integrated seismic hazard

18
Academic Academic Opportunities Opportunities For Shaping a For Shaping a Better Future Better Future Ali O. Oncel Ali O. Oncel Earth Science Department, KFUPM Earth Science Department, KFUPM Chile University, Department of Geophysics, June 23, 2008 Chile University, Department of Geophysics, June 23, 2008 Integrated Seismic Hazard Integrated Seismic Hazard based on based on Seismicity and Strain Seismicity and Strain

Upload: ali-osman-oencel

Post on 08-Jul-2015

683 views

Category:

Career


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Integrated Seismic Hazard

Academic Academic OpportunitiesOpportunities

For Shaping a For Shaping a Better FutureBetter Future

Ali O. Oncel Ali O. Oncel Earth Science Department, KFUPMEarth Science Department, KFUPM

Chile University, Department of Geophysics, June 23, 2008Chile University, Department of Geophysics, June 23, 2008

Integrated Seismic Hazard Integrated Seismic Hazard based onbased on

Seismicity and StrainSeismicity and Strain

Page 2: Integrated Seismic Hazard

Integrated Earthquake Hazard based on Integrated Earthquake Hazard based on Seismicity and Active FaultsSeismicity and Active Faults

Page 3: Integrated Seismic Hazard

Log N = a – b MLog N = a – b M

MAGNITUDE DISTRIBUTION

Log

N

0

1

2

3

4

0 2 4 6 8

MAGNITUDE

23-31°E

b-valueD15

D2

INTEREVENT DISTANCE R (KM)

CO

RR

EL

AT

ION

IN

TE

GR

AL

C( R

>r)

2-10km

10-40km

Full range

Full range 1.44 1.102-10 km 1.73 1.2210-40km 1.40 1.01

Range D2 D15

D (Fractal)-value D (Fractal)-value : : • DD22>D>D33>……>D>……>D1515 ⇒⇒

heterogeneous heterogeneous • DD22=D=D33=……=D=……=D1515 ⇒⇒

homogeneoushomogeneous

b-value b-value : : Material Material

heterogeneityheterogeneity• Applied shear stress Applied shear stress

levellevel• bbhighhigh ……>creeping ……>creeping• BBlow low …….> asperity…….> asperity

Fractal Statistics

Page 4: Integrated Seismic Hazard

A FR IC A N PLA TE

8

BLACK SEA

3

1

24

9

8 7

6 5

1312

11 10

15 14

1617

18

19

20

21

24

M >2.9h< 39km1981-1988

Shear Z oneE xtension al ZoneCom pressional ZoneGPS control points

23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3133

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

Mw 6.4 1995

Mw 5.8 1997

Mw 6.6 1982

Mw 6.6 1983

Mw 6.8 1981

Mw 6.2 1996

Mw 5.6 1996

25

Mw 5.5 1994

22

23

23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3133

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

23

87

6

12

11

15

17

18

19

20

21

24

25

23

22

23

1

4

9

13

5

10

14

16

0 20

40

60

80

10

0

12

0

14

0

16

0

18

0

20

0

22

0

24

0

26

0

28

0

Shear Strain

nstrain/a

23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3133

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0 10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10

0

11

0

87

6

12

11

15

17

18

19

20

21

24

Compr. Extens.

nstrain/a

25

23

22

23

1

4

9

13

5

10

14

16

Strain and earthquake hazardStrain and earthquake hazard

Contour maps of GPS derived shear and dilatation are shown in the maps above (middle and right maps, Contour maps of GPS derived shear and dilatation are shown in the maps above (middle and right maps, respectively). GPS strains were derived by Kahle et al. (2000) from GPS velocity data presented by respectively). GPS strains were derived by Kahle et al. (2000) from GPS velocity data presented by McCloskey et al. (2000) for the western Turkey and eastern Mediterranean area examined in this paper. McCloskey et al. (2000) for the western Turkey and eastern Mediterranean area examined in this paper. Average shear and dilatation in each seismic zone were estimated by averaging contour values of shear Average shear and dilatation in each seismic zone were estimated by averaging contour values of shear and dilatation observed on the regular grid of points highlighted in the map above.and dilatation observed on the regular grid of points highlighted in the map above.

GPS control points are shown along with events of magnitude M>3.0 recorded between 1981 and 1998. GPS control points are shown along with events of magnitude M>3.0 recorded between 1981 and 1998. The 25 seismic zones into which the area was subdivided for analysis and comparison are also outlined.The 25 seismic zones into which the area was subdivided for analysis and comparison are also outlined.

