investor discussion pack - westpac · 3 investor discussion pack – full year 2002 a...

70
Investor Discussion Pack November/December 2002

Upload: others

Post on 27-May-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Investor Discussion Pack

November/December 2002

2 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Index

Summary of 2002 earnings and acquisitions/divestments 3Points of differentiation 10

Strategy 12Customer base 13Low risk – stressed loans, provisioning and capital generation 14Sustainability, staff, customers, community 17

What the market is saying 20Wealth management position and acquisitions 22Wealth management integration 25Housing market 28Offshore exposures 32Tax rate 34Significant items 35Growth outlook 39SME portfolio growth 42

Outlook 45Supplementary information 51

Composition of portfolio 52Credit risk 59Analysis of margins 62Capital 66Earnings reconciliation 68

3 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

A transformational year

• Earnings momentum maintained- Record reported earnings of $2,192m up 15%- Underlying cash earnings (before significant items) up 9% - Ongoing cash earnings up 12%- Dividend of 70 cents per share fully franked up 13%- Return on equity maintained above 20%

• Business repositioned for growth- Sold AGC- Acquired Rothschild Australia Asset Management - Acquired BT Financial Group- Acquired Hastings Funds Management

• Quality of earnings significantly improved- Exited higher risk finance company and acquired lower risk wealth management business

further diversifying income streams- Brought significant items to account:

Ú Removed embedded valueÚ Ceased capitalising expenditure for outsourcing of operations Ú High yield debt portfolio written down to fair valueÚ Adopted international accounting standard for superannuation asset

- Improved asset quality, with net impaired assets declining 32%

4 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Reconciliation of ongoing earnings

2%

6%

98

(51)

100

(48)

Add goodwill

Less distributions on other equity instruments

9%1,9012,063Underlying cash earnings

12%1,7491,957Ongoing cash earnings

(106)

2,011

(181)

2,192

2002 % Change2001$m

(30%)(152)Less AGC profit after tax

Large(49)Less individually significant items1

8%1,854Underlying NPAT

15%1,903Reported NPAT

1Individually significant items in 2001 includes embedded value uplift

5 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

1,901

129320 28 38 2,063

1,600

1,650

1,700

1,750

1,800

1,850

1,900

1,950

2,000

2,050

2,100

Sep-01 Operatingincome

Expenses Bad & DDs Tax Other Sep-02

$m

Underlying cash earnings up 9%

Sound revenue growth offset by loss of 4 months of AGC

earnings

Expenses 1% lower over the year

Increase due principally to a small number of high

profile defaults

Lower corporate tax rate and offshore losses reduced tax charge

Cash return on ordinary equity 21%

6 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Dividends

• Dividends up 13%

• 5 year CAGR 12% p.a.

• Pay-out ratio on underlying cash earnings increased from 59% to 61%

• Fully franked dividend yield 5.1% approx

• $400m returned to shareholders via buy-back

3943

47

54

62

70

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Cents per share

7 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Business unit performance

-100 0 100 200 300 400

Aust other wealth

NZ Funds Mgt

NZ life

Aust Life

Pacific Bank

NZ Retail

Instit. Bank

Aust Funds Mgt

Business Products

Consumer Distr.

Bus. & Reg. Banking

Consumer Products

20012002

8

12

13

15

69

56

63

(50)

(2)

(2)

(20)

(93)

-100 -50 0 50 100

* Ongoing businesses (excludes group items)

Net Profit Contribution to growth

$m $m

8 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Low growth/higher risk business

Rated funds & distribution

Infrastructure expertise

Platform and product capability, funds scale

AGC divestment

Rothschild acquisition

Hastings acquisition

BT Financial Group acquisition

Core strategic rationaleCorporate activity

Rebalanced business mix

• Near-term strategic agenda complete

• Integration and transition of BT and Rothschild creating some near term earnings dilution

• Rebalancing business mix has improved growth path while retaining a ROE above 20%

(0.3%)(1.1%)(2.6%)Earnings impact1,8471,8271,807Post buyback shares1,8721,8521,832Number of shares pre buy-back

(14)(14)(14)Funding of buyback264(8)Total654Hastings7(11)(18)BT

13106RAAMAcquisitions

(56)(51)(68)Net AGC earnings foregone1

(44) (61) (90)Net cash earnings

2003 20052004

1. Includes AGC earnings forgone, earnings on cash proceeds received and earnings on business portfolio re-acquired

Cumulative earnings impact of recent transactions

9 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

r-g

Economic profit• Value =

Improving growth trajectory

• Growth rates a critical value determinate

• Underlying profit from the AGC auto and consumer businesses had declined in the two years prior to 2002

• Industry consensus estimates wealth management businesses to grow in the order of 10% - 12%.

