initial study-nd pedestrian action plan 2015 · 2015-11-24 · the “project”). the proposed...

City of Santa Monica

Pedestrian Action Plan

Initial Study/Negative Declaration

October 2015

City of Santa Monica Planning and Community Development Department

1685 Main Street Santa Monica, CA 90401

City of

Santa Monica

CITY OF SANTA MONICA PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN INITIAL STUDY / NEGATIVE DECLARATION

Initial Study/ Negative Declaration October 2015

of 41

INTRODUCTION

This document is an Initial Study/Negative Declaration to evaluate the potential environmental effects of the City of Santa Monica’s proposed Pedestrian Action Plan (also referenced herein as the “Project”). The proposed Pedestrian Action Plan is a project subject to the guidelines and regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Therefore, this document has been prepared in compliance with the relevant provisions of CEQA and the 2015 State CEQA Guidelines as implemented by the City of Santa Monica. This Initial Study/Negative Declaration evaluates the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects associated with the Plan, as proposed. The Plan is described in detail in Section 2.3, Project Characteristics.

BACKGROUND

The Pedestrian Action Plan expresses the community’s future vision for Santa Monica where walking on City streets is safer and more comfortable. Multiple City plans reflect the City’s expressed values to emphasize walking and pedestrian well-being, and many adopted policies indicate a desire to improve the walking environment for Santa Monica’s residents and visitors. In the area of pedestrian planning, they have a common vision: they recognize that the vitality of the City relies on an active pedestrian network.

The outreach associated with the adopted Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE) solidified the need for additional focus on walking and the pedestrian environment. For a six-year period, beginning in 2004, LUCE workshops and events inspired community-wide conversations about the City’s future and issues that affect people’s quality of life. Encouraging and improving walking was one of the key issues.

The Pedestrian Action Plan represents the culmination of community dialogue on walking. Developing the Pedestrian Action Plan involved a high level of community engagement including community surveys, public workshops, and broadcasting via City publications and website. All of this community outreach has helped to guide the Plan and its policies and actions.

PURPOSE AND LEGAL AUTHORITY

In accordance with CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. Seq.) and the 2015 State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Santa Monica as lead agency is required to undertake the preparation of an Initial Study to determine whether the Project would have a significant environmental impact. If, as a result of the Initial Study, the lead agency finds that there is evidence that any aspect of the Project may cause a significant environmental effect, the lead agency shall further find that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is warranted to analyze Project-related and cumulative environmental impacts. Alternatively, if the lead agency finds that there is no evidence that the Project, either as proposed or as modified to include the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study, may cause a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency shall find that the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment and shall prepare a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration (ND or MND) for the Project. Such determination can be made only if “there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency” that such an effect may occur (Section 21080(c), Public Resources Code).

Pursuant to CEQA, the City of Santa Monica has prepared this Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) to evaluate the potential environmental effects of the proposed Pedestrian Action Plan.



of 41

This IS/ND addresses all environmental issues listed in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. Based on the analysis provided within this Initial Study/Negative Declaration, the City has concluded that adoption of the proposed Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in significant impacts on the environment.

This IS/ND, which is ultimately required to be adopted by the City Council, is intended as an informational document. Additionally, future individual projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be subject to review on a project-by-project basis to determine compliance with CEQA. If necessary, project-level CEQA review will be required to determine project-specific impacts. Evaluation of future project-level impacts would be too speculative to include in this IS/ND (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15145).



of 41

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

INITIAL STUDY / NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT STATEMENT

1. Project title:

City of Santa Monica Pedestrian Action Plan

2. Lead agency name and address:

City of Santa Monica 1685 Main Street Santa Monica, CA 90407

3. Contact person and phone number:

Rachel Kwok (310) 458-8341

4. Project location:

Citywide – The City of Santa Monica is located in west Los Angeles County. The coastal City comprises approximately 8.25 square miles bounded on the north, south, and east by the City of Los Angeles, and on the west by the Pacific Ocean. Surrounding communities in the City of Los Angeles include Pacific Palisades, Brentwood, West Los Angeles, Mar Vista, and Venice.

Figure 1 (Regional Location Map) illustrates the regional location of the City of Santa Monica. Regional access to the City is provided by Interstate 10 (Santa Monica Freeway), which bisects the City, the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH), which traverses the western edge of the City, and State Route 1 (Lincoln Boulevard).

5. Project sponsor's name and address:

City of Santa Monica Strategic and Transportation Planning

6. General plan designation:

Citywide

7. Zoning:

Citywide

8. Description of project:

The Pedestrian Action Plan provides a comprehensive approach to pedestrian policy in Santa Monica. Walking is one of the City’s most popular past times, for recreation, exercise and as an alternative to automobile travel. While pedestrian oriented policies are threaded through existing Santa Monica policy, the City lacks one comprehensive document that prioritizes the walking experience to consistently provide a sense of comfort throughout the



of 41

City. The Plan responds to the City’s goal to reduce pedestrian related incidents and provide an environment that encourages walking.

The goals, policies and actions in the Pedestrian Action plan address the input gathered from the community, stake holders and key professionals such as public safety personnel, transportation planners and engineers, while aligning a vision with data analysis to develop strategies that prioritize actions for the short and long terms. The plan introduces a Vision Zero program which envisions zero fatalities from pedestrian crashes. Components of the program include prioritizing and organizing community safety goals, and facilitating the systematic implementation of current and future actions that support safer walkability for people of all ages and abilities. The Plan includes a tool box that provides guidance to best address existing and future street conditions to help all City departments recognize and respond to pedestrian priorities. The Plan proposes a multi-disciplined approach to making physical, operational and educational improvements that prioritize pedestrians. Many of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in physical impacts on the environment (e.g., Pedestrian Safety Campaigns, etc.). Implementation of the pedestrian projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be dependent on the availability of funding sources. As a programmatic document, specific physical projects that implement the plan would be subject to future environmental review on an individual basis.

