international civil aviation organization pbn implementation in brasil flight inspection seminar

International Civil Aviation Organization

PBN Implementation in Brasil

Flight Inspection Seminar

São Jose dos Campos – Brasil

21 – 23 november 2011

Ten Cel CTA Júlio Cesar de Souza Pereira

Maj Eng Alessander de Andrade Santoro

(DECEA)

Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures

Objective

Present Brazilian experience in

Performance Based Navigation and Flight Inspection.


Contents

Performance Based Navigation

Flight Inspection


• Area navigation based on performance requirements (accuracy, integrity, continuity, availability and functionality) for aircraft operating along an ATS route, on an instrument approach procedure or in a designated airspace.

• RNAV Operations does not include the requirement for performance monitoring and alerting

• RNAV Operations includes the requirement for performance monitoring and alerting

PBN

RNAV 1RNAV 1

1 Nautical Mile 95% of time


Track Centerline

RNP 1RNP 1



Track Centerline

ALERT TO PILOT

Navigation Specification

Phase of flight

EnrouteOceanicRemote

EnrouteContinental

ARR Approach DEP(SID)Initial Interm. Final Missed

Approach

RNAV-10 (RNP-10)

10 - - - - - - -

RNAV-5 - 5 5 - - - - -

RNAV-2 - 2 2 - - - - 2

RNAV-1 - - 1 1 1 - 1 1

RNP-4 4 - - - - - -

RNP-1 / Básico

- - 1 1 1 - 1 1

RNP APCH - - - 1 1 0,3 1 -

RNP AR APCH

- - - 1 – 0,1 1 – 0,1 0,3 – 0,1 1 – 0,1 -

Navigation Specifications

Enroute Implementation

PBN (RNAV-5)

PBN Regional Enroute Implementation

Implementation Phases :

• Phase 1: Version 1 SAM ATS Route Network – implemented on 10/03/2011

• Phase 2: RNAV-5 Implementation – 20/10/2011• Phase 3 – Version 2 SAM ATS Route Network –

(October 2013)

Brazilian RNAV-5 Route Network Project

(Anticipation of SAM Version 2) Limited to the ATS Routes Network attending the main Brazilian TMA – 08 March 2012 (RNAV-5):

• Routes to be implemented - 27 • Routes to be canceled – 18• Routes to be partially canceled – 10 • Routes to be realigned – 56

BR

SP

RJ

BH

VT

CONVENTIONAL Route Network (2011)

BR

SP

RJ

BH

VT

RNAV 5 Route NetworkMarch 2012

TMA Implementation

PBN (RNAV-1 / RNP APCH / RNP APCH AR)

Main Regulations Main Regulations

Instruction 100-23 (Procedure Designer Rating)

Instruction 100-24 (Air Navigation Procedures Design)

Circular 100-54 (Air Navigation Procedures Design

Standardization).

Manual 53-3 (Aeronautical Charts).

Courses and TrainingCourses and Training

PANS-OPS General Criteria “Conventional” Air Navigation Procedures ILS, LLZ and PAR Approach Procedures RNAV/RNP Air Navigation Procedures. APV BARO/VNAV Procedures. Helicopters Procedures RNP AR APCH Procedures PANS-OPS Recurrent Training PANS-OPS Update Training

Procedure Designer Rating Procedure Designer Rating

Present Situation

37 Rated Procedures Designers

16 Rated APV/Baro-VNAV

8 Rated RNP AR APCH

TMA PBN Project

Main Activities

1 Airspace Concept Development

2 Performance Evaluation Plan

3 Safety Assessment

4 Collaborative Decision Making Process

5 ATC Tools

6 Rules and Procedures

7 Air Navigation Procedures Publication

8 Training

9 Aircraft and Operators Approval

10 Pos-implementation Monitoring

11 Documentation

Implementation Dates

• TMA BR and RF – Apr 2010 (implemented)

• TMA RJ and SP – Apr 2013 (on going)

• TMA BH and SV – Mar 2014

• TMA CT and PA – Jun 2015

Strategic ObjectivesStrategic Objectives

1. Safety

2. Capacity

3. Efficiency

4. Environment Protection

5. Access

Main Traffic Flows – São Paulo TMA

–

TMA-SP 2010

KPKP

GRGR

SPSP

CT – 6,4%

AMER. S. “S” 7,2%

PA – 5,8%

NF – 1,5%

FL – 3,5%

JV – 1,0 %

CX – 0,3 %

25,5%

DN – 0,5 %

AU – 0,3%

AMER. S

. “N” 0

,8%

CG – 1,8%

SR – 1,0 %

AE – 0,6 %

ML –

0,4 %

CY –1,2 %

6,6%AFRICA – 0,7%

VT – 2,0%G

L – 5,4%RJ – 10,9%JF – 0,3%

19,3%

EUROPA – 2,7%

NT – 1,2% PS – 0,7%

FZ – 2,0% MO – 1,0%

CF – 5,9% IL – 0,3%

AR – 0,2% JP – 0,3%

SV – 4,9% TC – 0,1%

RF – 2,8% IP – 0,2%

BH – 1,0%

23,3%

USA – 2,7%EG – 1,4%GO – 2,1%UL – 1,2%RP – 1,5%BR – 7,7 %BE – 0,5 %SL – 0,3 %

17,4%

LO – 0,8%

FI – 0,6%

MG

– 0,5%

1,9%

–

TMA-SP 2015

KPKP

GRGR

SPSP

CT – 5,9%

AMER. S. “S” 5,6%

PA – 5,8%

NF – 1,6%

FL – 3,1%

JV – 0,8 %

CX – 0,3 %

23,1%

DN – 0,5 %

AU – 0,3%

AMER. S

. “N” 0

,7%

CG – 1,7%

SR – 1,0 %

AE – 0,6 %

ML –

0,4 %

CY – 1,0 %

6,2%AFRICA – 0,7%

VT – 2,1%G

L – 3,8%RJ – 11,3%JF – 0,2%

18,1%

EUROPA – 2,1%

NT – 1,5% PS – 0,6%

FZ – 2,4% MO – 1,0%

CF – 7,2% IL – 0,2%

AR – 0,2% JP – 0,3%

SV – 6,4% TC – 0,1%

RF – 3,6% IP – 0,2%

BH – 1,1%

26,9%

USA – 2,1%EG – 1,0%GO – 1,8%UL – 1,5%RP – 1,5%BR – 9,2 %BE – 0,5 %SL – 0,3 %

18,0%

LO – 0,7%

FI – 0,5%

MG

– 0,5%

1,7%

LEGENDA

SBSP DEPSBSP ARRSBGR DEOSBGR ARRSBKP DEPSBKP ARR

KPKP

GRGR

SPSP

Proposed TMA

KPKP

GRGR

SPSP

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

T7

T8

T9

SBSP DEPSBSP ARRSBGR DEOSBGR ARRSBKP DEPSBKP ARR

Approach and Departure Procedures Approach and Departure Procedures ImplementationImplementation

PBN Approach and Departures Implementation for about 140 Public Airport, taking into consideration the A37-11 Resolution Milestones

640 new charts were developed Publication Schedule was established in accordance with DECEA

and users need

Present Situation

88 LNAV only RNAV (GNSS) Procedures 63 LNAV/VNAV RNAV (GNSS) Procedures 125 RNAV SID

Santos Dumont Airport Santos Dumont Airport RNP APCH AR ProcedureRNP APCH AR Procedure


RNAV GNSS

MANINV (Manual Brasileiro de Inspeção em Voo – Brazilian Flight Inspection Manual) – section 214


RNAV GNSS

Procedures must be:

Safe;

Easy to understand;

Minimum pilot workload / flyability.

Tolerances

Course error to the next WAYPOINT = ± 1°

Distance error to the ext WAYPOINT = ± 0.1 NM

Obstacle Clearance


RNAV GNSS

RAIM (Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring)

Adequate horizontal precision;

Electromagnetic interference;

Masking angles due to obstacles;

Note: In the occurrence of RAIM alarm during the flight, the inspection must be interrupted in order to evaluate the possible

causes.


RNAV GNSS

Other causes of interruption

HDOP above 4.0

VDOP above 4.0

Number of tracked satellites bellow 5

HFOM above 22m

Strange results in the receiver


RNAV DME/DME

CIRINV 121-16 (17 NOV 2009) – Flight Inspection Circular

DME / DME

• Multilateration

• 30° < angle < 150°

• FMS (data base)

Critical DME

DME considered as indispensable to the execution of the procedure, as established by the procedure designer.


RNAV DME/DME

All segments requiring altitude variation must be inspected using minimum climbing gradients and minimum altitudes as specified in the procedure;

Aircraft must be equiped with 02 (two) FMS.

Flight inspection must be interrupted in case of a critical DME is out of operation

Two fases: Coverage and accuracy verification Procedure verification


RNAV DME/DME

COVERAGE AND ACCURACY VERIFICATION

Coverage of critical DME must be evaluated, according to the required profile (SID/STAR) to identify coverage outages in minimal flight altitudes.

Navigation during flight will be based on 1P´s FMS, which must be enabled to all sensors available.

On 2P´s FMS, all sensor, except DME and Inertial, must be disabled.

During the flight, Flight Inspector must identify the position every time ANP (Actual Navigation Performance), displayed in 2P´s FMS, is greater than the Required Navigation Performance to the leg of the procedure.


RNAV DME/DME

COVERAGE AND ACCURACY VERIFICATION (cont.)

During comissioning flights, each critical DME of the procedure must have its coverage and signal level verified by the Flight Inspection System.

During periodic inspections, signal level may be verified in “spot check”, prioritizing critical DME.


RNAV DME/DME

PROCEDURE VERIFICATION

The objective in this phase is to verify the procedure in the same configuration the air space users will use it.

Navigation will be based on 1P´s FMS, with all sensors disabled, except DME and INERTIAL.

All sensor in 2P´s FMS must be enabled.

QUESTIONS?

international civil aviation organization pbn implementation in brasil flight inspection seminar

Documents

tma implementation pbn

navigation area navigation

performance based navigation

brazilian rnav

departures implementation

posimplementation monitoring

ats routes network

sam ats route network