Sustainable Growth%

Return on Equity less Cost of equity

The return/growth indifference curve

NPV1

NPV2

Typical P/E1

Growth rate

18-2210%-12%Growth in wealth management businesses

12-14<0%Growth rate in AGC consumer & auto businesses

Strategy based on premise that value is a function of return and growth

1. Typical PEs from comparable companies

Points of differentiation

November/December 2002

11 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Points of differentiation

• Strategy- Focused on core markets of Australia, New Zealand and near Pacific- Customer centric organisational structure- Balanced wealth management position

• Customer franchise- # 1 or # 2 market share in major customer segments in Australia and New Zealand- Customer based skewed to higher value segments

• Low risk - De-risked income streams- Further improvement in asset quality, and sound provisioning coverage- Strong surplus capital generation capacity

• Leader in sustainability- Highly committed workforce- Number 1 Dow Jones Sustainability Index- Number 1 Sydney Morning Herald / The Age Good Reputation Index

12 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

A straightforward strategy – well executed

Customer focus

Product innovation

Process /cost efficiency

• Broadening customer relationships

• Wealth management integration

• Driving operational efficiency

• Embedding a high performance culture

• Building strong corporate reputation

13 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Customer base skewed to higher value demographics

Sources1. Reported customer numbers 2. KPMG FIPS NZ 2002, AC Nielson, Greenwich3. Greenwich Associates4. Corporate transactional business – Greenwich Associates5. Greenwich large corporate banking survey (9/01)6. Retail funds under management ASSIRT Sept 20027. Melville Jessup Weaver, Investment Survey, March 2002

2514Corporate

New ZealandAustralia

Wealth management

Business

Consumer

5746

2223

1221

Australian value quintiles1

10

15

20

25

30

First Second Third Fourth Fifth

%

Population distribution

Distribution of Westpac'sAustralian customer base

1Source: Roy Morgan Research : Ranking of Australians by education, income and occupation

Increasing value

Position in core markets

Customer numbersAustralia 6.0mNew Zealand 1.3mOther 0.2mTotal 7.5m

14 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Low risk - stressed loans remain near historic lows

Exposure by credit grade - stressed loans*% of total commitments

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

Sep96

Sep97

Sep98

Sep99

Sep00

Sep01

Sep02

AGC stressed loans

Impaired

90 days past due well secured

Watchlist & substandard

* Includes retail stressed loans

• Net impaired assets down $223m on September 2001

- $95m from 2 large write-offs

- $51m from sale of AGC

• Signs that corporate downgrades and defaults are easing

• Business banking credit quality remains strong

• Quality of mortgage book outstanding

• Expected increase in stressed unsecured consumer loans remains within planned tolerances

15 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Specific provisions / impaired assets (%)

%

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 1H02 FY02

WBC ANZ CBA NAB

General provisions / non-housing performing loans (%)

Low risk – sound provisioning cover

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 1H02 FY02

WBC ANZ CBA NAB

16 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Surplus capital generation continues to be a strength

4.8%

5.8%

2.8%

12.3%

20.1%

% of avg ordinary equity

Delivers 3-4 bps increase in Tier 1 ratio per month489Growth in surplus capital

To fund 8% growth in risk weighted assets (597)Reinvested for growth

DRP participation 23%

Payout ratio 61.3%

Strong cash returns

Comments

289

(1,266)

2,063

10,269

$ million

Clawback through Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRP)

Dividends paid

Cash earnings

Average ordinary equity

17 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Enhanced sustainability - staff

7%

1%

7%

3%

8%

8%

8%

8%

3%

5%

7%

25%

0% 10% 20% 30%

N/A

87

77

74

73

72

67

65

65

64

62

61

59

30

0 20 40 60 80

Employee Engagement

Working RelationshipsCompetitive Position & Customer Experience

Work Processes/Systems

Leadership

Employee Commitment

Training, Learning & Development

Communication

Organisational Change

Performance

Pay

Morale Index

Community Involvement

Percent above / below Global Financial Services Norm 2002

2002 vs 2001 percent increase over year

Staff perspectives survey 2002

1%

7%

9%

3%

3%

8%

2%

7%

15%

17%

3.4%

0% 10% 20% 30%

N/A

N/A

Westpac Overall 2002 Category Summary

% Favourable Response

18 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Enhanced sustainability - customers

0

5

10

15

20

Mar-99 Sep-02

%

Per

cen

t in

Seg

men

t

Economic Profit

Value Shift

Low HighCustomer Value Segments

-ve +ve

0

5

10

15

WBC ANZ CBA NAB

%

Middle Markets Small Business Markets

Business customer satisfaction-very satisfied customers2

2 Source Greenwich Associates

*average of other major banks

50

55

60

65

70

Sep-00 Dec-00 Mar-01 Jun-01 Sep-01 Dec-01 Mar-02 Jun-02

Westpac Peer average*

% of personal MFI customers very or fairly satisified1

1 Source Roy Morgan Research June 2002

19 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Enhanced sustainability - governance and reputation

Number 1 Sydney Morning Herald / The Age Good Reputation Index 2002

Number 1 bank globally in Dow Jones Sustainability Index 2002/03

First social impact report produced

What the market is saying

November/December 2002

21 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

What the market is saying

• What is Westpac’s wealth management strategy and how is value going to be created?

• What are the risks in the wealth management integration?

• What are the risks in the housing cycle?

• What are the significant items?

• Overseas exposures - what is Westpac’s position?

• Why was the 2002 tax rate so low?

• What are the business drivers behind the 2003 outlook?

• SME business, when do we expect a pick-up and what is the quality of new lending?

