) on seedsExclusive proprietary rights on seeds
Argued as driving force for innovation and pre-condition for investments Japan-Philippines; US-Philippines - with conditions on patent and plant variety protection
US-Singapore: patent protection for transgenic plants and animals
US-Morroco: patent protection for plants and animals
US-Vietnam: plant variety protection
Comes in different forms - patents, plant variety protection, geographic indication
Global Proprietary Seed Market2009: US$32B
US$18B increase from 2001 fgures
Attributed to increased use traits and stacked trait corn (GM corn) in South America
Vegetable seed industry: US$3.8B
Growing businessIn 2000
Dow (US) with 30% pending applications on gene sequences for corn
Ribosome (US) with 72% application for potatoes Dupont (US) with 41% application for wheat genes
2010: increasing trend towards patenting products of conventional breeding (not GMOs) Test case under EPO: brocolli (Bioscience) - patent application on seeds and breeding method
wrinkled tomato (Israel) - ‘essentially biological processes’
Review of some patent application on plants in the Philippines (as inventions) Rice transposone gene by Japan Science and Technology Agency
Process of transformation of rice using transposon gene + transformed rice (seeds and plants) + methods of use - Japan Science and Technology Agency
Seed production of hybrid rice - Peijin Huang by Hainan Province, China
Herbicide resistant rice - Timothy Croughan of USA
Method of breeding rice plants of new variety with resistance to herbicides - Hokko Chemical Industry, Japan
Impacts of IPR
Control over seeds and food and agriculture production
Form of enclosure for farmers and for consumers (we pay for these IPR) Limits research: need to pay for the license to use the genes or the seeds for research
Privatization of resource: genetic resource Limits access by poor farmers on materials unless it is paid for (other side: creates dependency)
Goes against Farmers’ Rights to save, use, sell and exchange seeds Cornerstone of rich agricultural biodiversity - the base for our food security
Traditional Seeds
HYVs Hybrid Seeds
GMOs GURTS(terminator)
Seed saving can be saved and re-planted
Can be saved and re-planted
Can be saved and re-planted but quality deterioratesEncourage use of fresh seeds every season
Coupled with hybrid technologyPreference for use of fresh seeds every season
No seed saving (sterile seeds)
Developer Farmers Public research institution
Public research institutionCorporations
CorporationsPublic research institution (testing)
Corporations
Farmers’ Access
Farmer to farmer
Extension agents/govt program
Seed industry/Corporations through research and extension system
Seed industry/corporationsthrough research and extension system
TRENDS: SEED TECHNOLOGY
Traditional Seeds
HYVs Hybrid Seeds
GMOs GURTS(terminator)
Breeding process
Natural selection
Off-type selection
compositesheterogenous
With hybridization + dwarfing gene
Different techniques
Homogenous population
Large scale hybridization
No further selection from F1
homogenous
Gene technology (genetic engineering)
homogenous
gene technology
Adaptation Site specific For wide adaptation in prime areas
For wide adaptation for prime areas but with site specific responses
Wide adaptation
wide adaptation
Role of women
Seed keeper Seed keeper ? ? ?
Farmers supply bulk of seeds
Supplies 80-90% of seed requirement
informal seed system by farmers
Photo: CBDC-Nan
Remains untapped, not priority area
Actual partition of rice seed supply in Vietnam
Formal sector
Seed Centers and State-owned Enterprises
Informal sector
Farm-saved seed
Local Tradingand Exchange
Private companies
The total seed requirement
From Presentation of Michael Turner, Danida