Page 5: Integrated Seismic Hazard

A FR IC AN PLATE

8

BLACK SEA

3

1

24

9

8 7

6 5

1312

11 10

15 14

1617

18

19

20

21

24

M >2.9h< 39km1981-1988

Shear ZoneExtensional ZoneCom pressional ZoneG PS control points

23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3133

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

Mw 6.4 1995

Mw 5.8 1997

Mw 6.6 1982

Mw 6.6 1983

Mw 6.8 1981

Mw 6.2 1996

Mw 5.6 1996

25

Mw 5.5 1994

22

23

D2 D15 D2 D15 D2 D15 b ML-

MU

Shear

Dilitation1 1.44 1.1 1.73 1.22 1.4 1.01 1.51 2.6-5.0 161.79 19.38

2 1.43 1.07 1.81 1.33 1.43 1.12 1.39 2.6-5.5 201.07 3.633 1.62 1.42 1.9 1.28 1.49 1.26 1.47 3.1-4.8 164.82 12.884 1.24 0.84 1.86 1.5 1.02 0.64 1.11 3.5-6.0 191.60 25.857 1.53 1.24 1.94 1.48 1.48 1.23 1.24 3.2-6.0 101.71 55.878 1.32 0.86 1.85 1.13 1.37 0.92 1.16 3.2-4.9 189.45 3.889 1.18 0.83 1.86 1.4 1.14 0.64 0.97 3.0-5.3 146.38 11.555 1.07 0.73 1.85 1.59 0.95 0.57 1.75 2.6-4.7 41.02 36.216 1.33 0.92 1.81 1.56 1.22 0.78 1.81 2.7-4.8 78.75 33.68

10 0.89 0.58 1.46 0.95 0.87 0.46 1.35 3.0-4.8 70.32 44.6911 1.48 1.2 1.83 1.37 1.53 1.24 1.39 3.0-5.8 102.35 40.9612 1.52 1.26 1.89 1.37 1.53 1.39 1.5 3.2-5.1 72.75 75.8313 1.36 1 1.86 1.71 0.75 0.41 1.1 3.1-5.5 89.26 25.5114 1.4 1.08 1.79 1.26 1.4 1.19 1.32 2.9-5.5 78.81 53.6615 1.57 1.26 1.93 1.36 1.59 1.31 1.28 3.1-5.4 78.25 54.3916 1.38 0.99 1.42 0.97 1.24 0.94 1.4 3.1-5.4 47.99 38.1217 1.42 1.05 1.78 1.44 1.37 1 1.22 3.2-5.4 50.59 37.2218 1.61 1.32 1.9 0.81 1.64 1.43 1.25 3.6-4.9 58.89 80.9119 1.43 1.18 1.88 1.16 1.2 0.88 0.67 3.5-5.2 38.75 22.0920 1.74 1.5 1.81 1.04 1.77 1.64 1.44 3.5-5.3 68.88 20.7621 1.44 1.09 1.79 1.51 0.92 0.55 1.21 3.7-5.0 95.04 18.2722 1.68 1.38 1.87 1.12 1.63 1.39 1.49 3.2-4.6 54.22 10.2123 1.63 1.04 1.82 1.27 1.61 0.99 1.24 3.8-5.7 107.79 -22.8724 1.65 1.23 1.57 0.93 1.75 1.47 1.08 3.7-5.5 103.39 -40.3925 1.45 1.09 2 1.07 1.55 1.08 1.21 3.5-5.8 75.28 -16.12

Complex VariablesComplex Variables

Page 6: Integrated Seismic Hazard

D2 D15 D2 D15 D2 D15 b Shear Dilitation

1.43/1.39 1.07/1.05 1.86/1.85 1.33/1.33 1.4/1.33 1.01/0.97 1.24/1.26 164.8/165.3 12.88/19

1.41/1.37 1.06/1.05 1.84/1.78 1.36/1.29 1.3/1.27 0.97/0.97 1.34/1.34 71.54/67.3 39.5/45.3

1.64/1.6 1.16/1.22 1.82/1.81 1.1/1.16 1.62/1.54 1.24/1.19 1.23/1.28 85.16/84.1 -3/-5

Median/mean values of multifractal correlation dimensions DMedian/mean values of multifractal correlation dimensions D22 and D and D1515 are are

tabulated for the full range, 2 to 10km range and 10 to 40 km range for each tabulated for the full range, 2 to 10km range and 10 to 40 km range for each tectonic subdivision of the study area (shear, extension, and compression). tectonic subdivision of the study area (shear, extension, and compression). The median/mean values of b, shear, and dilatation are also listed for each The median/mean values of b, shear, and dilatation are also listed for each tectonic region.tectonic region.

Over the full range:Over the full range: D D22 measured in the region of compression is statistically greater than measured in the region of compression is statistically greater than

DD22 in the regions of extension and shear. D in the regions of extension and shear. D1515 is less than D is less than D22 in all cases in all cases..Over the 2-10 km scaleOver the 2-10 km scale: Statistically significant differences between regions are not : Statistically significant differences between regions are not observed.observed.