22 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Wealth management - operating across the value chain

Customers Distribution & Advice

BundlingPlatform

ProductManufacture

InvestmentManagement Back Office

Outsourced partners for funds admin

Centralised servicing centre for wrap

Core Australian equites style

External mangers for International equities, hedge funds, property and fixed interest

Broad product range

Proven servicing capability

Leading wrap and corporate super platforms

700 Westpac planners & advisers

1,000 premier planners

Over 15,000 EFAs

7.5 Million Westpac customers

Access to non-Westpac customers though EFA networks

• Wealth management position now complete with strong capability across the value chain

• Open architecture model provides significant benefits:

- Ensures each element of the chain remains efficient by competing in the market

- Provides optionality in business model, resources can be redirected to elements of the chain generating the greatest value

• Focused on the ‘new’ and growing elements of wealth management without excess baggage of lower growth life insurance business

23 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

• Price $900m - net asset value $128m

• EPS positive end 2004

• Retail funds outflow assumed to continue into 2003, turning around by end 2004 - base case

• Price represents 81% of assessed value with all revenue benefits and 25% of cost synergies retained

Wealth management - BT acquisition and value acquired

34%Portfolio services–Wrap & Corp Super

Total

Total

100%

20%

5%

41%

Margin lending and wholesale funds

New Zealand

Retail product and distribution

76% of value attributed to

portfolio services and retail

distribution

Components of value – as at 29 Aug 2002

24 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Wealth management - BT synergies higher than expected

Implementation costs ($m)

43 45 4259 55

81

21

36 6

1110

0

20

40

60

80

100

120Increased revenue contributionCost savings

51

70

FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005

Valu

ation

A

ssum

ptio

ns

4648

Pro

gram

T

arget

Valu

ation

A

ssum

ptio

ns

Pro

gram

T

arget

Valu

ation

A

ssum

ptio

ns

Pro

gram

T

arget

65

102

Synergies identified ($m)

• Following nine week design phase, consolidated synergies are now estimated at $102m pa in FY05 with implementation costs of ~$142m

142Total

5Future expense

70Fair Value Adjustment to BT

67Charged in Westpac

25 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Wealth management – controlling integration risks

è Key management team appointed

è Organisational structure confirmed

è Operating model confirmed

è Office location confirmed

è Rapidly implementing integration program

People/ systems

è Review of cost and revenue synergies completed

è Accountability for delivery in placeDelivery on synergies

è BT investment management team not acquired

è Putnam appointed for international equities

è Transfer of BT funds to the rated investment management team

Retail funds outflows

è Dedicated integration team in place

è Internal distribution network is quarantined from integrationDiversion

Mitigating strategies/actions

26 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Q3 ‘02 Q4 ‘02 Q1 ‘03 Q2 ‘03

Management team confirmed

Investment team confirmed

Putnam selected

BT Wrap rollout

Corporate Super rollout

Call centre consolidation

Brand approved

1st Co-Locations

Single customer view

Wealth management – key milestones

56789

101112

Sep 02 Oct 02 Dec 02 Dec 03 Dec 04 Dec-05

$bn

Net retail FUM against model*

Acquisition modelActual

• Funds flow tracking expectations

• Expect funds net outflow until Dec 03, tracking the market in 04 before rising in 05

• Should funds outflow exceed expectations by $1bn this impacts valuation by $40m

* Indicative stock of funds under management assuming 0% investment returns

27 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Wealth management – combined funds under management

Other includes FX, currency, and asset allocation

8.64.41.62.6International equities

3.31.00.12.2Other

11.23.13.05.1Australian equities

2.61.00.61.0International fixed interest

4.00.81.61.6Property

22.8

3.8

6.5

WBC $bn

7.91.92.2Australian fixed interest

47.114.79.6Total FUM

9.52.50.5Cash and liquid assets

Total $bnBT $bn

Rothschild $bnAsset class

28 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Housing market - state of play

• Growth in system housing lending has been strong, increasing over 19% for year to September 2002

• Market growth supported by:

- Increase in investment loans

- Government subsidy for first home owners

- Regearing of the housing sector as Australia has shifted to a lower inflationary environment

• Led to significant house price increases of circa 40% over last two years

• Despite these factors, affordability is not stretched and household debt has not significantly increased as a proportion of household wealth

• System housing volumes expected to ease in the year ahead

0%

5%10%

15%20%

25%

30%35%

40%45%

50%

Sep-71 Sep-75 Sep-79 Sep-83 Sep-87 Sep-91 Sep-95 Sep-99 Sep-03

Repayment burden - % of average w eekly earningsAverage repayment burden post Dec'91

Average repayment burden pre Jun'86

Affordability – repayments as a proportion of average weekly earnings

Household financial liabilities vs assets

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

1988/89 1990/91 1992/93 1994/95 1996/97 1998/99 2000/01 2002/03

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

ratio of liabilities to financial assets (lhs)

ratio to liabilities to financial & dwellingassets (rhs)

29 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Composition of housing portfolio

47 51

1923

5

3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002

$bn

Equity accessloans

Investmenthousing

Owner occupied

Westpac mortgage portfolio

• Housing lending grew 15% (16% including securitised loans)

• Securitised $2.1bn in March 2002

• Portfolio biased to upgrading borrowers not new home owners

• Investment property loans grew more rapidly (19%) over the year, but only represent 29% of portfolio

• Pipeline of applications and approvals points to continuing growth, at least until the first half of the new financial year

• Key statistics

- Average maturity 3.7 yrs

- Average initial loan to value ratio 61%

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-02 Apr-02 Jun-02 Aug-02 Oct-02

$bn

Applications Approvals Drawdowns

Westpac monthly volume of housing lending

30 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

1.04

0.640.38

0.150.230.250.26

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Housing portfolio quality

• 100% mortgage insurance where Loan to value (LVR) ratio > 80%

• Insurance required for loans > $1.3M and LVR > 70%

• Overall delinquencies continue to decline to record lows

• Over 70% of borrowers paying in excess of scheduled repayments

• Long run losses less than 3 basis points

• More rigorous criteria for potential property hot spots, i.e. CBD apartments

20%

Mortgage portfolio $78bn at 30 Sept 2002

Proportion of portfolio with initial LVR > 80%

80%Westpac Lenders

Mortgage Insurance (Capital base $31m)

