intraoral prosthetics

36
Intra-Oral Prosthetics Taylor Harris & Brittany Janowski

Upload: brittanyjanowski

Post on 20-Nov-2014

2.016 views

Category:

Documents


8 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Intraoral Prosthetics

Intra-Oral Prosthetics

Taylor Harris

&

Brittany Janowski

Page 2: Intraoral Prosthetics

What are intra-oral prosthetics?

• Artificial substitutes for missing, altered, or deformed oral structures

• Placed in vocal tract

• Primarily used to improve speech & swallowing

Page 3: Intraoral Prosthetics

Population

• Head & Neck Cancer

• Cleft palate

• Progressive neurologic diseases

• Traumatic injuries

Page 4: Intraoral Prosthetics

Multidisciplinary Team

• Maxillofacial prosthodontist *• Speech-Language Pathologist• Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeons• Plastic Surgeons• Head & Neck Surgeons• ENT doctors• Occupational therapist• Physiotherapists• Oncologists• Physical Therapists

Page 5: Intraoral Prosthetics

Role & Responsibilities of the SLP

• Determine specific needs• Actively participate in design of

appliance• Assess effectiveness• Provide direction for modifications

• i.e. size, shape• Provide follow-up treatment & monitor

• Swallowing, speech, voice, resonance

• Teach patient about care & cleaning

Page 6: Intraoral Prosthetics

Types

Page 7: Intraoral Prosthetics

Palatal Lift• Designed to augment or replace

hard and soft palate tissue defects

• Aids in restoration of soft palate functions

• Improves velopharyngeal closure

• Commonly used for dysarthria; velopharyngeal incompetence

Page 8: Intraoral Prosthetics
Page 9: Intraoral Prosthetics

Palatal Obturator

• Closes or occludes opening caused by cleft or fistula

• Used to facilitate separation of oral & nasal cavities for speech, feeding, & swallowing• hypernasality• suckling ability in babies

• Not to be confused with palatal lift

Page 10: Intraoral Prosthetics
Page 11: Intraoral Prosthetics

The Latham Device

Page 12: Intraoral Prosthetics

Nasoalveolar Obturator

Page 13: Intraoral Prosthetics

Obturator Categories

• Modification Obturator Short term

• Interim Obturator Post surgery

• Definitive Obturator Long term

Page 14: Intraoral Prosthetics

Speech Bulb

• Occludes nasopharynx when the velum is short (velopharygeal indufficiency)

• Aids in velopharyngeal closure

• Contains pharyngeal section, goes behind soft palate

• Can be combined with an obturator

Page 15: Intraoral Prosthetics
Page 16: Intraoral Prosthetics

Tongue Prosthetic

• Sometimes used following total glossectomy

• Steel clasps attach to lower teeth

• Facilitates speech & swallowing

Page 17: Intraoral Prosthetics

Tongue for Speech

Page 18: Intraoral Prosthetics

Limitations of Prosthetic Devices

• Require insertion and removal• Have to redo periodically due to

growth• Can be lost or damaged• May be very uncomfortable • Compliance is often poor• Don’t permanently correct the

problem• Many centers use only if surgery is

not possible

Page 19: Intraoral Prosthetics

Assessment

• Prosthetic assessment is provided to:• evaluate, select, and/or dispense a

prosthetic device to improve functional communication

• including associated activities and participation

Page 20: Intraoral Prosthetics

Who Can Assess

• Prosthetic assessments are conducted by appropriately credentialed and trained SLPs

• SLPs perform assessments as members of collaborative teams that include • Individual• family/caregivers• Educators• medical personnel

Page 21: Intraoral Prosthetics

Why Assess?

To identify:• underlying strengths and weaknesses

related to the use of prosthetic as it affects communication and swallowing

• effects of prosthetic on activities such as capacity and performance in everyday communication and participation

• factors that serve as barriers or facilitators for successful communication/swallowing

Page 22: Intraoral Prosthetics

What Process Includes

• Review of status • Case history info • Standardized and/or

nonstandardized methods• Follow-up services• Cost considerations & safety

and health implications• Dispensing practices

Page 23: Intraoral Prosthetics

Setting of Assessment

• Clinical, educational or other natural environment setting conducive to eliciting a representative sample of the client's communication using a prosthetic device.

• Identifying the influence of related factors on functioning (activity and participation) requires assessment data from multiple settings.

