ip backed financing

1
IP BACKED FINANCING Top Companies – raising Financing (by no. of applications) General Motors 15,866 12,946 Avago Technologies 10,023 Alcatel Lucent 8,438 Kodak 8,149 Freescale 5,910 Seagate 4,609 Dell 3,162 Avaya 2,914 Chrysler 2,313 Ps4 Luxco Top Financing Entities (by no. of applications) Major Industries - raising Financing (by no. of applications) Financing Entities vs Companies (Transactions) Trends Banks vs Transacted Technologies 1. Kodak (5,329) 2. Seagate (5,243) 3. Chrysler (2,548) 1. Kodak (5,329) 2. Dell (4,603) 3. Scient Games Int (2,242) 1. Freescale (8,156) 2. General Motors (7,465) 3. Kodak (7,762) 1. Avago (12,955) 2. Unisys (1,807) 3. Ciena (1,569) 1. Alcatel Lucent (10,026) 2. Carestream (1,011) 3. Novell (559) 1. Avaya (3,096) 2. Dell (4,464) 3. Momentive (1,300) 1. Seagate (5,486) 2. Spectrum Brands (1,169) 3. Quantum Corp (657) 1. General Motors (14,731) 2. Kodak (5,917) 3. Optis Wireless Tech. (636) 1. Unisys (1,583) 2. Affymetrix Inc. (604) 3. Heritage Home Group (389) 1. General Motors (9,709) 2. Chrysler (2,540) Transportation Data Storage Digital Data Processing Digital Communication IT Methods for Management Television & Video Transmission Mechanical Elements Medical Devices Tele - communications Semiconductors 4,898 4,778 3,770 2,340 2,324 2,176 2,171 1,877 1,866 1,331 Industry No. of Applications 6,650 4,075 2,750 2,586 2,152 1,826 1,727 1,421 1,407 1,318 Digital Data Processing Digital Communication Checking Devices Industry No. of Applications IT Methods for Management Printing Containers & Packagers Television & Video Transmission Polymers Mechanical Elements Gaming 1. Avago (3,310) 2. Dell (2,819) 3. Freescale (1,611) 1. Alcatel Lucent (5,800) 2. Avago (1,649) 3. Avaya (1,448) 1. Endo Pharmaceutical (576) 2. Hologic (444) 3. Masimo Corp (366) 1. Freescale (2,975) 2. Avago (2,532) 3. Ps4 Luxco (1,064) 1. General Motors (6,108) 2. Chrysler (1,245) 3. Lear (887) 1. First Data Corp (536) 2. AOL (361) 3. Alcatel Lucent (331) 1. Seagate (4,750) 2. Avago (1,334) 3. Ps4 Luxco (1,213) 1. Alcatel Lucent (1,743) 2. Avaya (1,377) 3. Aspect Software (415) 1. General Motors (3,324) 2. Chrysler (450) 3. Federal Mogul Corp (361) Sources: http://www.ipos.gov.sg/IPforYou/IPforBusinesses/IPFinancingScheme.aspx http://www.srr.com/article/financing-alternatives-companies-using-intellectual-property-collateral http://www.asiaiplaw.com/article/41/1817/ http://www.ipo.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Securitisation_of_IP_in_the_US.pdf http://www.patent-innovations.com/documents/201306LimitedMonopoly-PatentsasCollateral.pdf http://patent-lawyers.usattorneys.com/alcatellucent-patent-monetization-program-microsoft-sues-samsung-patent-royalty-war/ http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2356015 http://www.wpto.com.tw/en/news-detail.php?nid=746 http://www.worldipreview.com/article/new-focus-on-ip-valuation-in-2013 http://www.kimchang.com/newsletter/templates/newsletter_ip_en_summerFall2013_article08.html http://business.asiaone.com/news/intellectual-property-collateral-companies http://amsacta.unibo.it/2705/1/Munari_Odasso_Toschi_EE_Chapter.pdf http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/valuation-and-exploitation-of-intellectual-property_307034817055 http://www.iam-media.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=7d2e49be-4f84-461a-939e-2fb73664db2a http://www.iam-media.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=481b76b6-637f-427f-b8d6-78d06cece504 https://www.relecura.com/reports/IP_Backed_Financing.pdf https://www.iconfinder.com/ Disclaimer: This infographic, including the information and analysis and any opinion or recommendation, is neither legal advice nor intended for investment purposes. This document is not warranted to be error-free, nor subject to any other warranties or conditions, whether expressed orally or implied in law, including implied warranties and conditions of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. INDUS TechInnovations specifically disclaims any liability with respect to this document and no contractual obligations are formed either directly or indirectly by this document. Copyright © 2015 Relecura Inc. All rights reserved. Infographic created by: www.relecura.com [email protected] The data represented holds patent assignments for a 6 year period (2009-14) portraying the patent transaction records by entities employing intangible assets as a route to raise debt financing. 