ipin 2013 single-channel v ersus multi-channel scanning in

12
WNLab - October 28-31th 2013 IPIN 2013 Single-Channel Versus Multi-Channel Scanning in Device-Free Indoor Radio Localization Montbéliard, Belford, Franc P. Cassarà; F. Potortì; P. Barsocchi; P. Nepa

Upload: zahi

Post on 28-Jan-2016

45 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

IPIN 2013 Single-Channel V ersus Multi-Channel Scanning in Device-Free Indoor Radio Localization. P. Cassarà; F. Potortì; P. Barsocchi; P. Nepa. Montbéliard, Belford, France. Outline. Scenario The Inverse Problem Data Acquisition Numerical Results Conclusions. Scenario. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IPIN 2013 Single-Channel  V ersus  Multi-Channel Scanning  in

WNLab -

October 28-31th 2013

IPIN 2013

Single-Channel Versus Multi-Channel Scanning inDevice-Free Indoor Radio

Localization

Montbéliard, Belford, France

P. Cassarà; F. Potortì; P. Barsocchi; P. Nepa

Page 2: IPIN 2013 Single-Channel  V ersus  Multi-Channel Scanning  in

WNLab -

Outline

2

Scenario

The Inverse Problem

Data Acquisition

Numerical Results

Conclusions

Page 3: IPIN 2013 Single-Channel  V ersus  Multi-Channel Scanning  in

WNLab - 3

Scenario

Time Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_Node_1…Ch_Node_n

Data Record

Scenario for device-free indoor localization

IRIS Mote

Page 4: IPIN 2013 Single-Channel  V ersus  Multi-Channel Scanning  in

WNLab - 4

The Inverse Problem

Variance-Based RTI Model

This kind of algorithm maps the shadowing measured over the links in to the shadowing over the set of pixel.

Page 5: IPIN 2013 Single-Channel  V ersus  Multi-Channel Scanning  in

WNLab -

Data Acquisition

5

Time Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_Node_1…Ch_Node_nTime Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_Node_1…Ch_Node_n

Time Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_Node_1…Ch_Node_n

Time Stamp; RSS_Link_1…RSS_Link_l

Time Stamp; RSS_Link_1…RSS_Link_l

Time Stamp; RSS_Link_1…RSS_Link_l

sliding window for the variance evaluation

The data are acquired as the values of RSS received by the ID_RX from all the other nodes into the sensor network for a given channel…

Data formatting

Page 6: IPIN 2013 Single-Channel  V ersus  Multi-Channel Scanning  in

WNLab -

Numerical ResultsThe raw comparison between multi-channel and single-channel

6

Lengths of the sliding window 3sec and 5 sec

Multi-channel over two and four channels

The figures show the comparison of the algorithm’s performance for measurements achieved in single-channel and multi-channel mode

Page 7: IPIN 2013 Single-Channel  V ersus  Multi-Channel Scanning  in

WNLab -

Numerical Results

The comparison between multi-channel and single-channel on equal terms

7

Lengths of the sliding window 3sec and 5 sec

Multi-channel over two channels

The figures show the comparison of the algorithm’s performance for measurements achieved in single-channel and multi-channel mode but the single-channel is filtered from multi-channel measurements

Page 8: IPIN 2013 Single-Channel  V ersus  Multi-Channel Scanning  in

WNLab -

Numerical Results

Again comparison between multi-channel and single-channel on equal terms

8

Lengths of the sliding window 10 sec

Multi-channel over four channels

The figures show the comparison of the algorithm’s performance for measurements achieved in single-channel and multi-channel mode but the single-channel is filtered from multi-channel measurements

Page 9: IPIN 2013 Single-Channel  V ersus  Multi-Channel Scanning  in

WNLab -

Numerical Results

The influence of the channel information...

9

Lengths of the sliding window 3 and 5 sec

Multi-channel over two and four channels

In this case the data are collected over many channels, but the algorithm works in either single-channel (discarding the channel info) or multi-channel mode

Time Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_Node_1…Ch_Node_nTime Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_Node_1…Ch_Node_n

Time Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_Node_1…Ch_Node_n

Time Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_1…Ch_1Time Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_1…Ch_1

Time Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_1…Ch_1

Page 10: IPIN 2013 Single-Channel  V ersus  Multi-Channel Scanning  in

WNLab -

Numerical Results

Again about the influence of the channel information...

10

Lengths of the sliding window 3 and 5 sec

Fake multi-channel over four channels

In this case the data are collected over the single-channel, but the algorithm works in either single-channel or a fake multi-channel

Time Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_Node_1…Ch_Node_nTime Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_Node_1…Ch_Node_n

Time Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_Node_1…Ch_Node_n

Time Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_1…Ch_1Time Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_1…Ch_1

Time Stamp; ID_Rx; RSS_1…RSS_n; Ch_1…Ch_1

Page 11: IPIN 2013 Single-Channel  V ersus  Multi-Channel Scanning  in

WNLab -

Conclusions

Develop a multi-channel localization algorithm may be more complex because

to get enough sample you need to increase the acquisition rate of the nodes

the sensor network needs to handle a data traffic that is the data traffic for the single-channel acquisition by the number of channels

the algorithm needs to elaborate a set of data that is the set of data for the single-channel by the number of channels

The measurements shows that apparently the multi-channel doesn't give remarkable advantages on the VRTI-based localization algorithm, to detriment of the system complexity

Page 12: IPIN 2013 Single-Channel  V ersus  Multi-Channel Scanning  in

WNLab -

Thanks !

12