inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity by tea tree oil and constituent terpenoids
TRANSCRIPT
INHIBITION OF ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE ACTIVITY 617
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Flavour Fragr. J. 2005; 20: 617–620
FLAVOUR AND FRAGRANCE JOURNALFlavour Fragr. J. 2005; 20: 617–620Published online 26 May 2005 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/ffj.1505
Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity by tea tree oiland constituent terpenoids
Mitsuo Miyazawa* and Chikako Yamafuji
Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kinki University, Kowakae, Higashiosakashi, Osaka577-8502, Japan
Received 10 January 2004; Revised 20 May 2004; Accepted 8 June 2004
ABSTRACT: In vitro inhibition of bovine erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase activity by tea tree oil was investigated. The
main constituents in the tea tree oil batch used for analysis of acetylcholinesterase inhibition were terpinen-4-ol (35.6%),
γγγγγ -terpinene (19.5%), ααααα-terpinene (8.3%), p-cymene (7.2%) and 1,8-cineole (4.4%). AChE was measured by a colorimetric
method. IC50 values were obtained for tea tree oil and ααααα-pinene and were 51.2 and 57.1 µµµµµg/ml, respectively. Tea tree
oil was found to comprise of mixed type inhibitors as the main constituents. The main constituents were competitive
inhibitors. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
KEY WORDS: acetylcholinesterase; tea tree oil; Melaleuca alternifolia; inhibitory activity, synergistic effect
* Correspondence to: M. Miyazawa, Department of Applied Chemistry,
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kinki University, Kowakae,
Higashiosaka-shi, Osaka 577-8502, Japan.
E-mail: [email protected]
Introduction
Australian tea tree oil, usually obtained from Melaleuca
alternifolia Cheel is becoming an increasingly important
commercial oil due to its biological activity. Tea tree
oil has powerful antiseptic properties1 and bactericidal
properties against a wide range of Gram-negative and
positive bacteria, yeast and fungi.2 It has also been used
in perfumes and cosmetics. The composition of tea tree
oil has been reported to be a mixture of terpenoids.1,3,4
The biological ativity has been found to be related to
terpinene-4-ol, the major component.5–7 It is of interest to
search for bioactive compounds from tea tree oil.
Reversible inhibitors of cholinesterase are currently
used in clinical trials examining the treatment of
Alzheimer’s disease. The treatment of Alzheimer’s dis-
ease was based on inhibition of the acetylcholinesterase
(AChE), which hydrolyses acetylcholine, increasing ace-
tylcholine available for transmission at the cholinergistic
synapse. Some acetylcholinesterase inhibitors have been
found to occur naturally in plants. Recently, galantamine,
an amaryllidaceae alkaloid, has shown effective results
for Alzheimer’s disease with good safety.8–11 The effects
of Salvia lavandulaefolia Vhal (Spanish sage) essential
oil and some of its constituent terpenoids on human
erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase have been reported
as well.12 In our previous paper, the inhibition of AChE
by monoterpenoids with a p-menthane skeleton,13 essen-
tial oils of Mentha species,14 volatile α,β-unsaturated
ketones15 and essential oil from Citrus paradisi16 were
reported.
As part of our continuing program to investigate AChE
inhibitory activity by fragrance components, we report
here the inhibition of AChE from bovine erythrocytes
by tea tree oil and a comparison of essential oil and
terpenoids as main components in the oils.
Materials and Methods
General procedure
Electron impact mass spectra (EI-MS) were obtained
by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
GC-MS was performed on a Hewlett-Packard 5972A
massselevtive detector (70 eV; ion source 180 °C) inter-
faced with a Hewlett-Packard 5890E Series II Plus gas
chromatograph fitted with a capillary column (TC-WAX,
60 m × 0.25 mm i.d.). Chromatographic conditions were
as follows: column temperature increased from 60 to
240 °C at 2 °C/min; injector temperature, 240 °C; detec-
tor temperature, 270 °C; carrier gas, He at 1.85 ml/min.
Materials
AChE from bovine erythrocytes was purchased from
Sigma Co., Ltd (Tokyo). 5, 5′-Dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic
acid) (DTNB) and acetylthiocholine iodide (ATC) were
perchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. Ltd (TCI).
618 M. MIYAZAWA AND C. YAMAFUJI
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Flavour Fragr. J. 2005; 20: 617–620
Tea tree oil
Tea tree oil was gifted from Yamamoto Perfumery
Co. Ltd (Osaka, Japan).
Terpenoids
Terpenoids were purchased from Fluka Co. (Tokyo,
Japan) and Shiono Koryo Kaisha Ltd (Osaka).
Preparatory solutions
AChE (0.04 units/mL) and ATC (75 mM) were dissolved
in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 8.0), respectively. DTNB
(0.01 M) was made up in 10 mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer
(pH 7.0) containing 15 mg of NaHCO3. Tea tree oil was
dissloved in ethanol. The final ethanol concentrations
in all assays were maintained at 5% (v/v), including
controls.