208 123 27 26 23 19 17 16 4,438 3,332 3,227 2,914 2,273 2,183 1,957 1,342 1,301 1,220 No. of Applications Transportation Digital Data Processing Semiconductors Mechanical Elements Engines, Pumps & Turbines Printing Television & Video Transmission Polymers Digital Communication Green Technology Industry 185 79 43 37 20 15 22 JP Morgan Chase Bank of America Citigroup No. of High Quality Patent Applications Organization No. of High Quality Patent Applications Assignors 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 JP Morgan Chase 9,334 4,762 6,421 5,453 10,898 9,498 Bank of America 5,042 5,117 4,482 4,080 19,737 8,674 Citigroup 9,380 6,485 2,896 9,829 3,331 2,410 Execution Year Trends 2011 2010 2009 2014 2013 2012 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Filing Year Trends JP Morgan Chase Bank of America Citigroup Some of the patents held as collateral were filed in the 1980s and 1990s. Patent Assignment Execution Trend 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 43,490 53,911 43,236 45,173 71,147 66,918 The execution trend is based on 896,254 transactions comprising of 333,577 applications*. *An application refers to a set of patent transactions with the same application number, representing a single application. 6 6 3 2 2 No. of High Quality Patent Applications Organization 164 103 102 45 45 27 27 22 18 16 46,897 34,658 32,716 31,369 27,172 18,758 16,142 12,774 48,804 12,212 Wells Fargo Wilmington Trust Credit Suisse The Bank of New York Mellon GE Capital US Treasury Citigroup Deutsche Bank Bank of America JP Morgan Chase 1. Kodak (1,820) 2. Rovi Corp (1,373) 3. Arris Group (535) Year Country Government / Bank Scheme / Purpose Offerings 1995 Japan Development Bank of Japan Loans to companies in middle development stage 16 billion Yen for 260 IP backed loans (in a decade) 2010 China State Intellectual Property Office IPR Pledge Financing Program(started in 2008) 25 billion Yuan for 2000 projects 2013 Malaysia Government IPR Financing Fund Scheme RM200 million (US$65 million) 2013 Korea Korea Development Bank Loan programs by pledging IPR as collateral 2 billion Korean Won (about US$1.8 million) 2014 Singapore Government IP 101 (loans using IP as collateral) $100 million 2014 China China Development Bank Loan to Quanlin paper against a portfolio of trademark and patent rights RMB7.9 million (approx. $1.3 billion) against a portfolio of 110 patents and 34 trademarks N/A Germany Landesbank Rheinland- Pfalz Financing of development projects of mid-size companies (technical documentation of research projects as collateral) 40 transactions for EUR140 million (in a 4 year period) IP Financing Schemes Company Financial Entity Loan Raised (Patents) GIK Worldwide Pitney Bowes Capital US$57 million Eastman Kodak Citicorp North America, Inc. US$950 million (7766 patents) Insite Vision Bank of New York US$6 million (32 pharma patents) Cambridge Display Technologies Lloyds TSB US$15 million Alcatel Lucent Goldman Sachs & Credit Suisse US$2.1 billion started company The General Electric Company Thomas Alva Edison in 1880’s Incandescent Electric Light Bulb Patent as collateral Secure Financing Other Instances IP Financing Process IP Backed Loan Cases IP Asset (R&D & Technology Sector) Financial Entities (Bank, Venture Capitalist, Company Financing Arm) Valuation (Cost Based, Market Based, Income Based) Formal Application (To Financial Entities) IP Backed Financing (Loans, Securitization, Sale & License Back ) IP as a collateral can be defined as “a borrower’s pledge of specific property, such as future Cash Flows from existing IP assets, or rights to the underlying IP itself, in order to provide recourse for the lender in the event of loan default ”. The First Instance

