infrastructure financing in developing countries of africa
TRANSCRIPT
Infrastructure Financing in Developing Countries of Africa
2
1. Africa- The Emerging Growth Pole 2. Growing Infrastructure Needs
3. Infrastructure Financing
Structure of Presentation
Africa- The Emerging Growth Pole
4
IntroductionHighest Valued Exports Resource- Rich Continent
Rapidly increasing reservoir of human capital- 2.3 billion people projected for 2050
30% of the world known reserves of minerals; 10% of oil & 8% of gas resources
Largest cobalt, diamonds, platinum, and uranium reserves in the world
Mining, oil & gas account for 28% of the continent’s GDP
US$ 24 billion fisheries sector Home to highest annual rainfall; second largest
tropical forestEmerging as Global Economic Growth Pole Registered an average GDP growth of 4.2% p.a.
during the past decade- double the growth achieved by world as a whole
Growing Infrastructure Needs
6
EAP* SAR LAC SSA ECA MENA
87
309
141
58 62 533568
41 28 35 5252
241
100
30 271
RequirementsActualGap
Infrastructure Investment Requirement in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies (2014-20; Annual US$ bn)
Infrastructure Investment Gap
Actual; 259
Gap; 452
All Emerging Markets and Developing Economies (2014-
20; Annual US$ bn)
Note: EAP*: East Asia and Pacific (not including China); SAR: South Asia; LAC: Latin America and the Caribbean; SSA: Sub-Saharan Africa; ECA: Europe and Central Asia; MENA: Middle East and North Africa
Source: Ruiz Nunez, Fernanda and Wei, Zichao, Infrastructure Investment Demands in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies (September 17, 2015). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7414
In Emerging Markets and Developing Economies (excluding China), US$ 711 billion per year over the period 2014–20 is required to satisfy new infrastructure demand while maintaining service for existing infrastructure
Annual infrastructure investment gap is US$ 452 billion per year; requires doubling of current spending
Half of the spending needs to be allocated to maintenance of existing assets
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING NEEDS IN AFRICA
Infrastructure Deficit in AfricaIn
fras
truc
ture
Nee
ds (9
3.3)
Spen
ding
(4
5.3)
Infr
astr
uctu
re G
ap (4
8)
(17.
4)
(30.
6)
Optimizations
Optimized Gap
Opportunity for PPPsSource: World Bank
POTENTIAL FOR INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENTSub-Saharan Africa World
Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people), 2013
66.0 93.1
Improved water source (% of population with access), 2012
64.4 89.3
Energy use (kg of oil equivalent per capita), 2011
680.6 1890.1
Quality of port infrastructure, WEF (1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards)
3.5 4.1
Access to electricity (% of population), 2010
31.8 83.1
Source: World Bank
Only one in three rural Africans have access to an all-season road
Many African countries face chronic power deficit Ports efficiency can be enhanced significantly
Potential for improvement in healthcare infrastructure and delivery
Transportation costs increase prices of African goods by 75%
Water resources are underutilized
8
Infrastructure Deficit in Africa: PowerPower-generation Potential for Select SSA
countries by Technology
1 Potential from domestic resources only; gas includes all conventional proven/speculative reserves, and hydro includes all technically exploitable potential. 2 Democratic Republic of the Congo.Source: McKinsey and Company Research
Africa has 13% of the world’s population, but 48% of the global population without access to electricity
Only seven countries- Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Gabon, Ghana, Namibia, Senegal and South Africa- have electricity access rates exceeding 50%
Rich in potential power-generating capacity. Excluding solar, there is an estimated 1.2 terawatts of capacity. Solar can deliver about 11 terawatts
To meet energy demand in Africa by 2040: US$ 43 billion of annual capital investment required [Of that, US$ 5.4 billion for transmission (regional interconnectors)]
Current annual investment in Africa energy projects- less than US$ 5 billion.
Region’s cost-effective energy resources too distant from major centres of demand
Regional Grids could save US$ 33 billion per year - roughly (17%) in power generation costs
Infrastructure Deficit in Africa: HealthcareGENERAL GOVERNMENT HEALTH EXPENDITURE AS
% OF GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE, 2012
Source: WHO
Large part of health problem can only be addressed by effective government actions
Trend in Africa is to increase funds available for private, pooled healthcare by encouraging health insurance schemes
Pooled private spending best represented in South Africa
Addressing medical needs require combining direct Govt. expenditure with other financing models
Govt. financing the administrative side of healthcare- leaving some projects to external donors, and an increasing share of healthcare delivery to private sector
When funding healthcare, govt. preferring to pay into health insurance schemes
Expertise of Indian private sector in pharmaceuticals and healthcare delivery can create win-win outcomes
9
10
Infrastructure Deficit in Africa: Transportation Only South Africa, Morocco, Malawi & Egypt performed better in trade & transport related
infrastructure index than global avg It costs US$ 2,930.9 mn per container and 37.6 days to import in Sub-Saharan Africa- the
highest among all regions Port efficiency and performance needs significant improvement through additional investments Spending needs for the road sector amount to around US$ 9.6 billion a year, skewed towards
capital expenditure Restoring Africa’s aging rail networks to good operating condition requires a one-time
rehabilitation efforts of US$3 billion
South
Af...
