indiffrence curves

42
Chapter 3 1 ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Indifference Curves: An Example (pp. 65 - 79) 40 10 H 20 10 G 40 30 E 20 40 D 50 10 B 30 20 A Units of Clothing Units of Food Market Basket

Upload: muhammad-omer-mirza

Post on 20-Jun-2015

290 views

Category:

Business


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 1©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Indifference Curves:An Example (pp. 65 - 79)

4010H

2010G

4030E

2040D

5010B

3020A

Units of ClothingUnits of FoodMarket Basket

Page 2: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 2©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Indifference Curves:An Example (pp. 65 - 79)

�Graph the points with one good on the x-axis and one good on the y-axis

�Plotting the points, we can make someimmediate observations aboutpreferences�The more, the better

Page 3: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 3©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

The consumer prefersA to all combinations

in the yellow box, whileall those in the pink

box are preferred to A.

Indifference Curves:An Example (pp. 65 - 79)

Food

10

20

30

40

10 20 30 40

Clothing 50

G

A

EH

B

D

Page 4: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 4©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Indifference Curves:An Example (pp. 65 - 79)

�Points such as B & D have more of onegood but less of another compared to A�Need more information about consumer

ranking

�Consumer may decide they areindifferent between B, A and D�We can then connect those points with an

indifference curve

Page 5: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 5©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

•Indifferentbetween points B,A, & D•E is preferred toany points on theindifference curveU1•Points on U1 arepreferred to H & G

Indifference Curves:An Example (pp. 65 - 79)

Food

10

20

30

40

10 20 30 40

Clothing50

U1GD

A

EH

B

Page 6: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 6©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Indifference Curves (pp. 65 - 79)

�Any market basket lying northeast of anindifference curve is preferred to anymarket basket that lies on theindifference curve

�Points on the curve are preferred topoints southwest of the curve

Page 7: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 7©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Indifference Curves (pp. 65 - 79)

� Indifference curves slope downward tothe right�If they sloped upward, they would violate the

assumption that more is preferred to less

Page 8: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 8©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Indifference Curves (pp. 65 - 79)

� To describe preferences for allcombinations of goods/services, we havea set of indifference curves – anindifference map�Each indifference curve in the map shows

the market baskets among which the personis indifferent

Page 9: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 9©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

U2

U3

Indifference Map (pp. 65 - 79)

Food

Clothing

U1

ABD

Market basket Ais preferred to B.Market basket B ispreferred to D.

Page 10: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 10©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Indifference Maps (pp. 65 - 79)

� Indifference maps give more informationabout shapes of indifference curves�Indifference curves cannot cross

� Violates assumption that more is better

�Why? What if we assume they can cross?

Page 11: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 11©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Indifference Maps (pp. 65 - 79)

Food

Clothing

•B is preferred to D•A is indifferent to B & D•B must be indifferent toD but that can’t be if B ispreferred to D. Acontradiction•Other example: On a map, twocontours never crosseach other.

U1

U1

U2

U2

A

B

D

Page 12: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 12©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Indifference Curves (pp. 65 - 79)

� The shapes of indifference curvesdescribe how a consumer is willing tosubstitute one good for another�A to B, give up 6 clothing to get 1 food

�D to E, give up 2 clothing to get 1 food

� The more clothing and less food a personhas, the more clothing they will give up toget more food

Page 13: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 13©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

A

B

D

EG

-1

-6

1

1

-4

-21

1

Observation: The amountof clothing given up for 1 unit of food decreasesfrom 6 to 1

Indifference Curves (pp. 65 - 79)

Food

Clothing

2 3 4 51

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Page 14: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 14©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Indifference Curves (pp. 65 - 79)

�We measure how a person trades onegood for another using the marginal rateof substitution (MRS)�It quantifies the amount of one good a

consumer will give up to obtain more ofanother good, or the individual terms of trade

�From a geometric viewpoint, it is measuredby the slope of the indifference curve

Page 15: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 15©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Marginal Rate of Substitution (pp. 65