Page 24: Intraoral Prosthetics

Documentation of Assessment

• Results, interpretation, prognosis, and recommendations.

• Provide a rationale for the preferred prosthetic; a description of device; procedures involved in the assessment of the device; counseling provided to the patient; and the patient‘s response.

Page 25: Intraoral Prosthetics

Prosthetic Intervention

Intervention services are conducted to assist

individuals to understand, use, adjust, and restore their

customized prosthetic device.

Page 26: Intraoral Prosthetics

Who Provides Intervention Services?

• conducted by appropriately credentialed and trained SLPs, possibly supported by SLP assistants under appropriate supervision.

• SLPs as members of interdisciplinary teams

Page 27: Intraoral Prosthetics

Expected Outcomes of Treatment

• Strengths & weaknesses related to communication /swallowing

• Acquire new skills and strategies using the device

• Aid for successful communication/swallowing• Provide appropriate accommodations and

train how to use them• Improve abilities, functioning, participation,

and contextual facilitators• May result in recommendations for

reassessment or follow-up, or referral for other services

Page 28: Intraoral Prosthetics

Goal(s) Associated With Prosthetics

• Painless, efficient swallowing of secretions• Unrestricted head movement• Elimination or reduction of nasal emission• Decrease respiratory effort/long breath

groups• Increased subglottal pressures; increased

loudness• Improved articulatory precision• improved speech intelligibility• normalized nasality

Page 29: Intraoral Prosthetics

Clinical Process

Depending on assessment results, intervention addresses the following:

• Provide info, course of intervention and duration, effective communication/swallowing

• Education and maintenance, info about safety and instrument warranty

• How repair, maintain, and modify• Intervention accomplishes objectives• Meets the abilities, needs, and wants of

patient and who they communicates with, considering the environment it will be used

Page 30: Intraoral Prosthetics

Setting of Treatment

• clinical or educational settings

• other natural environments that are selected on the basis of intervention goals and in consideration for the social, academic, and/or vocational activities that are relevant to the individual.

Page 31: Intraoral Prosthetics

sEMG

• As muscles contract, microvolt level electrical signals are created within the muscle that may be measured from the surface of the body. A procedure that measures muscle activity from the skin is referred to as surface electromyography (SEMG).

Page 32: Intraoral Prosthetics

One Researcher’s Results

• ‘Eighty-seven percent (39/45) of all patients increased their functional oral intake of food/liquid including 92% of stroke patients and 80% of head/neck cancer patients.’

Page 33: Intraoral Prosthetics

Cultural/Ethical Considerations

It is important to be culturally sensitive in

assessment and treatment of

individuals needing dysphagia

management.

Page 34: Intraoral Prosthetics

Things to Consider about Diversity

• Foods to use in dysphagia assessment and treatment

• Who is it appropriate to talk with about therapy?

• Choosing assessments that are culturally considerate

Page 35: Intraoral Prosthetics

Counseling

• Counseling is important for individuals pre and post surgery

• Being a part of society and communicating with others is something humans need, and the need for prosthetics can alter this from happening.

Page 36: Intraoral Prosthetics

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2001). Roles of Speech-Language Pathologists in Swallowing and Feeding Disorders: Technical Report [Technical Report]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy. doi:10.1044/policy.TR2001-00150

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Preferred Practice Patterns for the Profession of Speech-Language Pathology [Preferred Practice Patterns]. Available from www.asha.org/policy

.• Crary, M. A., Carnaby, G. D., Groher, M. E., & Helseth, E. (2004). Functional benefits of dysphagia therapy

using adjunctive sEMG biofeedback [Abstract]. Dysphagia, 19, 160-164.doi:10.1007/s00455-004- 0003-8

• Grames, L.M., Jones, D.L., Kummer, A.W., Kurnell, M.P., Ruscello, D. (2006). Response to “Velopharyngeal dysfunction:Speech characteristics, variable etiologies, evaluation techniques, and differential

treatments” by Dworkin, Marunick, & Krouse. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in

Schools. 36, 236-238. • Light. J. (1995). A review of oral and oropharyngeal prosthesis to faciliatate speech and swallowing. American

Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 15-21.• Likes, C. P., McCarthy, E. S., Zwilling, C., Dingman, C. A coordinated, multidisciplinary approach to caring for

the patient with head and neck cancer [PPT document]. Retrieved from South Carolina Speech Language Hearing Association Web site: http://www.scsha.com/handouts/session42.pdf