Inhibition of AChE Activity
Inhibition of AChE was assessed by the colorimetric
method of Ellman et al.17 Inhibitor solution (50 µL)
and AChE (0.5 mL) were mixed in a test tube, and
buffer (2.4 mL) was added to the tube. The tube was
preincubated at 25 °C for 5 min. The reaction was started
by adding ATC (40 µL) and the mixture was incubated
at 25 ° C for 20 min. The absorbance at 412 nm was
measured spectrophotometrically (Spectronic 20D, Milton
Roy Co., NY, USA), and all test and control (without
essential oil) assays were corrected by blanks for non-
enzymic hydrolysis. Each assay was run in triplicate, at
least.
Results and Discussion
As shown Table 1, the main consituents of tea tree oil
were terpinene-4-ol (35.6%), γ-terpinene (19.5%), α-
terpinene (8.3%), p-cymene (7.2%) and 1,8-cineole
(4.4%). Tea tree oil efficiently inhibited AChE act-
ivity, with an IC50 value of 51.2 µg/mL. This oil
was fractionated by SiO2 column chromatography with
pentane–diethylether and a hydrocarbon fraction and
an oxygen-containing fraction were obtained. However,
these fractions were less potent than tea tree oil (Table 2).
To clarity the cause of the inhibition effect of the tea tree
oil, the main terpenoids mentioned above were inves-
tigated. As shown in Table 2, the most potent of the
monoterpenoid inhibitors tested was 1,8-cineole, with an
IC50 value of 49.0 µg/mL. The other main terpenoids
showed identical inhibition of AChE at 50 µg/mL. How-
ever, these terpenoids were not as potent as tea tree oil
(Fig. 1). The concentration of each main component in
tea tree oil (100 µg/mL) was as follows; terpinene-4-ol
(35.6 µg/mL), γ-terpinene (19.5 µg/mL), α-terpinene
(8.3 µg/mL), p-cymene (7.2 µg/mL) and 1,8-cineole
(4.4 µg/mL). At this concentration, these components
showed slight inhbitory activity. Inhibitory activity of tea
tree oil can be considered to be not one strong inhibitor,
but synergistic activity in combination with each com-
ponent. To clarify the cause of the inhibitory effect of tea
tree oil, the synergistic effect of a mixture of the main
Table 1. Main components of tea tree oil
Compounds Peak areaa (%)
Terpinen-4-ol 35.6
γ -Terpinene 19.5
α-Terpinene 8.3
p-Cymene 7.2
1,8-Cineole 4.4
a Peak areas were quantified using a HP 3396 Series II integrator.
Table 2. Inhibition of AChE activity by tea tree oil,main terpenoids and mixture
Compounds IC50 (µg/mL)a or percentageinhibitory activity (50 µg/mL)b
Tea tree oil 51.2
Hydrocarbon fr. (33.3%)
Oxygen-containing fr. (25.5%)
Terpinen-4-ol (32.0%)
γ -Terpinene (31.7%)
α-Terpinene (34.0%)
p-Cymene (38.3%)
1,8-Cineole 49.0
Mixturec 65.5
a Concentration of compound (treatment) required for 50% enzyme inhibi-
tion as calculated from the dose–response curve.b The percentage AChE inhibition values (50 µg/mL) were calculated as
compared with control (without terpenoids) enzyme activity (assumed to be
0% inhibition).c Terpinen-4-ol:γ -terpinene:α-terpinene:p-cymene:1,8-cineole = 36:20:8:7:4.
Figure 1. Effect of tea tree oil, main terpenoids onAChE activity. The percentage enzyme activity valuesfor the inhibitors were calculated compared with thecontrol activity, assumed to be 100%: (�) tea treeoil; (�) terpinen-4-ol; (�) γ -terpinene; (�) α-terpinene;(�) p-cymene; (�) 1,8-cineole.
INHIBITION OF ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE ACTIVITY 619
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Flavour Fragr. J. 2005; 20: 617–620
terpenoids, a 36:20:8:7:4 mixture of terpinen-4-ol, γ -
terpinene, α-terpinene, p-cymene and 1,8-cineole, was
tested. This mixture showed a synergistic effect and the
IC50 value was 65.5 µg/mL. The inhibitory activity of
mixture was weaker than that of tea tree oil. However,
the inhibitory activity of the mixture was affected by the
main terpenoids.
The inhibition of AChE by tea tree oil may be more
potent than that of the primary monoterpenoid constitu-
ents (the mixture of the major constituents gave an
IC50 of 65.5 µg/mL whereas the IC50 of the whole oil
was 51.2 µg/mL). Although it is proposed that the
monoterpenoids act synergistically to inhibit AChE, the
possibility cannot be excluded that a minor, as yet uni-
dentified, constituent of the tea tree oil is more potent.
In conclusion, the inhibition of AChE by tea tree oil
is likely to be due to the presence of more than one
terpenoids present in tea tree oil, the main compounds
responsible being terpinen-4-ol, γ -terpinene, α-terpinene,
p-cymene and 1,8-cineole.