A+ insurer

65%

Sub underwritten

20%

AA insurer

AAAinsurer

90 day delinquencies%

Retained35%

31 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Stress testing mortgage portfolio

• Detailed stress testing completed to determine expected losses under more severe economic conditions. Tested separately and jointly for:

- up to a 4 percentage point increase in cash rates;

- 20 per cent decline in housing prices; and

- a 200 basis point increase in the unemployment rate

• Behaviour of the investment portfolio closely tracks that of the owner occupied portfolio

Interest rate % pa 6.5% 8.5% 10.5%

Individual effect $m 0.0 2.2 5.2

Price fall % 0% 10% 20%

Individual effect $m 0.0 6.8 20.3

Unemployment rate 6.3% 7.3% 8.3%

Individual effect $m 0.0 1.6 3.3

Total effect $m 1 0.0 15.5 64.3

Total w rite-offs $m2 6.7 22.2 71.0

Total w rite-offs bps2 0.9 3.1 10.1

1. Individual effects do not sum to the total effect because the impact of each of the individual effects is multiplicative in the model

2. Total write-offs on residential mortgage products should all factors coincide

Maximum additional

expected loss if all economic

factors coincided

32 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Offshore exposures

• Offshore exposures primarily supporting customer relationships in Australia and New Zealand

• Total portfolio 5.5% of committed exposures

• Proportion of total portfolio that is sub investment grade, 0.5%

• Investment grade securities portfolio (value included in committed exposures)

- Face value $1,224m

- Fair value $1,122m

- Shortfall $ 102m

• Portfolio of high yield securities also held US$146m (not included in table opposite)

Offshore committed exposures $bn

206

61

29

26

5

85

Asia

236

13

60

0

3

160

Japan

2,8348031,786AAA to AA-

11,9865,5695,975

639273277BB+ to B+

41591250<B+

4,9612,3342,619A+ to A-

3,1372,0681,043BBB+ to BBB-

TotalEuropeUS

33 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Offshore exposures - investment securities

• Yield adjustments not previously realised given “hold to maturity” intention.

• Move to fair value reflects changed intention to actively manage exposure

• $149m charge is a yield adjustment (reflecting credit spreads) not an expected credit loss

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Dec-

98M

ar-9

9Ju

n-99

Sep-

99De

c-99

Mar

-00

Jun-

00Se

p-00

Dec-

00M

ar-0

1Ju

n-01

Sep-

01De

c-01

Mar

-02

Jun-

02Se

p-02

Basis Points

0

5

10

Dec-

98M

ar-9

9Ju

n-99

Sep-

99De

c-99

Mar

-00

Jun-

00Se

p-00

Dec-

00M

ar-0

1Ju

n-01

Sep-

01De

c-01

Mar

-02

Jun-

02

%

S&P sub investment grade credit spread indexMoody’s sub investment grade default rates

History

• Portfolio acquired in 1997 to 1998

• Proposition was that a widely diversified portfolio of BBB and BB rated securities would perform in a predictable manner and generate reliable income to consume US and UK tax losses

• Rise in credit spreads and default rates in 1998 led to decision in 1999 to freeze the portfolio at $US800m and commence a run-down to the current level of $US255m (fair value $US146m)

34 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

27%Effective tax rate (%) (including gross up)

139Fully taxable equivalent gross up

44Other non-deductible items(47)Other non-assessable items

(13)Other items-Sale of AGC

(23)Prior period adjustments18Adjustment for overseas tax rates

571Total income tax expense attributable to operating profit

710Total income tax expense (including gross up)

24Tax losses & timing differences now tax effected(127)Rebatable & exempt dividends

(49)Life insurance and funds management impacts

Add (or deduct) permanent diff expressed on a tax effect basis

INCOME TAX EXPENSE

29%Effective tax rate (%) (excluding life company accounting)

744Prima facie income tax on operating profit before income tax (excluding gross up) based on the company tax rate of 30%

2,481Operating profit before income tax (excluding gross up)

2,620Operating profit before income tax (including gross up)(139)

Ongoing Business$ million

Tax reconciliation on ongoing business

Principally offshore losses not tax effected

Increase in rebatabledividends from

structured transactions

Predominately tax recoveries on policy holder investment earnings ($33m)

Includes revaluations and other non

assessable items

35 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Summary of significant items

è

è

è

è

è

è

Adoption of International Accounting Standard - $160m post tax write-downSuperannuation prepayment

Previously capitalised expenses written off -$95m post taxOutsourcing transition expense

Improving risk management

Change portfolio to mark to market $149m post taxHigh yield investment securities

Written off embedded value ($109m post tax) and recognise goodwill on acquisitionsEmbedded value and goodwill

Integration expenses of $60m post taxIntegration expenses (RAAM/BT)

More conservative treatments

Acquisition and divestment

$754m after tax profitAGC sale

• Recognition of significant items driven by

- Major repositioning of the company

- Strong ongoing earnings

- Improving transparency of earnings and better alignment to analyst conventions

- Adoption of International Accounting Standards due 2005

36 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Significant items - wealth management financial impact

• Move to accrual accounting for wealth management business• Consequences

- Eliminates embedded value in Westpac Financial Services Group (WFSG)- Recreates deferred acquisition costs- Moves RAAM from Life Company to WFSG at 30 September creating goodwill asset of