Upload: relecura-inc

Post on 29-Jul-2015

67 views

Category:

Data & Analytics


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

IP BACKED FINANCING

Top Companies – raising Financing (by no. of applications)

General Motors 15,866

12,946 Avago Technologies

10,023 Alcatel Lucent

8,438 Kodak

8,149 Freescale

5,910 Seagate

4,609 Dell

3,162 Avaya

2,914 Chrysler

2,313 Ps4 Luxco

Top Financing Entities (by no. of applications)

Major Industries - raising Financing (by no. of applications)

Financing Entities vs Companies (Transactions) Trends

Banks vs Transacted Technologies

1. Kodak (5,329) 2. Seagate (5,243) 3. Chrysler (2,548)

1. Kodak (5,329) 2. Dell (4,603) 3. Scient Games Int (2,242)

1. Freescale (8,156) 2. General Motors (7,465) 3. Kodak (7,762)

1. Avago (12,955) 2. Unisys (1,807) 3. Ciena (1,569)

1. Alcatel Lucent (10,026) 2. Carestream (1,011) 3. Novell (559)

1. Avaya (3,096) 2. Dell (4,464) 3. Momentive (1,300)

1. Seagate (5,486) 2. Spectrum Brands (1,169) 3. Quantum Corp (657)

1. General Motors (14,731) 2. Kodak (5,917) 3. Optis Wireless Tech. (636)

1. Unisys (1,583) 2. Affymetrix Inc. (604) 3. Heritage Home Group (389)

1. General Motors (9,709) 2. Chrysler (2,540)

Transportation Data Storage Digital Data Processing

Digital Communication

IT Methods for Management

Television & Video Transmission

Mechanical Elements

Medical Devices

Tele - communications Semiconductors

4,898 4,778 3,770 2,340 2,324 2,176 2,171 1,877 1,866 1,331

Industry

No. of Applications

6,650 4,075 2,750 2,586 2,152 1,826 1,727 1,421 1,407 1,318

Digital Data Processing

Digital Communication

Checking Devices

Industry

No. of Applications

IT Methods for Management Printing

Containers & Packagers

Television & Video Transmission Polymers

Mechanical Elements Gaming

1. Avago (3,310) 2. Dell (2,819) 3. Freescale (1,611)

1. Alcatel Lucent (5,800) 2. Avago (1,649) 3. Avaya (1,448)

1. Endo Pharmaceutical (576) 2. Hologic (444) 3. Masimo Corp (366)

1. Freescale (2,975) 2. Avago (2,532) 3. Ps4 Luxco (1,064)

1. General Motors (6,108) 2. Chrysler (1,245) 3. Lear (887)

1. First Data Corp (536) 2. AOL (361) 3. Alcatel Lucent (331)

1. Seagate (4,750) 2. Avago (1,334) 3. Ps4 Luxco (1,213)

1. Alcatel Lucent (1,743) 2. Avaya (1,377) 3. Aspect Software (415)

1. General Motors (3,324) 2. Chrysler (450) 3. Federal Mogul Corp (361)

Sources: http://www.ipos.gov.sg/IPforYou/IPforBusinesses/IPFinancingScheme.aspx http://www.srr.com/article/financing-alternatives-companies-using-intellectual-property-collateral http://www.asiaiplaw.com/article/41/1817/ http://www.ipo.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Securitisation_of_IP_in_the_US.pdf http://www.patent-innovations.com/documents/201306LimitedMonopoly-PatentsasCollateral.pdf http://patent-lawyers.usattorneys.com/alcatellucent-patent-monetization-program-microsoft-sues-samsung-patent-royalty-war/ http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2356015 http://www.wpto.com.tw/en/news-detail.php?nid=746 http://www.worldipreview.com/article/new-focus-on-ip-valuation-in-2013 http://www.kimchang.com/newsletter/templates/newsletter_ip_en_summerFall2013_article08.html http://business.asiaone.com/news/intellectual-property-collateral-companies http://amsacta.unibo.it/2705/1/Munari_Odasso_Toschi_EE_Chapter.pdf http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/valuation-and-exploitation-of-intellectual-property_307034817055 http://www.iam-media.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=7d2e49be-4f84-461a-939e-2fb73664db2a http://www.iam-media.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=481b76b6-637f-427f-b8d6-78d06cece504 https://www.relecura.com/reports/IP_Backed_Financing.pdf https://www.iconfinder.com/

Disclaimer: This infographic, including the information and analysis and any opinion or recommendation, is neither legal advice nor intended for investment purposes. This document is not warranted to be error-free, nor subject to any other warranties or conditions, whether expressed orally or implied in law, including implied warranties and conditions of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. INDUS TechInnovations specifically disclaims any liability with respect to this document and no contractual obligations are formed either directly or indirectly by this document. Copyright © 2015 Relecura Inc. All rights reserved.

