inclined burner firing eliminates flame impingment short

11
Confidentia l 06/16/22 Furnace 1 Study Objectives Identify ways to eliminate flame impingement on the tubes and reduce tube metal temperature in radiant section FIS has recommended the following modifications: – Bring Burners Closer to the Center by about 1-2 ft.. – Incline burners by 5 towards the center Carry out CFD Modeling of the Burners and Combustion Chamber to demonstrate the benefits of the proposed modifications

Upload: yogitadoda

Post on 25-Jun-2015

194 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation on Inclined Burner Firing Eliminates Flame Impingment Short

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Inclined Burner Firing Eliminates Flame Impingment  Short

Co

nfid

en

tia

l

04/13/23 Furnace 1

Study Objectives

• Identify ways to eliminate flame impingement on the tubes and reduce tube metal temperature in radiant section

• FIS has recommended the following modifications:– Bring Burners Closer to the Center by about 1-2 ft..– Incline burners by 5 towards the center

• Carry out CFD Modeling of the Burners and Combustion Chamber to demonstrate the benefits of the proposed modifications

Page 2: Inclined Burner Firing Eliminates Flame Impingment  Short

Co

nfid

en

tia

l

Existing Burner Arrangement Elevation

04/13/23EXISTING FLOOR & PLENUM ARRANGEMENT

Furnace Improvements

Page 3: Inclined Burner Firing Eliminates Flame Impingment  Short

Co

nfid

en

tia

l

Velocity Vectors at 45 degBase Case vs. Proposed Case

Page 4: Inclined Burner Firing Eliminates Flame Impingment  Short

Co

nfid

en

tia

l

Temperature Contours at 45 degBase Case vs. Proposed Case

Base Case Proposed Case

Page 5: Inclined Burner Firing Eliminates Flame Impingment  Short

Co

nfid

en

tia

l

Temperature Contours at 5ft Base Case vs. Proposed Case

Base Case Proposed Case

At 5 ft.At 5 ft.

Page 6: Inclined Burner Firing Eliminates Flame Impingment  Short

Co

nfid

en

tia

l

Temperature Contours at 10ft Base Case vs. Proposed Case

Base Case Proposed Case

At 10 ft.At 10 ft.

Page 7: Inclined Burner Firing Eliminates Flame Impingment  Short

Co

nfid

en

tia

l

CO mass fraction contours (PPM) at 10ft Base Case vs. Proposed Case

At 10 ft.At 10 ft.

Page 8: Inclined Burner Firing Eliminates Flame Impingment  Short

Co

nfid

en

tia

l

CO mass fraction contours (PPM) at 15ft Base Case vs. Proposed Case

At 15 ft.At 15 ft.

Page 9: Inclined Burner Firing Eliminates Flame Impingment  Short

Co

nfid

en

tia

l

Path lines colored by temperature (o F)- Base Case vs. Proposed Case

Base Case Proposed Case

Page 10: Inclined Burner Firing Eliminates Flame Impingment  Short

Co

nfid

en

tia

l

Iso surface of CO mass fraction 2000 PPM coloredby flame height (ft.)- Base Case vs. Proposed Case

Base Case Proposed Case

Page 11: Inclined Burner Firing Eliminates Flame Impingment  Short

Co

nfid

en

tia

l

Summary

• Base case has the recirculation region at center of heater, there by diverting the flow towards the radiant tubes.

• Proposed Case has no recirculation zone between opposite burners there by no bending of flame is observed

• Due to above reason flame length is increased for 20 ft(for base case) to 24 ft. for Proposed Case

• High temperatures are confined to center of heater • Flame impingement is eliminated