$330 m- BT goodwill estimate From purchase price $772

Transaction Costs $30Integration Expenses $49

$851

Accounting rules require three approaches: Before tax $m

30

2

9

19

RAAM

142Total

5Uncertain future expenses – expense as incurred

70Expense incurred in target entity – fair value adjustment (increase in goodwill)

67Expenses incurred in acquiring entity – charge when known

BT

37 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Significant items - superannuation prepayment

• Superannuation fund surplus brought to account in 1991 and treated as a prepayment of superannuation expense. Decided to adopt International Accounting Standard (IAS19) given redundancy of current standard (UK standard SSAP24) and Australia's move to IAS in 2005

• Surplus utilised to meet payments to both defined benefit and defined contribution sections of the fund

• Access closed to defined benefit plans in the late 1990’s. Current membership:

- Defined benefit 11,434 - Defined contribution 13,176

• Superannuation expense in 2001 - $20m, in 2002 -$75m. Estimated expense of $92m in 2003

Differences in accounting policies

1,88

7

1,21

4

673

1,84

7

1,32

8

519

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

Value of Assets Value ofLiabilities

Value of Surplus

SSAP 24

IAS 19

Staff Super Fund Value at 1 October 2001 $m

Variations within 10 percent corridor amortised over life of membership

Variations amortised over average life of membership

Changes in value recognised

Actuarially assessed using long-term bond rate (lower rate)

Actuarially assessed using discount rate equivalent to projected funds earningsValue of liabilities

Market Value assessed each yearActuarially assessed on a three year cycleValue of assets

IAS 19SSAP 24

38 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Matched with underlying products in wealth business$86Deferred Acquisition Costs1

Includes debt issue costs, mortgage broker costs etc.$162Other deferred expenditure

Software development costs capitalised and amortisedover three years, but no greater than five. In line with likely IAS standard. None currently over 3 years

$232Software

PolicyBalance at 30.09.2002Nature $m

Significant items - outsourcing transition expenses

• Reviewed all categories of deferred expenditure and decided to change the policy to write-down $136m ($95m after tax) covering all outsourcing transition expenses relating to technology and telecommunications, the mortgage processing centre and other outsourced operations

• Decision improves clarity of contract costs in future operating expenses. If change had not been implemented, previously deferred expenses would otherwise have been charged-off as follows:

- 2003 $37

- 2004 $37

- 2005 $24

• Other categories of deferred expenditure in the accounts are:

1 Relates to Funds Management, excludes life business

39 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Assumptions underlying growth outlook

• Credit growth in the 8% to 10% range

• At least maintain market share momentum across core products

• Expense to income trending lower against re-based costs

• No material change in strong asset quality

• Net retail funds inflow to stabilise vs. market in 2004

• Return to more ‘normal’ financial markets performance

Australian credit growth

-8

-4

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

Jan-90 Jan-92 Jan-94 Jan-96 Jan-98 Jan-00 Jan-02

% ann

personal housing business

forecast

40 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

May-02 Jun-02 Sep-02 Sep-03 Sep-04

Actual re-acquisitionof business book

Initial planned rate ofre-acquisition

• Between Jan 02 and May 02 Westpac re-acquired $1.1bn of AGC business receivables

• Sold $4.1bn to AGC May 02

• $2.2bn re-acquired by end Sept 02

• No capital implications due to business finance indemnity

Forecast

Based on the current run-rate we expect over $4.0bn of the book will be re-acquired by Sept 03, ahead of our planned schedule

Growth outlook - re-acquisition of AGC business portfolio

41 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Growth outlook – expense analysis

• Efficiency momentum expected to be maintained in 2003

• Higher cost to income base of 53.6% following AGC sale and wealth management acquisitions, including BT

• Banking cost to income ratio1 50% (down from 52% in 2001)

• Given reduction in cost base in 2002, headline cost growth expected to be marginally higher in 2003 at around 4%

• Increase driven by:

- Higher NZ dollar- Restructuring expenses associated with

NZ performance improvement program- Increase in superannuation expenses- Variable compensation in institutional

banking returning to normal

• Offsetting cost increases is the pipeline ofinitiatives already in place

92

5

4

832002

127119112Outsourcing

777777Organisational simplification

857662Other programs

289

2005

272

2004

251Annual savings

2003Initiative $m

Cost to income ratio

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

1H99

2H99

1H00

2H00

1H01

2H01

1H02

2H02

2002

FY*

AGC Impact

%

Pipeline of efficiency initiatives

* 2002FY represents the full year ratio adjusted for BT and Hastings acquisitions.

1. The Banking cost to income ratio includes Westpac’s Australian Business and Consumer banking, Institutional banking and New Zealand and Pacific Island banking operations.

42 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Small and medium enterprise (SME) portfolio growth

• Small and medium businesses are in excellent shape, with strong cash reserves and modest gearing

• In 2003, expected pick-up in business lending driven by capacity constraints from solid consumer demand

• Business intention surveys expect increased investment in 2002/03, a portion of which is expected to be funded from borrowings

• Credit to businesses has shown recent improvement with growth expected to rise from 4% to between 6% to 8% in 2003

• Westpac well positioned in sector having improved its position as the preferred business bank

19

12

19

1314

16 16

13

02468

101214161820

NAB WBC CBA ANZ

1999 2001

Small business bank chosen if switching tomorrow

Source: Greenwich Associates

Capital expenditure and forward estimates

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03

% %

mining manufacturing other ex trans transport

3rd est for 2002/03

%

43 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

• Total portfolio exposure $33bn*

• In growing the portfolio, Westpac has maintained its credit standards, with the overall quality of the book improving

• Most growth expected from existing customers.

