improving fertilizer use efficiency for horticultural crops

58
Improving Fertilizer Use Efficiency for Horticultural Crops University of Florida

Upload: pailang88

Post on 10-Nov-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Klcp Codec Log

TRANSCRIPT

  • Improving Fertilizer Use Efficiency for Horticultural Crops

    University of Florida

  • ! "

    #$#$ ! %&%

    #$#$ ! %'

  • ()%&%$

    (%)%&%

  • Increase fertilizer use efficiency: Low P fertilizer formula Soluble vs. Controlled-release fertilizers Fertigation Foliar fertilization Snake oils Other practices

  • Low P fertilizer formula

  • %$

  • %$

  • P fertilizer rate (% of grower rate)0 50 100

    Y

    i

    e

    l

    d

    (

    b

    a

    g

    s

    /

    a

    c

    )

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    a aa

    *++,-*++

    *++-*+++

    *+++-

  • So

    i

    l

    P

    (

    p

    p

    m

    )

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    2000

    2200

    0.13%3.47%

    AB-DTPAextractable

    non-extractable

    96.4%

  • 4 5 6 7 8

    p

    H

    2

    P

    O

    4

    -

    +

    1

    /

    p

    C

    a

    2

    +

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    Rockdale1--PinelandRockdale2Rockdale3

    Biscayne--WetlandBiscayne2Biscayne3

    Krome1Vegetable fieldKrome2Krome3Chekika1Chekika2

    Krome4--Fruit groveKrome5Krome6

    Pozo Blanco--Puerto RicoFraternidad

    Guam1Guam2

    pH - 1/2pCa2+4 5 6 7 8

    p

    H

    2

    P

    O

    4

    -

    +

    1

    /

    p

    C

    a

    2

    +

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    B

    A

    DCPD

    CaHPO4 2H

    2 OOCP

    Ca8 H

    2 (PO4 )6

    5H2 O

    TCP

    -Ca3 (PO

    4 )2

    HA

    Ca

    10 (PO4 )6 (OH)2

    DCPD

    CaHPO4 2H

    2 O

    OCP Ca

    8 H2 (PO

    4 )6 5H

    2 OTCP

    -Ca

    3 (PO4 )2

    HA

    Ca10 (PO

    4 )6 (OH)2CRD

    CaAl3 (PO

    4 )2 (OH)

    5H2 O

    CRD

    CaAl3 (PO

    4 )2 (OH)

    5H2 O

    FA

    Ca5 F(PO

    4 )3

    FA

    Ca5 F(PO4)3

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    Soluble P ExchangeableP

    Al-Fe P O rganic P Ca-Mg P Residual P

    P

    e

    r

    c

    e

    n

    t

    a

    g

    e

    o

    f

    T

    o

    t

    a

    l

    P

    Soil 7 TomatoSoil 11 AvocadoSoil 12 LimeSoil 16 ENP

  • PK

  • Soil and Air Temperatures:24 hr. Jan. 26 to 27.(6 pm -5 pm)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

    Hours

    D

    e

    g

    r

    e

    e

    s

    C

    e

    n

    t

    i

    g

    r

    a

    d

    e

    G AIR

  • 0102030405060708090

    Mar-97 Jul-98 Dec-99 Apr-01 Sep-02 Jan-04 May-05 Oct-06 Feb-08 Jul-09

    2m T min (F)Tsoil min(avg) -10cm (F)

    Year

  • 0102030405060708090

    Mar-97 Jul-98 Dec-99 Apr-01 Sep-02 Jan-04 May-05 Oct-06 Feb-08 Jul-09

    2m T min (F)Tsoil min(avg) -10cm (F)

    Year

    ! "

    #$% &' (' )*

    #+,% &- -( )&

  • PK

  • .

  • '- -.

    u /%& 0$&1

    *-*-**-*---+2-*3-

    3-3-3-3-+

    u 4

    %%1)/0/*56,-*-7

  • '- -.

    u /%& 0$&1

    *-3-*-2-*-2-*-2-*

    u 4

    %%1 )/$/+$52-*-37

  • '- -.)&0

    u /%& 0$&1

    3-*-*,-**-*2--*3-363-363

    u 4

    %%1 )/0/+$56,-*-27

  • 1!

    %)0 58-9: 871

    ' ;,

  • 23

    /

  • Water-soluble fertilizer

  • >water-soluble. >plentiful. >lowest cost

    materials. >leachable.

  • Typical water-soluble N and P fertilizers used in horticultural productionNitrogen Ammonium sulfate Ammonium nitrate Urea Potassium nitrate Calcium nitrate

    Phosphorus Concentrated

    superphosphate Mono-ammonium

    phosphate Di-ammonium

    phosphate Ammonium

    polyphosphate

  • Nutrient release from CRF depends on temperature and moisture

    Water-soluble Slow/controlled-Release

    Ammonium nitrate

    Non-coated

    Urea formaldehyde

    Coated

    Osmocote

    Dissolves allat once

    Slowly decomposes to soluble N

    Nutrients leakthrough coating

  • Examples of slow and controlled-release fertilizersNon-coated Nitroform Nutralene Nitamin IBDU(N sources only)

    Coated Osmocote Polyon Nutricote Syncote Polymer/Sulfur-coated

    fertilizers(N, P, K + others)

  • 45

    #46%

  • Polymer coating layer

  • PLANT RESPONSE to CRF depends on how well the release curve matches plant need.

  • 8)%&/4!4!