Pedestrian Action Plan– Immediate and Future Implementation

Programs & Practices

Safe Routes to School

Vision Zero Santa Monica

Pedestrian Safety Campaigns

Safe Routes for Seniors

Walk for Sustainability

Open Streets

Residential Transportation Demand Management

Work Zone Pedestrian Safety

Walk Downtown Program

Group Walking Events

Pedestrian Wayfinding, Signs and Maps

Activate and Beautify Streets

Improvements to City Practices, e.g. Data Collection & Monitoring

Citywide Projects

Traffic Signal and Intersection Modification Program

Pavement Striping Program

Place-Making Program

Pedestrian Scale Lighting

Curb Extension and Refuge Island Program

Improvements that Serve Vulnerable Community members



of 41

Speed Reduction Strategies

Location Specific Projects

Walkway Enhancements

Crossing Enhancements

Operational Improvements

9. Surrounding land uses and setting:

The City of Santa Monica is an urbanized coastal city, bounded by communities of the City of Los Angeles to the north, east and south, and the Pacific Ocean to the west. The City includes 8.3 square miles and has a population of 89,736 residents. The City also attracts a high number of tourists and visitors, particularly during the summer months. Land uses in the City consist of a mix of commercial, residential, light industrial, recreational, and open space uses.

10. Decision-making bodies or agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.)

The proposed Pedestrian Action Plan would require the following discretionary approvals:

• Adoption of the Negative Declaration by City Council, after recommendation from Planning Commission

• Adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan by City Council, after recommendation from the Planning Commission



of 41

FIGURE 1 – CITY OF SANTA MONICA REGIONAL LOCATION MAP



of 41

FIGURE 2 – PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS



of 41


Initial Study/ Negative Declaration October 2015 of 41

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:

The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality

Biological Resources Construction Effects Cultural Resources

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Geology/Soils Hazards & Hazardous Materials

Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources

Neighborhood Effects Noise Population/Housing

Public Services Recreation Shadows

Transportation/Traffic Utilities/Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance



DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)

On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

_________________________________________________________ Rachel Kwok Environmental Planner

___________________ Date



Potentially Significant

Impact

Less Than Significant

With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

I. AESTHETICS. Would the project:

a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?

b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?

c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?

d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?

a,b) No Impact. A scenic vista is typically defined as a public view of highly valued visual and scenic resources such as the ocean and distant mountain ranges, particularly from public vantage points. Major scenic vistas in the City are those associated with the beach, the bay, the Pier, and the bluffs. Policies in the City‘s Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan (LUP) are directed towards preserving and enhancing the public views associated with these resources, as well as improving the visual quality of the inland urbanized area of the Coastal Zone. Examples of local scenic views include those of the Pacific Ocean, the Santa Monica Mountains, and urban scenic resources along major roadways. In general, public views of the Pacific Ocean are available from the coastal areas (e.g., along Pacific Coast Highway and Ocean Avenue). At some locations along north-south roadways, channeled public views of the Santa Monica Mountains are available. Public views of urban scenic resources (such as the Santa Monica Pier) are available from locations near the particular resource. In addition, a number of scenic resources including scenic highways, trees, and historic buildings, exist in the City.

The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the Plan would not result in an impact on a scenic vista or scenic resources. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in physical impacts on the environment (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs). In addition, the pedestrian projects that do involve physical improvements (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) are proposed at grade and on the existing street network and thus, would not result in the removal/disturbance of existing scenic vistas or scenic resources in the City. Furthermore, implementation of the projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be dependent on the availability of funding sources and would be subject to future environmental review on a case by case basis. Therefore, the proposed Pedestrian Action Plan would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista or scenic resources, and no impacts would occur.



c) No Impact. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in an impact on visual character. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in physical impacts on the environment (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs). The projects in the Plan that do involve physical improvements (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) would create a more attractive and pleasant pedestrian environment. For example, the installation of street furnishings, tree wells, passive open space areas, and pedestrian lighting would contribute to a more vibrant streetscape. Therefore, the visual character of the existing environment is anticipated to be improved. Furthermore, implementation of the pedestrian projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be dependent on the availability of funding sources and would be subject to future environmental review on a case by case basis. Therefore, the proposed Pedestrian Action Plan would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the City, and no impacts would occur.

d) No Impact. The City is primarily built-out, and a significant amount of ambient light from urban uses already exists. Similar to other developed urban areas, sources of light and glare include glass building facades, building signage, security lighting, street lights, parking lot lighting, and automobile headlights. In general, commercial areas such as the Downtown and the City’s boulevards have the highest level of nighttime lighting.

The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in an impact related to lights/glare. Although some of the pedestrian projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would include the installation of pedestrian safety and wayfinding lighting, such lighting would be directed onto the areas to be lit as to minimize spillover onto light-sensitive uses and would be installed in accordance with Santa Monica Municipal Code lighting requirements. Furthermore, implementation of the pedestrian projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be dependent on the availability of funding sources and would be subject to future environmental review on a case by case basis. Therefore, the proposed Pedestrian Action Plan would not have a substantial adverse effect on lighting/glare, and no impacts would occur.




Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No Impact

II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997), prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:

a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?

b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?

c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?

d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?

e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?

a through e) No Impact. The City of Santa Monica is completely urbanized and does not contain any designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance ; agricultural land, or forest land. Furthermore, neither agricultural or forest land occur in the City. Therefore, no impacts would occur.




Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No Impact

III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:

a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?

b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?

c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?

d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?

e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?

a through d) No Impact. The City of Santa Monica is located with the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which is regulated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Pursuant to the Clean Air Act, SCAQMD has prepared the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants in the SCAB. Pollutants emitted into the ambient air by stationary and mobile sources are regulated by federal and state law. Air pollutants are categorized as primary or secondary pollutants. Primary air pollutants are emitted directly from sources. Carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10), fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5), and lead (Pb) are primary air pollutants. Of these, CO, SO2, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5 are “criteria air pollutants,” which means that ambient air quality standards (AAQS) have been established for them at the federal (National AAQS) or state level (California AAQS). The SCAB is currently in nonattainment for ozone (“O3”), nitrogen dioxide (“NO2”), respirable particulate matter (“PM10”) and fine particulate matter (“PM2.5”). The AQMP contains a comprehensive list of pollution control strategies directed at reducing emissions and achieving ambient air quality standards.

The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in an adverse impact on air quality. Rather, the Pedestrian Action Plan would result in beneficial environmental effects on air quality through policies, programs, and projects that would promote walking as an alternative means of



transportation in the City. The Plan would help to reduce, not increase, vehicular air pollutant emissions. Therefore, the proposed Pedestrian Action Plan would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan, violate an air quality standard, result in the increase of any criteria pollutant, or expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. No impacts would occur.

e) No Impact. According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding. Potential operational airborne odors result from cooking activities associated with residential and restaurant uses. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in an impact related to odors. None of the policies, programs, or projects contained in the plan would have the potential to generate odors. Therefore, no impacts would occur.


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No Impact

IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either

directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?

b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?

c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands, as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal wetlands, etc.), through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption or other means?

d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?




Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No Impact

e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?

f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan?

a through d) No Impact. The majority of the City of Santa Monica has been developed, paved, or landscaped, and is generally devoid of large expanses of habitat that support sensitive species. No major regional wildlife migration corridors are known to exist within the City limits. No native riparian habitat, blueline streams, wetlands, or sensitive natural communities are located in the City limits. The beach areas of the City do provide foraging and roosting opportunities for several special status species (e.g., least terns). The City is not recognized as an existing or proposed Significant Ecological Area (SEA) that links wildlife populations.

Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in physical impacts on the environment (e.g., bicycle pedestrian awareness/promotional programs). Furthermore, the pedestrian projects that do involve physical improvements (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) are proposed on the City’s existing street network and would not cross through undisturbed natural areas. Therefore, no impacts to sensitive species, wetlands, or migratory species would occur.

e) No Impact. There are over 33,800 trees in the City’s Urban Forest comprising over 250 different species. All trees, shrubs or plants within the City’s right-of-way are protected under the provisions of Santa Monica Municipal Code Chapter 7.40, referred to as the City of Santa Monica Tree Code. The City of Santa Monica Tree Code includes policies governing the removal of trees on public land. Section 7.40.110(a) of the City of Santa Monica Tree Code states that “No person, firm, or corporation shall remove, cut, trim, prune, plant, injure, or interfere with any tree, shrub, or plant upon any street or public place of the City without a permit from the Director of Recreation and Parks or the Director of General Services.” In addition, the City of Santa Monica Urban Forest Master Plan (UFMP) provides guiding standards and requirements related to the overall management of the City’s urban forest. Per the City’s UFMP, the best option for existing trees is for them to remain in their existing location.1

The Pedestrian Action Plan would not conflict with a local ordinance protecting biological resources including trees. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in physical impacts on environment (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs). In addition, the pedestrian projects within the Pedestrian Action Plan include

1 City of Santa Monica, Urban Forest Master Plan, December 2011.



walkway enhancements that would provide for the planting of new public trees. Furthermore, implementation of the pedestrian projects would be dependent on the availability of funding sources and would be subject to future environmental review on a case by case basis. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

f) No Impact. No Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved habitat conservation plan applies to the City of Santa Monica. Therefore, the proposed Pedestrian Action Plan would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan and no impacts would occur.


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No Impact

V. CONSTRUCTION EFFECTS. Would the project:

a) Have considerable construction-period impacts due to the scope, or location of construction activities?

a) No Impact. Adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in considerable construction impacts. Most of the programs proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in physical impacts on the environment (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs). The projects in the Plan that do involve physical improvements (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) would require minimal construction activities (e.g., minor grading, new paving, installation of tree wells, street furnishings, etc.). These construction activities are not anticipated to result in significant impacts with regard to air quality, noise, and/or traffic (see Checklist Questions III, XIV, IX). Furthermore, construction of the pedestrian projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be dependent on the availability of funding sources and would be subject to future environmental review on a case by case basis. Therefore, no impacts would occur.


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No Impact

VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:

a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5?

b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?

c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature?

d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?



a) No Impact. A historical resource is defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines as a resource listed in or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources; a resource included in a local register of historical resources; or any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record or manuscript determined to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military or cultural annals of California. Generally, a resource is considered to be “historically significant” if it meets one of the following criteria:

Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage;

Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past;

Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or

Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

Resources listed in or determined eligible for the California Register, included in a local register, or identified as significant in a historic resource survey are also considered historical resources under CEQA.

The City of Santa Monica contains numerous resources of historic and cultural value. The City‘s Historic Resources Inventory includes a listing of resources that are either designated as historic (at either the National, State, or local level), as well as resources that are potentially eligible for historic designation.

The Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in an impact on historic resources. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in physical impacts on the environment (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs). In addition, the pedestrian projects that do involve physical improvements (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) are proposed on the City’s existing street network and thus, would not result in the disturbance/removal of existing historic resources. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

b through d) No Impact. The greater Los Angeles region is known to be rich in subsurface archaeological resources, substantiated by an archaeological record that indicates a high level of habitation/seasonal habitation and resource use by Native Americans. However, the archaeological record is scattered and sparse due to previous ground disturbance.

Additionally, the City of Santa Monica rests on surficial deposits of older Quaternary Alluvium derived primarily from the Santa Monica Mountains to the north. These deposits usually do not contain significant paleontological resources such as vertebrate fossils in the uppermost layers, but they are underlain by older Quaternary deposits that do contain significant vertebrate fossils at varying depths beginning as shallow as 6 feet beneath the ground surface. Vertebrate fossil remains have been recovered within older Quaternary sediments encountered within the City and its surrounding areas. For this reason, there is the possibility that buried archaeological, paleontological resources, and human remains could be found in the City.



The Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in an impact on buried cultural resources including archaeological resources, paleontological resources, and human remains. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in physical impacts on the environment (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs). The pedestrian projects that do involve physical improvements (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) would not require substantial (if any) grading/ground disturbance. As such, the potential to uncover archaeological resources, paleontological resources, and human remains is highly unlikely. Furthermore, implementation of the pedestrian projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be dependent on the availability of funding sources and would be subject to future environmental review on a case by case basis. Therefore, no impacts would occur.




Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential

substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death, involving:

i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.

ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?

iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?

iv) Landslides?

b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?

c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?

d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?

e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?

a through d) No Impact. The Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in impacts related to geology/soils. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs) would not result in physical impacts on the environment. In addition, the pedestrian projects that do involve physical improvements (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) would not expose people or structures to greater geologic hazard exposure or risks than current conditions. Therefore, no impacts would occur.



e) No Impact. The City of Santa Monica is entirely served by an existing sewer network. The use of alternative wastewater disposal systems including septic tanks is not necessary in the City. Therefore, no impacts would occur.


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No Impact

VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either

directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?

b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?

a through b) No Impact. Greenhouse gases (GHGs) are gases that trap heat in the earth’s atmosphere. GHGs include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone (O3), water vapor, nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). The international scientific communities have recognized that GHGs are contributing to global climate change. Predicted effects of global climate change include sea level rise, water supply changes; changes to ecosystems and habitat; and human health effects.

In response to concern regarding GHGs and global climate change, the State passed Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32) also known as the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 (Health and Safety Code Section 38500 et. seq) mandated a reduction in the State’s greenhouse gas levels. In addition, Senate Bill 375 (SB375) passed by the State of California in 2009, requires metropolitan regions to adopt transportation plans and sustainable communities strategy that reduce vehicle miles travelled. In accordance with SB375, SCAG prepared and adopted the 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) with the primary goal of increasing mobility and enhancing sustainability for the region’s residents and visitors. SCAG’s 2012-2035 RTP/SCS places an important emphasis on sustainability and integrated land use/transportation planning.

The City of Santa Monica has also adopted the Sustainable City Plan (SCP) which includes targets of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 30 percent below 1990 levels by 2015 for City government operations and 15 percent below 1990 levels by 2015 Citywide. In 1990, GHG emissions for the City were 924,293 metric tons of CO2e. Therefore, the 2015 Citywide target is 785,649 metric tons CO2e by 2015 (a 15 percent reduction from 1990 levels). The existing Sustainable City Plan is anticipated to achieve most of the reductions from increased energy efficiency, increased renewable energy production, and reduced transportation-related emissions through increased use of public transit, rideshare programs, and alternatives to driving (i.e., walking or bicycling).



In addition, the LUCE was adopted as an integrated land use and transportation plan that would reduce the City‘s per capita carbon footprint and overall greenhouse gas emissions, consistent with the sustainability and active transportation goals and objectives mandated by AB32, SB 375, and SCAG’s RTP/SCS. The LUCE addresses GHG emissions through its land use and transportation policies such as focusing development near transit, creating complete neighborhoods, supporting infill mixed-use projects, affordable and transit-oriented housing located near jobs and transit. In addition, the LUCE supports a complete network of walking and bicycling, transit improvements, carpooling, and transportation demand management (TDM) strategies to reduce vehicle trips generated in the City. The LUCE goals and policies align with State regulations and policies for GHG reductions. In addition, the LUCE is intended to achieve to the GHG reduction targets reflected in the Sustainable City Plan. The LUCE goals and policies that follow reflect the City’s commitment to achieving a reduction in GHGs through walking:

GOAL LU8: Reduction of Vehicle Trip/Management of Congestion – Establish a complete transportation network that supports integrated land use. Ensure that transportation supports human activity and access to land uses through a diverse multi-modal transportation system that incentivizes walking, biking, and transit and reduces the need for vehicle trips.

Policy S2.1 Implement the VMT reduction policies of the Land Use and Circulation

Element of the General Plan, including, but not limited to: focusing new growth in mixed-use, transit oriented districts; focusing new growth along existing corridors and nodes; support the creation of complete, walkable neighborhoods with goods and services within walking distance of most homes; and promoting and supporting a wide range of pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvements in the City.

Policy S2.3 Advance the No Net New Trips goal in the Land Use and Circulation Element with TDM projects such as expanded rideshare programs, parking management strategies, as well as development impact fees for public transit infrastructure.

