information literacy
DESCRIPTION
Information Literacy. Collaborations. Some Numbers. Student population (Headcount 2009/10) 36,000 Total enrolment 25,500 Undergraduate Students 2,100 Graduate Students (Master’s/Doctoral) 8,500 Continuing Education Students - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Information Literacy
Collaborations
Some Numbers
Student population (Headcount 2009/10)36,000 Total enrolment
• 25,500 Undergraduate Students• 2,100 Graduate Students (Master’s/Doctoral)• 8,500 Continuing Education Students
Source: Ryerson University Planning Office. http://www.ryerson.ca/upo/
Library Instruction Statistics 2006-2011
56% increase in number of students taught since 2006
(2011) We’re reaching ~40% of the total number of students (36,000 headcount) through instruction
(excluding service provided through the Reference Desk, VR, online tutorials, one-on-one help)
(~25 librarians)
Types of Instruction Offered• In-class Sessions• Drop-in Sessions• One-on-One Sessions• Online Tools: – Podcast library tour– Database tutorials– Short videos (“Ryerson Research Minutes”)– Blackboard integration (More on this later)– Course-specific tutorials. More on this later
• http://www.ryerson.ca/library/tutorials/index.html
Library Presence in the University (Teaching)
• Senate Learning and Teaching Committee – Librarian presence for 10+ years
• Ryerson Learning and Teaching Office: Workshops, committees, conference planning, etc.
• Ryerson Academic Integrity Committee• Librarians very active in the annual Faculty
Conference (planning and presenting)• Faculty Teaching Chairs
Faculty Teaching Chairs
• Established by the Provost in August 2010 • Promote best practices in teaching in the
university (professional development programs, workshops, presentation, surveys, etc.)
• 7 Faculty Teaching Chairs (including 1 Library Teaching Chair)
• Each Teaching Chair chairs a Learning and Teaching Committee within their faculty [Library]
Faculty Teaching Chairs Model
Library Learning and Teaching Committee and the Teaching Chairs
• Provides a mechanism by which the library has a seat at each Faculty Learning and Teaching Committee
• Greater exposure for the library: L&T Committees provide a conduit for introducing and promoting new library initiatives, projects, faculty workshops, collaborative efforts (assignment design, IL integration, etc.) into faculties and departments
• A chance to reach faculties that have been low library users, e.g. Engineering and Science.
Projects (Library L&T Committee) 2011
• Workshop for faculty on creating effective assignments
• Workshop for faculty on publishing, journal impact factors, open access publishing and the Digital Commons.
• Development of online information literacy tutorials in collaboration with faculty. RE:Search Online Information Literacy Tutorials … (later)
Library/Course Integrated Initiatives
• BUS 100 • Interior Design• Social Sciences and Humanities• Arts and Contemporary Studies
Library/Course Integrated Initiatives (cont’d)
• ACS 102 (Arts & Contemporary Studies) Foundation Course for all incoming Arts students
• Librarians worked with professor in developing course content, delivering lectures, leading tutorials, creating assessment tools, providing office hours.
• Full integration of library content into course—followed ACRL Info Lit Standards.
• Librarian present at every lecture and tutorial. First class held in Library.
• Pre-test and post-tests administered. • 26-question assessment tool based on the 5 ACRL
Information Literacy Standards– 1st test. Before course started. – 2nd test End of course. – 3rd. Test 6 months after course ended
(Did students retain skills learned?)
Findings: Information literacy skills increased significantly over the length of the course and most students retained the skills 6 months later.
Reed, M. J., Kinder, D., & Farnum C. (2007). Collaboration between librarians and faculty to teach information literacy at one Ontario university: Experiences and outcomes. Journal of Information Literacy, 1(3), 29-46.
BUS 100 Interior Design
RE:Search Online Tutorial System
• A Web-based tool for creating information literacy tutorials
• Developed by a team of librarians at the University of Toronto in collaboration with interested faculty members.
• Tutorials are created through collaboration between librarian and course instructor
• Designed to cater to research needs at the course level. • Allows professors and librarians to create content,
exercises and feedback tailored to course content
RE:Search Cont’d
• Structured to present a framework for scaffolded learning and to develop mastery of basic concepts and advanced processes in research and writing
• Ryerson is partnering with UT in creating modules to add to the pool.
• Modules can taken and adapted for other courses (UT and Ryerson)
RE:Search Cont’d
5 modules based on Information Literacy Standards and the learning objectives of Bloom’s Taxonomy:
[Knowledge-Comprehension-Application-Analysis-Synthesis-Evaluation]
Must start with a research model relevant to the course: e.g.– PICO (Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome) – 5Ws+H (Who/What/Where/When/Why/How)– SRO/Systems Research Organizing
(Context/Client/Intervention/Outcomes)
– All tutorial content created must reflect the selected model– Have piloted the project with a Graduate (Master’s) Nursing Informatics
course. – Will be promoting it to the faculties (through the Faculty Teaching
Chairs/Committees) in the fall. – Business faculty is very interested, as is Engineering and Science
RE:Search Tutorials listing:
http://webapps.utsc.utoronto.ca/itcdf/start.php
MN8932 (Nursing Informatics)
+35 more
• Benefits– Tailored to course content– Collaboration with faculty in developing tutorial– Excellent resource for distance education students– Easy interface, content can be changed/added– Students get feedback, can work at their own pace
Embedding Library Resources into Blackboard
• Working on research guide content at the subject or course level to embed it into the course management system (Blackboard)
• Created a Blackboard building block that Faculty members can add to their course shells– automatically links data based on the course code
• Can create generic items at the subject level (e.g. NUR, for nursing) or we can get very specific, to a specific course, year and section
• Can tailor content to assignments: suggested databases, search strategies, etc.