inferred leaf senescence of rice crop and its relationship with grain yield

8
PHOTONIRVACHAK Jour.lnd.SocoPhoto-lnt. & Remote sensin~j Vol. 13 No. 1, 1985 INFERRED LEAF SENESCENCE OF RICE CROP AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WitH GRAIN YIE! D P.P. Nageswara Rao ISRO Headquarters, Bangalore M.V. Krishna Rao and R.S. Ayyangat National Remote Sensing Agency, Hyderabad ABSTRACT The possibility of detecting change in green cover of rice crop and its relationship with the grain yield was studied using the spectral data collected by an airborne scanner. The spect t,al data in th~ form of difference in vegetation index over a 35 day interval, from the time of flowering~ was observed to show good relationship between change of green cover (a measure of degree of senescence) and grain yield. INTRODUCTION Leaf senescence is one of the critical physiological processes that determines the leaf duration. Developmental changes leading to the formation of grains induce competitior, between the mature leaves and the growing shoot resulting in senescence. However, the degree of senescence depends on the genotype and abnormal crop- soil-atmospheric conditions. One of the observable symptoms of teaf senescence is the selec- tive break down of chlorophylls (Sanger, 1971). Among chlorophylls, chlorophyll "a" is more rapidly destroyed than chlorophyll "b" (Wool- house, 1974). Thus change in chlorophyll content of a leaf during the later stages of a cereal crop can be taken as a mebsure to assess the degree of senescence. Many investigators observed close relation- ship between various indicies of senescence, namely~ decline in protein content, photosynthetic rate and ribulose diphosphate carboxylase protein content and its activity and the decline in chlorophyll content (Hall et alo, 19787 Wittenbach et. al., 1980)o

Upload: p-p-nageswara-rao

Post on 25-Aug-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Inferred leaf senescence of rice crop and its relationship with grain yield

P H O T O N I R V A C H A K

J o u r . l n d . S o c o P h o t o - l n t . & R e m o t e sensin~j Vo l . 13 No. 1, 1985

I N F E R R E D L E A F S E N E S C E N C E OF R I C E C R O P A N D ITS R E L A T I O N S H I P W i t H G R A I N Y IE ! D

P.P. N a g e s w a r a Rao ISRO H e a d q u a r t e r s , B a n g a l o r e

M .V . K r i s h n a Rao and R.S. A y y a n g a t N a t i o n a l R e m o t e Sensing A g e n c y , H y d e r a b a d

ABSTRACT

The p o s s i b i l i t y of d e t e c t i n g change in g reen c o v e r of r i ce c rop and i t s r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h the g ra i n y i e l d was s t u d i e d us ing the s p e c t r a l da ta c o l l e c t e d by an a i r b o r n e s c a n n e r . The spec t t,al da ta in th~ f o rm of d i f f e r e n c e in v e g e t a t i o n i ndex over a 35 day i n t e r v a l , f r o m the t i m e of f l o w e r i n g ~ was obse rved to show good r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n change of g reen c o v e r (a measure of degree of senescence ) and g ra in y i e l d .

I N T R O D U C T I O N

Lea f senescence is one of the c r i t i c a l p h y s i o l o g i c a l processes t h a t d e t e r m i n e s the l ea f d u r a t i o n . D e v e l o p m e n t a l changes l ead ing to the f o r m a t i o n of g ra ins i n d u c e c o m p e t i t i o r , b e t w e e n the m a t u r e l eaves and the g r o w i n g shoot r e s u l t i n g in senescence . H o w e v e r , the deg ree of senescence depends on the g e n o t y p e and a b n o r m a l c r o p - s o i l - a t m o s p h e r i c c o n d i t i o n s .

One of the o b s e r v a b l e s y m p t o m s of tea f senescence is the se lec - t i v e b reak d o w n of c h l o r o p h y l l s (Sanger , 1971). A m o n g c h l o r o p h y l l s , c h l o r o p h y l l "a" is more r a p i d l y d e s t r o y e d than c h l o r o p h y l l "b" (Woo l - house, 1974). Thus change in c h l o r o p h y l l c o n t e n t of a l ea f d u r i n g the l a t e r s tages of a ce rea l c rop can be t aken as a mebsure to assess the deg ree of s e n e s c e n c e . M a n y i n v e s t i g a t o r s obse rved c lose r e l a t i o n - sh ip b e t w e e n v a r i o u s i n d i c i e s of senescence , name ly~ d e c l i n e in p r o t e i n c o n t e n t , p h o t o s y n t h e t i c ra te and r i bu l ose d i p h o s p h a t e c a r b o x y l a s e p r o t e i n c o n t e n t and i ts a c t i v i t y and the d e c l i n e in c h l o r o p h y l l c o n t e n t ( H a l l et alo, 19787 W i t t e n b a c h e t . a l . , 1980)o

Page 2: Inferred leaf senescence of rice crop and its relationship with grain yield

2 P.P. N a g e s w a r a Rao, M.V. K r i s h n a Rao & R.S. A y y a n g a r

Wi th the d e v e l o p m e n t of r e m o t e sens ing t e c h n i q u e s , many i n v e s t i -

g a t o r s have a t t e m p t e d to r e l a t e r e m o t e sens ing da ta w i t h y i e l d i n d i - c a t i n g p a r a m e t e r s l i ke l e a f a rea index~ c a n o p y t e m p e r a t u r e , senescence

r a t e , e tc . fo r e s t i m a t i o n of c rop y ie lds (Bauer, 1975; Idso e t . a l . , 1977, Wiegand e t . a l . , 1979, T u c k e r e t . a l . , 1980, Idso e t . a l . , 1980). N a g a r a i a n e t . a l . (1984) used a vegeta t~ ion i n d e x d i f f e r e n c e t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s i m i l a r to t h a t e m p l o y e d by Ne lson (1983) fo r d e t e c t i o n of w h e a t rust d isease f r o m L a n d s a t d a t a . In the p r e s e n t s tudy , an a t t e m p t is made to

use the t r a n s f o r m e d v e g e t a t i o n i ndex d i f f e r e n c e to i n f e r the deg ree of senescence of r i ce c rop and i ts e f f e c t on g ra i n y i e l d .

M E T H O D O L O G Y

The e x p e r i m e n t was c o n d u c t e d in the M a n d y a d i s t r i c t o f K a r n a - t a k a 5 t a r e w h e r e r i ce c rop is one of the ma jo r i r r i g a t e d crops in the Rab i season. The study a rea c o v e r e d abou t 15 square k i l o m e t e r s h a v i n g n u m e r o u s f i e l d s of v a r i o u s s izes r a n g i n g f r o m 0.8 to 1,0 h e c t a r e . Range of o b s e r v a b l e senescence in t e r m s of c rop g reenness and g r a i n

y i e l d wre o b t a i n e d as a f u n c t i o n of p e r c e n t change in g reen c o v e r per f i e l d . S p e c t r a l da ta we re c o l l e c t e d by an e l e v e n c h a n n e l M o d u l a r

M u l t i s p e c t r a l Scanner on t w o da tes one i m m e d i a t e l y a f t e r the b o o t i n g s tage of r i ce c rop and the o t h e r at the g ra in f i l l i n g s tage , Out of

the t w o red bands a v a i l a b l e in the scanner (0 .620 - 0 .660 um and 0.660 - 0 .700 urn), the s p e c t r a l da ta of 0 .660 - 0 .700 um band w h i c h

is mo re s e n s i t i v e to c h o l o r p h y l l " a " a b s o r p t i o n was u t i l i z e d in the s tudy . The s p e c t r a l da ta of i n f r a r e d band (0 ,770 - 0 .860 urn) was

also i n c l u d e d in the s tudy because Tucke r and M a x w e l l (1976) and A y y a n g a r e t , a l . (1980) have f ound th is s p e c t r a l r e g i o n to be ve ry use fu l fo r v e g e t a t i o n m o n i t o r i n g , The scanner was o p e r a t e d w i t h an i n s t a n t a n e o u s f i e l d of v i e w of 2.5 m i l l i r a d i a n s at an a l t i t u d e of

abou t 1000 m e t e r s above the g r o u n d l e v e l .

f he s p e c t r a l da ta c o l l e c t e d on a h igh d e n s i t y d i g i t a l tape was t r a n s f e r r e d to a c o m p u t e r c o m p a t i b l e tape for f u r t h e r ana lys i s on the m u l t i s p e c t r a i da ta ana l ys i s sys tem ( M - D A S ) . E s t i m a t e d p e r c e n t

g reen cove r f o r m e d the ma in g r o u n d r e f e r e n c e da ta . A f t e r the ana lys i s the s p e c t r a l d a t a ( M - D A S mean coun ts ) of the red (sd R) and i n f r a r e d (sd IR) bands w e r e used in the c a l c u l a t i o n ,of a t r a n s f o r m e d v e g e t a t i o n

i ndex (TV l ) s i m i l a r to t h a t of Rouse e t . a l . (1975):