Policy LU2.5 Vehicle Trip Reduction. Achieve vehicle trip reduction through

comprehensive strategies that designate land uses, establish development and street design standards, implement sidewalk, bicycle and roadway improvements, expand transit service, manage parking, and strengthen Transportation Demand Management programs that support accessibility by transit, bicycle and foot, and discourage vehicle trips at a district-wide level. Monitor progress using tools that integrate land use and transportation factors. Increase bicycle and pedestrian connectivity in transit districts and adjust bus and shuttle services to ensure success of the transit system.

The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in an adverse impact on greenhouse gas emissions. Rather, the Pedestrian Action Plan establishes the policies, programs, and projects that would promote walking in the City. As indicated in the LUCE Final EIR (certified Environmental Impact Report SCH #2009041117) prepared in June 2010, the land use and transportation strategies provided in the LUCE would achieve a Citywide reduction in GHG emissions. The Pedestrian Action Plan promotes walking as a means of transportation, and is consistent with the LUCE goals to promote a reduction in vehicular trips and associated overall City-wide greenhouse gas emissions.



Based on the above, adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan would be consistent with the goals and policies of the City’s Sustainability Plan and the LUCE as well as state regulations for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, no impacts would occur.


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or

the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials?

b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?

c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?

d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code §65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?

e) For a project located within an airport land use plan area or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or a public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?

f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?

g) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?




Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?

a through c) No Impact. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in a physical impact related to hazards/hazardous materials. The policies, programs, and projects proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs, installation of wayfinding signage, pedestrian amenities, lighting, etc.) would not result in an increase in the use, or exposure of hazardous materials. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

d) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in an impact related to listing of a hazardous waste site. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs) would not result in physical impacts on the environment. In addition, the pedestrian projects that do involve physical improvements (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) would be located on the existing street network. Some of the proposed pedestrian improvements could cross through areas affected by existing hazardous waste sites; however, as previously noted, the pedestrian projects would be located at-grade and would not require substantial (if any) excavation/grading that could result in the exposure of hazardous materials on hazardous sites. Furthermore, implementation of the pedestrian projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be dependent on the availability of funding sources and would be subject to future environmental review on a case by case basis. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

e and f) No Impact. The Santa Monica Municipal Airport is located in the southeast portion of the City. All air traffic within the City current are subject to many stringent regulations to protect the public from potential aircraft hazards or other safety concerns, such as Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations and Caltrans regulations. Additionally, the airport‘s Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) addresses airport operations on public safety.

The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in an impact related to airport hazards. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs) would not result in physical impacts on the environment. While some pedestrian projects (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) could be located near the Santa Monica Airport, these projects would not expose people to airport hazards. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

g and h) No Impact. The City of Santa Monica is highly urbanized. No wildlands exists adjacent to the City, which could pose a significant wildfire risk. None of the policies, programs, or projects in the Pedestrian Action Plan would expose people or structures to wildfire risk. Therefore, no impacts would occur.




Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:

a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?

b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?

c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?

d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site?

e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?

f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?

g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?

h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows?




Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of a failure of a levee or dam?

j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow?

a through f) No Impact. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in an impact related to hydrology and water quality. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs) would not result in physical impacts on the environment. In addition, the pedestrian projects within the Plan are anticipated to result in a beneficial impact on water quality and surface drainage. For example, walkway enhancement projects would likely include the creation of landscaped/green areas (i.e., tree wells, parklets, planting strips, etc.) and/or permeable pavement, which would help increase water infiltration and reduce runoff. The proposed curb extensions in the Plan may also have stormwater management functions with the installation of small-scale bioswales. Furthermore, implementation of the pedestrian projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be dependent on the availability of funding sources and would be subject to future environmental review on a case by case basis. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

g through i) No Impact. The City of Santa Monica is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map. Additionally, no dam/flood control channels exist in the City. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

j) No Impact. A seiche is a standing wave occurring in an enclosed or partially enclosed body of water, such as a lake, reservoir, or bay. There are no enclosed or partially enclosed large bodies of water in the City. Therefore, the potential for inundation from a seiche is considered remote. No impacts relative to a seiche would occur.

Mudflows (also called debris flows) result from the downslope movement of soil and/or rock under the influence of gravity. The City is not located downslope from any steep hillsides. The City is not at risk from inundation by mudflow. No impacts from mudflow would occur.

A tsunami is a large ocean wave caused by a significant undersea disturbance such as earthquakes. Areas susceptible to a tsunami in the City include the low-lying beachfront areas. In the event of a tsunami, the City has designated tsunami evacuation routes (see Figure 6 – Tsunami Evacuation Routes) and has also adopted a Multi Hazard Functional Emergency Plan. The Plan sets forth a plan of action to reduce risk and prevent loss from large scale emergencies, including tsunamis.

Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs) would not result in physical impacts on the environment. In addition, the pedestrian projects that do involve physical improvements (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) would be located on the existing street network and thus, would not result in increased exposure to inundation.



Furthermore, implementation of the pedestrian projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be dependent on the availability of funding sources and would be subject to future environmental review on a case by case basis. Therefore, no impacts would occur.