• Business acquired from other financial institutions subject to rigorous review and higher approval authorities

• No signs of any systemic credit problems

Business banking* portfolio quality

Impaired assets to total committed exposure%

1.91

1.28

0.63

1.471.53

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

90 day delinquencies

2.07

0.270.37

1.80

1.01

0.51

0.71

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

* Australian Business Banking portfolio

%

44 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Financial markets earnings

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

$m

Institutional banking performance

• Disappointing performance from institutional banking with profit falling 25%

• Results impacted by:

- Write down and charges against investment securities portfolio

- Bad debts associated with a small number of high profile defaults

- Poor financial markets trading

• Trading performance consistent with expected volatility

• Detailed performance enhancement program now commenced

• Expect financial markets earnings to return to more ‘normal’ levels in 2003

Outlook

November/December 2002

46 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Priorities for 2003

• Maintain momentum in ongoing businesses

- Complete initiatives arising from NZ program review

- Implement program reviews of Australian Banking and Institutional Banking

- Complete end-to-end re-engineering of lending processes

• Deliver value from new acquisitions

- Complete wealth management integration

- Capture value across 7.5m customer base using wrap and corporate super

• The customer promise

- Transform customer service levels

47 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Economic environment

• Australian economy in good shape

• GDP growth in 3.0% to 3.5% range

• Housing to slow; business investment and exports up

• Unemployment falling into the 6% to 6.5% range

• Underlying inflation back in 2% - 3% range

• Rise in official rates not expected near term

2.9%2.2%2.8%CPI

6.5%

3.3%

2002/03f

Unemployment rate

GDP

2003/04f2001/02

6.4%6.7%

3.8%3.8%

Key economic indicators

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

Dec-86 Jun-89 Dec-91 Jun-94 Dec-96 Jun-99 Dec-01

% ann

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8% ann

GDP Private final demand

48 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Where are the risks?

Risk Probability of occurrence

• Australian economy stalls Low

• Irrational competition Low

• New entrants Low

• Re-regulation Medium / low

• Acquisition risk Very low

• New wave of corporate collapses Low

49 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Regulatory issues

• Credit card reform

- Reforms released by Reserve Bank of Australia 27 Aug 02

- Affects interchange fees, ends restrictions on cost recovery by merchants and removes restrictions on new entrants

- Interchange reforms apply from October 03

- Assuming average reduction of 40 bps in interchange fees from 2004

• EFTPOS reform

- RBA currently reviewing submissions

- Westpac expected to be a net beneficiary

• Expected earnings impact

- Full year impact approximately $30-40m p.a (post tax) from 2004

50 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

• Core businesses continuing to deliver

• Transformed the business underpinning medium term growth trajectory

• Lower risk and higher quality earnings

2003Earnings Expectations

7% – 9%Cash EPS expectations

(2%)Dilution of recent transactions

9%-11%Core business EPS growth

Summary and earnings expectations

Supplementary Information

November/December 2002

52 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

* % of Total Exposure - 30 September 2002

19% 18% 19% 20%

14% 12% 9%

14%13% 13% 13%

17% 18% 19% 17%

9%

1%1.3%1.5%1.2%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

1H 01 FY 01 1H 02 FY 02AAA to AA- A+ to A- BBB+ to BBB- BB+ to B+ <B+

Composition of portfolio - % of total committed facilities

• Other consumer includes credit cards, personal lending and margin lending

• Mortgages represent 36% of total commitments and 55% of funded lending

• 70% business / corporate portfolio exceeding investment grade

66% 63% 61% 60%

30% 32% 34% 36%

4%5%5%4%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1H 01 FY 01 1H 02 FY 02

Business / Institutional Consumer Mortgages Other Consumer

Portfolio by customer segment*

Corporate/Business portfolio*

53 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

% Group Total Committed Exposure

Industry exposure – 1996 to 2002

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

2002

1996

PropertySubstantial non-bank financiers

GovernmentDurable products manufacturing

Other agriculture & servicesRetailing

Electricity, gas & waterGrain, sheep & poultry

Business technical servicesHotels & restaurants

Petroleum refining & chemicalsForestry, printing & paper products

Non residential constructionMetal mining & services

WholesalingInsurance

Hospitals & health servicesTransport, equipment & services

Transport & storageRecreation services

Food manufactureTelecommunications

Motor vehicle tradeResidential construction

Other manufacturing

54 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

1. As at 30 September 2002

2. Includes mortgages for housing, investment property loans, equity access loans and margin lending.

3. Credit cards and personal loans.

Total exposure by booking office1

Remaining offshore sub investment grade exposures

represents 0.5% of TCE.