Moroc
co
MalawiEg
ypt
Ghana
Liber
ia
Namibi
a
Nigeria
Algeria
Maurit
ius
Sierra
L...
Cote d'
Iv...
Kenya
Burund
i
Maurit
aniaBen
in
Leso
tho
Burkina
...Cha
d
Rwanda
Tanz
ania
Zambia
Sene
gal
Tunis
iaLib
ya
Zimba
bwe
Botswan
aMali
Ethiop
ia
Mozam
b...
Madag
a...
Angola
Guinea
Gabon
GambiaHait
i
Camer
oon
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.5 Quality of Trade and Transport-related Infrastructure
(1=low to 5=high) World Average : 2.8
Infrastructure Financing
Infrastructure Financing: Key Characteristics
12
Positive Indirect Externalities to Economies Such benefits fundamentally difficult to measure Even if measured, charging for them may not be feasible or
desirable
Often Comprises Natural Monopolies Governments want to retain ultimate control to prevent
abuse of monopoly power Requires complex legal arrangements to ascertain
allocation of pay-offs and risk-sharing, thereby aligning the incentives of all parties
Purely Private Investment Difficult and Costly Time profile of cash flows High initial risks Illiquidity
Presence of Externalities
Natural Monopolies
Pvt. Investment Difficult
Infrastructure Financing : Options
Domestic investorsPublic utility
Dedicated government fundsInstitutional investors
Foreign investorsEquipment suppliers (in
collaboration with domestic and international developers)
Dedicated infrastructure fundsOther international equity
investors
Domestic commercial banksDomestic term lending
institutionsDomestic bond markets
Specialized infrastructure financing options such as infrastructure debt funds
International commercial banksExport credit agencies
International bond marketsMultilateral agencies (financing with development perspectives
and in long tenors)
EQU
ITY
DEB
T
DOMESTIC SOURCES EXTERNAL SOURCES
Infrastructure Financing : Key Issues
14
Infrastructure projects are long gestation, and long term projects Project exporters may face challenges securing funds from offshore
channels to fund their overseas investments or refinance their offshore debt
Cross border lending for infrastructure projects is in foreign currencies: hedging for the currency risk comes with a cost and may not be available for long tenors in all currencies
Several ways of mitigating currency risks: political risk insurance; currency swaps; offshore reserve accounts
Lending in currency of lenders is an option; however, this may be a challenge for the borrower (hedging is again difficult)
Infrastructure Financing : PPP Models
15
Public budgets have traditionally been the largest contributor of infrastructure finance in the developing world However, Governments are increasingly facing challenges in managing their budget.
MDBs finance only about 10% of the developing world’s infra investments or 5% of total needs
Need for supplementing traditional sources of finance with new sources of equity and debt finance; New MDBs like NDB and AIIB likely to play a significant role in infra financing space Investment fund by ADB and Japan to support “sustainable” infrastructure development in
the region Innovative tools, such as ECA guarantees, to reduce risks, lower cost of sovereign
borrowing Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) represent one of the many promising
instruments to meet the challenge of crowding in finance in the infrastructure space. Enables public sector to harness the expertise and efficiencies of the private sector PPP lowers the risk of the private players as compared to their independent venture in
such projects
Role of Export Credit Agencies (ECAs) in Infrastructure Financing
Large scale infrastructure projects in developing countries in the energy, resources and port sectors continue to look to ECAs to supplement and facilitate finance due to
insufficient liquidity in the local market for commercial banks to fund all of the debt (covered or uncovered); add o it the asset-liability mismatch
the long lifespan of projects; potential political or economic risks
ECAs provide financing support that helps restore investor confidence and facilitate investment in high impact areas like infrastructure development
Given their status as quasi-governmental institutions, the cost of borrowing, capital reserves and return expectations for most ECAs is lower than that of commercial lenders – meaning that cost savings are often passed on to borrowers
ECAs can also provide ‘soft support’ through their intra-government relationships, political knowledge, diplomatic goodwill and reputational strength
ECA support generally entails that materials, machines and sometimes even labour for infrastructure projects are bought from their home jurisdictions creating win-win outcomes 16
17
Thank you!