= 0.5] 1/2 TVI [(sd IR - sd R) / (sd IR + sd R) +

This t r a n s f o r m a t i o n of two a d j a c e n t bands ( red and near i n f r a r e d ) n,nr m,~l izes the s u n - t a r g e t - s e n s o r g e o m e t r y i n d u c e d changes in the

Page 3: Inferred leaf senescence of rice crop and its relationship with grain yield

i n f e r r e d L e a f Senescence of R ice Crop )

r e f l e c t e d r a d i a t i o n observed on t w o d i f f e r e n t da tes ( T u c k e r e t . a l . , 1979). The d i f f e r e n c e in TVI f r o m the t i m e of f l o w e r i n g to the end of g ra in f i l l i n g s tages of r i ce c rop ( i .e . Over a t i m e i n t e r v a l of 35 days) was t a k e n as a measu re of change in g reenness , i .e . the degree of senescence .

Gra in y i e l ds we re measu red f r o m a min i~num of six r a n d o m l y s e l e c t e d one square m e t e r s a m p l i n g un i t s in each r i ce f i e l d . F rom these un i t s a l l the pan i c l es were c o l l e c t e d and g ra ins we re s e p a r a t e d i n to u n f i l l e d and f i l l e d g ra ins . M o i s t u r e c o n t e n t of the g ra ins was d e t e r m i n e d and the f i n a l g ra in y i e l d ( m e t r i c tons per h e c t a r e ) was c a l c u l a t e d ( Y o s h i d a eL.e l . , 1976).

R E S U L T S A N D D I S C U S S I O N

Change in g reen c o v e r , s p e c t r a l da ta ( M - D A S mean counts ) , d i f f e r e n c e in TVI and g ra in y i e l d are p r e s e n t e d in T a b l e - I . N e g a t i v e c o r r e l a t i o n was obse rved (F ig . 1) b e t w e e n r i ce crop g ra in y i e l d and the degree of senescence exp ressed in t e r m s of the d i f f e r e n c e in TVI over a ]5 day i n t e r v a l f r o m the t i m e of f l o w e r i n g (r = -0 .96) . The obse rved r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n the g ra in y i e l d and senescence cou ld be a t t r i b u t e d to the high s e n s i t i v i t y of the red band, used in the s p e c t r a l t r a n s f o r m a t i o n , to the a m o u n t of c h l o r o p h y l l ( B e n d i c t and S w i d l e r , 1761; K n i p l i n g , 1970; Gausman e t . a l . , 1975 and Tucke r , 1979) p resen t in the r i ce c rop du r i ng senescence . The g r e a t e r dec rease in s p e c t r a l r a t i o i n d i c a t e s a g r e a t e r d e c l i n e in c h l o r o p h y l l c o n c e n t r a - t i on end t h e r e f o r e , more canopy senescence .

i t is d e s i r a b l e t h a t most of the c e r e a l c rops r e m a i n g reen fo r l onger t i m e in the l a t e r s tages of t h e i r l i f e c y c l e so t h a t t hey can s y n t h e s i z e and t r a n s l o c a t e the p h o t o s y n t h a t e to the g ra i n . H o w - e v e r , in r e a l i t y t h i s does not happen due to s e v e r a l f a c t o r s . Bes ides g e n e t i c v a r i a b i l i t y , any of the c o n d i t i o n s r e l a t e d to n u t r i t i o n a l a v a i l - a b i l i t y and w a t e r a v a i l a b i l i t y l e a d i n g to crop s t ress can also i m p a i r the p h y s i o l o g i c a l ba l ance and a g g r e v a t e l ea f senescence . This in t u rn may d e p r i v e the crop f r o m a c c u m u l a t i n g s u f f i c i e n t a m o u n t of c a r b o h y d r a t e s w i t h a consequen t r e d u c t i o n in g ra in y i e l d . The o b s e r v a - t i on made in t h i s s t udy , i . e . t the i n v e r s e r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n sene- scence and the r i ce g ra in y i e l d f u r t h e r s u b s t a n t i a t e the w o r k o! A l l i s o n

t (1964) on w h e a t and m a i z e and A b u - S h a k r a eL.e l . (197B) on soybean n e n o t y p e s w i t h d e l a y e d senescence .

Page 4: Inferred leaf senescence of rice crop and its relationship with grain yield

b, P.P. Nageswara Rao, M.V. Kr ishna Rao & R.S. Ayyangar 4

CONCLUSIONS

The re la t i onsh ip observed between spec t ra l data and degree of senescence ind ica tes the p o t e n t i a l use o'f the remote sensing data as one of the ind ices of assessing crop y ie ld . This study using a i rborne scanner data is only the begin ing and more studies are requ i red in th is d i r ec t i on to br ing such studies to opera t iona l leve l using s a t e l l i t e

data.