7,41900009376,482Unsecured consumer3

217,3902362065,5705,97434,025171,380

80,187000012,35267,835Secured consumer2

2,2561361912505181,324<B+

37,26060292732776,08030,542BB+ to B+

27,2930262,0681,0434,77219,385BBB+ to BBB-

20,643352,3342,6192,70412,978A+ to A-

42,331160858031,7866,66332,833AAA to AA-

GroupJapanAsia ex JapanEuropeAmericasNZ /

PacificAustralia

55 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

* Exposure $m - September 2002.0 200 400 600 800 1,000

A

BBB+

A

A-

A

A

A

A

AA-

AAA

Top 10 exposures to corporations and NBFIs

S&P rating or equivalent

Single name exposure concentrations

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

1998 2000 2002

Top 10 exposures as a % of total committed exposure

56 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Telco and energy exposures

157

1,359

0200400600800

1,0001,2001,4001,600

1,516

AAA to BBB+

BBB to BBB-

BB+ to BB-

>BB-

$m

9%6%

65%

20%

Australia (100%Investment grade)

Asia (100%Investment grade)

Europe (54%Investment Grade)

Nth America (0%Investment grade)

34080

1,060

1,980

0500

1,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,000

3,460

AAA to BBB+

BBB to BBB-

BB+ to BB

BB-

>BB-

$m

73%

4%

23% Australia (91%Investment grade)

Asia (53%Investment grade)

Nth America (83%Investment grade)

Global energy portfolio

Telco exposure

4.09.65.5ANZ2.010.92.7NAB0.73.51.5WBC

Total non investment grade

EnergyTelco$bnExposure to telco and energy sectors*

*Source: Merrill Lynch

57 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Institutional banking portfolio quality

Impaired assets to total WIB committed exposure

%

0.14

0.530.63

0.290.37

0.25

0.34

0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.7

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

• Increase in impaired assets since 2000 due to small number of high profile defaults

• Decline in impaired assets in 2002 related to write-down in two major impaired assets of $95m

Probability of default

0.13

0.250.29

0.15

0.29

0.19

0.21

0.00.10.10.20.20.30.30.4

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

%

58 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Consumer unsecured portfolio

• Strong growth in portfolio led to increase in bad debts

• Planned pick-up in delinquencies in line with credit scoring adjustments

• Modest increase in bad debts in 2002

90 day delinquencies

1.07

1.98

0.96 1.140.9

0.630.82

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Including AGC Excluding AGC

Bad debt charge as a per cent of outstandings

207

250270

290

231

186

100

150

200

250

300

2000 2001 2002Including AGC Excluding AGC

Basis point

%

59 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Impaired assets – reconciliation of balance

696

902

461

12151427

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

GrossImpairedSept 2001

NewImpaired

AGC Sale Written off Other GrossImpairedSept 2002

‘Other’ includes loans returning to performing, and security realised

60 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

bps

Bad debts within long-run averages

Total bad & doubtful debt charge to average loans and acceptances

Expected long-run average 25-35 bps

61 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Total provisions to total impaired assets

%

62

88

137

183 188

233249

177

211

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

%

General provision to non-housing performing loans & acceptances

2.52.4

2.22.0

1.8 1.8 1.7

0

1

2

3

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Provisioning coverage

62 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Analysis of margin dynamics

* Full year impact of 2002 items

Note: Bill acceptances equal average increase in interest bearing assets

2.80153,1244,2853.11Group

0.6523,8251541.03Other overseas

3.2626,3728613.28New Zealand

2.75118,7663,2703.08Australia reported

-9,338--Bill acceptances

2.99109,4283,2703.08Australia (excl bills)

MarginAverage Balance $m

Net Interest Income $mMargin

2002

3.032.993.053.11Normalised margin

2001

2.802.702.903.11Reported margin

0.05

0.18

2002

0.09

0.20

H2 2002

-

0.15

H1 2002

-

-

2001

0.16Impact of AGC sale

0.20Impact of bill acceptance funding

2003*

63 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

Sep

-00

Dec-00

Mar-01

Jun

-01

Sep

-01

Dec-01

Mar-02

Jun

-02

Sep

-02

Australia New Zealand

On-line Banking

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

Sep

-00

Dec-00

Mar-01

Jun

-01

Sep

-01

Dec-01

Mar-02

Jun

-02

Sep

-02On-line Broking - Australia

1,680,000*# 1 in online usage 119,000*

* 30 September 2002

Online growth

64 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Executive compensation

• Retained and reshaped long-term incentives

- All long-term incentives hurdled and eligibility reduced

- Hurdles tightened (no vesting at <50th percentile)

- Moving from 100% options to - 50% performance options, 50% performance share rights

• Cost of equity based compensation in 2002 $48m (pre tax)

• Will expense options when Australian accounting standard in place (expensed in US GAAP in 2002)

65 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Wealth management business

Large282(11)1Other – one-off items (Australia)

61%3353Total life insurance

11%97108Total funds management

91%(12)(23)Other – business as usual (Australia)

89%917Life insurance and risk (New Zealand)

50%2436Life insurance and risk (Australia)

(13%)146127Total wealth management

17%118138Total before one-off items

14%92105Funds management (Australia)

(40%)53Funds management (New Zealand)

% Change20012002NPAT $ million

1 2002 write-down of Hartleys ($16m) and sale of properties Investa $5m2 2001 sale property trust $28m

66 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

5.8

6.4 6.5

5.3

5.86.0

4.8

5.7 5.7*

6.16.3

4.9

6.86.7

3.5

4.5

5.5

6.5

7.5

TOE / RAA Tier 1 ratio ACE Ratio

1H01 2H01 1H02 2H02 After BT

%

Capital levels comfortable

* Prior to change in APRA deductions

67 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

1,434Closing balance

37Net new provisions

1,397Sub total

(95)Write-off of two major impaired assets

(165)Sold with AGC

1,657Opening balance

Reconciliation of provisioning

Reconciliation of provisioning

Provisioning Balance Movements from 31 March 2002

68 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Full year earnings reconciliation