    Improved nitrogen use efficiency by10 50%

    ?*

  • 12.33

    8.126.9

    4.92 4.343.35

    IBDUSCU

    POLYONNITROFORM

    ASUAN

    NITROGEN SOURCE

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    G

    R

    O

    W

    T

    H

    R

    A

    T

    E

    (

    k

    g

    /

    h

    a

    /

    d

    )

    A B BC CD CD D

    ") $&0$'5*$%0'*@6+$7

  • ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ????????????

    ??????

    ?????

    ??????

    ?????

    ??????

    ?????

    ??????

    ?????

    ??????

    ?????

    ??????

    ?????

    ??????

    ?????

    ??????

    ?????

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ?

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ?

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ?

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ?

    ??????

    ????

    ??????

    ????

    ??????

    ????

    ??????

    ????

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ??????

    ?????

    ??????

    ??????

    ?????

    ??????

    ??????

    ?????

    ??????

    ??????

    ?????

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

  • 8)%&/4!4!

    Fewer applications needed.(Decreased application cost.)

    ?

  • 25 50 75 100 25 50 75 100 25 50 75 100 25 50 75 100

    Percentage of full N rate25 50 75 1000 25 50 75 1004

    -

    y

    r

    l

    b

    s

    -

    s

    o

    l

    i

    d

    s

    y

    i

    e

    l

    d

    /

    t

    r

    e

    e

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35Escote Meister Nutricote ProkoteSierraConventional

    CR = 94% CR = 100%

    CR = 100% CR = 100%CR = 84%

    CR = 76%

    :%6%%3-$-&)

    24 6 6 6 6 6

  • 8)%&/4!

    Environmentally advantageous;less fertilizer loss.(Decreased nitrate leachingbelow root zone.)

    ?

  • %&'$&50'*@66*A$7

    12.8

    8.17.2

    2.9 2.8 2.81.1 0.4

    ASUAN

    CORONNUTRALENE

    POLYONSCU

    IBDUNITROFORM

    NITROGEN SOURCE

    02468

    101214

    P

    E

    R

    C

    E

    N

    T

    A

    G

    E

    O

    F

    A

    P

    P

    L

    I

    E

    D

    N

    L

    E

    A

    C

    H

    E

    D

    (

    %

    )

    A B B C C C D E

  • 8)%&/4!

    Decrease salt damage?2

  • High-volume use of controlled-release fertilizer is limited to> >turfgrass >greenhouse >nursery >landscape

  • Cost of materials for citrus (3 yrs ago)!

    3-$ 5B7

    /)0

    "%5B7

    ' *+6A 36A ,62,

    *A6* A6 362*

    C *26+ 26+ A6+

    -0 A63 26 A62

    '% 6 *6 **6

  • How does the relative COST OF FERTILIZER MATERIALS AND APPLICATION METHODSaffect fertilizer selection by producers?

    Vegetables (3 yrs ago) Potato study: Cost of a water-soluble N fertilization

    program D $38 to $63 per acre. Extra cost to use a CRF program cost D $8 to $79

    more than the most expensive soluble N cost. Extra cost could be offset by reduced application rate

    and/or providing cost-share to use CRF.

  • What do we know about CRF>>rates?>timing?>placement?>plant response?>leaching?>release rates as affected by

    temperature and moisture?

  • Fertigation

  • Fertigation:What do we know about>

    >nutrient use-efficiency?>application frequency?>plant response?>leaching potential?

  • Yield at four pre-plant/fertigation N fertilizer combinations.Fert. application method

    Percent N applied

    pre-plant

    Percent N applied by fertigation

    Total fancy pepper yield

    Total marketable pepper yield

    ---------------- tons/acre ----------------0 100 4.2 9.1

    30 70 4.4 9.570 30 3.8 8.3100 0 2.9 6.6

    P-value 0.0531 0.0006

    Fertigation improved N USE EFFICIENCY inbell pepper production.

  • 355314Monthly286238Weekly424681Every irrigation2000

    245611Monthly275836Weekly305176Every irrigation1999%%

    N uptake efficiencyz

    Relative amount of applied N that

    leachedFertigations

    per yearFertigation treatmentYear

    6-year-old orange trees growing in lysimeters.

    8%'%0$)0$

    %'6

    With good water management, fertigationAPPLICATION FREQUENCY doesnt matter much.

  • Horticultural PLANT RESPONSE to fertigationis as good or better than the response observedwith well-managed dry soluble fertilization.In both cases, irrigation (and sometimesdrainage) water management is criticalfor success.

  • ---31.319.0250---27.112.22007.121.511.81502.916.311.11000.8------50

    ---------------- lbs N/acre/year ----------------lbs/acre

    CRFFertigationDry soluble fertilizerN rate

    Estimated N leached below a ridge citrus grove root zone.

    Why was there more leaching with fertigation comparedwith dry soluble fertilizer application?

    Study authors: This occurred purely because ofunexpected prolonged irrigation or unexpected highrainfall following certain fertigation events in both years.

  • Foliar fertilization

  • Can FOLIAR FERTILIZER APPLICATIONimprove nutrient use efficiency?

    Tree crops: Possibly Foliar uptake of urea can be 50% efficient; it

    has enhanced flowering and yield. Phosphite is recognized as a P source; it has

    increased flowering, fruiting, and lbs solids. Vegetables: No?

    Leaves cannot absorb enough N/P to correct a deficiency.

    Leaf burn is likely.

  • 7

    8.4

  • !

    )%&%%%%6)%%&)%&6E)0%%$%%%%%6

    )F$&

    &%%%0%%%

    %&%6

  • Improve fertilizer use efficiency by: Develop a nutrient management plan Do a fertilizer trial by yourself Use appropriate application equipment. Use appropriate fertilizer sources and

    formulations Add organic matter to the soil whenever

    possible. Split fertilizer applications. Try to wet only the root zone when irrigating.

  • THANK YOU!

    Questions?