A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S

The authors wish t o express the i r deep sense of app rec ia t i on to the D i r e c t o r , NRSA for p rov id ing necessary f a c i l i t i e s . Authors thank the Research F l igh t F a c i l i t i e s of NRSA for col lect ing the spec- t ra l data . The help rendered by Mr. S.S. Budwal and Mr. K. Damodaran dur ing the f i e l d observa t ions is also g r a t e f u l t y acknowledged. Special thanks are due to Or. C.J. Tucker of NASA/Goddard Space F l igh t Cent re , Greenbelt~ Mary land for his encouraging suggest ions.

R E F E R E N C E S

Abu-Shakara, S.S., Ph i l l i ps , D.A. and Hu f f ake r , R.C. 1978, N i t rogen f i x a t i o n and delayed leaf senescence in Soybeans. Science V.1991 P. 973-975.

A l l i son , J.C.S., 1964, A compar ison between maize and wheat in respect of lea f area a f t e r f l owe r i ng and grain g rowth . Jour, Agr i c . Sci. V.63, P. 1-4.

Ayyangar , R.S., Nageswara Rao, P.P., and Rao K.R. 1980 Crop cover and crop pheno log ica l i n f o r m a t i o n f rom red and i n f ra red spec t ra l responses. Pho ton i r vachak , -]our. Ind. Soc. Pho to - In t . and Remote Sensing V.8, P. 2) -29.

Bauer, M.E., 1975. The role of remote sensing in de te rm in i ng the d i s t r i b u t i o n and y ie ld of crops. Adv. Agron., V.27, P. 272-304.

Bend ic t , H.M., and Swid ler , R. 1961. Nondes t ruc t i ve method of es t i - mat ing ch lo rophy l l contents of leaves. Science, V.133, P.

2015-2016.

Page 5: Inferred leaf senescence of rice crop and its relationship with grain yield

I n f e r red Leaf Senescence of Rice Crop 5

Gausman, H.W., Gerba rman , A .H. , and Wiegand, C.L. 1975 Use of ERTS - 1 to d e t e c t o h l o r o t i c gra in sorghum. P h o t a g r a m . E n g . and R e m o t e Sensing, V.41, P. 177 -18 ] .

Ha l l , N.P., Keya, A.V. and M e r r e t t , M.V., 1978. Ribulose t ,5 -d iphos - phate ca rboxy l ase p ro te in dur ing f lag leaf senescence. J. Exp. Bot. , V.29, P. 31-37.

Idso, S.B., Jackson, R.D. and Reg ina to , R.J. 1977 of crop y ie lds . Sc ience, V.196, P. 19-25.

Remote Sensing

Idso, S.B., P i n t e r , P.J. , Jr., Jackson, R.D. ; and Reg in to , R . I . , 1980. E s t i m a t i o n of gra in y ie ld by r e m o t e sensing of crop senescence ra tes. R e m o t e Sensing of e n v i r o n m e n t . V.9, P. 87-91.

Kn ip l i ng , E.B. 1970, Phys ica l and phys io log i ca l basis for the r e f l e c t a n c e of v is ib le and near i n f r a r e d rad ia t i on f rom v e g e t a t i o n . Remote Sensing of env i ron . V.1, P. 155-159.

Nagara jan , S., Sash ikumar , M.N. , A ja i and K a m a t , D.S. 1984, D e t e c t i o n of whea t rust diesease f rom Landsat mu l t i spe .c t ra l data . p /oc . seminar on Crop Growl:h Cond i t i ons and R e m o t e Sensing, June 22-23, IAR I , New D e l h i .

Nelson, R.F. 1983. D e t e c t i n g fo res t canopy change due to insect a c t i v i t y using Landsat MSS.Pho togram m e t r i c Eng inee r ing and R e m o t e Sensing, V.49, P. 1303-1314.

Rouse, ~ J.W. Jr. , Haas, R.H. Schel l , , l .A. and Dee t i ng D.W. 1974, M o n i t o r i n g v e g e t a t i o n sys tems in the Grea t Plains w i th ERTS. Thi rd Sympos ium on s i g n i f i c a n t resu l ts ob ta ined w i th E R T S - I . NASA 5P-351, P. 309-317.