1 Includes 8 months of AGC profit

$mReported

results

Individually significant

items

Underlying Business

AGC1Ongoing business

Reported results

Accounting change

Underlying Business

AGCOngoing business

Interest income(incl.gross up) 9,359 - 9,359 713 8,646 10,407 - 10,407 1,105 9,302 Interest expense (5,074) - (5,074) (397) (4,677) (6,207) - (6,207) (615) (5,592)Net interest income (incl. gross up) 4,285 - 4,285 316 3,969 4,200 - 4,200 490 3,710 Total non-interest income 2,978 460 2,518 49 2,469 2,537 63 2,474 59 2,415 Net operating income(incl. gross up) 7,263 460 6,803 365 6,438 6,737 63 6,674 549 6,125 Operating expenses - - Salaries and other staff expenses (1,829) (221) (1,608) (39) (1,569) (1,744) - (1,744) (59) (1,685) Equipment and occupancy (589) - (589) (18) (571) (648) - (648) (33) (615) Other expenses (1,477) (222) (1,255) (37) (1,218) (1,080) - (1,080) (51) (1,029)Total operating expenses (excl amortisation of goodwill)

(3,895) (443) (3,452) (94) (3,358) (3,472) - (3,472) (143) (3,329)

Core earnings 0 271 -271 3,265 3,265 406 2,859 Amortisation of goodwill (100) - (100) - (100) (98) - (98) - (98)Operating profit before bad & doubtful debts (incl gross up)

3,268 17 3,251 271 2,980 3,167 63 3,104 406 2,698

Bad and doubtful debts (461) - (461) (101) (360) (433) - (433) (158) (275)Profit from ordinary activities before income tax (incl. gross up)

2,807 17 2790 170 2620 2,734 63 2,671 248 2,423

Fully tax equivalent gross up (139) (139) - (139) (149) - (149) - (149)Profit before income tax 2,668 17 2,651 170 2,481 2,585 63 2,522 248 2,274 Income tax expense (471) 164 (635) (64) (571) (677) (14) (663) (96) (567)Net profit attributable to outside equity interests

(5) - (5) - (5) (5) - (5) - (5)

Net profit attributable to equity holders

2,192 181 2,011 106 1,905 1,903 49 1,854 152 1,702

Net profit attributable to equity 2,192 181 2,011 106 1,905 1,903 49 1,854 152 1,702 Goodwill 100 - 100 - 100 98 - 98 - 98 Distributions on other equity instruments

(48) - (48) - (48) (51) - (51) - (51)

Cash earnings 2,244 181 2,063 106 1,957 1,950 49 1,901 152 1,749

Cash earnings (cents) per ordinary share

123.8 113.9 108.0 108.3 105.6 97.1

twelve months to: twelve months to:30 Sept. 2002 30 Sept. 2001

69 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Half-on-half earnings reconciliation

$mReported

results

Individually significant

items

Underlying business

AGCOngoing

businessReported

resultsAccounting

changeUnderlying

businessAGC

Ongoing business

Interest income (incl. gross up) 4,688 - 4,688 178 4,510 4,671 - 4,671 535 4,136Interest expense (2,563) - (2,563) (105) (2,458) (2,511) - (2,511) (292) (2,219)Net interest income (incl. gross up) 2,125 - 2,125 73 2,052 2,160 - 2,160 243 1,917Total non-interest income 1,616 400 1,216 12 1,204 1,362 60 1,302 37 1,265Net operating income (incl. gross up) 3,741 400 3,341 85 3,256 3,522 60 3,462 280 3,182Operating expenses

Salaries and other staff expenses (1,006) (221) (785) (10) (775) (823) - (823) (29) (794)Equipment and occupancy expenses (298) - (298) (5) (293) (291) - (291) (13) (278)Other expenses (852) (222) (630) (10) (620) (625) - (625) (27) (598)

Operating expenses (excl goodw ill) (2,156) (443) (1,713) (25) (1,688) (1,739) - (1,739) (69) (1,670)Amortisation of goodw ill (51) - (51) - (51) (49) - (49) 0 (49)Operating profit before bad debts 1,534 (43) 1,577 60 1,517 1,734 60 1,674 211 1,463Bad and doubtful debts (190) - (190) (31) (159) (271) - (271) (70) (201)

Profit from ordinary activities before income tax (incl. gross up)

1,344 (43) 1,387 29 1,358 1,463 60 1,403 141 1,262

Fully tax equivalent gross up (72) - (72) - (72) (67) 0 (67) - (67)Profit before income tax 1,272 (43) 1,315 29 1,286 1,396 60 1,336 141 1,195Income tax expense (95) 178 (273) (16) (257) (376) (14) (362) (48) (314)Net profit attributable to outside equity (3) - (3) - (3) (2) - (2) - (2)Net profit 1,174 135 1,039 13 1,026 1,018 46 972 93 879Net profit attributable to equity holders 1,174 135 1,039 13 1,026 1,018 46 972 93 879Goodw ill 51 - 51 - 51 49 - 49 - 49Distributions on other equity (23) - (23) - (23) (25) - (25) - (25)Cash earnings 1,202 1,067 13 1,054 1,042 996 93 903Cash earnings (cents) per share 66 59 58 58 55 50

31 March 200230 Sept. 2002

70 Investor Discussion Pack – Full Year 2002

Disclaimer

The material contained in this presentation is intended to be general background information on Westpac Banking Corporation and its activities as at 12 November 2002.

The information is supplied in summary form and is therefore not necessarily complete. Also, it is not intended that it be relied upon as advice to investors or potential investors, who should consider seeking independent professional advice depending upon their specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs.