interlanguage ellis 2003, chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

15
By: Fajar Cita Wibowo Sukmawan Bimo Charisma Septika / 2201410033 Delia Prestiana Putri / 2201410040

Upload: sirius

Post on 22-Jan-2016

89 views

Category:

Documents


14 download

DESCRIPTION

Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35). By: Fajar Cita Wibowo Sukmawan Bimo Charisma Septika / 2201410033 Delia Prestiana Putri / 2201410040. Definition of Interlanguage. The system of L2 knowledge of learner language reflects a mental system of L2 knowledge. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

By:Fajar Cita WibowoSukmawan Bimo

Charisma Septika / 2201410033Delia Prestiana Putri /

2201410040

Page 2: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

The system of L2 knowledge of learner

language reflects a mental system of L2 knowledge.

Page 3: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

The dominant psychological theory of the 1950s and 1960s was behaviourist learning theory.

In this theory, it involves habit formation.

Page 4: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

A habit is a stimulus-response connection. Learners imitated models of correct

language (i.e. stimuli) and received positive reinforcement if they were correct and negative reinforcement if they were incorrect. For example, learners might hear the sentence “Give me a pencil”, use it themselves, and thereby be rewarded by achieving their communicative goal ( i.e. by being given a pencil when they wanted one).

Page 5: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

• In 1960s and 1970s a mentalist theory of L1 acquisition emerged. According to this theory:

1. Only human beings are capable of learning language.

2. The human mind is equipped with a faculty for learning language, referred to as a Language Acquisition Device.

3. This faculty is the primary determinant of language acquisition.

4. Input is needed, but only to ‘trigger’ the operation of LAD.

Page 6: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

• It was coined by the American linguist, Larry Selinker.

• L2 learners construct a linguistic system that draws, in part, on the learner’s L1, but is also different from it and target language.

Page 7: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

1. The learner constructs a system of abstract linguistic rules which underlies comprehension and production of the L2.This system is viewed as a ‘mental grammar’ and referred to as an ‘interlanguage’

Page 8: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

2. The learner’s grammar is permeable.The grammar is open to influence from the outside (i.e. through the input) and the inside.

Page 9: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

3. The learner’s grammar is transitional.Interlanguage continuum, learners construct a series of mental grammars or interlanguages as they gradually increase the complexity of their L2 knowledge.

Page 10: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

4. Some researchers have claimed that the systems learners construct contain variable rules.

Page 11: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

5. Learners employ various learning strategies to develop their interlanguages.The different kinds of errors learners produce reflect different learning strategies.

Page 12: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

6. The learner’s grammar is likely to fossilize.The prevalence of backsliding (i.e. The production of errors representing an early stage of development) is typical of fossilized learners.

Page 13: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

• The concept of interlanguage can be implied as the data in the human mind computer.

the processes: creating intake & L2 knowledge occur within the ‘black box’ of the learner’s mind where the learner’s interlanguage is constructed L2 knowledge is used by learner producing written & spoken output.

input Intake L2 knowledge

output

Page 14: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

The learners exposed to input which is processed into 2 parts,

1.IntakeParts of it are attended to and taken into short-term memory.

2.L2 knowledgeSome of the intake is stored in long-term memory.

Page 15: Interlanguage Ellis 2003, Chapter 3 (pp.31-35)

Thank You