Sanger, J.E. 1971, O u a n t i t i v e i nves t i ga t i ons of leaf p igmen ts f rom the i r i n c e p t i o n in buds th rough au tumn c o l o r a t i o n to d e c o m p o - s i t i o n in f a l l l ng leaves. Eco logy , V.52, P. 1075-1089.

Tucker , C.J. 1979. Red and pho tog raph i c i n f r a red l inear comb ina t i ons for m o n i t o r i n g v e g e t a t i o n . Remote Sensing of e n v i r o n m e n t ,

V.8, P. 127-150.

Tucker C.J., Elg in .1.H. Jr., M c M u r t r e y III, J.E. and Fan C.J. 1979. M o n i t o r i n g corn and soybean crop d e v e l o p m e n t w i th hand-he ld r a d i o m e t e r spec t ra l da ta . Remote Sensing of E n v i r o n m e n t , V.8, P. 237-248.

Page 6: Inferred leaf senescence of rice crop and its relationship with grain yield

6 P.P. Nageswara Rao, M.V. Krishna Rao & R.5. Ayyangar

Tucker , C.J., Holben, B.N., Elgin, I .H. , Jr., and McMur t rey , i .E., 1980. Relat ionship of spectral data to grain yield var iat ion, Photogramm. Eng. and Remote Sensing, V.b,6, P. 657-666.

Tucker, C. ] . , and Maxwel l , E.L. 1976. Sensor design for monitor ing vegetat ion canop!es. Photogram. Eng. and remote sensing V.42, P. 1399-1410,

Weigand, C.L., Richardson, A.J. and Kanemasu, E.T., 1979. Leaf area index est imates for wheat from Landsat and their impl i - cation for evapotranspi rat ion and crop modell ing. Agron. ] . , V.71, P. 336-342.

Wittenbach, V.A., Ackerson, R.C., Giaquinta, R.T. and Hebert, R.R. 1980. Changes in photosynthesis, Ribulose biphosphate carboxy- lase, p ro teo ly t i c ac t i v i t y and u l t ras t ruc ture of soybean leaves during senescence. Crop.Sci. V.20, P. 225-231.

Woolhouse H.W., 1974. Longevi ty and senescence. Plants. 5ci. Prog. V.61, P. 123-147.

Yoshida, S., Forno, D.A., Cock, J.H. and Gemez, K.A., 1976. Labora- tory manual for physiological studies of rice (Third Edition) In ternat iona l Rice. Res. Inst. Los Benos, Laguna, Phi l l ipines.

Page 7: Inferred leaf senescence of rice crop and its relationship with grain yield

12

10 c'-

0

"10 --- 8 .e_

.E

6

=11.5- 3/~.2 X r= -0 .96

-.02 .02 .06 .10 .14 Difference in vegetation index

Fig.,1. Relationship of rice crop grain yield and inferred leaf senescence(A TV! from flowering to grainfitl ing stage)

Page 8: Inferred leaf senescence of rice crop and its relationship with grain yield

TA

BL

E-1

:M

-DA

Sm

ean

co

un

tsfo

rin

frare

dan

dre

db

an

ds

an

dT

VI

for

flo

weri

ng

an

dg

rain

fill

ing

sta

ges

of

rice,

ch

an

ge

ing

reen

co

ver,

dif

fere

nce

inT

VI

an

dg

rain

yie

ld.

Flo

weri

ng

Sta

ge

Gra

infi

llin

gsta

ge

Can

op

ych

an

ge

.AT

VI

Gra

in*

Infr

are

dR

ed

TV

IIn

frare

dR

ed

TV

Ifr

om

gre

en

toY

ield

(0.7

70

-(0

.66

0-

(0.7

70

-(0

.66

0-

yell

ow

on(T

!ha)

0.8

60

0.7

00

0.8

60

0.7

00

urn

)u

rn)

urn

)u

rn)

17

155

1.0

06

22

46

51

.02

50

-0

.01

91

1.9

4

20

46

31

.01

22

15

760

.98

71

50

.02

51

1.4

1

23

99

00

.97

61

30

570

.94

225

0.0

34

9.9

0

22

78

00

.98

81

38

60

0.9

45

30

0.0

43

9.7

4

13

34

70

.98

91

84

910

.91

34

00

.07

68

.50

15

34

91

.00

42

45

13

30

.89

14

50

.11

37

.75

14

25

00

.98

72

02

12

10

.86

450

0.1

23

7.5

2

*Y

ield

fig

ure

sap

pear

ex

ag

gera

ted

becau

sey

ield

calc

ula

tio

ns

fro

msm

all

sam

pli

ng

un

its

are

rep

ort

ed

on

hecta

reb

asi

s.