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community?

b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?

c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?

a) No Impact. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs) would not result in physical impacts on the environment. Furthermore, the pedestrian projects that do involve physical improvements (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) are proposed on the existing street network and public right of ways, and thus, would not physically divide a community. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

b) No Impact. The Pedestrian Action Plan provides a comprehensive approach to pedestrian policy in Santa Monica. The Plan is consistent with the goals and vision of the Santa Monica Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE), particularly the Transportation Chapter of the LUCE and the Walking section (Section 4.0-26) of that Chapter. The Pedestrian Action Plan would not change any land use designations or transportation classifications within the adopted LUCE. The policies, programs, and projects included in the Pedestrian Action Plan were developed in the context of the LUCE and are necessary to achieve the Citywide goal of No Net New PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips and the City’s sustainability goals. The LUCE goals and policies related to pedestrian activity are:

GOAL LU8: Reduction of Vehicle Trip/Management of Congestion – Establish a complete transportation network that supports integrated land use. Ensure that transportation supports human activity and access to land uses through a diverse multi-modal transportation system that incentivizes walking, biking, and transit and reduces the need for vehicle trips. Policy LU 8:3 Pedestrian Bicycle, and Transit Connections. Ensure pedestrian, bicycle and transit mobility by creating facilities for comfortable walking throughout the City, a



complete and safe bicycle network, and convenient and frequent transit service that will make transit an attractive option for all types of trips. Policy LU15.1: Create Pedestrian-Oriented Boulevards – Orient the City’s auto dependent boulevards to be inviting avenues with wider sidewalks, improved transit, distinctive architecture, landscaping, trees, planted medians and neighborhood-friendly services – defining a new sense of place where local residents will be attracted to shop, work, live, and play. Policy LU15.5: Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity. Encourage the design of sites and buildings to facilitate easy pedestrian- and bicycle-oriented connections and to minimize the separation created by parking lots and driveways. Policy LU15.7: Street-Level Pedestrian- Oriented Design. Buildings in the mixed-use and commercial areas should generally be located at the back of the sidewalk or the property line (street front) and include active commercial uses on the ground floor. Where a residential use occupies the ground floor, it should be set back from the property line, be located one half level above the street, or incorporate design features to provide privacy for the unit. Front doors, porches, and stoops are encouraged as part of orienting residential units to the street. Policy LU15.9 Pedestrian-Oriented Design. Buildings should incorporate pedestrian-scaled elements with durable, quality materials, and detailing located on the lower stories adjacent to the pedestrian. Policy LU19.2 Balanced Modes. Design and operate streets with all users in mind including pedestrians, transit users, drivers, and pedestrians of all ages and abilities.

Goal N7: Ensure that walking and bicycling are safe and comfortable on all neighborhood streets at all times of the day Policy T1.1 Support public health by promoting active living and supporting walking and safe bike routes throughout the City.

Goal T6: Enable everyone to walk comfortably everywhere in Santa Monica Policy T6.1 Create appropriate enhancements to pedestrian crossings at key locations across all major boulevards. Policy T6.4 Use a combination of physical improvements and programs to promote walking. Goal T7: Ensure that walking is safe for everyone, everywhere in Santa Monica

Policy T7.1 Prioritize implementation of pedestrian safety improvements around community facilities and popular locations. Policy T7.2 Continue to enhance street lighting for pedestrians. Policy T7.3 Continuously implement technology to improve the pedestrian environment, including pursing the latest innovations.



Goal T8: Provide a beautiful and attractive pedestrian environment throughout the City

Policy S2.1 Implement the VMT reduction policies of the Land Use and Circulation Element of the General Plan, including, but not limited to: focusing new growth in mixed-use, transit oriented districts; focusing new growth along existing corridors and nodes; support the creation of complete, walkable neighborhoods with goods and services within walking distance of most homes; and promoting and supporting a wide range of pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvements in the City. Policy S2.3 Advance the No Net New Trips goal in the Land Use and Circulation Element with TDM projects such as expanded rideshare programs, parking management strategies, as well as development impact fees for public transit infrastructure.

Policy LU2.5 Vehicle Trip Reduction. Achieve vehicle trip reduction through comprehensive strategies that designate land uses, establish development and street design standards, implement sidewalk, bicycle and roadway improvements, expand transit service, manage parking, and strengthen Transportation Demand Management programs that support accessibility by transit, bicycle and foot, and discourage vehicle trips at a district-wide level. Monitor progress using tools that integrate land use and transportation factors. Increase bicycle and pedestrian connectivity in transit districts and adjust bus and shuttle services to ensure success of the transit system.

To achieve these goals, the Pedestrian Action Plan sets forth policies, programs, and projects that would promote walking in the City and improve the existing pedestrian network. Therefore, adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan would not conflict with the LUCE, but rather would support and help to achieve the LUCE goals. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

c) No Impact. No Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved habitat conservation plan is applicable to the City of Santa Monica. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with the provisions of an applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impacts would occur.


Impact


With Mitigation Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

XII. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known

mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?

b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?



a and b) No Impact. There are no areas in the City that are designated as existing mineral resource extraction areas by the State of California. Additionally, no mineral extraction operations occur in the City. Therefore, the proposed Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource or mineral resource recovery site. No impacts would occur.


Impact




Impact No

Impact

XIII. NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS. Would the project: a) Have considerable effects on the project

neighborhood?

a) No Impact. Neighborhood effects include those impacts that might affect the “quality of life” of the residents of adjacent and surrounding uses. Quality of life represents a composite impression, and is usually expressed in terms of overall environment, combining ambient noise levels, air quality, traffic congestion, and aesthetics of an area. Adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan would not result in an adverse impact on quality of life. Rather, the Pedestrian Action Plan would encourage and support walking as an alternative means of transportation and would help create a more pedestrian friendly City, thereby improving air quality, noise, traffic, and quality of life in neighborhoods. Therefore, no impacts would occur.


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

XIV. NOISE. Would the project result in:

a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or of applicable standards of other agencies?

b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?

c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?

d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?




Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

e) For a project located within an airport land use plan area or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or a public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?

f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?

a through d) No Impact. Chapter 4.12 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code comprises the City’s Noise Ordinance, which sets forth maximum noise standards for noise zones (residential, commercial, and industrial) in the City. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs) would not result in physical impacts on the environment. In addition, the pedestrian projects in the Pedestrian Action Plan (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) would not introduce new noise sources or result in an increase in ambient noise levels. Rather, the pedestrian projects would promote walking in the City and thus, would have the potential to reduce traffic-related noise. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

e and f) No Impact. The Santa Monica Airport is located in the southeastern portion of the City. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the Plan would not result in an impact related to airport noise. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs) would not result in physical impacts on the environment. In addition, the pedestrian projects that are proposed near the Santa Monica Airport would not have the potential to expose people residing or working in the area to excessive airport noise levels. Therefore, no impacts would occur.


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

XV. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:

a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?




Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?

c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?

a through c) No Impact. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in a population growth or displacement of housing/people. None of the policies, programs, and projects in the Pedestrian Action Plan would have the potential to induce population growth or displace housing/people (all pedestrian projects are proposed on the existing street network and would not cross through existing housing). Therefore, no impacts would occur.


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

XVI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:

a) Fire protection?

b) Police protection?

c) Schools?

d) Parks?

e) Other public facilities?

a through e) No Impact. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in impacts on public services. The policies, programs, and projects in the Pedestrian Action Plan are intended to promote walking and improve pedestrian facilities in the City. No increase in public services demand and/or the construction of public service facilities would occur. Implementation of the pedestrian projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be dependent on the availability of funding sources and would be subject to future environmental review on a case by case basis. Therefore, no impacts would occur.




Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

XVII. RECREATION. a) Would the project increase the use of

existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?

b) Does the project include recreational facilities, or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?

a and b) Less Than Significant Impact. The policies, programs, and projects in the Pedestrian Action Plan are intended to promote walking and improve the pedestrian environment in the City. No significant increase in recreational demand on public parks would occur. A number of the pedestrian projects would involve minor physical improvements within existing street right of rights (e.g., sidewalk widenings) to create a pedestrian friendly environment. These improvements may include parklets and other smaller passive recreational amenities that would not have significant adverse physical effects on the environment. Furthermore, construction of the pedestrian projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be dependent on the availability of funding sources and would be subject to future environmental review on a case by case basis. Therefore, no impacts would occur.


Impact




Impact No

Impact

XVIII. SHADOWS. Would the project: a) Produce extensive shadows affecting adjacent

uses or property?

a) No Impact. Shadow impacts occur when a new building/structure of sufficient height casts shadows onto nearby sensitive receptors. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs) would not result in physical impacts on the environment. Furthermore, none of the pedestrian projects (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) include the construction of significant above-grade facilities that could produce substantial shadows onto sensitive uses. Pedestrian light poles and signage poles would not be anticipated to result in significant adverse shadow effects. Therefore, no impacts would occur.




Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

IX. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance

or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?

b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?

c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks?

d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?

e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or

programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities?

a) No Impact. The Pedestrian Action Plan provides a comprehensive approach to pedestrian policy in Santa Monica. The policies, programs, and projects proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs) are intended to promote walking as an alternative means of transportation and would further the LUCE goal of No Net New PM Peak Hour Trips. As shown in the table that follows, the Pedestrian Action Plan identifies projects that would improve the existing pedestrian environment and facilitate mobility in the City.



Pedestrian Project

Description

Walkway Enhancements

Walkway enhancements that increase the actual and perceived safety of walkers include wide sidewalks, lighting, a vibrant commercial streetscape, street furnishings. Walkway enhancement projects in the City of Santa Monica will be implemented across the city in response to community demand to make the walking environment more attractive and convenient.

New sidewalk connections; wider sidewalks; landscaping; pedestrian scaled lighting; pedestrian buffers; wayfinding; new tree wells; permeable paving for pedestrians; traffic calming measures

Crossing Enhancements

The crossing enhancement projects attempt to increase visibility of pedestrians, both as they are waiting to cross the street and while they are in the crosswalk. In addition, they aim to minimize the amount of time and distance pedestrians are in the roadway by specifically reducing the crossing distance through lane reductions or hardscape improvements.

Curb extensions; flashing beacons; median islands; ADA compliant curb ramps; removal of some turning lanes; median islands; curb extensions; high visibility crosswalks

Operational Enhancements

Operational improvements, such as innovative signal phasing or timing solutions, manage the existing street network to separate pedestrians from motorists.

Signal improvements (including modification of turn restrictions, signal timing, addition of signal phases, new signals); and school/loading zone provisions

The proposed projects in the Plan would improve the pedestrian environment in the City. While some of the projects, such as removal of turning lanes, could potentially modify existing traffic patterns, the Pedestrian Action Plan would help reduce vehicle miles traveled and improve overall circulation/mobility in the City.

Furthermore, the Pedestrian Action Plan is consistent with the CEQA guidance contained within Senate Bill (SB 743), passed in September 2013. SB 743 calls for the elimination of vehicle delay and LOS as a CEQA significance criterion for the analysis of transportation impacts. The basic reason for this change at the state level is the recognition that there can be conflicts between improvements that benefit automobiles versus those that benefit other modes of transportation in urban areas (e.g., widening streets to improve automobile LOS can often be to the detriment of pedestrians), that continued reliance on automobiles is at odds with State objectives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (through reductions in vehicle miles of travel), and that mitigation for increased vehicle delay often involves measures which may increase auto use and discourage alternative forms of transportation. When employed in isolation, LOS can lead to ad hoc roadway expansions that deteriorate conditions on the network as a whole, or discourage transportation improvements that improve street function overall, by providing better level of service for vehicles, but decreasing service for transit, pedestrians, or bicycles. The proposed Pedestrian Action Plan is wholly consistent with the guidance in SB743 as it would reduce vehicle miles traveled, decrease associated air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions in the City, and improve pedestrian safety.

