implementing a provincial case mix adjusted funding model for inpatient rehabilitation activity: the...

1
BioMed Central Page 1 of 1 (page number not for citation purposes) BMC Health Services Research Open Access Meeting abstract Implementing a provincial case mix adjusted funding model for inpatient rehabilitation activity: the impact on bed designations Jan Walker* 1 and Jason Sutherland 2 Address: 1 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Canada and 2 The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA Email: Jan Walker* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Background This paper will describe the implementation of a case mix system for inpatient rehabilitation activity in Ontario and review the impact of the implementation on hospital bed designation in the province. Data In the fall of 2002, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (MOHLTC) mandated the collection of National Rehabilitation Reporting System (NRS) data in all designated adult inpatient rehabilitation beds. From these data we developed a case mix grouping methodol- ogy with associated weights. Together these are being used to incorporate adult inpatient rehabilitation activity into the Integrated Population Based Allocation (IPBA) hospi- tal funding formula. In Ontario, designated inpatient rehabilitation is typically provided in two sectors. Within the acute care sector, hospitals may or may not have des- ignated rehabilitation beds. Even in hospitals that do not have designated rehabilitation beds, a patient may receive some rehabilitation while an inpatient, or on an outpa- tient basis. For example, a patient who has just had sur- gery may be visited by a physiotherapist to increase range- of-motion and strength while recovering from surgery. Within the rehabilitation hospital sector, facilities typi- cally have designated rehabilitation beds and are usually referred to as rehabilitation hospitals. The care in these facilities is often organized on a programmatic basis, time limited and goal oriented. For example, a facility may have a stroke rehabilitation program that is 6 to 8 weeks long for individuals following stroke. These programs are provided on an inpatient basis and may or may not have an outpatient component at the end. Rehabilitation is also provided in other sectors of the health care system, but not on a designated inpatient basis. Provincial Imple- mentation: Results and discussion The province followed a three year implementation plan. During the first year data quality and completeness issued were identified. During the second year these issues were addressed, and regional education sessions were held to educate providers on the new case mix system. In response to the provincial implementation, certain facilities embarked on case mix reviews. These reviews included grouping their inpatient rehabilitation data for the first time in order to understand their case mix distribution and to investigate the issue of 'specialty populations'. One specific issue uncovered was the appropriateness of care being provided in designated rehabilitation beds. For example, Tuberculosis care was being provided in desig- nated rehabilitation beds, however, the care was not typi- cal rehabilitative care. We will discuss the implications of issues such as this and the potential for re-organization of bed designations in this sector. from 23rd Patient Classifications Systems International (PCSI) Working Conference Venice, Italy. 7–10 November 2007 Published: 26 November 2007 BMC Health Services Research 2007, 7(Suppl 1):A2 doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-S1-A2 <supplement> <title> <p>Patient Classification Systems International: 2007 Case Mix Conference</p> </title> <editor>Jason Sutherland</editor> <sponsor> <note>Publication of these abstracts has been funded by Patient Classification Systems International (PCSI) (<url>http://www.pcsinternational.org</url>)</note> </sponsor> <note>Meeting abstracts – A single PDF containing all abstracts in this Supplement is available <a href="[http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/files/pdf/1472-6963-7-S1-full.pdf]">here</a>.</note> <url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6963-7-S1-info.pdf</url> </ supplement> This abstract is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/S1/A2 © 2007 Walker and Sutherland; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Upload: jan-walker

Post on 30-Sep-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Implementing a provincial case mix adjusted funding model for inpatient rehabilitation activity: the impact on bed designations

BioMed Central

Page 1 of 1(page number not for citation purposes)

BMC Health Services Research

Open AccessMeeting abstractImplementing a provincial case mix adjusted funding model for inpatient rehabilitation activity: the impact on bed designationsJan Walker*1 and Jason Sutherland2

Address: 1Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Canada and 2The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA

Email: Jan Walker* - [email protected]

* Corresponding author

BackgroundThis paper will describe the implementation of a case mixsystem for inpatient rehabilitation activity in Ontario andreview the impact of the implementation on hospital beddesignation in the province.

DataIn the fall of 2002, the Ontario Ministry of Health andLong Term Care (MOHLTC) mandated the collection ofNational Rehabilitation Reporting System (NRS) data inall designated adult inpatient rehabilitation beds. Fromthese data we developed a case mix grouping methodol-ogy with associated weights. Together these are being usedto incorporate adult inpatient rehabilitation activity intothe Integrated Population Based Allocation (IPBA) hospi-tal funding formula. In Ontario, designated inpatientrehabilitation is typically provided in two sectors. Withinthe acute care sector, hospitals may or may not have des-ignated rehabilitation beds. Even in hospitals that do nothave designated rehabilitation beds, a patient may receivesome rehabilitation while an inpatient, or on an outpa-tient basis. For example, a patient who has just had sur-gery may be visited by a physiotherapist to increase range-of-motion and strength while recovering from surgery.Within the rehabilitation hospital sector, facilities typi-cally have designated rehabilitation beds and are usuallyreferred to as rehabilitation hospitals. The care in thesefacilities is often organized on a programmatic basis, timelimited and goal oriented. For example, a facility mayhave a stroke rehabilitation program that is 6 to 8 weeks

long for individuals following stroke. These programs areprovided on an inpatient basis and may or may not havean outpatient component at the end. Rehabilitation isalso provided in other sectors of the health care system,but not on a designated inpatient basis. Provincial Imple-mentation:

Results and discussionThe province followed a three year implementation plan.During the first year data quality and completeness issuedwere identified. During the second year these issues wereaddressed, and regional education sessions were held toeducate providers on the new case mix system. In responseto the provincial implementation, certain facilitiesembarked on case mix reviews. These reviews includedgrouping their inpatient rehabilitation data for the firsttime in order to understand their case mix distributionand to investigate the issue of 'specialty populations'. Onespecific issue uncovered was the appropriateness of carebeing provided in designated rehabilitation beds. Forexample, Tuberculosis care was being provided in desig-nated rehabilitation beds, however, the care was not typi-cal rehabilitative care. We will discuss the implications ofissues such as this and the potential for re-organization ofbed designations in this sector.

from 23rd Patient Classifications Systems International (PCSI) Working ConferenceVenice, Italy. 7–10 November 2007

Published: 26 November 2007

BMC Health Services Research 2007, 7(Suppl 1):A2 doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-S1-A2

<supplement> <title> <p>Patient Classification Systems International: 2007 Case Mix Conference</p> </title> <editor>Jason Sutherland</editor> <sponsor> <note>Publication of these abstracts has been funded by Patient Classification Systems International (PCSI) (<url>http://www.pcsinternational.org</url>)</note> </sponsor> <note>Meeting abstracts – A single PDF containing all abstracts in this Supplement is available <a href="[http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/files/pdf/1472-6963-7-S1-full.pdf]">here</a>.</note> <url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6963-7-S1-info.pdf</url> </supplement>

This abstract is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/S1/A2

© 2007 Walker and Sutherland; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.