Indiana’sMajor Moves Projects

Asphalt Pavement Associationof Indiana

Michael B. Cline, P.E., PTOECommissioner

INDOTDecember 13, 2012

Six district offices 3,630 employees

1,600 Highway Technicians 800 Managers/Supervisors 300 Engineers

$389 million/annual operating budget

$1 billion/annual capital expenditures

28,400 total roadway lane miles 5,300 INDOT-owned bridges

INDOT Profile785

2,845

CO

Districts

Customer Satisfaction Survey

Building new highways

Adding lanes to existing highways

Minimizing congestion on highways

Removing debris from highways

Ensuring roadway striping on highways is visible

Keeping highway shoulders in good condition

Water drains quickly from highway surfaces

Repairing and maintaining bridges

Removing snow and ice from highways

Repairing and maintaining existing highways

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

8%

13%

21%

25%

27%

28%

29%

67%

69%

74%

Rated by percentage of respondents who rated the items as one of their top five choices.

Items that residents thought were critical for INDOT.

Contractor Satisfaction Survey

31%

38%

18%

13%

Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied

Rating of IN-DOT districts & CO

Satisfaction Levels with INDOT’s Performance Regarding Communication & Cooperation.

Contractor Satisfaction Survey

INDOT is willing to consider your input on decisions

Your awareness of the status of imminent and current INDOT projects that affect you

Your awareness of future INDOT plans

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

44%

70%

71%

Percentage of respondents Very Satisfied/Satisfied

Satisfaction levels with INDOT’s performance regarding communication & cooperation.

2012 INDOT Awards

Month Organization / Award Project/ProgramFebruary AASHTO / Project of the Week Sherman Minton Bridge

August ITE / Public Agency Achievement AwardNew Management Philosophy & Strategy

SeptemberCouncil of State Community Development Agencies (COSCDA) / Presidential Award for Innovation Stellar Communities

October AASHTO / Performance Excellence Award DamageWise

OctoberAASHTO / Performance Excellence Award – Gold Award Propane Vehicle Program

OctoberPopular Science Magazine / 25th Annual Best of What’s New Milton-Madison Bridge Project

OctoberConstruction Management Association of America (CMAA) / CMAA Award Sherman Minton Bridge

October CG/LA / Strategic Project of the YearOhio River Bridges - East End Crossing

November ACEC / Engineering Excellence Award Honor Award I-69 Sections 2-3

INDOT Investment FY 2006-15

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013* FY 2014* FY 2015*$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

Construction InvestmentsM

illio

ns

Includes construction, utility relocations and railroad expenditures.* FY13, FY14 and FY15 include P3 Financing that have yet to reach financial closure

Interstate Truck Trends

Pavement & Bridge Preservation

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Pavement & Bridge Preservation SpendingFY 2005-15

Mill

ions

Based on award amounts at time of letting. FY 2008-2009 include ARRA projects.2013 thru 2015 are estimated as of Nov 2012

Major Moves Projects

Project Miles % Miles Let

Est. $ CN Cost (m)

Final Letting

Open to Traffic

I-80/94 Interchange - 100 $197 2009 Aug. 2011Accelerate 465 11 100 $423 2010 Dec. 2012US 24 Fort to Port 11 100 $93 2010 Nov. 2012I-69 Evansville to Crane 67 100 $620 2011 Nov. 2012

Milton-Madison Bridge 1 100 $104 2010 April 2013US 31 Kokomo 13 100 $155 May 2012 Dec. 2013SR 25 Hoosier Heartland 36 100 $327 July 2012 Dec. 2013US 31 Plymouth to South Bend 20 92 $223 April 2013 Dec. 2014I-69 Crane to Bloomington 27 79 $400 March 2013 Dec. 2014US 31 Hamilton County 13 16 $320 Spring 2013 Dec. 2015

Total 199 $2.9B

Hoosier Heartland (SR 25) 36 miles Ribbon cuttings:

Oct. 24, 2012: 12 miles – I-65 to US 421

December 2013: 24 miles – US 421 to US 24

Open to traffic: Dec. 2013 CN Cost: $327 million

Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting

Hoosier Heartland at Clymers, Cass County.