It should also be noted that implementation of the pedestrian projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be dependent on the availability of funding sources and would be subject to future environmental review on a case by case basis based on future



conditions. Therefore, impacts on the performance of the circulation system would be less than significant.

b) No Impact. Within Los Angeles County, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) administers the 2010 Congestion Management Plan (CMP), a state mandated program designed to address the impacts of urban congestion on local communities and the region as a whole. As required by State law, the 2010 CMP contains:

A system of highways and roadways with minimum levels of service performance measurements designated for highway segments and key roadway intersections on this system;

A performance element including performance measures to evaluate multimodal system performance;

A travel demand element promoting alternative transportation strategies;

A program to analyze the impacts of local land use decisions on the regional transportation system, including an estimate of the costs of mitigating those impacts;

A seven-year capital improvement program of projects that benefit the CMP system;

A deficiency plan.

Chapter 4 of the 2010 CMP contains the Transportation Demand Management Element. The CMP recognizes that TDM strategies are a key element of a countywide transportation program to reduce the magnitude of congestion problems within Los Angeles County. The CMP also recognizes that local land use decisions could affect the regional transportation system.

The Pedestrian Action Plan is important in the overall strategy of the CMP to reduce congestion in the region. The adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan would represent a TDM strategy and a local land use decision that would promote walking as an alternative means of transportation and reduce vehicular trips both locally and regionally. Therefore, the Pedestrian Action Plan would not conflict with the CMP. No impacts would occur.

a) No Impact. None of the policies, programs, and projects in the Pedestrian Action Plan would have a potential to affect airport traffic (the projects would occur on the existing street network). Therefore, no impacts would occur.

b) No Impact. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in impacts related to a hazardous design feature. Rather, the Pedestrian Action Plan is intended to improve pedestrian safety. The Plan includes Goal 1 “Vision Zero”, which states that the safety of people walking in Santa Monica is a shared responsibility. The Plan specifically aims to eliminate all preventable fatalities and server injuries from roadway collisions within the next 10 years. The Vision Zero policies promote continued monitoring of collision data, institutionalizing of pedestrian awareness programs, and exploration of safety design features to help minimize pedestrian/vehicle and pedestrian/bicycle conflicts. Furthermore, the infrastructure projects proposed in the Plan would improve pedestrian safety. These include crossing enhancements such as curb extensions and pedestrian refuge islands which are effective



collision reduction strategies, as they improve sight line distance, giving motorists more time to react and stop when they see pedestrians attempting to cross. Other measures that would create a safer pedestrian environment include pavement striping, wayfinding signage, pedestrian scale lighting, and signal improvements. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

a) No Impact. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the City’s Pedestrian Action Plan, which would support walking. As previously discussed, the Pedestrian Action Plan is consistent with the alternative transportation goals set forth in the LUCE, the Sustainability Plan, and the CMP. Furthermore, the Pedestrian Action Plan is consistent with the California Complete Streets Act of 2008 (AB1358) requiring circulation elements to accommodate the transportation system from a multi-modal perspective, including public transit, walking, and biking. Therefore, no impacts would occur.


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

XX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:

a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?

b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?

c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?

d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?

e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand, in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?

f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs?




Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

g) Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?

a through g) No Impact. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in impacts on the capacity of existing utilities. The policies, programs, and projects in the Pedestrian Action Plan are intended to promote walking and improve the pedestrian environment in the City. No increase in wastewater, water, stormwater, and solid waste generation would result as a result of the Plan. Therefore, no impacts would occur.


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE

a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild-life population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?

b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.

c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?

a) No Impact. As previously stated, the majority of the City of Santa Monica has been developed, paved, or landscaped, and is generally devoid of large expanses of habitat,



wetlands, and wildlife corridors that support sensitive species. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan, which would not have an impact on biological resources. Most of the actions proposed in the Pedestrian Action Plan (e.g., pedestrian awareness/promotional programs) would not result in physical impacts on the environment. In addition, the pedestrian projects that do involve physical improvements (e.g., walkway enhancements, crossing enhancements, operational improvements) are proposed on the City’s existing street network and thus, would not impact historic resources. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

b and c) No Impact. The proposed project consists of the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan. Adoption of the plan would not result in cumulative adverse impacts or adverse environmental effects on human beings. Implementation of the pedestrian projects identified in the Pedestrian Action Plan would be dependent on the availability of funding sources and would be subject to future environmental review on a case by case basis. Therefore, no impacts would occur.



REFERENCES

1) City of Santa Monica General Plan, Land Use and Circulation Element, 2010.

2) City of Santa Monica Land Use and Circulation Element, Final EIR, June 2010.

3) City of Santa Monica, Sustainability Plan, 1994 with last update October 2006.

4) City of Santa Monica Municipal Code, 2011.

5) California Division of Land Resource Protection, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, Los Angeles County Map; online at ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2008/los08.pdf; 2008.

6) California Scenic Highways Program, http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic_highways/scenic_hwy.htm; accessed May 19, 2011.

7) County of Los Angeles, Department of Regional Planning. 2008. Los Angeles County Draft General Plan – Figure 6.3 Significant Ecological Areas. http://planning.lacounty.gov/assets/upl/project/gp_maps-fig-6-3-significant-ecologicalareas.pdf.

8) Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Congestion Management Program, 2010.

9) United States Geological Survey, Beverly Hills Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series. 1995; California Department of Fish and Game. 2009. California Natural Diversity Database. May 30.

initial study-nd pedestrian action plan 2015 · 2015-11-24 · the “project”). the proposed...

Documents