AChE inhibition kinetics
Tea tree oil showed mixed inhibition of AChE (by inter-
section on the Lineweaver–Burk plot). The inhibition
constant of tea tree oil was 54.7 µg/mL (by intersection
on the Dixon plot; Fig. 2). On the other hand, the
main terpenoids showed competitive inhibition of AChE
(Fig. 3). As shown in Fig. 4, 1,8-cineole, the most potent
main terpenoid tesed, was a competitive inhibitor, as
indicated by increasing inhibition associated with decreas-
ing substrate concentration and by the intersections on
the Dixon plots. The plots of the other main mono-
terpenoids tested were similar to that of 1,8-cineole.
These terpenoids and mixture compete with the substrate
for its active centre on the enzyme. The Ki values deter-
mined by the intersections in the Dixon plots are shown
in Table 3.
Figure 2. Lineweaver–Burk plots derived from theinhibition of AChE by tea tree oil. The concentrationsof inhibitor are: (�) no inhibitor; (�) 12.5 µg/mL; and(�) 50.0 µg/mL.
Figure 3. Lineweaver–Burk plots derived from theinhibition of AChE by mixture. The concentrationsof inhibitor are: (�) no inhibitor; (�) 12.5 µg/mL; and(�) 50.0 µg/mL.
From this study, it is expected that tea tree oil can be
used as an AChE antagonist, although it remains to be
determined whether the tea tree oil inhibited brain AChE
in vivo with relevant potency.
Acknowledgements—The authors thank Yamamoto Perfumery Co. Ltd(Osaka, Japan) for providing the tea tree oil. This work was supportedby ‘High-Tech Research Centre’ project for Private Universities: match-ing fund subsidy from MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,Science and Technology), 2004–2008.
Figure 4. Dixon plots derived from the inhibitionof AChE by 1,8-cineole. The concentrations of ATC are:(�) 0.163 mM; (�) 0.325 mM; and (�) 0.650 mM.
Table 3. Inhibition constants (Ki) for tea tree oil, mainterpenoids and mixture inhibition of AChE
Compounds Ki
Tea tree oil 54.7 (µg/mL)
Terpiene-4-ol 2.0 (mM)
γ -Terpinene 1.6 (mM)
α-Terpinene 0.8 (mM)
p-Cymene 1.5 (mM)
1,8-Cineole 0.1 (mM)
Mixturea 62.3 (µg/mL)
a Terpinen-4-ol:γ -terpinene:α-terpinene:p-cymene:1,8-cineole = 36:20:8:7:4.
620 M. MIYAZAWA AND C. YAMAFUJI
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Flavour Fragr. J. 2005; 20: 617–620
References
1. Laakso PV. Proceedings of the 25th Congress on Pharmaceutical
Science, 1965; 485–492.2. Altman PM. Aust. J. Pharm., 1988; 69: 276–278.3. Guenther E. Perfum. Essent. Oil Rec., 1968; 59: 642–644.4. Swords G, Hunter GLK. J. Agric. Food Chem., 1978; 26: 734–
737.5. Penfold AR, Grant R. J. Proc. R. Soc. NSW, 1925; 59: 346–
350.6. Southwell IA, Hayes AJ, Markham J, Leach DN. Acta Hort.,
1993; 344: 256–265.7. Carson CF, Riley TV. J. Appl. Bacteriol, 1995; 78: 264–269.8. Thomsen T, Kewitz H. Life Sci., 1990; 46: 1553–1558.9. Thomsen T, Zendeh B, Fisher JP, Kewitz H. Biochem. Pharmac.,
1991; 41: 139–141.
10. Bicket U, Thomsen T, Weber W, Fisher JP, Bacus R, Nitz M,Kewitz H. Clin. Pharmac. Ther., 1991; 50: 420–428.
11. Bores GM, Huger FP, Petko W, Mutlib AE, Camacho F, RushDK, Selk DE, Wolf V, Kosley RW, Davis L Jr, Vagas HM. J.
Pharmac. Exp. Ther., 1996; 277: 728–738.12. Perry SLN, Theobland A, Jenner P, Perry KE. J. Pharm.
Pharmac., 2000; 52: 895–902.13. Miyazawa M, Watanabe H, Kameoka H. J. Agric. Food Chem.,
1997; 45: 677–679.14. Miyazawa M, Watanabe H, Umemoto K, Kameoka H. J. Agric.
Food Chem., 1998; 46: 3431–3434.15. Miyazawa M, Kakiuchi A, Watanabe H, Kameoka H. Nat. Prod.
Lett., 1998; 12: 131–134.16. Miyazawa M, Tougo H, Ishihara M. Nat. Prod. Lett., 2001; 15:
205–210.17. Ellman GL, Coutney KD, Valentino C, Zarzuelo A Jr, Feathertone
RM. Biochem. Pharmac., 1961; 7: 88–95.