Fort to Port (US 24) 11 miles Open to traffic: Nov. 14,

2012 CN Cost: $93 million

Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting

US 24/Fort to Port at Webster Road, Allen County.

Interstate 69 Sections 1-3: 67

miles Evansville to Crane

Open to traffic:Nov. 19, 2012

CN Cost: $620 million

Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting

I-69, Daviess County.

US 31 Hamilton County

13 miles 16% let

Final letting: Spring 2013 Open to traffic: Dec. 2015 CN Cost: $320 million

US 31 at SR 38, Hamilton County.

Major Moves

Interstate 69 Section 4: 27 miles

Crane to Bloomington 79% let

Bid openings: Segment 3: Dec. 12, 2012 Segment 2: March 2013

Open to traffic: Dec. 2014

Est. CN Cost: $400 million

Major Moves

Interstate 69 Section 5: 21 miles

Bloomington to Martinsville DEIS published: Oct. 26,

2012 RFI issued: Dec. 4, 2012 Public hearing: Dec. 6,

2012 ROD anticipated: Spring

2013 Construction to start: FY

2014 Est. CN Cost: $350 million

Major Moves

Total Cost: $2.6 billion Federal ROD approval:

June 20, 2012 Kentucky: Downtown

Crossing Indiana: East End Crossing East End Groundbreaking:

Aug. 30, 2012 Public Hearing: Dec. 1,

2012 IFA Determination: Dec. 3,

2012 Open to Traffic: October

2016

P3 Projects - Ohio River Bridges

P3 Projects - East End Crossing

Indiana Sections

48 miles from I-55 to I-65 Tolled expressway Environmental Impact Study

Preferred Route B3 announced Oct. 18, 2012 Tier One ROD anticipated in January 2013 Tier Two ROD anticipated in July 2014

P3 Projects - Illiana Corridor

Pavement Conditions

Pavement Condition Ratings are measured by Road Roughness, using the International Roughness Index (IRI).

In 2011, 3,060 of INDOT’s Lane Miles were in Fair or Poor Condition. If Preservation Spending Levels Remain Constant, it is Estimated that 4,445 Lane Miles will be Rated Fair or Poor by 2022, an Increase of 1,385 Miles (45%).

16

2006 2011 2017 20220%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

17%11% 13% 16%

13%11% 12%

14%

70%78% 75% 70%

Excellent/GoodSatisfactoryFair/Poor

Projec

ted

Federal Highway Bill (MAP-21) Indiana Impact:

FY 2013: $923M FY 2014: $931M Effective Date: October 1, 2012 Increased TIFIA program Increased tolling ability for new & added

capacity projects New performance measures & asset

management requirements

Pavement Selection Process Based on appropriate pavement

treatment design Existing pavement type, thickness &

distress level Ability of possible solutions to address the

problem, situation or pavement distresses present

Near-term and long-term cost effectiveness Construction costs Least cost of ownership

Right treatment, right time, right cost Engineering feasibility

1&1/2” resurface vs. 8” resurface vs. reconstruct, etc. Business case suitability

Interstate vs. minor state highway Budgetary impacts acceptability

Pavement Selection Process Considers not just HMA or PCCP, but also

possible & feasible treatment levels of intensity

Basic levels of intensity are: Routine or preventive maintenance Surface treatment

Chip-seal, PPI, mill-&-fill, etc. Minor structural treatment

2-lift overlay Major structural treatment

Rubberize, thick HMA or PCCP overlay Pavement construction or replacement

Pavement Peer Group Pavement Steering Committee Successor District pavement engineers & pavement

area engineers are pavement owners Everyone else works to support them

Forum for broad discussion of pavement issues so pavement owners can make decisions

To include agency, engineering consultants, construction industry, etc.

Chapter 304 Revisions Incorporate new agency pavement

organization, i.e., district pavement engineers, pavement area engineers, etc.

Incorporate new Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) philosophy & methodology (Darwin M-E software)

More clearly delineate pavement treatment, selection expectations for internal & external designers

Reflect increase reliance on pavement design engineers’ professional judgment

Alternate Bidding HMA & PCCP options considered Best results when alternate pavement

type considerations determined early in project development

9% (+/-) construction savings typically No longer FHWA experiment, Pavement

Selection Process Continued discussion on lower limit Future looking into alternate treatments

at PPI level?

Thank You