- 79)

Food2 3 4 51

Clothing

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16 A

B

D

EG

-6

1

1

11

-4

-2-1

MRS = 6

MRS = 2

FCMRS Δ

Δ−=

Page 16: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 16©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Marginal Rate of Substitution (pp. 65

- 79)

From A to B, give up 6 clothing to get 1 food.That is,

ΔF=2-1=1, ΔC=10-16 =-6; MRS=- ΔC / ΔF=6

From D to E, , give up 2 clothing to get 1 food;ΔF=4-3=1, ΔC=4-6 =-2; MRS =- ΔC / ΔF= 2

Page 17: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 17©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Marginal Rate of Substitution (pp. 65

- 79)

� Indifference curves are convex�As more of one good is consumed, a consumer would

prefer to give up fewer units of a second good to getadditional units of the first one. As food becomes lessscarce, he/she would give up less of clothing for anadditional food.

� Consumers generally prefer a balanced marketbasket (preference for varieties; the Doctrine ofthe Mean in a Chinese classic)

Page 18: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 18©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Marginal Rate of Substitution (pp. 65

- 79)

� The MRS decreases as we move downthe indifference curve�Along an indifference curve there is a

diminishing marginal rate of substitution.

�The MRS went from 6 to 4 to 1

Page 19: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 19©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Marginal Rate of Substitution (pp. 65

- 79)

� Indifference curves with different shapesimply a different willingness to substitute

[That is, an indifference map is a conceptto represent one’s preference for marketbaskets.]

� Two polar cases are of interest�Perfect substitutes

�Perfect complements

Page 20: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 20©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Marginal Rate of Substitution (pp. 65

- 79)

�Perfect Substitutes�Two goods are perfect substitutes when the

marginal rate of substitution of one good forthe other is constant

�Example: a person might consider applejuice and orange juice perfect substitutes� They would always trade 1 glass of OJ for 1

glass of Apple Juice

� Find your own examples.

Page 21: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 21©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Consumer Preferences (pp. 65 - 79)

Orange Juice(glasses)

Apple Juice

(glasses)

2 3 41

1

2

3

4

0

PerfectSubstitutes

Page 22: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 22©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Consumer Preferences (pp. 65 - 79)

�Perfect Complements�Two goods are perfect complements when

the indifference curves for the goods areshaped as right angles

�Example: If you have 1 left shoe and 1 rightshoe, you are indifferent between havingmore left shoes only� Must have one right for one left. That’s why we

always get a pair of shoes, not one by one.

� Find your own examples.

Page 23: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 23©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Consumer Preferences (pp. 65 - 79)

Right Shoes

LeftShoes

2 3 41

1

2

3

4

0

PerfectComplements

Page 24: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 24©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Consumer Preferences:An Application (pp. 65 - 79)

� In designing new cars, automobileexecutives must determine how muchtime and money to invest in restylingversus increased performance�Higher demand for car with better styling and

performance

�Both cost more to improve

Page 25: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 25©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Consumer Preferences:An Application (pp. 65 - 79)

�An analysis of consumer preferenceswould help to determine where to spendmore on change: performance or styling

�Some consumers will prefer better stylingand some will prefer better performance

� In recent years we have seen more andmore SUVs on our roads. Certainly moreowners/drivers prefer SUVs to otherstyles.

Page 26: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 26©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Consumer Preferences (pp. 65 - 79)

� The theory of consumer behavior doesnot required assigning a numerical valueto the level of satisfaction. Can you tellthe level of satisfaction from your monthlybasket?

�Although ranking of market baskets isgood, sometimes numerical value isuseful

Page 27: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 27©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Consumer Preferences (pp. 65 - 79)

�Utility�A numerical score (concept) representing the

satisfaction that a consumer gets from agiven market basket. The concept of utility wasborn before that of consumer preference.