Infographic created by:

www.relecura.com

[email protected]

The data represented holds patent assignments for a 6 year period (2009-14) portraying the patent transaction records by entities employing intangible assets as a route to raise debt financing.

208 123 27 26 23 19 17 16

4,438 3,332 3,227 2,914 2,273 2,183 1,957 1,342 1,301 1,220 No. of

Applications

Transportation

Digital Data Processing Semiconductors

Mechanical Elements

Engines, Pumps & Turbines Printing

Television & Video Transmission Polymers

Digital Communication Green Technology Industry

185 79 43 37 20

15 22

JP Morgan Chase

Bank of America

Citigroup

No. of High Quality Patent Applications

Organization

No. of High Quality Patent Applications

Assignors

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

1 2 3 4 5 6

JP Morgan Chase 9,334 4,762 6,421 5,453 10,898 9,498

Bank of America 5,042 5,117 4,482 4,080 19,737 8,674

Citigroup 9,380 6,485 2,896 9,829 3,331 2,410

Execution Year Trends

2011 2010 2009 2014 2013 2012

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Filing Year Trends

JP Morgan Chase Bank of America Citigroup Some of the patents held as collateral were filed in the 1980s and 1990s.

Patent Assignment Execution Trend

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

43,490

53,911

43,236 45,173

71,147 66,918 The execution trend is

based on 896,254 transactions comprising of

333,577 applications*. *An application refers to a set of patent transactions with the same application

number, representing a single application.

6 6 3 2 2

No. of High Quality Patent Applications

Organization

164 103 102 45 45 27 27 22 18 16

46,897 34,658 32,716 31,369 27,172 18,758 16,142 12,774 48,804 12,212

Wel

ls F

argo

Wilm

ingt

on

Tru

st

Cre

dit

Su

isse

The

Ban

k o

f

New

Yo

rk M

ello

n

GE

Cap

ital

US

Trea

sury

Cit

igro

up

Deu

tsch

e B

ank

Ban

k o

f A

mer

ica

JP M

org

an C

has

e

1. Kodak (1,820) 2. Rovi Corp (1,373) 3. Arris Group (535)

Year Country Government / Bank Scheme / Purpose Offerings

1995 Japan Development Bank of Japan

Loans to companies in middle development

stage

16 billion Yen for 260 IP backed loans (in a

decade)

2010 China State Intellectual Property Office

IPR Pledge Financing Program(started in 2008)

25 billion Yuan for 2000 projects

2013 Malaysia Government IPR Financing Fund Scheme

RM200 million (US$65 million)

2013 Korea Korea Development Bank

Loan programs by pledging IPR as collateral

2 billion Korean Won (about US$1.8

million)

2014 Singapore Government IP 101 (loans using IP as collateral)

$100 million

2014 China China Development Bank

Loan to Quanlin paper against a portfolio of

trademark and patent rights

RMB7.9 million (approx. $1.3 billion) against a portfolio of 110 patents and 34

trademarks

N/A Germany Landesbank Rheinland-Pfalz

Financing of development projects of

mid-size companies (technical

documentation of research projects as

collateral)

40 transactions for EUR140 million (in a

4 year period)

IP Financing Schemes

Company Financial Entity Loan Raised (Patents)

GIK Worldwide Pitney Bowes Capital US$57 million

Eastman Kodak Citicorp North America, Inc. US$950 million (7766 patents)

Insite Vision Bank of New York US$6 million (32 pharma patents)

Cambridge Display Technologies

Lloyds TSB US$15 million

Alcatel Lucent Goldman Sachs & Credit Suisse

US$2.1 billion

started company

The General Electric Company

Thomas Alva Edison

in 1880’s

Incandescent Electric Light Bulb Patent

as collateral

Secure Financing

Other Instances

IP Financing Process

IP Backed Loan Cases

IP Asset (R&D &

Technology Sector)

Financial Entities (Bank, Venture

Capitalist, Company

Financing Arm)

Valuation (Cost Based,

Market Based, Income Based)

Formal Application (To Financial

Entities)

IP Backed Financing

(Loans, Securitization, Sale

& License Back )

IP as a collateral can be defined as “a borrower’s pledge of specific property, such as future Cash Flows from existing IP assets, or rights to the underlying IP itself, in order

to provide recourse for the lender in the event of loan default”.

The First Instance