Over the 10-40km scale:Over the 10-40km scale: The larger value of D in the region of compression suggests The larger value of D in the region of compression suggests that differences observed over the full range are primarily associated with variations that differences observed over the full range are primarily associated with variations occurring at larger 10-40km scalesoccurring at larger 10-40km scales..

Regional comparison betweenRegional comparison between seismicity and GPS strainseismicity and GPS strain

Page 7: Integrated Seismic Hazard

The correlation coefficient, r The correlation coefficient, r = 0.81= 0.81

The probability (p) that the The probability (p) that the slope of the regression line slope of the regression line could actually be zero is could actually be zero is 0.026 in this case. 0.026 in this case.

Cross-plot of b values and DCross-plot of b values and D22 from the from the Northern Anatolian Fault ZoneNorthern Anatolian Fault Zone

Page 8: Integrated Seismic Hazard

D2 D15 b Shear Dilat D2 D15 b Shear Dilat D2 D15 b Shear Dilat

D2 0.97 0.81 -0.29 0.28 0.5 -0.39 -0.49 0.49 0.96 0.74 -0.26 0.08

D15 0 0.75 -0.38 0.31 0.25 -0.4 -0.39 0.65 0 0.77 -0.28 0.23

b 0.03 0.05 -0.1 -0.06 0.39 0.37 -0.1 -0.06 0.06 0.05 -0.1 -0.06Shear 0.52 0.4 0.83 -0.79 0.26 0.39 0.83 -0.79 0.57 0.54 0.83 -0.79Dilat 0.55 0.5 0.9 0.03 0.26 0.12 0.9 0.03 0.86 0.63 0.9 0.03Over the full range: Over the full range: A significant positive correlation is observed between A significant positive correlation is observed between seismic clustering (D) and the Gutenberg-Richter b value along the NAFZ seismic clustering (D) and the Gutenberg-Richter b value along the NAFZ strike slip zone.strike slip zone.Over the 10 -40 km scale: Over the 10 -40 km scale: A A nearly significant relationship between b and nearly significant relationship between b and D is observed (r = 0.74, p = 0.06) and suggests that the relationship is D is observed (r = 0.74, p = 0.06) and suggests that the relationship is primarily associated with deeper or regional scale seismicity since primarily associated with deeper or regional scale seismicity since significant correlation is not observed significant correlation is not observed over the 2 to 10 km scaleover the 2 to 10 km scale..

No correlation was observed between seismicity ( b, DNo correlation was observed between seismicity ( b, D22, D, D1515) and GPS ) and GPS

strain.strain.

Seismicity and GPS strainSeismicity and GPS strain

Page 9: Integrated Seismic Hazard

NegativeCorrelation

Large-magnitude events

Izmit EarthquakeIzmit EarthquakeIncreased b and decreased DIncreased b and decreased DCC suggest that the suggest that the

rise in the level of low magnitude seismicity and rise in the level of low magnitude seismicity and high intensity clustering along the western high intensity clustering along the western portion of NAFZ did not completely release portion of NAFZ did not completely release stress transferred into this segment of the fault stress transferred into this segment of the fault zone (zone (Oncel et al., 1995, Oncel et al., 1995, Non.Lineer.Geophysics; Oncel and Wilson, Non.Lineer.Geophysics; Oncel and Wilson, 2001, BSSA2001, BSSA).).

This combination of factors - westward migration This combination of factors - westward migration along with increased levels of low magnitude along with increased levels of low magnitude seismicity and higherseismicity and higher intensity seismic clustering - intensity seismic clustering - are indicators of increased seismic risk in the area.are indicators of increased seismic risk in the area.

Low-magnitude events(Preshocks)

PositiveCorrelation

Page 10: Integrated Seismic Hazard

D2 D15 b Shear Dilat D2 D15 b Shear Dilat D2 D15 b Shear Dilat

D2 0.98 -0.29 0.18 0.4 0.48 -0.13 0.18 0.2 0.98 0 0.13 0.67

D15 0 -0.38 0.18 0.46 0.12 0.28 0.31 -0.44 0 -0.05 0.15 0.73

b 0.36 0.23 0.18 0.21 0.69 0.38 0.18 0.21 1 0.88 0.18 0.21Shear 0.57 0.59 0.57 0.13 0.57 0.34 0.57 0.13 0.68 0.65 0.57 0.13Dilat 0.19 0.13 0.51 0.67 0.54 0.15 0.51 0.67 0.02 0.01 0.51 0.67

Over the 2-10 km scale: Over the 2-10 km scale: Significant correlation is not observed between Significant correlation is not observed between seismic clustering and dilatation.seismic clustering and dilatation.