�If buying 3 copies of Microeconomics makesyou happier than buying one shirt, then wesay that the books give you more utility thanthe shirt

Page 28: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 28©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Utility (pp. 65 - 79)

�Utility function�Formula that assigns a level of utility to

individual market baskets

�If the utility function is

U(F,C) = F + 2CA market basket with 8 units of food and 3 units of

clothing gives a utility of

14 = 8 + 2(3)

Page 29: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 29©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Utility - Example (pp. 65 - 79)

4 + 2(4) = 1244C

6 + 2(4) = 1446B

8 + 2(3) = 1438A

UtilityClothingFoodMarketBasket

Consumer is indifferent between A & B andprefers both to C.

Page 30: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 30©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Utility - Example (pp. 65 - 79)

�Baskets for each level of utility can beplotted to get an indifference curve�To find the indifference curve for a utility of

14, we can change the combinations of foodand clothing that give us a utility of 14

Page 31: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 31©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Utility - Another Example (pp. 65 - 79)

Food10 155

5

10

15

0

Clothing

U1 = 25

U2 = 50

U3 = 100A

B

C

Basket U = FC C 25 = 2.5(10) A 25 = 5(5) B 25 = 10(2.5)

Page 32: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 32©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Utility (pp. 65 - 79)

� Although we numerically rank baskets andindifference curves, numbers are ONLY forranking

� A utility of 4 is not necessarily twice as good asa utility of 2. A umber assigned to a utility levelDOES NOT have any meaning.

� There are two types of rankings�Ordinal ranking; Ordinal Utility Function Think of a number on your ticket when you are in a

waiting line.�Cardinal ranking; Cardinal Utility Function Think of the total number of students in this class.

Page 33: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 33©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Budget Constraints (pp. 79 - 83)

�Preferences do not explain all ofconsumer behavior

�Budget constraints limit an individual’sability to consume in light of the pricesthey must pay for various goods andservices

Page 34: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 34©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Budget Constraints (pp. 79 - 83)

� The Budget Line (Constraint)�Indicates all combinations of two

commodities for which total money spentequals total income

�We assume only 2 goods are consumed, sowe do not consider savings

Page 35: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 35©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

The Budget Line (pp. 79 - 83)

� Let F equal the amount of foodpurchased, and C is the amount ofclothing

�Price of food = PF and price ofclothing = PC

� Then PFF is the amount of money spenton food, and PCC is the amount of moneyspent on clothing

Page 36: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 36©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

ICPFPCF =+

The Budget Line (pp. 79 - 83)

� The budget line then can be written:

All income is allocated to food (F) and/or clothing(C)

Page 37: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 37©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

The Budget Line (pp. 79 - 83)

�Different choices of food and clothing canbe calculated that use all income�These choices can be graphed as the budget

line

�Example:�Assume income of $80/week, PF = $1 and PC

= $2

Page 38: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 38©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Budget Constraints (pp. 79 - 83)

$80080G

$801060E

$802040D

$803020B

$80400A

IncomeI = PFF + PCC

Clothing

PC = $2

Food

PF = $1

MarketBasket

Page 39: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 39©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

C

F

P

P

F

C Slope -

2

1- ==

Δ

Δ=

The Budget Line (pp. 79 - 83)

10

20

A

B

D

E

G

(I/PC) = 40

Food40 60 80 = (I/PF)20

10

20

30

0

Clothing

Page 40: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 40©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

The Budget Line (pp. 79 - 83)

�As consumption moves along a budgetline from the intercept, the consumerspends less on one item and more on theother

� The slope of the line measures therelative cost of food and clothing

� The slope is the negative of the ratio ofthe prices of the two goods

Page 41: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 41©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

The Budget Line (pp. 79 - 83)

� The slope indicates the rate at which thetwo goods can be substituted withoutchanging the amount of money spent

It represents exchange ratio or terms oftrade in market places.

�We can rearrange the budget lineequation to make this more clear

Page 42: Indiffrence curves

Chapter 3 42©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

The Budget Line (pp. 79 - 83)

YXP

P

P

I

YPXPI

YPXPI

Y

X

Y

YX

YX

=−

=−

+=