Over the full range: Over the full range: Significant correlation between b and D is not Significant correlation between b and D is not observed.observed.

Over the 10 -40 km scale: Over the 10 -40 km scale: In this subdivision, seismic clustering (DIn this subdivision, seismic clustering (D22 and and

DD1515) correlate positively with dilatation (r = 0.67 and 0.73 with p = 0.02 and ) correlate positively with dilatation (r = 0.67 and 0.73 with p = 0.02 and

0.01 respectively). The correlations suggest that increased rates of 0.01 respectively). The correlations suggest that increased rates of extension produce increasingly dispersed seismicity. extension produce increasingly dispersed seismicity.

Seismicity and GPS strain Seismicity and GPS strain

Page 11: Integrated Seismic Hazard

D2 D15 b Shear Dilat D2 D15 b Shear Dilat D2 D15 b Shear Dilat

D2 0.76 0.51 -0.25 0.03 0.21 0.44 -0.54 0.38 0.9 0.22 -0.22 -0.41

D15 0.08 0.71 -0.68 0.47 0.69 -0.02 0.26 0.46 0.01 0.39 -0.44 -0.1

b 0.3 0.12 -0.83 0.73 0.38 0.97 -0.83 0.73 0.68 0.45 -0.83 0.73Shear 0.64 0.14 0.04 -0.6 0.26 0.62 0.04 -0.6 0.68 0.39 0.04 -0.6Dilat 0.96 0.34 0.1 0.21 0.46 0.37 0.1 0.21 0.43 0.84 0.1 0.21

One would expect seismicity to correlate moreso with dilatation in a subduction zone. One would expect seismicity to correlate moreso with dilatation in a subduction zone. However, dilatation along the subduction zone is on average only slightly negative.However, dilatation along the subduction zone is on average only slightly negative. Dilatation is positive in the areas to the northeast (17 nstrain/a) and negative (-29 nstrain/a) Dilatation is positive in the areas to the northeast (17 nstrain/a) and negative (-29 nstrain/a) farther west along the subduction zone. This combination of positive and negative dilatation farther west along the subduction zone. This combination of positive and negative dilatation along the subduction zone is probably responsible for the lack of a more significant correlation along the subduction zone is probably responsible for the lack of a more significant correlation between b and dilatation. between b and dilatation. The change of dilatation from positive to negative as one goes east to west along the The change of dilatation from positive to negative as one goes east to west along the subduction zone suggests a transition in plate interaction from transtensional to transpressive.subduction zone suggests a transition in plate interaction from transtensional to transpressive.

Over the full range: Over the full range: Variations of b value correlate negatively with shear (r = -0.83, p = 0.04) Variations of b value correlate negatively with shear (r = -0.83, p = 0.04) in the zones of this subdivision. The correlation of b to dilatation is weakly positive (r = 0.73, p = in the zones of this subdivision. The correlation of b to dilatation is weakly positive (r = 0.73, p = 0.1). 0.1).

Seismicity and GPS strain Seismicity and GPS strain

Page 12: Integrated Seismic Hazard
Page 13: Integrated Seismic Hazard

Mean magnitude and Geodetical StrainMean magnitude and Geodetical StrainIntegrated Earthquake Hazard based on Integrated Earthquake Hazard based on Seismicity and Geodetical MomentSeismicity and Geodetical Moment

Page 14: Integrated Seismic Hazard
Page 15: Integrated Seismic Hazard
Page 16: Integrated Seismic Hazard

Seismic b-value and average dilatation are positively related (r=0.5, p=0.05). D2 correlates negatively with maximum Geodetic Strain and Shear Strain (r=-0.56. p=0.03 and r=-0.56, p=0.02).

Page 17: Integrated Seismic Hazard

A s p e r it y b a s e d H a z a r d M o d e l

TTLL(M) = dT/10 (M) = dT/10 (a-bM)(a-bM)

Oncel and Wyss, 2000Oncel and Wyss, 2000

Page 18: Integrated Seismic Hazard

Asperity Hazard Model

•• within the northern

Marmara Sea region.

Maps of recurrence interval are shown for (a) Hs = Maps of recurrence interval are shown for (a) Hs = 12.5km over the region of analysis conducted by 12.5km over the region of analysis conducted by Oncel and Wyss (2000) and (b) Hs =4km .Oncel and Wyss (2000) and (b) Hs =4km .

Geodetical Moment Rate Geodetical Moment Rate Kostrov 1974Kostrov 1974

Geodetical Strain Rate Geodetical Strain Rate Ward, 1994Ward, 1994

Oncel and Wilson, 2006Oncel and Wilson, 2006

NBFNBFCMFCMF